Distinguishing Autoimmune Myelofibrosis from Primary Myelofibrosis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Distinguishing Autoimmune Myelofibrosis from Primary Myelofibrosis Distinguishing Autoimmune Myelofibrosis from Primary Myelofibrosis Bridget Marcellino, MD, PhD, Siraj M. El Jamal, MD, and John O. Mascarenhas, MD The authors are affiliated with the Abstract: Bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) is a histologic finding in Icahn School of Medicine at Mount a wide range of diseases, including malignancies, endocrine Sinai in New York, New York. Dr disorders, autoimmune diseases, and infections. Autoimmune Marcellino is a hematology/oncology myelofibrosis (AIMF) is an uncommon etiology of BMF; it can be fellow at the Tisch Cancer Institute, Dr Mascarenhas is the leader of the secondary to a defined autoimmune disease, or it can be primary Myeloproliferative Disorders Clinical in the absence of a clinically diagnosed autoimmune disease but Research Program at the Tisch Cancer the presence of serologic evidence of autoantibodies. Distinguish- Institute, and Dr El Jamal is a patholo- ing between primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and non-neoplastic AIMF gist in the Department of Pathology. is of the utmost importance because the prognosis and therapeutic options are different. This distinction, however, can be complicat- Corresponding author: ed by overlapping findings in the 2 disease entities. Here, using the John Mascarenhas, MD case of a patient with BMF in the setting of idiopathic thrombocy- Associate Professor of Medicine topenic purpura and autoimmune hemolytic anemia, we present Icahn School of Medicine at a systematic approach to distinguishing between PMF and AIMF. Mount Sinai One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1079 New York, NY 10029 Tel: (212) 241-3417 Introduction Fax: (212) 876-5276 E-mail: [email protected] Bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) can arise from a wide span of condi- tions, ranging from malignancies to non-neoplastic entities such as infections, endocrine disorders, and autoimmune disease (Table 1).1 BMF is commonly seen in the setting of hematologic malignancies, including myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), mast cell diseases, and rarely in lymphopro- liferative disorders. The most common cause of BMF is primary myelofibrosis (PMF).2,3 It is important to note, however, that BMF has also been reported to be associated with the clinical use of thrombopoietin-receptor agonists.4 Autoimmune myelofibrosis (AIMF) is an uncommon etiology of BMF and is most often accompanied by other autoimmune dis- eases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. When BMF is associated with a defined autoimmune disease, it is termed secondary AIMF.5 However, in the absence of a primary auto- immune disease driving BMF, but the presence of serologic evidence of autoimmunity, it is termed primary AIMF. Primary AIMF is often associated with benign hematologic conditions, such as autoimmune hemolytic anemia, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), and 6 Keywords Evans syndrome. Studies have shown that up to 40% of patients Autoimmune myelofibrosis, bone marrow fibrosis, with ITP have BMF, with the majority demonstrating minimal primary myelofibrosis reticulin fibrosis.7,8 Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology Volume 16, Issue 9 September 2018 619 MARCELLINO ET AL It is imperative to differentiate AIMF from PMF Table 1. Disorders Associated With Myelofibrosis because the clinical course, prognostic implication, and treatment options are vastly different. The ability to Infectious diseases distinguish between the 2 disease entities is often com- - Tuberculosis plicated by overlapping pathologic features and the fact Endocrine disorders that autoimmune abnormalities, such as the presence of - Hyperparathyroidism (primary or secondary) autoimmune serologies, can be identified in both enti- - Vitamin D deficiency (nutritional or rickets) ties.9 Cytokine-dependent mechanisms drive BMF in - Osteomalacia both AIMF and PMF; however, the predominant source Autoimmune disorders of cytokines—including transforming growth factor beta - Systemic lupus erythematosus (TGF-β), interferon gamma (IFN-γ), interleukin 8 (IL- - Sjögren syndrome 8), IL-2, IL-17, and lipocalin-2 (LCN2)—likely differs, - Systemic sclerosis with cytokines derived from lymphoid aggregates driving - Primary autoimmune myelofibrosis AIMF and those derived from megakaryocytes and plate- - Connective tissue disease lets mediating fibrosis in PMF.1,10-12 Ultimately, clonality Hematologic malignancies is a defining feature of PMF, and a driver mutation (JAK2, - Myeloproliferative neoplasms (primary myelofibrosis, MPL, or CALR) is found in 90% of cases.13,14 polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia) The morphologic criteria that favor AIMF rather - Myelodysplastic syndrome than PMF, as proposed by Vergara-Lluri and colleagues, - Chronic myelogenous leukemia - Hodgkin lymphoma are the following: - Non-Hodgkin lymphoma - Acute myeloid leukemia (particularly acute megakaryo- 1. Rarity or absence of a leukoerythroblastic reaction in blastic leukemia) the peripheral blood, including absence of teardrop - Acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells, nucleated red blood cells (RBCs), and blasts; - Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2. Absence of peripheral eosinophilia or basophilia; - Multiple myeloma 3. Mild degree of BMF (usually MF1); - Systemic mastocytosis 4. Absence of osteosclerosis and bone changes; Other hematologic conditions 5. Presence of hypercellular marrow characterized by ery- - Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria throid and megakaryocytic hyperplasia (vs granulocytic - Gray platelet syndrome hyperplasia in PMF); Drug-associated conditions 5. Presence of lymphoid aggregates; and - Thrombopoietin receptor agonist toxicity 6. Absence of dysplastic features in any of the lineages, Other 15 especially the megakaryocytes. - Primary hypertrophic osteoarthropathy - Paget disease These criteria distinguish AIMF from PMF; how- - Metastatic solid malignancies ever, the distinction can remain nebulous when not all of the criteria are met. In these scenarios, it is crucial to consider the whole clinical picture in context, including the clinical presentation, time line of the disease course, without any bleeding complications. After 10 years, hypo- results of assessment for autoantibodies, bone marrow thyroidism was diagnosed and levothyroxine initiated. He pathologic findings, and results of chromosomal/genetic was still thrombocytopenic at this time and was given studies. Here, we present a case of presumed AIMF with a diagnosis of ITP; no treatment was initiated. Several associated autoimmune-mediated hemolytic anemia and months ago, he presented to his local hematologist with ITP to exemplify the process of distinguishing between complaints of dyspnea, dizziness, lightheadedness, ankle PMF and AIMF. swelling, and easy bruising. No constitutional symptoms were reported. He was found to have a hemoglobin level Case of 6.8 g/dL and a platelet count of 1000/µL, with a nor- mal white blood cell count and differential. He received a Clinical Presentation transfusion of packed red blood cells and platelets, which A 57-year-old man presented to our clinic for consultation led to the resolution of his presenting symptoms. regarding chronic thrombocytopenia. He had been found to have a platelet count of 10,000/µL 15 years prior but Laboratory Assessment did not pursue an evaluation. He was lost to follow-up, The patient was assessed for evidence of hematologic 620 Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology Volume 16, Issue 9 September 2018 DISTINGUISHING AUTOIMMUNE MYELOFIBROSIS FROM PRIMARY MYELOFIBROSIS Table 2. Results of Our Patient’s Laboratory Assessment agglutination, rouleaux, or polychromasia. A bone mar- row aspiration procedure produced a dry tap result. The White blood cell count, 11.5 biopsy specimen showed hypercellular marrow (90%) 103/µL with trilineage hematopoiesis and full maturation; also Hemoglobin, g/dL 6.8 noted was a disproportionate increase in atypical mega- Platelet count, 103/µL 1000 karyocytes seen singly and in clusters, with pleomorphism characterized by hypolobated and focally hyperlobated Iron, µg/dL 23 nuclei. Several small lymphocytic aggregates contained TIBC, µg/dL 359 CD3+ T lymphocytes and CD20+ B lymphocytes. Transferrin saturation, % 6 There was no evidence of dysplasia or excess plasma cells. Ferritin, ng/mL 49 Reticulin staining showed moderate to marked reticulin fibrosis (MF2-3/3), and trichrome staining was negative Folate, ng/mL 17.05 for collagen fibrosis. Vitamin B12, pg/mL 570 Erythropoietin, mIU/mL 56.6 Evaluation for Primary Myelofibrosis Coombs test Positive: The workup for a myeloproliferative neoplasm was 2+ positive DAT polyspecific largely unremarkable. Spleen size was normal by axial 2+ positive DAT IgG computed tomography. Peripheral blood cytogenetics 2+ positive DAT C3 showed a normal karyotype. Next-generation sequencing Platelet antibodies Positive of 44 myeloid-relevant genes in his peripheral blood cells ESR, mm/h 86 revealed a GATA2 mutation of unknown significance with a variant allele frequency of 49%, suggesting germ- CRP, mg/L 2.3 line origin. JAK2, MPL, and CALR were wild-type. ANA Positive (>1:80) Rheumatoid factor, IU/mL Negative (<15) Clinical Course Rheumatologic antibody Negative The patient was put on a trial of prednisone at 20 mg daily panel (anti–smooth muscle for presumed AIMF. After 1 month of treatment, the ane- Ab, anti–mitochondrial mic and thrombocytopenic cell counts had returned to Ab, anti–PR3/MPO Abs, nearly normal values. The prednisone was tapered, and anti-SSA and anti-SSB Abs, the patient will be followed to ensure the durability
Recommended publications
  • Updates in Mastocytosis
    Updates in Mastocytosis Tryptase PD-L1 Tracy I. George, M.D. Professor of Pathology 1 Disclosure: Tracy George, M.D. Research Support / Grants None Stock/Equity (any amount) None Consulting Blueprint Medicines Novartis Employment ARUP Laboratories Speakers Bureau / Honoraria None Other None Outline • Classification • Advanced mastocytosis • A case report • Clinical trials • Other potential therapies Outline • Classification • Advanced mastocytosis • A case report • Clinical trials • Other potential therapies Mastocytosis symposium and consensus meeting on classification and diagnostic criteria for mastocytosis Boston, October 25-28, 2012 2008 WHO Classification Scheme for Myeloid Neoplasms Acute Myeloid Leukemia Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia Myelodysplastic Syndromes MDS/MPN, unclassifiable Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia MDS/MPN Polycythemia Vera Essential Thrombocythemia Primary Myelofibrosis Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Chronic Neutrophilic Leukemia Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia, NOS Hypereosinophilic Syndrome Mast Cell Disease MPNs, unclassifiable Myeloid or lymphoid neoplasms Myeloid neoplasms associated with PDGFRA rearrangement associated with eosinophilia and Myeloid neoplasms associated with PDGFRB abnormalities of PDGFRA, rearrangement PDGFRB, or FGFR1 Myeloid neoplasms associated with FGFR1 rearrangement (EMS) 2017 WHO Classification Scheme for Myeloid Neoplasms Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Acute Myeloid Leukemia Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Juvenile Myelomonocytic
    [Show full text]
  • Mutation Analysis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms AHS - M2101
    Corporate Medical Policy Mutation Analysis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms AHS - M2101 File Name: mutation_analysis_in_myeloproliferative_neoplasms Origination: 1/1/2019 Last CAP review: 8/2021 Next CAP review: 8/2022 Last Review: 8/2021 Description of Procedure or Service Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a heterogeneous group of clonal disorders characterized by overproduction of one or more differentiated myeloid lineages (Grinfeld, Nangalia, & Green, 2017). These include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). The majority of MPN result from somatic mutations in the 3 driver genes, JAK2, CALR, and MPL, which represent major diagnostic criteria in combination with hematologic and morphological abnormalities (Rumi & Cazzola, 2017). Related Policies: BCR-ABL 1 Testing for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia AHS-M2027 ***Note: This Medical Policy is complex and technical. For questions concerning the technical language and/or specific clinical indications for its use, please consult your physician. Policy BCBSNC will provide coverage for mutation analysis in myeloproliferative neoplasms when it is determined to be medically necessary because the medical criteria and guidelines shown below are met. Benefits Application This medical policy relates only to the services or supplies described herein. Please refer to the Member's Benefit Booklet for availability of benefits. Member's benefits may vary according to benefit design; therefore member benefit language should be reviewed before applying the terms of this medical policy. When Mutation Analysis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms is covered 1. JAK2, CALR or MPL mutation testing is considered medically necessary for the diagnosis of patients presenting with clinical, laboratory, or pathological findings suggesting classic forms of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), that is, polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), or primary myelofibrosis (PMF) when ordered by a hematology and/or oncology specialist in the following situations: A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clinical Management of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Eric Padron, MD, Rami Komrokji, and Alan F
    The Clinical Management of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Eric Padron, MD, Rami Komrokji, and Alan F. List, MD Dr Padron is an assistant member, Dr Abstract: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is an Komrokji is an associate member, and Dr aggressive malignancy characterized by peripheral monocytosis List is a senior member in the Department and ineffective hematopoiesis. It has been historically classified of Malignant Hematology at the H. Lee as a subtype of the myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) but was Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute in Tampa, Florida. recently demonstrated to be a distinct entity with a distinct natu- ral history. Nonetheless, clinical practice guidelines for CMML Address correspondence to: have been inferred from studies designed for MDSs. It is impera- Eric Padron, MD tive that clinicians understand which elements of MDS clinical Assistant Member practice are translatable to CMML, including which evidence has Malignant Hematology been generated from CMML-specific studies and which has not. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute This allows for an evidence-based approach to the treatment of 12902 Magnolia Drive CMML and identifies knowledge gaps in need of further study in Tampa, Florida 33612 a disease-specific manner. This review discusses the diagnosis, E-mail: [email protected] prognosis, and treatment of CMML, with the task of divorcing aspects of MDS practice that have not been demonstrated to be applicable to CMML and merging those that have been shown to be clinically similar. Introduction Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hemato- logic malignancy characterized by absolute peripheral monocytosis, ineffective hematopoiesis, and an increased risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Evolving from JAK 2-Positive Primary Myelofibrosis and Concomitant CD5-Negative Mantle Cell
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Case Reports in Hematology Volume 2012, Article ID 875039, 6 pages doi:10.1155/2012/875039 Case Report Acute Myeloid Leukemia Evolving from JAK 2-Positive Primary Myelofibrosis and Concomitant CD5-Negative Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature Diana O. Treaba,1 Salwa Khedr,1 Shamlal Mangray,1 Cynthia Jackson,1 Jorge J. Castillo,2 and Eric S. Winer2 1 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA 2 Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Miriam Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI 02904, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Diana O. Treaba, [email protected] Received 2 April 2012; Accepted 21 June 2012 Academic Editors: E. Arellano-Rodrigo, G. Damaj, and M. Gentile Copyright © 2012 Diana O. Treaba et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Primary myelofibrosis (formerly known as chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis), has the lowest incidence amongst the chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms and is characterized by a rather short median survival and a risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) noted in a small subset of the cases, usually as a terminal event. As observed with other chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms, the bone marrow biopsy may harbor small lymphoid aggregates, often assumed reactive in nature. In our paper, we present a 70-year-old Caucasian male who was diagnosed with primary myelofibrosis, and after 8 years of followup and therapy developed an AML.
    [Show full text]
  • Outcomes for Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Acute Leukemia Or Myelodysplastic Syndrome
    Leukemia (2016) 30, 325–330 © 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0887-6924/16 www.nature.com/leu ORIGINAL ARTICLE Outcomes for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome FP Tambaro1, G Garcia-Manero2, SM O'Brien2, SH Faderl3, A Ferrajoli2, JA Burger2, S Pierce2, X Wang4, K-A Do4, HM Kantarjian2, MJ Keating2 and WG Wierda2 Acute leukemia (AL) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) are uncommon in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We retrospectively identified 95 patients with CLL, also diagnosed with AL (n = 38) or MDS (n = 57), either concurrently (n =5)or subsequent (n = 90) to CLL diagnosis and report their outcomes. Median number of CLL treatments prior to AL and MDS was 2 (0–9) and 1 (0–8), respectively; the most common regimen was purine analog combined with alkylating agent±CD20 monoclonal antibody. Twelve cases had no prior CLL treatment. Among 38 cases with AL, 33 had acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), 3 had acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL; 1 Philadelphia chromosome positive), 1 had biphenotypic and 1 had extramedullary (bladder) AML. Unfavorable AML karyotype was noted in 26, and intermediate risk in 7 patients. There was no association between survival from AL and number of prior CLL regimens or karyotype. Expression of CD7 on blasts was associated with shorter survival. Among MDS cases, all International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) were represented; karyotype was unfavorable in 36, intermediate in 6 and favorable in 12 patients; 10 experienced transformation to AML. Shorter survival from MDS correlated with higher risk IPSS, poor-risk karyotype and increased number of prior CLL treatments.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutations and Prognosis in Primary Myelofibrosis
    Leukemia (2013) 27, 1861–1869 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0887-6924/13 www.nature.com/leu ORIGINAL ARTICLE Mutations and prognosis in primary myelofibrosis AM Vannucchi1, TL Lasho2, P Guglielmelli1, F Biamonte1, A Pardanani2, A Pereira3, C Finke2, J Score4, N Gangat2, C Mannarelli1, RP Ketterling5, G Rotunno1, RA Knudson5, MC Susini1, RR Laborde5, A Spolverini1, A Pancrazzi1, L Pieri1, R Manfredini6, E Tagliafico7, R Zini6, A Jones4, K Zoi8, A Reiter9, A Duncombe10, D Pietra11, E Rumi11, F Cervantes12, G Barosi13, M Cazzola11, NCP Cross4 and A Tefferi2 Patient outcome in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is significantly influenced by karyotype. We studied 879 PMF patients to determine the individual and combinatorial prognostic relevance of somatic mutations. Analysis was performed in 483 European patients and the seminal observations were validated in 396 Mayo Clinic patients. Samples from the European cohort, collected at time of diagnosis, were analyzed for mutations in ASXL1, SRSF2, EZH2, TET2, DNMT3A, CBL, IDH1, IDH2, MPL and JAK2. Of these, ASXL1, SRSF2 and EZH2 mutations inter-independently predicted shortened survival. However, only ASXL1 mutations (HR: 2.02; Po0.001) remained significant in the context of the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS). These observations were validated in the Mayo Clinic cohort where mutation and survival analyses were performed from time of referral. ASXL1, SRSF2 and EZH2 mutations were independently associated with poor survival, but only ASXL1 mutations held their prognostic relevance (HR: 1.4; P ¼ 0.04) independent of the Dynamic IPSS (DIPSS)-plus model, which incorporates cytogenetic risk. In the European cohort, leukemia-free survival was negatively affected by IDH1/2, SRSF2 and ASXL1 mutations and in the Mayo cohort by IDH1 and SRSF2 mutations.
    [Show full text]
  • Myelofibrosis (MF)
    Myelofibrosis (MF) A Guide for Patients Introduction Being diagnosed with myelofibrosis (MF) can be a shock, particularly when you may have never heard of it. If you have questions about MF – what causes it, who it affects, how it affects your body, what symptoms to expect and likely treatments – this booklet covers the basics for you. You will also find useful advice Haematologist at University about how to get the best from Hospital of Wales, Cardiff. We your haematologist, plus practical are also grateful to Chris Rogers, advice on how to help important patient reviewer, for his valuable people in your life understand contribution. The rewrite was put such a rare condition. For together by Lisa Lovelidge and more information talk to your peer reviewed by Professor Claire haematologist or clinical nurse Harrison. This booklet has since specialist. been updated by our Patient Information Writer Isabelle Leach This booklet originally written and peer reviewed by Dr Sebastian by Professor Claire Harrison, Francis. We also appreciate Consultant Haematologist Norman Childs and Amy Cross for at Guy’s and St Thomas’ their input as patient reviewers NHS Foundation Trust, and as well as Samantha Robertson subsequently revised by Dr whose husband had MF. Steve Knapper, Consultant If you would like any information on the sources used for this booklet, please email [email protected] for a list of references. Version 4 Printed: 10/2020 2 www.leukaemiacare.org.uk Review date: 10/2022 In this booklet Introduction 2 In this booklet 3 About Leukaemia Care 4 What is myelofibrosis? 6 What are the signs and symptoms of MF? 9 How is MF diagnosed? 10 What is the treatment for MF? 12 Living with MF 26 Talking about MF 28 Glossary 31 Useful contacts and further support 39 Helpline freephone 08088 010 444 3 About Leukaemia Care Leukaemia Care is a national charity dedicated to ensuring that people affected by blood cancer have access to the right information, advice and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Massive Myelofibrosis with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Akut Masif Myelofibrozis Ve Akut Lenfoblastik Lösemi Birlikteliği
    204 Case Report Acute massive myelofibrosis with acute lymphoblastic leukemia Akut masif myelofibrozis ve akut lenfoblastik lösemi birlikteliği Zekai Avcı1, Barış Malbora1, Meltem Gülşan1, Feride Iffet Şahin2, Bülent Celasun3, Namık Özbek1 1Department of Pediatrics, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey 2Department of Medical Genetics, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey 3Department of Pathology, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey Abstract Acute myelofibrosis is characterized by pancytopenia of sudden onset, megakaryocytic hyperplasia, extensive bone mar- row fibrosis, and the absence of organomegaly. Acute myelofibrosis in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia is extremely rare. We report a 4-year-old boy who was diagnosed as having acute massive myelofibrosis and acute lym- phoblastic leukemia. Performing bone marrow aspiration in this patient was difficult (a “dry tap”), and the diagnosis was established by means of a bone marrow biopsy and immunohistopathologic analysis. The prognostic significance of acute myelofibrosis in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia is not clear. (Turk J Hematol 2009; 26: 204-6) Key words: Acute myelofibrosis, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, dry tap Received: April 9, 2008 Accepted: December 24, 2008 Özet Akut myelofibrozis ani gelişen pansitopeni, kemik iliğinde megakaryositik hiperplazi, belirgin fibrozis ve organomegali olmaması ile karakterize bir hastalıktır. Akut myelofibrozis ile akut lenfoblastik lösemi birlikteliği çok nadir görülmektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes Overview and Types
    cancer.org | 1.800.227.2345 About Myelodysplastic Syndromes Overview and Types If you have been diagnosed with a myelodysplastic syndrome or are worried about it, you likely have a lot of questions. Learning some basics is a good place to start. ● What Are Myelodysplastic Syndromes? ● Types of Myelodysplastic Syndromes Research and Statistics See the latest estimates for new cases of myelodysplastic syndromes in the US and what research is currently being done. ● Key Statistics for Myelodysplastic Syndromes ● What's New in Myelodysplastic Syndrome Research? What Are Myelodysplastic Syndromes? Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are conditions that can occur when the blood- forming cells in the bone marrow become abnormal. This leads to low numbers of one or more types of blood cells. MDS is considered a type of cancer1. Normal bone marrow 1 ____________________________________________________________________________________American Cancer Society cancer.org | 1.800.227.2345 Bone marrow is found in the middle of certain bones. It is made up of blood-forming cells, fat cells, and supporting tissues. A small fraction of the blood-forming cells are blood stem cells. Stem cells are needed to make new blood cells. There are 3 main types of blood cells: red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets. Red blood cells pick up oxygen in the lungs and carry it to the rest of the body. These cells also bring carbon dioxide back to the lungs. Having too few red blood cells is called anemia. It can make a person feel tired and weak and look pale. Severe anemia can cause shortness of breath. White blood cells (also known as leukocytes) are important in defending the body against infection.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptile Clinical Pathology Vickie Joseph, DVM, DABVP (Avian)
    Reptile Clinical Pathology Vickie Joseph, DVM, DABVP (Avian) Session #121 Affiliation: From the Bird & Pet Clinic of Roseville, 3985 Foothills Blvd. Roseville, CA 95747, USA and IDEXX Laboratories, 2825 KOVR Drive, West Sacramento, CA 95605, USA. Abstract: Hematology and chemistry values of the reptile may be influenced by extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Proper processing of the blood sample is imperative to preserve cell morphology and limit sample artifacts. Identifying the abnormal changes in the hemogram and biochemistries associated with anemia, hemoparasites, septicemias and neoplastic disorders will aid in the prognostic and therapeutic decisions. Introduction Evaluating the reptile hemogram is challenging. Extrinsic factors (season, temperature, habitat, diet, disease, stress, venipuncture site) and intrinsic factors (species, gender, age, physiologic status) will affect the hemogram numbers, distribution of the leukocytes and the reptile’s response to disease. Certain procedures should be ad- hered to when drawing and processing the blood sample to preserve cell morphology and limit sample artifact. The goal of this paper is to briefly review reptile red blood cell and white blood cell identification, normal cell morphology and terminology. A detailed explanation of abnormal changes seen in the hemogram and biochem- istries in response to anemia, hemoparasites, septicemias and neoplasia will be addressed. Hematology and Chemistries Blood collection and preparation Although it is not the scope of this paper to address sites of blood collection and sample preparation, a few im- portant points need to be explained. For best results to preserve cell morphology and decrease sample artifacts, hematologic testing should be performed as soon as possible following blood collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Profiling of Myeloid Progenitor Cells in Multi-Mutated Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis Identifies KIT D816V As a Distin
    Leukemia (2015) 29, 1115–1122 © 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0887-6924/15 www.nature.com/leu ORIGINAL ARTICLE Molecular profiling of myeloid progenitor cells in multi-mutated advanced systemic mastocytosis identifies KIT D816V as a distinct and late event M Jawhar1,8, J Schwaab1,8, S Schnittger2, K Sotlar3, H-P Horny3, G Metzgeroth1, N Müller1, S Schneider4, N Naumann1, C Walz3, T Haferlach2, P Valent5, W-K Hofmann1, NCP Cross6,7, A Fabarius1 and A Reiter1 To explore the molecular profile and its prognostic implication in systemic mastocytosis (SM), we analyzed the mutation status of granulocyte–macrophage colony-forming progenitor cells (CFU-GM) in patients with KIT D816V+ indolent SM (ISM, n = 4), smoldering SM (SSM, n = 2), aggressive SM (ASM, n = 1), SM with associated clonal hematologic non-mast cell lineage disorder (SM-AHNMD, n = 5) and ASM-AHNMD (n = 7). All patients with (A)SM-AHNMD (n = 12) carried 1–4 (median 3) additional mutations in 11 genes tested, most frequently TET2, SRSF2, ASXL1, CBL and EZH2. In multi-mutated (A)SM-AHNMD, KIT D816V+ single-cell-derived CFU-GM colonies were identified in 8/12 patients (median 60%, range 0–95). Additional mutations were identified in CFU-GM colonies in all patients, and logical hierarchy analysis indicated that mutations in TET2, SRSF2 and ASXL1 preceded KIT D816V. In ISM/SSM, no additional mutations were detected and CFU-GM colonies were exclusively KIT D816V−. These data indicate that (a) (A)SM-AHNMD is a multi-mutated neoplasm, (b) mutations in TET2, SRSF2 or ASXL1 precede KIT D816V in ASM-AHNMD, (c) KIT D816V is thus a phenotype modifier toward SM and (d) KIT D816V or other mutations are rare in CFU-GM colonies of ISM/SSM patients, which might explain at least in part their better prognosis.
    [Show full text]
  • BHS Leucocytosis and Leucopenia Dr Caers
    Leucocytoses & leucopenia Jo Caers Dept of Clinical Hematology [email protected] Bone marrow Blood Granulopoiesis Proliferation & 5 days maturation Storage 1 day Marginisation& Circulation 1 day Tissues 1-2 days Granulopoiesis Proliferation & 5 days maturation Storage 1 day Marginisation& Circulation 1 day Tissues 1-2 days Granulopoiesis Proliferation & 5 days maturation Storage 1 day Marginisation& Circulation 1 day Tissues 1-2 days Lymphocytes Monocytes NORMAL BLOOD CELL COUNT Hemoglobin 12.0 – 15.0 g/dl (F) 13.0 – 17.0 g/dl (M) Red Blood Cells 3.9 – 5.6 x 10 6/µl (F) 4.5 – 6.5 x 10 6/µl (M) Hematocrit 36 – 48% (F) 40 – 52% (M) Mean Corpuscular Volume 80 – 95µ³ Mean Hb Concentration 27 – 34 pg Conc corp mean Hb 30 – 35 g/dl Reticulocytes 0.5 – 20 % Leucocytes 4.0 – 10.0 x 10 3/µl ¨ Neutophils 1.8 – 7.5 Lymphocytes 1.5 – 3.5 Monocytes 0.2 – 0.8 Eosinophils 0.04 – 0.45 Basophils 0.01 – 0.1 Platelets 100 – 400 x 10 3/dl Hyperleucocytosis > 10.000 WBC/mm³ Normal Cells Abnormal cells or blastic cells Infections ? Neutrophilia (> 7.500/mm³) Acute Leukemias Lymphocytosis (> 4.500/mm³) Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemias Chronic Lymhocytic leukemia Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Non Hodgkin Lymphoma Chronic Monocytosis (> 800/mm³) … Inflammations? Eosinophilia (> 400/mm³) Basophilia (> 100/mm³) Leukoerythroblastic reaction Cytopenia with immature RBCs (normoblasts) immature WBCs (agranular neutrophils, myelocytes, metamyelocytes ) Causes BM infiltration • Solid tumor or hematological malignancy • Myelofibrosis Strong BM stimulation • Infection,
    [Show full text]