HRA Preferred Sites and Settlement Boundaries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Habitats Regulations Assessment of Breckland Local Plan – Preferred Site Options and Settlement Boundaries Habitats Regulations Assessment of Breckland Local Plan – Preferred Site Options and Settlement Boundaries Habitats Regulations Assessment of Breckland Local Plan Part 1 – Preferred Site Options and Settlement Boundaries Footprint Contract Reference: 297 Date: 18th September 2016 Recommended Citation: Liley, D. & Hoskin, R. (2016). Habitat Regulations Assessment of the Breckland Local Plan Part 1 - Preferred Site Options and Settlement Boundaries. Footprint Ecology, unpublished report for Breckland Council. Habitats Regulations Assessment of Breckland Local Plan – P r e f e r r e d Site Options and Settlement Boundaries Summary Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) is required in accordance with the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, as amended, in order to ensure that plans and projects do not adversely affect any European wildlife sites. All planning documents forming part of a local plan are the subject of HRA, which is the responsibility of the plan making body to produce. This report provides the HRA of the Breckland Local Plan, being undertaken by the Breckland Council. This report is an assessment of the ‘Preferred Site Options and Settlement Boundaries’ which follows on from the recent publication of the’ Preferred Directions’ document. Consultation responses from both documents will be used to develop a draft Local Plan Part 1 for Breckland. This HRA was produced based on a draft of the Preferred Site Options and Settlement Boundaries, which was shared with Footprint Ecology in August 2016. This HRA should be read in conjunction with earlier HRA work that has been prepared to support the preparation of the Local Plan. That previous work includes a background and review of evidence report setting out initial background and evidence gathering work, which was undertaken in the early stages of the development of the new Local Plan, HRA of the plan at Issues and Options stage and a HRA of the Preferred Directions document. The background and review of evidence report provides the background and underpinning evidence for this assessment, identifying information available for use within this HRA, including the protection of European sites to date, as a result of the implementation of the current plan (the Breckland Core Strategy). That report highlights potential concerns and opportunities relating to protection of European sites to inform the new Local Plan now being prepared to replace the Core Strategy. HRAs remain as working documents, being continually updated to inform the various stages of plan making, until the finalisation of the plan for adoption by the Council. This HRA assesses the preferred options for delivering growth through options for development. It includes a check of emerging policy in relation to site options and settlement boundaries in the plan for any likely significant effects on any European site. This screening provides Breckland Council with a number of recommendations for text changes and additions to strengthen protection of European sites within the plan and incorporate measures to avoid risks. The screening has identified several of key issues for further (more detailed) assessment, and appropriate assessment has been undertaken for impacts relating to development presence, urban effects (including recreation), traffic and roads, water and air quality. Each topic heading forms a separate section in this report. Current information and analysis has allowed positive progression towards ensuring that the Local Plan will not adversely affect European sites, but it remains too early to draw a legislation compliant conclusion, and the assessment will continue to seek solutions to achieve this as the information gaps are filled and the plan develops towards its submission stage. Key information gaps include the Water Cycle Study and Strategic Flood Risk Assessment and overall changes in traffic flows and therefore air quality impacts to European sites. These pieces of evidence will need to be considered in the assessment of the next iteration of the Local Plan. 1 Habitats Regulations Assessment of Breckland Local Plan – P r e f e r r e d Site Options and Settlement Boundaries Within the assessment we have reviewed buffers relating to stone curlews, using up-to date data from the RSPB. We have included recommendations for changes to the buffers, based on more recent data and later versions of the Plan will need to refer to these or show them on maps within the Plan. 2 Habitats Regulations Assessment of Breckland Local Plan – P r e f e r r e d Site Options and Settlement Boundaries Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................... 6 Habitats Regulations Assessment process ............................................................... 7 A positive approach to assessing the plan and informing its progression ................. 8 New policy direction since the Preferred Directions publication .............................. 9 European sites ...................................................................................................... 10 2. Previous evidence to inform the HRA ................................................. 12 Previous evidence used ........................................................................................ 12 Visitor surveys ............................................................................................................... 12 Stone Curlew ................................................................................................................. 12 Nightjar and Woodlark ................................................................................................... 12 Measures in place to mitigate for current planning policy risks ............................. 14 Current Status of mitigation measures and recommendations for progression ..... 15 3. New evidence to inform the HRA ....................................................... 17 Updated Stone Curlew data .................................................................................. 17 Updated GIS analysis of sites proposed for development ...................................... 17 Norfolk wide evidence gathering on recreation impacts ........................................ 17 4. Screening the plan for likely significant effects ................................... 18 5. Appropriate Assessment – Overview and Scope ................................. 21 Setting the context for the appropriate assessment .............................................. 21 6. Appropriate Assessment – Presence of Buildings/Development ........ 24 Findings from previous HRA at Preferred Directions.............................................. 24 Assessment for Preferred Site Options and Settlement Boundaries ...................... 24 New analysis in light of up to date stone curlew data ...................................................... 24 Revised Buffers .............................................................................................................. 25 3 Habitats Regulations Assessment of Breckland Local Plan – P r e f e r r e d Site Options and Settlement Boundaries Check of revised buffers against locations within the Preferred Sites Options and Settlement Boundaries ......................................................................................... 29 Mitigation/Implications for Draft Plan .................................................................. 29 7. Appropriate Assessment - Urban effects (including recreational disturbance)................................................................................................. 31 Findings from previous HRA at Preferred Directions.............................................. 31 Assessment for Preferred Site Options and Settlement Boundaries ...................... 32 Mitigation/Implications for Draft Plan .................................................................. 32 Findings from previous HRA at Preferred Directions.............................................. 34 Assessment for Preferred Site Options and Settlement Boundaries ...................... 34 Mitigation/Implications for Draft Plan .................................................................. 34 9. Appropriate Assessment - Water ....................................................... 35 Findings from previous HRA at Preferred Directions.............................................. 35 Assessment for Preferred Site Options and Settlement Boundaries ...................... 35 Mitigation/Implications for Draft Plan .................................................................. 35 10. Summary and Next Steps ................................................................... 36 11. References ......................................................................................... 37 12. Appendix 1 - The Habitats Regulations Assessment Process ............... 41 13. Appendix 2 – European Site Conservation Objectives ......................... 45 14. Appendix 3 - Conservation Interest of European Sites ........................ 47 15. Appendix 4 - Screening for Likely Significant Effects ........................... 53 4 Habitats Regulations Assessment of Breckland Local Plan – P r e f e r r e d Site Options and Settlement Boundaries Acknowledgements This report was commissioned by Breckland Council. Copies of the document to be assessed were provided by James Mann (Capita)
Recommended publications
  • Forest Heath District Council

    Forest Heath District Council

    Forest Heath District Council Single Issue Review Policy CS7 of the Core Strategy Document Habitats Regulations Assessment, (HRA), Screening Stage July 2012 Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Overview of the process to date 1.2 Background to Habitats Regulations Assessment 1.3 Outline of Habitats Regulations Assessment process 1.4 Introduction to the HRA screening process 2. European sites potentially affected by the Single Issue Review 3. Baseline conditions affecting European sites 4. Is it necessary to proceed to the next HRA stage? Which aspects of the document require further assessment? 4.1 Screening of the Single Issue Review 1 1. Introduction 1.1 Overview of the process to date: In order to ensure that the Single Issue Review is compliant with the requirements of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, Forest Heath District Council has embarked upon an assessment of the ‘Reviews’ implications for European wildlife sites, i.e. a Habitats Regulations Assessment of the plan. This report sets out the first stage of the HRA process for the Single Issue Review, the Screening Stage. To establish if the ‘Review’ is likely to have a significant adverse effect on any European sites it is necessary to consider evidence contained in the original HRA of the Forest Heath Core Strategy DPD that was produced in March 2009. For a number of policies within the Core Strategy, including the original Policy CS7, it was considered either that significant effects would be likely, or that a precautionary approach would need to be taken as it could not be determined that those particular plan policies would not be likely to have a significant effect upon any European Site.
  • Landscape Character Assessment Documents 2

    Landscape Character Assessment Documents 2

    Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Landscape Character Assessment Documents 2. Breckland District Part 1 of 5 Applicant: Norfolk Vanguard Limited Document Reference: ExA; ISH; 10.D3.1E 2.1 Deadline 3 Date: February 2019 Photo: Kentish Flats Offshore Wind Farm May 2007 Breckland District Landscape Character Assessment Final Report for Breckland District Council by Land Use Consultants LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT OF BRECKLAND DISTRICT Final Report Prepared for Breckland Council by Land Use Consultants May 2007 43 Chalton Street London NW1 1JD Tel: 020 7383 5784 Fax: 020 7383 4798 [email protected] CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................... 1 PART 1: OVERVIEW 1. Introduction ......................................................................................... 1 The landscape of Breckland...................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of the report................................................................................................................................ 1 Structure of the report ............................................................................................................................. 1 2. Method Statement.............................................................................. 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Data collation
  • Habitats Regulation Assessment East Cambridgeshire Local Plan

    Habitats Regulation Assessment East Cambridgeshire Local Plan

    Habitats Regulation Assessment East Cambridgeshire Local Plan June 2018 (Supersedes the November 2017 Screening Report) Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................... 1 Non-Technical Summary .................................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 Background to the East Cambridgeshire Local Plan ..................................................................... 1 Key Components of the Emerging East Cambridgeshire Local Plan ............................................. 2 Potential Impacts Arising from the Local Plan ............................................................................... 5 Report Purpose and Overview ...................................................................................................... 6 2. Habitats Regulation Assessment - Legislation and Requirements ................................................ 8 HRA Guidance and Best Practice ................................................................................................. 8 Main Stages of HRA ..................................................................................................................... 9 Consultation with Natural England .............................................................................................
  • David Tyldesley and Associates Planning, Landscape and Environmental Consultants

    David Tyldesley and Associates Planning, Landscape and Environmental Consultants

    DAVID TYLDESLEY AND ASSOCIATES PLANNING, LANDSCAPE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Document Durwyn Liley, Rachel Hoskin, John Underhill-Day & David Tyldesley 1 DRAFT Date: 7th November 2008 Version: Draft Recommended Citation: Liley, D., Hoskin, R., Underhill-Day, J. & Tyldesley, D. (2008). Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Document. Footprint Ecology, Wareham, Dorset. Report for Breckland District Council. 2 Summary This document records the results of a Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) of Breckland District Council’s Core Strategy. The Breckland District lies in an area of considerable importance for nature conservation with a number of European Sites located within and just outside the District. The range of sites, habitats and designations is complex. Taking an area of search of 20km around the District boundary as an initial screening for relevant protected sites the assessment identified five different SPAs, ten different SACs and eight different Ramsar sites. Following on from this initial screening the assessment identifies the following potential adverse effects which are addressed within the appropriate assessment: • Reduction in the density of Breckland SPA Annex I bird species (stone curlew, nightjar, woodlark) near to new housing. • Increased levels of recreational activity resulting in increased disturbance to Breckland SPA Annex I bird species (stone curlew, nightjar, woodlark). • Increased levels of people on and around the heaths, resulting in an increase in urban effects such as increased fire risk, fly-tipping, trampling. • Increased levels of recreation to the Norfolk Coast (including the Wash), potentially resulting in disturbance to interest features and other recreational impacts.
  • 233 08 SD50 Environment Permitting Decision Document

    233 08 SD50 Environment Permitting Decision Document

    Environment Agency permitting decisions Bespoke permit We have decided to grant the permit for Didlington Farm Poultry Unit operated by Mr Robert Anderson, Mrs Rosamond Anderson and Mr Marcus Anderson. The permit number is EPR/EP3937EP. We consider in reaching that decision we have taken into account all relevant considerations and legal requirements and that the permit will ensure that the appropriate level of environmental protection is provided. Purpose of this document This decision document: • explains how the application has been determined • provides a record of the decision-making process • shows how all relevant factors have been taken into account • justifies the specific conditions in the permit other than those in our generic permit template. Unless the decision document specifies otherwise we have accepted the applicant’s proposals. Structure of this document • Key issues • Annex 1 the decision checklist • Annex 2 the consultation, web publicising responses. EPR/EP3937EP/A001 Page 1 of 12 Key Issues 1) Ammonia Impacts There are two Special Areas for Conservation (SAC) within 3.4km, one Special Protection Area (SPA) within 850m, seven Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) within 4.9km and six Local Wildlife Sites (LWS) within 1.4km of the facility, one of which is within 250m. Assessment of SAC and SPA If the Process Contribution (PC) is below 4% of the relevant critical level (CLe) or critical load (CLo) then the farm can be permitted with no further assessment. Initial screening using Ammonia Screening Tool (AST) v4.4 has indicated that the PC for Breckland SAC, Norfolk Valley Fens SAC and Breckland SPA is predicted to be greater than 4% of the CLe for ammonia.
  • Norfolk & Suffolk Brecks

    Norfolk & Suffolk Brecks

    NORFOLK & SUFFOLK BRECKS Landscape Character Assessment Page 51 Conifer plantations sliced with rides. An abrupt, changing landscape of dense blocks and sky. Page 34 The Brecks Arable Heathland Mosaic is at the core of the Brecks distinctive landscape. Page 108 Secret river valleys thread through the mosaic of heaths, plantations and farmland. BRECKS LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 04 Introduction Page 128 Local landscapes Context Introduction to the case studies Objectives Status Foulden Structure of the report Brettenham Brandon Page 07 Contrasting acidic and calcareous soils are Page 07 Evolution of the Mildenhall juxtaposed on the underlying Lackford landscape chalk Physical influences Human influences Page 146 The Brecks in literature Biodiversity Article reproduced by kind permission of Page 30 Landscape character the Breckland Society Landscape character overview Page 30 The Brecks Arable Structure of the landscape Heathland Mosaic is at the Annexes character assessment core of the Brecks identity Landscape type mapping at 1:25,000 Brecks Arable Heathland Mosaic Note this is provided as a separate Brecks Plantations document Low Chalk Farmland Rolling Clay Farmland Plateau Estate Farmland Settled Fen River Valleys Page 139 Brettenham’s Chalk River Valleys landscape today, explained through illustrations depicting its history 03 BREAKING NEW GROUND INTRODUCTION Introduction Context Sets the scene Purpose and timing of the study How the study should be used Status and strategic fit with other documents Structure of the report BRECKS LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION Introduction Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2013 Context Study Area (NCA 85) Study Area Buffer This landscape character assessment (LCA) County Boundary Castle Acre focuses on the Brecks, a unique landscape of District Boundary heaths, conifer plantations and farmland on part Main Road of the chalk plateau in south-west Norfolk and Railway north-west Suffolk.
  • Site Improvement Plan Breckland

    Site Improvement Plan Breckland

    Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 Sites (IPENS) Planning for the Future Site Improvement Plan Breckland Site Improvement Plans (SIPs) have been developed for each Natura 2000 site in England as part of the Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 sites (IPENS). Natura 2000 sites is the combined term for sites designated as Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protected Areas (SPA). This work has been financially supported by LIFE, a financial instrument of the European Community. The plan provides a high level overview of the issues (both current and predicted) affecting the condition of the Natura 2000 features on the site(s) and outlines the priority measures required to improve the condition of the features. It does not cover issues where remedial actions are already in place or ongoing management activities which are required for maintenance. The SIP consists of three parts: a Summary table, which sets out the priority Issues and Measures; a detailed Actions table, which sets out who needs to do what, when and how much it is estimated to cost; and a set of tables containing contextual information and links. Once this current programme ends, it is anticipated that Natural England and others, working with landowners and managers, will all play a role in delivering the priority measures to improve the condition of the features on these sites. The SIPs are based on Natural England's current evidence and knowledge. The SIPs are not legal documents, they are live documents that will be updated to reflect changes in our evidence/knowledge and as actions get underway.
  • A Review of the Ornithological Interest of Sssis in England

    A Review of the Ornithological Interest of Sssis in England

    Natural England Research Report NERR015 A review of the ornithological interest of SSSIs in England www.naturalengland.org.uk Natural England Research Report NERR015 A review of the ornithological interest of SSSIs in England Allan Drewitt, Tristan Evans and Phil Grice Natural England Published on 31 July 2008 The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. You may reproduce as many individual copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with Natural England, 1 East Parade, Sheffield, S1 2ET ISSN 1754-1956 © Copyright Natural England 2008 Project details This report results from research commissioned by Natural England. A summary of the findings covered by this report, as well as Natural England's views on this research, can be found within Natural England Research Information Note RIN015 – A review of bird SSSIs in England. Project manager Allan Drewitt - Ornithological Specialist Natural England Northminster House Peterborough PE1 1UA [email protected] Contractor Natural England 1 East Parade Sheffield S1 2ET Tel: 0114 241 8920 Fax: 0114 241 8921 Acknowledgments This report could not have been produced without the data collected by the many thousands of dedicated volunteer ornithologists who contribute information annually to schemes such as the Wetland Bird Survey and to their county bird recorders. We are extremely grateful to these volunteers and to the organisations responsible for collating and reporting bird population data, including the British Trust for Ornithology, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, the Joint Nature Conservancy Council seabird team, the Rare Breeding Birds Panel and the Game and Wildlife Conservancy Trust.
  • A Profile of Thetford

    A Profile of Thetford

    A Profile of Thetford August 2004 Compiled by Corah Carney Keystone Development Trust A Thetford Profile Introduction by Neil Stott, Chief Executive of Keystone Development Trust Welcome to the Thetford profile, a comprehensive and informative digest of local data. I hope you find the profile interesting and useful. Thetford faces many challenges, illustrated by the data contained in the profile – but numerous organisation and local people are working hard to build on Thetford’s many assets and regenerate the town, Thetford is changing. Since the 2001 Census there has been a significant amount of new housing built, investment in local infrastructure, major European investment in social and economic activity and new services and activities springing up – and a real will to make Thetford a better place to live, work, study and visit. Working together we can make a real difference. Neil Stott Chief Executive Keystone Development Trust 1 A Thetford Profile Purpose of The Thetford Profile The main purpose of compiling this document of current information is to provide a single source for much of the information about the Thetford area. In addition it provides an opportunity to highlight the common links between data sets and allows the user access to a unique compilation of data relating to the area. When viewed as a whole it also provides a fascinating insight into the area. It can also support both proposals and decisions for improvements. As with any data however, it is a snapshot, limited to a point in time and by the data available. The data is in this document has been collated from a variety of sources, the main one being the 2001 Census data from the Office of National Statistics Web-site.
  • Proposed Mineral Extraction Sites

    Proposed Mineral Extraction Sites

    Proposed Mineral Extraction Sites 104 Breckland Sites Map of proposed sites in Beetley (MIN 08, MIN 12, MIN 13, MIN 51) MIN 12 - land north of Chapel Lane, Beetley Site Characteristics • The 16.38 hectare site is within the parish of Beetley • The estimated sand and gravel resource at the site is 1,175,000 tonnes • The proposer of the site has given a potential start date of 2025 and estimated the extraction rate to be 80,000 tonnes per annum. Based on this information the full mineral resource at the site could be extracted within 15 years, therefore approximately 960,000 tonnes could be extracted within the plan period. • The site is proposed by Middleton Aggregates Ltd as an extension to an existing site. • The site is currently in agricultural use and the Agricultural Land Classification scheme classifies the land as being Grade 3. • The site is 3.7km from Dereham and 12km from Fakenham, which are the nearest towns. • A reduced extraction area has been proposed of 14.9 hectares, which creates standoff areas to the south west of the site nearest to the buildings on Chapel Lane, and to the north west of the site nearest the dwellings on Church Lane. Amenity: The nearest residential property is 11m from the site boundary. There are 21 sensitive receptors within 250m of the site boundary. The settlement of Beetley is 260m away and Old Beetley is 380m away. However, land at the north-west and south-west corners is not proposed to be extracted. Therefore the nearest residential property is 96m from the extraction area and there are 18 sensitive receptors within 250m of the proposed extraction area.
  • Wild Frontier Ecology

    Wild Frontier Ecology

    WILD FRONTIER ECOLOGY Snettisham Neighbourhood Plan Supporting Evidence for Habitats Regulations Assessment May 2017 Snettisham Neighbourhood Plan Wild Frontier Ecology Ltd Client details Report produced by: Robert Yaxley BSc CEcol CEnv MCIEEM [email protected] Report checked by: Seth Lambiase BSc MRes MSc MCIEEM Snettisham Parish Council Report authorised by: Unit 2 Cold Blow Farm Great Snoring Fakenham Norfolk NR21 0HF © All rights reserved, Wild Frontier Ecology Ltd 2017. No part of this document to be copied or re-used without the permission of the copyright holder. The data which we have prepared and provided is accurate, and has been prepared and provided in accordance with the CIEEM’s Code of Professional Conduct. We confirm that any opinions expressed are our best and professional bona fide opinions. Wild Frontier Ecology is ISO14001 accredited 2 Company Registered in England and Wales No. 4942219. Registered Office: Saxon House, Hellesdon Park Road, Drayton High Road, Norwich NR6 5DR Director: Robert Yaxley BSc (Hons) CEcol CEnv MCIEEM VAT Reg No. 887 4692 54 Supporting Evidence for Habitats Regulations Assessment 2 Snettisham Neighbourhood Plan Contents 1 Non-Technical Summary .................................................................... 4 2 Introduction ................................................................................... 5 3 Objectives .................................................................................... 11 4 European Protected Sites .................................................................
  • WILD FRONTIER ECOLOGY Borough Council of King’S Lynn and West Norfolk

    WILD FRONTIER ECOLOGY Borough Council of King’S Lynn and West Norfolk

    WILD FRONTIER ECOLOGY Borough Council of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Habitats Regulations Assessment of Detailed Policies and Sites Plan: Site Allocations and Development Management Policies – Proposed Submission Document September 2015 Borough Council of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Wild Frontier Ecology Ltd Client details Report produced by: Borough Council of King’s Lynn and West Robert Yaxley CEnv MCIEEM Norfolk Report checked by: Contact: Seth Lambiase MCIEEM Alan Gomm/ Peter Jermany Unit 2 Cold Blow Farm King’s Court Great Snoring Chapel Street Fakenham King’s Lynn Norfolk PE30 1EX NR21 0HF Tel: 01328 864633 Tel: 01553 616239 [email protected] [email protected] © All rights reserved, Wild Frontier Ecology Ltd 2015. No part of this document to be copied or re-used without the permission of the copyright holder. Company Registered in England and Wales No 4942219. Registered Office - Saxon House, Hellesdon Park Road, Drayton High Road, Norwich NR6 5DR Director Robert Yaxley BSc (Hons) CEnv MCIEEM. VAT Reg No. 887 4692 54 The data which we have prepared and provided is accurate, and has been prepared and provided in accordance with the CIEEM’s Code of Professional Conduct. We confirm that any opinions expressed are our best and professional bona fide opinions. This report conforms to the British Standard 42020:2013 Biodiversity – Code of practice for planning and development. Site Specific Proposals HRA 1 Borough Council of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 3 2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 6 2.1 REQUIREMENT FOR AN APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT FOR THE DETAILED POLICIES AND SITES PLAN ...........