DOCSLIB.ORG

Future Luton Airport Ltd Making Best Use of Our Runway a Luton Council Company Statement of Community Consultation (Socc) Statutory Consultation 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Future Luton Airport Ltd Making Best Use of Our Runway a Luton Council Company Statement of Community Consultation (Socc) Statutory Consultation 2019 London Future LuToN Airport Ltd Making best use of our runway A Luton Council company Statement of Community Consultation (SoCC) Statutory Consultation 2019 1 2 Contents 01 Introduction 04 02 Statutory consultation 09 03 Publicising the consultation 17 04 Engagement 20 05 Next steps 22 Appendices 25 01 Introduction Project description • Vehicle forecourt and multi- Our application will include • For local businesses – storey short-stay / mid-stay car replacement parkland and public we will offer greater London Luton Airport Limited parking adjacent to the terminal open space to compensate for opportunities to trade (LLAL), owner of London Luton • Mid- and long-stay parking the area of existing parkland into We recognise that any airport Airport (LTN), is publishing which the airport would expand. this Statement of Community • Bus station, taxi ranks and has impacts as well as benefits, Consultation (SoCC) to outline Luton DART in forecourt area A map showing the boundary of and one key purpose of our how we will carry out our the proposed development can summer 2018 consultation was • Support buildings statutory community consultation be found in Appendix 1 of this to identify the effects that local on our proposals to expand • Relocated engine ground document. people are most concerned LTN by making best use of the running bay To achieve the increase in about. We are committed to working with our partners, existing runway. • Fire training facilities passenger numbers, we are also proposing associated airlines, local communities, The permitted capacity of • Improvement to fuel storage improvements to surface access statutory bodies, and the LTN is currently 18 million facilities transport infrastructure, including government, to avoid, reduce, passengers per annum (mppa). and mitigate potential adverse Our expansion project would • Replacement of existing and roads and the airport forecourt. planned public open space and impacts. increase the capacity of the Our key objectives for the amenities airport to 32 mppa. This would project, as identified in our Vision This SoCC is required under require a new terminal on the • Road and infrastructure for Sustainable Growth, 2020- Section 47 of the Planning Act north side of the existing runway, provision and adjustments 2050 (which can be read on our 2008. It outlines how we will and other landside and airside consult those living in the vicinity This new terminal would be website: futureluton.llal.org.uk), infrastructure. are: of LTN including residents, used alongside the existing interest groups, businesses, and The proposals would include: terminal and its associated • For local communities – we will airport users. Section four of • Terminal facilities with stands, allowing the expansion be a better neighbour this document sets out how we to be phased over time to boarding piers • For our airlines – we will enable will promote this consultation match demand and growth. This to those groups, to ensure that • Additional aircraft stands you to grow cost-effectively approach would also minimise as many interested parties as • For our passengers – we will • Additional taxiways disruption to the operation of the possible have the opportunity to improve choice and your airport during construction. comment on our proposals. experience 4 01 Introduction DCO process Under the Planning Act 2008, we defines “host” authorities as significance, including economic are required to consult on our those authorities for the area impact, noise, and surface As our project is seeking consent proposals before submitting the within which the land for the access, we have also consulted for airport-related development DCO application. Feedback from proposed development is with a wider group of local that would expand the permitted the consultation will be recorded located, which are: authorities on the draft SoCC, capacity of LTN by over 10 and carefully considered in including: mppa, it is a type of development • Luton Borough Council developing our proposals. As • Aylesbury Vale District Council and of a scale that meets the part of the DCO process, we • Hertfordshire County Council thresholds to be a Nationally must satisfy PINS that our pre- • North Hertfordshire District • London Borough of Barnet Significant Infrastructure Project application consultation has Council • Bedford Borough Council (NSIP) for the purposes of the been carried out adequately and • Central Bedfordshire Council • Buckinghamshire County Planning Act 2008. fulfils all of the statutory criteria, Council As such, we must apply to the including the duty to publicise We set up a Consultation Group, Secretary of State for Transport and the duty to have regard to a working group which included • Cambridgeshire County for a Development Consent responses. representatives from the above Council councils, to discuss how best Order (DCO) to consider This document sets out how • Dacorum Borough Council to engage local communities and determine the proposed we will carry out our community in the statutory consultation • East Hertfordshire District development. NSIP applications consultation under Section 47 of programme. Council are examined by the national the Planning Act 2008. Planning Inspectorate (PINS), As the nature of airport • London Borough of Enfield In accordance with Section 47(2) and decided by the secretary expansion proposals generate of the Planning Act 2008, this • Essex County Council of state, rather than the local issues of more than a local planning authority. We aim to document has been prepared in • London Borough of Harrow submit our DCO application in consultation with the following summer 2020. “host” local authorities. Section 43(1) of the Planning Act 2008 5 01 Introduction • London Borough of Hillingdon Planning Act 2008 concurrently EIA development scope of the EIA (“a scoping with our community consultation opinion”) from PINS. This • Huntingdonshire District Our project will also require under Section 47. Consultation scoping opinion is available Council Environmental Impact activities under Sections 42 and in the document library on Assessment (EIA), as defined • Milton Keynes Borough Council 48, with local authorities and our project website: by the Infrastructure Planning other statutory consultees, will futureluton.llal.org.uk • South Cambridgeshire District (Environmental Impact be addressed separately from Council Assessment) Regulations 2017 In addition to the EIA, and in this SoCC. • St Albans City & District (“the 2017 Regulations”). EIA is accordance with regulation Council In addition to having their views therefore being carried out so 12 of the 2017 Regulations, on the scheme considered as that the significant effects of the a Preliminary Environmental • Stevenage Borough Council part of our consultation, anyone proposals on the environment Information Report (PEIR), will be • Uttlesford District Council will also be able to register and are properly understood and produced. The PEIR will take on • Welwyn Hatfield Borough make representations to PINS to identify the necessary board the scoping opinion, set Council the once the application has mitigation measures and inform out our survey methodologies, been submitted. PINS and the secretary of state and describe the initial findings The consultation programme You can read more about the on the full impact. of the assessment. This will described in this document takes be published and available to DCO process on our website As part of the EIA, we will submit into account comments received read as part of the consultation (futureluton.llal.org.uk) or on an Environmental Statement from these local authorities. documentation and made the planning inspectorate to PINS. The Environmental available for comment as part We will also be conducting website (infrastructure. Statement will describe the of the statutory consultation statutory consultation under planninginspectorate.gov.uk). significant impacts identified by process. Sections 42 and 48 of the To find out more, you can also the assessment. We have also call LLAL on 01582 548782 obtained an opinion on the (phoneline open Monday-Friday, 9am – 5pm), please leave a message where necessary. 6 01 Introduction About us London Luton Airport Limited Owner of (LLAL) is the owner of London London Luton Airport Limited Luton Airport (LTN). Our Luton Borough Council (LBC) company is, in turn, wholly owned by Luton Borough Council. As such, LTN is unique in that it is the only major UK airport remaining wholly publicly- owned. The airport is operated Airport Owner under a concession agreement (until 2031) by London Luton London Luton Airport Limited Airport Operations Limited (LLAL) (LLAOL). This chart represents our relationship with our key stakeholders. Airport Operator Regulators Users Concession Department for Transport Airlines London Luton Airport Civil Aviation Authority Business Aviation Operations Limited Environment Agency Cargo airlines (LLAOL) Customers General public and businesses 7 01 Introduction Our summer 2018 consultation The objective of our summer A full account of how we carried was held over ten weeks, 2018 consultation was to collate out this consultation, and the beginning on Monday 25 June feedback from the public, results, can be found in the 2018 and ending on Friday businesses, statutory bodies and report entitled Non-Statutory 31 August. other organisations and interest Consultation Feedback Report, At our summer 2018 groups, so that we could reflect February 2019, which
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LADACAN Pre-Application DCO Response Why Grow?
    LADACAN pre-application DCO response Q3. Have you experienced any of the following impacts of LTN? (Please tick all that apply) • Air pollution Yes • Traffic congestion caused by the airport Yes • Noise pollution during the day Yes • Noise pollution at night, i.e. between 11:00pm and 6:00am Yes • Light pollution Yes • Other (please write below) Our members report experiencing increasing impact on quality of life due to sheer number of flights all through the day: early in the morning, when inside or outside during the day, late in the evening, and waking people at night; increased visual intrusion especially with the larger aircraft; significant concern over climate change impacts; far more contrails in the morning sky; the smell of fuel in different parts of Luton; problems of fly parking; traffic congestion and crowded trains. Why grow? Please see chapter 4 of the Guide to Statutory Consultation, which outlines the reasons why we are proposing to expand LTN. Further detail can be found in our Outline Need Case document, which is available on our website, futureluton.llal.org.uk, and at the document inspection venues and consultation events listed in chapter 12 of the Guide to Statutory Consultation. Q4a. Are there any other factors that you think we should consider in producing our demand forecasts? LADACAN is a community group whose members live in communities all around Luton Airport and are affected by its noise and other impacts on their daily lives. We keep in contact with members by email, through a website, and at public meetings. We have had a seat on the London Luton Airport Consultative Committee and its Noise and Track Sub- Committee for many years and are an active and knowledgeable participant at meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Luton: Making Best Use of Our Runway
    Future LuToN: Making best use of our runway Surface Access Strategy Report October 2019 Future LuToN: Making best use of our runway Surface Access Strategy Report Contents Page 1 Introduction 5 Context 5 Surface access 5 Importance of surface access to the airport expansion plans 5 Mode choice, demand management and mitigation 6 Existing airport planning permission and current enhancements to transport 7 Recent and on-going airport improvements 7 Purpose of this report 7 Structure of this report 7 2 Overall Surface Access Strategy 10 Overview 10 On-site principles 10 Parking locations and type 10 Forecourt layout 13 Public transport arrangements/ walking and cycling 17 Background committed improvements - Century Park Access Road (CPAR) 19 Background committed improvements - East Luton improvements 21 3 Public transport strategy 23 Existing modal split 23 Existing Airport Surface Access Strategy (2018-2022) 24 Transport policy 25 Modal split trends 26 Existing public transport offer 27 Public transport improvements 28 Forecasting assumptions 38 Rail capacity assessment 39 Comparative analysis with other airports 40 Summary 42 4 Transport modelling approach 44 Modelling framework 44 CBLTM-LTN strategic model 45 CBLTM-LTN model base and time periods 46 CLTM-LTN model coverage 47 CBLTM-LTN key work phases 47 1 Future LuToN: Making best use of our runway Surface Access Strategy Report VISSIM model 48 VISSIM model base and time periods 49 VISSIM model development, calibration and validation 49 VISSIM model forecasting 50 VISSIM outputs 51 5
    [Show full text]
  • Help to Heat Local Authority Flexible Eligibility Statement of Intent
    APPENDIX 2 Energy Company Obligation: Help to Heat Local Authority Flexible Eligibility Statement of Intent On behalf of Action on Energy Cambridgeshire including: Cambridge City Council, East Cambridgeshire District Council, Fenland District Council, Huntingdonshire District Council and South Cambridgeshire District Council. Date of publication: **TBC** Version: 1.4 URL: [insert webpage SOI has been published on] 1) Introduction 1.1. Fuel poverty in England is measured using the Low Income High Costs (LIHC) indicator, which considers a household to be fuel poor if: they have required fuel costs that are above average (the national median level); and were they to spend that amount, they would be left with a residual income below the official poverty line.1 1.2. Nationally the 2015 figures for England estimate that 2.5 million households suffer from fuel poverty, 11% the total.2 Living in a cold home doubles the risk of respiratory problems in children; increases the risk of minor illnesses; exacerbates existing conditions such as arthritis and is associated with 3 times the level of excess winter deaths as the warmest homes.3 1.3. Action on Energy Cambridgeshire is a collective of the city and district councils that work together for mutual benefit in addressing fuel poverty. We welcome the introduction of Flexible Eligibility as part of the Energy Company Obligation (ECO) as it will allow us to support additional vulnerable households under broader criteria. 1.4. Fuel Poverty is a serious concern in our county and affects over 19,000 households4 contributing to more than 800 Excess Winter Deaths on average each year.5 Although our collective actions helped reduce fuel poverty across the county by an estimated 1468 households from 2013-2015 however there is still more to be done.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper on the Origins of the MONKS Surname
    monksname.doc The Derivation in England of the Family Names of MONK and MONKS, (and their phonetic variations). Based on research by Peter MONCK.1 Overview The names evolved from William LE MOIGNE, from St Lo in Normandy who came to England with William the Conquerer. In French the name means “the Monk”. King William gave Le Moigne the manor of Owers in Devon, where he settled. In England the name evolved to MOIGNE, MOINE, MOYNE and MOYGNE (with and without the prefix ‘le’). The Latin version of the Norman name, as used in medieval times in the church, was MONACHUS, from which DE MONACHO, MONIAC, MONKYS and the many phonetic variations of MONK and MONKS derived (for example: MONKE(S); MONCK(S); MUNKE(S); MUNCKE (S); MOUNK(S); MOUNKE(S)). A clear evolutionary trail for these early developments of the name is obtained from records associated with property owned by the families over several centuries, as illustrated below. More recently, from the late 18th century, parish records show variations within the one family group (for example children and grandchildren of William MONKS and Ann née FLOOK, who married at Holy Trinity, Stapleton, Gloucestershire, in 1765, were christened variously as MONKS, MONK, and MOUNKS.) Ralph, a son or grandson of William Le Moigne, was held in sufficient esteem by Henry 1st to be created a Grand Sergeant (a member of the inner court) and Larderer- in-Chief to the Kings of England. For this service he was granted 50 hides of land in five manors: Shipton Moigne in Gloucestershire (21 hides); Maddington in Wiltshire (4 hides); Great Easton in Essex (10 hides); Owermoigne in Dorset (10 hides); and Lambourne in Berkshire (5 hides).
    [Show full text]
  • Matter 24 East of Luton Luton Airp
    Examination of the North Hertfordshire Local Plan (2011-2031) Examination hearing sessions: Matter 24 East of Luton Luton Airport Expansion and Major Development Plans and Relationship with Proposed Allocation E1, E2 and E3 (East of Luton) Additional Note for Inspector on behalf of Bloor Homes and The Crown Estate On 2 nd December 2020, having reviewed Examination Document ED212: "Matter 24: East of Luton: Ms Carolyn Cottier's map of major developments East of Luton and proposed housing sites appraisal and mapping in a master plan due to spatial overlap", Mr Berkeley acknowledged that Ms Cottier's representations were detailed and the position potentially complicated. An additional note from Bloor Homes and The Crown Estate was, therefore fair and would be of assistance. Mr Berkeley further indicated that he was interested in a factual clarification on the relationship with the Luton Airport Expansion (Development Consent Order (DCO)), airport related planning applications and the Proposed Allocations E1, E2 and E3 (East of Luton). In this regard there are a number of assertions and comments made in ED212 which are not accepted by Bloor Homes and The Crown Estate but no further comment is made given the Inspector's request for purely factual clarification and is therefore limited to certain parts of ED212 by reference to page numbers. A separate Plans Document should be read alongside these notes. The content below has been checked and verified with Luton Borough Council. Box ED 212 Factual Re sponse Plan s Document Page Reference 1 1 Future Luton relates to a proposed Development Consent Order application which is planned for submission to Plan 1 the Secretary of State for Transport for an expanded London Luton Airport in 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Local Transport Plan
    Report January 2020 Agenda Item 4.1 – Appendix 2 The Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Local Transport Plan Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority 23217301 Report January 2020 The Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Local Transport Plan Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined 28-32 Upper Ground Authority London SE1 9PD The Incubator 2 First Floor Alconbury Weald Enterprise Campus Alconbury Weald Huntingdon Cambridgeshire PE28 4WX +44 20 7910 5000 www.steergroup.com Our ref: 23217301 Steer has prepared this material for Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority. This material may only be used within the context and scope for which Steer has prepared it and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this material without the express and written permission of Steer shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer has prepared this material using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. The Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Local Transport Plan | Report Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 6 Policy alignment ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Huntingdonshire District Council and Cambridge City Council CCTV
    Huntingdonshire District Council and Cambridge City Council CCTV Shared Service Annual Report 2014/15 (For the period 1st July 2014 to 31st March 2015) August 2015 1 Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 2. Governance ............................................................................................................... 3 3. Key Highlights of the Reporting Year ......................................................................... 3 4. Financial Performance ............................................................................................... 4 5. Operations ................................................................................................................. 4 6. Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) .......................................................... 5 7. Out of Hours Service ................................................................................................. 6 8. Cambridgeshire Constabulary ................................................................................... 6 9. Publicity ..................................................................................................................... 6 10. Staffing ...................................................................................................................... 7 11. Equipment ................................................................................................................. 7 12. Re-Deployable
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Statutory Consultation Document
    London Future LuToN Airport Ltd MAKING BEST USE OF OUR RUNWAY A Luton Council company Consultation, June 2018 WWW.FUTURELUTON.LLAL.ORG.UK CONTENTS FOREWORD 01 INTRODUCTION 02 THE AIRPORT TODAY 03 FUTURE LuToN 04 CONSIDERING THE OPTIONS 05 MANAGING THE IMPACTS 06 NEXT STEPS 07 GLOSSARY APPENDICES FOREWORD FROM THE CHAIR OF LONDON LUTON AIRPORT LTD London Luton Airport (LTN) marks its This consultation is the first important We want our communities to thrive and 80th anniversary this year, and there is step in taking this vision forward, as to enjoy the benefits that the growth of much to celebrate. It is the fifth largest it presents options for enabling future LTN will bring. Over the last five years, airport in the UK, and has also been the levels of growth and expansion in the we have provided more than £50m UK’s fastest growing major airport over period up to 2050. for local charities, community and the last five years, handling just under voluntary organisations in Luton and We are consulting on these plans at 16 million passengers in 2017. Over half beyond in communities impacted by this early stage to seek your views and of the flights are to western Europe and airport operations. feedback to help us shape and inform the Mediterranean, with over a third to the proposals for the expansion of We are committed to working with central and eastern Europe. LTN. We plan to consult again next our partners, airlines, our local We, London Luton Airport Limited year on more detailed proposals, communities, statutory bodies and (LLAL), owner of LTN, are proud of its providing a further chance to give the Government when developing success story.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Accounts 2018/19
    Statement of Accounts 2018/19 01 02 03 04 05 Written Core Financial Notes to the Supplementary Glossary Statements and Statements Accounts Statement and Narrative Report Supporting Notes Chief Finance Officer’s Comprehensive Income General Accounting Housing Revenue Glossary of Terms Narrative Report and Expenditure Policies and Judgements Account (HRA) Page 134 Page 4 Statement Page 44 Statements Group Page 36 Page 127 Single Page 37 Statement of Movement in Reserves Comprehensive Income Housing Revenue Responsibilities for Statement and Expenditure Account (HRA) the Statement Group Page 38 Statement Supporting Supporting Notes of Accounts Single Page 39 Notes Page 129 Page 20 Page 52 Annual Governance Balance Sheet Movement in Reserves Collection Fund Statement Group Page 40 Statement Supporting Statements Page 22 Single Page 40 Notes Page 131 Page 66 Independent Auditor’s Cash Flow Statement Balance Sheet Collection Fund Report Group Page 42 Statement Supporting Supporting Notes Page 34 Single Page 42 Notes Page 132 Page 76 Cash Flow Statement Supporting Notes Page 118 Other Supporting Notes Page 120 P age | 2 01 Contents Page Written Narrative Report 4 Statements Statement of Responsibilities for the Statement of 20 and Accounts Narrative Annual Governance Statement 22 Report Independent Auditor’s Report 34 P age | 3 Chief Finance Officer’s Narrative Report Introduction The financial landscape for Local Government continues to be challenging, and especially hard to manage due to Brexit and the ongoing debate on a realistic level of funding required by local authorities to be sustainable. This is clouded further by the uncertainty surrounding business rates retention and the delay of the government’s spending review.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedford Borough Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment
    Bedford Borough Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment Final Report February 2017 Opinion Research Services | The Strand • Swansea • SA1 1AF | 01792 535300 | www.ors.org.uk | [email protected] Opinion Research Services | Bedford Borough Council - GTAA FINAL February 2017 Opinion Research Services | The Strand, Swansea SA1 1AF Steve Jarman | Claire Thomas and Ciara Small enquiries: 01792 535300 · [email protected] · www.ors.org.uk © Copyright February 2017 Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government \licence v 3.0 Contains OS data ©) Crown Copyright (2014) Opinion Research Services | Bedford Borough Council - GTAA FINAL February 2017 Contents 1. Executive Summary ....................................................................................... 1 Introduction and Methodology ................................................................................................................... 1 Key Findings ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Additional Pitch Needs – Gypsies and Travellers .................................................................................. 2 Additional Plot Needs - Travelling Showpeople .................................................................................... 3 Transit Requirements ............................................................................................................................ 4 2. Introduction .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Air Quality Action Plan for the Cambridgeshire Growth Areas
    Air Quality Action Plan for the Cambridgeshire Growth Areas: Cambridge City Council Huntingdonshire District Council South Cambridgeshire District Council 2009 Contact Details: Cambridge City Council: Jo Dicks and Anita Lewis. Environmental Services PO Box 700 Cambridge CB1 0JH Tel: 01223 457890 or 457926 Email: [email protected] [email protected] Huntingdonshire District Council: Toby Lewis. Environmental Services Pathfinder House St Mary’s Street Huntingdon PE29 3TN Tel: 01480 388365 Email: [email protected] South Cambridgeshire District Council: Susan Walford and Adam Finch. Health & Environmental Services South Cambridgeshire Hall Cambourne Business Park Cambourne CB23 6EA Tel: 01954 713124 or 713319 Email: [email protected] [email protected] Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Legislative background................................................................................... 4 1.2 Joint approach................................................................................................ 5 1.3 Description of area covered by the Joint Air Quality Action Plan.................... 6 Figure 1.1 Location of the Local Authorities ........................................................ 7 Figure 1.2 Air Quality Management Areas in the south of Cambridgeshire........
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report May 2018
    Interim Report May 2018 www.cpier.org.uk Foreword FROM THE CHAIR OF THE REVIEW, DAME KATE BARKER The Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Independent Economic Review (CPIER) is pleased to present the interim report, which has been led by the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Independent Economic Commission (CPIEC). It is co-funded by the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority, the Business Board of the Combined Authority, and Cambridge Ahead. This is of course the Commission’s report. The views expressed have been developed as independent – as our funders asked us to do. The Commission is now roughly at the half way stage in the review. We have gathered a great deal of evidence. Much of the evidence we have is data on the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough economy. Most of what we have now is from published sources, and we have commissioned a range of new research too. Some of that is available to us now and informs this report. Much of the research is still underway and will be reflected in the final report. At this stage, we have not set out a wholly definitive analysis of where the economy of the area is heading and what should be done about it. This is more our view of where the economy is today and how it got there, an important starting point for the review. While the area the review has responsibility for is defined by its administrative geography, we are primarily concerned with the economics of the area, and we therefore refrain from artificially simplifying, or forcing together, the economic geography.
    [Show full text]