DOCSLIB.ORG

IN the SUPREME COURT of FLORIDA CASE NO. SC09-568 BOBBY RALEIGH, Appellant, V. STATE of FLORIDA, Appellee. on APPEAL from the CI

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IN the SUPREME COURT of FLORIDA CASE NO. SC09-568 BOBBY RALEIGH, Appellant, V. STATE of FLORIDA, Appellee. on APPEAL from the CI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC09-568 BOBBY RALEIGH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT MARTIN J. MCCLAIN Florida Bar No. 0754773 McClain & McDermott, P.A. Attorneys at Law 141 NE 30th Street Wilton Manors, FL 33334 (305) 984-8344 COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Citations in this brief to designate references to the records, followed by the appropriate page number, are as follows: AT. ___@ - Record on appeal to this Court in the 1981 direct appeal; APC-T. ___@ - Record on appeal to this Court from initial Rule 3.851 from the denial of post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing; APC-R2. ___@ - Record on appeal to this Court in the curret appeal from the summary denial of post-conviction relief; All other citations will be self-explanatory or will otherwise be explained. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ........................................ i TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................... ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........................................ iv STATEMENT OF THE CASE ........................................ 1 A. Procedural History ................................. 1 B. Relevant Facts ..................................... 8 STANDARD OF REVIEW .......................................... 15 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ......................................... 16 ARGUMENT I MR. RALEIGH=S SENTENCE OF DEATH VIOLATES THE EIGHTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS BECAUSE IT IS THE RESULT OF A PROCESS THAT PERMITTED AN ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS IMPOSITION OF A SENTENCE OF DEATH ...................... 17 A. Introduction ...................................... 17 B. The ABA Report .................................... 24 C. Florida - An Arbitrary and Capricious Death Penalty System ............................................ 25 1. The number of executions ..................... 25 2. The exonerated ............................... 26 a. The arbitrariness in the treatment of evidence of actual innocence ......... 28 b. DNA ..................................... 31 3. Representation ............................... 32 ii a. Trial level representation .............. 32 4. Issues related to the jury=s role in sentencing ................................... 34 a. Jury instructions ....................... 34 b. Unanimity ............................... 35 c. Judicial overrides ...................... 36 5. Racial and Geographic Disparities ............ 39 a. Racial disparities ................. 39 b. Geographic disparities ............. 40 6. Prosecutorial Misconduct ..................... 40 7. The Direct Appeal Process ................... 44 8. Retroactivity ............................... 45 9. Procedural Default ........................... 47 10. Clemency ..................................... 48 D. CONCLUSION ........................................ 49 ARGUMENT II IT WAS ERROR TO SUMMARILY DENY APPELLANT=S CHALLENGE TO FLORIDA=S PROCEDURES FOR CARRYING OUT A LETHAL INJECTION EXECUTION AS VIOLATIVE OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ............ 49 CONCLUSION .................................................. 62 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ...................................... 63 CERTIFICATE OF FONT ......................................... 64 iii iv v TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page Agan v. Singletary, 12 F.3d 1012 (11th Cir. 1993)............................ 41 Arango v. State, 497 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 1986)............................. 41 Baze v. Rees, 128 S. Ct. 1520 (2008).............................. 54, 55 Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78 (1935)...................................... 42 Callins v. Collins, 510 U.S. 1141 (1994).................................... 22 Cardona v. State, 826 So. 2d 968 (Fla. 2002).............................. 40 Cheshire v. State, 568 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 1990).............................. 36 Cleveland Bd. Of Ed. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 (1985)..................................... 55 Cochran v. State, 547 So. 2d 928 (Fla. 1989).............................. 38 Combs v. State, 525 So. 2d 853 (Fla. 1988).............................. 37 Duest v. Dugger, 555 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 1990).............................. 41 Floyd v. State, 902 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 2005).............................. 40 Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986)..................................... 56 Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972)................................. passim vi Garcia v. State, 622 So. 2d 1325 (Fla. 1993)............................. 41 Gaskin v. State, 737 So. 2d 509 (Fla. 1999).............................. 15 Godfrey v. Georgia, 446 U.S. 420 (1980)..................................... 21 Gorham v. State, 597 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 1992).............................. 41 Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976)................................. 19, 20 Guzman v. State, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 1398 (Fla. June 29, 2006)............... 41 Harbison v. Bell 129 S. Ct. 1481 (2009) ................................. 48 Herrera v. Collins, 506 U.S. 390 (1993)..................................... 48 Hoffman v. State, 800 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 2001).............................. 41 House v. Bell, 126 S. Ct. 2064 (2006).................................. 30 Jones v. State, 709 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 1998)...................... 29, 31, 48 Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 262 (1976)..................................... 21 Kansas v. Marsh, 126 S. Ct. 2516 (2006).............................. 24, 26 Lightbourne v. Dugger, 549 So. 2d 1364 (Fla. 1989)............................. 15 Lightbourne v. McCollum, vii 969 So. 2d 326 (Fla. 2007).......................... passim Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978)..................................... 21 Maynard v. Cartwright, 486 U.S. 356 (1988)..................................... 21 Mordenti v. State, 894 So. 2d 161 (Fla. 2004).............................. 40 Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306 (1950).................................... 55 Parker v. Dugger, 498 So. 2d 308 (1991)............................... 38, 45 Peede v. State, 748 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 1999).............................. 15 Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989)..................................... 21 Proffitt v. Florida, 428 U.S. 242 (1976)............................. 19, 20, 49 Raleigh v. State 705 So. 2d 1324 (Fla. 1997)........................ 1, 2, 3 Raleigh v. State 932 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2006) ............................. 4 Rogers v. State, 782 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 2001).............................. 41 Roman v. State, 528 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 1988)............................. 41 Rompilla v. Beard, 545 U.S. 374 (2005)......................... 33, 45, 46, 47 Rutherford v. State 940 So. 2d 1112, 1117 (Fla. 2006) .................. 17, 49 viii Schwab v. State, 969 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 2007)...............50, 51, 52, 53, 62 Smith v. State, 931 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 2006).............................. 41 Smith v. Wainwright, 799 F.3d 1442 (11th Cir. 1986) ......................... 41 Spaziano v. Florida, 468 U.S. 447 (1984)..................................... 35 State v. Gunsby, 670 So. 2d 920 (Fla. 1996).............................. 41 State v. Huggins, 788 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 2001).............................. 41 State v. Steele, 921 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 2005).............................. 35 Stephens v. State, 748 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 1999)............................. 33 Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)......................... 32, 33, 46, 47 Swafford v. State, 828 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 2002)...................... 28, 31, 48 Tedder v. State, 322 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 1975).............................. 37 Teffeteller v. Dugger, 676 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 1996).......................... 56, 57 Ventura v. State, 794 So. 2d 553 (Fla. 2001).............................. 41 Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639 (1990)..................................... 22 Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003)......................... 33, 45, 46, 47 ix Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362 (2000)......................... 33, 45, 46, 47 Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 (1976)..................................... 21 Young v. State, 739 So. 2d 553 (Fla. 1991).............................. 41 x xi xii xiii STATEMENT OF THE CASE A. Procedural History Mr. Raleigh and his co-defendant, Domingo Figueroa, were charged by indictment in the Circuit Court of the Seventh Judicial Circuit, Volusia County, Florida, with two counts of first degree murder, one count of burglary, and one count of shooting into a building. Mr. Raleigh pled guilty on June 6, 1995. Thereafter, a jury was selected for a penalty phase proceeding. The jury, by a vote of 12-0, recommended a sentence of death on August 15, 1995. On February 16, 1996, the trial judge sentenced Mr. Raleigh to death. In his sentencing order, the trial judge found the following aggravating circumstances: (1) prior violent felony (applied to both Cox and Eberlin); (2) that the murders were committed while engaged in a burglary (applied to the murders of both Cox and Eberlin); (3) that the murder of Cox was cold, calculated, and premeditated (CCP); (4) that the murder of Eberlin was committed to avoid arrest or effect escape; and (5) that the murder of Eberlin was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel (HAC). Raleigh, 705 So. 2d at 1327 n.1. The trial court found one statutory and fifteen nonstatutory mitigators. The statutory mitigator is Raleigh's age--he was nineteen at the time of the crime. Id. at 1327 n.2. The nonstatutory mitigators
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How and Why Illinois Abolished the Death Penalty
    Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality Volume 30 Issue 2 Article 2 December 2012 How and Why Illinois Abolished the Death Penalty Rob Warden Follow this and additional works at: https://lawandinequality.org/ Recommended Citation Rob Warden, How and Why Illinois Abolished the Death Penalty, 30(2) LAW & INEQ. 245 (2012). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/lawineq/vol30/iss2/2 Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. 245 How and Why Illinois Abolished the Death Penalty Rob Wardent Introduction The late J. Paul Getty had a formula for becoming wealthy: rise early, work late-and strike oil.' That is also the formula for abolishing the death penalty, or at least it is a formula-the one that worked in Illinois. When Governor Pat Quinn signed legislation ending capital punishment in Illinois on March 9, 2011, he tacitly acknowledged the early rising and late working that preceded the occasion. "Since our experience has shown that there is no way to design a perfect death penalty system, free from the numerous flaws that can lead to wrongful convictions or discriminatory treatment, I have concluded that the proper course of action is to abolish it." 2 The experience to which the governor referred was not something that dropped like a gentle rain from heaven upon the place beneath and seeped into his consciousness by osmosis. Rather, a cadre of public defenders, pro bono lawyers, journalists, academics, and assorted activists, devoted tens of thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands, of hours, over more than three decades, to the abolition movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of Bite Mark Exonerations
    DESCRIPTION OF BITE MARK EXONERATIONS 1. Keith Allen Harward: Keith Harward was convicted of the September 1982 murder of a man and the rape of his wife. The assailant, who was dressed as a sailor, bit the rape victim’s legs multiple times during the commission of the rape. Because of the assailant’s uniform, the investigation focused on the sailors aboard a Navy ship dry-docked near the victims’ Newport News, Virginia, home. Dentists aboard the ship ran visual screens of the dental records and teeth of between 1,000 and 3,000 officers aboard the ship; though Harward’s dentition was initially highlighted for additional screening, a forensic dentist later excluded Harward as the source of the bites. The crime went unsolved for six months, until detectives were notified that Harward was accused of biting his then-girlfriend in a dispute. The Commonwealth then re-submitted wax impressions and dental molds of Harward's dentition to two ABFO board-certified Diplomates, Drs. Lowell Levine and Alvin Kagey, who both concluded that Harward was the source of bite marks on the rape victim. Although the naval and local dentists who conducted the initial screenings had excluded Harward as the source of the bites, in the wake of the ABFO Diplomates’ identifications they both changed their opinions. Harward’s defense attorneys also sought opinions from two additional forensic dentists prior to his trials, but those experts also concluded that Harward inflicted the bites; in total, six forensic dentists falsely identified Harward as the biter. At Harward's second trial, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Wrongful Convictions After a Century of Research Jon B
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Northwestern University Illinois, School of Law: Scholarly Commons Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 100 Article 7 Issue 3 Summer Summer 2010 One Hundred Years Later: Wrongful Convictions after a Century of Research Jon B. Gould Richard A. Leo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Jon B. Gould, Richard A. Leo, One Hundred Years Later: Wrongful Convictions after a Century of Research, 100 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 825 (2010) This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/10/10003-0825 THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 100, No. 3 Copyright © 2010 by Jon B. Gould & Richard A. Leo Printed in U.S.A. II. “JUSTICE” IN ACTION ONE HUNDRED YEARS LATER: WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS AFTER A CENTURY OF RESEARCH JON B. GOULD* & RICHARD A. LEO** In this Article, the authors analyze a century of research on the causes and consequences of wrongful convictions in the American criminal justice system while explaining the many lessons of this body of work. This Article chronicles the range of research that has been conducted on wrongful convictions; examines the common sources of error in the criminal justice system and their effects; suggests where additional research and attention are needed; and discusses methodological strategies for improving the quality of research on wrongful convictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Victim Experiences of Wrongful Conviction
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Study of Victim Experiences of Wrongful Conviction Author(s): Seri Irazola, Ph.D., Erin Williamson, Julie Stricker, Emily Niedzwiecki Document No.: 244084 Date Received: November 2013 Award Number: GS-23F-8182H This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant report available electronically. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Final Report Study of Victim Experiences of Wrongful Conviction Contract No. GS-23F-8182H September, 2013 Submitted to: National Institute of Justice Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Submitted by: ICF Incorporated 9300 Lee Highway Fairfax, VA 22031 Final Report Study of Victim Experiences of Wrongful Conviction Contract No. GS-23F-8182H September, 2013 Submitted to: National Institute of Justice Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Submitted by: ICF Incorporated 9300 Lee Highway Fairfax, VA 22031 Study of Victim Experiences of Wrongful Conviction Study of Victim Experiences of Wrongful Conviction Seri Irazola, Ph.D. Erin Williamson Julie Stricker Emily Niedzwiecki ICF International 9300 Lee Highway Fairfax, VA 22031-1207 This project was supported by Contract No. GS-23F-8182H, awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • How and Why Illinois Abolished the Death Penalty
    MINNESOTA JOURNAL OF LAW & INEQUALITY A Journal of Theory and Practice Summer 2012 How and Why Illinois Abolished the Death Penalty Copyright (c) 2012 Law & Inequality For footnotes, see published version: 30 Law & Ineq. 245 Rob Warden Executive Director, Center on Wrongful Convictions Bluhm Legal Clinic, Northwestern University School of Law Introduction The late J. Paul Getty had a formula for becoming wealthy: rise early, work late—and strike oil. That is also the formula for abolishing the death penalty, or at least it is a formula—the one that worked in Illinois. When Governor Pat Quinn signed legislation ending capital punishment in Illinois on March 9, 2011, he tacitly acknowledged the early rising and late working that preceded the occasion. “Since our experience has shown that there is no way to design a perfect death penalty system, free from the numerous flaws that can lead to wrongful convictions or discriminatory treatment, I have concluded that the proper course of action is to abolish it.” The experience to which the governor referred was not something that dropped like a gentle rain from heaven upon the place beneath and seeped into his consciousness by osmosis. Rather, a cadre of public defenders, pro bono lawyers, journalists, academics, and assorted activists, devoted tens of thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands, of hours, over more than three decades, to the abolition movement. All of the work would have been for naught, however, without huge measures of serendipity— the figurative equivalent of striking oil. The gusher, as I call it, was a long time coming. The prospecting began in 1976—a year before the Illinois death penalty was restored after the temporary hiatus ordered by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Newspaper Coverage of Exonerations from Death Row By
    Southern Newspaper Coverage of Exonerations from Death Row by David Niven Florida Atlantic University ABSTRACT How do newspapers in the south react when a death row inmate is exonerated? Examining newspaper coverage since 1990 of the 16 inmates released from the death rows of Florida, Georgia, and Texas reveals that (a) exonerated inmates receive less coverage than those who are executed, (b) coverage is apt to portray the exoneration as the result of an isolated mistake and not indicative of systematic failure, and (c) coverage emphasizes the experiences of former inmates after being released, not during their incarceration. Cumulatively, this pattern serves to minimize the seriousness of the innocent on death row situation, and is consistent with media theories suggesting political coverage is generally supportive of moderatism/mainstream elite political thinking. Normally, it is not front page news when someone visits a mall. "I don't even know what I'm looking for," the shopper admitted as he read the list of stores on the directory. But the Associated Press and other newspaper reporters were on the scene when Rudolph Holton went shopping for the first time in sixteen years (Hallifax, 2003a). Holton had spent the interim on Florida's death row. Then, on January 24, 2003, he was released, the 25th person wrongly convicted and sentenced to death by the state of Florida. In Holton's case, prosecutors had withheld evidence, a DNA test had been falsified, and the jailhouse snitches who testified against him later admitted they were lying. As he left the Tallahassee-area mall, Rudolph Holton tossed a few pennies in a fountain.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Pass Award Winners
    PREVENTION FOR A SAFER SOCIETY MAGAZINE “I Am Not a Juvenile Delinquent” Sharon Charde 2004 Touchstone Creative Writers The Beat Within PASS AWARD “The System” David Inocencio NEWSPAPER WINNERS Sandy Close Donna Hunter Michael Kroll San Jose Mercury-News Allan Martinez “Where Hope is Locked Away” Matt Melamed Karen de Sá FILM Arlene Mitri Brandon Bailey Manen Pau Griff Palmer Eric Strenger Elisabeth Rubinfien Big Mouth Productions John Hubner “Deadline” Los Angeles Times Magazine Richard Koci Hernandez Katy Chevigny Judith Calson Kirsten Johnson “The Cruelest Prison” Vince Beiser Dallas Brennan San Francisco Chronicle Angela Tucker Dan Winters Oscar Garza “A Car Chase Ends in a Life Kate Hirson Sentence” Carol Dysinger Colors NW Magazine Louis Freedberg Books Not Bars “Until the End of Their Days” Silja J.A. Talvi Boston Globe “System Failure” “A Mother, Her Sons, and a Lenore Anderson Inye Wokoma Naomi Ishisaka Choice” Gillian Caldwell Patricia Wen Paul Falzone Suzanne Kreiter David Riley The New York Times Magazine Ian Kim “A Death in the Box” Mary Beth Pfeiffer St. Louis Post-Dispatch Vera Titunik “Juvenile Justice in Missouri Serves Chance Films, Inc. as Model for Nation” “Juvies” Matthew Franck Leslie Neal LITERATURE Andy Cutraro Traci Odom Mark Wahlberg “Life on the Outside” New York Times John Densmore Jennifer Gonnerman “How the Justice System Christopher Komives Criminalizes Mental Illness” Nicholas Hay “Total Confinement: Madness and Brent Staples Paul Westmacott Reason in the Maximum Security Prison” Poughkeepsie Journal Critical
    [Show full text]
  • Compensation Statutes and Post-Exoneration Offending Evan J
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 103 | Issue 2 Article 4 Spring 2013 Compensation Statutes and Post-exoneration Offending Evan J. Mandery Amy Shlosberg Valerie West Bennett alC laghan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation Evan J. Mandery, Amy Shlosberg, Valerie West, and Bennett alC laghan, Compensation Statutes and Post-exoneration Offending, 103 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 553 (2013). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol103/iss2/4 This Criminology is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/13/10302-0553 THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 103, No. 2 Copyright © 2013 by Northwestern University School of Law Printed in U.S.A. CRIMINOLOGY COMPENSATION STATUTES AND POST- EXONERATION OFFENDING EVAN J. MANDERY* AMY SHLOSBERG** VALERIE WEST*** BENNETT CALLAGHAN **** Utilizing a data set of exonerees compiled from the Center on Wrongful Convictions at Northwestern University, this study tracks the behavior of 118 exonerees following their releases and examines the effects of more than twenty variables on the exonerees’ post-release criminality. We present here our findings on the effect of victim-compensation statutes on post-exoneration offending. When treated as a dichotomous variable, compensation has no apparent effect. When treated as a continuous variable, however, a pattern emerges. Exonerees who are compensated above a threshold amount of $500,000 commit offenses at a significantly lower rate than those who are either not compensated or compensated beneath the threshold.
    [Show full text]
  • The Innocence Checklist
    THE INNOCENCE CHECKLIST Carrie Leonetti* ABSTRACT Because true innocence is unknowable, scholars who study wrongful convic- tions and advocates who seek to vindicate the innocent must use proxies for inno- cence. Court processes or of®cial recognition of innocence are the primary proxy for innocence in research databases of exonerees. This Article offers an innova- tive alternative to this process-based proxy: a substantive checklist of factors that indicates a likely wrongful conviction, derived from empirical and jurispru- dential sources. Notably, this checklist does not rely on of®cial recognition of innocence for its objectivity or validity. Instead the checklist aggregates myriad indicators of innocence: factors known to contribute to wrongful convictions; rules of professional conduct; innocence-project intake criteria; prosecutorial conviction-integrity standards; and jurisprudence governing when convictions must be overturned because of fresh evidence or constitutional violations. A checklist based on articulated, uniformly applicable criteria is preferable to the more subjective and less regulated decisionmaking of judges and prosecutors who determine innocence using an of®cial exoneration methodology. Only a con- ception of innocence independent of of®cial exoneration can provide the neces- sary support for reform of barriers to more fruitful postconviction review mechanisms. INTRODUCTION ............................................ 99 I. BACKGROUND: THE INNOCENCE MOVEMENT .................... 100 A. Known Causes of Wrongful
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Death Penalty Reform: How It Happened, What It Promises Rob Warden
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 95 Article 2 Issue 2 Winter Winter 2005 Illinois Death Penalty Reform: How It Happened, What It Promises Rob Warden Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Rob Warden, Illinois Death Penalty Reform: How It Happened, What It Promises, 95 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 381 (2004-2005) This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/05/9502-0381 THE JOURNALOF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 95,No. 2 Copyright 0 2005 by Northwestern University, School of Law Printed inU.S.A. ILLINOIS DEATH PENALTY REFORM: HOW IT HAPPENED, WHAT IT PROMISES ROB WARDEN* In January of 2003, three years after Governor George H. Ryan declared a moratorium on executions and ten months after he exercised his clemency and pardon power to empty the nation's eighth largest death row,1 the Illinois General Assembly completed what the Chicago Tribune called an "historic reform of death penalty procedures in a state embarrassed by its penchant for choosing the wrong people to die."2 Indeed, of 289 defendants sentenced to death in Illinois after Furman v. Georgia,3 seventeen had been exonerated and released-an error rate of 5.9%. An eighteenth former death row prisoner, Gordon Randy Steidl, would be exonerated in May of 2004, pushing the error rate above six percent.4 Mistakes in the determination of guilt, however, were only part of the story of the Illinois post-Furman experience with capital punishment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Living Word Project
    THE LIVING WORD PROJECT FRI—SAT NOV 18—19 8PM SUN NOV 20 5PM YBCA THEATER YBCA.ORG #PEHLOTAH Produced by: When Marc Bamuthi Joseph first told me about THE LESLIE AND MERLE RABINE 2016–17 PERFORMANCE SEASON A NOTE /peh-LO-tah/, he didn’t start by describing a multidisciplinary performance project. Instead, FROM THE he described the moments in his own life EXECUTIVE when he feels free – weightless, without race, incredibly alive. He talked about feeling this DIRECTOR freedom when dancing and also right at the moment that his own body, positioned just perfectly, slices the soccer ball past the goalie and lands it squarely in the net. The feeling of freedom . Bamuthi’s work – from Youth Speaks and the Living Word Project to his organizational home at Yerba Buena Center for the Arts – has certainly been about creating these moments not just for himself but also for all of us. No matter which role he is playing – educator, curator, poet, or performer - he is building an ecosystem and he is “freeing” us to ask the questions, turn over the stones, confront the demons, imagine the possibilities. /peh-LO-tah/ centers on the question what does freedom feel like? At the same time, YBCA – through the YBCA Fellows program – is asking the related question can we design freedom? This is not convenient or coincidental rather it Photo by Jon Lowenstein is an intentional effort to bring creative people of all kinds together in pursuit of interrogation that will lead to cultural shift. /peh-LO-tah/ At the time of this writing, we don’t know who A FUTBOL-FRAMED FREEDOM SUITE..
    [Show full text]
  • The Psychological Impact of Wrongful Conviction
    American University Criminal Law Brief Volume 5 Issue 2 Article 2 2010 “It Never, Ever Ends”: The Psychological Impact of Wrongful Conviction Leslie Scott Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/clb Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation Scott, Leslie. “It Never, Ever Ends”: The Psychological Impact of Wrongful Conviction " American University Criminal Law Brief 5, no. 2 (2010):10-22. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University Criminal Law Brief by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “It Never, Ever Ends”: The Psychological Impact of Wrongful Conviction by leslie scott After Exoneration Program” of nearly sixty exonerees found i. exoneree mentAl heAlth: that one-third of them were financially dependent on family and PersonAl AccoUnts friends upon release from prison.7 Most exonerees claim that employment is their most dire need upon re-entry to society.8 A o matter what happens to you, you are majority of exonerees are men who, hardened by prison, would constantly put under this eye of distrust rather find employment immediately than go into counseling.9 that you can never shake. I walked into a Exonerees have no legal right to get their former jobs back and supermarket in town, and a lady picked up “N when applying for new ones, must her child.
    [Show full text]