CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF

Case Number: 186/14

High Court Case Number: M390/2014 (North West Division, Mafikeng)

In the matter between:

THE NGAKA MODIRI MOLEMA DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY Applicant and

THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE NORTH WEST PROVINCIAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE First Respondent

THE PRIMIER OF THE NORTH WEST PROVINCE Second Respondent

THE MEMBER OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL: DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND HUMAN SETTLEMENTS OF THE NORTH WEST PROVINCE Third Respondent

THE MINISTER OF COOPERATIVE GOVERNANCE & TRADITIONAL AFFAIRS Fourth Respondent

THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF PROVINCES Fifth Respondent

THE SPEAKER OF THE PROVINCIAL LEGISLATURE OF THE NORTH WEST PROVINCE Sixth Respondent

KHULU NAIR N.O. Seventh Respondent

THE INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL COMMISSION Eighth Respondent

ANSWERING AFFIDAVIT

I, the undersigned,

KUMARAN NAIR

do hereby state under oath as follows that:

Page 1 of 19

1. I am an adult male person and the seventh respondent in this application.

2. The Municipality is one of the four Category C municipalities in the North West

Province. It is an executive type Municipality which is constituted by an

Executive Mayor, Mayoral Committee, Speaker and Council Committees. In

terms of the provisions of section 83(3) of the Municipal Structures Act (the

Structures Act):

“A district municipality must seek to achieve the integrated, sustainable and equitable social and economic development of its area as a whole by:

a) Ensuring integrated development planning for the district as a whole; b) Promoting bulk infrastructural development and services for the district as a whole; c) Building the capacity of local municipalities in its area to perform their functions and exercise their powers where such capacity is lacking; and d) Promoting the equitable distribution of resources between the local municipalities in its area to ensure appropriate levels of municipal services within the area.”

3. Furthermore, in accordance with the provisions of section 84 of the Municipal

Structures Act, 1998 which deals with the division of functions and powers

between district and local municipalities:

3.1 the Municipality is a water services authority with the responsibility to supply bulk

water and sanitation services and amenities in its entire district;

3.2 it is also responsible for emergency services and disaster management within its

district; and

3.3 in addition, it is responsible for the construction of municipal roads and storm

Page 2 of 19

water drainage pipes or culverts.

4. In terms of Chapter 2 of the Municipal Systems Act, the Municipality is required

to exercise its executive and legislative authority within the constitutional

system of cooperative government as envisaged in section 41 of the

Constitution.

5. On 3 September 2014, I was appointed by the Member of the Executive

Council Executive responsible for Local Government and Human Settlements

as the administrator of the Ngaka Modiri Molema District Municipality (“the

Municipality”). The Municipality has been dissolved in terms of section 139(1)(c)

of the Constitution. As a result, until the next elections, I exercise all executive

obligations at the Municipality.

6. The intervention by the province was opposed by the Municipal Councillors.

This resulted in an urgent interim application being brought. The application

was refused on 25 September 2014.

7. I assumed office as administrator on 26 September 2014. Since then there has

been resistance by some employees, including the Municipal Manager and

senior managers. I was compelled to take disciplinary measures to normalise

the situation. To a large extent, as at the time of the filing of this affidavit, the

situation at the municipality has returned to normality, although there are still

areas of disruption. The Municipal Manager is on suspension on allegations of

gross insubordination and serious financial mismanagement.

Page 3 of 19

Context and response to intervention

8. The following were the identified challenges that led to the intervention:

8.1 the audit outcomes for the financial years 2010/11, 2011/12 and 2012/13 from the

Auditor General have consistently shown a chronic failure on the part of the

District Municipality to address issues raised in the management letter that

contributed to three consecutive years of Disclaimers. There are poor internal

controls which comprises supply chain processes.

8.2 The Municipality had incurred unauthorized, irregular, fruitless and wasteful

expenditure to the aggregate amount of R1, 352 billion for the 2011/2012 and

2012/2013 financial years;

8.3 water and sanitation remain the major problem in areas that fall within the

jurisdiction of the Municipality. It is quite clear that the Municipality has failed

and / or neglected to put adequate measures in place to address these

matters. The current measures that are in place are not effective. National

Government has had to intervene, for example, at Mokgola Village in

Ramotshere Moiloa;

8.4 the management of water provision programmes by the Municipality has

aggravated the water supply challenges experienced in the geographical area

of the Municipality. Furthermore, the challenges and shortcomings that were

identified in both the National Department of Water and Sanitation’

assessments – per the findings in both the Blue Drop and Green Drop reports

have still not been attended to and remain cause for serious concern; and

8.5 in contravention of the MFMA and the relevant Treasury Regulations, there

Page 4 of 19

remain huge amounts of funds that go unspent by the Municipality while

communities suffer and service delivery issues remain not attended to.

9. It is common cause that the decision of the EXCO to intervene in the affairs of

the Municipality was challenged in the North West High Court by the applicants.

The application for interim interdict was dismissed by the High Court on 25

September 2014 as I thereafter assumed official duties the following day, 26

September 2014.

10. The events that took place after the Court pronounced judgement follow below.

11. There has been disruption of some of the key services such as the supply of

water and electricity to communities. The MEC responsible for Local

Government and Human Settlements and I responded to this challenge by

establishing a Joint Operations Centre (‘JOC’) with the aim of responding to

any emergency situation that may reported.

12. We have also established an emergency reaction unit to be on standby in order

to attend to any emergency situation that may be encountered. The disruptions

of services manifested as follows:

12.1 the entrances into the Municipal offices (head office) have been barricaded by

heavy trucks, including a TLB;

12.2 keys for fire engines (trucks and other small vehicles) have been unlawfully

taken from the premises by some known individuals, ostensibly those who are

resisting the intervention. In the area under Ramotshere Moiloa local

Page 5 of 19

municipality, the instruction to take the keys of these fire fighting vehicles were

given by one of the senior managers being Mr Abe Metsoamere, who is

responsible for municipal health and emergency services. In the area of

Ditsobotla, I was informed by Mr Mtutuzeli Matwa (‘Matwa’) who is one of the

fire and emergency personnel, that the two individuals who took the keys were

Mr Koos Mokgele and Mr Isaac Motsepo;

12.3 similarly, keys to Municipality offices were removed from the premises. I was

informed that the keys were removed by, amongst others, Mr Mashi who is

the manager responsible for security services;

12.4 the sale and supply of electricity coupons to members of the community was

also disrupted as the responsible employees had been out in the streets

protesting against the intervention; and

12.5 the provision of water through trucks and the removal of sanitation waste were

discontinued by some of the service providers. Some of the reasons that were

advanced by the service providers were that they were owed by the

Municipality for services rendered while some did not want to recognise and /

or cooperate with the intervention team.

13. In my observations, during the period that I have been at the Municipality, the

interruption of services was caused primarily by workers, including senior

managers (section 56 & 57 managers) by embarking in unlawful

demonstrations and withdrawal of services (labour) in protest against the

decision by the Provincial Government’s Executive Council to invoke the

provisions of section 139(1)(c), to dissolve the municipal council. The situation

Page 6 of 19

was exacerbated by the failure of the urgent High Court bid to interdict the

intervention, where the situation became volatile. I have established that the

employees’ reaction was instigated by the former Councillors, the Municipal

Manager and certain section 56 and 57 managers who are resisting the

intervention.

14. On 26 September 2014, I attended at the Municipality’s offices in the company

of the MEC and other senior officials of the Department. On arrival at the

Municipality I was confronted by the occurrences as I have mentioned above,

inter alia:

14.1 the entrances into the Municipal offices (head office) were barricaded by

heavy trucks, including a TLB;

14.2 I had to be escorted into the Municipality premises by the SAPS using one of

their Nyala vehicles;

14.3 on our arrival, we found a group of employees singing struggle songs in the

Council chambers. The songs grew louder as we arrived and upon the group

noticing the presence of the MEC;

14.4 I noticed that tension was rising and the SAPS took us out of the premises as

they sensed that our security was under threat. The workers tried to block the

entrance that we had used to enter the premises but the police managed to

get us out;

14.5 similarly, offices at the Municipality were locked and the keys to offices were

removed from the premises.

Page 7 of 19

15. These demonstrations lasted for approximately two weeks as the employees

remained in defiance of the Administrator’s calls for them to return to work. The

employees have since returned to work and all the trucks that were used to

block entry into the premises have been removed with the help of the SAPS.

16. In the process, I received information that some employees, some of them

senior managers, are deliberately working to disrupt municipal services (fire

and emergency services) when they removed keys for the fire-fighting trucks in

an attempt to create chaos within the district. Some of these individuals are

known and cases were reported to the SAPS with the view of enlisting their

help to recover the vehicle keys and to arrest those who were responsible for

such criminal deeds.

17. Furthermore, some employees acting in concert with or under the directions of

the Municipal Manager, who is currently on suspension, decided to tamper with

the water supply to various communities within the district. Some water pipes

were closed in order to ensure that water is not pumped to reservoirs leading to

shortage of water supply to communities.

18. From the exposition presented above, it is obvious that the Municipal Manager,

s 56 and 57 managers together with other sympathetic employees colluded to

disrupt services by the Municipality in order to create an impression that the

intervention has negatively impacted on service delivery.

19. I have already pointed out the identity of some of the employees and managers

who participated in the disruption of services. I have been informed by Mr

Page 8 of 19

Matwa from the Ditsobotla fire and emergency station that the keys to the

vehicles have been returned to the station and that they are now able to

provide full emergency services.

20. I will now address the directions of the Constitution Court.

Whether there has been a cessation of basic services to communities

21. The Municipality is one of four district municipalities. District municipalities do

not deliver services directly to communities. Their contact with communities is

via local municipalities. But often because of the breakdown in services by local

municipalities and the weak infrastructure at local level, districts are compelled

to step in and render the services directly. There are five local municipalities

resorting under the jurisdiction of the Municipality, namely, Tswaing;

Ramotshere Moiloa; Mafikeng; Ratlou; and Ditsobotla.

22. The area serviced by the Municipality is, however, vast and with the exception

of the Mafikeng Local Municipality, the communities are peri-urban and rural

communities. There are approximately 115 000 households, and at the last

census count, the population was 842 000. Needless to mention, the area is

one of the poorest in South Africa.

23. The services which we provide to Municipalities and are relevant to this

application include water and sanitation, emergency services, bulk

infrastructure and reticulation and municipal health services.

24. Since we do not provide these services directly, we conclude service level

Page 9 of 19

agreements with external agents who, in turn, render the services to

municipalities. In relation to water and sanitation we are a water services

authority, in terms of the National Water Act 36 of 1998. There are two water

services suppliers which we have contracted with to supply water to

municipalities in the district, namely Botshelo Water and Sedibeng Water.

25. But some context needs to be given here. The district is one of the two water

stressed districts in the province. One of the reasons why the provincial

government dissolved the municipal council was about its failure to enter into

service level agreements with Botshelo Water and Sedibeng Water. The result

of this failure was that by July 2014 Botshelo Water and Sedibeng Water were

owed an amount in excess of R270 million by local municipalities, who were

compelled to conclude service level agreements with Botshelo Water because

of the failure by the district to conclude the service level agreements. The

district was refusing to settle the bill, while the local municipalities claimed that

the money should be paid by the district. Ultimately, this led to a breakdown in

water supply to communities. Some communities in , and

Setlagole villages have not had water for years, while the district received

equitable share allocations and grants for water and sanitation.

26. The Municipality experienced “service delivery protests” as a result of the

failure by local municipalities to deliver water. Communities of Ratlou

(Madibogo, Setlagole), Ramotshere Moilwa (Dinokana, Khunotshwana) and

Ditsobotla (, Bodibe) have protested against the lack of water provision

on their areas for several years before the intervention years.

Page 10 of 19

27. There was also a further problem related to water, namely, the quality of the

water supply and the quality of sanitation services. This led the national

government to issue a warning in relation to the drinking of the water at the

Municipality. Basically the warning was that communities should boil the water

before drinking it as the national government could not vouch for its safety.

28. When I was appointed, I realised that these service level agreements were not

in place. Since my appointment, I have concluded the service level agreements

with Botshelo Water and Sedibeng.

29. But I also experienced a different problem. The intervention was resisted by

some employees at the Municipality, as alluded to above. After the application

had been dismissed by the High Court on 25 September 2014, I was instructed

to assume my responsibilities as administrator at the municipality. In this

regard, on 26 September 2014, I attended at the premises of the municipality.

We had been tipped off that there was a possibility of resistance taking place at

the municipality. That possibility, we were made to understand, had been

orchestrated by the former councillors who had lost their application on 25

September 2014.

30. Indeed, on our arrival on 26 September 2014 at approximately 11h00, we

requested the escort of the police. We went to the municipal chamber and on

our arrival there, there were approximately 40 members of the applicant trade

union who were singing and chanting liberation songs. They noticed the fact

that I was coming together with the MEC and escalated the singing, shouting

and hurling insults at the MEC. In essence, they were trying to convey to him

Page 11 of 19

that he is not wanted at the municipality. After some attempts at intervening

through the police to negotiate with the leadership of the group which

essentially was trying to cause embarrassment to both me and the MEC, it

became clear that the situation could easily escalate into violence and we

elected to leave so that the temperatures could cool down.

31. As we were leaving the premises of the municipality, two official vehicles

attempted to block the road so that the police vehicle, the Nyala, could not exit

the premises. Although this was a highly provocative step, particularly directed

at the members of the police and clearly orchestrated by the members of the

applicant who we could spot by virtue of their SAMWU t-shirts, the police

decided not to take the bait. Instead, they arranged for me and the MEC to use

a private vehicle in order to leave the premises. We were finally given a

security escort when leaving the premises together with the MEC. It was clear

at that stage that the intervention would be resisted by some elements and that

the situation could turn volatile. We left the municipality without having had an

opportunity to greet the employees or to have me introduced to the employees

by the MEC as had been planned. The MEC's confirmatory affidavit is

available upon the court issuing a directive calling for it; it is not attached to

avoid exceeding the required number of pages, in terms of the directions under

reply.

32. Between 29 September to 3 October 2014, there was massive destruction of

infrastructure by some employees which was aimed at undermining the

intervention. We responded by setting up a Joint Operation Command Centre

(“JOC”) in order to monitor the situation from a security perspective as well

Page 12 of 19

infrastructure perspective. A full JOC report, detailing all the incidents observed

is also available, upon the court directing me to make it available; it is not

attached to avoid exceeding the required number of pages, in terms of the

directions under reply. As the report makes it clear, there are areas affected by

disruption of services which are directly connected to acts of sabotage by

people supporting the former councillors who have been removed from office.

33. There is an emergency plan in place aimed at restoring services. During the

course of last week, virtually all areas affected by the disruption in services had

been reconnected. This also explains why there has been relative calm in

community protests.

34. I have also personally visited several areas to understand community

grievances and to work out solutions with communities. The visits were

conducted as follows:

34.1 : 8, 9 and 10 October. We attended community gatherings and spoke

directly to affected communities. The communities have been very angry with

disruption of services by people who have political agendas. But most

importantly, it became clear that the problems were deep seated and required

massive infrastructural investment in the long term. For the time being, we are

providing water through tankering services.

34.2 We visited the Zeerust areas again on 16 and 17 October. The community

made it clear that they did not want anything to do with the former councillors

as there were allegations of fraud and corruption against them, which have

been publicised in the media.

Page 13 of 19

34.3 During the week of 20 October, we have visited the areas of Manche,

Schoongezicht and Dihatshwana. The purpose was to understand community

concerns and address these to the extent possible.

35. Because of the interruption in services, there have been community protests in

Zeerust, where the community blockaded the N4 on 6th and 7th October 2014.

The cause of this was that the tankering of water was stopped by the service

provider, who is being investigated for being involved in improper procurement

practices.

36. But we have intervened in this regard.

36.1 I found that there were 3 service providers on 7 October. They have been

providing tankered water in Tswaing, Ratlou and Zeerust.

36.2 In total I now have about 9 tankers which are providing water to the affected

areas, until the situation is stabilised and a long term solution is found.

36.3 In addition to the above, on 7, 8 and 9 October 2014, I entered into

discussions with Rand Water. Rand Water has agreed to supply, which they

have already done, another 20 tankers of water. I can now state that we have

more than the required supply of water to all the areas with need, as we are

addressing a more permanent solution to the delivery of these basic services.

37. I have not received any further reports of water shortages in these areas since

the additional water supplies.

38. In the same period and because the water tankering can only be a temporary

Page 14 of 19

solution, I appointed engineers to attend to the pump stations, boreholes and

diesel. Piping is being attended to through the installation of new and special

pumps. This is extensive engineering work, which will take some time to

produce results.

39. My plan is that when I leave the municipality, after the 6 months of my

appointment, the quality of the water would have improved to blue drop status

and the sewer system would return to green drop status. A detailed strategic

plan is also available, upon the court directing me to make it available; it is not

attached to avoid exceeding the required number of pages, in terms of the

directions under reply.

Cause, extent, geographic area, and duration

40. These questions have been addressed above.

Who is obliged, under the Constitution and the law to provide the services

41. In broad terms, the responsibility for the provision of the services lies on local

municipalities. But the district is accountable for the services.

42. The most senior administrative official is the municipal manager. The municipal

manager is currently on suspension for reasons of gross insubordination and

serious financial mismanagement. He has challenged his suspension in the

Labour Court and the matter is opposed by the administrator. Disciplinary steps

will be taken against him in due course. An acting municipal manager has not

yet been appointed, pending consultations with the provincial government.

Page 15 of 19

43. At the district, the responsibility for the provision of sanitation and water falls

under senior manager for infrastructure, Mr Eddie Van der Heiden. He

continues to give the administrator his full cooperation and done what he could

to ensure the services are being rendered.

44. His subordinate, Abram Senwedi, who is the manager for water services,

continues to give me problems and he is uncooperative and insubordinate.

45. However, as noted above, the municipality has concluded service level

agreements with external parties involved in tankering and Botshelo Water and

Sedibeng Water. These entities actually deliver water to communities.

46. The other employees who are important in ensuring that the services are

rendered are the following:

46.1 Mr Letlhogonolo Mokoena: the acting Chief Financial Officer. The absence of

the CFO and his staff from 06 October 2014 had resulted in the Auditor

General suspending the 2012/2014 municipal audit until mid-January 2015.

The MFMA require the Auditor General to conclude and submit the final

2013/2014 audit report by no later than 30 November 2014.

46.2 Mr Seymore Williams. He is responsible for Business process support.

46.3 Mr Lekgoa Mahole. He is the senior manager for corporate services.

46.4 Mr Abbey Metsoamere. He is responsible for public safety and community

services. Mr Metsoamere has encouraged acts of sabotage in his department

knowing full well that employees in emergency services cannot engage in any

Page 16 of 19

acts of protests.

46.5 Mr TJ Mbekweni. He is responsible for growth and development.

47. Although these employees initially stayed away from work, I must mention that

with effect from 20 October 2014, they have all returned to work. But they still

resist instructions from me. This is an area in which I shall be taking disciplinary

measures.

48. In relation to middle management I have received full cooperation and have not

had any resistance since the intervention.

49. On 20 October 2014 I met with all municipal managers at the local

municipalities falling within the district. They all bear the responsibility to ensure

that the services are delivered in their areas. The purpose of the meeting was

to discuss improvement of service delivery and audit outcomes. Included in the

discussions was a discussion on spending against the provision of services.

These discussions are ongoing and my assessment is that there is full

cooperation at this level as well.

50. The National Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs

has also seconded about 10 experts to work with the municipality during the

period of the intervention.

51. In addition to these experts, I also work with a team of 5 experts seconded by

the provincial government that are skilled in different areas in local government.

Page 17 of 19

Why this Court should not order the provision of services

52. I do not have a difficulty with any order of this Court compelling the provision of

services. In fact such an order will assist me in the discharge of my

responsibilities as the administrator given the resistance I have experienced

since taking charge of the municipality.

53. I do not intend to exclude myself in the list of people who may be ordered to

continue with the provision of services to communities. I have set out above the

names of officials and their positions, who are responsible for the various

portfolios to provide services to the communities.

54. However, when the Court considers whether to grant any order I ask that

cognisance be taken of the facts on the ground as described in the JOC report

attached hereto as well as the plan which I have instituted, which is also

attached hereto. In this regard I ask that a balance must be struck between the

supervision by this Court and the steps which are already being taken to

address the breakdown in the services.

______Deponent

THUS SIGNED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME at on this day of 2014 the deponent having acknowledged that he/she knows and understands the contents of this affidavit, that the deponent has no objection to taking the prescribed oath, that the oath which the deponent has taken in respect thereof is binding on the deponent's conscience, and that the contents of this affidavit are both true and correct.

Page 18 of 19

______COMMISSIONER OF OATHS

Page 19 of 19