DOCSLIB.ORG

Five Rivers Landscape Management Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Five Rivers Landscape Management Project Five Rivers Landscape Management Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Waldport Ranger District Siuslaw National Forest Lincoln and Lane Counties, Oregon Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Official: Gloria D. Brown, Forest Supervisor Siuslaw National Forest 4077 Research Way (P.O. Box 1148, 97339) Corvallis, OR 97333 For Information Contact: Doris Tai, District Ranger Paul Thomas, Project Team Leader Waldport Ranger District 1049 SW Pacific Hwy. (P.O. Box 400) Waldport, OR 97394 (541) 563-3211 E-mail address: [email protected] [email protected] The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326- W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Abstract: The Waldport Ranger District proposes management actions in the Five Rivers watershed in response to direction in the Northwest Forest Plan, the Siuslaw Forest Plan as amended, and recommendations in the Lobster-Five Rivers Watershed Analysis. Public comments on the draft were considered in developing this final environmental impact statement. The proposed actions, designed to restore terrestrial and aquatic habitats in the Five Rivers watershed, include designating 12 management study areas as part of a learning design; commercial thinning older plantations; reopening some temporary and system roads, building temporary roads, and closing and decommissioning system roads; precommercial thinning of younger plantations; planting shade-tolerant conifer and various hardwood trees in riparian areas; maintaining existing meadows and plantations in early-seral conditions; and issuing a special-use permit for building and maintaining a private road. Three alternatives were fully developed and considered: Alternative 1, the actions described, including road building, reopening, and repair; Alternative 2, the actions described, but without road building, reopening, or repair; and Alternative 3, no action. Alternative 1 is the Forest Service’s preferred alternative. Cover design: Graphics, Dan White; Photos, Bernard Bormann (landscape), George Moeller (scientist and managers), Dave Pilz (people and fungi), Jack Sleeper (riparian planting). Why is this project needed? Why is this project needed, and what evidence CHAPTER 1 established these needs? Chapter titles are framed as questions intended to focus the writing and to alert readers to judge whether the answers provided are adequate. For readers accustomed to earlier environmental documents, chapter 1 is equivalent to the “Purpose and Need for Action” section. Note: This EIS and its appendices contain information that differs from or was not in the draft EIS. The changes respond to new information, public comment, advice from regulatory agencies, and corrections. For example, chapter 2 contains additional material that responds to public preference for more specific information on the alternatives. Chapter 3 contains information requested by the public and regulatory agencies about existing road and water-quality conditions, existing road maintenance and costs, and updates the biological assessment. Chapter 4 contains added material about sedimentation from roads, water quality, public and management access, economics, and updates discussions on bald eagles, northern spotted owls, and marbled murrelets. Additional tables provide more-specific information by subwatershed, and effects on aquatic conservation objectives and environmental justice were also added. Appendices 1 through 5 of the draft are now A through E. Appendices A through C have been modified to include additional or more-specific information requested by the public. The Planning Area The area included in the Five Rivers Landscape Management Project lies within the Five Rivers- Lobster Creek fifth-field watershed of the Alsea River basin. The planning area is about 34 air miles southwest of Corvallis and 40 air miles northwest of Eugene, Oregon (map 1); it includes eight subwatersheds and covers about 37,000 acres. About 13% of the planning area is privately owned, and the rest is managed by the U.S. Forest Service. The Proposed Project The Five Rivers Landscape Management Project is a package of associated terrestrial and watershed restoration projects. They include commercially thinning plantations now less than 50 years old, decommissioning roads, placing large conifer trees--up to 36 inches in diameter at breast height--in streams, and planting conifers and hardwoods in riparian areas. A management study, designed to compare management strategies, is part of the proposal. The Problems To Be Addressed Based on available information, and direction from the Northwest Forest Plan (the Plan), previous Forest Supervisor Jim Furnish identified the following problems (USDA 1999): 1 Why is this project needed? Not enough is known for people to agree on a single approach to meet the goals of the Northwest Forest Plan, partly a result of ineffective past monitoring strategies. Especially poorly known is how plantations, riparian zones, and roads can be efficiently managed together through time. Thus, he saw a need to speed learning by comparing a variety of strategies for achieving late-successional conditions and aquatic conservation. The shortage of late-successional habitat in the Pacific Northwest limits recovery of old- growth-dependent species such as the northern spotted owl and the marbled murrelet. Thus, he saw a need to speed development of late-successional habitat in late-successional and riparian reserves. The shortage of properly functioning aquatic habitat in the Oregon Coast Range limits recovery of cold-water species such as coho salmon. Thus, he saw a need to improve watershed function. The Northwest Forest Plan called for substantial timber production from the matrix lands, but murrelets are almost always found in surveyed mature forest on the Siuslaw matrix lands, which are then redesignated as late-successional reserves. Thus, he saw the need to simultaneously produce timber from plantations and meet late-successional objectives on matrix lands. Evidence Used by the Forest Supervisor in Deciding to Address These Problems The record of decision (USDA, USDI 1994b) for the Northwest Forest Plan--based on physical, biological, and societal evidence provided in the Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team report (USDA, USDI, et al. 1993) and described in the Plan’s environmental impact statement (USDA, USDI 1994a)--is intended to provide for: Healthy forest ecosystems, including protecting riparian areas and waters; A suitable supply of timber and other forest products to help maintain local and regional economies predictably over the long term; and Adaptive management--described as a process of action-based planning, monitoring, researching, evaluating, and adjusting--to improve future land management decisions. The Plan identified concern for northern spotted owls, marbled murrelets, and anadromous fish in the Oregon Coast Range Province (which includes the Siuslaw National Forest) because of its isolation and harvest history (chapters 3 and 4; p. 21). The record of decision, which amended the Siuslaw Forest Plan, allocated federal lands in the Five Rivers watershed into one or more of the following: Late-successional reserve; Riparian reserve; or Matrix (lands not included in the other two allocations). The Plan identified specific environmental conditions and appropriate commodities and amenities to be produced and maintained in each land allocation. It also outlined the rules and limits governing possible activities for achieving desired conditions in each allocation. The Assessment Report for Federal Lands in and Adjacent to the Oregon Coast Province (USDA 1995a) shows the planning area in the central interior block (block 6). The mature conifer stands 2 Why is this project needed? in block 6 have been extensively clearcut, and few patches of functional late-successional forest remain. The central interior block once supported the largest unfragmented patches of late- successional forest in the Province. The Report recommends managing to accelerate successional development and to aggregate small patches into larger ones. The Report describes the in-stream fish habitat on federal lands throughout the Province as being in marginal to poor condition. It recommends specific actions to improve fish habitat on federal land by: Stabilizing, decommissioning, or obliterating roads; Restoring immediate habitat conditions by adding large wood to streams; and Restoring long-term habitat by reestablishing natural riparian areas through actions such as riparian planting. For needing to learn The need to learn, for individuals and society as a whole, is strongest when uncertainty exists about how events will unfold. The current extent and intensity of debate among managers, scientists, and citizens over outcomes of land-management strategies provide strong evidence that sufficient
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coarse Woody Debris in Streams of the Drift Creek Basin, Oregon by Curt N. Veldhuisen a THESIS Oregon State University in Partia
    Coarse Woody Debris in Streams of the Drift Creek Basin, Oregon by Curt N. Veldhuisen A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Completed February 20, 1990 Commencement June 1990 AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Curt N. Veldhuisenfor the degree of Master of Science in Forest Engineeringpresented on February 27, 1990. Title: Coarse Woody Debris in Streams of the Drift Creek Basin. Oregon Abstract Approved: Robert L. Beschta This study examined the occurrence ofcoarse woody debris (i.e., pieces greater than 0.15m in diameter and 2.0 m in length) in first- through fifth-order streams located within the Drift Creek Basin of the Oregon Coast Range. Nine "tributary reachest were surveyed to determine how three land management treatments (undisturbed, patch clearcut with buffer strip, and entirely clearcut) and/or geomorphologywere associated with CWD loadings or piece characteristics. An additional 45 km of third- to fifth-order channelswere surveyed to identify CWD distribution patternsover changing stream size. All surveys recorded channel characteristics and the dimensions and attributes ofeach CWD piece. Coarse woody debris loadings varied greatly (11 to 62 pieces/lOOm, 0.3 to 4.3 m3/100m2 of inchannelvolume) between the tributary reaches, but were not significantly (p > 0.10) related to harvest treatment. However, reaches associated with clearcut treatment containedless hardwood CWD and pieces were significantly shorter, and more decayed than in the other treatments. This suggested that little CWD recruitment had occurred in the 15 to 20 years since harvest. The undisturbed and buffer strip tributaries contained CWD that reflected continued recruitment of both hardwood and conifer trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Alsea River Watershed Analysis
    Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................. iii List of Tables ....................................................... xx List of Figures ..................................................... xxii List of Maps ...................................................... xxiii Chapter 1 - Characterization ............................................ 1 Chapter 2 - Issues and Key Questions ..................................... 6 Chapter 3 - Reference and Current Conditions ............................. 10 Forest Fragmentation ............................................ 10 Aquatic Habitat ................................................. 32 Human Uses ................................................... 72 Chapter 4 - Interpretation/Findings and Recommendations ................... 86 References ......................................................... 96 Appendices ........................................................ 103 Map Packet ........................................... (following p. 123) Page ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Characterization: The Analysis Area The Lower Alsea River watershed, located in the Alsea River Basin, encompasses about 98,470 land acres of the western Oregon Coast Range mountains along the lower Alsea River in Benton and Lincoln counties (Map 1: “Alsea Basin and Lower Alsea Analysis Area”). The watershed, with State Highway 34 running through it, stretches from Waldport on the coast to the inland town of Alsea. About 14 per cent of the watershed (13,786 acres) is managed by the Bureau
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Scour in Weak Rock of the Oregon Coast Range
    PREDICTING SCOUR IN WEAK ROCK OF THE OREGON COAST RANGE Final Report SPR 382 Oregon Department of Transportation PREDICTING SCOUR IN WEAK ROCK OF THE OREGON COAST RANGE Final Report SPR 382 by Dr. Stephen E. Dickenson Associate Professor and Michael W. Baillie Graduate Research Assistant Dept. of Civil Construction and Environmental Engineering Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97331 for Oregon Department of Transportation Research Group Salem, OR 97301-5192 and Federal Highway Administration Washington, DC 20590 October 1999 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-OR-RD-00-04 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date October 1999 Predicting Scour in Weak Rock of the Oregon Coast Range 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Stephen E. Dickenson and Michael W. Baillie 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Oregon State University Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering 11. Contract or Grant No. 202 Apperson Hall K5029A Corvallis, Oregon 97331 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Oregon Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Research Group and Washington, D.C. 20590 Final Report 200 Hawthorne SE, Suite B-240 Salem, Oregon 97301-5192 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes 16. ABSTRACT Recent experience in the Coast Range Province of Oregon demonstrates that weak sedimentary bedrock in stream channels can be vulnerable to scour. The presence of erodible rock adjacent to bridge foundations and abutments necessitates monitoring of the channel to preclude costly repairs, or in an extreme case undermining of the foundations and bridge collapse.
    [Show full text]
  • State Waterway Navigability Determination
    BODY OF WATER & LOCATION NAV CG NON-NAV CG REMARKS yellow highlight = apply to USCG for permit up to RM stipulated Alsea Bay, OR X Estuary of Pacific Ocean. Alsea River, OR X Flows into Alsea Bay, Waldport, OR. Navigable to mile 13. Ash Creek, OR X Tributary of Willamette River at Independence, OR. Barrett Slough, OR X Tributary of Lewis and Clark River. Bayou St. John, OR X Court decision, 1935 AMC 594, 10 Mile Lake, Coos County, OR. Bear Creek (Coos County), OR X Tributary of Coquille River (tidal at mile 0.5) Beaver Creek, OR X Tributary of Nestucca River. Beaver Slough, OR X See Clatskanie River. Big Creek (Lane County), OR X At U.S. 101 bridge (tidal). Big Creek (Lincoln County), OR X Flows into Pacific Ocean. Big Creek Slough, OR X Upstream end at Knappa, OR (tidal). At site of Birch Creek (Sparks) Bridge on Canyon Road near Birch Creek, OR X Pendleton, OR. Side channel of Yaquina River. 3 mi. downstream from Toledo, Blind Slough, OR X OR (tidal). Tributary of Knappa Slough. 10 mi. upstream from Astoria, OR Blind Slough/ Gnat Creek, OR X (tidal at mile 2.0). Boone Slough, OR X Tributary of Yaquina River between Newport and Toledo, OR. Side channel of Willamette River. 3 miles upstream from Booneville Channel, OR X Corvallis, OR. Boulder Creek, OR X 7 miles N of Lake Quinalt. Side channel of Columbia River. 5 miles N of Clatskanie, OR Bradbury Slough, OR X (tidal). Brownlee Reservoir, ID /OR X See Snake River. Also known as South Channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring and Evaluation Report, Fiscal Years 2006
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Monitoring and Service Evaluation Report Pacific Northwest Region Siuslaw National Forest Fiscal Year 2008 Baker Beach, Siuslaw National Forest Central Coast Ranger District-Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area ii August, 2009 Thank you for taking the time and interest in reviewing the results of the Siuslaw National Forest 2008 Monitoring Report. The report focuses on key monitoring activities and findings since the previous publication in 2008. It also summarizes some of our most successful restoration projects. As you read the report you will see where we are using our past successful restoration projects to build upon and improve restoration projects in the future. The Forest still remains diligent in eliminating threats to the Forest including invasive species which is discussed under ‘Lake Fish Habitat’ and preventing the rising of stream temperatures above State Standards, where we discuss under the section titled ‘Water Quality’. In the last several years the Forest built and maintained several partnerships, started and completed several successful restoration projects. In this report you will be able to review the outcome of this work. The Siuslaw is currently scheduled to begin Forest Plan revision in 2014. Until we begin Plan revision, it is my commitment to keep you informed of the results of monitoring through this report; however if you would like more information, feel free to contact the Forest or visit our website at www.fs.fed.us/r6/siulsaw. Your continued interest in the Forest Plan is just one way for you to stay current with activities on your public lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Statusof Nestucca River Winter Steelhead
    2003-01 Assessment of the Status of Nestucca and Alsea Winter Steelhead, 2002 Assessment of the Status of Nestucca and Alsea River Winter Steelhead, 2002 G. L. Susac S.E. Jacobs Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife P.O. Box 59 Portland, Oregon 97207 June 2003 This work was financed in part by the Sport Fish and Wildlife Restoration Program administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Projects F-181-D-03 and F-162-R-07. CONTENTS ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………………………….ii INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 STUDY AREA................................................................................................................. 1 METHODS ...................................................................................................................... 1 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................... 3 Spawning Timing....................................................................................................... 3 Detection of Hatchery Strays.................................................................................... 4 Spawning Distribution............................................................................................... 6 Redd Abundance ....................................................................................................... 6 DISCUSSION.................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Survey of Alsea Area, Oregon by John F
    This is a scanned version of the text of the original Soil Survey report of Alsea Area, Oregon issued October 1973. Original tables and maps were deleted. There may be references in the text that refer to a table that is not in this document. Updated tables were generated from the NRCS National Soil Information System (NASIS). The soil map data has been digitized and may include some updated information. These are available from http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov. Please contact the State Soil Scientist, Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) for additionalinformation. SOIL SURVEY OF ALSEA AREA, OREGON BY JOHN F. CORLISS, SOIL SCIENTIST, OREGON AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION FIELDWORK BY JOHN F. CORLISS AND JOEL A. NORGREN, OREGON AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION; C.T. DYRNESS, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; AND CLARENCE KNEZEVICH, SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE AND FOREST SERVICE, AND UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, IN COOPERATION WITH THE OREGON BOARD OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE OREGON AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION THE ALSEA AREA is the geographic area that is drained by Forest Service and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management. the Alsea River and its tributaries on the west slope of the Farming is limited to the bottom lands and low terraces Oregon Coast Range in the extreme west-central part of along the major streams. Small grains, berries, nuts, and Oregon (fig. 1). It is bordered on the west bulbs are grown, but in most places these nearly level to moderately sloping soils are used for pasture.
    [Show full text]
  • MID COASTBASIN Ri
    7frL'J1Mt MID COASTBASIN ri c g1 1,11 £ ,_,.A, : 1?* State Water Resources Board May 1965 MID-COASTBASIN U STATE WATER RESOURCES BOARD SALEM, OREGON 1 May 1965 V.'w M1 I i A i BOARD MEMBERS I JOHN D. DAVIS, CHAIRMAN - Stayton R RUTH HAGENSTEIN, VICE CHAIRMAN - Portland EMERY N. CASTLE - Corvallis LaSELLE E. COLES - Prineville LOUIS H. FOOTE - Forest Grove WILLIAM L. JESS - Eagle Point I KARL W. ONTHANK - Eugene IDONEL J. LANE, Executive Secretary I I I I I I I I I, I I I I I COVER PICTURE I Coastal scene at Depoe Bay, Price $2.50 Oregon. Oregon State Highway Department photo. n H I L TABLEOF CONTENTS PAGE LISTOFTABLES ........ vi LISTOFFIGURES ................viii PURPOSE AND INTRODUCTION ...... ix FINDINGSANDCONCLUSIONS ................ x PART I THE BASIN PHYSICAL FEATURES Geographic Setting .............. I I Counties and Basin Areas . ....... 2 StreamSystem ............... 4 Climate ......... ....... ECONOMIC FACTORS History of Settlement ......... 6 7 Population . ................... Transportation ................... 9 Land Use and Ownership ........... 10 EconomicBase .................. 13 Agriculture .................... 14 Forestry...................... 17 Mining....................... 19 Manufacturing ................... 20 Recreation ................. 22 PART II WATER SUPPLY SURFACE WATER Annual Yield .................... 26 Seasonal Distribution ............... 28 Extreme Discharges ................. 30 WaterRights .................... 33 Legal Restrictions ................. 36 Maximum Legal Depletions .............. 37 GROUND
    [Show full text]
  • Alsea Stewardship Group Area UV20 77925 Newport " Benton 77927
    77921 Alsea Stewardship Group Area UV20 77925 Newport " Benton 77927 77924 Yaquina River 77337 77970 77962 " 77922 Corvallis 77923 Mary's Peak 77969 Drift Creek 77961 77339 77953 77963 Mary's Peak Waldport " Tidewater 77964 & Alsea 77344 " 77952 77968 Lincoln Alsea River Alsea Alsea N. Fork 77965 " 77966 Alsea River 77967 UV34 77955 77342 77971 S. Fork UV101 Alsea River 77960 77954 77951 77973 77972 77959 77341 Yachats 77958 Lobster Creek River Five 77974 Rivers Lane 77956 77335 77957 77995 77975 77991 77993 77996 77334 77976 UV99 77992 77329 77999 77997 77977 Siuslaw 78000 " Eugene N. Fork Siuslaw River UV126 " Siuslaw River Alsea Stewardship Area's 6th Field Watersheds Lane 77329 Headwaters Long Tom River 77954 Lower South Fork Alsea River 77971 Big Creek-Frontal Pacific Ocean 77334 Bear Creek-Long Tom River 77955 Lower North Fork Alsea River 77972 Upper Yachats River Siuslaw National Forest 77335 Ferguson Creek-Long Tom River 77956 Upper Lobster Creek 77973 Lower Yachats River 77337 Tumtum River 77957 Upper Five Rivers 77974 Cummins Creek-Frontal Pacific Ocean Legend 77339 Greasy Creek 77958 Middle Five Rivers 77975 Tenmile Creek Alsea Stewardship Group Area U.S. Forest Service 77341 Upper Muddy Creek 77959 Lower Lobster Creek 77976 Cape Creek-Frontal Pacific Ocean Alsea Subwatershed Boundary BLM 77342 Oliver Creek 77960 Lower Five Rivers 77977 Mercer Lake-Frontal Pacific Ocean Rivers Private/Other 77344 Beaver Creek 77961 Upper Drift Creek 77991 Upper Deadwood Creek Highways State Land 77921 Simpson Creek-Yaquina River 77962 Middle
    [Show full text]
  • 2004-2005 Introduction Table of Contents
    MidCoast Watersheds Council Annual Report 2004-2005 Introduction Table of Contents The MidCoast Watersheds Council (MCWC) Introduction 2 is a local non-profit organization dedicated to Partners 3 improving the health of streams and watersheds Annual Messages 4 of Oregon’s central coast so they produce clean Directors and Officers 6 water, rebuild healthy salmon populations, and Staff and Committees 7 support a healthy ecosystem and economy. Basin Planning Teams 8 The MCWC works in an area of nearly one Education 10 million acres, including all streams draining from Monitoring and Assessment 12 the crest of the Coast Range to the Pacific, from Recovery Planning 14 the Salmon River to Cape Creek at Heceta Head. Restoration Projects 15 This area includes the watersheds of the Salmon, Restoration Tactics Revisited 16 Siletz, Yaquina, Alsea, and Yachats rivers, and more than 28 smaller ocean tributaries. Public Outreach 18 Drift Creek Water Rights 19 The MCWC is dedicated to achieving the follow- Tenth Anniversary 20 ing goals: Milestones 22 Financial Summary 23 1. To provide a public forum for discussion and education of regional watershed issues. 2. To assess the conditions of MidCoast watersheds. 3. To implement and monitor scientifically-based projects to promote the protection or restoration of healthy fish and wildlife resources, water quality and quantity, and overall watershed health. 2 Partners The MidCoast Watersheds Council thanks our many partners who contributed to our work in 2004-2005 Angell Job Corps NOAA Restoration Center Benton County Public Works Natural Resource Conservation Service Benton Soil and Water Conservation District Oregon Coast Community College Bio Surveys Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Alsea Falls Loop Guide
    Vernonia Nehalem Hwy Wilson River Hwy Banks North Plains 30 47 Cornelius Pass Rd Cornell Rd Hillsboro Forest Grove 8 8 205 Henry Beaverton Hagg 43 Lake 219 217 Scoggins Valley Rd Boring Gaston River Rd Spring Hill Rd Lake Oswego Damascus Bald Peak Rd Laurel Rd Scholls Ferry Rd Tigard Clackamas 224 212 210 Tu a lati n r 219 Rive 43 Sandy 99W 205 Tualatin Rd Stafford Rd Galdstone Roy Rogers Rd Scholls-Sherwood Rd Tualatin Bald Peak Rd 211 Rd 47 ood 205 rw She Tualatin West Linn 219 Sherwood 211 Springwater Rd Mountain Rd 99E Yamhill Boones Ferry Rd Stafford Rd Oregon City 213 240 99W Wilsonville Estacada Carlton Newberg 219 Dundee Will Locust St 99E ame tte Knights Bridge Rd Ri ver Arndt Rd Canby Spangler Rd Beaver Creek Rd Mola Champoeg Rd lla R iv er Aurora 211 St. Paul French Prairie Rd r e v 99E i R Meridian Rd g n i d d 219 u P 213 211 214 Molalla 211 Woodburn Molalla Forest Rd 99W Salem 22 Dallas Commercial Rd River Rd Falls City Independence Monmouth 51 Liberty Rd Monmouth Hwy 99W er 223 Riv ette er m iv a te R ll Luckiamu i Buena Vista Rd Corvallis Rd W Buena Vista Ferry Maple Grove Rd Talbot Rd Pedee Airlie Airlie Rd Buena Vista Rd Kings Valley Maxfi eld Creek Rd Springhill Dr Camp Adair Rd Hoskins 20 Kings Valley HwyKings Valley Albany 223 99W ABlodgettLSEA20 FALLS LOOP Walnut Blvd Wren 34 20 Corvallis L3 L2 st 53rd Tangent Philomath A1 A2 e r v 34 R i Marys A10 Marys Peak Rd 99W A9 99E Decker Rd A3 Greenberry r Peoria Rd 34 e v i R e t t A4 e m a l l A8 i Bellfountain Rd W ▲ To Waldport A5 Alsea Bruce Rd 34 Bellfountain South Fork Rd A7 Alpine 99W Subject A6 to winter closure Monroe Alpine Rd he broad shoulders of Marys Peak, the highest point in the Oregon Coast range, form the backdrop for A1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 | Page MARYS PEAK to PACIFIC Corridor Management Plan for ODOT Scenic Byway Application
    1 | Page MARYS PEAK TO PACIFIC Corridor Management Plan for ODOT Scenic Byway Application A cooperative project sponsored by: Lincoln County, Oregon City of Waldport, Oregon 225 West Olive Street P.O. Box 1120 Newport, Oregon 97365 Waldport, OR 97394 Cover Art by Commissioner Anne Schuster, Benton County 2 | Page LIST OF PARTNERS • Benton County, Oregon • Cascades West Economic Development District • City of Corvallis, Oregon • City of Philomath, Oregon • City of Tangent, Oregon • City of Waldport, Oregon • Community of Alsea, Oregon • Corvallis Area Metropolitan Planning Organization • Economic Development Alliance of Lincoln County, Oregon • Lincoln County, Oregon • Linn County, Oregon • Oregon Cascades West Council of Governments • Oregon Coast Visitors Association • Oregon Department of Transportation • Oregon State University • Port of Alsea, Oregon • Siuslaw National Forrest, United States Forest Service • Travel Oregon • United States Bureau of Land Management • Visit Corvallis • Willamette Valley Visitors Association 3 | Page JANUARY 2016 4 | Page CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 7 Route Description ................................................................................................................... 8 Description of Qualities ........................................................................................................... 9 Management Plan .................................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]