Addendum No. 4 Request for Proposal No. 9117-15-0142 Closing Date: April 18, 2016 12:00 Noon (Local Time) (Revised)

Michael Pacholok Purchasing and Materials Management Division Elena Caruso, Manager Director City Hall, 17th Floor, West Tower Goods and Services 100 Queen Street West Toronto, Ontario M5H 2N2 February 19, 2016 Via Internet Posting (17 pages) ADDENDUM NO. 4 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. 9117-15-0142 CLOSING DATE: APRIL 18, 2016 12:00 NOON (LOCAL TIME) (REVISED) For: Total Design and Construction Support Services for the Construction of a New City of Toronto Marine Services Passenger and Vehicle Vessel Two-Envelope System Please refer to the above Request for Proposal (RFP) document in your possession and be advised of the following questions/modifications: CLOSING DATE EXTENSION Please be advised that the closing date has been extended to April 18, 2016 12pm (noon local time) DEADLINE FOR QUESTIONS EXTENSION Please be advised that the deadline for written question has been extended to March 11, 2016 REVISIONS R1) Remove in its entirety section 5.3 Subsection 7 – Conceptual Design and replace with the following: Subsection 7 – Conceptual Design It is important that the Vessel design meets the appropriate requirements of the City. To demonstrate the Proponent has a clear understanding of the needs, the Proponent should provide a conceptual design of a mock Vessel and should include but not limited to the following; 1. Conceptual design drawings/ 3D drawings a. Include all outboard profile drawings to illustrate the proposed mock Vessel b. Include all general arrangement drawings to illustrate the proposed mock Vessel c. Include "cut-away" elevation drawings 2. The conceptual design drawings and/or 3D drawings should include but not limited to the following requirements: a. The mock Vessel should be aesthetically pleasing, and should incorporate the nostalgic feeling of the previous Vessels while incorporating a more modern design. b. The mock Vessel should demonstrate flexibility when converting between Vehicle and Passenger use. 1 of 17 c. The mock Vessel should demonstrate the capability of efficient loading and off-loading capabilities of both passengers and vehicles. d. The mock Vessel should be intended for year round operation on Lake Ontario (fresh water) in Ontario, Canada e. The mock Vessel should include the appropriate features to operate in Toronto Habour ice conditions. As per Environment Canada, use classification first year, thin lake ice: 5- 15 centimeters thick. f. The mock Vessel should be a multipurpose double-ended passenger and vehicle vessel with a single pilot house over upper passenger deck fitted with rotating controls for dual direction operation. g. The mock Vessel should demonstrate a capacity of between 1,000 - 1,300 passengers. h. The mock Vessel should include a roll-on/roll-off vehicle deck; should include an open vehicle/ passenger deck that can be reconfigurable to 80-110 lane-meters of vehicle space. The mock design should reflect a reduced passenger capacity when carrying both vehicles and passengers. i. The mock Vessel should include collapsible barriers or an equivalent method to achieve maximum passenger capacity. j. The mock Vessel should allow for passengers loading from both sides of the ferry using existing dock infrastructure (side door(s) should be incorporated for passenger use only and for special circumstances or emergency situations). k. The mock Vessel should include a single open Roll-On/Roll-Off vehicle deck configured for easy flow through traffic with direct loading/unloading at each end of the vessel using ramps with minimum obstruction; l. The mock Vessel should have an unobstructed height of at least 5.0 metres on the (main) vehicle deck for over height vehicles. m. The mock Vessel passenger accommodations should include but not limited to: Interior seating for approximately 200-300 persons, in simple enclosed heated lounge; There should be sufficient deck space for foot passengers for a total of 800-1000 persons, in a covered sheltered area; One (1) fully accessible washroom. Suitable stowage spaces for first aid and other marine equipment should be provided. Provisions for 25 bicycles. Bike racks should be located to minimize the loss of vehicle space. j. The crew should be accommodated in a separate zone from all passenger spaces. The crew facilities should include a crew washroom. k. The mock Vessel should have appropriate dimensions to fit within the existing docking infrastructure. 2 of 17 l. The mock Vessel should include a propulsion system designed to maintain the schedule on one main engine with one stand-by unit; m. The mock Vessel should include lateral thrusting capabilities for occasional use; n. The mock Vessel should include but not limited to the following access and maintenance requirements i. In general, access routes throughout the vessel should permit free movement by Vessel's personnel and passengers and should be clear of any obstructions. Machinery and equipment should be arranged such that proper clearance is provided for operating the Vessel, inspection, and performing repairs. ii. Access should generally be provided by means of permanent ladders, doors, manholes, scuttles, and/or bolted plates. iii. The design should address storage and maintenance requirements for when the Vessel is not in use (i.e. the design should allow boats to enter local dry docks surrounding Toronto or local lift maintenance boats) and the design should allow engine, transmission replacement or accessibility, and ease of repairs; R2) Remove Section 4.2 Selection Criteria in its entirety and replace with the following: 4.2 Selection Criteria Each Proposal shall be evaluated based on the following criteria and weights: Evaluation Criteria Points Available Minimum Points Required Experience and Qualifications 40 26 Proposed Staff Team and Resources 30 19.5 Understanding of RFP, Proposed Solution 40 26 & Workplan and Deliverables Conceptual Design 30 19.5 Sub-Total 140 105 Cost 35 N/A Total 175 R3) Remove Section 4.3 Selection Process, Paragraph 4 in its entirety and replace with the following: A Proponent's technical portion of the Proposal must score a minimum of 75% (or 105 points) overall for the Cost of Services envelope to be opened and evaluated. Proposals with Technical Proposal scores below 75% will not be considered further. R4) Remove Appendix E – Proposed Evaluation Table(s) and replace with Appendix E – Proposed Evaluation Table(s) – Revised as per Addendum 4 as attached to this addendum. R5) The use of Lloyd's Register of Shipping was defined as the only Classification Society to be utilized within this Project. Anywhere within the RFP document that specifies Lloyd's Register of Shipping, the City will now allow the Vendor to use Lloyd's Register of Shipping or any other Recognized Organization (RO). A RO is a classification society that holds a valid Authorization Agreement with Transport Canada and is recognized by the Minister to perform inspection and certification services on their behalf, as defined on the Transport Canada website. 3 of 17 R6) Remove Appendix D – Supplementary Submission Forms – Price Detail Form and replace with Appendix D – Revised as per Addendum 4 – Supplementary Submission Forms – Price Detail Form as attached to this addendum. The following changes have been made: Pricing Form – Phase 3 will be priced based on the Builder location in Ontario. Should a Builder be hired outside of Ontario, the City (upon appropriate City approval) will allow a Travel and Accommodation Contingency Allowance of $100,000 to apply. There will be no mark-up on travel and accommodation costs allowed and all original receipts must be provided to the City for approval. R7) Remove 3.2 Time Constraints and Replace in its entirety the following: 3.2.1 The Project timeline has been established as follows: 3.2.1.1 June 2016 – Award Total Design and Construction Support Services RFP 3.2.1.2 July 2016 – December 2016 – Complete Design for the Vessel 3.2.1.3 January 2017 – February 2017 – Obtain Lloyd's Register of Shipping and Transport Canada Design Approval 3.2.1.4 March 2017 – July 2017 – Assemble subsequent RFP 3.2.1.5 October 2017 – December 2017 – Award Builder RFP 3.2.1.6 January 2018 – April 2019 – Completion and delivery of new Vessel 3.2.2 The new Vessel must be operational and entered into revenue service by April 2019. 3.2.3 This timeline is subject to change and appropriate written notice of any changes will be provided where feasible. R8) Remove 3.3.3.5 and 5.3 Subsection 8 G. and replace with the following; Payment will be based on the schedule below: Phase 1 – Preliminary Design - 15% of cost – paid upon completion of this part of phase – Final Design - 15% of cost – paid upon completion of this part of phase Phase 2 – Consultation services during development, selection and award of subsequent RFP for a Builder – 15% of cost – paid upon completion of this phase Phase 3 – Project Management – 50% of cost – to be paid on a monthly basis. Phase 4 – Post Construction – 5% of cost – final payment to be paid upon delivery In addition, all invoices must indicate the name of the Project Manager. The original invoices are to be sent to Accounts Payable (as indicated in Section F, Point 3), but an additional invoice (marked copy) should be sent electronically to the Project Manager. R9) Insert 3.7.1.31 into the RFP document; 3.7.1.31 The vendor must keep in mind that the Final Vessel design must fit within the existing docking infrastructure in way of the intended route - Jack Layton Ferry Terminal, Ward's Island Dock, Centre Island Dock, and Hanlan's Point Dock. The Vendor is responsible, at their own cost as part of award, for their preliminary and final design to suit the intended operation waterways including depth design suitability, including dimensional and motor design for docking suitability and crossing suitability (Crossing suitability may include vessel cruising speed, top speed, turning radius, responsiveness, balanced against time 4 of 17 and enjoyment factor for the end users to enjoy the scenic and visual City waterfront and island topography); R10) Remove in its entirety 5.2.f) must submit a 3D scale model – See Section 5.3 Subsection 7 for requirements (Mandatory).

Load more