DOCSLIB.ORG

Danielson’S Framework for Teaching (2011) Correlation to Special Education High Leverage Practices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Danielson’S Framework for Teaching (2011) Correlation to Special Education High Leverage Practices Danielson’s Framework for Teaching (2011) Correlation to Special Education High Leverage Practices Danielson Framework High Leverage Practices for SPED Comments DOMAIN 1: Planning and Preparation 1a Demonstrating Knowledge of HLP 4 Indicators: Content and Pedagogy Use multiple sources of information to Lesson and unit plans that reflect important • Content knowledge develop a comprehensive understanding concepts in the discipline • Prerequisite relationships of a student’s strengths and needs. Lesson and unit plans that accommodate • Content pedagogy prerequisite relationships among concepts and skills Clear and accurate classroom explanations Accurate answers to student questions Feedback to students that furthers learning Interdisciplinary connections in plans and practice 1b Demonstrating Knowledge of HLP 13 Indicators: Students Adapt curriculum tasks and materials for Formal and informal information about • Child development specific learning goals. students gathered by teacher for use in • Learning process HLP 4 planning instruction • Special needs Use multiple sources of information to Student interests and needs learned and used • Student skills, knowledge, and develop a comprehensive understanding by teacher in planning proficiency of a student’s strengths and needs. Teacher participation in community cultural • Interests and cultural heritage HPL 10 events Conduct functional behavioral Teacher-designed opportunities for families to assessments to develop individual share heritage student behavior plans. Teacher-created database of students with special needs available for teacher use 1c Setting Instructional Outcomes HLP 11 Indicators: • Value, sequence, and alignment Identify and prioritize long and short- Outcomes of a challenging cognitive level • Clarity term learning goals. Statements of student learning, not student • Balance HLP 6 activity • Suitability for diverse learners Use student assessment data, analyze Outcomes central to the discipline and related instructional practices, and make to those in other disciplines necessary adjustments that improve Assessment of student attainment student outcomes. Outcomes differentiated for students of varied ability Danielson’s Framework for Teaching (2011) Correlation to Special Education High Leverage Practices Danielson Framework High Leverage Practices for SPED Comments DOMAIN 1: Planning and Preparation 1d Demonstrating Knowledge of HLP 13 Indicators: Resources Adapt curriculum tasks and materials for District-provided materials • For classroom specific learning goals. A range of texts • To extend content knowledge HLP 4 Guest speakers • Resources for students Use multiple sources of information to Internet resources develop a comprehensive understanding Materials provided by professional of a student’s strengths and needs. organizations Teachers participating in continuing professional education courses or professional groups Community resources 1e Designing Coherent Instruction HLP 12 Indicators: • Learning activities Systemically design instruction toward a Lessons that support instructional outcomes • Instructional materials and specific learning goal. and reflect important concepts resources HLP 13 Instructional maps that indicate relationships • Instructional groups Adapt curriculum tasks and materials for to prior learning • Lesson and unit structure specific learning goals. Activities that represent high-level thinking HLP 15 Opportunities for student choice Provide scaffolded supports. The use of varied resources Thoughtfully planned learning groups Structured lesson plans 1f Designing Student Assessments HLP 13 Indicators: • Congruence with instructional Adapt curriculum tasks and materials for Lesson plans indicating correspondence outcomes specific learning goals. between assessments and instructional • Criteria and standards HLP 6 outcomes • Design of formative assessments Use student assessment data, analyze Assessment types suitable to the style of • Use for future planning instructional practices, and make outcome necessary adjustments that improve Variety of performance opportunities for student outcomes. students Modified assessments available for individual students as needed Danielson’s Framework for Teaching (2011) Correlation to Special Education High Leverage Practices Danielson Framework High Leverage Practices for SPED Comments DOMAIN 1: Planning and Preparation HPL 10 Conduct functional behavioral Expectations clearly written, with descriptors assessments to develop individual for each level of performance student behavior plans. Formative assessments designed to inform minute-to-minute decision making by the teacher during instruction Danielson Framework High Leverage Practices for SPED Comments DOMAIN 2: The Classroom Environment 2a Creating an Environment of Respect HLP 7 Indicators: and Rapport Establish a consistent, organized, and Respectful talk and turn taking • Teacher interaction with students respectful learning environment. Respect for students’ background and life • Student interaction with students HLP 9 outside the classroom Teach Social Skills Teacher and student body language Physical proximity Warmth and caring Politeness Encouragement Active listening Fairness 2b Establishing a Culture for Learning HLP 21 Indicators: • Importance of content Teach students to maintain and High expectations, supported through both • Expectations for learning and generalize new learning across time and verbal and nonverbal behaviors achievement settings. Expectation and recognition of quality • Student pride in work HLP 22 Expectation and recognition of effort and Provide positive and constructive persistence feedback to guide students’ learning and Confidence in students’ ability evident in behavior. teacher’s and students’ language and HLP 7 behaviors Establish a consistent, organized, and Expectation for all students to participate respectful learning environment. Danielson’s Framework for Teaching (2011) Correlation to Special Education High Leverage Practices Danielson Framework High Leverage Practices for SPED Comments DOMAIN 2: The Classroom Environment HLP 8 Provide positive and constructive feedback to guide students’ learning and behavior. 2c Managing Classroom Procedures HLP 7 Indicators: • Instructional groups Establish a consistent, organized, and Smooth functioning of all routines • Transitions respectful learning environment Little or no loss of instructional time • Materials and supplies Students playing an important role in carrying • Performance of Classroom out the routines Routines-non instructional duties Students knowing what to do, where to move • Supervision of volunteers and paraprofessionals 2d Managing Student Behavior HLP 7 Indicators: • Expectations Establish a consistent, organized, and Clear standards of conduct, possibly posted, • Monitoring student behavior respectful learning environment. and possibly referred to during a lesson • Response to student misbehavior HLP 8 Absence of acrimony between teacher and Provide positive and constructive students concerning behavior feedback to guide students’ learning and Teacher awareness of student conduct behavior. Preventive action when needed by the teacher HLP 9 Fairness Teach Social Skills Absence of misbehavior HPL 10 Reinforcement of positive behavior Conduct functional behavioral assessments to develop individual student behavior plans. 2e Organizing Physical Space HLP 19 Indicators: • Safety and accessibility Use assistive and instructional Pleasant, inviting atmosphere • Arrangement of furniture and technologies. Safe environment resources Accessibility for all students • Effective use of resources including Furniture arrangement suitable for the learning technology for both teacher and activities students Danielson’s Framework for Teaching (2011) Correlation to Special Education High Leverage Practices Danielson Framework High Leverage Practices for SPED Comments DOMAIN 2: The Classroom Environment Effective use of physical resources, including computer technology, by both teacher and students Danielson Framework High Leverage Practices for SPED Comments DOMAIN 3: Instruction 3a Communicating With Students HLP 14 Indicators: • Expectations for learning Teach cognitive and metacognitive Clarity of the purpose of the lesson • Directions and procedures strategies to support learning and Clear directions and procedures specific to the • Explanations of content independence. lesson activities • Use of oral and written language HLP 16 Absence of content errors and clear Use explicit instruction. explanations of concepts HLP 20 Students comprehension of content Provide Intensive Instruction. Correct and imaginative use of language 3b Using Questioning and Discussion HLP 16 Indicators: Techniques Teachers make content, skills, and Questions of high cognitive challenge, at the • Quality of questions/prompts concepts explicit by showing and telling student’s level of learning • Discussion techniques students what to do or think while solving Questions with multiple correct answers, or • Student participation problems. multiple approaches even when there is a single correct response Effective use of student responses and ideas 3c Engaging Students in Learning HLP 14 Indicators: • Activities and assignments Teach cognitive and metacognitive Activities aligned with the goals of the lesson • Grouping of students strategies to support learning and Student enthusiasm, interest, thinking,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Special Education
    Undergraduate Special Education Degrees Available at SIUE School of Education, Health and • Bachelor of Science, Special Education Human Behavior Special Education at SIUE Department of Teaching and Learning The special education program at SIUE is a nationally recognized program delivered through a collaborative partnership agreement between SIUE and public school districts. Classroom teachers and university professors work together to provide special education candidates a unique opportunity to regularly interact with children with disabilities from pre-K to age 21. In the School of Education, Health and Human Behavior, we combine classroom instruction and ample opportunities for practical experiences in a variety of settings. In conjunction with the early childhood program, the special education program also provides courses required for early childhood special education approval. The special education program offers Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation-approved programs at the undergraduate level for teaching licensure as a learning behavior specialist (LBS I). Diversity Statement SIUE’s teacher education programs foster teacher candidates’ ability to understand and meet professional responsibilities by modeling respect and value for diversity. Candidates create and engage their students in practices that develop awareness, understanding, respect and a valuing of the forms of diversity that exist in society and their importance Faculty in learning and teaching. The School of Education, Health and Human Behavior teacher Faculty in the special education program education programs are dedicated to supporting all teacher education candidates, in the School of Education, Health and regardless of their economic or social status, and advocates for the rights of students free Human Behavior represent a diverse group from discrimination based on race, color, ethnic origin, national origin, creed, religion, of professional educators and exemplary political belief, sex, sexual orientation, gender identification, ability or age.
    [Show full text]
  • Inclusive Education and Critical Pedagogy at the Intersections of Disability, Race, Gender and Class
    Inclusive education and critical pedagogy at the intersections of disability, race, gender and class Anastasia Liasidou European University, Cyprus Abstract The paper aims to use insights from critical pedagogy to forge and exemplify links with the movement of educational inclusion. The struggles for change, theorised in terms of the emancipatory and liberating potential of schooling, set out the conceptual and analytical backdrop against which issues of exclusion and marginalisation are discussed and reflected upon. The emancipatory and transformative roles of schools, as sites of power interplays at the interstices of disability, race, socioeconomic background and gender, are placed at the core of the analytical framework, with a view to highlighting the contextual and political ways against which notions of “need” and “disadvantage” are constructed, reified and perpetuated in dominant conceptualisations of schooling and pedagogy. It is suggested that the emancipatory potential of schooling entails transcending traditional constructions and arbitrations of the “ideal student”, embodied in Western-centric and neoliberal constructions of pedagogical discourse. The notion of intersectionality, as perceived and exemplified in relation to insights from critical pedagogy and critical disability studies, is presented as an emancipatory theoretical and analytical tool in interrogating and deconstructing educational discourses of individual and social pathology that evoke and legitimize the constitution of the “non-ideal student” in current schooling. Key words: Inclusion, Critical Pedagogy, disability, justice, equality, power. Introduction Currently, educational inclusion constitutes an international policy imperative that promotes the rights of disabled children to be educated alongside their peers in mainstream classrooms (Armstrong and Barton 2007;Kenworthy and Whittaker 2000; Rioux 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Special Education Processes + Procedural Safeguards
    Louisiana’s Educational Rights of Children with Disabilities Special Education Processes + Procedural Safeguards January 2020 For further information, contact: The mission of the Louisiana Department of Education (LDOE) is to ensure equal access to education and to promote equal excellence throughout the state. The LDOE is committed to providing Equal Employment Opportunities and is committed to ensuring that all of its programs and facilities are accessible to all members of the public. The LDOE does not discriminate on the basis of age, color, disability, national origin, race, religion, sex, or genetic information. Inquiries concerning the LDOE’s compliance with Title IX and other civil rights laws may be directed to the Attorney, LDOE, Office of the General Counsel, P.O. Box 94064, Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9064; 877.453.2721 or [email protected]. Infor- mation about the federal civil rights laws that apply to the LDOE and other educational institutions is available on the website for the Office of Civil Rights, USDOE, at http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/. Table of Contents Introduction and Purpose ...............................................................................................................1 Special Education and Related Services ............................................................................................1 Referral for Evaluation ..................................................................................................................2 Evaluation ....................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Special Education Certification
    OCTOBER 2010 LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Table of Contents Overview of Special Education Certification ........................ 2 Routes to Attaining Special Education Certification ............. 3 Special Education Add-On Endorsements ............................. 7 Professional Development ................................................. 11 Targeting Special Education Certification .......................... 12 National Board Teacher Certification (NBTC) ...................... 13 Contact Information .......................................................... 14 SPECIAL EDUCATION CERTIFICATION 1 Routes to Attaining Overview of Special Education Certification Special Education Certification The purpose of this booklet is to inform Traditional Undergraduate Programs certified teachers and prospective teachers of the opportunities in Louisiana to add special A traditional teacher preparation program is offered exclusively through an education areas to existing certificates and the institution of higher education. Teacher candidates earn a Bachelor of Arts or process to gain initial certification as a special Bachelor of Science degree that includes general education courses, one or more education teacher. Information is also provided subject focus areas, professional education courses, supervised field experiences, for capacity-building professional development and student teaching in a school setting under the supervision of a classroom and National Board Certification. teacher and supervisor from the university. In order to create
    [Show full text]
  • Inclusive Vision Versus Special Education Reality
    education sciences Article Inclusive Vision Versus Special Education Reality James M. Kauffman 1,* and Garry Hornby 2,* 1 Department of Special Education, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA 2 Institute of Education, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.M.K.); [email protected] (G.H.) Received: 14 August 2020; Accepted: 17 September 2020; Published: 22 September 2020 Abstract: The reasons are examined for the disparity between the inclusive vision espoused by Article 24 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the reality of the limited extent of inclusion in education systems worldwide. First, the leadership of key senior academics in the field of special education is considered to have been misguided in promoting a vision of full inclusion despite the lack of research evidence for the benefits of inclusive education over traditional special education provision. Second, attitudes toward and the treatment of people with disabilities have a long and complex history, and in this, many proponents of inclusion have been critical of 20th century special education. In particular, they claim that the sorting, labelling and categorizing required by special education have negative implications. Third, educators have been encouraged to imagine a system of education that is limitless, in the sense that all children with disabilities can be included in general education. This is because it is envisaged that general education classrooms will become so flexible that there will be no limits to the accommodation of students with disabilities, regardless of the nature or severity of their special educational needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Inclusive Pedagogy and Knowledge in Special Education
    TIED1044203 Techset Composition India (P) Ltd., Bangalore and Chennai, India 5/6/2015 International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1044203 5 Inclusive pedagogy and knowledge in special education: addressing the tension ∗ Joseph Mintz and Dominic Wyse 10 Department of Early Years and Primary Education, Institute of Education, University College London, 120 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, UK AQ2 ¶ (Received 8 July 2014; accepted 3 March 2015) 15 There has been an increasing focus in policy and practice on adopting inclusive pedagogy as a way of reconceptualising how schools work with children with special educational needs (SEN). The paper considers the split between knowledge and pedagogy inherent in some dominant strains of inclusive pedagogy. Drawing on the ‘knowledge turn’ in curriculum studies, we argue that although an analytical distinction between knowledge and pedagogy may be 20 useful, too strong a delineation between the two fails to best serve the needs of children with special needs. Specific implications for teacher education in relation to SEN in England are considered. Keywords: inclusion; special educational needs; pedagogy; inclusive pedagogy 25 Inclusive pedagogy and knowledge: addressing the tension AQ3 ¶ In the modern classroom, children’s needs are diverse, complex and recognised as such; yet, progressive and neo-liberal conceptions of the purpose of activity in the classroom often have an uneasy coexistence both in the structures of the school and in the mind of 30 the teacher. The tension between instrumentalist approaches to the role of the teacher, and alternative, broader conceptualizations of the purposes of education are often most CE: KRK QA: Coll: clearly seen when classrooms contain children perceived as differing from the norm.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Parent Guide to Special Education for School-Age Children
    Pennsylvania Parent Guide to Special Education for School-Age Children INTRODUCTION Parents are very important participants in the special education process. Parents know their child better than anyone else and have valuable information to contribute about the kinds of programs and services that are needed for their child’s success in school. To ensure the rights of children with a disability, additional laws have been enacted. In this guide we use the terms “rules” and “regulations.” This booklet has been written to explain these rules so parents will feel comfortable and can better participate in the educational decision-making process for their child. The chapters that follow address questions that parents may have about special education, relating to their child who is thought to have, or may have, a disability. Chapter One focuses on how a child’s need for special education is determined. In this chapter, the evaluation and decision-making processes are discussed, as well as the members of the team who conduct the tests and make the decisions regarding a child’s eligibility for special education programs and services. Chapter Two explains how a special education program (that is, an Individualized Education Program) is devel- oped and the kinds of information it must include. This chapter describes how appropriate services are deter- mined, as well as the notice that a school district must give to parents summarizing a child’s special education program. Planning for the transition from school to adult living is also discussed. Chapter Three deals with the responsibilities that a school district has to a child who is eligible for special education services and the child’s parents.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Educational Psychology 1
    Department of Educational Psychology 1 • Disability Studies Minor Department of • Special Education Minor Educational Psychology Educational Psychology Courses For information, contact the Department of Educational Psychology, EDP 101. Psychology Of The Learner. (3) (MPF) 201 McGuffey Hall, 513-529-6621. Critical investigation of issues, theories, and principles related to the nature of the learner and learning process, including such topics This department administers the undergraduate program for as psychological methodology, perception, cognitive processing, Inclusive Special Education majors that leads to a Bachelor of Science personality, and social dynamics, within the context of historical, Degree in Education, and two Ohio licenses as an Intervention social diversity, and cross-cultural perspectives. Credit not granted to Specialist in mild-moderate and moderate-intensive special needs. students who have earned credit in PSY 111. IIC. CAS-C. Both licenses allow graduates to teach in kindergarten through 12th EDP 177. Independent Studies. (0-6) grade. Teacher/Professional licensing requirements are subject to change. Please check the appropriate state's Board of Education EDP 201. Human Development and Learning in Social and website for up to date licensure requirements. Educational Contexts. (3) (MPF) In-depth examination of theoretical issues and principles of human Mild-moderate intervention specialists have expertise in designing development and learning, including developmental changes, and implementing educational programs
    [Show full text]
  • Plan: Elementary Education BSED - Special Education TSAP School: School of Education
    Plan: Elementary Education BSED - Special Education TSAP School: School of Education Description: This degree map is only valid for students transferring to IU Northwest from either Ivy Tech or Vincennes and who have earned an associate’s degree in education from either institution. The undergraduate Teaching All Learners (TAL) program prepares candidates to teach in either Elementary Education or in K-6 Special Education: Mild Interventions. This degree program requires candidates to take seven 3-credit hour courses dedicated to preparation in Special Education. Two additional elementary education courses address CEC and state special education standards in reading/language and technology. Candidates complete two 10-weeks field experiences and an 8-week clinical experience in special education (they do another 8-week clinical experience in Elementary Education). Candidates must pass through Checkpoints at critical decision points and must meet grade, GPA, portfolio, disposition, Praxis, and SPA assessment requirements before moving forward in their program. Candidates in this program are provided opportunities to learn and practice the knowledge, skills, and dispositions needed to become effective special education teachers of students who receive the general curriculum. Since Indiana is a non-categorical state, the license our candidates earn is not tied to a specific disability. Instead, candidates are prepared to work with students with all disabilities as long as they are able to receive the general curriculum. Student's Catalog
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Teaching and Learning
    Department of Teaching and Learning Course Rotation **updated August 2013 summer fall spring Educational Research and Education (EDUC) 5010 Evaluation x x x Research on Curriculum and Education (EDUC) 5020 Instruction x x Educational Philosophy and Education (EDUC) 5030 Leadership x x Education (EDUC) 5600 Principles of Instructional Design x x Education (EDUC) 5610 Instructional Methodology x x Upon Upon Upon approval of approval of approval of major major major Education (EDUC) 5850 professor professor professor Upon Upon Upon approval of approval of approval of major major major Education (EDUC) 5950 professor professor professor Education-Curriculum & Curriculum Development for Instruction (EDCI) 5020 School Improvement x x x Education-Curriculum & Instructional Improvement and Instruction (EDCI) 5030 assessment x x x Education-Curriculum & Reflective and coherent Classroom Instruction (EDCI) 5110 Practice x Education-Curriculum & Advanced Instructional Theories Instruction (EDCI) 5120 and Strategies x Education-Curriculum & Instruction (EDCI) 5130 Teaching Diverse Learners x Education-Curriculum & Clinical Internship in Curriculum & Instruction (EDCI) 5140 Instruction x Education-Curriculum & National Board Preparation: Instruction (EDCI) 5150 portfolio and assessment writing x Education-Curriculum & National Board Preparation: The Instruction (EDCI) 5160 Teacher Leader x Education-Curriculum & Professional Standards for Instruction (EDCI) 5200 instruction x Education-Special Education Educational Psychology and special (EDSP) 5000
    [Show full text]
  • Including Children with Disabilities in State Pre-K Programs
    Education Law Center Pre-K Policy Brief Series INCLUDING CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES IN STATE PRE-K PROGRMS February 2010 September 2009 States and local school districts are required by federal law to educate preschool age children with disabilities in typical early childhood programs alongside children who do not have disabilities to the maximum extent appropriate. This policy brief provides an overview of the law and sets forth a list of policy recommendations that can help ensure that children with disabilities receive an appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment. It is intended to serve as a resource for policy makers and advocates seeking to increase inclusion in state funded pre-k programs. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) The requirement to include children with disabilities in pre-k classrooms side-by- side with their typically developing peers is found in Summary of State Policy Recommendations federal laws and regulations, Create and Disseminate an Explicit Policy of as well as many state laws. Inclusivity The most important of these Provide Appropriate Teacher Training and Support Provide Support and Assistance to Schools, and the focus of this policy Families, and Communities brief is the federal Individuals Make Disability an Eligibility Factor for Targeted Programs with Disabilities Education Act Encourage Braiding and Blending of Funding (IDEA). IDEA provides federal Streams Support the Construction of Accessible Facilities funding to states to meet the and the Use of Adaptive Modifications educational needs of children Facilitate Communication and Coordination Between State and Local Agencies with disabilities. In exchange, Create Curricula and Guidelines That Promote states agree to comply with Inclusive Practices Education Law Center | Standing Up for Public School Children 1 IDEA’s substantive and procedural requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing Your Child with Disabilities for Kindergarten
    Fact Sheet: Preparing your Child with Disabilities for Kindergarten PREPARING YOUR CHILD WITH DISABILITIES FOR KINDERGARTEN Preparation is important for all children who are going to kindergarten. Preparing for your child with disabilities requires some additional thought and consideration. Preparation begins with the IEP (Individualized Education Program) Many children with disabilities will have received services from the public school system before kindergarten. The public school system may have provided services in a regular early childhood program, special education early childhood program, the child’s home, or in a private setting. If so, your child already has an IEP and has been working on goals to prepare him/her for kindergarten. As your child gets ready to enter kindergarten, you may want to request an IEP meeting to discuss your child’s needs prior to the beginning of the kindergarten school year. Other children with disabilities may not be involved with the public school system until they are ready to enter kindergarten. If this is true of your child with a disability, or you suspect your child will be identified as having a disability when s/he are in kindergarten, you should call your school and request an evaluation for your child. This will help ensure that your child will be able to receive appropriate services when kindergarten begins. How do I know if my child is ready? Children must be five years old on or before September 1 to start kindergarten in Georgia. Many children entering kindergarten are not able to read, write or do math. Kindergarten teachers will tell you that it is more important that children be able to follow directions, share and know how to take turns, pay attention and get along with others.
    [Show full text]