DOCSLIB.ORG

Xeneca Power Development Inc. Project Description Report Kapuskasing River Hydroelectric Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Xeneca Power Development Inc. Project Description Report Kapuskasing River Hydroelectric Project Xeneca Power Development Inc. Project Description Report Kapuskasing River Hydroelectric Project 336542-0000-07-124-0001 Rev. A November 2010 Xeneca Power Development Inc. - Kapuskasing River Hydroelectric Project Project Description Report Disclaimer This report has been prepared by Hatch Ltd. for the sole and exclusive use of Xeneca Power Development Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Xeneca” or the “Proponent”) for the purpose of assisting the management of Xeneca in making decisions with respect to the proposed development of a waterpower project and shall not be (a) used for any other purpose, or (b) provided to, relied upon or used by any third party. This report contains opinions, conclusions and recommendations made by Hatch Ltd. (Hatch), using its professional judgment and reasonable care. Any use of or reliance upon this report and estimate by the Proponent is subject to the following conditions: • the report being read in the context of and subject to the terms of the agreement between Hatch and Xeneca including any methodologies, procedures, techniques, assumptions and other relevant terms or conditions that were specified or agreed therein; • the report being read as a whole, with sections or parts hereof read or relied upon in context; • the conditions of the site may change over time (or may have already changed) due to natural forces or human intervention, and Hatch takes no responsibility for the impact that such changes may have on the accuracy or validity of the observations, conclusions and recommendations set out in this report; and • the report is based on information made available to Hatch by Xeneca and/or by certain third parties; and unless stated otherwise in the Agreement, Hatch has not verified the accuracy, completeness or validity of such information, makes no representation regarding its accuracy and hereby disclaims any liability in connection therewith. 336542-0000-07-124-0001, Rev. A, Page i © Hatch 2010/11 Xeneca Power Development Inc. - Kapuskasing River Hydroelectric Project Project Description Report Blank back 336542-0000-07-124-0001, Rev. A, Page ii © Hatch 2010/11 Xeneca Power Development Inc. - Kapuskasing River Hydroelectric Project Project Description Report Project Report November 3, 2010 Xeneca Power Development Inc. Kapuskasing River Hydroelectric Project DISTRIBUTION Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs Environment Canada Ministry of Culture Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) Ministry of Energy and Infrastructure Health Canada Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Indian and Northern Affairs Canada Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) Transport Canada (TC) Ministry of Transportation Infrastructure Canada Ministry of Northern Development, Mines and Forestry Corporation of the Town of Kapuskasing Ontario Waterpower Association Corporation of the Township of Chapleau Project Description Report Table of Contents 1. General Information ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 General....................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Name and Proposed Location of Project............................................................................ 1-1 1.1.2 Nature of the Project ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.3 Purpose of the Project ....................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.4 Economic Benefits of Project ............................................................................................. 1-2 1.1.5 Parties who Received the Project Description.................................................................... 1-2 1.1.6 Federal, Provincial and Municipal Agency and Stakeholder Consultations......................... 1-5 1.1.7 Other Environmental Assessment Processes....................................................................... 1-5 1.2 Contacts...................................................................................................................................... 1-6 1.2.1 Proponent and Contact Information................................................................................... 1-6 1.2.2 Proponent’s Consultant ..................................................................................................... 1-6 1.3 Land Ownership ......................................................................................................................... 1-7 1.4 Authorizations Required.............................................................................................................. 1-7 2. Project Information.............................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Kapuskasing Lake Outlet ............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.1 Description of Proposed Project ........................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.1.1 General ................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1.2 Summary of Hydraulic Characteristics ..................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1.3 Installed Capacity .................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1.4 Site Access .............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.1.5 Headworks Structures.............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.1.6 Conveyance System................................................................................................. 2-2 2.1.1.7 Powerhouse............................................................................................................. 2-2 336542-0000-07-124-0001, Rev. A, Page iii © Hatch 2010/11 Xeneca Power Development Inc. - Kapuskasing River Hydroelectric Project Project Description Report 2.1.1.8 Transmission ........................................................................................................... 2-2 2.1.1.9 Area of Inundation................................................................................................... 2-2 2.1.2 Operating Strategy for Project............................................................................................ 2-2 2.1.2.1 Type of Proposed Project......................................................................................... 2-2 2.1.2.2 Operating Strategy................................................................................................... 2-2 2.1.2.3 Water Management Plan ......................................................................................... 2-5 2.2 Lapinigam Rapids GS .................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.1 Description of Proposed Project ........................................................................................ 2-5 2.2.1.1 General ................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.2.1.2 Summary of Hydraulic Characteristics ..................................................................... 2-5 2.2.1.3 Installed Capacity .................................................................................................... 2-5 2.2.1.4 Site Access .............................................................................................................. 2-6 2.2.1.5 Headworks Structures.............................................................................................. 2-6 2.2.1.6 Conveyance System................................................................................................. 2-6 2.2.1.7 Powerhouse............................................................................................................. 2-6 2.2.1.8 Transmission ........................................................................................................... 2-6 2.2.1.9 Area of Inundation................................................................................................... 2-6 2.2.2 Operating Strategy for Project............................................................................................ 2-6 2.2.2.1 Type of Proposed Project......................................................................................... 2-6 2.2.2.2 Operating Strategy................................................................................................... 2-6 2.2.2.3 Water Management Plan ......................................................................................... 2-9 2.3 Middle Township Buchan ........................................................................................................... 2-9 2.3.1 Description of Proposed Project ........................................................................................ 2-9 2.3.1.1 General ................................................................................................................... 2-9 2.3.1.2 Summary of Hydraulic Characteristics ..................................................................... 2-9 2.3.1.3 Installed Capacity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kap Community Final Version
    COMMUNITY STRATEGIC PLAN 2016-2020 Photo by User: P199 at Wikimedia Commons Table of Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................... 5! 1.0 Introduction and Background .................................................................................................... 6! 1.1 Developing the Community Vision and Mission Statements ................................................. 6! 1.2 Vision Statement ..................................................................................................................... 6! 1.3 Mission Statement .................................................................................................................. 6! 2.0 Communications and Consultation ............................................................................................ 7! 2.1 Steering Committee ................................................................................................................ 8! 2.2 On-line Survey ........................................................................................................................ 8! 2.3 Focus Groups .......................................................................................................................... 9! 2.4 Interviews ............................................................................................................................... 9! 2.5 Public Consultation ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2015 Vol
    Summer 2015 Vol. 42 No. 2 Quarterly Journal of the Wilderness Canoe Association The crew on a beautiful day getting ready to head out on Racine Lake. From L to R: Gary Ataman, Ginger Louws, Larry Hicks, Matt Eberly, Jeff Haymer, Gary James, Mary Perkins, Richard Griffith. Chapleau River 2 013 by Richard Griffith For lovers of whitewater, Chapleau-Nemegosenda River spent the first night at Missinaibi Headwaters Outfitters. Provincial Park, west of Timmins, ON, presents a unique and Racine Lake is huge, and I’m sure that crossing it on a windy interesting loop. The two rivers flow north on their way to day would present a formidable challenge. Fortunately for us, James Bay, and run parallel to each other for about 90 km, starting out in warm weather on Canada Day 2013, it was a until they meet at Kapuskasing Lake. One can paddle down sheet of glass. Calm as it was, it still took a long time to one river and up the other, finishing close to the start, thus cross. minimizing the car shuttle. Good plan. That’s what we When we emerged from the lake, the river narrowed and, thought, but it didn’t quite work out that way. The trip was after some miles, practically disappeared into an almost im - capably led by Gary James. The other participants were Gary penetrable thicket of downed trees. We couldn’t find the cur - Ataman, Mary Perkins, Larry Hicks, Jeff Haymer, Matt rent. We couldn’t find the portage either, though we had a Eberly, Ginger Louws and myself.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report on Forest Management 2007/08
    Annual Report on Forest Management For the year April 1, 2007 to March 31, 2008 Minister of Natural Resources of the Province of Ontario To his Honour The Lieutenant-Governor of the Province of Ontario May it please your Honour The undersigned begs respectfully to present to your Honour the Annual Report on Forest Management for the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2007 and ending March 31, 2008. Linda Jeffrey Minister December, 2009 © 2009, Queen’s Printer for Ontario Printed in Ontario, Canada Single copies of this publication are available at no charge from the address noted below. Bulk orders may involve charges. ServiceOntario Publications Call: 1-800-668-9938 www.publications.serviceontario.ca Current publications of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, and price lists, are also available from this office. Telephone inquiries about ministry programs and services should be directed to the Natural Resources Information Centre: General Inquiry 1-800-667-1940 Renseignements en français 1-800-667­ 1840 FAX (705) 755-1677 Find the Ministry of Natural Resources on­ line at: www.mnr.gov.on.ca Cette publication est également disponible en français. 09/12/19 ISSN 1923-0540 (Online) Annual Report on Forest Management Annual Report on Forest Management - 2007/08 Table of Contents Chapter Topic Page # Executive Summary 13 Introduction 17 Chapter 1 Ontario's Forests 19 Forest Management Planning 22 Forest Information Manual 22 Chapter 2 Forest Products Industry 23 Summary of Forest Sector Revenues and Value Added - 2007/08 25 Summary of Forest
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a IAMGOLD Côté Gold Project Aboriginal Consultation Plan (Previously Submitted to the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines in 2013
    Summary of Consultation to Support the Côté Gold Project Closure Plan Côté Gold Project Appendix A IAMGOLD Côté Gold Project Aboriginal Consultation Plan (previously submitted to the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines in 2013 Stakeholder Consultation Plan (2013) TC180501 | October 2018 CÔTÉ GOLD PROJECT PROVINCIAL INDIVIDUAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE APPENDIX D PROPOSED STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION PLAN Submitted to: IAMGOLD Corporation 401 Bay Street, Suite 3200 Toronto, Ontario M5H 2Y4 Submitted by: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, a Division of AMEC Americas Limited 160 Traders Blvd. East, Suite 110 Mississauga, Ontario L4Z 3K7 July 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Provincial EA and Consultation Plan Requirements ........................................... 1-1 1.3 Federal EA and Consultation Plan Requirements .............................................. 1-2 1.4 Responsibility for Plan Implementation .............................................................. 1-3 2.0 CONSULTATION APPROACH ..................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Goals and Objectives ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Stakeholder Identification ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profiles for the Oneca Education And
    FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 Political/Territorial Facts About This Community Phone Number First Nation and Address Nation and Region Organization or and Fax Number Affiliation (if any) • Census data from 2006 states Aamjiwnaang First that there are 706 residents. Nation • This is a Chippewa (Ojibwe) community located on the (Sarnia) (519) 336‐8410 Anishinabek Nation shores of the St. Clair River near SFNS Sarnia, Ontario. 978 Tashmoo Avenue (Fax) 336‐0382 • There are 253 private dwellings in this community. SARNIA, Ontario (Southwest Region) • The land base is 12.57 square kilometres. N7T 7H5 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 506 residents. Alderville First Nation • This community is located in South‐Central Ontario. It is 11696 Second Line (905) 352‐2011 Anishinabek Nation intersected by County Road 45, and is located on the south side P.O. Box 46 (Fax) 352‐3242 Ogemawahj of Rice Lake and is 30km north of Cobourg. ROSENEATH, Ontario (Southeast Region) • There are 237 private dwellings in this community. K0K 2X0 • The land base is 12.52 square kilometres. COPYRIGHT OF THE ONECA EDUCATION PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM 1 FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 406 residents. • This Algonquin community Algonquins of called Pikwàkanagàn is situated Pikwakanagan First on the beautiful shores of the Nation (613) 625‐2800 Bonnechere River and Golden Anishinabek Nation Lake. It is located off of Highway P.O. Box 100 (Fax) 625‐1149 N/A 60 and is 1 1/2 hours west of Ottawa and 1 1/2 hours south of GOLDEN LAKE, Ontario Algonquin Park.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Ontario Hunting Regulations Summary Complete
    A MESSAGE from the Government of Ontario unting has long been a popular outdoor activity for thousands of Ontario residents and visitors to the province. Each year, Havid hunters take to the field in pursuit of waterfowl, deer, moose and other quarry. Hunter support is key to the success of Ontario’s wildlife management programs. This can include everything from actively participating in resource management such as habitat improvement projects to responding to harvest surveys. The sustainable management of the province’s wildlife populations allows for the continued expansion of hunting opportunities, where appropriate. This year, the ministry is updating Ontario’s Wild Turkey Management Plan to provide long-term guidance for management of this species as part of southern and central Ontario’s biodiversity. The tremendous success of wild turkey restoration has seen populations thriving in suitable habitats. A fall turkey season has been proposed in numerous Wildlife Management Units (WMUs) in southern Ontario. New spring turkey seasons in three central Ontario WMUs are in place for 2008. ATTENTION NON-RESIDENT HUNTERS A broad review of Ontario’s moose program is now underway, with special emphasis this year on updating the moose policy and Non-resident Outdoors Card population management tools. There will also be preliminary The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has discussions on enhancements to the moose draw system this year and embarked on a project to improve the way that more in-depth discussions in early 2009. The goal is to ensure that the hunting and fishing licences are sold, including the province’s moose management program remains modern and world- development of an automated licence system for class and that it responds to environmental changes and societal needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ontario Mills2018
    2018 Mills in Northern Ontario Whitefeather Forest Red Lake Forest ¯ Trout Lake Forest *# Ogoki Forest Whiskey Jack Forest Islington 29 Caribou Forest *# Lac Seul Forest Wabigoon Forest Kenora ForestKenora *# *#*#*# Wabigoon Forest *# Dryden*# Forest Whiskey Jack Forest *# *# Dryden ForestEnglish River Forest Wabigoon Forest *# Kiashke Zaaging Anishinaabek Kenogami Forest Animbiigoo Zaagi'igan Anishinaabek*# *# *# Hwy. 11 Black Spruce ForestBingwi Neyaashi Anishinaabek Hearst Forest*#*# Sapawe Forest Crossroute Forest Lake Nipigon Forest Big Pic Forest Kapuskasing Seine River 22A2 *#*# *# *#*# Abitibi River Forest *#*#Dog River-Matawin Forest *# *# Pic River Forest Nagagami Forest Gordon Cosens Forest *#Cochrane *# Pic River Forest *# Iroquois Falls Lakehead Forest*#Thunder Bay *#*#*# White River*# Forest Val GagnéMonteith Magpie Forest Flying Post First NationTimmins *# Ramore *#*# Matheson Michipicoten First Nation Hwy. 101 Kirkland Lake Romeo Malette Forest Larder Lake Wawa Martel Forest *#*# Virginiatown Michipicoten First Nation Matachewan Chapleau Timiskaming Forest Mattagami First Nation Charlton Chapleau Cree*# First Nation *#Earlton 020 40 80 120 160 Brunswick House First Nation Gogama GowgandaThornloe *#Elk Lake Kilometers Pineland ForestShining Tree #Temiskaming Shores Westree *#Hwy 144 *# Legend Temagami Forest Algoma Forest Temagami # Not Operating *# Spanish Forest 11 Hwy. Sault Ste Marie *# *# 2023 Expiry *# Sudbury ForestSudbury*# Northshore Forest Hwy. *#17 *#Espanola *#*# North Bay *# 2022 Expiry *# *# Nipissing Forest*# *#*# *# 2021 Expiry *#*# *# Algonquin Park Forest*# *# Hwy. 11 2020 Expiry *#*#*#*#*# French-Severn*# Forest*# *# *# 2019 Expiry *# *# *#*# *# Highway Bancroft-Minden*# Forest Indian Reserve *#*# Mazinaw-Lanark Forest*#*# Forest Management Units Barrie *# *# *#*#*# *# *# *#*#.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Report Ivanhoe River
    Draft Environmental Report Ivanhoe River - The Chute and Third Falls Hydroelectric Generating Station Projects Revised May 2013 The Chute and Third Falls Draft Environmental Report May 2013 Insert “Foreword” i The Chute and Third Falls Draft Environmental Report May 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Waterpower in Ontario ................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Introduction to Project .................................................................................................. 1 1.2.1 Zone of Influence .................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Overview of the Environmental Screening Process ........................................................ 4 1.4 Approach to the Environmental Screening Process ........................................................ 5 1.4.1 Legal Framework ................................................................................................... 6 1.4.2 Characterize Local Environment of Proposed Development ................................... 7 1.4.3 Identify Potential Environmental Effects ................................................................. 8 1.4.4 Identify Required Mitigation, Monitoring or Additional Investigations ................... 8 1.4.5 Agency and Public Consultation and Aboriginal Communities Engagement ............ 8 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Electricity Planning in the North & East of Sudbury Region
    IESO Engagement From: IESO Engagement Sent: June 30, 2021 10:23 AM Subject: Regional Electricity Planning in the North & East of Sudbury Region Regional electricity planning activities have begun for the North & East of Sudbury region. A public webinar is scheduled for July 19 at 2:00 p.m. to provide an overview of the electricity planning process, the needs that have been identified for this area, and to seek input on the draft Scoping Assessment report that will determine the most appropriate planning approach going forward to meet the needs. To register, email [email protected]. A draft copy of the report will be shared for review in advance of the webinar and written comments will be invited until August 3. All interested parties are invited to participate including, but not limited to, local municipalities, Indigenous communities, businesses, stakeholders and members of the general public. Visit the engagement webpage for more information. The North & East of Sudbury region is defined by electrical infrastructure boundaries, and the area is roughly bordered by the Town of Moosonee to the north, Town of Hearst to the northwest, Municipality of East Ferris to the south, and Town of Kirkland Lake to the East. The region also includes the Indigenous communities of Constance Lake First Nation, Flying Post First Nation, Matachewan First Nation, Mattagami First Nation, Missanabie Cree, Moose Cree First Nation, Nipissing First Nation, Taykwa Tagamou First Nation, Temagami First Nation, Wahgoshig First Nation and Wahnapitae First Nation. The IESO will work with electricity sector partners (including transmitters and local distribution companies), communities, stakeholders, and other interested parties to help define the specific needs and explore possible solutions though the regional electricity planning process.
    [Show full text]
  • Rails Across Canada
    Rails across Canada American Museum of Natural History American Museum of Natural History Rails across Canada On the rails 1 Vancouver-Kamloops • Kamloops-Jasper • Jasper-Edmonton; Edmonton-Winnipeg • Winnipeg-Sudbury • Sudbury-Montreal Canadian basics 37 Government • Population • Language • Time zones • Metric system • Media • Taxes • Food • Separatist movement Early Canada 41 Petroglyphs and pictographs • The buffalo jump at Wanuskewin • Ancient and modern indigenous cultures Modern history: Cartier to Chrêtien 49 Chronology • The fur traders: Hudson's Bay Company and the North West Company • Railway history: The building of the transcontinental railway; The Grand Trunk Pacific Railroad & Canadian National Railways Index 68 On the rails Jasper Edmonton Kamloops Vancouver Saskatoon Winnipeg Thunder Bay Montreal Fort Frances Ottawa 2 • Rails across Canada Vancouver to Kamloops Vancouver Contrary to all logic, Vancouver is not on Vancouver Island. Instead, it sits beau- tifully on a mainland peninsula with the ocean before it and the Rockies behind. Its mild climate and inspiring scenery may have contributed a good deal to the laid-back demeanor of its inhabitants, who, Canadians are fond of saying, are more Californian in their outlook than Canadian. Vancouver's view out towards the Pacific is appropriate, for the last two decades "British Columbia is its own ineffable self have seen an extraordinary influx of investment and immigration from the Orient, because it pulls the protective blanket notably Hong Kong. Toronto and the Prairies are much further away, to Van- of the Rockies over its head couver's way of thinking, than are Sydney or Seoul. Vancouver is Canada's third and has no need to look out.
    [Show full text]
  • Pancon Partners with Flying Post First Nation on Montcalm, Gambler and Nova Projects
    Pancon Partners with Flying Post First Nation on Montcalm, Gambler and Nova Projects October 11, 2018Source ( ) — Pancontinental Resources Corporation (TSXV: PUC) (“Pancon” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce its signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), effective October 1, 2018, with the Flying Post First Nation (FPFN) in northern Ontario. The FPFN- Pancon MOU provides a mutually beneficial framework for cooperation on the Company’s three battery metals exploration projects, located 65 kilometres northwest of Timmins: the Montcalm Project, the Gambler Project, and the Nova Project. Murray Ray, Chief of Flying Post First Nation stated: “Flying Post is pleased with the signing of the MOU. The agreement outlines a process for mutual engagement throughout the exploration phase. Flying Post believes that exploration activities should be done in a manner that is respectful of traditional and treaty rights and the environment, and provide employment and business opportunities. The signing of this MOU is a promising first step in establishing a meaningful relationship with Pancon.” Layton Croft, Pancon President and CEO, stated: “We look forward to a productive, long-term relationship with the Flying Post First Nation as we advance our Montcalm, Gambler and Nova projects near Timmins. This MOU is a tangible example of Pancon’s Community Relations Policy, which affirms our Company’s belief that minerals exploration and mining — in addition to creating value for shareholders — can and should be a positive catalyst for environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Conditions in Ontario, 2011 Forest Health Conditions in Ontario, 2011
    Forest Health Conditions in Ontario, 2011 Forest Health Conditions in Ontario, 2011 Edited by: T.A. Scarr1, K.L. Ryall2, and P. Hodge3 1 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Forests Branch, Forest Health & Silviculture Section, Sault Ste. Marie, ON 2 Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, ON 3 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Science and Information Branch, Inventory, Monitoring and Assessment Section, Sault Ste. Marie, ON © 2012, Queen’s Printer for Ontario For more information on forest health in Ontario visit the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources website: www.ontario.ca/foresthealth You can also visit the Canadian Forest Service website: www.glfc.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca Telephone inquiries can be directed to the Natural Resources Information Centre: English/Français: 1-800-667-1940 Email: [email protected] 52095 ISSN 1913-6164 (print) ISBN 978-1-4435-8489-0 (2011 ed., print) ISSN 1913-617X (online) ISBN 978-1-4435-8490-6 (2011 ed., pdf) Front Cover Photos: Circular photos top to bottom – Diplodia tip blight (W. Byman), Snow damage (S. Young), Emerald ash borer galleries (P.Hodge), Spruce budworm (W. Byman), Forestry workshop in Algonquin Park (P.Hodge). Background: Severe defoliation caused by forest tent caterpillar in Bancroft District (P. Hodge). Banner: Hardwood forest in autumn (P.Hodge). Forest Health Conditions in Ontario, 2011 Dedication We are proud to dedicate this report to the memory of our friend, colleague, and mentor, Dr. Peter de Groot, 1954-2010. Peter was a long-time supporter of forest health, forest entomology, and forest management in Ontario and Canada.
    [Show full text]