Judge Manfred Lachs (1914-1993)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Judge Manfred Lachs (1914-1993) IN MEMORIAM: JUDGE MANFRED LACHS (1914-1993) THE UN YEARS: LACHS THE DIPLOMAT Judge Manfred Lachs died on January 14, 1993, in his seventy-ninth year. He had an unparalleled career in international law for nearly fifty years. A judge of the International Court of Justice for twenty-six years—and a past President—he served longer than anyone else on the Court or its predecessor court. Before his election to the Court in 1966, he played a leading role in the major international legal organs of the United Nations. He was also a scholar and teacher, the author of numerous books and articles. Fluent in at least five languages, he moved easily in international circles, with grace and discretion, a natural conciliator. It is no wonder that he received numerous honors from all over the world, many in this country (including honorary membership in the American Society of Interna­ tional Law). Manfred Lachs was also a very private person. In the forty-six years I knew him, he said little about his personal life. But it seems appropriate here to note how his own life was marked by the political turbulence of the twentieth century, and its human tragedies. He was born on the eve of World War I in a town (Stanislau) in eastern Galicia, then part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, a few years later part of Poland, and in 1939 made part of the Soviet Union by the Nazi-Soviet pact; today it lies in the Republic of Ukraine. Out of this small, poor, polyglot region came a number of eminent international lawyers. I first learned this singular fact from Sir Hersch Lauterpacht, himself from that area, back in 1948. Today Judge Lachs (and, I should add, Professor Louis B. Sohn) would be included among the notable international lawyers who had their origins in Galicia. Manfred Lachs's own formation was Polish in the interwar years. The son of a lawyer, he received his law degree from Krakow University. He took pride in Polish culture and intellectual history, and in the Jewish contributions to that history. He broadened his own legal education with studies in Vienna, in France at Nancy, then at the London School of Economics and in Cambridge. He often expressed his admiration and affection for English law. When World War II broke out, he was luckily in London, escaping the tragic fate of his family, which was completely wiped out by the Holocaust. War crimes were the subject of his first book (1945) and he began his international legal career as one of the Polish exile government's delegates to the United Nations War Crimes Commission that sat in London from 1944 to 1946. Later he took part in the Nuremberg prosecution regarding Nazi acts in Poland. His association with the United Nations began in 1945 as a Polish representa­ tive to legal bodies and, for the next two decades, he was an influential and popular figure in the Organization and in the major international conferences of a legal character. He was elected three times (with general support) as Chairman of the Legal Committee of the General Assembly, a unique distinction. He was also elected to the International Law Commission and, for a number of years, he chaired the Legal Sub-Committee on Outer Space, where he was influential in building the consensus that resulted in the major features of outer space law. He retained his interest in that area—and was a leader in the international scholarly activities concerning space law. 414 1993] IN MEMORIAM: JUDGE MANFRED LACHS 415 A salient feature of Lachs's career which cannot be overlooked is his service as a Polish delegate in the decades of Soviet domination of Poland and in the Cold War period. As a Polish diplomat, Lachs adhered to the official line, whatever his personal views may have been. His diplomatic skill, urbanity and Western lan­ guages were assets to the Soviet bloc. Surely there were personal tensions for Lachs. He clearly welcomed the occasional opening for some agreement between the blocs—but as a bridge, he was more likely to be stepped on than to connect. Nevertheless, he did manage to maintain a broad range of Western friends and intellectual contacts. He developed a friendship with Richard Nixon and was his guest at the White House. His contacts with universities in the United States and other Western countries were extensive and probably viewed with some suspicion by the apparatchiks in the East. Yet even in the Cold War some significant agreements were reached. Lachs had a role in nuclear disarmament; he was a Polish delegate in the negotiation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and a leading proponent and drafter of the Polish initiative for a nuclear-free zone in Europe (the Rapacki Plan). Together with his active role in the United Nations, Lachs carried on an academic career at Warsaw University and fostered the careers of many younger Polish international lawyers. His strong interest in teaching was manifested in his The Teacher in International Law, a learned and distinctively multicultural book that received the ASIL award for creative scholarship in 1982. He also had an influential role in the Hague Academy and the Institute of International Law. Lachs's twenty-six years as a judge merit more extended analysis than is possible here. We have reason to infer that he was a particularly influential judge in building majorities in the Court. In his long period on the Court, he rarely dis­ sented—in fact, only twice. One such dissent, in the North Sea Continental Shelf cases, contains a penetrating discussion of the creation of customary law, which should be required reading for students. The record also shows that he differed with his Soviet colleague on several occasions, a fact worth noting in view of the pointed aspersions on his independence made by the U.S. Department of State after the Nicaragua case and similar criticism made in ASIL meetings. Lachs was deeply wounded by these attacks and made his feelings clear in separate opinions and legal journals, including this one.1 Lachs's positive contribution to the Court was noteworthy in the Barcelona Traction case for reference to the ergo omnes principle as applied to human rights and in the advisory opinion on Namibia for reference to human rights and self- determination. In his last separate opinion, in the case concerning the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie, he returned to a problem that had long concerned him regarding the blurring of political and legal disputes and the necessity for the Court and the Security Council each to perform its functions without prejudicing the other's powers. While he once again recognized that the Court is the desig­ nated "guardian of legality," he also stressed the binding powers of the Security Council and its broad mandate.2 With his usual optimism, he passed over the conflict raised, apparently content to leave the solution to particular decisions taken in specific circumstances. 1 See his letter to the editor, 84 AJIL 231 (1990). 8 Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. U.S.), Provisional Measures, 1992 ICJ REP. 114, 139 (Order of Apr. 14). 416 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW [Vol. 87:414 In his study of the teachers of international law, Lachs found value in all of them—naturalists, positivists, Marxists, pragmatists, apologists and Utopians. In contrast, he said little about the much harsher world which he well knew—the world of tyranny, racism, anti-Semitism, violence and chicanery. It is probably no exaggeration to suggest that his personal life was sustained by his dedication to the ideal of international law. It is entirely fitting that readers of this Journal, along with others in all parts of our profession, should now honor his memory, for his achievement and its hopes for international law. OSCAR SCHACHTER* ON THE BENCH: LACHS THE JUDGE Manfred Lachs died in The Hague on January 14, 1993, at the age of 78. He was the longest-serving judge in the history of the International Court of Justice and the Permanent Court of International Justice, and one of the most distin­ guished. Lachs was born in Stanistawow (Stanislau) in what became Poland, in 1914. He received the LL.M. and LL.D. degrees from the University of Krakow in 1937. He studied at the University of Vienna, received a doctorate from the University of Nancy in 1939, and was fortunate enough to be abroad when Poland was engulfed by the Nazi invasion and occupation, in the course of which every other member of his family was murdered. In England, Lachs pursued studies at the London School of Economics and joined the Polish government-in-exile, initially as secre­ tary of a member of the Polish National Council. While on military service, he wrote his first book, a slender volume entitled War Crimes (1945). Not long after, he was attached to the prosecution at the Nuremberg Trials, where he played a major role in drafting the indictment for Nazi criminal acts in Poland. Lachs was one of the small number of "London Poles" to return to Poland after the war. He was one of a still-smaller number to remain, adapt and prosper. Indeed, he became the only one of the London Poles to achieve and then main­ tain high position in Communist Poland. At the same time, throughout his long professional and personal life, Lachs was to nurture his many ties in the West. His years in England had particular influence upon him: on his legal thought and expression (he was fond of quoting English Law Lords and of brightening his speeches with English anecdotes), and on his dress.
Recommended publications
  • Applicant Memorial: Concordia and Landia
    MANFRED LACHS SPACE LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2008 Team No. 2 IN THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE AT THE PEACE PALACE, THE HAGUE CASE CONCERNING THE CONTINUED PROVISION OF LIFELINE SATELLITE SERVICES TO COUNTRIES IN THE FACE OF SATELLITE OPERATOR INSOLVENCY THE STATE OF CONCORDIA THE STATE OF LANDIA V. THE KINGDOM OF USURPIA ON SUBMISSION TO THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE - MEMORIAL FOR THE JOINT APPLICANTS - THE STATE OF CONCORDIA THE STATE OF LANDIA MANFRED LACHS MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2008 Team No. 2 IN THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE AT THE PEACE PALACE, THE HAGUE Case concerning the Continued Provision of Lifeline Satellite Services to Countries In the Face of Satellite Operator Insolvency Concordia and Landia v. Usurpia ON SUBMISSION TO THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE MEMORIAL FOR THE JOINT APPLICANTS CONCORDIA AND LANDIA TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.................................................................................................. V QUESTIONS PRESENTED.................................................................................................. XI STATEMENT OF FACTS .................................................................................................. XII SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS ...................................................................................... XXV ARGUMENT ............................................................................................................................ 1 I. USURPIA’S DECISION TO LICENSE AND THEN AUTHORIZE THE RELOCATION OF THE SATELSAT-18
    [Show full text]
  • Manfred Lachs Space Law Moot Court Competition 2015
    MANFRED LACHS SPACE LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2015 Team No. 3 IN THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE AT THE PEACE PALACE, THE HAGUE CASE CONCERNING PLANETARY DEFENSE THE SOVEREIGN PEOPLES INDEPENDENT DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC (SPIDR) v. THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF ADVENTURA (URA) ON SUBMISSION TO THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE MEMORIAL FOR THE APPLICANT THE SOVEREIGN PEOPLES INDEPENDENT DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC (SPIDR) TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................. v TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ............................................................................................................. vi A. IMPORTANT LEGAL DOCUMENTS ........................................................................................ vi B. TREATIES AND INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS ................................................................... vi C. INTERNATIONAL LAW CASES ............................................................................................ vii i. International Court of Justice (I.C.J.) ................................................................... vii ii. Permanent Court of International Justice (P.C.I.J.) .......................................... viii iii. Arbitral Tribunals .................................................................................................. viii iv. National Court Decisions .......................................................................................... ix v. Other Judicial Decisions ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Europe Before the World Court: “Thumbelina” of the International Legal Order?**
    Miloš Hrnjaz PhD,* doi:10.5937/zrpfni1982099H Assistant Professor, оригинални научни рад University of Belgrade, Faculty of Political Science UDK: 341.6(4-11) Рад примљен: 25.12.2018. Рад прихваћен: 22.02.2019. EASTERN EUROPE BEFORE THE WORLD COURT: “THUMBELINA” OF THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ORDER?** Abstract: The cases referred to the World Court (the ICJ and he PCIJ) that arose as a consequence of the events which occurred in Eastern Europe, as well as some brilliant albeit mutually very different international jurists from this part of Europe, had a significant impact on the development of international law. The article provides strong evidence that the significance of Eastern Europe issues and the Court judges coming from this region is highly disproportionate to the rather minuscule size of the Eastern Euro- pean region. This importance is proven by several quantitative and quali- tative indicators summarized in the concluding remarks of the article: the number of Eastern European cases brought before the Court, the number of Eastern European judges who served in the Court, the number of judges from Eastern Europe who were Presidents of the Court, the number of years during which Presidents of the Court were from Eastern Europe, the impact of some of the judges on the substance of key Court decisions, etc. Keywords: International Court of Justice (ICJ), Permanent Court of Inter- national Justice (PCIJ), Eastern Europe, development of international law, ICJ judges. * [email protected] ** This article is the result of research on the project “Political Identity of Serbia in a Global and Regional Context” (no.179076), funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Court of Justice
    THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE THE POSITION OF THIRD PARTIES RECONSIDERED BASHIRIDEEN IDDRISU KORAY Thesis submitted to the London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London, for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Law September 1991 UMI Number: U048642 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U048642 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ^<\7-oO Library British Library of Political and Economic Science ABSTRACT This thesis seeks to investigate the impact of the decisions of the International Court of Justice on third parties from the perspective of the general and specific guarantees available for the protection of their interests under the Court's Statute. In the first chapter, the general protection extended to third parties is considered from the viewpoint of the general principle of the relative effect of judicial decisions, their value as building blocks of the Court's jurisprudence and their role as a subsidiary legal source. The second and third chapters are devoted to a critical analysis of the nature, scope, effect and conditions for the operation of the specific third party guarantees, namely, intervention for the purpose of the protection of the interest of a third party and intervention when the construction of a convention is in issue in a pending case.
    [Show full text]
  • Information on the Activities of International Intergovernmental and Non-Governmental Organizations Relating to Space Law
    A/AC.105/C.2/2018/CRP.13 6 April 2018 English only Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space Legal Subcommittee Fifty-seventh session Vienna, 9–20 April 2018 Item 5 of the provisional agenda* Information on the activities of international intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations relating to space law Information on the activities of international intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations relating to space law Note by the Secretariat I. Introduction 1. The present document was prepared by the Secretariat on the basis of information received from the International Institute of Space Law. __________________ * A/AC.105/C.2/L.303. V.18-02111 (E) *1802111* A/AC.105/C.2/2018/CRP.13 II. Reply received from international intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations International Institute of Space Law [Original: English] [29 March 2018] 1. International Institute of Space Law Founded in 1960, the International Institute of Space Law (IISL) is an independent non-governmental organization dedicated to fostering the development of space law. The membership of the Institute is composed of individuals and institutions from almost fifty countries elected on the basis of their contributions to the field of space law or other social sciences related to space activities. In addition, prospective membership is open to students and young professionals with a demonstrated interest in space law. The purposes and objectives of IISL include the promotion of further development of space law and expansion of the rule of law in the exploration and use of outer space for peaceful purposes, the holding of meetings, colloquiums and competitions on juridical and social science aspects of space activities, the preparation or commissioning of studies and reports, the publication of books, proceedings, reports and position papers, and the cooperation with appropriate international organizations and national institutions in the field of space law.
    [Show full text]
  • Madame Chair, First of All, on Behalf of Polish Delegation, I Would Like To
    Madame Chair, First of all, on behalf of Polish Delegation, I would like to congratulate you with your election to the Chair of this Committee. I deeply believe that your knowledge, experience and leadership will contribute to the success of this meeting. Madame Chair, Distinguished Delegates, Polish interest in Space Exploration can be dated as early as 1954, when Polish Astronautical Society was admitted to the International Astronautical Federation. Poland is also Member of UNCOPUOS from the very beginning and played important role in the work on this Committee. I should mention leading contribution of Professor Manfred Lachs, from Warsaw University, on preparation and endorsement of the UN Outer Space Law. At the beginning of Space Era, Poland organized two important World events. In 1963 COSPAR General Assembly was held in Warsaw and next year, 1964, International Astronautical Congress was also held in Warsaw. More recently at the Warsaw University of Technology COSPAR 2000 General Assembly gathered nearly 2000 participants and we are now applying to held in Poland future meeting of COSPAR as well as International Astronautical Congress. Soon after beginning of Space Era we have been involved in designing and launching of more than 200 sounding rockets “Meteor”, from which one reached Von Karman limit of Space. Poland already participated in 80 space missions including instrumentation built by the Institute of Aviation in early seventies of last century, including radio-spectrograph on board of Intercosmos Kopernik-500, launched on the occasion of the 500 Anniversary of birth of famous Polish Astronomer – Mikołaj Kopernik. Many other instruments, which were built by the Center of Space Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences, on board of international spacecrafts are on orbits of Venus, Mars or on surface of Saturn’s moon Titan and on comet Czuriumow-Gierasimienko.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Space Law
    JOURNAL OF SPACE LAW VOLUME 22, NUMBERS 1 & 2 1994 JOURNAL OF SPACE LAW A journal devoted to the legal problems arising out of human activities in outer space VOLUME 22 1994 NUMBERS I &2 EDITORIAL BOARD AND ADVISORS BERGER, HAROLD GALLOWAY, Ell.ENE Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Washington, D.C. B6CKSTlEGEL, KARL-HEINZ GOEDHUIS, D. Cologne, Germany London, England, BOUREr.. Y, MICHEL G. HE,QIZHI Luzille par Blere, France Beijing, China COCCA, ALDO ARMANDO JASENTULIYANA, NANDASIRI Buenes Aires, Argentina Vienna, Austria DEMBLING, PAUL G. KOPAL, VLADIMIR Washington, D. C. Prague, Czechoslovakia DlEDERIKS-VERSCHOOR, I.H. PH. MCDOUGAL, MYRES S. Baarn, Holland New Haven, Connecticut FASAN, ERNST VERESHCHETIN, V.s. Neunkirchen, Austria Moscow, U.S.S.R. FINCH, EDWARD R., JR. ZANOTTI, ISIDORO New York, N.Y. Washington, D.C. STEPHEN GOROVE, Chainnan University, Mississippi All correspondance should be directed to the JOURNAL OF SPACE LAW, P.O. Box 308, University, Mississippi 38677. Tel. 601-234-2391. Fax: 601-232-7010. The subscription rate for 1994 is $74.45 (doinestic) and $79.95· (foreign) for two isSues combined. Single issues for other years may be ordered at $40 per issue (postage and handling included). Copyright © JOURNAL OF SPACE LAW 1994 Suggested abbreviation: J. SPACE L. JOURNAL OF SPACE LAW A journal devoted to the legal problems arising out of human activities in outer space VOLUME 22 1994 NUMBERS 1 &2 CONTENTS Announcement iv Judge Manfred Lachs: An Obituary (I.H.Ph. Diederiks-Verschoor) 1 ARTICLES Regulation of Space Salvage Operations: Possibilities for the Future (N. Jasenruliyana) 5 The International Telecommunication Union and Development Francis Lyall) 23 Judge Manfred Lachs and the Principle of Jus Cog/ms (Carl Q.
    [Show full text]
  • 19Th Manfred Lachs Space Law Moot Court Competition 2010 WORLD FINALS
    INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SPACE LAW 19th Manfred Lachs Space Law Moot Court Competition 2010 WORLD FINALS Thursday, 30 September, 2010, 3–6 p.m. Regional Court (of West Bohemia) in Pilsen, Czech Republic www.iislweb.org/lachsmoot WORLD FINALS 19th Manfred Lachs Space Law Moot Court Competition 2010 CONTENTS The International Institute of Space Law 2 Board of Directors 2009–2010 3 Moot Court Committee 5 Judge Manfred Lachs 6 The Competition 7 Program 8 Summary of the Problem 9 Participants in the Regional Rounds 10 Contact Details for the Regional Rounds 12 Winners of the Regional Rounds 13 Judges 14 Awards 15 Addresses 16 Further Reading 16 Sponsors 17 2009 Winners: National Law School of India University, Bangalore, India Copyright 2010 © IISL. All rights reserved. Thursday, 30 September, 2010, 3–6 pm. | Pilsen, Czech Republic 1 19th Manfred Lachs Space Law Moot Court Competition 2010 WORLD FINALS WORLD FINALS 19th Manfred Lachs Space Law Moot Court Competition 2010 THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SPACE LAW BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2009–2010 Founded in 1960, the International Institute of Space Law (IISL) is an independent OFFICERS non-governmental organization dedicated to fostering the development of space law in partnership with various international and domestic institutions. The membership of the IISL is composed of individuals and institutions from more than forty countries who have been elected on the basis of their contributions to the fi eld of space law or other social sciences related to space activities. The IISL holds its annual Colloquium on current issues in space law at the International Astronautical Congress (IAC) and the Colloquium Proceedings are published each year by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA).
    [Show full text]
  • Judge Manfred Lachs and His Role in International Adjudication
    Judge Manfred Lachs and His Role in International Adjudication Karolina Wierczyńska* I am honoured to present to you Manfred Lachs, one of the most famous Polish jurists in international law. He easily ranks among such great Polish legal scholars as Rafael Lemkin, who coined the word genocide, or the great diplomat Krzysztof Skubiszewski. Manfred Lachs was born1 in 1914, in Stanislawów in Galicia, which was then a part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. When World War I ended, the town was within the borders of newly independent Poland (and later incorporated into the Soviet Union, while today it is Ivano-Frankovsk in Ukraine). Lachs studied at the Jagiellonian University of Cracow where he received a Master of Laws, and in 1937 a Doctorate of Laws. Two years later he also received a Doctorate at the University of Nancy in France. Lachs also studied at the London School of Economics.2 When the World War II started he was happily abroad, happily because all his family who stayed in Poland were murdered during the Holocaust. His first book, published in 1945, focused on the issue of war crimes, and it was during this period that he started his international career. Not long after the war he took part in Nuremberg War Trials, serving as one of the authors of the indictment for Nazi crimes in Poland and also working as a member of the Sixth Legal Committee on the Genocide Convention. In the 1950s and 1960s he served as Polish representative in the legal bodies of the United Nations (UN), including the Sixth Legal Committee of the General Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • International Court of Justice
    Coordinates: 52°05′11.8″N 4°17′43.8″E International Court of Justice The International Court of Justice (ICJ),[1] sometimes International Court of Justice called the World Court, is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations (UN). The ICJ settles disputes between states Cour internationale de justice and gives advisory opinions on international legal issues referred to it by the UN. Through its opinions and rulings, it serves as a source of international law. The ICJ is the successor of the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ), which was established by the League of Nations in 1920. After the Second World War, both the League and the PCIJ were succeeded by the United International Court of Justice Seal Nations and ICJ, respectively. The Statute of the ICJ draws heavily from that of its predecessor, and the latter's decisions Established 1945 (PCIJ dissolved in remain valid. All members of the UN are party to the ICJ 1946) Statute. Location The Hague, Netherlands Coordinates 52°05′11.8″N 4°17′43.8″E The ICJ comprises a panel of 15 judges elected by the General Assembly and Security Council for nine-year terms. Authorized UN Charter · ICJ Statute The court is seated in the Peace Palace in The Hague, by Netherlands, making it the only principal U.N. organ not Judge term 9 years located in New York City.[2] Its official working languages length are English and French. Number of 15 positions Website www.icj-cij.org (https://w Contents ww.icj-cij.org/en) President History The Permanent Court of International Justice Currently
    [Show full text]
  • IISL Moot Court Programme 2014 Draft 1
    INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SPACE LAW ! ! ! ! ! 23rd Manfred Lachs Space Law Moot Court Competition 2014 ! WORLD FINALS ! Thursday, 2 October 2014 ! Ministry of the Attorney General, Ontario Court of Justice, Old City Hall ! http://www.iislweb.org/lachsmoot ! Georgetown University Winners of World Finals 2013, Beijing, China Contents ! The International Institute of Space Law 2 Board of Directors 3 Moot Court Committee 5 Judge Manfred Lachs 7 The Competition 8 Summary of the Problem 10 Participants in the Regional Rounds 12 Winners of the Regional Rounds 16 Judges for the World Finals 17 Program World Finals and IISL Annual Dinner 19 Awards for World Finals 20 Contact Details for the Regional Rounds 23 Addresses 23 Sponsors 24 Further Reading 26 ! ! COPYRIGHT 2014 © IISL. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. The International Institute of Space Law Founded in 1960, the International Institute of Space Law (IISL) is an independent non- governmental organization dedicated to fostering the development of space law in partnership with various international and domestic institutions. The membership of the IISL is composed of individuals and institutions from more than forty countries elected on the basis of their contributions to the field of space law or other social sciences related to space activities. In addition, prospective membership is open to students and young professionals with a demonstrated interest in space law. The IISL holds its annual Colloquium on current issues in space law at the International Astronautical Congress (IAC). During the IAC the IISL also co-organizes annual Scientific- Legal Roundtables with the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA). The IISL Proceedings, containing the Colloquium papers as well as numerous other materials, are published each year by Eleven International Publishing.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Th Manfred Lachs International Conference
    Centre for Research in Air and Space Law Centre de recherche en droit aérien et spatial th Celebrating the 65 Anniversary of the Institute of Air & Space Law 4TH MANFRED LACHS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONFLICTS IN SPACE AND THE RULE OF LAW 27-28 May 2016 Montreal, Quebec, Canada Hotel Best Western Ville-Marie Program, Abstracts and Biographies Sponsored by The Erin J. C. Arsenault Fund & Useful Contact Information Conference Location: Hotel Best Western Ville-Marie 20th Floor, Room Mont Royal I 3407, Peel Street, QC H3A 1W7 Dinner Location (27 May 2016): McGill Faculty Club, 3450, McTavish Street, H34 0E5 Contact: Tel: [+1] 514-398-5095 (Maria D’ Amico – McGill IASL) E-mails: [email protected] [email protected] 2 4TH MANFRED LACHS CONFERENCE ON CONFLICTS IN SPACE AND THE RULE OF LAW TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS………………………………………………………………………………….3 BACKGROUND…………………………………………………………………………………………...5 CONFERENCE PROGRAM COMMITTEE…………………………………………………..…………6 COLLABORATING INSTITUTIONS……………………………………………………………………7 CONFERENCE PROGRAM…………………………………………………………………………...…8 ABSTRACTS………………………………………………………………………….………………….16 BIOGRAPHIES…………………………………………………………………………………………...38 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS…………………………………………………………………………….…50 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 4 4TH MANFRED LACHS CONFERENCE ON CONFLICTS IN SPACE AND THE RULE OF LAW BACKGROUND Almost sixty years of exploration and use of outer space have brought unprecedented benefits to humankind. Humanity now depends heavily upon space, and even a single “day without satellites ” would have disastrous impacts for everyone on Earth, particularly those who increasingly rely on space assets. However, many concerns exist today across a broad spectrum of issues with regard to space activities that impact upon notions of national and global security. Space technologies, activities and issues involve States, commercial space enterprises, non-State actors and possibly even terrorist organizations.
    [Show full text]