DOCSLIB.ORG

Addressing Graph Products and Distance-Regular Graphs Sebastian M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Addressing Graph Products and Distance-Regular Graphs Sebastian M Discrete Applied Mathematics 229 (2017) 46–54 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Discrete Applied Mathematics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dam Addressing graph products and distance-regular graphs Sebastian M. Cioabă a, Randall J. Elzinga b,1 , Michelle Markiewitz a, Kevin Vander Meulen c,*, Trevor Vanderwoerd c,2 a Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716-2553, USA b Department of Mathematics, Royal Military College, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada c Department of Mathematics, Redeemer University College, Ancaster, ON L9K 1J4, Canada article info a b s t r a c t Article history: Graham and Pollak showed that the vertices of any connected graph G can be assigned Received 20 September 2016 t-tuples with entries in f0; a; bg, called addresses, such that the distance in G between Received in revised form 11 May 2017 any two vertices equals the number of positions in their addresses where one of the Accepted 31 May 2017 addresses equals a and the other equals b. In this paper, we are interested in determining Available online 1 July 2017 the minimum value of such t for various families of graphs. We develop two ways to obtain To the memory of David A. Gregory this value for the Hamming graphs and present a lower bound for the triangular graphs. ' 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Distance matrix Spectrum Triangular graphs Hamming graphs Graph addressing 1. Graph addressings A t-address is a t-tuple with entries in f0; a; bg. An addressing of length t for a graph G is an assignment of t-addresses to the vertices of G so that the distance between two vertices is equal to the number of locations in the addresses at which one of the addresses equals a and the other address equals b. For example, we have a 3-addressing of a graph in Fig. 1. Graham and Pollak [13] introduced such addressings, using symbols {∗; 0; 1g instead of f0; a; bg, in the context of loop switching networks. We are interested in the minimum t such that G has an addressing of length t. We denote such a minimum by N(G). Graham and Pollak [13,14] showed that N(G) equals the biclique partition number of the distance multigraph of G. Specifically, the distance multigraph of G, D(G), is the multigraph with the same vertex set as G where the multiplicity of any edge uv equals the distance between vertices u and v in G. The biclique partition number bp(H) of a multigraph H is the minimum number of complete bipartite subgraphs (bicliques) of H whose edges partition the edge set of H. This parameter and its covering variations have been studied by several researchers and appear in different contexts such as computational complexity or geometry (see for example, [8,13–16,19,21,22,25]). Graham and Pollak deduced that N(G) ≤ r(n − 1) for any connected graph G of order n and diameter r and conjectured that N(G) ≤ n − 1 for any connected graph G of order n. This conjecture, also known as the squashed cube conjecture, was proved by Winkler [24]. * Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (S.M. Cioabă), [email protected] (R.J. Elzinga), [email protected] (M. Markiewitz), [email protected] (K. Vander Meulen), [email protected] (T. Vanderwoerd). 1 Current address: Info-Tech Research Group, London, ON, N6B 1Y8, Canada. 2 Current address: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2017.05.018 0166-218X/' 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. S.M. Cioabă et al. / Discrete Applied Mathematics 229 (2017) 46–54 47 Fig. 1. A graph addressing of length 3. To bound N(G) below, Graham and Pollak used an eigenvalue argument on the adjacency matrix of D(G). Specifically, if M is a symmetric real matrix, let nC(M); n−(M), and n0(M) denote the number of eigenvalues of M (including multiplicity) that are positive, negative and zero, respectively. The inertia of M is the triple (nC(M); n0(M); n−(M)). The adjacency matrix of D(G) will be denoted by D(G); we will also refer to D(G) as the distance matrix of G. The inertia of distance matrices has been studied by various authors for many classes of graphs [3,17,18,26]. Witsenhausen (cf. [13,14]) showed that N(G) ≥ maxfnC(D(G)); n−(D(G))g: (1) Letting Jn denote the all one n × n matrix and In denote the n × n identity matrix, and observing that n−(D(Kn)) D n−(Jn − In), Graham and Pollak [13,14] used the bound (1) to conclude that N(Kn) D n − 1: (2) Graham and Pollak [13,14] also determined N(Kn;m) for many values of n and m. The determination of N(Kn;m) for all values of n and m was completed by Fujii and Sawa [11]. A more general addressing scheme, allowing the addresses to contain more than two different nonzero symbols, was recently studied by Watanabe, Ishii and Sawa [23]. The parameter N(G) has been determined when G is a tree or a cycle [14], as well as one particular triangular graph T4 [25], described in Section5. For the Petersen graph P, Elzinga, Gregory and Vander Meulen [10] showed that N(P) D 6. To the best of our knowledge, these are the only graphs G for which addressings of length N(G) have been determined. We will say a t-addressing of G is optimal if t D N(G). An addressing is eigensharp [19] if equality is achieved in (1). In this paper, we study optimal addressings of Cartesian graph products and the distance-regular graphs known as triangular graphs. Let H(n; q) be the Hamming graph whose vertices are the n-tuples over an alphabet with q letters with two n-tuples being adjacent if and only if their Hamming distance is 1. We give two different proofs showing that N(H(n; q)) D n(q − 1). This generalizes the Graham–Pollak result (2) since H(1; q) D Kq. We show that the triangular graphs are not eigensharp. 2. Addressing Cartesian products Let G D G1□G2□ ··· □Gk denote the Cartesian product of graphs G1; G2;:::; Gk. Then G has vertex set V (G) D f(v1; v2; : : : ; vk) j vi 2 V (Gi)g. Two vertices v D (v1; : : : ; vk) and u D (u1;:::; uk) of G are adjacent if for some index j, vj is adjacent to uj in Gj while vi D ui for all remaining indices i 6D j. Thus, if d and di denote distances between pairs of vertices in G and Gi respectively, then for every v; u 2 V (G), k X d(v; u) D di(vi; ui): (3) iD1 It follows that if each Gi, i D 1;:::; k, is given an addressing, then each vertex x of G may be addressed by concatenating the addresses of its components xi. Therefore, the parameter N is sub-additive on Cartesian products; that is, if G D G1□ ··· □Gk (4) then N(G) ≤ N(G1) C···C N(Gk): (5) ( ) ( ) C···C ≤ Pk − ≤ Qk − D − Note that N(G1) N(Gk) iD1ni k iD1ni 1 n 1. Thus (5) can improve on Winkler's upper bound of n − 1 when G is a Cartesian product. Question 2.1. Must equality hold in (5) for all choices of Gi? Remark 3.4 might provide a possible counterexample. 3. Distance matrices of cartesian products In this section we determine N(G) when G is the Cartesian product of complete graphs. We first develop some results about the inertia of the distance matrix of a Cartesian product.3 3 The approach we take is due to the late D.A. Gregory. 48 S.M. Cioabă et al. / Discrete Applied Mathematics 229 (2017) 46–54 If v1; : : : ; vn denote the vertices of a connected graph G, the distance matrix D(G) of G is the n × n matrix with entries D(G)ij D d(vi; vj). Because G is connected, its adjacency matrix A(G) and its distance matrix D(G) are irreducible symmetric nonnegative integer matrices and by the Perron–Frobenius Theorem (see [5, Proposition 3.1.1] or [12, Theorem 8.8.1]), the largest eigenvalue of each of these matrices has multiplicity 1. We call this largest eigenvalue the Perron value of the matrix and often denote it by ρ. To obtain a formula for the distance matrix of a Cartesian product of graphs, we will use an additive analogue of the Kronecker product of matrices. Note that if A is an n × m matrix and c 2 R, then c C A is the n × m matrix cJ C A with J n m the all one n × m matrix. Further, recall that if A is an n × n matrix and B an m × m matrix, with x 2 R , y 2 R , then the Kronecker products A ⊗ B and x ⊗ y are defined as 2a11B a12B ··· a1mB3 2x1y3 ··· 6a21B a22B a2mB7 6x2y7 A ⊗ B D 6 : : : 7 and x ⊗ y D 6 : 7 : (6) 4 : : : 5 4 : 5 am1B am2B ··· ammB xny For the additive analogue, we use the symbol ⋄ and define A ⋄ B and x ⋄ y as 2a11 C B a12 C B ··· a1m C B3 2x1 C y3 C C ··· C C 6a21 B a22 B a2m B7 6x2 y7 A ⋄ B D 6 : : : 7 and x ⋄ y D 6 : 7 : (7) 4 : : : 5 4 : 5 am1 C B am2 C B ··· amm C B xn C y If G D G1□G2□ ··· □Gk, then the additive property (3) implies that D(G) D D(G1) ⋄ D(G2) ⋄ · · · ⋄ D(Gk): (8) Note that G1□G2 is isomorphic to G2□G1 and, equivalently, D(G1) ⋄ D(G2) is permutationally similar to D(G2) ⋄ D(G1).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Investigations on Unit Distance Property of Clebsch Graph and Its Complement
    Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2012 Vol I WCE 2012, July 4 - 6, 2012, London, U.K. Investigations on Unit Distance Property of Clebsch Graph and Its Complement Pratima Panigrahi and Uma kant Sahoo ∗yz Abstract|An n-dimensional unit distance graph is on parameters (16,5,0,2) and (16,10,6,6) respectively. a simple graph which can be drawn on n-dimensional These graphs are known to be unique in the respective n Euclidean space R so that its vertices are represented parameters [2]. In this paper we give unit distance n by distinct points in R and edges are represented by representation of Clebsch graph in the 3-dimensional Eu- closed line segments of unit length. In this paper we clidean space R3. Also we show that the complement of show that the Clebsch graph is 3-dimensional unit Clebsch graph is not a 3-dimensional unit distance graph. distance graph, but its complement is not. Keywords: unit distance graph, strongly regular The Petersen graph is the strongly regular graph on graphs, Clebsch graph, Petersen graph. parameters (10,3,0,1). This graph is also unique in its parameter set. It is known that Petersen graph is 2-dimensional unit distance graph (see [1],[3],[10]). It is In this article we consider only simple graphs, i.e. also known that Petersen graph is a subgraph of Clebsch undirected, loop free and with no multiple edges. The graph, see [[5], section 10.6]. study of dimension of graphs was initiated by Erdos et.al [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Maximizing the Order of a Regular Graph of Given Valency and Second Eigenvalue∗
    SIAM J. DISCRETE MATH. c 2016 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 1509–1525 MAXIMIZING THE ORDER OF A REGULAR GRAPH OF GIVEN VALENCY AND SECOND EIGENVALUE∗ SEBASTIAN M. CIOABA˘ †,JACKH.KOOLEN‡, HIROSHI NOZAKI§, AND JASON R. VERMETTE¶ Abstract. From Alon√ and Boppana, and Serre, we know that for any given integer k ≥ 3 and real number λ<2 k − 1, there are only finitely many k-regular graphs whose second largest eigenvalue is at most λ. In this paper, we investigate the largest number of vertices of such graphs. Key words. second eigenvalue, regular graph, expander AMS subject classifications. 05C50, 05E99, 68R10, 90C05, 90C35 DOI. 10.1137/15M1030935 1. Introduction. For a k-regular graph G on n vertices, we denote by λ1(G)= k>λ2(G) ≥ ··· ≥ λn(G)=λmin(G) the eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix of G. For a general reference on the eigenvalues of graphs, see [8, 17]. The second eigenvalue of a regular graph is a parameter of interest in the study of graph connectivity and expanders (see [1, 8, 23], for example). In this paper, we investigate the maximum order v(k, λ) of a connected k-regular graph whose second largest eigenvalue is at most some given parameter λ. As a consequence of work of Alon and Boppana and of Serre√ [1, 11, 15, 23, 24, 27, 30, 34, 35, 40], we know that v(k, λ) is finite for λ<2 k − 1. The recent result of Marcus, Spielman, and Srivastava [28] showing the existence of infinite families of√ Ramanujan graphs of any degree at least 3 implies that v(k, λ) is infinite for λ ≥ 2 k − 1.
    [Show full text]
  • High Girth Cubic Graphs Map to the Clebsch Graph
    High Girth Cubic Graphs Map to the Clebsch Graph Matt DeVos ∗ Robert S´amalˇ †‡ Keywords: max-cut, cut-continuous mappings, circular chromatic number MSC: 05C15 Abstract We give a (computer assisted) proof that the edges of every graph with maximum degree 3 and girth at least 17 may be 5-colored (possibly improp- erly) so that the complement of each color class is bipartite. Equivalently, every such graph admits a homomorphism to the Clebsch graph (Fig. 1). Hopkins and Staton [8] and Bondy and Locke [2] proved that every (sub)cu- 4 bic graph of girth at least 4 has an edge-cut containing at least 5 of the edges. The existence of such an edge-cut follows immediately from the existence of a 5-edge-coloring as described above, so our theorem may be viewed as a kind of coloring extension of their result (under a stronger girth assumption). Every graph which has a homomorphism to a cycle of length five has an above-described 5-edge-coloring; hence our theorem may also be viewed as a weak version of Neˇsetˇril’s Pentagon Problem: Every cubic graph of sufficiently high girth maps to C5. 1 Introduction Throughout the paper all graphs are assumed to be finite, undirected and simple. For any positive integer n, we let Cn denote the cycle of length n, and Kn denote the complete graph on n vertices. If G is a graph and U ⊆ V (G), we put δ(U) = {uv ∈ E(G) : u ∈ U and v 6∈ U}, and we call any subset of edges of this form a cut.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Girth Cubic Graphs Are Homomorphic to the Clebsch
    High-girth cubic graphs are homomorphic to the Clebsch graph Matt DeVos ∗ Robert S´amalˇ †‡ Keywords: max-cut, cut-continuous mappings, circular chromatic number MSC: 05C15 Abstract We give a (computer assisted) proof that the edges of every graph with maximum degree 3 and girth at least 17 may be 5-colored (possibly improp- erly) so that the complement of each color class is bipartite. Equivalently, every such graph admits a homomorphism to the Clebsch graph (Fig. 1). Hopkins and Staton [11] and Bondy and Locke [2] proved that every 4 (sub)cubic graph of girth at least 4 has an edge-cut containing at least 5 of the edges. The existence of such an edge-cut follows immediately from the ex- istence of a 5-edge-coloring as described above, so our theorem may be viewed as a coloring extension of their result (under a stronger girth assumption). Every graph which has a homomorphism to a cycle of length five has an above-described 5-edge-coloring; hence our theorem may also be viewed as a weak version of Neˇsetˇril’s Pentagon Problem (which asks whether every cubic graph of sufficiently high girth is homomorphic to C5). 1 Introduction Throughout the paper all graphs are assumed to be finite, undirected and simple. For any positive integer n, we let Cn denote the cycle of length n, and Kn denote the complete graph on n vertices. If G is a graph and U ⊆ V (G), we put δ(U) = {uv ∈ E(G): u ∈ U and v 6∈ U}, and we call any subset of edges of this form a cut.
    [Show full text]
  • The Connectivity of Strongly Regular Graphs
    Burop. J. Combinatorics (1985) 6, 215-216 The Connectivity of Strongly Regular Graphs A. E. BROUWER AND D. M. MESNER We prove that the connectivity of a connected strongly regular graph equals its valency. A strongly regular graph (with parameters v, k, A, JL) is a finite undirected graph without loops or multiple edges such that (i) has v vertices, (ii) it is regular of degree k, (iii) each edge is in A triangles, (iv) any two.nonadjacent points are joined by JL paths of length 2. For basic properties see Cameron [1] or Seidel [3]. The connectivity of a graph is the minimum number of vertices one has to remove in oroer to make it disconnected (or empty). Our aim is to prove the following proposition. PROPOSITION. Let T be a connected strongly regular graph. Then its connectivity K(r) equals its valency k. Also, the only disconnecting sets of size k are the sets r(x) of all neighbours of a vertex x. PROOF. Clearly K(r) ~ k. Let S be a disconnecting set of vertices not containing all neighbours of some vertex. Let r\S = A + B be a separation of r\S (i.e. A and Bare nonempty and there are no edges between A and B). Since the eigenvalues of A and B interlace those of T (which are k, r, s with k> r ~ 0> - 2 ~ s, where k has multiplicity 1) it follows that at least one of A and B, say B, has largest eigenvalue at most r. (cf. [2], theorem 0.10.) It follows that the average valency of B is at most r, and in particular that r>O.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Automorphism Groups of Finite Graphs
    Quantum automorphism groups of finite graphs Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades des Doktors der Naturwissenschaften der Fakult¨atf¨urMathematik und Informatik der Universit¨atdes Saarlandes Simon Schmidt Saarbr¨ucken, 2020 Datum der Verteidigung: 2. Juli 2020 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Thomas Schuster Pr¨ufungsausschuss: Vorsitzende: Prof. Dr. Gabriela Weitze-Schmith¨usen Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Moritz Weber Prof. Dr. Roland Speicher Prof. Dr. Julien Bichon Akademischer Mitarbeiter: Dr. Tobias Mai ii Abstract The present work contributes to the theory of quantum permutation groups. More specifically, we develop techniques for computing quantum automorphism groups of finite graphs and apply those to several examples. Amongst the results, we give a criterion on when a graph has quantum symmetry. By definition, a graph has quantum symmetry if its quantum automorphism group does not coincide with its classical automorphism group. We show that this is the case if the classical automorphism group contains a pair of disjoint automorphisms. Furthermore, we prove that several families of distance-transitive graphs do not have quantum symmetry. This includes the odd graphs, the Hamming graphs H(n; 3), the Johnson graphs J(n; 2), the Kneser graphs K(n; 2) and all cubic distance-transitive graphs of order ≥ 10. In particular, this implies that the Petersen graph does not have quantum symmetry, answering a question asked by Banica and Bichon in 2007. Moreover, we show that the Clebsch graph does have quantum symmetry and −1 prove that its quantum automorphism group is equal to SO5 answering a question asked by Banica, Bichon and Collins. More generally, for odd n, the quantum −1 automorphism group of the folded n-cube graph is SOn .
    [Show full text]
  • Shannon Capacity and the Categorical Product
    Shannon capacity and the categorical product G´abor Simonyi∗ Alfr´edR´enyi Institute of Mathematics, Budapest, Hungary and Department of Computer Science and Information Theory, Budapest University of Technology and Economics [email protected] Submitted: Oct 31, 2019; Accepted: Feb 16, 2021; Published: Mar 12, 2021 © The author. Released under the CC BY-ND license (International 4.0). Abstract Shannon OR-capacity COR(G) of a graph G, that is the traditionally more of- ten used Shannon AND-capacity of the complementary graph, is a homomorphism monotone graph parameter therefore COR(F × G) 6 minfCOR(F );COR(G)g holds for every pair of graphs, where F × G is the categorical product of graphs F and G. Here we initiate the study of the question when could we expect equality in this in- equality. Using a strong recent result of Zuiddam, we show that if this \Hedetniemi- type" equality is not satisfied for some pair of graphs then the analogous equality is also not satisfied for this graph pair by some other graph invariant that has a much \nicer" behavior concerning some different graph operations. In particular, unlike Shannon OR-capacity or the chromatic number, this other invariant is both multiplicative under the OR-product and additive under the join operation, while it is also nondecreasing along graph homomorphisms. We also present a natural lower bound on COR(F × G) and elaborate on the question of how to find graph pairs for which it is known to be strictly less than the upper bound minfCOR(F );COR(G)g. We present such graph pairs using the properties of Paley graphs.
    [Show full text]
  • Spectral Graph Theory
    Spectral Graph Theory Max Hopkins Dani¨elKroes Jiaxi Nie [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Jason O'Neill Andr´esRodr´ıguezRey Nicholas Sieger [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Sam Sprio [email protected] Winter 2020 Quarter Abstract Spectral graph theory is a vast and expanding area of combinatorics. We start these notes by introducing and motivating classical matrices associated with a graph, and then show how to derive combinatorial properties of a graph from the eigenvalues of these matrices. We then examine more modern results such as polynomial interlacing and high dimensional expanders. 1 Introduction These notes are comprised from a lecture series for graduate students in combinatorics at UCSD during the Winter 2020 Quarter. The organization of these expository notes is as follows. Each section corresponds to a fifty minute lecture given as part of the seminar. The first set of sections loosely deals with associating some specific matrix to a graph and then deriving combinatorial properties from its spectrum, and the second half focus on expanders. Throughout we use standard graph theory notation. In particular, given a graph G, we let V (G) denote its vertex set and E(G) its edge set. We write e(G) = jE(G)j, and for (possibly non- disjoint) sets A and B we write e(A; B) = jfuv 2 E(G): u 2 A; v 2 Bgj. We let N(v) denote the neighborhood of the vertex v and let dv denote its degree. We write u ∼ v when uv 2 E(G).
    [Show full text]
  • Graphs and Semibiplanes by Jennifer A. Muskovin
    On (0,2)-graphs and Semibiplanes by Jennifer A. Muskovin (Under the direction of Lenny Chastkofsky) Abstract A semibiplane is a connected point-block incidence structure such that any two points are in either 0 or 2 common blocks and any two blocks have either 0 or 2 common neigh- bors. A (0,2)-graph is a connected graph such that any pair of vertices has either 0 or 2 common neighbors. The incidence graph of a semibiplane is a bipartite (0,2)-graph. In this paper we construct (0,2)-graphs from known graphs by taking Cartesian products, quotients and adding matchings and construct semibiplanes by taking quotients of finite projective planes. Index words: (0,2)-graph, Biplane, Hypercube, Projective Plane, Semibiplane On (0,2)-graphs and Semibiplanes by Jennifer A. Muskovin B.S., Benedictine University, 2007 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Athens, Georgia 2009 c 2009 Jennifer A. Muskovin All Rights Reserved On (0,2)-graphs and Semibiplanes by Jennifer A. Muskovin Approved: Major Professor: Lenny Chastkofsky Committee: Dino Lorenzini Robert Varley Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2009 Dedication To Mom and Papa iv Acknowledgments I would like to thank the faculty, staff and students within the Mathematics Department at UGA for encouraging me to finish writing. Specifically, thank you Lenny for giving me so much of your time this past year and for staying patient with me during my many struggles.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Cheeger Constant for Distance-Regular Graphs. Arxiv:1811.00230V2
    On the Cheeger constant for distance-regular graphs. Jack H. Koolen 1, Greg Markowsky 2 and Zhi Qiao 3 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 1Wen-Tsun Wu Key Laboratory of the CAS and School of Mathematical Sciences, USTC, Hefei, China 2Department of Mathematics, Monash University, Australia 3College of Mathematics and Software Science, Sichuan Normal University, China September 19, 2019 Abstract The Cheeger constant of a graph is the smallest possible ratio between the size of a subgraph and the λ1 size of its boundary. It is well known that this constant must be at least 2 , where λ1 is the smallest positive eigenvalue of the Laplacian matrix. The subject of this paper is a conjecture of the authors that for distance-regular graphs the Cheeger constant is at most λ1. In particular, we prove the conjecture for the known infinite families of distance-regular graphs, distance-regular graphs of diameter 2 (the strongly regular graphs), several classes of distance-regular graphs with diameter 3, and most distance-regular graphs with small valency. 1 Introduction The Cheeger constant hG of a graph G is a prominent measure of the connectivity of G, and is defined as arXiv:1811.00230v2 [math.CO] 18 Sep 2019 nE[S; Sc] jV (G)jo (1) h = inf jS ⊂ V (G) with jSj ≤ ; G vol(S) 2 where V (G) is the vertex set of G, vol(S) is the sum of the valencies of the vertices in S, Sc is the complement of S in V (G), jSj is the number of vertices in S, and for any sets A; B we use E[A; B] to denote the number of edges in G which connect a point in A with a point in B; to make this last definition more precise, let E(G) ⊆ V (G) × V (G) denote the edge set of G, and then E[A; B] = jf(x; y) 2 E(G) with x 2 A; y 2 Bgj; note that with this definition each edge (x; y) with x; y 2 A \ B will in essence be counted twice, and 1 c vol(S) = E[S; S] + E[S; S ].
    [Show full text]
  • Strongly Regular Graphs
    Strongly regular graphs Peter J. Cameron Queen Mary, University of London London E1 4NS U.K. Draft, April 2001 Abstract Strongly regular graphs form an important class of graphs which lie somewhere between the highly structured and the apparently random. This chapter gives an introduction to these graphs with pointers to more detailed surveys of particular topics. 1 An example Consider the Petersen graph: ZZ Z u Z Z Z P ¢B Z B PP ¢ uB ¢ uB Z ¢ B ¢ u Z¢ B B uZ u ¢ B ¢ Z B ¢ B ¢ ZB ¢ S B u uS ¢ B S¢ u u 1 Of course, this graph has far too many remarkable properties for even a brief survey here. (It is the subject of a book [17].) We focus on a few of its properties: it has ten vertices, valency 3, diameter 2, and girth 5. Of course these properties are not all independent. Simple counting arguments show that a trivalent graph with diameter 2 has at most ten vertices, with equality if and only it has girth 5; and, dually, a trivalent graph with girth 5 has at least ten vertices, with equality if and only it has diameter 2. The conditions \diameter 2 and girth 5" can be rewritten thus: two adjacent vertices have no common neighbours; two non-adjacent vertices have exactly one common neighbour. Replacing the particular numbers 10, 3, 0, 1 here by general parameters, we come to the definition of a strongly regular graph: Definition A strongly regular graph with parameters (n; k; λ, µ) (for short, a srg(n; k; λ, µ)) is a graph on n vertices which is regular with valency k and has the following properties: any two adjacent vertices have exactly λ common neighbours; • any two nonadjacent vertices have exactly µ common neighbours.
    [Show full text]
  • A Discussion About the Pentagon Problem
    Master Thesis Department of Mathematics A discussion about the Pentagon Problem Supervisors: Candidate: Prof. Benny Sudakov Domenico Mergoni Dr Stefan Glock Academic Year 2019-20 Abstract The Pentagon Conjecture [33] states that every cubic graph of suffi- ciently high girth admits a homomorphism to the cycle of length 5. In this thesis, we present some results related to the Pentagon Conjec- ture; we exploit the study of this problem to introduce some interesting methods such as the probabilistic method and local approaches, and to provide insights on many areas of combinatorics such as the study of the chromatic number. The Pentagon Conjecture presents many similarities to some problems which naturally arise in other areas of combinatorics such as the study of gaps in the order ≺ restricted to cubic graphs. For this reason, in the first sections of this thesis, we analyse the techniques that have recently brought positive results for problems related to the Pentagon Conjecture. We then use the obtained tools to approach some approximations of the Pentagon Problem. It is important to point out that our attention is mainly focused on ex- panding the reader's expertise on these topics and to present our attempt at working with the Pentagon Conjecture. Acknowledgement I would like to thank all the people who I felt near during the writing of this thesis. In particular, my advisors Stefan and Prof. Sudakov for their guidance and my relatives and friends who supported me in this time. 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Construction of random regular graphs and homomorphisms to cycles 5 2.1 Models of random regular graphs .
    [Show full text]