Operator Splitting and the Parareal Algorithm ∗ Jürgen Geiser A, , Stefan Güttel B

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Operator Splitting and the Parareal Algorithm ∗ Jürgen Geiser A, , Stefan Güttel B View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector J. Math. Anal. Appl. 388 (2012) 873–887 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications www.elsevier.com/locate/jmaa Coupling methods for heat transfer and heat flow: Operator splitting and the parareal algorithm ∗ Jürgen Geiser a, , Stefan Güttel b a Humboldt University of Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany b University of Oxford, England, United Kingdom article info abstract Article history: We propose an operator splitting method for coupling heat transfer and heat flow Received 25 May 2011 equations. This work is motivated by the need to couple independent industrial heat Available online 3 November 2011 transfer solvers (e.g., the Aura-Fluid software package) and heat flow solvers (e.g., Submitted by W.L. Wendland Openfoam). Such packages are often used to simulate the influence of solar heat in car bodies and are coupled by A-B splitting techniques. The main goal of this work is the Keywords: Heat transfer acceleration of the coupled software system by iterative operator splitting methods and Heat flux additional time-parallelism using the parareal algorithm. We present these new splitting Operator splitting techniques along with some novel convergence results and test the splitting-parareal Iterative operator splitting combination on various numerical problems. Parareal © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction We are interested in the fast solution of coupled heat transfer and heat flow equations with splitting and time paral- lelization techniques. We concentrate on iterative splitting methods, which are related to iterative solver methods and have two historical origins: • Picard–Lindelöf iterations [13,14], where waveform relaxation methods have their origins [20]. • Iterative split-operator approaches, see e.g. [10], wherein a two step method is derived to solve nonlinear reactive transport equations. A detailed description along with the theoretical background of iterative splitting schemes is given in the monograph [8]. The main advantage of iterative splitting schemes is the possibility to obtain higher accuracy of order O(τ i ) with addi- tional iterative steps (where i denotes the number of iterations and τ is the length of the time-step). This is different to standard splitting schemes with fixed order, e.g. A-B splitting of order O(τ ) or Strang splitting of order O(τ 2) (see [18]), where an increased accuracy can only be achieved through smaller time-steps τ , with the cost of an increased number of function evaluations, see [17]. Another advantage of (iterative) splitting schemes compared to the simultaneous solution of the full equation system is the possible simplification of the splitted equations representing decomposed operators, for which specialized solvers can be employed. For some practical problems, splitting techniques are unavoidable due to the fact that decoupled software packages specialized on different physical problems need to be combined. In the industrial application we have in mind (heat in car bodies), we have two different equations being solved with separate codes: while the heat transfer and radiation * Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (J. Geiser), [email protected] (S. Güttel). 0022-247X/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.10.030 874 J. Geiser, S. Güttel / J. Math. Anal. Appl. 388 (2012) 873–887 is solved with the Aura software package, the flow field of the temperature is computed with a flow-field solver, e.g. Openfoam or Vectis, see [19]. These software packages also implement space parallelization by domain decomposition. However, in order to employ even more processors (with a number above the critical number of processors for which space parallelization is saturated) we make use of the so-called parareal iteration, see [15]. This paper is organized as follows. The general model is described in Section 2. The splitting methods related to the model equations are given in Section 3. In Section 4 we briefly review the parareal time-parallelization iteration used in Section 5, wherein we report on various numerical experiments with test problems. 2. Mathematical model We consider a model of coupled heat transfer and heat flow. The heat transfer problem arises, for example, when the temperature distribution in a car body needs to be modeled over time, see [21], and therefore we have to apply large time-steps to simulate such problems. The heat flow is given as a simplification of the inviscid compressible Navier–Stokes equation, see [16]. We deal with a inviscid flow based on the assumption that viscous forces are small in comparison to inertial forces. Such situations can be identified as flows with a Reynolds number much greater than one. The assumption that viscous forces are negligible can be used to simplify the Navier–Stokes equations to the Euler equations. 1. Heat transfer equation (Heat equation): ∂t T =∇·(K ∇T ) −∇·(vT ), T (x,t0) = T0(x), (2.1) where the unknown temperature is denoted by T . This equation contains a diffusion part and a convection part, both of which are typically treated as independent operators in splitting methods. 2. Heat flow equation (Euler equation): ∂t v =−(v ·∇)v −∇p(T ), v(x,t0) = v0(x), (2.2) where the unknown flux is v and we assume ∇·v = 0. This equation contains a nonlinear flow part and a pressure part, both of which are typically treated as different, independent operators in splitting methods. However, in this paper we are not mainly concerned with decomposing the equations themselves, but rather in the coupling of both equations to each other by an iterative splitting scheme, see [12]. Remark 2.1. For simplicity, we sometimes (e.g., in the first of our numerical experiments) assume that p is independent of T , in which case we obtain a uni-directional coupling between (2.2) and (2.1). This means that one can solve (2.2) and then use the result directly for solving (2.1). Remark 2.2. The coupling of both equations becomes more involved when the dependence between them is strong or highly nonlinear. In particular, even the evaluation of ∇ p(T ) can become difficult if the pressure is only given implicitly. Therefore the idea is to apply an iterative splitting scheme, which couples the two delicate equations via a relaxation scheme, see [7]. With this as an advantage, we can do better than a non-iterative scheme that has stability problems, while we deal with stiff problems, see [17]. Here we use the smoothing property of the iterative schemes and overcome the stiffness problem, see [8]. 3. Splitting methods In the following we briefly discuss the coupling methods used for the heat transfer equation. 3.1. Lie–Trotter or A-B splitting method The simplest scheme (and probably the one implemented most often) is the so-called A-B splitting method: n n+1 n n ∂t v =−(v ·∇)v, with t t t , v x,t = v (x), (3.1) ∂ T + + =∇·(K ∇T ) −∇·v˜ T , with tn t tn 1, v˜ x,tn = vn 1(x), T x,tn = T x,tn (3.2) ∂t n n+1 n+1 where T is the known initial value of the previous solution and T (t ) = T2(x,t ) is the approximate solution of the full equation. This method results in a global splitting error O (t), where t denotes the length of the time-step. J. Geiser, S. Güttel / J. Math. Anal. Appl. 388 (2012) 873–887 875 3.2. Strang splitting The Strang splitting method is given by the following equations: ∂ T1(x,t) n n+1/2 n n n n =∇·(K ∇T1) −∇·v1 T1, with t t t , v1 x,t = v (x), T1 x,t = T x,t , (3.3) ∂t n n+1 n n ∂t v2 =−(v2 ·∇)v2, with t t t , v2 x,t = v (x), (3.4) ∂ T3(x,t) =∇·(K ∇T3) −∇·v3 T3, ∂t n+1/2 n+1 n+1/2 = n+1 = n+1/2 with t t t , v3 x,t v2 (x), T3(x,tn+1/2) T1 x,t , (3.5) n n+1 n+1 where T is the known initial value of the previous solution and T (t ) = T3(x,t ) is the approximate solution of the full equation. This method has a global splitting error of order O (t2). 3.3. Iterative splitting method 3.3.1. Linear case The following algorithm is based on an iteration with fixed splitting discretization step-size τ [1]. On the time interval + [tn,tn 1] we solve the following subproblems consecutively for i = 0, 2,...,2m: n n+1 n n ∂t vi =−(vi ·∇)vi, with t t t , vi x,t = v (x), (3.6) ∂ Ti n n+1 n n n n =∇·(K ∇Ti) −∇·vi−1 Ti, with t t t , vi−1 x,t = v (x), T x,t = T x,t (3.7) ∂t where T n, vn is the split approximation at time t = tn [1]. Here we solve the time-discretization with a backward differential formula of fourth order (BDF4 method), see [9]. The higher order is obtained by applying recursively a fixed-point iteration to reconstruct the analytical solution of the coupled operators, see [5]. 3.3.2. Generalization to systems of ODEs We deal with a vectorial iterative scheme, given as an inner and outer iterative scheme. While the outer iterative scheme is a Waveform relaxation scheme and could be seen as a coarse iterative scheme, since we iterate over the full system in one step.
Recommended publications
  • Components of Nonlinear Oscillation and Optimal Averaging for Stiff Pdes
    Components of Nonlinear Oscillation and Optimal Averaging for Stiff PDEs ADAMGEOFFREYPEDDLE I MUST GO DOWN TO THE SEAS AGAIN, TO THE LONELY SEA AND SKY, ANDALLIASKISATALLSHIPANDASTARTOSTEERHERBY; AND THE WHEEL’S KICK AND THE WIND’S SONG AND THE WHITE SAIL’S SHAKING, ANDAGREYMISTONTHESEA’SFACE,ANDAGREYDAWNBREAKING. IMUSTGODOWNTOTHESEASAGAIN,FORTHECALLOFTHERUNNINGTIDE ISAWILDCALLANDACLEARCALLTHATMAYNOTBEDENIED; AND ALL I ASK IS A WINDY DAY WITH THE WHITE CLOUDS FLYING, ANDTHEFLUNGSPRAYANDTHEBLOWNSPUME,ANDTHESEAGULLSCRYING. IMUSTGODOWNTOTHESEASAGAIN,TOTHEVAGRANTGYPSYLIFE, TO THE GULL’S WAY AND THE WHALE’S WAY AND THE WIND LIKE A WHETTED KNIFE; ANDALLIASKISAMERRYYARNFROMALAUGHINGFELLOWROVER, ANDAQUIETSLEEPANDASWEETDREAMWHENTHELONGTRICK’SOVER. JOHNMASEFIELD Components of Nonlinear Oscillation and Optimal Averaging for Stiff PDEs Submitted by Adam Peddle to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics, January 2018. This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (Signature) ......................................................................... Copyright © 2018 Adam Geoffrey Peddle Cover photo by the author published by the university of exeter First printing, April 2018 Abstract A novel solver which uses finite wave averaging to mitigate oscillatory stiffness is proposed and analysed. We have found that triad resonances contribute to the oscillatory stiffness of the problem and that they provide a natural way of understanding stability limits and the role averaging has on reducing stiffness. In particular, an explicit formulation of the nonlinearity gives rise to a stiffness regulator function which allows for analysis of the wave averaging.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficient Integration of Large Stiff Systems of Odes with Exponential
    Journal of Computational Physics 213 (2006) 748–776 www.elsevier.com/locate/jcp Efficient integration of large stiff systems of ODEs with exponential propagation iterative (EPI) methods M. Tokman * Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley, 1091 Evans Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-3840, United States School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95344, United States Received 31 August 2004; received in revised form 12 August 2005; accepted 29 August 2005 Available online 10 October 2005 Abstract A new class of exponential propagation techniques which we call exponential propagation iterative (EPI) methods is introduced in this paper. It is demonstrated how for large stiff systems these schemes provide an efficient alternative to standard integrators for computing solutions over long time intervals. The EPI methods are constructed by reformulating the integral form of a solution to a nonlinear autonomous system of ODEs as an expansion in terms of products between special functions of matrices and vectors that can be efficiently approximated using Krylov subspace projections. The methodology for constructing EPI schemes is presented and their performance is illustrated using numerical examples and comparisons with standard explicit and implicit integrators. The history of the exponential propagation type integra- tors and their connection with EPI schemes are also discussed. Ó 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. MSC: 34-xx; 65-xx Keywords: Exponential propagation iterative methods; EPI schemes; Exponential time differencing schemes; Krylov projections; Fast time integrators; Stiff systems; Numerical methods 1. Introduction The presence of a wide range of temporal scales in a system of differential equations poses a major difficulty for their integration over long time intervals.
    [Show full text]
  • Exponential Integrators for Stiff Systems
    2042-2 Co-sponsored School/Workshop on Integrable Systems and Scientific Computing 15 - 20 June 2009 Exponential integrators for stiff systems Paul Matthews University of Nottingham U.K. ———————————————————— e-mail:———————————————————— [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] Exponential integrators for stiff systems Paul Matthews School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK Aim: Develop efficient time-stepping methods for PDEs. • Lecture 1: Stiffness and numerical instability in ODEs and PDEs • Lecture 2: Introduction to exponential integrators • Lecture 3: Application to PDEs and more details Lecture 1: Stiffness and numerical instability in ODEs and PDEs There are many interesting nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs). These include dissipative equations such as the Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equation ut + uux = −uxx − uxxxx, the Swift–Hohenberg equation 2 2 3 ut = ru − (1 + ∇ ) u − u , and integrable PDEs such as the KdV equation ut + uux = uxxx and the nonlinear Schr¨odinger equation 2 ut = iuxx + i|u| u. Partial differential equations In most cases, we cannot solve these PDEs analytically, so it is useful to have accurate and efficient numerical methods. We will concentrate on the case of 1 space variable, although the methods generalise to 2 or 3 dimensions. Similarly, we can easily generalise to coupled equations, for example reaction–diffusion equations, Navier–Stokes equations. Definition: APDEissemilinear if the term with the highest spatial derivative is linear. Most of the nonlinear PDEs of interest are semilinear. Spatial discretization of PDEs To solve a PDE numerically we first discretize in space using finite differences (FD), finite elements or a spectral method.
    [Show full text]
  • A Class of Exponential Integrators Based on Spectral Deferred Correction ∗
    A Class of Exponential Integrators based on Spectral Deferred Correction ∗ Tommaso Buvoli y May 28, 2014 Abstract We introduce a new class of arbitrary-order exponential time differencing methods based on spectral deferred correction (ETDSDC) and describe a simple procedure for initializing the requisite matrix functions. We compare the stability and accuracy properties of our ETDSDC methods to those of an existing implicit-explicit spectral deferred correction scheme (IMEXSDC). We find that ETDSDC methods have larger accuracy regions and comparable stability regions. We conduct numerical experiments to compare ETD and IMEX spectral deferred correction schemes against a competing fourth-order ETD Runge-Kutta scheme. We find that high-order ETDSDC schemes are the most efficient in terms of function evaluations and overall speed when solving partial differential equations to high accuracy. Our results suggest that high-order ETDSDC schemes are well-suited to work in conjunction with spectral spatial methods or other high-order spatial discritizations. Additionally, ETDSDC schemes appear to be immune to severe order reduction, a problem which affects other ETD and IMEX schemes, including IMEXSDC. Keywords: Spectral deferred correction, exponential time differencing, implicit-explicit, high-order, stiff-systems, spectral methods. 1 Introduction In this paper we present a new class of arbitrary-order exponential time differencing (ETD) methods for solving nonlinear evolution equations of the form φt = Λφ + N (t; φ) where Λ is a stiff linear operator and N is a nonlinear operator. Such systems commonly arise when discretizing nonlinear wave equations including Burgers', nonlinear Schr¨odinger,Korteweg-de Vries, Kuramoto, Navier-Stokes, and the quasigeostrophic equation.
    [Show full text]
  • Exponential Euler Time Integrator for Simulation of Geothermal Processes in Heterogeneous Porous Media
    PROCEEDINGS, Thirty-Seventh Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, California, January 30 - February 1, 2012 SGP-TR-194 EXPONENTIAL EULER TIME INTEGRATOR FOR SIMULATION OF GEOTHERMAL PROCESSES IN HETEROGENEOUS POROUS MEDIA Antoine Tambue1, Inga Berre1,2, Jan M. Nordbotten1,3, Tor Harald Sandve1 1Dept. of Mathematics, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7800, N5020 Bergen, Norway 2Chrisian Michelsen Research AS, Norway 3Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, USA e-mail: [email protected] interacting processes acting on different scales leads ABSTRACT to challenges in solving the coupled system of equations describing the dominant physics. Simulation of geothermal systems is challenging due to coupled physical processes in highly Standard discretization methods include finite heterogeneous media. Combining the exponential element, finite volume and finite difference methods Euler time integrator with finite volume (two-point or for the space discretization (see (Císařová, Kopal, multi-point flux approximations) space Královcová, & Maryška, 2010; Hayba & Ingebritsen, discretizations leads to a robust methodology for 1994; Ingebritsen, Geiger, Hurwitz, & Driesner, simulating geothermal systems. In terms of efficiency 2010) and references therein), while standard and accuracy, the exponential Euler time integrator implicit, explicit or implicit-explicit methods are used has advantages over standard time-dicretization for the discretization in time. Challenges with the schemes, which suffer from time-step restrictions or discretization are, amongst others, related to severe excessive numerical diffusion when advection time-step restrictions associated with explicit processes are dominating. Based on linearization of methods and excessive numerical diffusion for the equation at each time step, we make use of a implicit methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Stokes Equation∗
    SIAM J. SCI.COMPUT. c 2018 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. B684{B705 AN EXPONENTIAL TIME INTEGRATOR FOR THE INCOMPRESSIBLE NAVIER{STOKES EQUATION∗ GIJS L. KOOIJy , MIKE A. BOTCHEVz , AND BERNARD J. GEURTSx Abstract. We present an exponential time integration method for the incompressible Navier{ Stokes equation. An essential step in our procedure is the treatment of the pressure by applying a divergence-free projection to the momentum equation. The differential-algebraic equation for the discrete velocity and pressure is then reduced to a conventional ordinary differential equation that can be solved with the proposed exponential integrator. A promising feature of exponential time integration is its potential time parallelism within the Paraexp algorithm. We demonstrate that our approach leads to parallel speedup assuming negligible parallel communication. Key words. exponential time integration, incompressible Navier{Stokes equation, block Krylov subspace method, parallel in time AMS subject classifications. 65F60, 65L05, 65Y05 DOI. 10.1137/17M1121950 1. Introduction. With today's trend toward massively parallel computing, there is a growing interest in parallel-in-time simulations. For the numerical solution of par- tial differential equations, a parallellization in time could realize additional speedup, when, for example, the maximum speedup with a parallellization in space is ap- proached, e.g., see [40, 56]. Parallel-in-time simulations received increased atten- tion after the introduction of the Parareal method [29, 42]; for earlier work see, e.g., [8, 15, 61, 62]. So far, existing methods have not proven themselves to be partic- ularly efficient for parallel-in-time simulations of flows at high Reynolds numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Exponential Integrators for First Order Semi-Linear Problems
    NORGES TEKNISK-NATURVITENSKAPELIGE UNIVERSITET A review of exponential integrators for first order semi-linear problems by Borislav V. Minchev and Will M. Wright PREPRINT NUMERICS NO. 2/2005 NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY TRONDHEIM, NORWAY This report has URL http://www.math.ntnu.no/preprint/numerics/2005/N2-2005.ps Address: Department of Mathematical Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway. Abstract Recently, there has been a great deal of interest in the construction of exponential integrators. These integrators, as their name suggests, use the exponential function (and related functions) of the Jacobian or an approx- imation to it, inside the numerical method. However, unlike some of the recent literature suggests, integrators based on this philosophy have been known since at least 1960. The aim of this paper is to review exponential integrators, designed for first order problems, however, we will also briefly discuss some recent research into the construction of exponential integra- tors, for special problems. Our hope is, that with this article, by reviewing as much of the history of exponential integrators as reasonable possible, we can point interested readers to appropriate references and hopefully reduce the reinvention of known results. 1 Introduction Even though the theory of numerical methods for time integration is well es- tablished for a general class of problems, recently due to improvements in the efficient computation of the exponential function, exponential integrators for the time integration of semi-linear problems 0 y (t)= f(y(t)) = Ly(t)+ N(y(t)), y(tn−1)= yn−1. (1.1) have emerged as a viable alternative.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2011.07709V1 [Math.NA]
    Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) A high-order exponential integrator for nonlinear parabolic equations with nonsmooth initial data Buyang Li and Shu Ma Abstract A variable stepsize exponential multistep integrator, with contour integral approximation of the operator- valued exponential functions, is proposed for solving semilinear parabolic equations with nonsmooth initial data. By this approach, the exponential k-step method would have kth-order convergence in approximating a mild solution, pos- sibly nonsmooth at the initial time. In consistency with the theoretical analysis, a numerical example shows that the method can achieve high-order convergence in the maximum norm for semilinear parabolic equations with discontinu- ous initial data. Key words nonlinear parabolic equation, nonsmooth initial data, exponential integrator, variable stepsize, high-order accuracy, discontinuous initial data. 1 Introduction Let A be the generator of a bounded analytic semigroup on a Banach space X, with domain D(A) ⊂ X, and consider the abstract semilinear initial-value problem u′(t) − Au(t) = f(t, u(t)) for t ∈ (0, T ], (1) ( u(0) = u0, where u0 ∈ X and f : [0, ∞) × X → X is a smooth (locally Lipschitz continuous) function. A function u ∈ C([0, T ]; X) is called a mild solution of (1) if it satisfies the integral equation t tA (t−s)A u(t) = e u0 + e f(s,u(s))ds, ∀ t ∈ (0, T ], (2) Z0 where etA denotes the semigroup generated by the operator A. In the linear case f(t, u) ≡ f(t), time discretization of (1) by a kth-order Runge–Kutta method satisfies the follow- ing error estimate: k −k kun − u(tn)k ≤ Cτ tn for u0 ∈ X, (3) arXiv:2011.07709v1 [math.NA] 16 Nov 2020 where τ denotes the stepsize of time discretization; see [22,28].
    [Show full text]
  • On the Performance of Exponential Integrators for Problems in Magnetohydrodynamics
    On the performance of exponential integrators for problems in magnetohydrodynamics Lukas Einkemmera,∗, Mayya Tokmanb, John Loffeldc aUniversity of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria bUniversity of California, Merced, United States of America cLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, United States of America Abstract Exponential integrators have been introduced as an efficient alternative to explicit and implicit methods for integrating large stiff systems of differential equations. Over the past decades these methods have been studied theoret- ically and their performance was evaluated using a range of test problems. While the results of these investigations showed that exponential integra- tors can provide significant computational savings, the research on validat- ing this hypothesis for large scale systems and understanding what classes of problems can particularly benefit from the use of the new techniques is in its initial stages. Resistive magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) modeling is widely used in studying large scale behavior of laboratory and astrophys- ical plasmas. In many problems numerical solution of MHD equations is a challenging task due to the temporal stiffness of this system in the pa- rameter regimes of interest. In this paper we evaluate the performance of exponential integrators on large MHD problems and compare them to a state-of-the-art implicit time integrator. Both the variable and constant time step exponential methods of EpiRK-type are used to simulate magnetic reconnection and the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability in plasma. Performance of these methods, which are part of the EPIC software package, is com- pared to the variable time step variable order BDF scheme included in the CVODE (part of SUNDIALS) library. We study performance of the meth- arXiv:1604.02614v2 [math.NA] 31 Mar 2018 ods on parallel architectures and with respect to magnitudes of important parameters such as Reynolds, Lundquist, and Prandtl numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Exponential Methods for Solving Hyperbolic Problems with Application to Kinetic Equations Nicolas Crouseilles, Lukas Einkemmer, Josselin Massot
    Exponential methods for solving hyperbolic problems with application to kinetic equations Nicolas Crouseilles, Lukas Einkemmer, Josselin Massot To cite this version: Nicolas Crouseilles, Lukas Einkemmer, Josselin Massot. Exponential methods for solving hyperbolic problems with application to kinetic equations. Journal of Computational Physics, Elsevier, 2020, 420, pp.109688. 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109688. hal-02321916v2 HAL Id: hal-02321916 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02321916v2 Submitted on 11 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Exponential methods for solving hyperbolic problems with application to collisionless kinetic equations Nicolas Crouseillesa, Lukas Einkemmerb, and Josselin Massotc aUniv Rennes, Inria Bretagne Atlantique (MINGuS) & ENS Rennes bDepartment of Mathematics, University of Innsbruck, Austria cUniv Rennes & Inria Bretagne Atlantique (MINGuS) November 11, 2020 Abstract The efficient numerical solution of many kinetic models in plasma physics is impeded by the stiffness of these systems. Exponential integrators are attractive in this context as they remove the CFL condition induced by the linear part of the system, which in practice is often the most stringent stability constraint. In the literature, these schemes have been found to perform well, e.g., for drift-kinetic problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Exponential Methods for Solving Hyperbolic Problems with Application to Collisionless Kinetic Equations
    Exponential methods for solving hyperbolic problems with application to collisionless kinetic equations Nicolas Crouseillesa, Lukas Einkemmerb, and Josselin Massotc aUniv Rennes, Inria Bretagne Atlantique (MINGuS) & ENS Rennes bDepartment of Mathematics, University of Innsbruck, Austria cUniv Rennes & Inria Bretagne Atlantique (MINGuS) November 16, 2020 Abstract The efficient numerical solution of many kinetic models in plasma physics is impeded by the stiffness of these systems. Exponential integrators are attractive in this context as they remove the CFL condition induced by the linear part of the system, which in practice is often the most stringent stability constraint. In the literature, these schemes have been found to perform well, e.g., for drift-kinetic problems. Despite their overall efficiency and their many favorable properties, most of the commonly used exponential integrators behave rather erratically in terms of the allowed time step size in some situations. This severely limits their utility and robustness. Our goal in this paper is to explain the observed behavior and suggest exponential methods that do not suffer from the stated deficiencies. To accomplish this we study the stability of exponential integrators for a linearized problem. This analysis shows that classic exponential integrators exhibit severe deficiencies in that regard. Based on the analysis conducted we pro- pose to use Lawson methods, which can be shown not to suffer from the same stability issues. We confirm these results and demonstrate the efficiency of Lawson methods by performing numerical simulations for both the Vlasov{Poisson system and a drift-kinetic model of a ion temperature gradient instability. Keywords| exponential integrators, Lawson schemes, kinetic equations, hyperbolic PDEs, numerical stability, drift-kinetic equations 1 Introduction The goal of this work is to develop high order and efficient numerical methods for nonlinear collisionless kinetic models, such as the Vlasov-Poisson equations or drift-kinetic models.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparaison of Exponential Integrators and Traditional Time Integration Schemes for the Shallow Water Equations Matthieu Brachet, Laurent Debreu, Christopher Eldred
    Comparaison of Exponential integrators and traditional time integration schemes for the Shallow Water equations Matthieu Brachet, Laurent Debreu, Christopher Eldred To cite this version: Matthieu Brachet, Laurent Debreu, Christopher Eldred. Comparaison of Exponential integrators and traditional time integration schemes for the Shallow Water equations. 2020. hal-02479047v2 HAL Id: hal-02479047 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02479047v2 Preprint submitted on 8 Apr 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. COMPARAISON OF EXPONENTIAL INTEGRATORS AND TRADITIONAL TIME INTEGRATION SCHEMES FOR THE SHALLOW WATER EQUATIONS M. BRACHETy;1, L. DEBREUy;2 AND C. ELDREDy;3 Abstract. The time integration scheme is probably one of the most fundamental choices in the devel- opment of an ocean model. In this paper, we investigate several time integration schemes when applied to the shallow water equations. These set of equations is accurate enough for the modeling of a shallow ocean and is also relevant to study as it is the one solved for the barotropic (i.e. vertically averaged) component of a three dimensional ocean model. We analyze different time stepping algorithms for the linearized shallow water equations.
    [Show full text]