DOCSLIB.ORG

Create a Cover Sheet for a Fax

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Create a Cover Sheet for a Fax Agenda Item 8 Report PC 77/13 Appendix 2 SDNPA Landscape Architect response to Planning Consultation Application ref: 13/00844/FUL Description: Erection of 6 wind turbines with a maximum height of 130.5m and associated development for a period of 25 years, including meteorological mast, control building, electricity transformers, underground cabling, access tracks, crane hardstandings and vehicular access Address: Land At Woodmancott, Grid Ref: 457347 143175, Popham, Micheldever, Hampshire LPA Basingstoke and Deane District Council Summary response: Objection, The proposed development would have an adverse impact on the landscape, setting and special qualities of South Downs National Park, which the statutory National Park purposes, and other local, regional and national policies seek to protect. The proposal would affect views out of and into the National Park owing to the size, scale and extent of the proposed wind turbines in the landscape within the visual envelope of the National Park boundary. This would erode the quality of the breathtaking views which are noted as Special Qualities of the National Park. The likely cumulative impacts of a further potential windfarm at Bullington Cross, 7km to the west of the proposed site also forms part of the objection. Landscape Character Assessment The site is within the National Character Area (NCA) of the Hampshire Downs (JCA130). This character area extends from approximately Andover in the west to Alton in the east and includes a sizeable section of the National Park to the east of Winchester. The NCA describes one of the key characteristics of the Hampshire Downs as : ‘Strongly rolling downland with scarps, hilltops, and valleys which have an overall open and exposed character.’ Landscape character is considered to be continuous at the national scale between the proposed windfarm site and the National Park. There are extensive views over the Hampshire Downs NCA from elevated viewpoint locations within the National Park. The National Park boundary is not apparent to the viewer of the landscape. Views which include landscape beyond the National Park boundary (of which there are many) include this ‘borrowed’ landscape as a continuous feature and are likewise affected by changes to landscape character and quality. It is noted that the Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) prepared by the applicant does not refer to the South Downs Integrated Landscape Character Assessment (SDILCA) of the National Park. The following baseline information is however considered to be relevant to the consideration of the impacts of the proposed windfarm and is taken directly from the SDILCA’ The Hampshire Downs NCA is included within the landscape assessed as Landscape Type A: Open Downland within the SDILCA, it is described as follows: ‘The open downland landscape comprises a distinctive narrow spine of open chalk upland landscape on the south facing dipslope of the South Downs, mostly located to the east of the Arun Valley (with an outlier close to 35 W13/00800/FUL – Landscape Winchester), meeting the sea at the Seven Sisters. This is Kipling’s ‘Blunt, bow-headed, whale-backed Downs (Sussex 1902)’ The area to the east of Winchester which is closest to the proposed windfarm, and contains significant viewpoints is identified in the SDILCA as being within Landscape Area A5: East Winchester Open Downs. The Integrated key characteristics of area A5 are described as: ‘Open rolling upland chalk landscape rolling Downs reaching 176m at Cheesefoot Head.’ ‘Due to the open character of the East Winchester Open Downs there are expansive views over Winchester and the Itchen Valley’ ‘Large open skies ensure that weather conditions are a dominant influence creating a dynamic, moody landscape, particularly on higher ground – eg at Cheesefoot Head.’ ‘A strong sense of remoteness and tranquillity away from the major transport routes (M3, A31, A272) which cross the landscape.’ ‘Panoramic views from Cheesefoot Head and from St Catherine’s hill across the Itchen Valley’ The South Downs Integrated Character Assessment is considered to provide key information about the nature of the landscape character of the National Park. It should therefore be considered in the LVIA landscape baseline in order to inform the LVIA assessment of impacts process. The following Key Sensitivities of this landscape character area are considered relevant to this application: ’The elevated landform typical of this landscape type means there is little inter-visibilityof adjacent landscape types, except on it’s edges (although it should be noted that tall structures could be visible over long distances). For example, the downland that forms the crest of the escarpment permits long views to and from a wider area beyond the South Downs. The Landscape is also visually sensitive to changes beyond the South Downs boundary, for example within the adjacent urban areas.’ pg 67 Impact on views and Landscape Character The views to the north from the South Downs Way and the north-west facing slopes of the downs would be affected by the proposed windfarm turbines. The existing views are extensive and are unaffected by industrial infrastructure, being a well wooded undulating pastoral and agricultural landscape. There is minimal visible movement in the landscape despite the proximity of transport routes which are not broadly visible. The proposed windfarm would introduce a large scale industrial feature into the views which due to rotational movement would be likely to attract the eye and become a point of visual focus. Variable weather conditions and sun direction would have an impact on the degree to which the proposed turbines would impose on the views. Reflected sunlight will make them more visible when viewed from a southerly direction. The views of the proposed development from the South Downs Way are possible for some distance to the east and west of Cheesefoot Head. This is a well used public car park and view point in the National Park in close proximity to Winchester and it’s population. It also provides access to the South Downs Way. Views are intermittent as tree cover and topography allows. There would a cumulative impact from this proposal on these views from the further proposed windfarm at Bullington Cross. The two proposed windfarms are only 7km apart and would be viewed mostly in succession by users of the South Downs Way in the vicinity of Cheesefoot Head. Whilst cumulative impact is identified in the applicant’s Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, it does not appear to be 36 W13/00800/FUL – Landscape addressed in sufficient detail in the study in relation to the Special Qualities of the National Park or the South Downs Integrated Landscape Character Assessment. Identification of the ‘Special Qualities of the South Downs National Park’ is a requirement of the National Park Authority which is set out in the 1949 Act and DEFRA Circular 2010 English National Parks and the Broads Government Vision and Circular. The report identifies ‘Diverse, inspirational landscapes and breathtaking views’ as the first special quality of the SDNP. It is considered that the breathtaking views from Cheesefoot Head and various points along the South Downs Way in the vicinity would be detrimentally affected by the proposed windfarm for the reasons stated above. It is accepted that the proposed wind farm would be a distant influence within wide panoramic views. Variations in weather and sun direction would alter the degree of impact and intrusion by the proposed turbines into the otherwise rural distant view. However, breathtaking views are noted as a special quality of the National Park (Ref Government Circular & Vision for the English National Parks and the Broads 2010) for which the Authority is tasked with protecting. The wide panoramic views are noted as a landscape character feature in the South Downs Integrated Landscape Character Assessment. These views are also noted as a key sensitivity to change of this landscape character area which at a national level includes the proposed site and the noted viewpoints within the National park as noted above. Veronica Craddock Landscape Officer South Downs National Park Authority Rosemary's Parlour, North Street, Midhurst West Sussex, GU29 9SB Tel 01730 811759 x 271 email: [email protected] 37 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • North West Inshore and Offshore Marine Plan Areas
    Seascape Character Assessment for the North West Inshore and Offshore marine plan areas MMO 1134: Seascape Character Assessment for the North West Inshore and Offshore marine plan areas September 2018 Report prepared by: Land Use Consultants (LUC) Project funded by: European Maritime Fisheries Fund (ENG1595) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Version Author Note 0.1 Sally First draft desk-based report completed May 2015 Marshall Paul Macrae 1.0 Paul Macrae Updated draft final report following stakeholder consultation, August 2018 1.1 Chris MMO Comments Graham, David Hutchinson 2.0 Paul Macrae Final report, September 2018 2.1 Chris Independent QA Sweeting © Marine Management Organisation 2018 You may use and re-use the information featured on this website (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. Visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/ to view the licence or write to: Information Policy Team The National Archives Kew London TW9 4DU Email: [email protected] Information about this publication and further copies are available from: Marine Management Organisation Lancaster House Hampshire Court Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 7YH Tel: 0300 123 1032 Email: [email protected] Website: www.gov.uk/mmo Disclaimer This report contributes to the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) evidence base which is a resource developed through a large range of research activity and methods carried out by both MMO and external experts. The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of MMO nor are they intended to indicate how MMO will act on a given set of facts or signify any preference for one research activity or method over another.
    [Show full text]
  • Cholsey and Caversham: Impacts on Protected Landscapes
    Oxfordshire County Council Strategic Landscape Assessment of potential minerals working at Cholsey and Caversham: impacts on Protected Landscapes. February 2012 Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste LDF Landscape Study Contents 1 Aims and scope Background 1 Aims 1 Sites & scope 1 2 Methodology 2 Overview of Methodology 2 Assessment of landscape capacity 3 3 Policy Context 7 National Landscape Policy and Legislation 7 Regional policies 9 Oxfordshire policies 9 4 AONB plans and policies 11 Development affecting the setting of AONBs 11 Chilterns AONB policies and guidance 11 North Wessex Downs AONB policies and guidance 13 5 Cholsey 14 6 Caversham 24 7 Overall recommendations 33 Appendix 1: GIS datasets 34 Appendix 2:National Planning Policy Framework relating to 35 landscape and AONBs Appendix 2: Regional planning policies relating to landscape 37 Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste LDF Landscape Study Section 1. Aims and Scope Background 1.1 Oxfordshire’s draft Minerals and Waste Core Strategy was published for public consultation in September 2011. A concern was identified in the responses made by the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and North Wessex Downs AONB. This related to potential landscape impacts on the Protected Landscapes of minerals developments within two proposed broad areas for sand and gravel working at Cholsey and Caversham. This study identifies the nature of these impacts, and potential mitigation measures which could help reduce the impacts. 1.2 The impacts identified will refer both to the operational phase of any development, and restoration phases. Recommendations may help to identify potential restoration priorities, and mitigation measures. Aims 1.3 The aim of the study is to carry out an assessment of the potential landscape impacts of minerals development within two proposed areas for mineral working on the setting of Oxfordshire’s AONBs.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Environment Record Search
    Worcestershire Archive and Archaeology Service Providing Villagespecialist hall information and advice to the public, local authorities and developers Historic Environment Record Search Parish Search for Hallow 12/03/2019 Find out more online at www.worcestershire.gov.uk/archaeology 0 Historic Environment Record Search Author: Webley, A Version 2 Date of Issue: 12/06/2019 Contents: An Archaeological Summary for your search area Archaeological Summary, Statutory and other Designations Information about the data sent to you Introduction, Guidelines for Access, Copyright, Planning Policy, The HER Data Glossary and Terms Glossary of Commonly used terms, General periods in the HER Modern and Historic Mapping 1841 Tithe Map of the Parish of Hallow. Digitised Extract. 1841 Tithe Map of the Parish of Hallow over Modern OS. Ordnance Survey, © Crown Copyright. 1887 1st Edition OS Map 1:10560 (2 maps) over Modern OS Map. Ordnance Survey, © Crown Copyright. 1903-04 2nd Edition OS Map 1:2500 (2 maps) Ordnance Survey, © Crown Copyright. Modern OS map showing HER features: Prehistoric and Roman Period © Crown Copyright. Modern OS map showing HER features: Medieval Period © Crown Copyright. Modern OS map showing HER features: Post Medieval Period (2 Maps) © Crown Copyright. Modern OS map showing HER features: 20th Century© Crown Copyright. Modern OS map showing Historic Buildings of Worcestershire Project Points© Crown Copyright. Modern OS map showing HER features: Historic Landscape Character © Crown Copyright. The HER short report Monuments Lists sorted by period follow directly after each HER Features Map A Full Monument list sorted by monument type and Scheduled Ancient Monuments List (if present), follow after the map section.
    [Show full text]
  • 68. Needwood & South Derbyshire Claylands
    National Character 68. Needwood & South Derbyshire Claylands Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 68. Needwood & South Derbyshire Claylands Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Hampshire Downs
    Flora of the Hampshire Downs Naturetrek Tour Report 10 - 12 June 2011 Fly Orchid Narrow leaved Marsh Orchid White Fragrant Orchid Report and images compiled by Jon Stokes Naturetrek Cheriton Mill Cheriton Alresford Hampshire SO24 0NG England T: +44 (0)1962 733051 F: +44 (0)1962 736426 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Flora of the Hampshire Downs Tour Leader: Jon Stokes (Naturetrek Leader & Naturalist) Participants: Gill Wright Jane Hughes Maureen Reynolds Valerie Storey Alison Barclay Chris Piper Day 1 Friday 10th June The group arrived at the hotel for dinner, after which we set off on our first outing. As the evening drew in we headed east towards Petersfield seeing a Roe Deer bounding down the road in front of us, before arriving at Coulters Dean Bank. Here Greater Butterfly Orchids were flowering and their faint perfume could be smelt on the damp evening air. Common Spotted Orchids and Wild Columbine were also part of the downs riches. Overhead bats flew and a Robin sang from the bushes but all too soon darkness set in, so we headed back to the hotel and bed. Day 2 Saturday 11th June The morning dawned bright and clear and we set off for our first visit of the day. Arriving at a small wet meadow, the first plants to be seen were Southern Marsh and Narrow Leaved Marsh Orchids, but unfortunately the meadow had been cut, so many of the other flowers were not visible. We therefore set off for Odiham Common, stopping briefly to look at a native Black Poplar.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 14 – Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
    Wheelabrator Harewood Waste-to- Energy Facility Chapter 14 – Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Prepared for: WTI/EfW Holdings Ltd. AECOM Wheelabrator Harewood Waste-to- Energy Facility Table of Contents 14. Landscape and Visual ........................................................................ 14-3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 14-3 Legislation and planning policy context ......................................................................................... 14-3 Assessment Methodology ............................................................................................................. 14-6 Baseline Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 14-11 Design Measures and Impact Avoidance .................................................................................... 14-38 Assessment of Likely Impacts and Effects................................................................................... 14-39 Mitigation and Monitoring ............................................................................................................ 14-70 Residual effects .......................................................................................................................... 14-70 Cumulative Effects ...................................................................................................................... 14-78
    [Show full text]
  • Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty EAST HAMPSHIRE
    Appendix 2 – Letter from the East Hampshire Area of Outstanding Beauty East Hampshire AONB Office Queen Elizabeth Country Park Gravel Hill Area of Waterlooville Hampshire P08 OQE Outstanding Natural Beauty Telephone: (023) 9259 1362 EAST HAMPSHIRE Fax: (023) 9259 2409 Mobile: 07710 590863 E-mail: [email protected] FAO Guy Riddoch East Hampshire District Council Penns Place Petersfield Hampshire GU34 11 February 2004 Dear Sir Petersfield Project for Integrated Renewable Energy Deployment – Wind Turbine on Butser Hill As a follow up to the report by Econergy on the results of the Petersfield Study, it has come to our attention in the EHAONB office that your Council’s Development Panel will be considering a report that includes a proposal to erect a single wind turbine on top of the South Downs, possibly on Butser Hill. As I have yet to see the agenda I cannot confirm this myself, but in the meantime I have been asked by members of the Planning Panel to write and inform of their concerns on such a proposal. The East Hampshire Joint Advisory Committee is fully supportive of the Government's policy to promote the growth of renewable energy production, and welcomes the general thrust of the draft policy document PPS 22. However, as pointed out to the ODPM's office, whilst renewable energy schemes can bring undoubted benefits, they can also have undesirable impacts that need to be balanced against these general benefits. The Planning Panel have asked me to clarify that a single wind turbine comparable to size of the ones erected at Swaffham in Norfolk would be extremely prominent and intrusive if located on Butser Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • 3C: Itchen Valley
    3C: ITCHEN VALLEY Valley floor in downland setting between Itchen Abbas and Ovington. Permanent pasture, numerous small woods and scattered individual trees, few hedges. Ovington – Clear chalk streams, oftenValley floor– Lower reaches urban There are numerous historic mills wooded banks. edge, pony paddocks and wooded and bridges – along the Itchen. (from ridge backdrop at Bishopstoke. SDILCA) Cheriton – canalised section of theItchen Valley Country park; sluice as Playing fields with poplar windbreaks Itchen on the left. part of restored water meadows. in Lower Itchen Valley. Hampshire County 1 Status: FINAL May 2012 Integrated Character Assessment Itchen Valley Hampshire County 2 Status: FINAL May 2012 Integrated Character Assessment Itchen Valley 1.0 Location and Boundaries 1.1 This character area includes the river valley floor and its sides which make up the visual envelope of the valley. The valley tops are defined approximately where there is a break/slackening in slope angle. The southern boundary is formed at the County/Southampton unitary edge. The upper most reaches of the valley follow three spring fed tributaries/headwaters, which join close to New Arlesford namely the Candover stream to the north, River Arle to the east and Cheriton stream to the south. 1.2 Component County Landscape Types Open Downs, Downland Mosaic Large Scale, Downland Mosaic Small Scale, River Valley Floor, Lowland Mosaic Medium Scale, Lowland Mosaic Small Scale, Lowland Mosaic Heath Associated, Settlement. 1.3 Composition of Borough/District LCAs: Winchester CC Eastleigh BC Upper Itchen Valley Broom Hill Farmland and Woodland Lower Itchen Valley Upper Itchen Valley Floodplain Lower Itchen Valley Floodplain Eastleigh Airport Itchen Valley Sports Pitches The extent of the valley sides is comparable with the two Itchen valley character areas in the Winchester assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • North West Hampshire Downs
    7A: NORTH WEST HAMPSHIRE DOWNS View from Ashmansworth – ridge top settlement over undulating chalk landscape which is well wooded. High proportion of assarts across thisFields are often bound by woodland Rolling pasture and arable fields – landscape. and shaws. some with field trees. There tends to be a more mixed ageFaccombe – typical of small ridge top Some hamlets are located in dry of farmsteads in this downland hamlets in the character area valleys along roads which stretch up landscape compared with other from scarp to the north such as downland areas. Dunley or from the Wallops / Test . Hampshire County 1 Status: Final May 2012 Integrated Character Assessment North West Hampshire Downs . Hampshire County 2 Status: Final May 2012 Integrated Character Assessment North West Hampshire Downs 1.0 Location and Boundaries 1.1 This character area comprises the north western downs in Hampshire which form the upland context beyond the Swift and Bourne Rivulet valley. Its northern boundary is defined by the steep chalk scarp (LCA 5C) while to the south the landscape undergoes a transition to a more open chalk upland (LCA 8D). To the east the landscape is bordered by the Test Valley and in the north east it makes a gradual transition to more open downland (LCA 8A). To the west this landscape continues over the county boundary. Overall this is a fairly complex landscape as a result of its topographic variation and mosaic of land uses. It is unified by its pattern of woodland cover and mainly southerly orientation around the Swift Valley. 1.2 Component County Landscape Types Downland Mosaic Small Scale, Open Downs, Downland Mosaic Large Scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Formative Influences
    Chapter- 2 Formative Influences South Downs: Landscape Character Assessment October 2020 Chapter 2 Formative Influences Physical Influences Geology and Topography 2.1 The South Downs is dominated by a spine of Chalk that stretches from Winchester in the west to the cliffs of Beachy Head in the east. To the north of the Chalk the older sandy rocks of the Lower Greensand and soft shales of the Wealden Clays are exposed. The Chalk is separated from the Lower Greensand by a belt of low-lying ground marked by the Gault and a ‘terrace’ of Upper Greensand that lies at the foot of the Chalk scarp. To the south of the chalk the younger Tertiary rocks overlie the Chalk. The solid geology within in South Downs National Park can be viewed on the South Downs National Park LCA online map. The different rock formations are considered in chronological order below. The description includes the development of each rock formation, its composition, and its influence on the topography and character of the South Downs. A topographical map is also available on the LCA online map. Cretaceous rocks Wealden Series 2.2 The oldest rocks in the South Downs are those of the low lying clays of the Wealden Series that are exposed along the northern boundary of the study area. During the early part of the Cretaceous period, some 140 million years ago, a lake covered the area and it was during this time that the Wealden Clay was laid down. It consists of shales and mudstones with outcrops of siltstones, sandstones, shelly limestones and clay ironstones.
    [Show full text]
  • 23. Tees Lowlands Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 23. Tees Lowlands Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 23. Tees Lowlands Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment 1 2 3 White Paper , Biodiversity 2020 and the European Landscape Convention , we are North revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas (NCAs). These are areas East that share similar landscape characteristics, and which follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision- Yorkshire making framework for the natural environment. & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform their West decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a landscape East scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage broader Midlands partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will also help West Midlands to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. East of England Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key London drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental Opportunity (SEOs) are South East suggested, which draw on this integrated information. The SEOs offer guidance South West on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • Seascape Character Assessment Report
    Seascape Character Assessment for the South East Inshore marine plan area MMO 1134: Seascape Character Assessment for the South East Inshore marine plan area September 2018 Report prepared by: Land Use Consultants (LUC) Project funded by: European Maritime Fisheries Fund (ENG1595) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Version Author Note 0.1 Sally Marshall First draft desk-based report completed May 2015 Kate Ahern 1.0 Kate Ahern Updated draft final report following stakeholder consultation, August 2018 1.1 Chris Graham, MMO Comments David Hutchinson 2.0 Kate Ahern Final report, September 2018 2.1 Chris Sweeting Independent QA © Marine Management Organisation 2018 You may use and re-use the information featured on this website (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. Visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/ to view the licence or write to: Information Policy Team The National Archives Kew London TW9 4DU Email: [email protected] Information about this publication and further copies are available from: Marine Management Organisation Lancaster House Hampshire Court Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 7YH Tel: 0300 123 1032 Email: [email protected] Website: www.gov.uk/mmo Disclaimer This report contributes to the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) evidence base which is a resource developed through a large range of research activity and methods carried out by both MMO and external experts. The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of MMO nor are they intended to indicate how MMO will act on a given set of facts or signify any preference for one research activity or method over another.
    [Show full text]