DOCSLIB.ORG

Surface and Groundwater Interactions: a Review of Coupling Strategies in Detailed Domain Models

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Surface and Groundwater Interactions: a Review of Coupling Strategies in Detailed Domain Models hydrology Review Surface and Groundwater Interactions: A Review of Coupling Strategies in Detailed Domain Models Arefin Haque 1, Amgad Salama 1, Kei Lo 2 and Peng Wu 1,* 1 Environmental Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada; [email protected] (A.H.); [email protected] (A.S.) 2 Hydrology and Groundwater Services, Saskatchewan Water Security Agency, Moose Jaw, SK S6H 7X9, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: In groundwater numerical simulations, the interactions between surface and groundwater have received great attention due to difficulties related to their validation and calibration due to the dynamic exchange occurring at the soil–water interface. The interaction is complex at small scales. However, at larger scales, the interaction is even more complicated, and has never been fully addressed. A clear understanding of the coupling strategies between the surface and groundwater is essential in order to develop numerical models for successful simulations. In the present review, two of the most commonly used coupling strategies in detailed domain models—namely, fully-coupled and loosely-coupled techniques—are reviewed and compared. The advantages and limitations of each modelling scheme are discussed. This review highlights the strategies to be considered in the development of groundwater flow models that are representative of real-world conditions between surface and groundwater interactions at regional scales. Keywords: coupling strategies; groundwater; interaction; fully coupled scheme; loosely coupled scheme Citation: Haque, A.; Salama, A.; Lo, K.; Wu, P. Surface and Groundwater Interactions: A Review of Coupling Strategies in Detailed Domain 1. Introduction Models. Hydrology 2021, 8, 35. Water security is an emergent issue in the world due to climate change and variability, https://doi.org/10.3390/ and increasing water demands due to population growth and economic development [1]. hydrology8010035 Both surface water and groundwater are, inevitably, resources that are needed in order to meet future water demands. Groundwater is widely used in the national economies Received: 30 December 2020 of many countries for different purposes, such as potable and industrial water supply, Accepted: 14 February 2021 irrigation, and mineral water. Fresh groundwater is of particular importance as the main Published: 23 February 2021 source of public water in the domestic and drinking water balance. To date, groundwater is the main source of potable water in most European countries and in the United States, Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral which accounts for 75% of municipal water supply system [2]. Irrigation has grown rapidly with regard to jurisdictional claims in over the past 50 years, and approximately 40% of the irrigated regions of the world are pre- published maps and institutional affil- iations. dominantly governed by groundwater resource [3]. However, in recent years, the depletion of groundwater has become a concern due to overexploitation. A greater understanding is needed to better manage the limited water resources, especially in drought-prone areas. There is a need to better understand the interactions between groundwater and surface wa- ter, which is fundamentally an integrated feature in the hydrologic cycle. These interactions Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. could be influenced by both natural and anthropogenic processes [4]. Recently, research has Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. focused on the proper selection of models that accounts for surface and groundwater inter- This article is an open access article actions coupled into a single framework. However, there are many restrictions associated distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons with this approach. There are considerable fluctuations of surface and groundwater inter- Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// actions at the soil–water interface due to the heterogeneous nature of the porous medium creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ with time, along with the variabilities due to climate change. The diversity of aquifer types, 4.0/). along with recharge and groundwater flow conditions, and the extensive range of river Hydrology 2021, 8, 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8010035 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/hydrology Hydrology 2021, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 16 diversity of aquifer types, along with recharge and groundwater flow conditions, and the extensive range of river flow circumstances provide the ingredients for a complex system of interactions, which heightens the need for robust modelling and solution methodolo- gies [5]. Surface water models are being used to understand surface water systems by includ- Hydrology 2021ing, 8 ,possible 35 deviations due to both natural and human influences. The interrelation and2 of 16 coupling among various subsystems of the hydrological cycle has been noted by many pioneer researchers in the process of the physical and mathematical description of the flow processes [6].flow The circumstances first physically-based provide the ingredients and coupled for a complex model, system Système of interactions, Hydrologique which Européen (SHE), washeightens developed the need primarily for robustmodelling based on and fundamentals solution methodologies of surface [5]. water flow. The United States GeologicalSurface water Survey models (USGS) are being PRMS used (Precipitation-Runoff to understand surface water Modelling systems by Sys- includ- tem) and Nationaling Oceanic possible and deviations Atmospheric due to both Administration natural and human (NOAA)’s influences. National The interrelation Weather and coupling among various subsystems of the hydrological cycle has been noted by many Service models [7]pioneer are the researchers recent developments in the process ofof thesurface physical water and models. mathematical The groundwater description of the flow models haveflow the processesability to [ 6simulate]. The first predicted physically-based impacts and from coupled over-exploitation, model, Système Hydrologique to sim- ulate the fate andEurop transportéen (SHE), of wasa contaminate developed primarily plume, based and onto fundamentalsforecast the ofvariation surface water of the flow. groundwater levelsThe Unitedwith Statestime Geologicaldue to climatic Survey (USGS) variability. PRMS (Precipitation-Runoff However, the traditional Modelling Sys- tem) and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)’s National Weather groundwater flowService models models neglect [7] are the the incorporat recent developmentsion of surface of surface water water flux models. into The the groundwater subsur- face environment.flow MikeSHE models have and the SHETRAN ability to simulate were further predicted developed impacts from and over-exploitation, applied with to both surface and simulategroundwater the fate flow and transport[8–10]. of a contaminate plume, and to forecast the variation of From the literature,the groundwater it has been levels noticed with time that due the to modelling climatic variability. and simulation However, of the ground- traditional groundwater flow models neglect the incorporation of surface water flux into the subsur- water and surface water interaction have been conducted by many researchers [11–14]. face environment. MikeSHE and SHETRAN were further developed and applied with Multiple factors haveboth surfacebeen reported and groundwater that co flowuld [influence8–10]. the interaction between ground and surface water, suchFrom as the hydro-climatic literature, it has variables; been noticed physiographic that the modelling structure; and simulation differences of ground- in the head betweenwater the and catchment surface water surface interaction water have and been conductedgroundwater; by many and researchers the surface [11–14 and]. Mul- groundwater flowtiple geometry factors have [15,16]. been reportedThe mo thatdeling could of influence flows and the interactiontransport betweenphenomena ground as and surface water, such as hydro-climatic variables; physiographic structure; differences in the discrete groundwaterhead betweensystems the has catchment been achieved surface water well and by groundwater; relatively and simpler the surface approaches and ground- [15,17]. However,water the modelling flow geometry process [15,16]. is The complicated modeling of flowsby the and inclusion transport phenomenaof surface as water discrete and groundwatergroundwater interaction. systems Ever-present has been achievedinteractions well bybetween relatively groundwater simpler approaches and sur- [15,17]. face water are a concernHowever, due the modellingto the continuous process is complicatedflow of groundwater by the inclusion into of rivers surface [5]. water The and groundwater interaction. Ever-present interactions between groundwater and surface wa- integration of groundwater and surface water interaction could be classified in many dif- ter are a concern due to the continuous flow of groundwater into rivers [5]. The integration ferent ways. Figureof groundwater 1 illustrates and a surface schematic water interaction of the different could be classifiedavailable in manymodelling different ap- ways. proaches. It servesFigure as the1 illustrates foundation a schematic and framework of the different for the available present modelling review. approaches. The objectives It serves of the present reviewas the are foundation to compare and framework the coup forling
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A GIS-Based Software to Simulate Groundwater Nitrate Load from Septic Systems to Surface Water Bodies
    Computers & Geosciences 52 (2013) 108–116 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Computers & Geosciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cageo ArcNLET: A GIS-based software to simulate groundwater nitrate load from septic systems to surface water bodies J. Fernando Rios a, Ming Ye b,n, Liying Wang b, Paul Z. Lee c, Hal Davis d, Rick Hicks c a Department of Geography, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA b Department of Scientific Computing, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA c Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee, FL, USA d 2625 Vergie Court, Tallahassee, FL 32303, USA article info abstract Article history: Onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS), or septic systems, can be a significant source of nitrates Received 17 June 2012 in groundwater and surface water. The adverse effects that nitrates have on human and environmental Received in revised form health have given rise to the need to estimate the actual or potential level of nitrate contamination. 4 October 2012 With the goal of reducing data collection and preparation costs, and decreasing the time required to Accepted 5 October 2012 produce an estimate compared to complex nitrate modeling tools, we developed the ArcGIS-based Available online 16 October 2012 Nitrate Load Estimation Toolkit (ArcNLET) software. Leveraging the power of geographic information Keywords: systems (GIS), ArcNLET is an easy-to-use software capable of simulating nitrate transport in ground- Nitrate transport water and estimating long-term nitrate loads from groundwater to surface water bodies. Data Screening model requirements are reduced by using simplified models of groundwater flow and nitrate transport which Denitrification consider nitrate attenuation mechanisms (subsurface dispersion and denitrification) as well as spatial Septic system Nitrogen variability in the hydraulic parameters and septic tank distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Models and Their Evaluation
    8 Climate Models and Their Evaluation Coordinating Lead Authors: David A. Randall (USA), Richard A. Wood (UK) Lead Authors: Sandrine Bony (France), Robert Colman (Australia), Thierry Fichefet (Belgium), John Fyfe (Canada), Vladimir Kattsov (Russian Federation), Andrew Pitman (Australia), Jagadish Shukla (USA), Jayaraman Srinivasan (India), Ronald J. Stouffer (USA), Akimasa Sumi (Japan), Karl E. Taylor (USA) Contributing Authors: K. AchutaRao (USA), R. Allan (UK), A. Berger (Belgium), H. Blatter (Switzerland), C. Bonfi ls (USA, France), A. Boone (France, USA), C. Bretherton (USA), A. Broccoli (USA), V. Brovkin (Germany, Russian Federation), W. Cai (Australia), M. Claussen (Germany), P. Dirmeyer (USA), C. Doutriaux (USA, France), H. Drange (Norway), J.-L. Dufresne (France), S. Emori (Japan), P. Forster (UK), A. Frei (USA), A. Ganopolski (Germany), P. Gent (USA), P. Gleckler (USA), H. Goosse (Belgium), R. Graham (UK), J.M. Gregory (UK), R. Gudgel (USA), A. Hall (USA), S. Hallegatte (USA, France), H. Hasumi (Japan), A. Henderson-Sellers (Switzerland), H. Hendon (Australia), K. Hodges (UK), M. Holland (USA), A.A.M. Holtslag (Netherlands), E. Hunke (USA), P. Huybrechts (Belgium), W. Ingram (UK), F. Joos (Switzerland), B. Kirtman (USA), S. Klein (USA), R. Koster (USA), P. Kushner (Canada), J. Lanzante (USA), M. Latif (Germany), N.-C. Lau (USA), M. Meinshausen (Germany), A. Monahan (Canada), J.M. Murphy (UK), T. Osborn (UK), T. Pavlova (Russian Federationi), V. Petoukhov (Germany), T. Phillips (USA), S. Power (Australia), S. Rahmstorf (Germany), S.C.B. Raper (UK), H. Renssen (Netherlands), D. Rind (USA), M. Roberts (UK), A. Rosati (USA), C. Schär (Switzerland), A. Schmittner (USA, Germany), J. Scinocca (Canada), D. Seidov (USA), A.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Root Zone Salinity Modeling Within Kalaat El Andalous Irrigated District (Tunisia) Using Saltmod Model
    Root zone salinity modeling within Kalaat El Andalous irrigated district (Tunisia) using SaltMod model Ahmed Saidi 1*, Moncef Hammami 2, Hedi Daghari 3, Hedi Ben Ali4, Amor Boughdiri 5 1,3 Carthage University, National Agronomic Institute of Tunis, 43 Charles Nicolle Street, Mahrajene City, 1082 Tunis, Tunisia 2,5 Carthage University, Higher Agronomic School of Mateur, Road of Tabarka, 7030 Mateur, Tunisia 4Agency of agricultural investment promotion, 6000 Gabes, Tunisia Abstract—SaltMod simulations indicate a slight change of root zone salinity remaining between 3 and 6 dS/m and do not causes risks to forage and cereal crops. However, such salinity is causing a yield decrease of 10 to 20% for tomato crop. During the next 10 years, groundwater water table depth will range between 1.33 and 1.76 m. and remains lower than that of the root zone (0.6 m). Therefore, groundwater table will not pose problems as long as we keep the same management conditions during this period. Moreover, the simulation of drainage system depth variation impacts on root zone salinity indicates that a decrease of drainage lines depth does not affect root zone salinity which remains constant (4.94 dS/m and 3.68 dS/m respectively during the first season and the second season). Regarding groundwater table depth, it is noted that there is a variation for each drainage lines depth variation and groundwater level is ranging from 1.26 to 0.26 m and 1.76 to 0.76 m during the first season and the second season respectively. Thus, optimum drainage lines depth corresponds to that for which salinity and groundwater level have acceptable values not threatening crops and generating minimum drainage flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling Surface Water-Groundwater Exchange
    Modelling Surface Water-Groundwater Exchange Evaluating Model Uncertainty from the Catchment to Bedform-Scale Dissertation der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) vorgelegt von Reynold Chow, M.Sc., P.Geo aus Toronto, Kanada Tübingen 2019 Gedruckt mit Genehmigung der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen. Tag der mündlichen Qualifikation: 21.05.2019 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Rosenstiel 1. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Wolfgang Nowak 2. Berichterstatter: Dr. rer. nat. Thomas Wöhling 3. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Olaf A. Cirpka Abstract My dissertation focuses on evaluating model uncertainties when numerically simulating surface water-groundwater (sw-gw) interactions at different scales. To do so, I mainly use HydroGeoSphere, a physically-based distributed finite element model that fully couples variably saturated subsurface flow with surface water flow. I evaluate three predominant model uncertainty types at three different scales of sw-gw interaction. For each of these investigations, I selected a corresponding study site. Firstly, I evaluate structural (conceptual) uncertainty from delineating baseflow contribution areas to gaining stream reaches, or stream capture zones, at the catchment-scale. I investigate how the delineated stream capture zone (in the Alder Creek watershed) can differ due to the chosen model code and delineation method (Chow et al. 2016). The results indicate that different models can calibrate acceptably well to the same data and produce very similar distributions of hydraulic head, but can produce different capture zones. The stream capture zone is highly sensitive to the post-processing particle tracking algorithm. Reverse transport is an alternative and more reliable approach that accounts for local-scale parameter uncertainty and provides probability intervals for the stream capture zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 7 (2016) 38–54
    Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 7 (2016) 38–54 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ejrh Examining runoff generation processes in the Selke catchment in central Germany: Insights from data and semi-distributed numerical model a,b,∗ b b Sumit Sinha , Michael Rode , Dietrich Borchardt a Geography Department, Durham University, Science Site, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK b Department of Aquatic Ecosystem Analysis, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Bruckstrasse 3a, 39114 Magdeburg, Germany a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Study region: Our study is focussed on a mesoscale catchment, Selke, in central Germany Received 9 March 2016 2 having an area of 463 km with spatially diverse land-use from upland to the low-lying Received in revised form 2 June 2016 areas in the vicinity of the catchment outlet. Accepted 11 June 2016 Study focus: This study used rainfall-runoff data available on daily time step to examine Available online 7 July 2016 the spatio-temporal variation of runoff coefficients. We then applied a validated semi- distributed hydrological model, HYPE, for examining the spatio-temporal variation of runoff Keywords: generating mechanisms. HYPE model was modified in a minor fashion and simulations Horton runoff were conducted again to find out the portion of discharge originating from different runoff Dunne runoff generation mechanisms. Runoff generation New hydrological insights for the region: We examined the spatio-temporal variation of runoff Semi-distributed model HYPE model generating mechanisms on the sub-basin level on seasonal basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3. Hydrology
    3 Hydrology Robert R. Ziemer and Thomas E. Lisle Overview transient snow packs during rain on snow events. l Streamflow is highly variable in mountainous l Removal of trees, which consume water, areas of the Pacific coastal ecoregion. The tends to increase soil moisture and base stream- timing and variability of streamflow is strongly flow in summer when rates of evapotranspira- influenced by form of precipitation (e.g., rain- tion are high. These summertime effects tend to fall, snowmelt, or rain on snow). disappear within several years. Effects of tree l High variability in runoff processes limits removal on soil moisture in winter are minimal the ability to detect and predict human-caused because of high seasonal rainfall and reduced changes in streamflow. Changes in flow are usu- rates of evapotranspiration. ally associated with changes in other watershed l The rate of recovery from land use processes that may be of equal concern. Studies depends on the type of land use and on the of how land use affects watershed responses are hydrologic processes that are affected. thus likely to be most useful if they focus on how runoff processes are affected at the site of disturbance and how these effects, hydrologic Introduction or otherwise, are propagated downstream. l Land use and other site factors affecting Streamflow is an essential variable in under- flows have less effect on major floods and in standing the functioning of watersheds and large basins than on smaller peak flows and in associated ecosystems because it supplies the small basins. Land use is more likely to affect primary medium and source of energy for the streamflow during rain on snow events, which movement of water, sediment, organic mate- usuallv produce larger floods in much of the rial, nutrients, and thermal energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water and Groundwater Interactions in Traditionally Irrigated Fields in Northern New Mexico, U.S.A
    water Article Surface Water and Groundwater Interactions in Traditionally Irrigated Fields in Northern New Mexico, U.S.A. Karina Y. Gutiérrez-Jurado 1, Alexander G. Fernald 2, Steven J. Guldan 3 and Carlos G. Ochoa 4,* 1 School of the Environment, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia; karina.gutierrez@flinders.edu.au 2 Water Resources Research Institute, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA; [email protected] 3 Sustainable Agriculture Science Center, New Mexico State University, Alcalde, NM 87511, USA; [email protected] 4 Department of Animal and Rangeland Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-541-737-0933 Academic Editor: Ashok K. Chapagain Received: 18 December 2016; Accepted: 3 February 2017; Published: 10 February 2017 Abstract: Better understanding of surface water (SW) and groundwater (GW) interactions and water balances has become indispensable for water management decisions. This study sought to characterize SW-GW interactions in three crop fields located in three different irrigated valleys in northern New Mexico by (1) estimating deep percolation (DP) below the root zone in flood-irrigated crop fields; and (2) characterizing shallow aquifer response to inputs from DP associated with irrigation. Detailed measurements of irrigation water application, soil water content fluctuations, crop field runoff, and weather data were used in the water budget calculations for each field. Shallow wells were used to monitor groundwater level response to DP inputs. The amount of DP was positively and significantly related to the total amount of irrigation water applied for the Rio Hondo and Alcalde sites, but not for the El Rito site.
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporating Student-Centered Approaches Into Catchment Hydrology Teaching: a Review and Synthesis
    Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3263–3278, 2012 www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/16/3263/2012/ Hydrology and doi:10.5194/hess-16-3263-2012 Earth System © Author(s) 2012. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Sciences Incorporating student-centered approaches into catchment hydrology teaching: a review and synthesis S. E. Thompson1, I. Ngambeki2,5, P. A. Troch3, M. Sivapalan4, and D. Evangelou2 1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA 2School of Engineering Education, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA 3Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA 4Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA 5Global Policy Research Institute and Department of Technology, Leadership, and Innovation, College of Technology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA Correspondence to: S. E. Thompson ([email protected]) Received: 15 December 2011 – Published in Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.: 13 January 2012 Revised: 20 August 2012 – Accepted: 22 August 2012 – Published: 13 September 2012 Abstract. As hydrologists confront the future of water 1 Introduction resources on a globalized, resource-scarce and human- impacted planet, the educational preparation of future gen- erations of water scientists becomes increasingly important. There is an increasing need to understand the dynamics of Although hydrology inherits a tradition of teacher-centered water resources as key determinants of development, hu- direct instruction – based on lecture, reading and assign- man and environmental health, and conflict and sustainabil- ment formats – a growing body of knowledge derived from ity (Gleick and Palaniappan, 2010; Postel and Wolf, 2001; engineering education research suggests that modifications United Nations Development Program, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Groundwater Flow for Near Surface Disposal Facilities Iaea, Vienna, 2001 Iaea-Tecdoc-1199 Issn 1011–4289
    IAEA-TECDOC-1199 Characterization of groundwater flow for near surface disposal facilities February 2001 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Waste Technology Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria CHARACTERIZATION OF GROUNDWATER FLOW FOR NEAR SURFACE DISPOSAL FACILITIES IAEA, VIENNA, 2001 IAEA-TECDOC-1199 ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2001 Printed by the IAEA in Austria February 2001 FOREWORD The objective of adioactive waste disposal is to provide long term isolation of waste to protect humans and the environment while not imposing any undue burden on future generations. To meet this objective, establishment of a disposal system takes into account the characteristics of the waste and site concerned. In practice, low and intermediate level radioactive waste (LILW) with limited amounts of long lived radionuclides is disposed of at near surface disposal facilities for which disposal units are constructed above or below the ground surface up to several tens of meters in depth. Extensive experience in near surface disposal has been gained in Member States where a large number of such facilities have been constructed. The experience needs to be shared effectively by Member States which have limited resources for developing and/or operating near surface repositories. A set of technical reports is being prepared by the IAEA to provide Member States, especially developing countries, with technical guidance and current information on how to achieve the objective of near surface disposal through siting, design, operation, closure and post-closure controls. These publications are intended to address specific technical issues, which are important for the aforementioned disposal activities, such as waste package inspection and verification, monitoring, and long-term maintenance of records.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Drainage Processes, by Elizabeth Keppeler, and David Brown
    Subsurface Drainage Processes and Management Impacts1 Elizabeth Keppeler2 and David Brown3 Abstract: Storm-induced streamflow in forested upland watersheds is linked to he hydrologic response of forested watersheds to rain events rainfall by transient, variably saturated flow through several different flow Toccurs through several interrelated flow processes. Soil surface paths. In the absence of exposed bedrock, shallow flow-restrictive layers, or conditions determine whether rainfall will run off as surface flow or compacted soil surfaces, virtually all of the infiltrated rainfall reaches the stream whether it will infiltrate and travel through the subsurface. as subsurface flow. Subsurface runoff can occur within micropores (voids between Infiltration capacities for soils in the coastal redwood region exceed soil grains), various types of macropores (structural voids between aggregates, plant and animal-induced biopores), and through fractures in weathered and maximum rainfall intensities common in the region. Exceptions consolidated bedrock. In addition to generating flow through the subsurface, occur in isolated areas where bedrock is exposed at the land surface. transient rain events can also cause large increases in fluid pressures within a More widespread are infiltration limitations resulting from soil hillslope. If pore pressures exceed stability limits of soils and shallow geologic compaction associated with road building, landings, and other materials, landslides and debris flows may result. Subsurface monitoring of constructed surfaces. Over the great majority of forested landscapes, pipeflows and pore pressures in unchanneled swales at North Fork Caspar Creek rainfall infiltrates into the soil and flows through the subsurface to in the Jackson Demonstration State Forest began in 1985. Four sites have been streams, rivers, and lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrological Controls on Salinity Exposure and the Effects on Plants in Lowland Polders
    Hydrological controls on salinity exposure and the effects on plants in lowland polders Sija F. Stofberg Thesis committee Promotors Prof. Dr S.E.A.T.M. van der Zee Personal chair Ecohydrology Wageningen University & Research Prof. Dr J.P.M. Witte Extraordinary Professor, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Department of Ecological Science VU Amsterdam and Principal Scientist at KWR Nieuwegein Other members Prof. Dr A.H. Weerts, Wageningen University & Research Dr G. van Wirdum Dr K.T. Rebel, Utrecht University Dr R.P. Bartholomeus, KWR Water, Nieuwegein This research was conducted under the auspices of the Research School for Socio- Economic and Natural Sciences of the Environment (SENSE) Hydrological controls on salinity exposure and the effects on plants in lowland polders Sija F. Stofberg Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. Dr A.P.J. Mol in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Wednesday 07 June 2017 at 4 p.m. in the Aula. Sija F. Stofberg Hydrological controls on salinity exposure and the effects on plants in lowland polders, 172 pages. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands (2017) With references, with summary in English ISBN: 978-94-6343-187-3 DOI: 10.18174/413397 Table of contents Chapter 1 General introduction .......................................................................................... 7 Chapter 2 Fresh water lens persistence and root zone salinization hazard under temperate climate ............................................................................................ 17 Chapter 3 Effects of root mat buoyancy and heterogeneity on floating fen hydrology ..
    [Show full text]
  • 1.72, Groundwater Hydrology Prof. Charles Harvey Lecture Packet #1: Course Introduction, Water Balance Equation
    1.72, Groundwater Hydrology Prof. Charles Harvey Lecture Packet #1: Course Introduction, Water Balance Equation Where does water come from? It cycles. The total supply doesn’t change much. 39 Moisture over 100 land Precipitation on land 385 Precipitation on ocean 61 424 Evaporation Evaporation from from the land the ocean Surface runoff Infiltration Evapotranspiration and evaporation Groundwater 38 surface recharge discharge Groundwater flow 1 Groundwater discharge Low permeability strata Hydrologic cycle with yearly flow volumes based on annual surface precipitation on earth, ~119,000 km3/year. 3000 BC – Ecclesiastes 1:7 (Solomon) “All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full; unto the place from whence the rivers come, thither they return again.” Greek Philosophers (Plato, Aristotle) embraced the concept, but mechanisms were not understood. 17th Century – Pierre Perrault showed that rainfall was sufficient to explain flow of the Seine. 1.72, Groundwater Hydrology Lecture Packet 1 Prof. Charles Harvey Page 1 of 15 The earth’s energy (radiation) cycle Solar (shortwave) radiation Terrestrial (long-wave) radiation Reflected Outgoing Space Incoming 99.998 6 18 6 4 39 27 Backscattering by air Net radiant emission by greenhouse Reflection gases by clouds Net radiant Atmosphere emission by 11 Net clouds 4 absorption by Absorption greenhouse by clouds gasses & 20 clouds Absorption by Reflection atmosphere Net radiant Net by surface Net latent emission by sensible heat flux surface heat flux 46 15 7 24 Ocean and Absorption by Land surface Heating of surface 46 0.002 Circulation redistributes energy /yr) 2 20 0 cal cm 1 -20 -60 4.0 3.0 Total Flux Net radiation flux (10 flux Net radiation 2.0 Latent 1.0 Heat cal/yr) 22 0 Ocean -1.0 Currents Sensible Heat -2.0 Energy Transfer (10 Energy Transfer -3.0 -4.0 900 N 600 300 00 300 600 900 S Latitude 1.72, Groundwater Hydrology Lecture Packet 1 Prof.
    [Show full text]