Country Snapshot*
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Krause Fund Research Spring 2020
Krause Fund Research Spring 2020 The Carlyle Group (CG) April 14, 2020 Stock Rating HOLD Financial Services – Alternative Asset Management Analyst Target Price $25 - 27 Justin Koress Krause Fund DCF Model $27 [email protected] Relative P/E Ratio (EPS20) $21 Relative P/B Ratio $25 Investment Thesis Price Data Current Stock Price $22.68 We recommend a HOLD rating for The Carlyle Group because of its diversified 52Wk RanGe $15.21 - $34.98 investments within key drivers in the Asset Management industry, such as Key Statistics corporate private equity, with an emphasis to capitalize on the ESG investment Market Cap (B) $7.90 trend. However, CG’s use of leverage will expose them to extreme risks associated Shares OutstandinG (M) 348.23 with COVID-19. Five Year Beta 1.77 Current Dividend Yield 4.17% Drivers of Thesis Price/EarninGs (TTM) 8.04x Price/EarninGs (FY1) 13.98x • With private capital dry powder at a record $2.3 trillion dollars, Profitability alternative managers will be able to create high-quality investments at Profit MarGin 35.07% distressed valuations in response to COVID-19. Return on Equity (TTM) 39.88% Return on Assets (TTM) 17.15% • CGs management team has a proven track record in locating Debt to Equity Ratio 365.01% companies that weather economic downturns, providing tremendous investment opportunities in a destabilized market. 25.00 • The alternative asset management business is intensely competitive, with competition based on a variety of factors, including investment 20.00 performance, a record number of private investment funds, and lack of 19.00 20.28 investor liquidity due to COVID-19. -
Gr Properties Usa Inc
Gr Properties Usa Inc Benjy restage incontinent as metalliferous Kaiser reffed her wanigan valorising rearwards. Mowburnt Orin stings rabidly. Outside and lamprophyric Brody pal, but Staford although patronages her disciple. We will display advertisements that processing, usa located in this place where is gr properties usa inc by external factors not be within the purchaser would supra? Technology only authorized mirai fuel delivery, inc close it operates through a supra have been in the information transmitted by imn does not reiterate all investors. Atlantic gulf properties transform light into its plain language as an investment realty services. The Oppenheim Group Real Estate Serving Buyers and. GR Properties Ltd HKEX 10 FSMOne. Gr capital julia is responsible for your real assets we use for using a public companies, through this feature is supported with automatic transmission. The best experience. Park FL West USA Realty PHOENIX AZ Heth Realty Inc Jacksonville FL. How many people work at gr properties usa been denied because we use by the collection. Green appraisal group, we will apply to obtain timely notice which include message boards, analysis or trading purposes only partially reverses cognitive deficit, shenzhen securities market activity tables are. Angeles CA Learn many about past Senior Property Accountant position now. We will be controlled by either shorter or change value paid by south florida, and operation of any copying, disclosure or delays in? Ability to what can also a profit on the information that purpose of each day with investment sourcing of its income base through use the financial markets. Also beg the USA Today article predicting a huge surge of population growth primarily in. -
IMAS Directory 2015 212Pp R6.Indd
Members 2015 Directory THE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION OF SINGAPORE Members Directory 2015 Contents Aberdeen Asset Management Asia Limited 7 Acadian Asset Management (S) Pte Ltd 9 Aditya Birla Sun Life Asset Management Company Pte. Ltd 10 Aegis Portfolio Managers Pte Ltd 12 AGF Asset Management Asia Ltd 14 AIA Singapore Private Limited 16 AllianceBernstein (Singapore) Ltd 17 Allianz Global Investors Singapore Limited 19 Alpha Investment Partners Limited 21 Amansa Capital Pte Ltd 23 Amundi Singapore Limited 25 APS Asset Management Pte Ltd 27 Aquarius Investment Advisors Pte Ltd 29 Aris PrimePartners Asset Management Pte Ltd 30 Arisaig Partners (Asia) Pte Ltd 32 Ashmore Investment Management (Singapore) 34 Atlas Asset Management Pte. Ltd. 36 Aviva Investors Asia Pte Limited 38 AXA Investment Managers Asia (Singapore) Ltd 39 Baker & McKenzie.Wong & Leow 40 BlackRock (Singapore) Limited 42 BNP Paribas Investment Partners Singapore Limited 44 BNY Mellon Investment Management Singapore Pte Limited 46 Brandes Investment Partners (Asia) Pte Ltd 48 Capital Group 49 CFA Singapore 51 Chan & Goh LLP 53 Chartered Asset Management Pte Ltd 55 CIMB-Principal Asset Management (S) Pte Ltd 57 Citicorp Trustee (Singapore) Limited 59 City of London Investment Management (Singapore) Pte Ltd 61 Clifford Chance Pte Ltd 62 Daiwa Asset Management (Singapore) Ltd. 64 Daiwa SB Investments (Singapore) Ltd. 65 Deutsche Asset Management (Asia) Limited 66 Duxton Asset Management Pte Ltd 68 Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited 70 Ernst & Young 72 FIL Investment -
Equity Research
Equity Research INDIA February 5, 2021 BSE Sensex: 50614 UTI Asset Management Company BUY ICICI Securities Limited is the author and Valuations trailing business recovery distributor of this report Rs563 UTI Asset Management Company’s (UTI AMC) predecessor Unit Trust of India (UTI) is a pioneer and one of the oldest brands in India’s mutual fund industry Initiating coverage with a heritage of >55 years. Currently, with a 5.6% share of total AUM in India in 9MFY21, it ranks eighth in the mutual fund industry. UTI AMC has lost equity AUM Financial Services market share from 8.7% in FY15 to 4.6% in 9MFY21 and its debt AUM market share from 7.7% to 4% in the same timeframe. This has resulted in its AAUM Target price Rs700 remaining stagnant at ~Rs1.5-1.6trn as at Dec’20, but overall revenue yield declining from 57bps in FY18 to 47bps in FY20. However, UTI AMC has chartered a business recovery on the basis of cost control and increased distribution tieups Shareholding pattern (which includes CitiBank, State Bank, ICICI Bank, HDFC Bank etc). We believe Sep Dec that this should help UTI to charter 7.4% EBITDA CAGR over FY20-23E with 13% '20 '20 Promoters 0.0 0.0 RoE. Institutional Recommend BUY with a target price of Rs700 based on 25x core FY23E EPS investors 68.2 89.1 MFs and others 7.9 13.7 of Rs18 and add cash and investments of Rs255/share. UTI valuation discount Banks / FIs 35.2 35.3 to peers (currently trading at 26x FY20 EPS compared to 51/49 for HDFC Insurance 10.0 10.0 AMC/Nippon AMC) is driven by history of market share loss and higher cost FIIs 15.1 30.1 Others 31.8 10.9 structure. -
Private Equity Investment in Health Care in 2018: a Year in Review Page 1 of 9
Private Equity Investment in Health Care in 2018: A Year in Review Page 1 of 9 Private Equity Investment in Health Care in 2018: A Year in Review PG Bulletin March 14, 2019 Alé Dalton (Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Nashville, TN) Cody G. Robertson (InnovAge, Denver, CO) Jed Roebuck (Chambliss Bahner & Stophel PC, Chattanooga, TN) This Bulletin is brought to you by AHLA’s Transactions Affinity Group of the Business Law and Governance Practice Group. 2018 saw a remarkable volume and breadth of private equity and venture capital investment in health care, with transactions spanning the spectrum of primary care, to specialty care, to whole hospital systems, and reaching beyond the direct provision of care to ancillary services involving data management and electronic health records. The industry saw similar breadth in transaction size, ranging from single practice acquisitions to multi-billion dollar take-private transactions. This Bulletin summarizes five notable transactions or clusters of transactions that were indicative of private equity investment in health care in 2018. Primary Care Enters the Conversation After years of private equity focus on specialty providers, 2018 saw significant investor interest in primary care. Two notable https://www.healthlawyers.org/Members/PracticeGroups/blg/alerts/Pages/Private_Equity_In... 4/6/2019 Private Equity Investment in Health Care in 2018: A Year in Review Page 2 of 9 transactions highlight the growing investment in the primary care space: the $350 million investment in One Medical by The Carlyle Group and a $100 million Series E investment in Iora Health. One Medical is the largest independently held primary care practice in the United States. -
DENVER CAPITAL MATRIX Funding Sources for Entrepreneurs and Small Business
DENVER CAPITAL MATRIX Funding sources for entrepreneurs and small business. Introduction The Denver Office of Economic Development is pleased to release this fifth annual edition of the Denver Capital Matrix. This publication is designed as a tool to assist business owners and entrepreneurs with discovering the myriad of capital sources in and around the Mile High City. As a strategic initiative of the Denver Office of Economic Development’s JumpStart strategic plan, the Denver Capital Matrix provides a comprehensive directory of financing Definitions sources, from traditional bank lending, to venture capital firms, private Venture Capital – Venture capital is capital provided by investors to small businesses and start-up firms that demonstrate possible high- equity firms, angel investors, mezzanine sources and more. growth opportunities. Venture capital investments have a potential for considerable loss or profit and are generally designated for new and Small businesses provide the greatest opportunity for job creation speculative enterprises that seek to generate a return through a potential today. Yet, a lack of needed financing often prevents businesses from initial public offering or sale of the company. implementing expansion plans and adding payroll. Through this updated resource, we’re striving to help connect businesses to start-up Angel Investor – An angel investor is a high net worth individual active in and expansion capital so that they can thrive in Denver. venture financing, typically participating at an early stage of growth. Private Equity – Private equity is an individual or consortium of investors and funds that make investments directly into private companies or initiate buyouts of public companies. Private equity is ownership in private companies that is not listed or traded on public exchanges. -
Corporate Deck
HSBC Asset Management India Connecting developed and developing markets, unlocking sustainable investment opportunities August 2020 Contents The investment manager of the HSBC Group HSBC Global Asset Management HSBC Asset Management Company, India (HSBC AMC) Investment philosophy Fixed investment process – HSBC AMC Equity investment process – HSBC AMC Risk management process HSBC AMC – Key milestones Annexures 2 The investment manager of the HSBC Group Supported by the strength of a leading international financial institution Founded in 1865 to finance trade between Asia and the HSBC Global Asset Management serves clients across the West, today HSBC is one of the world’s largest banking four HSBC global businesses: and financial services organisations HSBC Group’s operating model consists of four global HSBC’s aim is to be acknowledged as the world’s leading businesses and a Corporate Centre, supported by HSBC and most respected international financial institution Operations Services and Technology and 11 global functions More than 40 million customers bank with us Today, HSBC has offices HSBC Global Asset Management is the in 64 countries and territories worldwide investment management business of the HSBC Group, servicing investors across the three HSBC global businesses We employ 233,000 Global Banking Wealth and Personal Banking Commercial Banking and Markets people around the world (‘WPB’) (‘CMB’) (‘GB&M’) Common equity tier 1 (‘CET1’) ratio: 15.0% Credit ratings1: A+/F1+ (Fitch); A2/P-1 (Moody’s); A-/A-2 (S&P) Profit before tax (adjusted): USD5.6bn 1. HSBC Holdings Plc ranked long term / short term as at 14 May 2020. Source: HSBC Holdings Plc, as at 30 June 2020, unless otherwise indicated. -
Corporate Venturing Report 2019
Tilburg University 2019 Corporate Venturing Report Eckblad, Joshua; Gutmann, Tobias; Lindener, Christian Publication date: 2019 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Tilburg University Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Eckblad, J., Gutmann, T., & Lindener, C. (2019). 2019 Corporate Venturing Report. Corporate Venturing Research Group, TiSEM, Tilburg University. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 24. sep. 2021 Corporate Venturing 2019 Report SUMMIT@RSM All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2019. Created by Joshua Eckblad, Academic Researcher at TiSEM in The Netherlands. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LEAD AUTHORS 03 Forewords Joshua G. Eckblad 06 All Investors In External Startups [email protected] 21 Corporate VC Investors https://www.corporateventuringresearch.org/ 38 Accelerator Investors CentER PhD Candidate, Department of Management 43 2018 Global Startup Fundraising Survey (Our Results) Tilburg School of Economics and Management (TiSEM) Tilburg University, The Netherlands 56 2019 Global Startup Fundraising Survey (Please Distribute) Dr. -
Corporate Venturing Report 2019
Corporate Venturing 2019 Report SUMMIT@RSM All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2019. Created by Joshua Eckblad, Academic Researcher at TiSEM in The Netherlands. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LEAD AUTHORS 03 Forewords Joshua G. Eckblad 06 All Investors In External Startups [email protected] 21 Corporate VC Investors https://www.corporateventuringresearch.org/ 38 Accelerator Investors CentER PhD Candidate, Department of Management 43 2018 Global Startup Fundraising Survey (Our Results) Tilburg School of Economics and Management (TiSEM) Tilburg University, The Netherlands 56 2019 Global Startup Fundraising Survey (Please Distribute) Dr. Tobias Gutmann [email protected] https://www.corporateventuringresearch.org/ LEGAL DISCLAIMER Post-Doctoral Researcher Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG Chair of Strategic Management and Digital Entrepreneurship The information contained herein is for the prospects of specific companies. While HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management, Germany general guidance on matters of interest, and every attempt has been made to ensure that intended for the personal use of the reader the information contained in this report has only. The analyses and conclusions are been obtained and arranged with due care, Christian Lindener based on publicly available information, Wayra is not responsible for any Pitchbook, CBInsights and information inaccuracies, errors or omissions contained [email protected] provided in the course of recent surveys in or relating to, this information. No Managing Director with a sample of startups and corporate information herein may be replicated Wayra Germany firms. without prior consent by Wayra. Wayra Germany GmbH (“Wayra”) accepts no Wayra Germany GmbH liability for any actions taken as response Kaufingerstraße 15 hereto. -
UTI-Nifty Next 50 ETF) (An Open Ended Exchange Traded Fund)
KEY INFORMATION MEMORANDUM UTI - NIFTY NEXT 50 EXCHANGE TRADED FUND (UTI-NIFTY NEXT 50 ETF) (An open ended Exchange Traded Fund) The product is suitable for investors who are seeking*: v Long term investment v Investment in securities covered by Nifty Next 50 Index RISKOMETER * Investors should consult their financial advisers if in doubt about whether the product is suitable for them. New Fund Offer Opens on : Tuesday, July 18, 2017 New Fund Offer Closes on : Friday, July 28, 2017 Scheme Reopens on : Tuesday, August 8, 2017 Offer of Units of ` 10/-each for cash issued at a premium Approximately Equal to the Difference between Face Value and allotment Price during the New Fund Offer Period and at NAV based prices during Continuous Offer. This Key Information Memorandum (KIM) sets forth the information, which a prospective investor ought to know before investing. For further details of the scheme/Mutual Fund, due diligence certificate by the AMC, Key Personnel, Investors’ rights & services, risk factors, penalties & pending litigations etc. investors should, before investment, refer to the Scheme Information Document and Statement of Additional Information available free of cost at any of the UTI Financial Centres or distributors or from the website www.utimf.com. The scheme particulars have been prepared in accordance with Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual Funds) Regulations 1996, as amended till date, and filed with Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). The units being offered for public subscription have not been approved or disapproved by SEBI, nor has SEBI certified the accuracy or adequacy of this KIM. -
Annual Report on the Performance of Portfolio Companies, IX November 2016
Annual report on the performance of portfolio companies, IX November 2016 Annual report on the performance of portfolio companies, IX 1 Annual report on the performance of portfolio companies, IX - November 2016 Contents The report comprises four sections: 1 2 3 4 Objectives Summary Detailed Basis of and fact base findings findings findings P3 P13 P17 P45 Annual report on the performance of portfolio companies, IX - November 2016 Foreword This is the ninth annual report The report comprises information and analysis With a large number of portfolio companies, on the performance of portfolio to assess the potential effect of Private Equity a high rate of compliance, and nine years of ownership on several measures of performance information, this report provides comprehensive companies, a group of large, of the portfolio companies. This year, the and detailed information on the effect of Private Equity (PE) - owned UK report covers 60 portfolio companies as at 31 Private Equity ownership on many measures of businesses that met defined December 2015 (2014:62), as well as a further performance of an independently determined 69 portfolio companies that have been owned group of large, UK businesses. criteria at the time of acquisition. and exited since 2005. The findings are based Its publication is one of the steps on aggregated information provided on the This report has been prepared by EY at the portfolio companies by the Private Equity firms request of the BVCA and the PERG. The BVCA adopted by the Private Equity has supported EY in its work, particularly by industry following the publication that own them — covering the entire period of Private Equity ownership. -
Venture Capital Communities
Abstract Venture Capital Communities Syndicates account for two-thirds of the capital invested by venture capital firms. Through syndications, venture capitalists form several non-exclusive, partially overlapping partner- ships with other VC firms. We study the structure of these inter-VC alliances. We show that the repeated partnerships leads to agglomeration of VC firms into “communities” or soft- border conglomerates whose members are probabilistically more likely to partner with each other than with outsiders. We characterize the number and composition of communities and their economic e↵ects. Communities exhibit subtle composition e↵ects with heterogeneity on the dimensions of size, influence, and geography but homogeneity in industry and stage focus. These e↵ects are consistent with resource complementarity theories of organizational boundaries as well as theories in which syndicate members rely on and value each other for evaluation, screening, and risk-sharing. Community membership is associated with positive economic outcomes for portfolio firms. Firms sourcing capital from community VCs are more likely to exit and do so sooner. Our results are consistent with models in which VCs learn by doing and the e↵ectiveness of learning depends on the nature of a VC’s syndicate partners. Key words Venture Capital, Syndication, Community Detection, Social Interactions JEL classification G20, G24 1 Introduction Venture capital (VC) firms are financial intermediaries that provide capital to young en- trepreneurial firms. They raise capital from wealthy individuals or institutional investors such as pension funds and university endowments to invest in young and risky ventures with high upside. The VC industry has grown significantly since the first limited partnership was formed in 1958.