DOCSLIB.ORG

Vermont Water Quality Standards Environmental Protection Rule Chapter 29(A)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vermont Water Quality Standards Environmental Protection Rule Chapter 29(A) State of Vermont AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Watershed Management Division One National Life Drive, Main 2 Montpelier, VT 05620 (802) 828-1535 http://www.anr.state.vt.us/dec/rulessum.htm Vermont Water Quality Standards Environmental Protection Rule Chapter 29(a) Effective October 30, 2014 Contents Chapter 1 GENERAL POLICY ...................................................................................................... 5 Section 1-01 Applicability and Definitions .................................................................................. 5 A. Applicability ....................................................................................................................... 5 B. Definitions .......................................................................................................................... 5 Section 1-02 General Policy ......................................................................................................... 9 A. Water Quality Policy (See 10 V.S.A. §1250) ..................................................................... 9 B. Water Conservation Policy ............................................................................................... 10 C. Riparian Policy ................................................................................................................. 10 D. Basin Planning .................................................................................................................. 10 E. Hydrology Policy .............................................................................................................. 11 F. Classification of Waters .................................................................................................... 11 Section 1-03 Anti-Degradation Policy ........................................................................................ 11 A. General Policy .................................................................................................................. 11 B. Determination of Existing Uses ........................................................................................ 12 C. Protection and Maintenance of High Quality Waters ....................................................... 12 D. Protection of Outstanding Resource Waters ..................................................................... 13 Section 1-04 Discharge Policy .................................................................................................... 13 A. Discharge Criteria ............................................................................................................. 13 B. Assimilative Capacity ....................................................................................................... 14 C. Compliance Schedules ..................................................................................................... 14 Section 1-05 Interpretation ......................................................................................................... 14 Chapter 2 APPLICATION OF STANDARDS ............................................................................. 14 Section 2-01 Sampling and Analysis .......................................................................................... 14 Section 2-02 Flow Values Used to Evaluate Compliance with Applicable Numeric Criteria for Rivers, Streams, Brooks, Creeks, and Riverine Impoundments ..................................................... 15 A. Natural Flow Regime........................................................................................................ 15 B. Natural Flow Regime Altered by Human-made Structures .............................................. 15 Section 2-03 Nonpoint Source Pollution .................................................................................... 16 A. Policy ................................................................................................................................ 16 B. Use of Management Practices and Planning .................................................................... 16 Section 2-04 Special Zones ......................................................................................................... 16 Vermont Water Quality Standards, Environmental Protection Rule Chapter 29(a) 2 A. Mixing Zones .................................................................................................................... 16 B. Waste Management Zones ................................................................................................ 17 Section 2-05 Public Water Supply .............................................................................................. 18 A. Designation ....................................................................................................................... 18 B. Public Water Supply Management ................................................................................... 18 Chapter 3 DETERMINATION OF CRITERIA ............................................................................ 18 Section 3-01 Water Quality Criteria and Indices - General ........................................................ 18 A. Natural Influences ............................................................................................................. 18 B. General Criteria ................................................................................................................ 18 C. Hydrology Criteria ............................................................................................................ 23 D. Numeric Biological Indices .............................................................................................. 25 Section 3-02 Class A(1) Ecological Waters................................................................................ 26 A. Management Objectives ................................................................................................... 26 B. Water Quality Criteria for Class A(1) Ecological Waters ................................................ 26 Section 3-03 Class A(2) Public Water Supplies ......................................................................... 29 A. Management Objectives ................................................................................................... 29 B. Water Quality Criteria for Class A(2) Public Water Supplies .......................................... 29 Section 3-04 Class B Waters....................................................................................................... 32 A. Management Objectives ................................................................................................... 32 B. Water Quality Criteria for Class B waters ........................................................................ 32 Section 3-05 Fish Habitat Designation ....................................................................................... 37 Section 3-06 Water Management Types ..................................................................................... 37 A. Purpose ............................................................................................................................. 37 B. Water Management Type Designation Process ................................................................ 37 Chapter 4 WATER QUALITY CLASSIFICATIONS .................................................................. 39 Section 4-01. Classification of the Batten Kill Walloomsac and Hoosic Basin (Basin 1) .......... 39 Section 4-02. Classification of the Poultney-Mettawee Basin (Basin 2) ..................................... 41 Section 4-03. Classification of the Otter Creek Basin (Basin 3) ................................................. 41 Section 4.04. Classification of the Southern Champlain Basin (Basin #4) ................................. 43 Section 4-05. Classification of the Northern Champlain Basin (Basin #5) ................................. 44 Section 4.06. Classification of the Missisquoi Basin (Basin 6)................................................... 45 Section 4-07. Classification of Lamoille Basin (Basin 7)............................................................ 46 Section 4-08. Classification of the Winooski Basin (Basin 8)..................................................... 47 Vermont Water Quality Standards, Environmental Protection Rule Chapter 29(a) 3 Section 4-09. Classification of the White River Basin (Basin 9)2Section 4-09. Classification of the White Basin (Basin 9) ............................................................................................................... 49 Section 4-10. Classification of the Ottauquechee-Black Basin (Basin 10) ................................. 49 Section 4-11. Classification of the West-Williams-Saxtons Basin (Basin 11) ............................ 50 Section 4-12 Classification of the Deerfield Basin (Basin 12) ................................................... 52 Section 4-13. Classification of the Lower Connecticut Basin (Basin 13) ................................... 52 Section 4-14. Classification of the Stevens-Wells-Waits-Ompompanoosuc Basin (Basin 14) ... 54 Section 4-15. Classification of the Passumpsic Basin (Basin 15) ............................................... 54 Section 4-16. Classification of the Northern Connecticut Basin (Basin 16) ............................... 56 Section 4-17. Classification of the Memphremagog Basin (Basin 17) ........................................ 57
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DEERFIELD RIVER WATERSHED Assessment Report
    DEERFIELD RIVER WATERSHED Assessment Report 2004-2008 Downstream of Fife Brook Dam The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs 251 Causeway Street, Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114-2119 Mitt Romney GOVERNOR Kerry Healey LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR Tel: (617) 626-1000 Fax: (617) 626-1181 Ellen Roy Herzfelder or (617) 626-1180 SECRETARY http://www.state.ma.us/envir November 19, 2004 Dear Friends of the Deerfield River Watershed: It is with great pleasure that I present you with the Assessment Report for the Deerfield River Watershed. The report helped formulate the 5-year watershed action plan that will guide local and state environmental efforts within the Deerfield River Watershed over the next five years. The report expresses some of the overall goals of the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, such as improving water quality, restoring natural flows to rivers, protecting and restoring biodiversity and habitats, improving public access and balanced resource use, improving local capacity, and promoting a shared responsibility for watershed protection and management. The Deerfield River Watershed Assessment Report was developed with input from the Deerfield River Watershed Team and multiple stakeholders including watershed groups, state and federal agencies, Regional Planning Agencies and, of course, the general public from across the Watershed. We appreciate the opportunity to engage such a wide group of expertise and experience as it allows the state to focus on the issues and challenges that might otherwise not be easily characterized. From your input we have identified the following priority issues: • Water Quantity • Water Quality • Fish Communities • Wildlife and Terrestrial Habitat • Open Space • Recreation I commend everyone involved in this endeavor.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Americans Ol'
    Native Americans ol' Clarendon, Vermont *This is only a report of my early findings. This is subject to charge as new evidence and facts arise. I\rly research has led me to cliscover two groups of Native Americiurs that could have resided in Clarendon and one other that may have simply passed through time to time. The tribe of Native l[mericans that has the highest likelihood of being in Clarendon isi the Mahican, specifically the subdivision Mahican proper. Their territory extended from Poughkeepsie, New York to Deerfield, I\4assachusetts, and extended flrttrest north in Rutland. It is important to mention that tlhey are not to be mistaken with the Mohegan tribes of Connecticut; however, they do have lineage witkr one another. As a side note, the Mahicans have lineage with the Lenape and ['equot. Other names for the Mahicans is as follows: Akochakanen (koquois name that means "Those who,speak a strangertongue"), Canoe Indians (Given by colonists), Hikanagi/Nhilcana (Given by the Shawnee), Laups (Given by the French), Orunges (,Given by a school textbook author, Chauvignerie, who rvas referring to a specific Mahican tribe in 1736), River Indians (Given by the Dutch), and Uragees (Again given by an author, Colden, in reference to a specific tribe of the.Mahicans 1747). Mahicans were hunters of southwestem and western Vermont. lheir langrllge belonged to the linguistic family of the Algonquian, spoken with an r-dialect. Sieldom did they settle anywhere in Vermont to stay due to the fact that they were typically hLunters, hotvever, it is not irnprobable that they had permanent selllements in Clarendon.r Historic territory of the |tdahicans l Swanton, John R., The lndion Tribes of North America,1953 pg.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Hartford Agricultural Oral History Project Interview Transcription June 29, 2012 White River Junction, VT Interviewer: Ka
    HOHP_Schaal_Transcript Hartford Agricultural Oral History Project Interview Transcription June 29, 2012 White River Junction, VT Interviewer: Kaitlin O’Shea Interviewees: Pete Schaal Location: White River Junction, VT Time: 8:30am KO: Kaitlin O’Shea PS: Peter Schaal The Hartford Agricultural Oral History Project, the 2012 segment, is funded by the US Department of the Interior, National Park Service, for the Certified Local Government Program of Vermont’s annual program under the provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act. Previously, Hartford’s agricultural oral history has been documented primarily through volunteers, often with interview recordings and transcriptions occurring at separate phases with different people. In 2009, additional historical research was provided through the 2009 Vermont Barn Census. The purpose of this agricultural oral history project is to document the history of local residents who grew up or worked on a farm in the Town of Hartford. The Town is comprised of five villages: White River Junction, Hartford, Wilder, Quechee and West Hartford, in addition to several smaller hamlets. TIME & TRANSCRIPTION TOPICS 00:00:01 00:00:01 Introductions KO: Today is Friday June 29, 2012. I am Kaitlin O’Shea and I am interviewing Pete Schaal for the Hartford Agricultural Oral History Project. Good morning and thank you for having me. PS: Good morning Kaitlin. It’s a pleasure to have you down. Farming, KO: So you said that you were farming in the ‘50s. Can you tell me 1950s. Family where you grew up and a little bit about your family? farm in MA; Guernsey PS: Sure. We started farming at a small scale in a little town called cattle; [Stow in Massachusetts].
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Hartford Draft Town Plan
    TOWN OF HARTFORD DRAFT TOWN PLAN March 11, 2019* Prepared by the Hartford Planning Commission with the assistance from the Hartford Department of Planning and Development Services and the Town Plan Steering Committee * This Plan has been updated since the 2/22/19 Draft. The additions are highlighted in red and underlined, and deletions are highlighted in red with the slash-out feature. In some instances, these reflect relocation and not substantial changes. INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION TO TOWN PLANNING According to the book, “Essentials of Land Use Planning and Regulation” by the Vermont Land Use Education and Training Collaborative, “the municipal plan is the visionary document that assesses the current status of a community and lays out a vision for the future.” Used interchangeably with the term “Town Plan”, it is an in-depth, comprehensive, long range study that provides the framework for future decisions regarding land use, transportation, community facilities and services, utilities, natural resources, historic resources, and housing. It is a guide that establishes a strategy on how to grow while managing the community’s resources and maintaining a high quality of life. The Town Plan provides the basis for public and private investment. It also establishes an implementation program that provides a means of achieving the community vision. HARTFORD’S GEOGRAPHY Hartford, Vermont is located at the confluence of the White and Connecticut Rivers and includes a third river, the Ottauquechee. It is also at the junction of Interstate Highways 89 and 91 and the junction of U.S. Highways 4 and 5 on the eastern side of Vermont about halfway up the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Shrewsbury, Vermont Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
    Town of Shrewsbury, Vermont Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Date of Adoption Prepared by the Town of Shrewsbury With the assistance of The Rutland Regional Planning Commission Table of Contents 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………..……...2 2. Purpose……………………………………………………………………………………………..…..3 3. Community Background……………………………………………………………………………….3 4. Planning Process…………………..……………………………………………………………….…..6 4.1. Plan Changes……………………………………………………………………………………...7 5. Community Hazard Inventory and Risk Assessment…………………………………………………10 5.1. Low Risk Hazards………………………………………………………………………………..11 Aircraft Crashes……………………………………………………………………………….….11 Continuity of Government/Record Retention…………………………………………………….11 Hazardous Materials, Radiological and Chemical/Biological Incidents…………………………11 Drought…………………………………………………………………………………………...12 Earthquakes……………………………………………………………………………………….12 Structure Fires…………………………………………………………………………………….13 Temperature Extremes…………………………………………………………………………....13 Terrorism………………………………………………………………………………………….13 Water Supply Contamination………………………………………………………………….....13 Winter Storms, Ice Storms, and Power Outages………………………………………………....14 Wildfires and Forest Fires………………………………………………………………………..14 5.2. Medium Risk Hazards…………………………………………………………………………...14 Climate Change………………………………………………………………………………….14 Dam Failure……………………………………………………………………………………...14 5.3. High Risk Hazards……………………………………………………………………………….15 Floods, Fluvial Erosion, and Ice Jams…………………………………………………………...15 Highway and Railroad Accidents………………………………………………………………..17
    [Show full text]
  • The New Deal Versus Yankee Independence: the Failure of Comprehensive Development on the Connecticut River, and Its Long-Term Consequences
    The New Deal versus Yankee independence: The failure of comprehensive development on the Connecticut River, and its long-term consequences Eve Vogel1 Department of Geosciences, UMass Amherst With assistance from Alexandra Lacy 2011 alumna (BS, Environmental Sciences), UMass Amherst Adapted from: Vogel, Eve and Alexandra Lacy. Forthcoming. The New Deal versus Yankee independence: The failure of comprehensive development on the Connecticut River, and its long-term consequences. The Northeastern Geographer 4 (2) Introduction For a person familiar with federal dams on major rivers in the American West or South, a visit to an Army Corps of Engineers dam in New England’s largest river basin, the Connecticut, can be a startling experience. Instead of an extended reservoir, one looks down from the empty heights and on both sides sees only a small river far below. Nor is there the fanfare – the visitors center, the historical information, the celebratory propaganda. Simply finding one of the Connecticut River’s federal dams can take some effort. None are on the mainstem. One must drive through the bucolic New England byways and forested hills to find a dam on a tributary (See Figure 1). For New Englanders, the near-invisibility of federal dams may not seem surprising. New England’s history and identity, including the Connecticut Valley’s, seem to rest with the small- to medium-scale development of rivers with mill dams during the 17th thru 19th centuries (e.g. Delaney 1983; Steinberg 1991). It might be more startling for many to learn that during the mid- twentieth century, the federal government did build a series of very large dams in the Connecticut Basin, which have had profound effect on the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report on River Basin Water Quality Management Planning During 2010
    PROGRESS REPORT ON RIVER BASIN WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING DURING 2010 A REPORT FOR: HOUSE & SENATE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE HOUSE & SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENERGY JANUARY 2011 PREPARED BY: VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VT 05671 www.vtwaterquality.org Introduction..........................................................................................................................................................3 Section 1) Statewide Surface Water Management Strategy - a Framework for Statewide Efforts to Guide Surface Water Management.................................................................................................................................5 Protecting & Improving Surface Waters by Managing Stressors ....................................................................5 What are the 10 Major Stressors affecting Vermont’s surface waters? ...........................................................6 Using the Stressor Approach to Evaluate Program Effectiveness ...................................................................6 Tactical Basin Planning: Managing waters along a gradient of condition.......................................................6 WQD Ambient Surface Water Monitoring & Assessment Strategy................................................................6 Public Input......................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Legacy of a Backcountry Builder
    Legacy of a Backcountry Builder The mission of the Green Mountain Club is to make the Vermont mountains play a larger part in the life of the people by protecting and maintaining the Long Trail System and fostering, through education, the stewardship of Vermont’s hiking trails and mountains. © BRYAN PFEIFFER, WWW.BRYANPFEIFFER.COM PFEIFFER, © BRYAN Quarterly of the River Jewelwing (Calopteryx aequabilis) damselfly Green Mountain Club c o n t e n t s Michael DeBonis, Executive Director Jocelyn Hebert, Long Trail News Editor Summer 2015, Volume 75, No. 2 Richard Andrews, Volunteer Copy Editor Brian P. Graphic Arts, Design Green Mountain Club 4711 Waterbury-Stowe Road 5 / The Visitor Center:Features A Story of Community Waterbury Center, Vermont 05677 By Maureen Davin Phone: (802) 244-7037 Fax: (802) 244-5867 6 / Legacy of a Backcountry Builder: Matt Wels E-mail: [email protected] By Jocelyn Hebert Website: www.greenmountainclub.org The Long Trail News is published by The Green Mountain Club, Inc., a nonprofit organization found- 11 / Where NOBO and SOBO Meet ed in 1910. In a 1971 Joint Resolution, the Vermont By Preston Bristow Legislature designated the Green Mountain Club the “founder, sponsor, defender and protector of the Long Trail System...” 12 / Dragons in the Air Contributions of manuscripts, photos, illustrations, By Elizabeth G. Macalaster and news are welcome from members and nonmem- bers. Copy and advertising deadlines are December 22 for the spring issue; March 22 for summer; June 22 13 / Different Places, Different Vibes: for fall; and September 22 for winter. Caretaking at Camel’s Hump and Stratton Pond The opinions expressed by LTN contributors and By Ben Amsden advertisers are not necessarily those of GMC.
    [Show full text]
  • Hartland Plan Notes
    TOWN PLAN for HARTLAND, VERMONT ADOPTED JUNE 5, 2007 Assistance on this Plan was provided by the Two Rivers-Ottauquechee Regional Commission Hartland Town Plan – Adopted June 4, 2007 i TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE.....................................................................................................................................................1 OVERVIEW AND STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES ................................................................................2 Major Goals ............................................................................................................................. 2 CHAPTER 1: LAND USE............................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................... 3 Existing Land Use .................................................................................................................... 3 Growth Rate ............................................................................................................................. 3 Hartland Planning Survey........................................................................................................ 4 SITING ISSUES.......................................................................................................................... 4 Siting Policies: ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quechee Interactive Map and Guide
    Click on a Site for Photo and Additional Information to Quechee Gorge FORESTS, PARKS & RECREATION Quechee State Park VERMONT Quechee, Vermont AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES North LEGEND Park oce Free wi area 11 13 0 Prime campsite 9 0 Campsite HEMLOCK 14 48 ASH 49 Prime lean-to 37 Extra vehicle parking 7 12 10 38 WALNUT V 35 36 Restrooms BIRCH 15 2 HICKORY 34 Showers ($) 16 HACKBERRY 32 17 Accessible facility 6 31 18 33 Drinking water 4 47 19 30 boundary 5 46 RV Sanitary Station 44 20 Trash/Recycling center 3 45 29 28 V Volunteer Site 2 43 21 39 1 Foot trail V 27 1 Horseshoe pit 40 42 41 25 Volleyball 23 PINE Steep bank to Quechee Gorge 0 100 200 400 Visitor Center this map is intended for and Quechee Gorge informational purposes only to White River Jct & 89 feet to Quechee Village & Woodstock ephelps-rev 01/2018 4 Quechee State Park Quechee State Park amenities: Welcome to Quechee State Park. Its location • 45 tent/trailer sites along US Route 4, and its proximity to many Upper Valley • 7 lean-to shelters attractions make the park a popular tourist destination. • Quechee Gorge Visitor’s Center Quechee Hundreds of thousands of visitors stop each year to • Hiking take in the breathtaking views of Quechee Gorge. Other • Fishing in the Quechee Gorge visitors seeking an overnight stay enjoy the easy access to • Fishing and boating on Dewey Mills Pond the park’s spacious campsites. • Firewood & ice for sale State Park The focal point of the park is Vermont’s deepest gorge, formed by glacial activity more than 13,000 years Recreating and sightseeing ago.
    [Show full text]
  • WATERS THAT DRAIN VERMONT the Connecticut River Drains South
    WATERS THAT DRAIN VERMONT The Connecticut River drains south. Flowing into it are: Deerfield River, Greenfield, Massachusetts o Green River, Greenfield, Massachusetts o Glastenbury River, Somerset Fall River, Greenfield, Massachusetts Whetstone Brook, Brattleboro, Vermont West River, Brattleboro o Rock River, Newfane o Wardsboro Brook, Jamaica o Winhall River, Londonderry o Utley Brook, Londonderry Saxtons River, Westminster Williams River, Rockingham o Middle Branch Williams River, Chester Black River, Springfield Mill Brook, Windsor Ottauquechee River, Hartland o Barnard Brook, Woodstock o Broad Brook, Bridgewater o North Branch Ottauquechee River, Bridgewater White River, White River Junction o First Branch White River, South Royalton o Second Branch White River, North Royalton o Third Branch White River, Bethel o Tweed River, Stockbridge o West Branch White River, Rochester Ompompanoosuc River, Norwich o West Branch Ompompanoosuc River, Thetford Waits River, Bradford o South Branch Waits River, Bradford Wells River, Wells River Stevens River, Barnet Passumpsic River, Barnet o Joes Brook, Barnet o Sleepers River, St. Johnsbury o Moose River, St. Johnsbury o Miller Run, Lyndonville o Sutton River, West Burke Paul Stream, Brunswick Nulhegan River, Bloomfield Leach Creek, Canaan Halls Stream, Beecher Falls 1 Lake Champlain Lake Champlain drains into the Richelieu River in Québec, thence into the Saint Lawrence River, and into the Gulf of Saint Lawrence. Pike River, Venise-en-Quebec, Québec Rock River, Highgate Missisquoi
    [Show full text]
  • 110 Connecticut River Basin 01129200 Connecticut River Below Indian Stream, Near Pittsburg, Nh
    110 CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN 01129200 CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW INDIAN STREAM, NEAR PITTSBURG, NH LOCATION.--Lat 45° 02'25", long 71° 26'40", Coos County, Hydrologic Unit 01080101, on right bank, 1,200 ft downstream from Indian Stream, 2.7 mi west of US Highway 3 and State Highway 145 intersection in Pittsburg, 3.9 mi northeast of Post Office in Beecher Falls, and at mile 376.5. DRAINAGE AREA.--254 mi2. WATER-DISCHARGE RECORDS PERIOD OF RECORD.--October 1956 to current year. REVISED RECORDS.--WDR MA-NH-RI-VT-73-l: 1958, 1960(M), 1969(M). GAGE.--Water-stage recorder. Elevation of gage is 1,150 ft above National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929, from topographic map. REMARKS.--Records good except those for estimated daily discharges, which are fair. Flow regulated by First Connecticut and Second Connecticut Lakes and Lake Francis 3.7 mi upstream. EXTREMES FOR PERIOD OF RECORD.--Maximum discharge, 5,820 ft3/s, May 11, 2000, gage height, 8.37 ft; minimum daily 30 ft3/s, August 6, 1965. EXTREMES FOR CURRENT YEAR.--Maximum discharge, 2,400 ft3/s, Apr. 29, gage height, 5.20 ft; minimum daily discharge, 138 ft3/s, Sept. 5. DISCHARGE, CUBIC FEET PER SECOND WATER YEAR OCTOBER 2004 TO SEPTEMBER 2005 DAILY MEAN VALUES DAY OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 1 317 216 441 443 543 647 413 1,790 917 787 510 637 2 315 254 564 486 537 647 488 1,440 711 474 514 240 3 313 359 431 544 531 641 826 1,230 612 465 532 171 4 313 339 377 594 527 503 1,630 977 542 455 481 148 5 313 349 346 627 527 426 1,280 749 490 455 429 138 6 313 381 275 597 524 426 984
    [Show full text]