A Comparison of Dehydration Processes of Al-, Fe -, & Mg-Sulfates Under Mars Relevant Conditions Yuhang Zhou and Alian Wang

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Comparison of Dehydration Processes of Al-, Fe -, & Mg-Sulfates Under Mars Relevant Conditions Yuhang Zhou and Alian Wang A Comparison of Dehydration Processes of Al-, Fe2+-, & Mg-Sulfates under Mars Relevant Conditions Yuhang Zhou and Alian Wang Abstract #1797 Dept. Earth and Planetary Sciences and McDonnell Center for Space Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA ([email protected])([email protected]) Introduction structural changes during the dehydration • Hydrous sulfates (Ca-, Mg-, Fe-sulfates and recently Al-sulfates) , as markers of aqueous processes on Mars, have been observed on a variety of locations on Mars; A. alunogen meta-alunogen • This set of six experiments studies the dehydration processes and dehydration rates of a Al-sulfate (Alunogen, Al2(SO4)3•17H2O) and a Fe2+-sulfate (Melanterite, FeSO •7H O); Change of Raman spectra of 4 2 H O modes SO4 modes 2 Al (SO ) .nH O (n = 17 to 12.5) • The dehydration rate of hydrous sulfates is a function of environment pressure (P), temperature (T), and partial water pressure (P ). 2 4 3 2 H2O during dehydration at 298 K. Our experiments were conducted at Mars relevant P, PH2O, and at three Ts; XRD analysis confirms the • We compared our results with those from the previous experiments on a Mg-sulfate (epsomite, MgSO •7H O); 4 2 structural change from alunogen • Our goal is to understand the potential hydration degrees of these sulfates within Mars subsurface and the current water budget of [Al (SO ) ·17H O] to meta- Mars. 2 4 3 2 alunogen Al2(SO4)3·12H2O]. Samples & Experiments Experiment Results Crystal structure study of alunogen reveals that among the total Samples are prepared to make sure: Among the 6 dehydration structural 17 H2O per molecule, 5 1. Within the same grain size range; experiments , alunogen H2O that are hydrogen bonded. 2. At the highest hydration degrees dehydrated from 17 H2O to Their weak bonding strength (RH buffer tech.) 12.53 H2O at 21°C. makes them easy to loss, while 3. With confirmed ID and Melanterite dehydrated other 12 H2O are coordinated with homogeneity (laser Raman 100- from 7 H2O to 2.72 H2O at Al, thus more structurally stable. point check). 21°C. Experimental design: 2+ Mass reductions of alunogen and melantorite during the B. Melanterite rozenite mixture of rozenite & amorphous Fe - sulfates dehydration H O modes Change of Raman spectra 1.1 1.1 2 SO4 modes alunogen dehydration at 3 temperature melanterite dehydration at 3 temperature of FeSO4.nH2O (n = 7, 4, 7 H2O 1 1) during dehydration at 17 H2O 1 0.9 6 H2O 298 K (Choi et al., 2006). 261 K 0.8 261 K 0.9 0.7 n(t)/n(0) 0.6 n(t)/n(0) 273 K 4 H2O 0.8 Crystal structure study of melanterite reveals that 0.5 273 K The P and PH2O in our experiments are relevant to general Mars P and among the total 7 structural H2O, only one is 0.4 PH2O. 298 K hydrogen bonded, which will be removed first 12 H2O time(s) 298 K 0.7 0.3 during the dehydration. Then, structural change 60 600 6000 60000 600000 60 600 6000 60000 600000 time(s) happens from ferrohexahydrite [FeSO4·6H2O, C2/c] to rozenite [FeSO4·4H2O, P21/c]. The appearance of n(t) = the number of structural H2O per molecule at a time (t) broad Raman peak at 1014 cm-1 suggests the 2+ n(0) = the number of structural H2O per molecule at a time (0) formation of amorphous Fe -sulfates with hydration Time (s) = time duration of experiment (second) degree between 1-4. Alunogen dehydrates fast until reaching 12w, then almost stable Two sets of experiments (for alunogen and melanterite) are conducted at our exp. conditions; at 3 temperatures: 25°C, 0°C, and -12°C,which are within the T range Melanterite dehydration appears as 3 stages: from 7w to 6w, to 4 Conclusion at Mars surface. w, and then further. A comparison of the dehydration processes of alunogen, melanterite, and epsomite reveals: Comparison -- three dehydration paths • The dehydration rates of all three processes are strong 1.1 1.1 temperature dependent. At low T, all three dehydrations 298 K Al2(SO4)3.nH2O 273 K 1 1.0 invariably go very slow; FeSO4.nH2O 0.9 0.9 • Under the similar P, T, P conditions, the pathways of 0.8 MgSO4.nH2O 0.8 H2O dehydration of three hydrous sulfates are very different: 0.7 0.7 alunogen lost only the hydrogen bonded H2O; melanterite went Room temperature 0°C experimental setup 0.6 0.6 through three steps in which crystalline structures were (immersed in H2O liquid + ice bath) experimental setup n(t)/n(0) 0.5 0.5 maintained during almost entire duration; epsomite lost first 0.4 0.4 n(t)/n(0) Experiments at -12°C were made by placing the vacuum desiccators in a hydrogen bonded H2O and then become amorphous during freezer (at -12°C ± 1°C). 0.3 0.3 almost entire duration. The differences in the bonding strength time(s) time(S) 0.2 0.2 are the causes for their different dehydration pathways. •For each of six experiments, 15 sample 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 bottles were used: (60±5 mg per bottle • Under the similar P, T, PH2O conditions, the dehydration of Under very similar P, T, PH2O for alunogen, 120±5 mg per bottle for 1.1 epsomite goes faster than that of melanterite, the dehydration of 261 K conditions: melanterite): melanterite goes faster than that of alunogen. 1 •at each of 9-16 steps during the • All three dehydrations are strongly T dependent; 0.9 dehydration, all 10 sample bottles were • With very different dehydration Acknowledgement taken out for mass measurements, from 0.8 pathways: This work was partially supported by NASA Mars Fundamental Research Project which we obtained the standard deviation o Alunogen – fast at beginning, then NNX10AM89G (AW) and by the Chinese Scholarship Council (YHZ). We want to thank the of gravimetric measurements; 0.7 stable at ~ 12w; help given by Ms. Y. L. Lu and Mr. Paul Carpenter in Raman, IR, and XRD laboratories. n(t)/n(0) o Melanterite – experience three 0.6 • at five steps during the dehydration, one of the remaining 5 sample stages; References o [1] Bribing et al., 2006, Science Vol 312. P400-404; [2] Murchie et al., 2009, JGR; [3] Clark et al., 2007, J. bottles was taken out for laser Raman measurements, from which we 0.5 time(s) Epsomite – a smooth continuous 0 200000 400000 600000 dehydration (amorphozation, Geophys. Res., 112, E06S01; [4] Samuel, et al., 2010,GRL, VOL. 37, L09201; [5] Wang, A., and Z. C. Ling,2011, determined the crystal structural changes. Wang et al., 2006, 2009). J. Geophys. Res., 116 , E 00 F17; [6]Wang, 2012,#2172; LPSC; [7] Chio et al., 2006, LPS XXXVII. .
Recommended publications
  • Download PDF About Minerals Sorted by Mineral Name
    MINERALS SORTED BY NAME Here is an alphabetical list of minerals discussed on this site. More information on and photographs of these minerals in Kentucky is available in the book “Rocks and Minerals of Kentucky” (Anderson, 1994). APATITE Crystal system: hexagonal. Fracture: conchoidal. Color: red, brown, white. Hardness: 5.0. Luster: opaque or semitransparent. Specific gravity: 3.1. Apatite, also called cellophane, occurs in peridotites in eastern and western Kentucky. A microcrystalline variety of collophane found in northern Woodford County is dark reddish brown, porous, and occurs in phosphatic beds, lenses, and nodules in the Tanglewood Member of the Lexington Limestone. Some fossils in the Tanglewood Member are coated with phosphate. Beds are generally very thin, but occasionally several feet thick. The Woodford County phosphate beds were mined during the early 1900s near Wallace, Ky. BARITE Crystal system: orthorhombic. Cleavage: often in groups of platy or tabular crystals. Color: usually white, but may be light shades of blue, brown, yellow, or red. Hardness: 3.0 to 3.5. Streak: white. Luster: vitreous to pearly. Specific gravity: 4.5. Tenacity: brittle. Uses: in heavy muds in oil-well drilling, to increase brilliance in the glass-making industry, as filler for paper, cosmetics, textiles, linoleum, rubber goods, paints. Barite generally occurs in a white massive variety (often appearing earthy when weathered), although some clear to bluish, bladed barite crystals have been observed in several vein deposits in central Kentucky, and commonly occurs as a solid solution series with celestite where barium and strontium can substitute for each other. Various nodular zones have been observed in Silurian–Devonian rocks in east-central Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • Azu Td Hy E9791 1968 43 Sip
    A study of crystallization from water of compounds in the system Fe² - Cu² - So₄². Item Type Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); text Authors Walton, Wayne J. A. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 24/09/2021 05:15:43 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/191508 A STUDY OF CRYSTALLIZATION FROM WATER OF COMPOUNDS IN THE SYSTEM Fe -CU++ - SO4= by Wayne J. A. Walton, Jr. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1968 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfill- ment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknow- ledginent of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerzdissertation.Pdf (5.247Mb)
    Geochemical Reactions in Unsaturated Mine Wastes Jeanette K. Jerz Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geological Sciences Committee in charge: J. Donald Rimstidt, Chair James R. Craig W. Lee Daniels Patricia Dove D. Kirk Nordstrom April 22, 2002 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Acid Mine Drainage, Pyrite, Oxidation Rate, Efflorescent Sulfate Salt, Paragenesis, Copyright 2002, Jeanette K. Jerz GEOCHEMICAL REACTIONS IN UNSATURATED MINE WASTES JEANETTE K. JERZ ABSTRACT Although mining is essential to life in our modern society, it generates huge amounts of waste that can lead to acid mine drainage (AMD). Most of these mine wastes occur as large piles that are open to the atmosphere so that air and water vapor can circulate through them. This study addresses the reactions and transformations of the minerals that occur in humid air in the pore spaces in the waste piles. The rate of pyrite oxidation in moist air was determined by measuring over time the change in pressure between a sealed chamber containing pyrite plus oxygen and a control. The experiments carried out at 25˚C, 96.8% fixed relative humidity, and oxygen partial pressures of 0.21, 0.61, and 1.00 showed that the rate of oxygen consumption is a function of oxygen partial pressure and time. The rates of oxygen consumption fit the expression dn −− O2 = 10 648...Pt 05 05. dt O2 It appears that the rate slows with time because a thin layer of ferrous sulfate + sulfuric acid solution grows on pyrite and retards oxygen transport to the pyrite surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Efflorescent Iron Sulfate Minerals: Paragenesis, Relative Stability, and Environmental Impact
    American Mineralogist, Volume 88, pages 1919–1932, 2003 Efflorescent iron sulfate minerals: Paragenesis, relative stability, and environmental impact JEANETTE K. JERZ* AND J. DONALD RIMSTIDT Department of Geological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, U.S.A. ABSTRACT This study of a pyrrhotite-dominated massive sulfide deposit in the Blue Ridge province in south- western Virginia shows that sulfate minerals formed by the oxidation of the pyrrhotite transform from one to another by a combination of oxidation, dehydration, and neutralization reactions. Significant quantities of sulfate minerals occur in the underground adits (Area I) and under overhangs along the high sidewall of the adjoining open pit (Area II). Samples from this site were analyzed to determine mineralogy, equilibrium relative humidity, chemical composition, and acid generation potential. In Area I, pyrrhotite oxidizes to marcasite + melanterite, which eventually oxidizes to melanterite + sul- furic acid. Melanterite is extruded from the rocks as a result of the volume change associated with this reaction. It accumulates in piles where halotrichite, copiapite, and fibroferrite form. In Area II, FeSO4 solutions produced by pyrrhotite oxidation migrate to the exposed pit face, where they evaporate to form melanterite. The melanterite rapidly dehydrates to form rozenite, which falls into a pile at the base of the wall, where melanterite, copiapite, and halotrichite are present. The observed paragenesis a a can be understood using a log O2 – log H2O diagram that we developed from published thermody- namic data and observations of coexisting phases. Dissolution experiments showed that fibroferrite-rich samples had the highest acid producing po- tential, followed by copiapite-rich samples and then halotrichite-rich samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Alunogen Al2(SO4)3 • 17H2O C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
    Alunogen Al2(SO4)3 • 17H2O c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Triclinic. Point Group: 1. Crystals rare, as thin plates or prismatic [001] or {010} with a six-sided outline about [010], very complex, with about 60 forms noted. Commonly fibrous, to 5 mm, forming delicate masses, crusts, and efflorescences. Twinning: On {010}. Physical Properties: Cleavage: {010}, perfect; probable on {100} and {313}. Hardness = 1.5–2 D(meas.) = 1.72–1.77 D(calc.) = 1.79 Soluble in H2O; taste alumlike, acid and sharp. Optical Properties: Transparent. Color: Colorless in crystals, aggregates white, or pale yellow or red from impurities; colorless in transmitted light. Luster: Vitreous to silky. Optical Class: Biaxial (+). Orientation: X ' b; Z ∧ c =42◦. α = 1.459–1.475 β = 1.461–1.478 γ = 1.470–1.485 2V(meas.) = 31◦ Cell Data: Space Group: P 1. a = 7.420(6) b = 26.97(2) c = 6.062(5) α =89◦57(5)0 β =97◦34(5)0 γ =91◦53(5)0 Z=2 X-ray Powder Pattern: Nov´aBaˇna, Slovakia. 4.489 (100), 4.390 (81), 3.969 (81), 4.329 (76), 13.46 (54), 3.897 (52), 3.675 (45) Chemistry: (1) (2) SO3 37.74 37.04 Al2O3 16.59 15.73 H2O 44.64 47.23 insol. 0.94 Total 99.91 100.00 • (1) Pintado Canyon, Guadalupe Co., New Mexico, USA. (2) Al2(SO4)3 17H2O. Occurrence: Forms by reaction of sulfates from decomposing sulfides with aluminous minerals in shales and slates; in gossan or altered wall rock of pyritic deposits in arid regions; in coal seams; in relatively low-temperature fumaroles.
    [Show full text]
  • Epsomite Mgso4 • 7H2O C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
    Epsomite MgSO4 • 7H2O c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Orthorhombic. Point Group: 222. Rare as crystals, prismatic along {110},to 8 cm; typically as fibrous crusts, woolly efflorescences, botryoidal to reniform masses, stalactitic. Twinning: Rare on {110}. Physical Properties: Cleavage: {010}, perfect; {101}, distinct. Fracture: Conchoidal. Hardness = 2–2.5 D(meas.) = 1.677(2) (synthetic). D(calc.) = 1.677 Dehydrates readily in dry air; soluble in H2O, with a bitter taste. Optical Properties: Transparent to translucent. Color: Colorless to white, pale pink, pale green; colorless in transmitted light. Luster: Vitreous, silky in fibrous aggregates. Optical Class: Biaxial (–). Orientation: X = a; Y = c; Z = b. Dispersion: r< v; weak. α = 1.432 β = 1.455 γ = 1.461 2V(meas.) = 52◦ Cell Data: Space Group: P 212121. a = 11.876(2) b = 12.002(2) c = 6.859(1) Z = 4 X-ray Powder Pattern: Synthetic. (ICDD 36-419). 4.216 (100), 4.200 (75), 5.98 (30), 5.34 (30), 2.658 (25), 5.31 (20), 2.880 (20) Chemistry: (1) (2) SO3 32.41 32.48 MgO 16.26 16.36 H2O 51.32 51.16 rem. 0.11 Total 100.10 100.00 • (1) Ashcroft, Canada. (2) MgSO4 7H2O. Polymorphism & Series: Forms two series, with goslarite and with morenosite. Occurrence: As efflorescences on the walls of mines, caves, and outcrops of sulfide-bearing magnesian rocks; a product of evaporation at mineral springs and saline lakes; a hydration product of kieserite and langbeinite; rarely a fumarolic sublimate. Association: Melanterite, gypsum, halotrichite, pickeringite, alunogen, rozenite (efflorescences); mirabilite (lacustrine evaporites).
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals Found in Michigan Listed by County
    Michigan Minerals Listed by Mineral Name Based on MI DEQ GSD Bulletin 6 “Mineralogy of Michigan” Actinolite, Dickinson, Gogebic, Gratiot, and Anthonyite, Houghton County Marquette counties Anthophyllite, Dickinson, and Marquette counties Aegirinaugite, Marquette County Antigorite, Dickinson, and Marquette counties Aegirine, Marquette County Apatite, Baraga, Dickinson, Houghton, Iron, Albite, Dickinson, Gratiot, Houghton, Keweenaw, Kalkaska, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Monroe and Marquette counties counties Algodonite, Baraga, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Aphrosiderite, Gogebic, Iron, and Marquette Ontonagon counties counties Allanite, Gogebic, Iron, and Marquette counties Apophyllite, Houghton, and Keweenaw counties Almandite, Dickinson, Keweenaw, and Marquette Aragonite, Gogebic, Iron, Jackson, Marquette, and counties Monroe counties Alunite, Iron County Arsenopyrite, Marquette, and Menominee counties Analcite, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Ontonagon counties Atacamite, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Ontonagon counties Anatase, Gratiot, Houghton, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Ontonagon counties Augite, Dickinson, Genesee, Gratiot, Houghton, Iron, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Ontonagon counties Andalusite, Iron, and Marquette counties Awarurite, Marquette County Andesine, Keweenaw County Axinite, Gogebic, and Marquette counties Andradite, Dickinson County Azurite, Dickinson, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Anglesite, Marquette County Ontonagon counties Anhydrite, Bay, Berrien, Gratiot, Houghton, Babingtonite, Keweenaw County Isabella, Kalamazoo, Kent, Keweenaw, Macomb, Manistee,
    [Show full text]
  • Pyrite Oxidation: a State-Of-The-Art Assessment of the Reaction Mechanism
    Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 67, No. 5, pp. 873–880, 2003 Copyright © 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd Pergamon Printed in the USA. All rights reserved 0016-7037/03 $30.00 ϩ .00 doi:10.1016/S0016-7037(02)01165-1 Pyrite oxidation: A state-of-the-art assessment of the reaction mechanism 1, 2, J. DONALD RIMSTIDT * and DAVID J. VAUGHAN 1Department of Geological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA 2Department of Earth Sciences and Williamson Research Centre for Molecular Environmental Science, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK (Received October 29, 2001; accepted in revised form August 20, 2002) Abstract—The oxidation of pyrite to release ferrous iron and sulfate ions to solution involves the transfer of seven electrons from each sulfur atom in the mineral to an aqueous oxidant. Because only one or, at most, two electrons can be transferred at a time, the overall oxidation process is quite complex. Furthermore, pyrite is a semiconductor, so the electrons are transferred from sulfur atoms at an anodic site, where oxygen atoms from water molecules attach to the sulfur atoms to form sulfoxy species, through the crystal to cathodic Fe(II) sites, where they are acquired by the oxidant species. The reaction at the cathodic sites is the rate-determining step for the overall process. This paper maps out the most important steps in this overall process. Copyright © 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd 1. INTRODUCTION particular pyrite sample or even the zone or region of a partic- ular sample. Thus, as further discussed below, subtle differ- The oxidation of pyrite, the most abundant of all metal ences in stoichiometry influence electrical properties and may sulfide minerals, is the dominant process giving rise to the in turn significantly affect reactivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Tenth Potash Ore Zone, Permian Salado Formation
    ' OPEN FILE FEZOF2 146 GEOLOGY OF THE TENTH POTASH OREZONE: PERMIAN SALAD0 FORMATION, CARLSBAD DISTRICT, NEW MEXICO ROBERT C.M. GUNN AND JOHN M. HILLS I wish to thank the personnel of Noranda Mines Limited who allowed Gunn-to study and work on their potash exploration program, especially 0. Mr. Hinds, J. ,. Dr. J. J. M. Miller, Mr. J. Condon Mr.and J. F. Brewer., Information for this report could not have been obtained without their help and the friendly relation- ships with the following potash companies and individuals: Duval Corporation Mr. W. Blake Mr. M. P. Scroggin International Minerals and Chemical Corporation Mr. R. Koenig Kerr-McGee Chemical Corporation Mr. R. Lane National Potash Company Mr. P. Brewer United States Geological Survey Mr. C. L. Jones Independent Chemist who assayed Noranda potash core in Carlsbad Mr. T. J. Futch Independent Potash Consultant in Carlsbad Mr. E. H. Miller Dr. W. N. McAnulty, Dr. W. R. Roser and co-author Hills supervised Gun& original Masters thesis at Universityof Texas at El Paso upon which this paper is based. Dr. W. M. Schwerdtner of the University of Toronto has read the manuscript critically. Noranda Exploration Company has kindly permitted the publicationof insor- mation gathered from their properties. ABSTRACT The Tenth potash ore zone is a bedded evaporite deposit in the Permian (Ochoan) SaladoFormation in the Carlsbad district, Eddy and Lex counties, New Mexico.The rocksof the Tenth ore zone were precipitated in the super- saline part of the Permian basin and range from 6 to 10 feet (1.8 to 2.1 meters) .
    [Show full text]
  • The Stability of Sulfate and Hydrated Sulfate Minerals Near Ambient Conditions and Their Significance in Environmental and Plane
    Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 62 (2013) 734–758 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Asian Earth Sciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jseaes Review The stability of sulfate and hydrated sulfate minerals near ambient conditions and their significance in environmental and planetary sciences ⇑ I-Ming Chou a, , Robert R. Seal II a, Alian Wang b a U.S. Geological Survey, 954 National Center, Reston, VA 20192, USA b Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences and McDonnell Center for Space Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA article info abstract Article history: Sulfate and hydrated sulfate minerals are abundant and ubiquitous on the surface of the Earth and also on Received 7 February 2012 other planets and their satellites. The humidity-buffer technique has been applied to study the stability of Received in revised form 5 November 2012 some of these minerals at 0.1 MPa in terms of temperature-relative humidity space on the basis of hydra- Accepted 12 November 2012 tion–dehydration reversal experiments. Updated phase relations in the binary system MgSO –H O are Available online 28 November 2012 4 2 presented, as an example, to show how reliable thermodynamic data for these minerals could be obtained based on these experimental results and thermodynamic principles. This approach has been Keywords: applied to sulfate and hydrated sulfate minerals of other metals, including Fe (both ferrous and ferric), Metal sulfate Zn, Ni, Co, Cd, and Cu. Hydrated sulfate minerals Humidity and temperature Metal–sulfate salts play important roles in the cycling of metals and sulfate in terrestrial systems, and Thermodynamics and kinetics the number of phases extends well beyond the simple sulfate salts that have thus far been investigated Terrestrial occurrence experimentally.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances and Gaps in the Knowledge of Thermodynamics and Crystallography of Acid Mine Drainage Sulfate Minerals
    MINERALOGY CHIMIA 2010, 64, No. 10 699 doi:10.2533/chimia.2010.699 Chimia 64 (2010) 699–704 © Schweizerische Chemische Gesellschaft Advances and Gaps in the Knowledge of Thermodynamics and Crystallography of Acid Mine Drainage Sulfate Minerals Juraj Majzlan* Abstract: Acidic and metal-rich waters produced by sulfide decomposition at mining sites are termed acid mine drainage (AMD). They precipitate a number of minerals, very often sulfates. The recent advances in thermodyna- mic properties and crystallography of these sulfates are reviewed here. There is a reasonable amount of data for the divalent (Mg, Ni, Co, Fe2+, Cu, Zn) sulfates and these data may be combined with and optimized by tempe- rature-relative humidity brackets available in the literature. For the sulfates with Fe3+, most data exist for jarosite; for other minerals and phases in this system, a few calorimetric studies were reported. No data whatsoever are available for the Fe2+-Fe3+ sulfates. A significant advance is the development of the Pitzer model for Fe3+-sulfate solutions and its confrontation with the available thermodynamic and solubility data. In summary, our knowledge about the thermodynamic properties of the AMD sulfates is unsatisfactory and fragmented. Keywords: Acid mine drainage Introduction population matches the quantities of the relatively recently.[12,13] A sizeable body of overall natural mass flow.[4] The mining of data accumulated during the last ten years, The ever-increasing demand for metals ores and salts does not dominate the an- partially because of interest in AMD, par- dictates the steady increase in the exploi- thropogenic mass flow but cannot be ne- tially because sulfate minerals have been tation of ore deposits, and, to a smaller glected.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF About Minerals Sorted by Mineral Group
    MINERALS SORTED BY MINERAL GROUP Most minerals are chemically classified as native elements, sulfides, sulfates, oxides, silicates, carbonates, phosphates, halides, nitrates, tungstates, molybdates, arsenates, or vanadates. More information on and photographs of these minerals in Kentucky is available in the book “Rocks and Minerals of Kentucky” (Anderson, 1994). NATIVE ELEMENTS (DIAMOND, SULFUR, GOLD) Native elements are minerals composed of only one element, such as copper, sulfur, gold, silver, and diamond. They are not common in Kentucky, but are mentioned because of their appeal to collectors. DIAMOND Crystal system: isometric. Cleavage: perfect octahedral. Color: colorless, pale shades of yellow, orange, or blue. Hardness: 10. Specific gravity: 3.5. Uses: jewelry, saws, polishing equipment. Diamond, the hardest of any naturally formed mineral, is also highly refractive, causing light to be split into a spectrum of colors commonly called play of colors. Because of its high specific gravity, it is easily concentrated in alluvial gravels, where it can be mined. This is one of the main mining methods used in South Africa, where most of the world's diamonds originate. The source rock of diamonds is the igneous rock kimberlite, also referred to as diamond pipe. A nongem variety of diamond is called bort. Kentucky has kimberlites in Elliott County in eastern Kentucky and Crittenden and Livingston Counties in western Kentucky, but no diamonds have ever been discovered in or authenticated from these rocks. A diamond was found in Adair County, but it was determined to have been brought in from somewhere else. SULFUR Crystal system: orthorhombic. Fracture: uneven. Color: yellow. Hardness 1 to 2.
    [Show full text]