DOCSLIB.ORG

Montgomery County Critical Infrastructure and Key Resource Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Montgomery County Critical Infrastructure and Key Resource Assessment Montgomery County Critical Infrastructure and Key Resource Assessment Updated August 2014 Final Version 1 Executive Summary The Montgomery County Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security (OEMHS) has prepared the Montgomery County Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources (CIKR) Assessment for Montgomery County, Maryland in its efforts to circumvent further damage followed by a natural or manmade disaster. The purpose of the CIKR Assessment is to respond to all disasters and emergencies and ensure the safety and protection of its citizens. The plan also establishes the policies, plans, guidelines and procedures that will allow for the preservation, maintenance or reconstitution of the County’s ability to carry out its responsibilities under all circumstances that may disrupt normal governmental operations. The CIKR Assessment will assist the County leadership in its protection of citizens, property, and businesses; and the restoration of County operations. It is the policy of Montgomery County Government to provide essential services to the citizens of this County with regard to any manmade or natural disaster. Therefore in accordance with US Department of Homeland Security’s National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP) guidance, this assessment was developed so that the County can continue to serve and protect its citizens during a disaster. With the disruption of essential services such as public health, transportation, police, fire and rescue, County Executive and Council, and other critical municipalities; the CIKR Assessment will enable the County to restore these crucial entities safely and effectively. The CIKR Assessment will map out the County’s critical infrastructure, its key resources and ensuring backup systems for the essential functions. The CIKR Assessment applies the functions, operations, and resources necessary to ensure the continuation of the Montgomery County Government to normal operations if threatened with a crisis. 2 Introduction The CIKR Assessment presents an executive structure establishing operational procedures to sustain essential measures if normal operations have been devastated, and offers a guide to restore government functions to full normal operations. When and where a disaster will occur is never known; however, the County may be able to reduce the impact through preparedness and planning. The purpose of the CIKR Assessment will assist the County in its response and recovery during the post-disaster phase. The Assessment will make clear what actions the County will take in order to sustain operations resulting from a weather related emergency, public health epidemic, or a manmade disaster. The County’s critical infrastructure has been broken into three tiers based on their criticality and significance towards restoring Montgomery County’s normal operations. The first tier is focused on immediate response and recovery, and the preservation of property. The second tier focused on provision of critical services, and the restoration of services needed for day to day operations within 72 hours. The third tier’s agencies are mainly focused on long term recovery issues. During the response and recovery efforts, the CIKR Assessment should also work in conjunction with the County’s Hazard Mitigation Plan, Pre-Disaster Recovery Plan, Continuity of Government (COG) Plan, the County’s Continuity of Operations Plans (COOP), the Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), and the County’s Crisis Communications Plan. Purpose The Montgomery County Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security (OEMHS) is providing a resource for Montgomery County leadership to manage and sustain the County’s level of preparedness in an all hazards environment. The CIKR Assessment will provide a guideline for County’s leadership to minimize the loss of life, injury, and property damage. Objective Create a standard operating guide identifies Montgomery County’s critical infrastructure and key resources (CIKR); distinguishing those owned by the County, private companies, non-profit groups, and regional/state owned entities, by identifying assets within the County that directly or indirectly impact CIKR. Another key element is to assign roles and responsibilities for various CIKR, both within the County, and partners throughout the region that will have a direct impact on Montgomery County. Scope Montgomery County’s CIKR Guidance should include the steps outlined in the National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP); the process outlined in this document will reduce the vulnerabilities in CIKR through a data driven analysis of cross-sector assets and systemic dependencies and interdependencies. Critical Infrastructure Sectors DHS Critical Infrastructure Sectors as Defined in the NIPP is a coordinated process to synthesize the 16 sector-specific plans issued by the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS), an action plan accounting for the distinctive 3 US DHS Critical Infrastructure Sectors as Defined in the NIPP Critical Infrastructure Sector Examples of Assets Agriculture and Food Food processing plants, Farm facilities Commercial Facilities Sports stadiums, Shopping malls Banking and Finance Stock Exchanges, Federal Reserve Communications Telephone switching stations, Satellite receivers Chemical Chemical manufacturing plants Critical Manufacturing Primary metal manufacturing, Engine manufacturing Dams Major dams Energy Power plants, Substations Information Technology Fiber optic lines, Server farms Defense Industrial Base Facilities supporting DoD operations Government Facilities Government office buildings Transportation Systems Train stations, Bridges, Tunnels, Ports Emergency Services Fire stations, Police stations Healthcare and Public Health Hospitals, Strategic National Stockpile sites Nuclear Reactors, Materials and Nuclear facilities Waste Water Water treatment plants, Reservoirs, Boundary valves Concept Montgomery County Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security is looking to build a set of County specific critical infrastructure and resilience assets. These efforts build on critical infrastructure efforts already undertaken in the state and are based on economic and vital information, County stakeholder input, and state and local best practices. The guide will prioritize infrastructure in terms of recovery and implement current County plans which are pertinent to the County’s critical infrastructure. Montgomery County’s Infrastructure Montgomery County’s critical infrastructure have been broken into two tiers based on the essential services provided enable County government to provide vital services, exercise civil authority, maintain safety and well-being of the general populace, and what functions must continue in order to continue to serve Montgomery County residents by sustaining government operations. Tier I’s critical infrastructure are focused on the County’s life sustaining and civil order, and will be critical to the first 72 hours post disaster and be sustainable for up to 30 days. Tier I functions also concentrate on the leadership of the County emergency support functions (ESF), and the ability to implement emergency plans and procedures accordingly without delay. 4 Tier I: . Communications . Energy . Information Technology . Dams . Transportation Systems . Emergency Services . Healthcare and Public Health . Water Tier I CIKR are focused on post-disaster assessment and recovery: communications equipment, re-establishment of IT systems, data lines, telephone lines, accounting software, email software, and vital records are only some of the examples of the communication tools required for Tier II agencies, and typically within 72 hours post-disaster. The functions within Tier II identified CIKR will have the knowledge of the County’s Emergency Operations Center (EOC), the County’s Pre-Disaster Recovery Plan, and the County’s Crisis Communications Plan. These County plans will be critical in ensuring the quick response to disaster recovery, and the following agencies will have the expertise in carrying out the tasks required to restore these functions. Tier II CIKR Include: . Agriculture and Food . Commercial Facilities . Banking and Finance . Chemical . Critical Manufacturing . Defense Industrial Base . Government Facilities . Nuclear Reactors, Materials and Waste Regional Partners The roles and responsibilities as identified will be incumbent on County agencies’ relationship with many of the private sector companies that control Montgomery County’s critical infrastructure. Many of the owners and operators of these critical assets should have their own relationships established with County partners and community work groups. First responders should have data readily available to them in terms of the location and capacity of key critical infrastructure, and the data should be available to all county agencies so that any entity may access. Many of the key players and offices that directly impact Montgomery County’s infrastructure are not located within Montgomery County. Although the owners and operators of these key resources are within the County, these critical assets impact the whole State of Maryland and the 5 entire NCR. Many of the subject matter experts are a part of the committees, councils, and members of the state and federal partners. Throughout the National Capital Region and the State of Maryland offers programs that are closely tied in with federal, state, local, and private stakeholders. Many of these programs can be used as a resource for providers, and enable
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WSSC Update on Consent Decree Projects
    Presentation to the Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection Water Quality Advisory Group Consent Decree Projects in Montgomery County October 21, 2013 Discussion Points Sewer Repair, Rehabilitation & Replacement (SR3)Program Overview Basins in Montgomery County Consent Decree Project Overview Lateral Contracts Roads Contracts ESA Contracts Expectations During Construction Activities Questions SR3 Program Overview Background Federal Consent Decree between the United States, the State of Maryland, Citizen Groups and WSSC Priority 1 Assets must be completed by December 7, 2015 Large scale program to improve collection system performance and restore condition Reduce sewer overflows and backups Basins in Montgomery County •Cabin John •Dulles Interceptor •Little Falls •Muddy Branch •Monocacy •Northwest Branch •Paint Branch •Patuxent North •Rock Creek •Rock Run •Seneca Creek •Sligo Creek •Watts Branch Consent Decree Projects Overview Laterals Repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of sewer house connections (laterals) and the installation of cleanouts and mainline lateral connection seals. Lateral repairs will involve work between the main line sewer and the property line. Roads Repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of aging and defective sewers using Cured-In-Place Pipe (CIPP), pipe bursting, and open cut excavation. Work also includes chemical grout injection, internal spot repairs, external point repairs, manhole grouting and lining, and cleaning and inspection of sewers. Work occurs in neighborhoods and populated areas. Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA) Sanitary sewer system rehabilitation utilizing mainly trenchless methods. Some repair work will require open cut methods. Work consists of the rehabilitating sewer mainline, lateral, and manhole systems. Work will be associated with stream restoration activities and the construction of temporary access roads in ESA.
    [Show full text]
  • Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena
    Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena Time Path Path Number of Estimated June 2006 Local/ Length Width Persons Damage Location Date Standard (Miles) (Yards) Killed Injured Property Crops Character of Storm ATLANTIC OCEAN ANZ531 Chesapeake Bay Pooles Is To Sandy Pt Md Millers Island to01 1902EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (EG34) Tolchester Beach 1918EST ANZ532 Chesapeake Bay Sandy Pt To N Beach Md 5 SE Annapolis01 2109EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (MG35) Wind gust measured at Thomas Point Light. A trough of low pressure was draped across the Mid Atlantic on June 1. This feature combined with high moisture content and instability in the atmosphere to promote scattered strong to severe thunderstorms. The thunderstorms first developed across the higher terrain of the Appalachian Mountains, then moved east across the Washington/Baltimore corridor. ANZ534 Chesapeake Bay Drum Pt To Smith Pt Va Solomons Island02 1754EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (MG38) 1812EST ANZ536 Tidal Potomac Indian Hd To Cobb Is Md Dahlgren02 1756EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (MG50) Wind gust was measured at Cuckold Creek. ANZ533 Chesapeake Bay N Beach To Drum Pt Md Cove Pt02 1800EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (MG37) 1820EST ANZ532 Chesapeake Bay Sandy Pt To N Beach Md 5 SE Annapolis02 1858EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (MG39) 1901EST ANZ537 Tidal Potomac Cobb Is Md To Smith Pt Va Piney Pt to04 1554EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (MG38) Lewisetta 1700EST ANZ534 Chesapeake Bay Drum Pt To Smith Pt Va Patuxent River Nas to04 1605EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (MG38) Smith Island 1700EST ANZ535 Tidal Potomac Key Bridge To Indian Hd Md Rnld Reagan Natl Arpt09 1453EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (EG34) ANZ533 Chesapeake Bay N Beach To Drum Pt Md Cove Pt09 1630EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (MG37) 1700EST ANZ535 Tidal Potomac Key Bridge To Indian Hd Md Rnld Reagan Natl Arpt09 1751EST 0 0 Marine Tstm Wind (MG36) Daytime heating combined with an unstable lower atmosphere and favorable amounts of moisture contributed to scattered afternoon and evening thunderstorms.
    [Show full text]
  • MC-002-2017, MC Boat Houses
    MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK & PLANNING COMMISSION Montgomery County Department of Parks Enterprise Division Audit of Black Hill and Lake Needwood Boat Houses Report Number: MC-002-2017 August 31, 2016 Distribution: Executive Committee Casey Anderson Elizabeth Hewlett Patricia Barney Audit Committee Norman Dreyfuss Karen Tobat Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Adrian Gardner John Nissel Mike Riley Christy Turnbull Joseph Zimmerman Office of Internal Audit Renee Kenney Robert Feeley Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Office of Internal Audit 7833 Walker Drive, Suite 425 Greenbelt, MD 20770 Audit of Black Hill and Lake Needwood Boat Houses Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. Background………………………………………………………………....1 B. Scope, Objective and Methodology of the Audit………….……………2 C. Major Audit Concerns….…………………………………………….…….3 D. Overall Conclusions…………………………….…………………….……4 II. DETAILED COMMENTARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS None Enterprise Division Audit of Black Hill and Lake Needwood Boat Houses MC-002-2017 I. EXECUTI VE SUMMARY A. Background Black Hill Boat House is located in Black Hill Regional Park on the 505 acre Little Seneca Lake in Boyds, Maryland. Lake Needwood Boat House is located in Rock Creek Regional Park on the 75 acre Lake Needwood in Rockville, Maryland. They are managed by the Enterprise Division under the Deputy Director of Operations within the Montgomery County Department of Parks. Both boat houses have kayaks, canoes, rowboats and pedal boats available for rent, along with a pontoon boat for tours. Fishing is also allowed at each lake. Page 1 Enterprise Division Audit of Black Hill and Lake Needwood Boat Houses MC-002-2017 B. Scope, Objective, and Methodology of the Audit Objective: The purpose of this audit was to perform a review of both Black Hill and Lake Needwood Boat Houses to evaluate and assess the adequacy of the design and operational effectiveness of their internal controls and determine if Commission policies and procedures are being followed.
    [Show full text]
  • ASDSO Membership
    Association of State Dam Safety Officials Annual Report July 2006 - June 2007 Association of State Dam Safety Officials 450 Old Vine St. Lexington, KY 40507 The Association of State Dam Safety Officials 2007 Annual Report documents progress toward the financial and strategic planning goals set for this fiscal year. The fiscal year cycle takes into account activities from July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. The report follows the format of ASDSO’s Strategic Plan. Respectfully submitted, 2006-07 ASDSO Board of Directors James W. Gallagher, P.E. (President), New Hampshire Robert B. Finucane, P.E., Vermont Kenneth E. Smith, P.E. (Past President), Indiana David A. Gutierrez, P.E., California Mark B. Ogden, P.E. (President-Elect), Ohio John H. Moyle, P.E., New Jersey Steven M. Bradley, P.E.(Treasurer), South Carolina Stephen Partney, P.E., Florida; replaced in mid-term by James MacLellan, Mississippi Robert K. Martinez, P.E. (Secretary), Nevada Randy Bass., P.E., Affiliate Member Advisory Committee Chair James L. Alexander, P.E., Missouri Staff Jason Boyle, P.E., North Dakota; replaced in mid-term by Doug Johnson, Washington Lori C. Spragens, Executive Director Jack Byers, P.E., Colorado Susan A. Sorrell, Membership & Meetings Director Max Fowler, P.E., North Carolina Sarah M. Mayfield, Information Specialist Maureen C. Hogle, Promotions and Marketing Members of the 2006-07 Board (L to R) Randy Bass (Affiliate Member Advisory Committee Chair), Jim Alexander (MO), Max Fowler (NC), David Gutierrez (CA), Mark Ogden (OH)(President-Elect), Steve Partney (FL)(replaced in mid-term by James MacLellan [MS]), Bob Finucane (VT), Ken Smith (IN)(Past President), John Moyle (NJ), Jim Gallagher (NH)(President), Jason Boyle (ND)(replaced in mid-term by Doug Johnson [WA]), Steve Bradley (SC)(Treasurer), Jack Byers (CO), and Rob Martinez (NV)(Secretary).
    [Show full text]
  • DC Flood Insurance Study
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WASHINGTON, D.C. REVISED: SEPTEMBER 27, 2010 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 110001V000A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panels for this community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways and cross sections). In addition, former flood insurance risk zone designations have been changed as follows. Old Zone(s) New Zone A1 – A30 AE V1 – V30 VE B X C X The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Initial FIS Effective Date: November 15, 1985 Revised FIS Date: September 27, 2010 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • "Federation Corner" Column the Montgomery Sentinel - July 6, 2006
    "Federation Corner" column The Montgomery Sentinel - July 6, 2006 Proper maintenance of Lake Needwood long overdue by Wayne Goldstein MCCF President For several days last week, thousands of county residents were evacuated from their homes after county officials became alarmed at water seeping through Lake Needwood's dam. Although this emergency is over for now, this is the right time to look more closely at other problems at Lake Needwood. This July 20th will mark the 50th anniversary of the 1956 flooding that killed six county residents and sparked the drive to help prevent such future killing floods by building flood control dams on Rock Creek. The drive to build the dams, led by an activist citizens group known as the Rock Creek Watershed Association, also included a demand by the group to change zoning and soil conservation laws. These citizens wanted to prevent people from building in flood plains, wanted to limit additional impervious surfaces and resulting stormwater runoff, and wanted to minimize the amount of sediment washing into Upper Rock Creek, the lakes behind the dams, and the lower Rock Creek. Construction of the dams that created Lake Needwood and Lake Bernard Frank began in October 1964 and were completed within 2 years with federal funding through the PL-566 program. Lake Needwood was built to provide both flood control and recreational facilities. It is ironic that the biggest flood threat this time was the fear that the dam holding back Lake Needwood might fail. The 1988 dam inspection report states: "Overall, this is one of the best maintained PL-566 dams in state..." The first specific mention of seepage through the Lake Needwood dam was in 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • Amendment to the Facility Plan for the North Branch Hiker Biker Trail
    MCPB Item No. Date: 11/30/17 November 23, 2017 MEMORANDUM TO: Montgomery County Planning Board VIA: Michael F. Riley, Director Mitra Pedoeem, Deputy Director Michael Ma, Chief, Park Development Division (PDD) Patricia McManus, Design Sec on Supervisor, (PDD) FROM: Aaron Feldman, Landscape Architect (PDD), 301-650-2887 SUBJECT: Amendment to the Facility Plan for the North Branch Hiker Biker Trail STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve modifi ca ons to the 2013 Facility Plan for the North Branch Hiker-Biker Trail, specifi cally: 1) Relocate the proposed trailhead and parking lot from Muncaster Mill Road to Meadowside Lane. 2) Relocate the proposed bridge from near the Meadowside Nature Center to just south of the Intercounty Connector (ICC). PROJECT SUMMARY In March of 2017, during the detailed design phase of the project, the Norbeck Manor Homeowners Associa on contacted staff with concerns about the proposed loca on of a trailhead and parking lot intended to serve the North Branch Trail. Staff a ended a Homeowners Associa on mee ng, reviewed the concerns, studied alterna ves and presented them at a subsequent public mee ng for feedback. In light of strong community support for reloca ng the trailhead and parking lot from the loca on shown in the approved 2013 Facility Plan, staff is returning to the Planning Board for approval of the new loca on and other minor modifi ca ons to the overall plan. ExisƟ ng CondiƟ ons Located within both Rock Creek Regional Park and the North Branch Stream Valley Park, the North Branch Hiker-Biker Trail is a 2.2 mile-long segment of a con nuous regional trail system that will eventually extend from the District of Columbia northward to Olney.
    [Show full text]
  • District of Columbia Washington, D.C
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WASHINGTON, D.C. REVISED: SEPTEMBER 27, 2010 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 110001V000A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panels for this community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways and cross sections). In addition, former flood insurance risk zone designations have been changed as follows. Old Zone(s) New Zone A1 – A30 AE V1 – V30 VE B X C X The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Initial FIS Effective Date: November 15, 1985 Revised FIS Date: September 27, 2010 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chesapeake Bay Trust Maryland Outdoor Spaces - Legislator Favorites 1/21/21
    Chesapeake Bay Trust Maryland Outdoor Spaces - Legislator Favorites 1/21/21 On January 21, 2021, more than 60 legislators attended the Chesapeake Bay Trust’s virtual legislative reception. They were invited to share some of their favorite outdoor spots in their districts and throughout Maryland. Their contributions were so wonderful that we were asked to compile them and send them to attendees. As Senate President Bill Ferguson said, “Our parks are those spaces that bring Marylanders together to get that fundamental belief in love of family, of friends, of each other.” “Our 6,400 parks and green spaces are a great way to boost your mental and overall health” added House Speaker Adrienne Jones.” Maryland Department of Natural Resources Secretary Jeanne Haddaway-Riccio reminded us all how diverse Maryland is, and we see this in the list of favorite spots below. Below is YOUR list! The sites on the list below are not exhaustive, but were those suggested by legislators and guests present that evening as places they visit to get outdoors and feel refreshed and recharged. The entries include a word or two about the site, at times thoughts from your colleagues, the name of the legislator suggesting the site, and a website for more information. You can visit by yourself or call up your colleagues and ask for a personal tour! Anne Arundel County B&A Trail, great for walking, biking, rollerblading, and more, stretches from Boulters Way in Annapolis to Dorsey Road in Glen Burnie, Maryland. The Earleigh Heights Ranger Station (ca. 1889) is located in Severna Park with parking available on the premises.
    [Show full text]
  • F/.{Egis Ative Attorney
    AGENDA ITEM #4 November 1, 2011 Public Hearing MEMORANDUM October 28, 2011 TO: County Council 1 . FROM: Jeffirey L. Zyontz,f/.{egIs atIve Attorney SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Redistricting Commission Report Bill 31-11, Council Districts - Boundaries On October 4, the Redistricting Commission presented its report to Council, and Bill 31-11, affirming the Commission's plan, was introduced. This public hearing will be on both the Commission redistricting plan and Bill 31-11. A Council worksession is scheduled for November 8, 2011. Charter Requirements The Charter requires the 5 Council Districts to be compact, contiguous, and substantially equal in population. l Staff believes that the Commission proposed redistricts meet those standards. This conclusion should not be taken to mean that the Commission's plan is the only way to meet Charter standards. The Council can approve different district boundaries that also are compact, contiguous, and substantially equal in population. Compactness for the purpose of redistricting is a judgment that Federal Courts have left to legislatures. It is not a mathematical standard. Mathematically, the most compact district would be a perfect circle. The least compact district would be a district one block wide for its entire length. The Commission used 2010 precincts to construct their proposed districts. That decision ensured that proposed districts are never narrower than the width of a precinct at any point. 1 Charter § 103: Montgomery County shall be divided into five Council districts for the purpose of nominating and electing five members of the Council. Each district shall be compact in form and be composed of adjoining territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Creek Watershed Implementation Plan
    ROCK CREEK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PREPARED FOR: MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 255 Rockville Pike, Suite 120 January 2012 Rock Creek Implementation Plan January, 2012 Prepared for: Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection 255 Rockville Pike, Suite 120 Rockville, MD 20850 Prepared by: Biohabitats, Inc. 2081 Clipper Park Road Baltimore, MD 21211 In collaboration with: Versar Chesapeake Stormwater Network 9200 Rumsey Rd 117 Ingleside Avenue Columbia, MD 21045-1934 Baltimore, MD 21228 Horsley Witten Group RESOLVE 90 Route 6A 1255 23rd Street, NW, Suite 875 Sandwich, MA 02563 Washington, DC, 20037 Capuco Consulting Services 914 Bay Ridge Road, Suite 206 Annapolis, MD 21403 Rock Creek Implementation Plan Rock Creek Implementation Plan Table of Contents Acronym List .................................................................................................................................... 2 1 Goals and Existing Conditions ................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Introduction to the Implementation Plan and Watershed Goals ................................... 3 1.2 Existing Conditions in the Rock Creek Watershed .......................................................... 4 1.3 Problems Facing the Rock Creek Watershed .................................................................. 9 1.4 Existing Pollutant Loads and Impervious Surfaces ........................................................ 11 2 Inventory of Provisional Restoration Candidates
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Crescent Trail Concept Plan
    CONCEPT PLAN For The CAPITAL CRESCENT TRAIL Proposed By THE COALITION FOR THE CAPITAL CRESCENT TRAIL And GREATER BETHESDA-CHEVY CHASE COALITION DECEMBER 1988 Coalition for the Capital- Crescent Trail - Coalition Members American Forestry Association Montgomery County Road Runners American Hiking Society National Handicapped Sports and American Youth Hostels-Potomac Area Recreation Association Council National Institutes of Health Bicycle Appalachian Mountain Club (D.C.Chapter) Commuting Club Arlington County Bike Club National Parks and Conservation Audubon Naturalist Society Association Blue Ridge Voyageurs National Recreation & Parks Association Capital Hiking Club Northern Virginia Volksmarchers Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Association Pentagon Pacesetters Citizens Association of Georgetown Potomac Appalachian Trail Club Committee of 100 for the Federal City Potomac Boat Club Conservation Federation of Maryland Potomac Pedalers Touring Club District of Columbia Road Runners Club Rails-to-Trails Conservancy Greater Bethesda-Chevy Chase Coalition Sierra Club (Rock Creek Group) Maryland Association of Bicycling Virginia Volkssport Association Organizations Walkways Center Montgomery County Citizens Bicycle Wanderbirds Hiking Club Committee Washington Area Bicyclist Association Montgomery County Outdoor Education Washington Canoe Club Association Washington Women Outdoors Greater Bethesda-Chew Chase Coalition - Coalition Members Allied Civic Group Hamlet Place Owners, Inc. Cabin John Citizens Kenwood Citizens Association Association Kenwood
    [Show full text]