Final recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Electoral review November 2014 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version please contact the Local Government Boundary Commission for England: Tel: 020 7664 8534 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 100049926 2014 Contents Summary 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Analysis and final recommendations 5 Submissions received 5 Electorate figures 6 Council size 6 Warding patterns 7 Draft recommendations 7 Further draft recommendations 8 Final recommendations Doncaster town 9 Torne Valley 10 East Doncaster 10 Rural northern parishes 11 Western parishes 11 Conclusions 22 Parish electoral arrangements 22 3 What happens next? 25 Appendices A Table A1: Final recommendations for Doncaster 26 Metropolitan Borough Council B Submissions received 28 C Glossary and abbreviations 30 Summary Who we are The Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE) is an independent body set up by Parliament. We are not part of government or any political party. We are accountable to Parliament through a committee of MPs chaired by the Speaker of the House of Commons. Our main role is to carry out electoral reviews of local authorities throughout England. Electoral review An electoral review examines and proposes new electoral arrangements for a local authority. A local authority’s electoral arrangements decide: • How many councillors are needed? • How many wards or electoral divisions should there be, where are their boundaries and what should they be called? • How many councillors should represent each ward or division? Why Doncaster? We have conducted an electoral review of Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council (‘the Council’) following a request from the former Mayor, a recommendation from the Doncaster Intervention Commission and an order by the Secretary of State. Based on the February 2014 electoral figures, 10% of the wards currently have a variance from the average number of electors per councillor for the borough which is greater than 10%. Our proposals for Doncaster Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council currently has 63 councillors. Based on the evidence we received during previous phases of the review, we considered that a council size of 54 members would be appropriate in ensuring the Council could discharge its roles and responsibilities effectively. Following consultation, we considered it desirable to increase this number by one, to 55 members, to facilitate good electoral equality across the borough. Electoral arrangements Our final recommendations are that Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council’s 55 councillors should represent eight two-member wards and 13 three-member wards across the borough. One of our proposed 21 wards, (Sprotbrough) would have an electoral variance of greater than 10% from the average for Doncaster by 2019. We have finalised our recommendations for electoral arrangements for Doncaster. 1 2 1 Introduction 1 This electoral review is being conducted following our decision to review the Council’s electoral arrangements to ensure that the number of voters represented by each councillor is approximately the same across the borough. What is an electoral review? 2 Our three main considerations in conducting an electoral review are set out in legislation1 and are to: • Improve electoral equality by equalising the number of electors each councillor represents • Reflect community identity • Provide for effective and convenient local government 3 Our task is to strike the best balance between them when making our recommendations. Our powers, as well as the guidance we have provided for electoral reviews and further information on the review process, can be found on our website at www.lgbce.org.uk Consultation 4 We wrote to the Council as well as other interested parties, inviting the submission of proposals on council size. We then held four periods of consultation: first on council size, second on warding patterns for the Council; third on our draft recommendations; and finally on our further draft recommendations. The submissions received during our consultations have informed our final recommendations. This review was conducted as follows: Stage starts Description 3 September 2013 Consultation on council size 12 November 2013 Decision on council size 26 November 2013 Invitation to submit proposals for warding arrangements to LGBCE 4 February 2014 LGBCE’s analysis and formulation of draft recommendations 27 May 2014 Publication of draft recommendations and consultation on them 12 August 2014 LGBCE’s analysis and formulation of further draft recommendations 24 September 2014 Publication of further draft recommendations and consultation on them 27 October 2014 Analysis of submissions received and formulation of final recommendations 25 November 2014 Publication of final recommendations 1 Schedule 2 to the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009. 3 How will the recommendations affect you? 5 The recommendations will determine how many councillors will serve on the Council. They will also decide which ward you vote in, which other communities are in that ward and, in some instances, which parish council ward you vote in. Your ward name may also change, as may the names of parish or town council wards in the area. The names or boundaries of parishes will not change as a result of our recommendations. What is the Local Government Boundary Commission for England? 6 The Local Government Boundary Commission for England is an independent body set up by Parliament under the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009. Members of the Commission are: Max Caller CBE (Chair) Professor Colin Mellors (Deputy Chair) Dr Peter Knight CBE DL Alison Lowton Sir Tony Redmond Professor Paul Wiles CB Chief Executive: Alan Cogbill Chief Executive (Designate): Jolyon Jackson CBE 4 2 Analysis and final recommendations 7 Legislation states that our recommendations are not intended to be based solely on the existing number of electors2 in an area, but also on estimated changes in the number and distribution of electors likely to take place over a five-year period from the date of our final recommendations. We must also try to recommend strong, clearly identifiable boundaries for the wards we put forward at the end of the review. 8 In reality, the achievement of absolute electoral fairness is unlikely to be attainable and there must be a degree of flexibility. However, our approach is to keep variances in the number of electors each councillor represents to a minimum. 9 In seeking to achieve electoral fairness, we work out the average number of electors per councillor by dividing the electorate by the number of councillors as shown on the table below. 2013 2019 Electorate of Doncaster 226,535 228,840 Borough Number of councillors 55 55 Average number of 4,119 4,161 electors per councillor 10 Under our final recommendations, one of our proposed wards will have an electoral variance of greater than 10% from the average for the Borough by 2019. We are therefore satisfied that we have achieved good levels of electoral fairness for Doncaster. 11 Additionally, in circumstances where we propose to divide a parish between borough wards or county divisions, we are required to divide it into parish wards so that each parish ward is wholly contained within a single borough ward or county division. We cannot make amendments to the external boundaries of parishes as part of an electoral review. 12 These recommendations cannot affect the external boundaries of Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council or result in changes to postcodes. Nor is there any evidence that the recommendations will have an adverse effect on local taxes, house prices, or car and house insurance premiums. The proposals do not take account of parliamentary constituency boundaries, and we are not, therefore, able to take into account any representations which are based on these issues. Submissions received 13 See Appendix B for a summary list of the submissions received during the further draft consultation. All submissions from all stages of the process may be inspected at our office by appointment. All submissions received can also be viewed on our website at www.lgbce.org.uk 2 Electors refers to the number of people registered to vote, not the whole adult population. 5 Electorate figures 14 The Council submitted electorate forecasts for 2019, a period five years on from the scheduled publication of our final recommendations in 2014. These forecasts were broken down to polling district level and projected an increase in the electorate of 1% to 2019. 15 During consultation on warding arrangements, we received a submission from Armthorpe Parish Council arguing that its electorate would be greater than is forecast by 2019. It argued that the borough’s Core Strategy required significant housing growth in Armthorpe in the period to 2028. Having investigated this, we have not received evidence highlighting specific developments in the parish which are likely to be completed by 2019. Therefore, we decided not to modify the electorate forecasts for Armthorpe