MAKING the CASE for CONFORMAL GRAVITY Arxiv

Home , Conformal gravity, NGC 4183, NGC 4217, NGC 4395

MAKING THE CASE FOR CONFORMAL GRAVITY

arXiv:1101.2186 [gr-qc], Foundations of Physics, in press

Philip D. Mannheim

University of Connecticut

Seminar at Miami 2011, Fort Lauderdale December 2011

1 GHOST PROBLEM AND UNITARITY 1. C. M. Bender and P. D. Mannheim, No-ghost theorem for the fourth-order derivative Pais-Uhlenbeck oscillator model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 110402 (2008). (0706.0207 [hep-th]). 2. P. D. Mannheim, Conformal gravity challenges string theory, Pascos-07, July 2007 (0707.2283 [hep-th]). 3. C. M. Bender and P. D. Mannheim, Giving up the ghost, Jour. Phys. A 41, 304018 (2008). (0807.2607 [hep-th]) 4. C. M. Bender and P. D. Mannheim, Exactly solvable PT-symmetric Hamiltonian having no Hermitian counterpart, Phys. Rev. D 78, 025022 (2008). (0804.4190 [hep-th]) PT QUANTUM MECHANICS 5. C. M. Bender and P. D. Mannheim, PT symmetry and necessary and suﬃcient conditions for the reality of energy eigenvalues, Phys. Lett. A 374, 1616 (2010). (0902.1365 [hep-th]) 6. P. D. Mannheim, PT symmetry as a necessary and suﬃcient condition for unitary time evolution, 0912.2635 [hep-th], December 2009. 7. C. M. Bender and P. D. Mannheim, PT symmetry in relativistic quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. D 84, 105038 (2011). (1107.0501 [hep-th]), July 2011 PAIS-UHLENBECK FOURTH-ORDER OSCILLATOR 8. P. D. Mannheim and A. Davidson, Fourth order theories without ghosts, January 2000 (hep-th/0001115). 9. P. D. Mannheim and A. Davidson, Dirac quantization of the Pais-Uhlenbeck fourth order oscillator, Phys. Rev. A 71, 042110 (2005). (hep- th/0408104). 10. P. D. Mannheim, Solution to the ghost problem in fourth order derivative theories, Found. Phys. 37, 532 (2007). (hep-th/0608154). CONFORMAL GRAVITY AND THE COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT AND DARK MATTER PROBLEMS 11. P. D. Mannheim, Alternatives to dark matter and dark energy, Prog. Part. Nuc. Phys. 56, 340 (2006). (astro-ph/0505266). 12. P. D. Mannheim, Dynamical symmetry breaking and the cosmological constant problem, September 2008 (0809.1200 [hep-th]). Proceedings of ICHEP08, eConf C080730. 13. P. D. Mannheim, Comprehensive solution to the cosmological constant, zero-point energy, and quantum gravity problems, Gen. Rel. Gravit. 43, 703 (2011). (0909.0212 [hep-th]) 14. P. D. Mannheim, Intrinsically quantum-mechanical gravity and the cosmological constant problem, May 2010, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 26, 2375 (2011). (arXiv:1005.5108 [hep-th]). 15. P. D. Mannheim and J. G. O’Brien, Impact of a global quadratic potential on galactic rotation curves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 121101 (2011), (arXiv:1007.0970 [astro-ph.CO]). 16. P. D. Mannheim and J. G. O’Brien, Fitting galactic rotation curves with conformal gravity and a global quadratic potential, November 2010. (arXiv: 1011.3495 [astro-ph.CO]) 17. P. D. Mannheim, Making the case for conformal gravity, January 2011, Found. Phys., in press. (arXiv: 1101.2186 [hep-th]). 18. J. G. O’Brien and P. D. Mannheim, Fitting dwarf galaxy rotation curves with conformal gravity, July 2011. MNRAS, in press (arXiv:1107.5229 [astro-ph.CO]) 19. P. D. Mannheim, Cosmological perturbations in conformal gravity, September 2011. (arXiv:1109.4119 [gr-qc])

2 1 Einstein gravity: what must be kept 1 Γµ = gµλ [∂ g + ∂ g − ∂ g ] , (1) νσ 2 ν λσ σ λν λ νσ

2 µ ν ds = gµν(x)dx dx (2)

d2xµ dxν dxσ +Γµ =0. (3) ds2 νσ ds ds

∂Γλ ∂Γλ Rλ = µν +Γλ Γη − µκ − Γλ Γη . (4) µνκ ∂xκ κη µν ∂xν νη µκ

ds2 = −B(r)dt2 + A(r)dr2 + r2dθ2 + r2 sin2 θdφ2, (5)

B(r) = A−1(r)=1 − 2β/r, β = MG/c2, (6)

3 2 Einstein gravity: what could be changed

1 µν 1 µν α µν − R − g R α = TM , (7) 8πG  2  1 I = I + I = − d4x(−g)1/2Rα + I . (8) UNIV EH M 16πG Z α M

4 1/2 λµνκ IUNIV = IW + IM = −αg Z d x(−g) CλµνκC + IM 4 1/2 µν 1 α 2 2α(x)   ≡ −2αg Z d x(−g) R Rµν − (R α) + IM, gµν(x) → e gµν(x) (9)  3 

1 1 C = R + Rα [g g − g g ] − [g R − g R − g R + g R ] , λµνκ λµνκ 6 α λν µκ λκ µν 2 λν µκ λκ µν µν λκ µκ λν 2α(x) Cλµνκ → e Cλµνκ (10)

µν µν − 4αgW + TM =0, (11)

1 W µν = gµν(Rα );β + Rµν;β − Rµβ;ν − Rνβ;µ − 2RµβRν 2 α ;β ;β ;β ;β β 1 2 2 2 1 + gµνR Rαβ − gµν(Rα );β + (Rα );µ;ν + Rα Rµν − gµν(Rα )2, (12) 2 αβ 3 α ;β 3 α 3 α 6 α

Wµν =0 if Rµν =0

4 3 Conformal gravity: an ab initio approach

4 ¯ µ iβ(x) IM = − Z d xψ(x)γ [i∂µ + Aµ(x)]ψ(x), ψ(x) → e ψ(x), Aµ(x) → Aµ(x) + ∂µβ(x) (13)

4 1/2 ¯ µ 2α(x) −3α(x)/2 IM = − Z d x(−g) ψ(x)γ (x)[i∂µ + iΓµ(x)]ψ(x), gµν(x) → e gµν(x), ψ(x) → e ψ(x),

µν µ ν µ µ a ν ν σ g (x) = Va (x)Va (x), γ (x) = Va (x)ˆγ , Γµ(x)=([γ (x), ∂µγν(x)] − [γ (x),γσ(x)]Γµν)/8. (14) Xa

4 1/2 ¯ µ IM = − Z d x(−g) ψ(x)γ (x)[i∂µ + iΓµ(x) + Aµ(x)]ψ(x), −3α(x)/2+iβ(x) µ −α(x) µ ψ(x) → e ψ(x), Va (x) → e Va (x), full SO(4, 2) ≡ SU(2, 2) invariance (15)

µ 4 1/2 1 µν 1 α 2 1 µν   IEFF = Tr ln[γ (x)[i∂µ + iΓµ(x) + Aµ(x)]] = Z d x(−g) C [R Rµν − (R α) ] + FµνF , 20 3 3  1 C = (16) 8π2(4 − D)

4 1/2 ¯ µ IM = − Z d x(−g) ψ(x)γ (x)[i∂µ + iΓµ(x) + Aµ(x) + M(x)]ψ(x). (17)

4 1/2 4 1 2 α µ ν   IMF = Z d x(−g) C −M (x) + M (x)R α − gµν∂ M(x)∂ M(x) . (18)  6 

1 I = d4x(−g)1/2C − M 4(x) + M 2(x)Rα − g (∂µ + iAµ(x))M(x)(∂ν − iAν(x))M(x) . (19) MF Z 6 α µν

5 4 Quantization of gravity through coupling

If all mass and length scales come from symmetry breaking, then all scales come from quantum mechanics. SPACETIME CURVATURE IS INTRINSICALLY QUANTUM-MECHANICAL. Thus expand gravity as a power series in h¯ and not as a power series in gravitational µν coupling constant. Once quantum-mechanical matter source TM is non-zero, gravity then quantized by its coupling to matter source, since stationarity with respect to metric yields:

µν µν µν TUNIV = TGRAV + TM =0. (20)

6 5 Unitarity via P T symmetry 1 1 gµν = ηµν + hµν,W µν(1) = (∂ ∂α)2Kµν,Kµν = hµν − ηµνη hαβ (21) 2 α 4 αβ α I (2) = − g d4x∂ ∂αK ∂ ∂βKµν, (22) W 2 Z α µν β 1 I = − d4x ∂ ∂ φ∂µ∂νφ +(M 2 + M 2)∂ φ∂µφ + M 2M 2φ2 . (23) S 2 Z µ ν 1 2 µ 1 2

2 ¯ 2 2 2 ¯ 2 2 (−∂t + ∇ − M1 )(−∂t + ∇ − M2 )φ(x)=0, (24)

1 1 1   D(k,M1,M2) = 2 2 2 2 − 2 2 , (25) (M2 − M1 ) k + M1 k + M2  1 T (M ,M ) = π φ˙ + π2 +(M 2 + M 2)(φ˙2 − ∂ φ∂iφ) − M 2M 2φ2 − π πij , (26) 00 1 2 0 2 00 1 2 i 1 2 ij

∂L ∂L ∂L µ   2 2 µ µ λ µλ µ λ π = − ∂λ = −(M1 + M2 )∂ φ + ∂λ∂ ∂ φ, π = = −∂ ∂ φ. (27) ∂φ,µ ∂φ,µ,λ  ∂φ,µ,λ   Solution : φ† = −φ, H not Hermitian, VHV −1 = H†. (28) H|Ri = E|Ri, hR|H† = hR|E, hL|H = hL|E, hL| = hR|V (29)

hL(t)|R(t)i = hL(t = 0)|eiHte−iHt|R(t = 0)i = hL(t = 0)|R(t = 0)i. (30)

7 6 The zero-point problem

µν µν µν µν µν µν † G = −8πGTM , G = −8πGhTM i, G = −8πGhTM iFIN, H = (a a +1/2)¯hω (31) X

µν µν µν µν (TGRAV)DIV +(TM )DIV =0, (TGRAV)FIN +(TM )FIN =0. (32)

µ ν 2¯h ∞ k k T µν = ih¯ψγ¯ µ∂νψ, hΩ|T µν|Ωi = − d3k , (33) M M 3 Z−∞ (2π) ωk

µν µ ν µν hΩ|TM |Ωi =(ρM + pM)U U + pMη , (34)

zero-point energy density and pressure, pM = ρM/3, so NOT cosmological constant

1/2 2 3 h¯ d k (i) ¯ (i) ¯ ik·x (i) ¯ (i) ¯ ik·x Kµν(x) = 1/2 Z 3/2 3/2 A (k)ǫµν(k)e + iωkB (k)ǫµν(k)(n · x)e 2(−αg) iX=1 (2π) (ωk) ˆ(i) ¯ (i) ¯ −ik·x ˆ(i) ¯ (i) ¯ −ik·x + A (k)ǫµν(k)e − iωkB (k)ǫµν(k)(n · x)e , (35)

(i) (j) ′ (i) (j) ′ 3 ′ [A (k¯), Bˆ (k¯ )]=[B (k¯), Aˆ (k¯ )] = Z(k)δi,jδ (k¯ − k¯ ), [A(i)(k¯), Aˆ(j)(k¯′)]=0, [B(i)(k¯), Bˆ(j)(k¯′)]=0, [A(i)(k¯),B(j)(k¯′)]=0, [Aˆ(i)(k¯), Bˆ(j)(k¯′)]=0. (36)

µ ν 2¯h ∞ Z(k)k k − 4α hΩ|W µν(2)|Ωi = d3k , Z(k)=1 (37) g 3 Z−∞ (2π) ωk

8 Einstein gravity in D =2

dk 1/2 i(kx−ωkt) −i(kx−ωkt) h00(x,t) = κ2h¯ Z 1/2 1/2 A(k)e + C(k)e (2π) (2ωk) = h11(x,t), dk 1/2 i(kx−ωkt) −i(kx−ωkt) h01(x,t) = κ2h¯ Z 1/2 1/2 B(k)e + D(k)e . (2π) (2ωk) (38)

k[fBC(k) − fAD(k)]=4ωk =4|k|, (40)

9 7 The cosmological constant problem in D =2

µ ν h¯ ∞ k k hS|ih¯ψγ¯ µ∂νψ|Si = − dk . (42) Z−∞ 2π ωk

h¯ m2 m2 4¯h2K2 h¯ m2 m2 4¯h2K2  2    2   ρMF = − K + 2 + 2 ln 2 , pMF = − K + 2 − 2 ln 2 , (43) 2π  2¯h 2¯h  m  2π  2¯h 2¯h  m        m2 4¯h2K2   ΛMF = ln 2 , (44) 4πh¯  m   

µν µ ν µν µν hS|TMF|Si =(ρMF + pMF)U U + pMFη − ΛMFη , pMF − ρMF − 2ΛMF =0. (45)

(ρ + p ) hS|T µν |Si = MF MF [2U µU ν + ηµν] , MF 2 ρ + p h¯ m2 MF MF 00  2  = hS|TMF|Si = − K + 2 , (46) 2 2π  2¯h    m2  2 2 2 1/2  k[fBC(k) − fAD(k)]=4 (k + m /h¯ ) − 2 2 2 2 1/2 . (47)  2¯h (k + m /h¯ )   

10 8 The cosmological constant problem in D =4

h¯ m2K2 m4 4¯h2K2 m4  4    ǫ(m, 4F) = − 2 K + 2 − 4 ln 2 + 4 , (48) 4π  h¯ 4¯h  m  8¯h     

˜ 2 2 γψψ¯ /2 Γψψ¯ (p,p, 0)=(−p /m ) , γψψ¯ = −1, dψψ¯ = 3 + γψψ¯ =2 (49)

i d4p −p2 −1/2 hK¯ 4 m2M 2 m2M 2  µ        ǫ(m) = Z TrLn γ pµ − m + iǫ = − + 3 ln 4 − 1 . (50) 4  2  2 2 4 h¯ (2π)   M   4π 16π h¯  16¯h K           m2 hK¯ 4 m2M 2 m2 M 2 hK¯ 4 M 4     ǫ(m) − = − 2 + 2 3 ln 2 − 1 , ǫ(M) − = − 2 − 2 3 , (51) 2g 4π 16π h¯  M   2g 4π 16π h¯     2 m 2¯h ∞ mM ǫ(m) − = − d3k (k2 + mM/h¯2)1/2 − 2g (2π)3 Z−∞ 4¯h2(k2 + mM/h¯2)1/2 mM + (k2 − mM/h¯2)1/2 + . (52) 4¯h2(k2 − mMh¯2)1/2

2 2 M 2¯h ∞ M ǫ(M) − = − d3k (k2 + M 2/h¯2)1/2 − 2g (2π)3 Z−∞ 4¯h2(k2 + M 2/h¯2)1/2 M 2 + (k2 − M 2/h¯2)1/2 + . (53) 4¯h2(k2 − M 2/h¯2)1/2

M 2 M 2 kZ(k)=(k2 + M 2/h¯2)1/2 − +(k2 − M 2/h¯2)1/2 + , (54) 4¯h2(k2 + M 2/h¯2)1/2 4¯h2(k2 − M 2/h¯2)1/2

11 24

20 apparent magnitude apparent

14 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 redshift

Figure 1: The q0 = −0.37 conformal gravity ﬁt (upper curve) and the ΩM (t0)=0.3, ΩΛ(t0)=0.7 standard model ﬁt (lower curve) to the z < 1 supernovae Hubble plot data. 12 30

22 apparent magnitude apparent 20

14 0 1 2 3 4 5 redshift

Figure 2: Hubble plot expectations for q0 = −0.37 (highest curve) and q0 =0 (middle curve) conformal gravity and for ΩM (t0)=0.3, ΩΛ(t0)=0.7 standard gravity (lowest curve). 13 9 The dark matter problem

dr2 ds2 = −B(r)dt2 + + r2dΩ , (55) B(r) 2

′′′ ′′′′ 3 0 r 4 ′′′′ 4B (rB) 3 0 r (W 0 − W r) = ∇ B = B + = = (T 0 − T r) ≡ f(r) (56) B(r) r r 4αgB(r)

2β B(r > r )=1 − + γr, (57) 0 r

1 r0 1 r0 2β = dr′r′4f(r′), γ = − dr′r′2f(r′). (58) 6 Z0 2 Z0

β∗c2 γ∗c2r V ∗(r) = − + (59) r 2

2 ∗ ∗ 2 ∗ ∗ 2 vLOC N β c R R R R R N γ c R R R              = 3 I0 K0 − I1 K1 + I1 K1 . (60) R 2R0  2R0  2R0  2R0  2R0  2R0 2R0  2R0 

1 r ∞ dφ(r) 1 r φ(r) = − dr′r′2g(r′) − dr′r′g(r′), = dr′r′2g(r′). (61) r Z0 Zr dr r2 Z0 Newtonian Gravity is LOCAL

2 r r 1 r 1 ∞ r ∞ φ(r) = − dr′r′2h(r′) − dr′r′4h(r′) − dr′r′3h(r′) − dr′r′h(r′) (62) 2 Z0 6r Z0 2 Zr 6 Zr 14 dφ(r) 1 r 1 r r ∞ = − dr′r′2h(r′) + dr′r′4h(r′) − dr′r′h(r′). (63) dr 2 Z0 6r2 Z0 3 Zr Conformal Gravity is GLOBAL. So cannot ignore the rest of the universe. Rest of universe has homogeneous Hubble ﬂow and inhomogeneous clusters of galaxies.

4r ρ = 1/2 , τ = Z dtR(t) (64) 2(1 + γ0r) + 2 + γ0r

dr2 1 1 + γ ρ/4 2 R2(τ) 2 2 2  0   2 2 2 2  − (1 + γ0r)c dt + + r dΩ2 = 2 −c dτ + 2 2 2 dρ + ρ dΩ2 (65) (1 + γ0r) R (τ) 1 − γ0ρ/4  [1 − γ ρ /16]     0 

v2 v2 γ c2 TOT = LOC + 0 . (66) R R 2

∗ −41 −1 −30 −1 γ =5.42 × 10 cm , γ0 =3.06 × 10 cm . (67)

v2 v2 γ c2 v2 N ∗β∗c2 N ∗γ∗c2 γ c2 TOT = LOC + 0 − κc2R, TOT → + + 0 − κc2R, (68) R R 2 R R2 2 2

κ =9.54 × 10−54 cm−2 ≈ (100 Mpc)−2. (69)

∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ Fit 138 galaxies with VISIBLE N of each galaxy as only variable, β , γ , γ0 and κ are all universal, and with NO DARK MATTER, and with 276 fewer free parameters than in 2 2 −30 −1 dark matter calculations. Works since (v /c R)last ∼ 10 cm for every galaxy.

15 70 100 140 150 60 120 80 50 100 100 40 60 80

30 40 60 50 20 40 20 10 20 DDO 154 IC 2574 NGC 925 NGC 2403 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 5 10 15 20

300 100 250 200

250 80 200 150 200 60 150

150 100 40 100 100 50 20 50 50 NGC 2841 NGC 2903 NGC 2976 NGC 3031 0 0 0 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 250 200 150 150 200

150 150 100 100

100 100 50 50 50 50

NGC 3198 NGC 3521 NGC 3621 NGC 3627 0 0 0 0 0 10 20 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 2 4 6 8 200 250 200 200 150 200 150 150 150 100 100 100 100

50 50 50 50

NGC 4736 NGC 4826 NGC 5055 NGC 6946 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 5 10 15 0 10 20 30 40 0 5 10 15 20 140

250 120

200 100

80 150 60 100 40 50 20 NGC 7331 NGC 7793 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 FIG. 1: Fitting to the rotational velocities (in km sec−1) of the THINGS 18 galaxy sample

16 140 200 120 150

150 100

80 100 100 60

40 50 50 20 NGC 3726 NGC 3769 NGC 3877 0 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 2 4 6 8 10 200 150

150 150 100 100 100

50 50 50

NGC 3893 NGC 3917 NGC 3949 0 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 250 140 250 200 120

100 200 150 80 150

100 60 100 40 50 50 20 NGC 3953 NGC 3972 NGC 3992 0 0 0 0 5 10 15 0 2 4 6 8 0 10 20 30 40 50

140 200 120 150

100 150 80 100

60 100

40 50 50 20 NGC 4010 NGC 4013 NGC 4051 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 2 4 6 8 10 200 150 200

150 150 100

100 100

50 50 50

NGC 4085 NGC 4088 NGC 4100 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15 20 25 FIG. 2: Fitting to the rotational velocities of the Ursa Major 30 galaxy sample – Part 1

17 140 200 200 120

150 150 100

80 100 100 60

40 50 50 20 NGC 4138 NGC 4157 NGC 4183 0 0 0 0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 200 120 100

100 150 80 80 60 100 60 40 40 50 20 20 NGC 4217 NGC 4389 UGC 6399 0 0 0 0 5 10 15 0 1 2 3 4 0 2 4 6 8 100 100 80 80 80 60 60 60 40 40 40

20 20 20 UGC 6446 UGC 6667 UGC 6818 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 100 120 120

100 80 100

80 60 80

60 60 40 40 40 20 20 20 UGC 6917 UGC 6923 UGC 6930 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 5 10 15 100 120 200 100 80

150 80 60

100 60 40 40 50 20 20 UGC 6973 UGC 6983 UGC 7089 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 5 10 15 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 FIG. 3: Fitting to the rotational velocities of the Ursa Major 30 galaxy sample – Part 2

18 80 120 120 120 100 100 100 60 80 80 80

60 40 60 60

40 40 40 20 20 20 20 DDO 64 F 563 -1 F 563 -V2 F 568 -3 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0 5 10 15 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 2 4 6 8 10 50 100 100 80 80 40 80 60 60 30 60 40 20 40 40

20 20 20 10 F 583 -1 F 583 -4 NGC 959 NGC 4395 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 120 140 120 80 120 100 100

60 100 80 80 80 60 40 60 60 40 40 40 20 20 20 20 NGC 7137 UGC 128 UGC 191 UGC 477 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 120 50 100 120 100 40 80 100 80 30 60 80 60 60 20 40 40 40 10 20 20 20 UGC 1230 UGC 1281 UGC 1551 UGC 4325 0 0 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 120 120 80 100 150 100

80 60 80 100 60 60 40

40 40 50 20 20 20 UGC 5005 UGC 5750 UGC 5999 UGC 11820 0 0 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 FIG. 4: Fitting to the rotational velocities of the LSB 20 galaxy sample

19 50 60

300 80 50 40 250 60 40 200 30 30 150 40 20 20 100 20 10 50 10 ESO 140040 ESO 840411 ESO 1200211 ESO 1870510 0 0 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 2 4 6 8 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 70 140 100 60 120 150

100 80 50

40 80 60 100

60 30 40 40 20 50 20 20 10 ESO 2060140 ESO 3020120 ESO 3050090 ESO 4250180 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 120 150 140 150 100 120

100 80 100 100 80 60 60 40 50 50 40 20 20 ESO 4880490 F 571 - 08 F 579 -V1 F 730 - V1 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 60 250 100 150 50 200 80 40 150 100 60 30

100 40 20 50

10 50 20 UGC 4115 UGC 6614 UGC 11454 UGC 11557 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 60 150 150 250 50 200 40 100 100 150 30

100 20 50 50

10 50 UGC 11583 UGC 11616 UGC 11648 UGC 11748 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 5 10 15 20

150

100

UGC 11819 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 FIG. 5: Fitting to the rotational velocities20 of the LSB 21 galaxy sample 80 80 120 100

100 60 80 60 80 60 40 40 60 40 40 20 20 20 20 DDO 168 DDO 170 M 33 NGC 55 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 120 140 120 250 100 120 100 200 100 80 80 80 150 60 60 60 100 40 40 40 50 20 20 20 NGC 247 NGC 300 NGC 801 NGC 1003 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 10 20 30 40 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 100 250 250 80 80 200 200 60 60 150 150 40 40 100 100

20 20 50 50

NGC 1560 NGC 2683 NGC 2998 NGC 3109 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 10 20 30 40 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

300 350 100 250 250 300 80 200 250 200

150 200 60 150 150 40 100 100 100 50 20 50 50 NGC 5033 NGC 5371 NGC 5533 NGC 5585 0 0 0 0 0 10 20 30 40 0 10 20 30 40 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

300 350 140 100 250 120 300 80 250 200 100 80 200 60 150 60 150 40 100 40 100 20 50 20 50 NGC 5907 NGC 6503 NGC 6674 UGC 2259 0 0 0 0 0 10 20 30 40 0 5 10 15 20 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 2 4 6

350 300 300 250 250 200 200 150 150

100 100

50 50 UGC 2885 Malin 1 0 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 20 40 60 80 100 FIG. 6: Fitting to the rotational velocities21 of the Miscellaneous 22 galaxy sample 140 120

80 120 100

100 80 60

80 60 40 60

40 40 20 20 20 F 568-V1 F 574-1 UGC 731

0 0 0 0 5 10 15 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 120

100 80

100

60 80

60 60 40

40 40

20 20 20

UGC 3371 UGC 4173 UGC 4325

0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

80 100

80 60 60

40 40 40

20 20 20

UGC 4499 UGC 5414 UGC 5721

0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 0 1 2 3 4 0 2 4 6 8

100 60 100

50 80 80

40 60 60 30

40 40 20

20 20 10

UGC 5750 UGC 7232 UGC 7323

0 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0 1 2 3 4 5

−1 FIG. 7: Fitting to the rotational velocities (in km22 sec ) of the 24 dwarf galaxy sample – Part 1 100 50 120

100 80 40

80 60 30

60 40 20

20 10 20

UGC 7399 UGC 7524 UGC 7559

0 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 2 4 6 8 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 40 80 100

80 30 60

20 40

10 20 20

UGC 7577 UGC 7603 UGC 8490

0 0 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 10

120

100 150

60 80

100 60 40

40 50 20 20

UGC 9211 UGC 11707 UGC 11861

0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 0 5 10 15 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12

100 120

100 80

60 80 60

60 40 40 40

20 20 20

UGC 12060 UGC 12632 UGC 12732

0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

FIG. 8: Fitting to the rotational velocities23 of the 24 dwarf galaxy sample – Part 2 60 50

50 40

60 40 30

30 40 20 20

20 10 10

UGC 3851 UGC 4305 UGC 4459

0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 1 2 3 4 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 60 60 100

50 50 80

40 40 60

30 30

40 20 20

20 10 10

UGC 5139 UGC 5423 UGC 5666

0 0 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 FIG. 9 Fitting to the rotational velocities of the 6 dwarf galaxy sample

100 140 300 80 120 250 100 60 200 80 150 40 60

40 100 20 20 50 DDO 154 UGC 128 Malin 1 0 0 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 20 40 60 80 0 50 100 150 FIG. 10: Extended distance predictions for DDO 154, UGC 128, and Malin 1

24 Properties of the THINGS 18 Galaxy Sample 2 2 Galaxy Type Distance LB R0 Rlast MHI Mdisk (M/L)stars (v /c R)last Data Sources 10 10 10 −30 −1 (Mpc) (10 L⊙) (kpc) (kpc) (10 M⊙) (10 M⊙) (M⊙/L⊙) (10 cm ) v L R0 HI DDO 0154 LSB 4.2 0.007 0.8 8.1 0.03 0.003 0.45 1.12 [?][?][?][?] IC 2574 LSB 4.5 0.345 4.2 13.1 0.19 0.098 0.28 1.69 [?][?][?][?] NGC 0925 LSB 8.7 1.444 3.9 12.4 0.41 1.372 0.95 4.17 [?][?][?][?] NGC 2403 HSB 4.3 1.647 2.7 23.9 0.46 2.370 1.44 2.89 [?][?][?][?] NGC 2841 HSB 14.1 4.742 3.5 51.6 0.86 19.552 4.12 5.83 [?][?][?][?] NGC 2903 HSB 9.4 4.088 3.0 30.9 0.49 7.155 1.75 3.75 [?][?][?][?] NGC 2976 LSB 3.6 0.201 1.2 2.6 0.01 0.322 1.60 10.43 [?][?][?][?] NGC 3031 HSB 3.7 3.187 2.6 15.0 0.38 8.662 2.72 9.31 [?][?][?][?] NGC 3198 HSB 14.1 3.241 4.0 38.6 1.06 3.644 1.12 2.09 [?][?][?][?] NGC 3521 HSB 12.2 4.769 3.3 35.3 1.03 9.245 1.94 4.21 [?][?][?][?] NGC 3621 HSB 7.4 2.048 2.9 28.7 0.89 2.891 1.41 3.18 [?][?][?][?] NGC 3627 HSB 10.2 3.700 3.1 8.2 0.10 6.622 1.79 15.64 [?][?][?][?] NGC 4736 HSB 5.0 1.460 2.1 10.3 0.05 1.630 1.60 4.66 [?][?][?][?] NGC 4826 HSB 5.4 1.441 2.6 15.8 0.03 3.640 2.53 5.46 [?][?][?][?] NGC 5055 HSB 9.2 3.622 2.9 44.4 0.76 6.035 1.87 2.36 [?][?][?][?] NGC 6946 HSB 6.9 3.732 2.9 22.4 0.57 6.272 1.68 6.39 [?][?][?][?] NGC 7331 HSB 14.2 6.773 3.2 24.4 0.85 12.086 1.78 9.61 [?][?][?][?] NGC 7793 HSB 5.2 0.910 1.7 10.3 0.16 0.793 0.87 3.61 [?][?][?][?]

25 Properties of the Ursa Major 30 Galaxy Sample 2 2 Galaxy Type Distance LB R0 Rlast MHI Mdisk (M/L)stars (v /c R)last Data Sources 10 10 10 −30 −1 (Mpc) (10 L⊙) (kpc) (kpc) (10 M⊙) (10 M⊙) (M⊙/L⊙) (10 cm ) v L R0 HI NGC 3726 HSB 17.4 3.340 3.2 31.5 0.60 3.82 1.15 3.19 [?][?][?][?] NGC 3769 HSB 15.5 0.684 1.5 32.2 0.41 1.36 1.99 1.43 [?][?][?][?] NGC 3877 HSB 15.5 1.948 2.4 9.8 0.11 3.44 1.76 10.51 [?][?][?][?] NGC 3893 HSB 18.1 2.928 2.4 20.5 0.59 5.00 1.71 3.85 [?][?][?][?] NGC 3917 LSB 16.9 1.334 2.8 13.9 0.17 2.23 1.67 4.85 [?][?][?][?] NGC 3949 HSB 18.4 2.327 1.7 7.2 0.35 2.37 1.02 14.23 [?][?][?][?] NGC 3953 HSB 18.7 4.236 3.9 16.3 0.31 9.79 2.31 10.20 [?][?][?][?] NGC 3972 HSB 18.6 0.978 2.0 9.0 0.13 1.49 1.53 7.18 [?][?][?][?] NGC 3992 HSB 25.6 8.456 5.7 49.6 1.94 13.94 1.65 4.08 [?][?][?][?] NGC 4010 LSB 18.4 0.883 3.4 10.6 0.29 2.03 2.30 5.03 [?][?][?][?] NGC 4013 HSB 18.6 2.088 2.1 33.1 0.32 5.58 2.67 3.14 [?][?][?][?] NGC 4051 HSB 14.6 2.281 2.3 9.9 0.18 3.17 1.39 8.52 [?][?][?][?] NGC 4085 HSB 19.0 1.212 1.6 6.5 0.15 1.34 1.11 10.21 [?][?][?][?] NGC 4088 HSB 15.8 2.957 2.8 18.8 0.64 4.67 1.58 5.79 [?][?][?][?] NGC 4100 HSB 21.4 3.388 2.9 27.1 0.44 5.74 1.69 3.35 [?][?][?][?] NGC 4138 LSB 15.6 0.827 1.2 16.1 0.11 2.97 3.59 5.04 [?][?][?][?] NGC 4157 HSB 18.7 2.901 2.6 30.9 0.88 5.83 2.01 3.99 [?][?][?][?] NGC 4183 HSB 16.7 1.042 2.9 19.5 0.30 1.43 1.38 2.36 [?][?][?][?] NGC 4217 HSB 19.6 3.031 3.1 18.2 0.30 5.53 1.83 6.28 [?][?][?][?] NGC 4389 HSB 15.5 0.610 1.2 4.6 0.04 0.42 0.68 9.49 [?][?][?][?] UGC 6399 LSB 18.7 0.291 2.4 8.1 0.07 0.59 2.04 3.42 [?][?][?][?] UGC 6446 LSB 15.9 0.263 1.9 13.6 0.24 0.36 1.36 1.70 [?][?][?][?] UGC 6667 LSB 19.8 0.422 3.1 8.6 0.10 0.71 1.67 3.09 [?][?][?][?] UGC 6818 LSB 21.7 0.352 2.1 8.4 0.16 0.11 0.33 2.35 [?][?][?][?] UGC 6917 LSB 18.9 0.563 2.9 10.9 0.22 1.24 2.20 4.05 [?][?][?][?] UGC 6923 LSB 18.0 0.297 1.5 5.3 0.08 0.35 1.18 4.43 [?][?][?][?] UGC 6930 LSB 17.0 0.601 2.2 15.7 0.29 1.02 1.69 2.68 [?][?][?][?] UGC 6973 HSB 25.3 1.647 2.2 11.0 0.35 3.99 2.42 10.58 [?][?][?][?] UGC 6983 LSB 20.2 0.577 2.9 17.6 0.37 1.28 2.22 2.43 [?][?][?][?] UGC 7089 LSB 13.9 0.352 2.3 7.1 0.07 0.35 0.98 3.18 [?][?][?][?]

26 Properties of the LSB 20 Galaxy Sample 2 2 Galaxy Type Distance LB R0 Rlast MHI Mdisk (M/L)stars (v /c R)last Data Sources 10 10 10 −30 −1 (Mpc) (10 L⊙) (kpc) (kpc) (10 M⊙) (10 M⊙) (M⊙/L⊙) (10 cm ) v L R0 HI DDO 0064 LSB 6.8 0.015 1.3 2.1 0.02 0.04 2.87 6.05 [?][?][?][?] F563-1 LSB 46.8 0.140 2.9 18.2 0.29 1.35 9.65 2.44 [?][?][?][?] F563-V2 LSB 57.8 0.266 2.0 6.3 0.20 0.60 2.26 6.15 [?][?][?][?] F568-3 LSB 80.0 0.351 4.2 11.6 0.30 1.20 3.43 3.16 [?][?][?][?] F583-1 LSB 32.4 0.064 1.6 14.1 0.18 0.15 2.32 1.92 [?][?][?][?] F583-4 LSB 50.8 0.096 2.8 7.0 0.06 0.31 3.25 2.52 [?][?][?][?] NGC 0959 LSB 13.5 0.333 1.3 2.9 0.05 0.37 1.11 7.43 [?][?][?][?] NGC 4395 LSB 4.1 0.374 2.7 0.9 0.13 0.83 2.21 2.29 [?][?][?][?] NGC 7137 LSB 25.0 0.959 1.7 3.6 0.10 0.27 0.28 3.91 [?][?] ES [?] UGC 0128 LSB 64.6 0.597 6.9 54.8 0.73 2.75 4.60 1.03 [?][?][?][?] UGC 0191 LSB 15.9 0.129 1.7 2.2 0.26 0.49 3.81 15.48 [?][?][?][?] UGC 0477 LSB 35.8 0.871 3.5 10.2 1.02 1.00 1.14 4.42 [?][?] ES [?] UGC 1230 LSB 54.1 0.366 4.7 37.1 0.65 0.67 1.82 0.97 [?][?][?][?] UGC 1281 LSB 5.1 0.017 1.6 1.7 0.03 0.01 0.53 3.02 [?][?][?][?] UGC 1551 LSB 35.6 0.780 4.2 6.6 0.44 0.16 0.20 3.69 [?][?][?][?] UGC 4325 LSB 11.9 0.373 1.9 3.4 0.10 0.40 1.08 7.39 [?][?][?][?] UGC 5005 LSB 51.4 0.200 4.6 27.7 0.28 1.02 5.11 1.30 [?][?][?][?] UGC 5750 LSB 56.1 0.472 3.3 8.6 0.10 0.10 0.21 1.58 [?][?][?][?] UGC 5999 LSB 44.9 0.170 4.4 15.0 0.18 3.36 19.81 5.79 [?][?][?][?] UGC 11820 LSB 17.1 0.169 3.6 3.7 0.40 1.68 9.95 8.44 [?][?][?][?]

27 Properties of the LSB 21 Galaxy Sample 2 2 Galaxy Type Distance LB R0 Rlast MHI Mdisk (M/L)stars (v /c R)last Data Sources 10 10 10 −30 −1 (Mpc) (10 L⊙) (kpc) (kpc) (10 M⊙) (10 M⊙) (M⊙/L⊙) (10 cm ) v L R0 HI ESO 0140040 LSB 217.8 7.169 10.1 30.0 20.70 3.38 8.29 [?][?][?] NA ESO 0840411 LSB 82.4 0.287 3.5 9.1 0.06 0.21 1.49 [?][?] ES NA ESO 1200211 LSB 15.2 0.028 2.0 3.5 0.01 0.20 0.66 [?][?] ES NA ESO 1870510 LSB 16.8 0.054 2.1 2.8 0.09 1.62 2.02 [?][?][?] NA ESO 2060140 LSB 59.6 0.735 5.1 11.6 3.51 4.78 4.34 [?][?][?] NA ESO 3020120 LSB 70.9 0.717 3.4 11.2 0.77 1.07 2.37 [?][?] ES NA ESO 3050090 LSB 13.2 0.186 1.3 5.6 0.06 0.32 1.87 [?][?] ES NA ESO 4250180 LSB 88.3 2.600 7.3 14.6 4.79 1.84 5.17 [?][?][?] NA ESO 4880490 LSB 28.7 0.139 1.6 7.8 0.43 3.07 4.34 [?][?] ES NA F571-8 LSB 50.3 0.191 5.4 14.6 0.16 4.48 23.49 5.10 [?][?][?][?] F579-V1 LSB 86.9 0.557 5.2 14.7 0.21 3.33 5.98 3.18 [?][?][?][?] F730-V1 LSB 148.3 0.756 5.8 12.2 5.95 7.87 6.22 [?][?][?] NA UGC 04115 LSB 5.5 0.004 0.3 1.7 0.01 0.97 3.42 [?][?][?] NA UGC 06614 LSB 86.2 2.109 8.2 62.7 2.07 9.70 4.60 2.39 [?][?][?][?] UGC 11454 LSB 93.9 0.456 3.4 12.3 3.15 6.90 6.79 [?][?][?] NA UGC 11557 LSB 23.7 1.806 3.0 6.7 0.25 0.37 0.20 3.49 [?][?][?][?] UGC 11583 LSB 7.1 0.012 0.7 2.1 0.01 0.96 2.15 [?][?][?] NA UGC 11616 LSB 74.9 2.159 3.1 9.8 2.43 1.13 7.49 [?][?][?] NA UGC 11648 LSB 49.0 4.073 4.0 13.0 2.57 0.63 5.79 [?][?][?] NA UGC 11748 LSB 75.3 23.930 2.6 21.6 9.67 0.40 1.01 [?][?][?] NA UGC 11819 LSB 61.5 2.155 4.7 11.9 4.83 2.24 7.03 [?][?][?] NA

28 Properties of the Miscellaneous 22 Galaxy Sample 2 2 Galaxy Type Distance LB R0 Rlast MHI Mdisk (M/L)stars (v /c R)last Data Sources 10 10 10 −30 −1 (Mpc) (10 L⊙) (kpc) (kpc) (10 M⊙) (10 M⊙) (M⊙/L⊙) (10 cm ) v L R0 HI DDO 0168 LSB 4.5 0.032 1.2 4.4 0.03 0.06 2.03 2.22 [?][?][?][?] DDO 0170 LSB 16.6 0.023 1.9 13.3 0.09 0.05 1.97 1.18 [?][?][?][?] M 0033 HSB 0.9 0.850 2.5 8.9 0.11 1.13 1.33 4.62 [?][?][?][?] NGC 0055 LSB 1.9 0.588 1.9 12.2 0.13 0.30 0.50 2.22 [?][?][?][?] NGC 0247 LSB 3.6 0.512 4.2 14.3 0.16 1.25 2.43 2.94 [?][?][?][?] NGC 0300 LSB 2.0 0.271 2.1 11.7 0.08 0.65 2.41 2.69 [?][?][?][?] NGC 0801 HSB 63.0 4.746 9.5 46.7 1.39 6.93 2.37 3.59 [?][?][?][?] NGC 1003 LSB 11.8 1.480 1.9 31.2 0.63 0.66 0.45 1.53 [?][?][?][?] NGC 1560 LSB 3.7 0.053 1.6 10.3 0.12 0.17 3.16 2.16 [?][?][?][?] NGC 2683 HSB 10.2 1.882 2.4 36.0 0.15 6.03 3.20 2.28 [?][?][?][?] NGC 2998 HSB 59.3 5.186 4.8 41.1 1.78 7.16 1.75 3.43 [?][?][?][?] NGC 3109 LSB 1.5 0.064 1.3 7.1 0.06 0.02 0.35 2.29 [?][?][?][?] NGC 5033 HSB 15.3 3.058 7.5 45.6 1.07 0.27 3.28 3.16 [?][?][?][?] NGC 5371 HSB 35.3 7.593 4.4 41.0 0.89 8.52 1.44 3.98 [?][?][?][?] NGC 5533 HSB 42.0 3.173 7.4 56.0 1.39 2.00 4.14 3.31 [?][?][?][?] NGC 5585 HSB 9.0 0.333 2.0 14.0 0.28 0.36 1.09 2.06 [?][?][?][?] NGC 5907 HSB 16.5 5.400 5.5 48.0 1.90 2.49 1.89 3.44 [?][?][?][?] NGC 6503 HSB 5.5 0.417 1.6 20.7 0.14 1.53 3.66 2.30 [?][?][?][?] NGC 6674 HSB 42.0 4.935 7.1 59.1 2.18 2.00 2.52 3.57 [?][?][?][?] UGC 2259 LSB 10.0 0.110 1.4 7.8 0.04 0.47 4.23 3.76 [?][?][?][?] UGC 2885 HSB 80.4 23.955 13.3 74.1 3.98 8.47 0.72 4.31 [?][?][?][?] Malin 1 LSB 338.5 7.912 84.2 98.0 5.40 1.00 1.32 1.77 [?][?][?][?]

29 Properties of the 30 Dwarf Galaxy Sample 2 2 Galaxy Distance LB i (R0)disk Rlast MHI Mdisk (M/LB)disk (v /c R)last 9 B ◦ 9 9 B −30 −1 (Mpc) (10 L⊙) (kpc) (kpc) (10 M⊙) (10 M⊙) (M⊙/L⊙) (10 cm ) F568-V1 78.20 2.15 40 3.11 17.07 2.32 16.00 7.45 2.95 F574-1 94.10 3.42 65 4.20 13.69 3.31 14.90 4.35 2.77 UGC 731 11.80 0.69 57 2.43 10.30 1.61 3.21 4.63 1.91 UGC 3371 18.75 1.54 49 4.53 15.00 2.62 4.49 2.91 1.78 UGC 4173 16.70 0.33 –5 4.43 12.14 2.24 0.07 0.20 1.21 UGC 4325 11.87 1.71 41 1.92 6.91 1.04 6.51 3.82 4.37 UGC 4499 12.80 1.01 50 1.46 8.38 1.15 1.80 1.79 2.37 UGC 5414 9.40 0.49 55 1.40 4.10 0.57 1.13 2.29 3.31 UGC 5721 7.60 0.48 +10 0.76 8.41 0.57 1.90 3.96 2.27 UGC 5750 56.10 4.72 64 5.60 21.77 1.00 3.68 0.78 1.03 UGC 7232 3.14 0.08 59 0.30 0.91 0.06 0.14 1.76 7.64 UGC 7323 7.90 2.39 47 2.13 5.75 0.70 4.19 1.75 4.59 UGC 7399 24.66 4.61 2.32 32.30 6.38 5.42 1.18 1.32 UGC 7524 4.12 1.37 46 3.02 9.29 1.34 5.29 3.86 2.67 UGC 7559 4.20 0.04 61 0.87 2.75 0.12 0.05 1.32 1.43 UGC 7577 2.13 0.05 –15 0.51 1.39 0.04 0.01 0.20 1.18 UGC 7603 9.45 0.80 78 1.24 8.24 1.04 0.41 0.52 1.81 UGC 8490 5.28 0.95 +10 0.71 11.51 0.72 1.53 1.61 1.47 UGC 9211 14.70 0.33 44 1.54 9.62 1.43 1.23 3.69 1.55 UGC 11707 21.46 1.13 68 5.82 20.30 6.78 9.89 8.76 1.77 UGC 11861 19.55 9.44 50 4.69 12.80 4.33 45.84 4.86 6.55 UGC 12060 15.10 0.39 40 1.70 9.89 1.67 3.45 8.94 2.00 UGC 12632 9.20 0.86 46 3.43 11.38 1.55 4.26 4.97 1.82 UGC 12732 12.40 0.71 39 2.10 14.43 3.23 4.11 5.76 2.40 UGC 3851 4.85 2.33 2.07 11.70 1.32 0.47 0.20 1.37 UGC 4305 2.34 0.41 –5 0.68 4.75 0.31 0.08 0.20 1.18 UGC 4459 3.06 0.03 27 0.60 2.47 0.04 0.01 0.20 0.97 UGC 5139 4.69 0.20 14 0.96 3.58 0.21 0.05 0.24 1.19 UGC 5423 7.14 0.14 45 0.61 1.97 0.05 0.28 2.01 1.82 UGC 5666 3.85 2.53 56 3.56 11.25 1.37 1.96 0.77 1.88

30 10 Connecting Conformal and Einstein Gravity

2 Under gµν(x) = ω (x)ˆgµν(x) 1 1 I = − d4x(−g)1/2Rα = − d4x(−gˆ)1/2 ω2Rˆα − 6ˆgµν∂ ω∂ ω , (70) EH 16πG Z α 16πG Z α µ ν

’t Hooft: Do path integral over conformal factor ω(x)

1 C 1 I = Trln[ˆgµν∇ˆ ∇ˆ + Rˆα ] = d4x(−gˆ)1/2[RˆµνRˆ − (Rˆα )2], (71) EFF µ ν 6 α 120 Z µν 3 α

’t Hooft: go from Einstein to conformal. Maldacena: go from conformal to Einstein

11 Summary To conclude, we note that at the beginning of the 20th century studies of black-body radiation on microscopic scales led to a paradigm shift in physics. Thus it could that at the beginning of the 21st century studies of black-body radiation, this time on macroscopic cosmological scales, might be presaging a paradigm shift all over again.