Grain Size Clastic in Sedimentary Rocks

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Grain Size Clastic in Sedimentary Rocks Physical and chemical processes break up solid rock into smaller grains (particles). •Some grains, like rock pebbles, quartz grains, and mica flakes are basically fragments of the original rock. •Others, like clays, are chemical weathering products that grew in soils as other minerals weathered away. For example, as feldspars weather away they transform into tiny clay particles plus dissolved potassium, sodium, and calcium ions that wash away to the sea. Grains are transported by wind, water, ice, mudflows, and so on to places of deposition. Places of deposition could be desert sand dunes, deep ocean floors, river channels, river flood plains, or lakes, to name a few. All thin section images in this presentation are © Kurt Hollocher, 2004. These images may be freely used and copied for educational purposes. 1 The diagram on the left shows a simplified grain size chart for loose clastic sediment (e.g., sand, silt), and their respective sedimentary rocks (e.g., sandstone, siltstone). The pictures represent some of the places where one can find sediment of the grain sizes to the left. The top photo is of desert pavement. Mudflows and flash floods bring materials of all grain sizes to the desert floor. Wind then blows the fine- grained materials away, leaving pebbles and larger grains behind. The second photo is of a sand dune. The sand was blown from some sediment supply area and deposited here. Coarser-grained particles remained behind in the supply area, whereas silt and clay-size particles were blown away. The third photo is of a flood of the Mississippi River. The slow flow of the river through this housing tract permits mostly silt to transported and deposited. The bottom photo is of shale deposited on the floor of a sea. The weak currents permitted fine-grained clay to slowly settle and accumulate over many thousands of years. 2 Most clastic sediments have been sorted according to grain size. That is to say, the sediments have only a narrow range of grain sizes making up most of the deposit. The reason for this is that flowing water and air can carry particles only below a particular size. Larger particles won’t move and are left behind. At any particular flow speed, only the larger particles will be deposited and the finer ones will be carried away. The end result is that clastic sedimentary deposits typically have a narrow size range for most of the grains. 3 This is a set of photos of clastic rocks in thin section, and magnifications of 40x and 200x. The coarse sandstone has sand grains typically 1-2 mm across. The grains touch one another and make up most of the rock. Smaller grains were deposited in the quiet waters in the spaces between the grains. The fine sandstone has grains typically 0.2-0.5 mm across. Again, these grains touch one another and finer-grained material fills the space between the larger grains. Notice that many of the grains are rounded, indicative of long transport or exposure to a rough environment like a beach were the corners were worn off. The siltstone has grains in the size range 0.01-0.1 mm. Though some are in the sand range, most are smaller and in the silt range. The grungy- looking material in between the clear quartz grains is partly clay that has formed fthiitbkdffldifrom the in situ breakdown of feldspar grains. The shale is made almost entirely out of clay, though a few grains of quartz occur up to 0.02 mm across. Even at 200x most of the clay grains are not resolvable. The horizontal white lines in the left shale photo are cracks that formed while the rock was being cut to make the thin section. 4 This is a coarse sandstone because most of the volume of the rock is made up of sand grains between 1 and 2 mm, in the upper part of the sand size range. The grains touch one another, showing that there wasn’t a lot of fine-grained material to get in the way. Fine grained particles did fill in the gaps between the larger sand grains. Most of the grains seen here are of quartz, though any kind of mineral in this size range would be sand also. 5 This fine-grained sandstone is made up mostly of rounded quartz grains 0.2 to 0.5 mm across. Finer-grained material fills in the spaces between the sand grains. Rounded grains of quartz like this usually mean the individual grains were transported great distances in rivers and streams, or the grains spent time in a high- energy environment such as a beach. Rounding of angular grains is caused by the corners breaking off as they hit one another. 6 Siltstone is made up mostly of grains in the silt size range. Most of the grains in this rock are 0.01-0.1 mm across. At this scale it is difficult to actually see the smaller grains. 7 In shale the grains are mostly clay, and almost all are smaller than the thin section is thick, 0.03 mm. Although a few grains of silt-size quartz are visible (white specks) and possibly some charcoal (black specks), the clay is too fine-grained to see clearly even at high magnification. In particular, the grains are so small that ten to hundreds may be stacked up in the thickness of the thin section. The horizontal white lines are cracks that formed in the rock while the thin section was being made. 8 200x view of the coarse sandstone. The brown material is mostly iron hydroxide that precipitated from groundwater. It is one of the materials that cements this rock together. 9 200x view of the fine-grained sandstone. The reddish-brown layers are hematite, which originally helped cement this rock together. Clear quartz cement overgrows the hematite in some places. 10 200x view of the siltstone. Much of the grungy material is feldspar and mica that have weathered to clay between the time of deposition and now. This siltstone is mostly cemented by the clay that grew in place from feldspar weathering. 11 200x view of the shale. Notice that even at five times higher magnification, the shale does not look much different than at low magnification, because the clay minerals are still too small to see. 12 This is a small mudflow. Mudflows are viscous masses of loose material and water that flow downhill. They can have as much as about half sediment suspended in water, to as little as about 10% sediment. The important point is that in mudflows it is difficult for sediment particles to be separated according to grain size, which wind and water can do easily if it has <1% sediment in it. 13 The main point of showing this thin section is to see that the large grains are not touching each other. They are separated by, and so were deposited with, great masses of smaller grains of all sizes. The same is true for medium-size grains, small grains, and so on down to the clay size range. This sediment could not have been deposited by a steadily flowing stream. Other clastic sediments that tend to be poorly sorted according to grain size include glacial till and landslides. 14 Full size 40x view of the mudflow deposit showing the range of grain sizes, and showing that the larger grains are separated by smaller grains at all size scales. 15 Full size 200x view of the mudflow deposit. This shows large grains, small grains, and tiny grains <0.01 mm across. Still smaller grains are present but are too small to clearly see. The brown material is hematite that helps cement this rock together. 16 From moment to moment, or place to place, water or wind currents will vary with depth, eddies, flow speed, and so on. This causes different grain sizes to be transported and deposited in different places at different times, even in the same stream or the same stretch of desert. The patterns of grain size variation can help tell things about channel size and shape, flood plains, oxbow lakes, and so on. It is all part of the rock record that we read to extract an interesting story about the Earth’s history. 17.
Recommended publications
  • Data Dictionary for Grain-Size Data Tables
    Data Dictionary for Grain-Size Data Tables The table below describes the attributes (data columns) for the grain-size data tables presented in this report. The metadata for the grain-size data are not complete if they are not distibuted with this document. Attribute_Label Attribute_Definition SAMPLE ID Sediment Sample identification number DEPTH (cm) Sample depth interval, in centimeters Physical description of sediment textural group - describes the dominant grain size class of the sample (after Folk, 1954): SEDIMENT TEXTURE (Folk, 1954) Sand, Clayey Sand, Muddy Sand, Silty Sand, Sandy Clay, Sandy Mud, Sandy Silt, Clay, Mud, or Silt AVERAGED SAMPLE RUNS Number of sample runs (N) included in the averaged statistics or other relavant information MEAN GRAIN SIZE (mm) Mean grain size, in microns (after Folk and Ward, 1957) MEAN GRAIN SIZE STANDARD DEVIATION (mm) Standard deviation of mean grain size, in microns SORTING (mm) Sample sorting - the standard deviation of the grain size distribution, in microns (after Folk and Ward, 1957) SORTING STANDARD DEVIATION (mm) Standard deviation of sorting, in microns SKEWNESS (mm) Sample skewness - deviation of the grain size distribution from symmetrical, in microns (after Folk and Ward, 1957) SKEWNESS STANDARD DEVIATION (mm) Standard deviation of skewness, in microns KURTOSIS (mm) Sample kurtosis - degree of curvature near the mode of the grain size distribution, in microns (after Folk and Ward, 1957) KURTOSIS STANDARD DEVIATION (mm) Standard deviation of kurtosis, in microns MEAN GRAIN SIZE (ɸ) Mean
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Cement Stabilization on the Strength of the Bawen's Siltstone
    MATEC Web of Conferences 195, 03012 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819503012 ICRMCE 2018 The effect of cement stabilization on the strength of the Bawen’s siltstone Edi Hartono1,3, Sri Prabandiyani Retno Wardani2, and Agus Setyo Muntohar3,* 1 Ph.D Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia 2 Department of Civil Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia 3 Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia Abstract. Siltstones are predominantly found along the Bawen toll-road. Siltstone is degradable soil due to weather session. The soil is susceptible to the drying and wetting and the changes in moisture content. Thus, Siltstone is problematic soils in its bearing capacity when served as a subgrade or subbase. The main objective of this study was to investigate the effect of cement stabilization on the strength of Siltstone. The primary laboratory test to evaluate the strength was Unconfined Compression Strength (UCS) and California Bearing Ratio (CBR). The cement content was varied from 2 to 12 per cent by weight of the dry soil. The soils were collected from the Ungaran – Bawen toll road. The specimens were tested after seven days of moist-curing in controlled temperature room of 25oC. The CBR test was performed after soaking under water for four days to observe the swelling. The results show that the mudstones were less swelling after soaking. Cement-stabilized siltstone increased the CBR value and the UCS significantly. The addition of optimum cement content for siltstone stabilization was about 7 to 10 per cent. 1 Introduction Rock lithology that includes claystone, siltstone, mudstone and shale is also known as mudrocks.
    [Show full text]
  • A) Conglomerate B) Dolostone C) Siltstone D) Shale 1. Which
    1. Which sedimentary rock would be composed of 7. Which process could lead most directly to the particles ranging in size from 0.0004 centimeter to formation of a sedimentary rock? 0.006 centimeter? A) metamorphism of unmelted material A) conglomerate B) dolostone B) slow solidification of molten material C) siltstone D) shale C) sudden upwelling of lava at a mid-ocean ridge 2. Which sedimentary rock could form as a result of D) precipitation of minerals from evaporating evaporation? water A) conglomerate B) sandstone 8. Base your answer to the following question on the C) shale D) limestone diagram below. 3. Limestone is a sedimentary rock which may form as a result of A) melting B) recrystallization C) metamorphism D) biologic processes 4. The dot below is a true scale drawing of the smallest particle found in a sample of cemented sedimentary rock. Which sedimentary rock is shown in the diagram? What is this sedimentary rock? A) conglomerate B) sandstone C) siltstone D) shale A) conglomerate B) sandstone C) siltstone D) shale 9. Which statement about the formation of a rock is best supported by the rock cycle? 5. Which sequence of events occurs in the formation of a sedimentary rock? A) Magma must be weathered before it can change to metamorphic rock. A) B) Sediment must be compacted and cemented before it can change to sedimentary rock. B) C) Sedimentary rock must melt before it can change to metamorphic rock. C) D) Metamorphic rock must melt before it can change to sedimentary rock. D) 6. Which sedimentary rock formed from the compaction and cementation of fragments of the skeletons and shells of sea organisms? A) shale B) gypsum C) limestone D) conglomerate Base your answers to questions 10 and 11 on the diagram below, which is a geologic cross section of an area where a river has exposed a 300-meter cliff of sedimentary rock layers.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution and Grain Size Distribution of Bahamian Ooid Shoals From
    Movement and grain size distribution of Bahamian sand shoals from remote sensing Kathryn M. Stack Michael Lamb, Ralph Milliken, Sebastien Leprince, John Grotzinger California Institute of Technology KISS Monitoring Earth Surface Changes From Space II 3/30/10 Motivation: Understand how sediment moves underwater Transport Grain size Implicaons Evoluon of shallow Petroleum and natural CO2 reservoirs bathymetry gas reservoirs 2 How remote sensing data can help • Obtain a 2-D snapshot of a modern day shallow carbonate environment • Build up a time series of morphology and grain size • Quantify the distribution and movement of sediment at a variety of temporal and spatial scales –Tides versus storms? • Use the modern to better understand the 3-D patterns of porosity and permeability in the rock record The Bahamas: A modern carbonate environment Florida The Atlantic Ocean The Bahamas Cuba 100 km Google Earth Tongue of the Ocean Schooner Cays 20 km 20 km Exumas Lily Bank 2 km 2 km Tongue of the Ocean 10 km 1 Crest spacing ~ 1‐10 km Google Earth 3 Crest spacing ~ 100 m 2 1 km Crest spacing ~ 1 km ASTER, Band 1 20 m Sediment transport and bedform migration Bedform spatial scales = 5-10 cm, 1 m, 10-100 m, 1-10 km Temporal scales = Hours, days, years Δy Δx Transport Ideal Imaging Campaign • High enough spatial resolution to see bedform crests on a number of scales - Sub-meter resolution - Auto-detection system • High enough temporal resolution to distinguish between slow steady processes and storms - Image collection every 3 to 6 hours • Spectral resolution depending on bedform scale of interest Also useful: • High resolution water topography (sub-meter resolution) • Track currents, tides, and water velocity Application of COSI-Corr • Use the COSI-Corr software developed by Leprince et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Kenney Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Grand Canyon
    Michael Kenney Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Grand Canyon The Paleozoic Era spans about 250 Myrs of Earth History from 541 Ma to 254 Ma (Figure 1). Within Grand Canyon National Park, there is a fragmented record of this time, which has undergone little to no deformation. These still relatively flat-lying, stratified layers, have been the focus of over 100 years of geologic studies. Much of what we know today began with the work of famed naturalist and geologist, Edwin Mckee (Beus and Middleton, 2003). His work, in addition to those before and after, have led to a greater understanding of sedimentation processes, fossil preservation, the evolution of life, and the drastic changes to Earth’s climate during the Paleozoic. This paper seeks to summarize, generally, the Paleozoic strata, the environments in which they were deposited, and the sources from which the sediments were derived. Tapeats Sandstone (~525 Ma – 515 Ma) The Tapeats Sandstone is a buff colored, quartz-rich sandstone and conglomerate, deposited unconformably on the Grand Canyon Supergroup and Vishnu metamorphic basement (Middleton and Elliott, 2003). Thickness varies from ~100 m to ~350 m depending on the paleotopography of the basement rocks upon which the sandstone was deposited. The base of the unit contains the highest abundance of conglomerates. Cobbles and pebbles sourced from the underlying basement rocks are common in the basal unit. Grain size and bed thickness thins upwards (Middleton and Elliott, 2003). Common sedimentary structures include planar and trough cross-bedding, which both decrease in thickness up-sequence. Fossils are rare but within the upper part of the sequence, body fossils date to the early Cambrian (Middleton and Elliott, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • IC-29 Geology and Ground Water Resources of Walker County, Georgia
    IC 29 GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Information Circular 29 GEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF WALKER COUNTY, GEORGIA By Charles W. Cressler U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey ATLANTA 1964 CONTENTS Page Abstract _______________________________________________ -··---------------------------- _____________________ ----------------·----- _____________ __________________________ __ 3 In trodu ction ------------------------------------------ ________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Purpose and scope ------------------------------"--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Previous inv es tigati o ns ____ _____ ________ _______ __________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5 Geo Io gy _________________________________________________________________ --- ___________________ -- ___________ ------------- __________________ ---- _________________ ---- _______ 5 Ph ys i ogr a p hy ______________________________________________________ ---------------------------------------- __________________ -------------------------------- 5 Geo Io gi c his tory __________________________ _ __ ___ ___ _______ _____________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------- 5 Stratigraphy -·· __________________
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Variable Grain Size Distribution on Beach's
    Delft University of Technology Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Department of Hydraulic Engineering MSc Thesis THE EFFECT OF VARIABLE GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION ON BEACH’S MORPHOLOGICAL RESPONSE Graduation committee: Prof.dr.ir. A.J.H.M. Reniers Author: Dr.ir. Matthieu de Schipper Melike Koktas Ir. Tjerk Zitman Dr. Edith L. Gallagher May 2017 P a g e 2 | 67 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Field studies with in-situ sediment sampling demonstrate the spatial variability in grain size on a sandy beach. However, conventional numerical models that are used to simulate the coastal morphodynamics ignore this variability of sediment grain size and use a uniform grain size distribution of mostly around and assumed fine grain size. This thesis study investigates the importance of variable grain size distribution in a beach’s morphological response. For this purpose, first a field experiment campaign was conducted at the USACE Field Research Facility (FRF) in Duck, USA, in the spring of 2014. This experiment campaign was called SABER_Duck as an acronym for ‘Stratigraphy And BEach Response’. During SABER_Duck, in-situ swash zone grain size distribution, the prevailing hydrodynamic conditions and the time-series of the cross-shore bathymetry data were collected. The data confirmed a highly variable grain size distribution in the swash zone both vertically and horizontally. Additionally, the two trench survey observations showed the existence of continuous layers of coarse and fine sands comprising the beach stratigraphy. Secondly, a process based numerical coastal morphology model, XBeach, was chosen to simulate the beach profile response to wave and tidal action. A 1D cross-shore profile model was built and tested with the bathymetry data and accompanying boundary conditions that were collected during SABER_Duck.
    [Show full text]
  • Grain-Size Sorting in Grainflows at the Lee Side of Deltas
    Sedimentology (2005) 52, 291–311 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2005.00698.x Grain-size sorting in grainflows at the lee side of deltas MAARTEN G. KLEINHANS Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geosciences, Universiteit Utrecht, PO Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands (E-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT The sorting of sediment mixtures at the lee slope of deltas (at the angle of repose) is studied with experiments in a narrow, deep flume with subaqueous Gilbert-type deltas using varied flow conditions and different sediment mixtures. Sediment deposition and sorting on the lee slope of the delta is the result of (i) grains falling from suspension that is initiated at the top of the delta, (ii) kinematic sieving on the lee slope, (iii) grainflows, in which protruding large grains are dragged downslope by subsequent grainflows. The result is a fining upward vertical sorting in the delta. Systematic variations in the trend depend on the delta height, the migration celerity of the delta front and the flow conditions above the delta top. The dependence on delta height and migration celerity is explained by the sorting processes in the grainflows, and the dependence on flow conditions above the delta top is explained by suspension of fine sediment and settling on the lee side and toe of the delta. Large differences in sorting trends were found between various sediment mixtures. The relevance of these results with respect to sorting in dunes and bars in rivers and laboratory flumes is discussed and the elements for a future vertical sorting model are suggested.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Samples Description (PDF)
    OCS-Y-2321 Burger J 001 Waters Petroleum Advisors Ryan Massey / Jeff McBeth 1500'- 1530' SILTSTONE 70% light to medium gray with common white to light gray tuffaceous matrix, argillaceous, soft, easily friable; CLAYSTONE 30% medium gray, soft, friable 1530'- 1560' CLAYSTONE 100% medium gray, stiff to mushy, cohesive, soft, smooth 1560'- 1590' CLAYSTONE 100% medium gray, lumpy to mushy, soft, irregular cuttings habit, smooth to silty 1590'- 1620' CLAYSTONE 100% medium gray, lumpy to mushy, slightly adhesive, irregular cuttings habit, smooth, trace coal 1620'- 1650' CLAYSTONE 100% medium gray, lumpy to mushy, soft, mostly pulverulent, irregular cuttings habit, smooth, trace tuff 1650'- 1680' CLAYSTONE 100% medium gray, lumpy to mushy, soft, mostly pulverulent, irregular cuttings habit, smooth 1680'- 1710' CLAYSTONE 100% medium gray, lumpy to non-cohesive, pulverulent 1710'- 1740' No Sample 1740'- 1770' No Sample 1770'- 1800' CLAYSTONE 100% medium gray with trace light gray, lumpy to mushy, easily friable, blocky, smooth to waxy 1800'- 1830' CLAYSTONE 100% medium gray, mushy to malleable, silty, easily friable, common blocky 1830'- 1860' SILTSTONE 90% medium to light gray, easily friable, argillaceous; SANDSTONE 10% light gray, lower fine to upper very fine, calcareous cement, well sorted 1860'- 1890' SILTSTONE 95% medium gray, easily friable, argillaceous, occasionally carbonaceous; SANDSTONE 5% light gray, lower fine to upper very fine, slightly calcareous, well sorted 1890'- 1920' CLAYSTONE 60% medium gray, soft, earthy, crumbly; SILTSTONE
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Processes Study at Ocean Beach, San Francisco, CA: Summary of Data Collection 2004-2006
    Coastal Processes Study at Ocean Beach, San Francisco, CA: Summary of Data Collection 2004-2006 By Patrick L. Barnard, Jodi Eshleman, Li Erikson and Daniel M. Hanes Open-File Report 2007–1217 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Barnard, P.L.., Eshleman, J., Erikson, L., and Hanes, D.M., 2007, Coastal processes study at Ocean Beach, San Francisco, CA; summary of data collection 2004-2006: U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007- 1217, 171 p. [http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1217/]. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. ii Contents Executive Summary of Major Findings..................................................................................................................................1 Chapter 2 - Beach Topographic Mapping..............................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Maggie Williams Particle Size, Shape and Sorting: What Grains Can Tell Us
    Particle size, shape and sorting: what grains can tell us Maggie Williams Most sediments contain particles that have a range of sizes, so the mean or average grain size is used in description. Mean grain size of loose sediments is measured by size analysis using sieves Grain size >2mm Coarse grain size (Granules<pebble<cobbles<boulders) 0.06 to 2mm Medium grain size Sand: very coarse-coarse-medium-fine-very fine) <0.06mm Fine grain size (Clay<silt) Difficult to see Remember that for sediment sizes > fine sand, the coarser the material the greater the flow velocity needed to erode, transport & deposit the grains Are the grains the same size of different? What does this tell you? If grains are the same size this tells you that the sediment was sorted out during longer transportation (perhaps moved a long distance by a river or for a long time by the sea. If grains are of different sizes the sediment was probably deposited close to its source or deposited quickly (e.g. by a flood or from meltwater). Depositional environments Environment 1 Environment 2 Environment 3 Environment 4 Environment 5 Environment 6 Sediment size frequency plots from different depositional environments • When loose sediment collected from a sedimentary environment is washed and then sieved it is possible to measure the grain sizes in the sediment accurately. • The grain size distribution may then be plotted as a histogram or as a cumulative frequency curve. • Sediments from different depositional environments give different sediment size frequency plots. This shows the grain size distribution for a river sand.
    [Show full text]
  • Naturally Weird – Concretions
    NATURALLY WEIRD : CONCRETIONS by GRANT KEDDIE, ROYAL B.C. MUSEUM. 1998. INTRODUCTION They assume fantastic and complex forms. They look like an exotic fossil, an animal carved by an ancient artist or something from another planet. One of the most common items that arouse excitement in people, and which are brought frequently to Museums for identification, are sedimentary stone structures called concretions. They are widespread and found in a great variety of unusual shapes - that range in size from a garden pea to giant spheroidal balls three meters in diameter. The joining or inter-growth of several elongate or disc shaped concretions often produce a kind of symmetry which, to the untrained eye, suggests they must have been made by human hands. Natural Siltstone Concretions with an animal-like appearance. WHAT ARE CONCRETIONS ? Concretions are natural objects which originate in soft sediments such as sands, soft sandstones, clays and shale. They are hardened areas, usually of a different colour, inside another rock. They are produced by the precipitation of minerals from percolating ground waters. Common simple concretions in siltstone and sandstone. Concretions usually form in geologic deposits where there are no stones or rock fragments. The bedding planes of enclosing sediments are often observed passing through them, indicating that they were formed after deposition of the sediments. A concretion is started by minerals accumulating in the pores of sediment about a nucleus or centre. This nucleus is frequently of organic origin, but inorganic substances such as sand are also common. The binding constituents of concretions are those which normally play the role of cement in the rocks in which these structures occur.
    [Show full text]