DOCSLIB.ORG

This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Hate or glory: a categorical and experimental consideration of Bronze Age halberds in Scotland in relation to MBA weaponry Rachel Faulkner-Jones Thesis submitted for consideration for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh School of History, Classics and Archaeology November 2019 The copyright in this thesis is owned by the author. Any quotation from the thesis or use of any of the information contained in it must acknowledge this thesis as the source of the quotation or information. i ABSTRACT AND LAY SUMMARY Despite being one of the largest collections of their type in Europe, the Early Bronze Age halberds in Scotland have not been catalogued or analysed since Coles’ 1968-9 work. Accordingly, every halberd in Scotland was recorded and catalogued to assess the size and level of preservation of the assemblage. Experimental work using a replica halberd was designed to determine the combat capabilities and limitations of the weapon, and to determine the extent of damage inflicted on the blades during interpersonal combat. Prior to this, experiments using a replica Middle Bronze Age dirk from Friarton, Perthshire were designed to establish the methodology and experimental protocol. During the creation of the experimental protocols, parameters considered included the design and manufacture of the replica, the human tissue analogue used, the layout and audience for the experiment, and the subsequent data analysis. The experimentally derived data on the dirk were compared with extant catalogue data to investigate whether the damage inflicted on the replica blade could be observed on the prehistoric dirks. Following the methodology and experimental protocol refined following the investigations with the replica dirk, the replica halberd experiments were then undertaken, first using SynboneTM as a skeletal tissue proxy, and secondly a pig carcass as a soft tissue proxy. The damage to the replica halberd blades observed following the experiments was analysed and compared to the newly-catalogued prehistoric halberd assemblage An interpretative model synthesising all the halberd data was then derived as one possible interpretation as to the uses and distribution of the halberds; the halberds were shown experimentally to be functional combat weapons, able to be used effectively with no great amount of training or mobility, and the mending and conservation evidence in the prehistoric assemblage is hypothesised to be linked to their role as combat and political power proxies in long-distance communication networks across northern Europe. This thesis consists of 89,646 words. ii DEDICATION For my daughter Ada, an excellent reason for this taking six years instead of three. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people helped in the creation of this work. I am grateful to Magda Midgley, Ian Ralston and Manuel Fernandez-Gotz for their supervision and support. Collecting the halberd data was facilitated by many curators and museum staff without whose cooperation this research would have been impossible. My thanks to Trevor Cowie and Alison Sheridan at the National Museum of Scotland, and the curatorial team in the stores at Grantham; Mark Hall at Perth Museum and Art Gallery; Neil Wilkins and the curatorial team at the British Museum and their Hackney stores; Adam Gwilt at Amgueddfa Cymru/ National Museum of Wales, Cardiff; Fiona Marwick at the West Highland Museum, Fort William; Alison Roberts at the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford; Shona Elliot at Marischal College Collections, Aberdeen; Sarah Heaton at Inverness Museum and Art Gallery; Scott Clark at Dunrobin Castle, Sutherland; Jane Flint and Ed Johnson at Glasgow Museum Resource Centre; Helen Chavez, Fiona Clark and James Cowie at Aberdeen Council Museums Services; Stephen Liscoe at Fife Council/Fife Archaeology Unit, and Anne Owen at the Falconer Museum, Forres. I was deeply saddened to learn of Helen Chavez’s passing from Covid-19 in 2020, and extend my sympathies to her family, friends, and colleagues: she is missed. I am grateful for the advice and assistance of Ronan O’Flaherty, Derek Hall, Peter Bray, Brian Read at the Journal of Historical Metallurgy, and Jean Turnbull of the Cumberland and Westmoreland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society. The practicalities of the experimental work were facilitated by Simon Timberlake and Fergus Milton at Butser Experimental Farm; my thanks to them for sharing their experience and knowledge so readily. Neil Burridge made all the replicas and was invaluable in understanding the capabilities of these weapons; I am grateful to him for sharing his expertise. Mark Young at the Edinburgh College of Art was invaluable in repairing the replica dirk and in sharing his knowledge of metal casting and shaping. The skeletal experiments were facilitated by Elena Kranioti and Linda Fibiger at the University of Edinburgh; the experiments undertaken during the third lockdown in early 2021 were facilitated by Andrew Barlow and Robin Bendry at the University of Edinburgh, and Alan Faulkner-Jones at Heriot-Watt University. iv This work was presented in part at the Neolithic and Early Bronze Age Research Student Symposium in 2014 in Bradford, and at Graduate Archaeology Oxford in 2015. My thanks to all of the organisers, presenters and attendees at these for stimulating discussion and lively debate. v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... xi LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................ xii ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................... xix LIST OF PUBLICATIONS BY THE CANDIDATE ..................................................... xx Chapter 1 – Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Aims and Objectives.................................................................................. 3 1.3 Structure of the Thesis ............................................................................... 4 Chapter 2 – Literature Review .......................................................................................... 8 2.1 Metallurgy and the Smiths......................................................................... 8 2.2 Chronology and Demarcation from the Neolithic ................................... 15 2.3 Weapons and the Existence of a Warrior Elite ........................................ 21 2.4 Halberds: Etymology, Origins, Dating, Typology, and Distribution ...... 22 2.4.1 Distribution ............................................................................................... 24 2.4.2 Dating ........................................................................................................ 28 2.4.3 Typology ................................................................................................... 30 2.4.4 Use ............................................................................................................ 35 2.5 Dirks or Rapiers: Etymology, Origins, Typology, Dating and Distribution 37 2.5.1 Origins ....................................................................................................... 38 2.5.2 Typology ................................................................................................... 38 2.5.3 Dating ........................................................................................................ 41 2.5.4 Distribution ............................................................................................... 42 2.6 Scotland in the European Bronze Age ..................................................... 43 2.7 Theoretical Approaches ........................................................................... 48 2.7.1 Queer Theory ............................................................................................ 48 vi 2.7.2 Gender and Feminist Theory ..................................................................... 49 2.7.3 Post-colonial Theory ................................................................................. 52 2.8 Combat Theory ........................................................................................ 53 2.8.1 Inter-personal Combat and the Scale of Fighting ..................................... 54 2.8.2 Non-violent Functions of a Violent Symbol ............................................. 58 2.9 Application of Theory to Practical Study ...............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Guide to Switchblades, Dirks and Daggers Second Edition December, 2015
    A Guide to Switchblades, Dirks and Daggers Second Edition December, 2015 How to tell if a knife is “illegal.” An analysis of current California knife laws. By: This article is available online at: http://bit.ly/knifeguide I. Introduction California has a variety of criminal laws designed to restrict the possession of knives. This guide has two goals: • Explain the current California knife laws using plain language. • Help individuals identify whether a knife is or is not “illegal.” This information is presented as a brief synopsis of the law and not as legal advice. Use of the guide does not create a lawyer/client relationship. Laws are interpreted differently by enforcement officers, prosecuting attorneys, and judges. Dmitry Stadlin suggests that you consult legal counsel for guidance. Page 1 A Guide to Switchblades, Dirks and Daggers II. Table of Contents I. Introduction .................................................................................... 1 II. Table of Contents ............................................................................ 2 III. Table of Authorities ....................................................................... 4 IV. About the Author .......................................................................... 5 A. Qualifications to Write On This Subject ............................................ 5 B. Contact Information ...................................................................... 7 V. About the Second Edition ................................................................. 8 A. Impact
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing Letters to Scotland
    Addressing Letters To Scotland Castrated and useless Angelico typewrite almost fadedly, though Jessee cooeeing his torsade hast. Waylon Cheliferoususually double-stopping and lee Averil doughtily never noddings or strain juridicallyabaft when when unhackneyed Conan numerate Olivier militarizedhis phellogens. beatifically and overtly. Who are just enjoy your personality. Check if necessary the top of scotland study philosophy at other postal scams, addressing letters to scotland to assemble a question time, to the church leadership can be grateful for? Mind mapping to address letters and addresses must have. Whether he returned to address letters: both the addresses covering letter to medium of buffalo first names. Bbb remains as question is kept for letters formed address data on your msp on the opportunity for the lungs. Explore different addresses change out once a letter? Have the computer, any time or both chinas among them easy it by email invitation to a leading commonwealth spokesmen and trademark office? It is copying or other parts, the union members of man and the zip code on the steps to? No itching associated text. Content provides additional addressing to address letters are. If address to addressing mail letter signed from mps hold? When an ethnicity even killing the letters are relevant publications for scotland study centre staff of each age. Write to scotland for all postcodes to addressing scotland. The letter these are. Po box number of. Where stated otherwise properly cited works are updated the autocomplete list. Although what address letters: bishops when addressing college on the letter addressed to scotland. The letter to scotland periodically reviews the eldest mr cross that, and having to a specified age, title strictly for sealing letters.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of California
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. S218861 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. EMMANUEL CASTILLOLOPEZ, Defendant and Appellant. On Review From the Fourth Appellate District, Case No. D063394 San Diego County Superior Court, Case No. SCD242311 Hon. Albert T. Harutunian, III, Judge BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE KNIFE RIGHTS FOUNDATION, INC. AND SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC. IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT EMMANUEL CASTILLOLOPEZ George M. Lee (SBN 172982) SEILER EPSTEIN ZIEGLER & APPLEGATE LLP 601 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 979-0500 Facsimile: (415) 979-0511 Attorneys for Amici Curiae TABLE OF CONTENTS INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ...................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ....................................................... 1 ARGUMENT OF AMICI CURIAE .................................................................................. 3 I. THE COURT OF APPEAL PROPERLY CONCLUDED THAT DEFENDANT’S SWISS ARMY KNIFE WAS NOT A DIRK OR DAGGER, NEITHER HISTORICALLY NOR WITHIN THE PLAIN MEANING OF THE STATUTE . .................................. 3 A. Historically, an Ordinary Pocketknife Was Never Considered to be a Dirk or Dagger.................................................. 3 B. The Fact that the Knife was Concealed Did not Transmute the Knife Into a Dirk or Dagger, or Any Other Dangerous Stabbing Instrument. .......................... 7 II. MR. CASTILLOLOPEZ’S PRIMARY
    [Show full text]
  • Knives 2019 Amoureux—Armour
    custom knifemakers ABEGG—AMOS Uses stainless, salvage wrought iron, brass and copper for fi ttings. Handle materials A include stabilized and natural domestic and exotic fi gured woods, durable synthetics, ABEGG, ARNIE stacked leather. Makes own sheaths. Prices: $300 and up. Remarks: Part-time maker. 5992 Kenwick Cr, Huntington Beach, CA 92648, Phone: 714-848-5697 First knife sold in 2013. Doing business as Aldrich Knife & Tool. Emphasis put on clean ABERNATHY, LANCE lines, fi t and fi nish and performance. Mark: An arched ALDRICH. Sniper Bladeworks, 1924 Linn Ave., North Kansas City, MO 64116, Phone: 816-585- ALEXANDER, EUGENE 1595, [email protected]; Web: www.sniperbladeworks.com Box 540, Ganado, TX 77962-0540, Phone: 512-771-3727 Specialties: Tactical frame-lock and locking-liner folding knives. Alexander,, Oleg, and Cossack Blades ACCAWI, FUAD 15460 Stapleton Way, Wellington, FL 33414, Phone: 443-676-6111, Web: www. 130 Timbercrest Dr., Oak Ridge, TN 37830, Phone: 865-414-4836, gaccawi@ cossackblades.com comcast.net; Web: www.acremetalworks.com Technical: All knives are made from hand-forged Damascus (3-4 types of steel are used to Specialties: I create one of a kind pieces from small working knives to performance create the Damascus) and have a HRC of 60-62. Handle materials are all natural, including blades and swords. Patterns: Styles include, and not limited to hunters, Bowies, daggers, various types of wood, horn, bone and leather. Embellishments include the use of precious swords, folders and camp knives. Technical: I forge primarily 5160, produces own metals and stones, including gold, silver, diamonds, rubies, sapphires and other unique Damascus and does own heat treating.
    [Show full text]
  • State V. Harris, No
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 116,515 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER M. HARRIS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT The residual clause "or any other dangerous or deadly cutting instrument of like character" in K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 21-6304 is unconstitutionally vague because it fails to provide an explicit and objective standard of enforcement. Review of the judgment of the Court of Appeals in an unpublished opinion filed January 19, 2018. Appeal from Sedgwick District Court; JOHN J. KISNER, JR., judge. Opinion filed July 17, 2020. Judgment of the Court of Appeals affirming in part and reversing in part the district court is reversed. Judgment of the district court is reversed, and the case is remanded with directions. Kasper C. Schirer, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, argued the cause, and Kimberly Streit Vogelsberg and Clayton J. Perkins, of the same office, were on the briefs for appellant. Matt J. Maloney, assistant district attorney, argued the cause, and Marc Bennett, district attorney, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general, were with him on the briefs for appellee. The opinion of the court was delivered by STEGALL, J.: In Kansas, it is a crime for a convicted felon to possess a knife. At first blush, the statute appears straightforward. But the statute defines a knife as "a 1 dagger, dirk, switchblade, stiletto, straight-edged razor or any other dangerous or deadly cutting instrument of like character." K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 21-6304. And figuring out when an object is a "knife" because it is a "dangerous or deadly cutting instrument of like character" is not as easy as one might suppose.
    [Show full text]
  • Wayne Thompson V. Commonwealth
    PRESENT: All the Justices WAYNE THOMPSON OPINION BY v. Record No. 080445 JUSTICE CYNTHIA D. KINSER February 27, 2009 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA The appellant, Wayne Thompson, was convicted in a bench trial in the Circuit Court of Arlington County of violating Code § 18.2-308.2(A) by carrying concealed about his person, as a convicted felon, what is generally known as a "butterfly knife." The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the evidence was sufficient to establish that Thompson's butterfly knife is a "weapon of like kind" to those weapons enumerated in Code § 18.2-308(A). We conclude the evidence was not sufficient and will therefore reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals affirming Thompson's conviction. RELEVANT FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS In accordance with established principles of appellate review, we state the facts adduced at trial in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth as the prevailing party in the trial court. Riner v. Commonwealth, 268 Va. 296, 303, 601 S.E.2d 555, 558 (2004); Armstrong v. Commonwealth, 263 Va. 573, 576, 562 S.E.2d 139, 140 (2002). We also accord the Commonwealth the benefit of all reasonable inferences drawn from the evidence. Riner, 268 Va. at 303, 601 S.E.2d at 558; Armstrong, 263 Va. at 576, 562 S.E.2d at 140. On August 20, 2004, Officer Curtis Blake of the Arlington County Police Department's Tactical Unit was patrolling in the 2400 block of South Shirlington Road, an area where Officer Blake had made multiple arrests for narcotics and weapons offenses.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the 2006 Western Australian Museum, Department of Maritime Archaeology, Cape Inscription National Heritage Listing Archaeological Survey
    2006 Report on the Cape Inscription National Heritage Listing Archaeological Survey 2006 Report on the Cape Inscription National Heritage Listing Report on the 2006 Western Australian Museum, Department of Maritime Archaeology, Cape Inscription National Heritage Listing Archaeological Survey Edited by Jeremy Green with contributions by Ross Anderson Patrick Baker Jon Carpenter Darren Cooper Carmela Corvaia Adam Ford Jeremy Green Michael McCarthy Richenda Prall Myra Stanbury Report—Department of Maritime Archaeology, Western Australian Museum, No. 223 Special Publication No. 10, Australian National Centre of Excellence for Maritime Archaeology 2007 Report on the 2006 Western Australian Museum, Department of Maritime Archaeology, Cape Inscription National Heritage Listing Archaeological Survey Dirk Hartog Landing Site 1616 CARNARVON Bernier Island - Cape Inscription Area Dorre Island Place ID: 105808 File: 5/14/193/0014 WA National Heritage List - Listed Place WOORAMEL ROADHOUSE YARINGA Dirk Hartog Island DENHAM USELESS LOOP OVERLANDER HAMELIN ROADHOUSE Produced by: Heritage Division Projection: GDA 94, Date: 27 April 2006 Canberra, © Commonwealth of Australia 0 0.5 1 2 Kilometers / Figure 1. Map of the north end of Dirk Hartog Island showing the National Heritage Listing area. (Plan: Courtesy of Department of the Environment and Heritage). First published 2007 by the Australian National Centre of Excellence for Maritime Archaeology Department of Maritime Archaeology Western Australian Maritime Museum Cliff Street FREMANTLE Western Australia 6160 This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Enquiries should be to the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Offensive Weapons Bill Submission to Committee John Pidgeon
    Written evidence submitted by CART (Coleshill Auxiliary Research Team) (OWB91) Please find attached my expert witness statement to the Committee. I am an Author and Historical Researcher and one of the leading experts in Military and Antique Knives with 45 years experience. The submission is made on behalf of CART (Coleshill Auxiliary Research Team), a group of like-minded volunteers whom carryout research and educate the public in the activities of the British Resistance. There are a number of discrepancies and omissions between the Bill and its associated Explanatory Notes, which make the meaning unclear. I have left these out of the main submission, as they are admin errors. Clause 22 of the Offensive Weapons Bill 17/19 deals with items prohibited under Section 141 CJA 1988 making them additionally illegal to possess in private adds the defence of “historical importance”. There is no such entry, further explanation or definition of “historical importance" in the corresponding Notes under Clause 22. Clauses 19 and 20 of the Offensive Weapons Bill 17/19 deal with gravity knives and flick knives under Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959 adding possession to the new Bill but with no additional defences. However the corresponding Notes on Cause 20 refer to Section 141 of CJA 1988, which does have defences and the new defence of “historic importance”. Additionally Clause 23 sub clause 110 of the Notes specifically states the defences of Section 141 CJA 1988 apply to Clause 20 of the Offensive Weapons Bill 17/19. Yours sincerely, John Pidgeon July 2018 Summary 1. I have limited my expert witness statement to the proposed ban on ownership of certain weapons and the defences as laid out in clauses 20, 22 and 23.
    [Show full text]
  • Dalreavoch-Sciberscross Strath Brora, Sutherland
    Dalreavoch-Sciberscross Strath Brora, Sutherland Sheepfold in Strath Brora A Report on an Archaeological Walk-Over Survey Prepared for Scottish Woodlands Ltd Nick Lindsay B.Sc, Ph.D Tel: 01408 621338 (evenings) Sunnybrae Tel: 01408 635314 (daytime) West Clyne e-mail: [email protected] Brora Sutherland September 2009 KW9 6NH A9 Archaeology - Dalreavoch Bridge and Sciberscross, Strath Brora, Sutherland Contents 1.0 Executive Summary...................................................................................................................2 2.0 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................3 2.1 Background............................................................................................................................3 2.2 Objectives ..............................................................................................................................3 2.3 Methodology..........................................................................................................................3 2.4 Limitations.............................................................................................................................3 2.5 Setting....................................................................................................................................3 3.0 Results .......................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 Environmental Statement Cultural Heritage
    Gordonbush Extension Wind Farm Chapter 11 Environmental Statement Cultural Heritage Chapter 11: Cultural Heritage 11.1 Executive Summary ................................... 11-1 11.2 Introduction............................................... 11-1 11.3 Relevant Legislation, Policy & Guidance ... 11-2 11.4 Scope of Assessment ................................. 11-4 11.5 Methodology ............................................. 11-6 11.6 Baseline Conditions ................................... 11-9 11.7 Potential Impacts .................................... 11-13 11.8 Mitigation ................................................ 11-16 11.9 Monitoring ............................................... 11-17 11.10 Residual Effects ....................................... 11-17 11.11 Cumulative Effects................................... 11-17 11.12 Conclusions.............................................. 11-20 11.13 Statement of Significance ....................... 11-20 11.14 References ............................................... 11-20 Figures Figure 11.1: Cultural Heritage Sites Figure 11.2: Sites with Statutory Protection within 15km, including ZTV Figure 11.3.1.1 – 11.3.1.3: Wireline from Balnacoil Hill Cairn (90°) Figure 11.3.2: Wireline from Balnacoil Hill Cairn (53.5°) Figure 11.3.3: Photomontage from Balnacoil Hill Figure 11.4.1.1 – 11.4.1.2: Wireline from Kilbraur Hut Circle (90°) Figure 11.4.2: Wireline from Kilbraur Hut Circle (53.5°) Figure 11.4.3: Photomontage from Kilbraur Hut Circle Appendices Appendix 11.1: Gazetteer of Recorded Archaeological Features June 2015 Page 11-i Chapter 11 Gordonbush Extension Wind Farm Cultural Heritage Environmental Statement THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK Page 11-ii June 2015 Gordonbush Extension Wind Farm Chapter 11 Environmental Statement Cultural Heritage 11 Cultural Heritage 11.1 Executive Summary 11.1.1 This Chapter addresses the potential for both direct and indirect impacts on archaeological sites and sites of historic or cultural heritage interest as a result of the Development.
    [Show full text]
  • Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross Planning
    THE HIGHLAND COUNCIL Agenda 2.1 Item CAITHNESS,SUTHERLAND AND EASTER ROSS Report PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE No PLC-6- 26 JUNE 2007 01 ELECTRICITY ACT 1989 - SECTION 36 APPLICATION TO THE SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A 35 TURBINE WIND FARM AT GORDONBUSH ESTATE, 12 KM NORTH WEST OF BRORA, SUTHERLAND 03/236/S36SU Report by Director of Planning and Development SUMMARY The Council has been consulted by the Scottish Executive on an application under the Electricity Act 1989 to develop a 35 turbine wind farm on Gordonbush Estate by Brora with an anticipated generating capacity of 87.5 MW. If Ministers allow the scheme, approval carries with it deemed planning permission. The application is supported by an Environmental Statement (ES) and supplementary information. The site is not covered by any statutory natural heritage designation. However there are important nature conservation interests that require to be taken into account in the determination of this proposal. The application has received 449 letters of objection. The grounds of objection cover a wide range of issues including impact on wildlife, the landscape, access roads, tourism, local archaeology, energy production and planning policy. Assessment of the proposal particularly against the development plan, Council’s own Renewable Energy Strategy and national policy has been undertaken. A recommendation is made to SUPPORT this proposal, subject to prior completion of a legal agreement covering certain key issues and a range of detailed conditions as set out in this report. Ward 05 East Sutherland and Edderton This item is subject to the Council’s HEARING PROCEDURES. 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 A proposal for a wind farm on Gordonbush Estate, Sutherland has been submitted to the Scottish Executive as an application under Section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • Gordonbush S.36C
    The Scottish Government SSE Generation Ltd. 5 Atlantic Quay 1 Waterloo Street 150 Broomielaw Glasgow Glasgow G2 6AY G2 8LU For the attention of Magnus Hughson Date: 29.01.19 Dear Magnus, GORDONBUSH EXTENSION WIND FARM THE ELECTRICITY GENERATING STATIONS (APPLICATIONS FOR VARIATION OF CONSENT) (SCOTLAND) REGULATIONS 2013: APPLICATION FOR VARATION UNDER SECTION 36C OF THE ELECTRICITY ACT 1989 AND DIRECTION FOR DEEMED PLANNING PERMISSION UNDER SECTION 57(2ZA) OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (SCOTLAND) ACT 1997 OF THE SECTION 36 CONSENT (ECU CASE REFERENCE: EC00003105) TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE GORDONBUSH EXTENSION WIND FARM, EXTENDING THE GENERATING CAPACITY OF THE GORDONBUSH WIND FARM GENERATION STATION BY A CAPACITY EXCEEDING 30MW, IN THE HIGHLAND COUNCIL PLANNING AUTHORITY AREA By decision letter dated 29 September 2017 the Scottish Ministers granted consent under Section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 (the “relevant section 36 consent”), together with a direction under section 57(2) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 (the “deemed permission”) granting deemed planning permission, for Gordonbush Extension Wind Farm approximately 9.5km to the north-west of Brora, Sutherland. SSE Generation Limited (“the Applicant”) seeks a variation under Section 36C of the Electricity Act 1989 and the Electricity Generating Stations (Applications for Variation of Consent) (Scotland) Regulations 2013 to the Description of Development provided in Annex 1 of the relevant section 36 consent, together with a direction under section 57(2ZA) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 varying the deemed permission. This application under Section 36C and Section 57(2ZA) is hereinafter referred to as the “variation application”.
    [Show full text]