DOCSLIB.ORG

Open PDF 270KB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Open PDF 270KB Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee Oral evidence: Air quality: follow-up, HC 509 Tuesday 6 July 2021 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 6 July 2021. Watch the meeting Members present: Neil Parish (Chair); Ian Byrne; Geraint Davies; Rosie Duffield; Barry Gardiner; Dr Neil Hudson; Robbie Moore; Mrs Sheryll Murray; Julian Sturdy; Derek Thomas. Questions 1 - 75 Witnesses I: Rebecca Pow MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; Bill Parish, Head of Air Quality and Industrial Emissions, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (via video link). Examination of witnesses Witnesses: Rebecca Pow MP and Bill Parish. Q1 Chair: Welcome to the EFRA Select Committee. We are talking about air quality today. We have the Minister Rebecca Pow and Bill Parish with us. Would you like to introduce yourselves for the record, please? Rebecca Pow: I am Rebecca Pow and I am the Environment Minister at DEFRA. Bill Parish: Good afternoon. I am Bill Parish. I am deputy director for air quality and industrial emissions at DEFRA. Q2 Chair: As far as I am aware, we do not have to declare an interest, because I do not think we are related. You are very much welcome, Bill. Minister, why will you not commit to meeting the World Health Organization’s PM2.5 target of 10 micrograms by 2030? What is the hold- up? Rebecca Pow: I am very pleased to be speaking to your Committee again, following on from the previous hearing not very many months ago. I will give the same answer I probably gave then. Whilst obviously we take this extremely seriously and the PM2.5 is of the greatest concern for human health, as we have said all along, we have to get this target absolutely right. The figure that the WHO has stated is a guide. They fully understand the route that we are taking, because actually we are acting by their guidelines, which is to take all the evidence and advice and have a clear pathway and plan to setting our target. That is what we are doing. That is what we have absolutely committed to through the Environment Bill with the dates we have set. We have been taking evidence from a great many sources on how to actually set this target. We will be coming up with what our thinking is by September. A huge amount of modelling is going on. In fact, even more modelling and collating of data since we last spoke, which I can tell you a little about later, if you would like to know about that. Then we have to go right around Government to get the support of all the other departments on exactly what this target should be. Then we will consult, and we will be consulting in early 2022. Then we will actually set the target, and everyone will know what the target is, as we have said all along, by 31 October 2022. In fairness, we might find out that we want to set it lower than the WHO guidelines. We are completely open to what it might be. All of the experts will tell you the same story. I am sure you have had them before your Committee. I meet them; I met with a whole load of them last week. Q3 Chair: What I would say to you, Rebecca, is that you came before and said, “We might even set higher standards”, but the problem is we have all sorts of standards set and targets to go for net zero. We have talked about actually bringing forward the banning of diesel and petrol cars. Yet now, all of a sudden, we have to do a lot of talking to people before we can set any targets. Why is it so different with air quality than it is with many other aspects of environment? As I have said to you before, air quality is probably the one thing that really directly affects people’s day- to-day lives. That is why I am concerned. We could say, given the fact that you are not going to set it until October 2022, that there is a lack of urgency. Would it be unkind to say that to you? Rebecca Pow: That would be totally unkind. You are absolutely right that this affects everybody’s daily lives. Also, you say, “Why can we not just do it tomorrow? Other people are taking action”. It is because it is not as straightforward as, for example, just changing fuel in a car. It is very complicated. Whatever expert you speak to, they will tell you the same thing. Professor Alastair Lewis, who I believe you heard from in your last inquiry, is on our air quality expert group. He will tell you it is not just as straightforward as writing down a number on a line. We have to get this right. Also, you have named a lot of other things that will impact this: how we get to net zero, what we are doing with cars and how climate change can change. All of these things have to be factored in. In our modelling, there has been some really complicated modelling on all of these different inputs, to try to see if we can come up with the right target. DEFRA consulted on this back in July 2019 and, although it came up with saying that it was potentially technically feasible, we have to have the pathway to get there. That is what we were absolutely determined to be working on. I am going to take issue with you about the lack of urgency, because we have already introduced a great many things that will already be helpful to us. We have already introduced that ban on burning of coal and wet wood in households. We introduced that in May this year. That is since our last meeting. We have brought a whole raft of measures to show that we are working on it. Q4 Chair: Sorry, Minister; we will not go into wood, because we have a question about that later. It is just the principle, as far as I am concerned. I will throw your words back at you. Why is it we can set a target for net zero, albeit further away, but yet we cannot set a target for air quality? Is it actually simple to get to net zero and more complicated to deal with air quality? The two do not quite chime together and we are trying to work out why. I know you are telling me you are consulting, but surely we are consulting on net zero, are we not, and yet we have set a target for that? You then tempt us with the fact that you might set an even tighter target, and yet you have not consulted, so you cannot actually tell us that, can you? Where are we? Rebecca Pow: We did one consultation in 2019. We are working on the next one. As I have told you, we will be coming up with a target in September and we will be consulting again in early spring. The point is that we are taking dual action. We are setting a target for concentration and we are setting a population exposure target. Both of these things are extremely technical and extremely complicated. I would reiterate again that both of those expert teams, which are both independent—the air quality expert group and the Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollutants, which are filled with expert scientists and academics—support the pathway that we are taking. We have to take their advice. The net zero target is 2050, whereas we are actually looking at a date much closer to us than that. I would say we would be irresponsible if we did not take this clear pathway. I am very happy to bring Bill Parish in. We talk about this at great length. Even last week, I had Professor Alastair Lewis in, and Professor Frank Kelly on the medical side, and I have spoken to Professor Stephen Holgate. All of those experts agree with the steps that we are taking, because we have to be responsible. Q5 Chair: The World Health Organization says we should hit this particular target. Many other countries are doing it. Why is it so much more difficult for us? Rebecca Pow: I have to take slight issue again. I am not sure that many other countries are doing it. As far as I understand, I do not know of any other industrial country doing anything like what we are considering, and certainly not considering a population exposure target. What we are considering with the 10 micrograms per cubic metre is way lower than what the EU has set. We are leaders in this, which is why we are also determined that we have to get it right, because there are going to be some very difficult decisions for society to make when this target is set. We have to make sure that we have consulted widely so that we bring people with us, because there are going to be some very difficult decisions to make about, for example, whether you halve the number of vehicles used. There is a whole range of issues. Do you just stop all burning of barbeques and street markets and street food? All of these things will have to be considered. They are not easy by any manner of means. We are certainly not ducking out of any of it.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Daily Report Friday, 2 July 2021 CONTENTS
    Daily Report Friday, 2 July 2021 This report shows written answers and statements provided on 2 July 2021 and the information is correct at the time of publication (03:33 P.M., 02 July 2021). For the latest information on written questions and answers, ministerial corrections, and written statements, please visit: http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/ CONTENTS ANSWERS 4 Small Businesses: Enfield BUSINESS, ENERGY AND North 12 INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY 4 Small Businesses: Females 13 Boilers: Repairs and CABINET OFFICE 14 Maintenance 4 11 Downing Street: Repairs Bounce Back Loan Scheme 4 and Maintenance 14 Business: Newcastle upon Arts and Design: Employment 14 Tyne Central 5 World War II: Channel Islands 14 Electricity: Storage 5 DEFENCE 14 Employment: Environment Armed Forces: Coronavirus 14 Protection 6 AWE: Expenditure 15 EU Grants and Loans: East Ayrshire 7 LE TacCIS Programme 16 Future Fund 7 LE TacCIS Programme: Contracts 16 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 7 Military Aid: Coronavirus 17 Heating and Water Supply 8 DIGITAL, CULTURE, MEDIA AND Heating: Business Premises SPORT 18 and Housing 8 Broadband 18 Heating: Costs 9 Social Media 19 Hinkley Point B Power Station 9 Surveillance: EU Law 19 Hinkley Point C Power Station 11 EDUCATION 20 Local Enterprise Partnerships: Economic Growth 11 Arts and Design: Higher Education 20 Royal Mail: Delivery Services 11 Arts: GCSE 21 Shipping: China 11 Arts: Secondary Education 22 Small Businesses: Advisory Services 12 Coronavirus: Quarantine 23 Education: Disadvantaged 24 Integrated Security, Defence, Financial
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Interests of Members’ Secretaries and Research Assistants
    REGISTER OF INTERESTS OF MEMBERS’ SECRETARIES AND RESEARCH ASSISTANTS (As at 11 July 2018) INTRODUCTION Purpose and Form of the Register In accordance with Resolutions made by the House of Commons on 17 December 1985 and 28 June 1993, holders of photo-identity passes as Members’ secretaries or research assistants are in essence required to register: ‘Any occupation or employment for which you receive over £380 from the same source in the course of a calendar year, if that occupation or employment is in any way advantaged by the privileged access to Parliament afforded by your pass. Any gift (eg jewellery) or benefit (eg hospitality, services) that you receive, if the gift or benefit in any way relates to or arises from your work in Parliament and its value exceeds £380 in the course of a calendar year.’ In Section 1 of the Register entries are listed alphabetically according to the staff member’s surname. Section 2 contains exactly the same information but entries are instead listed according to the sponsoring Member’s name. Administration and Inspection of the Register The Register is compiled and maintained by the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. Anyone whose details are entered on the Register is required to notify that office of any change in their registrable interests within 28 days of such a change arising. An updated edition of the Register is published approximately every 6 weeks when the House is sitting. Changes to the rules governing the Register are determined by the Committee on Standards in the House of Commons, although where such changes are substantial they are put by the Committee to the House for approval before being implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • CAL 392 Response to Defra Re Aarhus 271120
    Rt. Hon. George Eustice MP Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs By email: [email protected] 27 November 2020 Dear Secretary of State The Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation and Decision Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (the Aarhus Convention) Clean Air in London’s response to Defra Consultation on the UK’s Implementation Report 2021 I am writing on behalf of Clean Air in London (CAL) in response to the DePartment for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs’ (Defra’s) consultation on the Aarhus National Implementation Report 2021 (the RePort) which closes today (the Consultation): https://consult.defra.gov.uk/eu/aarhus-national-imPlementation-rePort-2021/ CAL camPaigns to achieve, urgently and sustainably, full comPliance with World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines for air quality throughout London and elsewhere. CAL notes that the PurPose of the Convention1 is to contribute to the Protection of the right of every person of present and future generations to live in an environment adequate to his or her health and well-being. CAL believes to Protect this right and the rights of the child it is essential to achieve clean air – which means air free from Pollutants which cause damage to the health of Present and future generations and free from the gasses which would otherwise cause catastroPhic climate change. That has not been achieved. Earlier this year, a review by this government found air Pollution to be the biggest environmental threat to health in the UK2. A letter to The Times Published on 28 SePtember 2019 and signed by nearly 40 doctors and scientists called for new legislation to enshrine the human right to breathe clean air and a corresponding duty of the state and Public authorities to Provide and ensure healthy air and a healthy environment.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • View Future Day Orals PDF File 0.11 MB
    Published: Wednesday 21 October 2020 Questions for oral answer on a future day (Future Day Orals) Questions for oral answer on a future day as of Wednesday 21 October 2020. The order of these questions may be varied in the published call lists. [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. Questions for Answer on Thursday 22 October Oral Questions to the Secretary of State for Transport Steven Bonnar (Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill): What (a) financial and (b) other support he plans to provide to the transport sector in the next six months. (907924) Michael Fabricant (Lichfield): What plans he has to maintain tilting train services on the West Coast mainline after the completion of High Speed Two; and if he will make a statement. (907925) Afzal Khan (Manchester, Gorton): What steps he is taking to improve accessibility for disabled people using the rail network. (907926) Richard Fuller (North East Bedfordshire): What assessment he has made of the steps needed to increase walking and cycling rates. (907927) Dr Kieran Mullan (Crewe and Nantwich): What steps his Department is taking to support local communities in meeting the cost of upgrades to rail bridges to tackle congestion. (907928) Virginia Crosbie (Ynys Môn): What steps the Government is taking to ensure that maritime workers receive pay protection equal to other sectors. (907929) Sir Gary Streeter (South West Devon): What plans he has to dual the A303 from Stonehenge to Taunton. (907930) Paul Howell (Sedgefield): What steps his Department is taking to reduce the duration of covid-19 quarantine required after international travel.
    [Show full text]
  • CIUS Co-Signs Joint Letter by 57 Associations Across the UK and the EU, on Rules
    M. Michel Barnier UK Task Force Secretariat General European Commission (by email) 12 June 2020 Joint EU-UK food and drink industry letter on rules of origin to lead EU and UK trade negotiators We are writing on behalf of a group of food and drink trade associations from across Europe that have a strong shared interest in the successful outcome of future trade talks between the EU and the UK. Our industries produce, process and manufacture a diverse range of products that help ensure consumers and shoppers across Europe benefit from the highest quality and widest choice of food and drink anywhere in the world. The producers and manufacturers we represent would benefit from continued close alignment where that is possible, however we recognise circumstances will inevitably change because of the UK’s decision to leave the EU. An area of real concern that is shared by food and drink businesses on both sides is around the damaging impacts rules of origin could have for our highly integrated supply chains. Rules of origin are a critical component in trade agreements that are frequently overlooked in the wider discussion of international trade because of the focus on reducing tariffs. They are the terms and conditions businesses must meet to access preferential tariffs secured in a trade agreement. If these rules are not set at appropriate levels or designed with sufficient flexibility to reflect the varied needs of food and drink supply chains, our industry will be negatively impacted. Across Europe, food and drink are at the heart of daily life, essential to our security and a critical part of the economies of EU Member States and the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the House of Commons December 2019 Diane ABBOTT MP
    Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Labour Conservative Diane ABBOTT MP Adam AFRIYIE MP Hackney North and Stoke Windsor Newington Labour Conservative Debbie ABRAHAMS MP Imran AHMAD-KHAN Oldham East and MP Saddleworth Wakefield Conservative Conservative Nigel ADAMS MP Nickie AIKEN MP Selby and Ainsty Cities of London and Westminster Conservative Conservative Bim AFOLAMI MP Peter ALDOUS MP Hitchin and Harpenden Waveney A Labour Labour Rushanara ALI MP Mike AMESBURY MP Bethnal Green and Bow Weaver Vale Labour Conservative Tahir ALI MP Sir David AMESS MP Birmingham, Hall Green Southend West Conservative Labour Lucy ALLAN MP Fleur ANDERSON MP Telford Putney Labour Conservative Dr Rosena ALLIN-KHAN Lee ANDERSON MP MP Ashfield Tooting Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Conservative Conservative Stuart ANDERSON MP Edward ARGAR MP Wolverhampton South Charnwood West Conservative Labour Stuart ANDREW MP Jonathan ASHWORTH Pudsey MP Leicester South Conservative Conservative Caroline ANSELL MP Sarah ATHERTON MP Eastbourne Wrexham Labour Conservative Tonia ANTONIAZZI MP Victoria ATKINS MP Gower Louth and Horncastle B Conservative Conservative Gareth BACON MP Siobhan BAILLIE MP Orpington Stroud Conservative Conservative Richard BACON MP Duncan BAKER MP South Norfolk North Norfolk Conservative Conservative Kemi BADENOCH MP Steve BAKER MP Saffron Walden Wycombe Conservative Conservative Shaun BAILEY MP Harriett BALDWIN MP West Bromwich West West Worcestershire Members of the House of Commons December 2019 B Conservative Conservative
    [Show full text]
  • European Scrutiny Committee House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA Tel (020) 7219 3292 Email [email protected] Website
    European Scrutiny Committee House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA Tel (020) 7219 3292 Email [email protected] Website www.parliament.uk/escom From: Sir William Cash MP 26 May 2021 Victoria Prentis MP Parliamentary Under Secretary of State Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Seacole Building 2 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DF 9317/18: Proposal for a Regulation amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, and amending Council Regulations (EC) No 768/2005, (EC) No 1967/2006, (EC) No 1005/2008, and Regulation (EU) No 2016/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards fisheries control (39822) We considered your letter of 5 March 2021 on the revision to the EU’s fisheries control Regulation at our meeting of 26 May 2021. The content of your letter was disappointing, providing us with little information on the progress of discussions concerning this proposal and their potential implications for the UK. We are mindful that any changes introduced will apply to UK fishers in EU waters and the impact of that will, in turn, depend on the outcome of the UK’s own review. Whether consciously or not, it is likely that the EU’s review will impact on the UK’s review, if only because costs to the industry are likely to increase in line with the degree of divergence between the two regimes. As a third country, the UK is no longer part of internal EU discussions, but some information on those discussions is in the public domain and we also anticipate that UK officials in the UK’s Mission to the EU will be monitoring this negotiation to the extent that they are able from outside the institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen Kinnock MP Aberav
    Member Name Constituency Bespoke Postage Total Spend £ Spend £ £ (Incl. VAT) (Incl. VAT) Stephen Kinnock MP Aberavon 318.43 1,220.00 1,538.43 Kirsty Blackman MP Aberdeen North 328.11 6,405.00 6,733.11 Neil Gray MP Airdrie and Shotts 436.97 1,670.00 2,106.97 Leo Docherty MP Aldershot 348.25 3,214.50 3,562.75 Wendy Morton MP Aldridge-Brownhills 220.33 1,535.00 1,755.33 Sir Graham Brady MP Altrincham and Sale West 173.37 225.00 398.37 Mark Tami MP Alyn and Deeside 176.28 700.00 876.28 Nigel Mills MP Amber Valley 489.19 3,050.00 3,539.19 Hywel Williams MP Arfon 18.84 0.00 18.84 Brendan O'Hara MP Argyll and Bute 834.12 5,930.00 6,764.12 Damian Green MP Ashford 32.18 525.00 557.18 Angela Rayner MP Ashton-under-Lyne 82.38 152.50 234.88 Victoria Prentis MP Banbury 67.17 805.00 872.17 David Duguid MP Banff and Buchan 279.65 915.00 1,194.65 Dame Margaret Hodge MP Barking 251.79 1,677.50 1,929.29 Dan Jarvis MP Barnsley Central 542.31 7,102.50 7,644.81 Stephanie Peacock MP Barnsley East 132.14 1,900.00 2,032.14 John Baron MP Basildon and Billericay 130.03 0.00 130.03 Maria Miller MP Basingstoke 209.83 1,187.50 1,397.33 Wera Hobhouse MP Bath 113.57 976.00 1,089.57 Tracy Brabin MP Batley and Spen 262.72 3,050.00 3,312.72 Marsha De Cordova MP Battersea 763.95 7,850.00 8,613.95 Bob Stewart MP Beckenham 157.19 562.50 719.69 Mohammad Yasin MP Bedford 43.34 0.00 43.34 Gavin Robinson MP Belfast East 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paul Maskey MP Belfast West 0.00 0.00 0.00 Neil Coyle MP Bermondsey and Old Southwark 1,114.18 7,622.50 8,736.68 John Lamont MP Berwickshire Roxburgh
    [Show full text]
  • View Call Lists: Westminster Hall PDF File 0.05 MB
    Issued on: 27 April at 3.32pm Call lists for Westminster Hall Wednesday 28 April 2021 A list of Members, both virtually and physically present, selected to participate in 60- and 90-minute Westminster Hall debates. 30-minute debates do not have a call list. All Members wishing to speak in the debate must be present from the beginning of the debate. For 60-minute and 90-minute debates, only Members on the call list will be called to speak, and they will be called in the order they appear on the call list, subject to discretion of the Chair. Members who are not on the call list are not permitted to attend debates. For 30-minute debates, there will not be a call list. Members may attend to intervene or make a short speech. Members wishing to make a speech should follow existing conventions about contacting the Member in charge of the debate, the Speaker’s Office [email protected]( ) and the Minister. If sittings are suspended for divisions in the House, additional time is added. Call lists are compiled and published incrementally as information becomes available. For the most up-to-date information see the parliament website: https://commonsbusiness.parliament.uk/ CONTENTS 1. Proposed closure of GKN Automotive plant in Birmingham 1 2. Extending redundancy protection for women and new parents 2 3. British meat and dairy products 2 4. Protecting consumers from online scams 3 5. District heat networks 3 PROPOSED CLOSURE OF GKN AUTOMOTIVE PLANT IN BIRMINGHAM 9.25am to 10.55am Order Member Party Virtual/ Physical 1 Jack Dromey (Birmingham,
    [Show full text]
  • Public Relations and Economic Development Sub (Policy & Resources) Committee
    Public Document Pack Public Relations and Economic Development Sub (Policy & Resources) Committee Date: WEDNESDAY, 19 FEBRUARY 2020 Time: 3.00 pm Venue: COMMITTEE ROOM 3 - 2ND FLOOR WEST WING, GUILDHALL Members: Deputy Catherine McGuinness (Chair) Simon Duckworth (Deputy Chairman) Deputy Keith Bottomley Tijs Broeke Dominic Christian Karina Dostalova Anne Fairweather Alderman Prem Goyal Sheriff Christopher Hayward Deputy Jamie Ingham Clark Alderman Vincent Keaveny Deputy Edward Lord Andrew Mayer Jeremy Mayhew Deputy Tom Sleigh Sir Michael Snyder James Tumbridge Alderman Sir David Wootton Enquiries: Emma Cunnington [email protected] N.B. Part of this meeting could be the subject of audio or visual recording. John Barradell Town Clerk and Chief Executive AGENDA Part 1 - Public Agenda 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 2. MEMBERS' DECLARATIONS UNDER THE CODE OF CONDUCT IN RESPECT OF ITEMS ON THE AGENDA 3. MINUTES To agree the public minutes and summary of the meeting held on 3 December 2019. For Decision (Pages 1 - 6) 4. OUTSTANDING ACTIONS Report of the Town Clerk. For Information (Pages 7 - 8) 5. EPPING FOREST EVENTS TENDER REPUTATIONAL RISK Report of the Director of Open Spaces. NB:- To be read in conjunction with the non-public appendices at item 18. For Information (Pages 9 - 14) 6. CORPORATE AFFAIRS UPDATE Report of the Director of Communications. For Information (Pages 15 - 18) 7. PARTY CONFERENCES Report of the Director of Communications. For Information (Pages 19 - 22) 8. SPORT ENGAGEMENT Report of the Director of Communications. 8. a) Sport Engagement - Progress Update For Information (Pages 23 - 26) 8. b) Tokyo 2020 Games (Pages 27 - 30) For Decision (Pages 27 - 30) 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Minutes
    House of Commons Liaison Committee Formal Minutes Session 2019–21 Liaison Committee: Formal Minutes 2019–21 1 Formal Minutes of the Liaison Committee, Session 2019–21 1. THURSDAY 21 MAY 2020 Virtual meeting Members present: Sir Bernard Jenkin, in the Chair Hilary Benn Andrew Jones Mr Clive Betts Darren Jones Karen Bradley Julian Knight Chris Bryant Angus Brendan MacNeil Sir William Cash Sir Robert Neill Sarah Champion Caroline Nokes Greg Clark Neil Parish Stephen Crabb Mel Stride Tobias Ellwood Stephen Timms Lilian Greenwood Tom Tugendhat Robert Halfon Bill Wiggin Meg Hillier Pete Wishart Simon Hoare William Wragg Jeremy Hunt 1. Declarations of Interests Members declared their interests, in accordance with the Resolution of the House of 13 July 1992 (see Appendix). 2. Committee working practices and future programme Resolved, That Hilary Benn, Karen Bradley, Sarah Champion, Greg Clark and Pete Wishart be members of an informal Working Group to support the Chair with delegated duties and decision making between formal committee meetings. Resolved, That witnesses should be heard in public, unless the Committee otherwise ordered. Resolved, That witnesses who submit written evidence to the Committee are authorised to publish it on their own account in accordance with Standing Order No. 135, subject always to the discretion of the Chair or where the Committee otherwise orders. Resolved, That the Committee shall not normally examine individual cases. Resolved, That the Chair have discretion to: 2 Liaison Committee: Formal Minutes 2017–19 (a)
    [Show full text]