National Biodiversity Strategy A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Appendix-C15
Appendix-C15 Photo collection (1) Power plant sites and surrounding areas Project Site (Rainy Season) Project Site (Dry Season) Sea Side of the Project Site - 1 - Port near the Project Site Roads near the Project Site Local Transportation near the Project Site - 2 - Villages near the Project Site Stores near the Project Site Construction Sites of Steel Towers for Transmission Line (Source: JICA Study Team) - 3 - (2) Photos of Fish Species: (Source: http://en.bdfish.org/2011/06/ pangas-catfish-pangasius-pangasius-hamilton-1822 /pangasius_pangasius/) Hilsha (Tenualosa ilisha) Yellowtail catfish (Pangasius pangasius) Bombay duck (Harpadon nehereus) Silver pomfret (Pampus argenteus) Poa Fish (Otolithoides pama) Black Tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodin) - 4 - White prawn (Penaeus merguiensis) (Source: http://www.fisheries.gov.bd/album_details/505) Mackerel (Scombridae) Jait Bata (Mugilidae) Alua (Coilia sp.) Datina (Sparidae) - 5 - Phasya (Engraulidae) Kucha chingri (Acetes sp.) (Source: JICA Study Team) (3) Birds Pied Starling House sparrow Drongo Wagtail - 6 - Great Egret Little Egret Common Redshank Marsh Sandpiper Black-capped Kingfisher Pied Kingfisher - 7 - Red-necked Stint Common Sandpiper Whimbrel Wood Sandpiper Little Cormorant White-winged Tern (Source: JICA Study Team) - 8 - (4) Threatened Species Spoon-billed Sandpiper (Eurynorhynchus pygmeus) Olive Ridley Turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea) (Source: JICA Study Team) - 9 - Appendix-C15.1-1 Current Condition of Candidate Route Candidate 1 EKATA BAZAR EIDMONI INTERSECTION POWER PLANT JANATA -
A Global Perspective on Sustainable Agriculture
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272307886 Productive Landscapes: a Global Perspective on Sustainable Agriculture Article in Landscapes · June 2014 DOI: 10.1179/1466203514Z.00000000024 CITATIONS READS 7 296 1 author: Erika Guttmann-Bond 34 PUBLICATIONS 321 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Rediscovering Sustainability: How archaeology can save the planet View project Identification of intensive early agriculture (plaggen soils) using PIXE analysis View project All content following this page was uploaded by Erika Guttmann-Bond on 01 September 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. landscapes, Vol. 15 No. 1, June, 2014, 59–76 Productive Landscapes: a Global Perspective on Sustainable Agriculture Erika Guttmann-Bond University of Wales, Trinity Saint David The connections between agriculture and landscape are well established in western perceptions. Agricultural landscapes in the Western world have, however, become increasingly industrialised and low in biodiversity, and the standard practice in developed countries is to grow large fields of single crops sprayed with pesticides and herbicides. Many leading agronomists believe that such industrial methods are the only way we will succeed in feeding a growing global population. However, many opposing agronomists argue that agroecology is a more productive and efficient use of land. This paper is a review of archaeological, environmental and ethnographic evidence for sustainable agricultural land management, as it has been practiced in the past, and as it is practiced today in countries that use traditional, pre-industrial methods. A range of evidence demonstrates that small, biodiverse farms are more productive per hectare than agribusinesses that practice monocropping. -
A Training Guide for in Situ Conservation On-Farm
A Training Guide for In Situ Conservation On-farm Version 1 D.I Jarvis, L. Myer, H. Klemick, L. Guarino, M. Smale, A.H.D. Brown, M. Sadiki, B. Sthapit and T. Hodgkin SWISS AGENCY FOR DEVELOPMENT AND COOPERATION SDC IDRC Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs Development Cooperation Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH Bundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit, Germany IPGRI is a Centre A Training Guide for In Situ Conservation On-farm Version 1 D.I Jarvis, L. Myer, H. Klemick, L. Guarino, M. Smale, A.H.D. Brown, M. Sadiki, B. Sthapit and T. Hodgkin With the collaboration of : S. Achtar P. Eyzaguirre T. Quinones-Vega A. Amri D. Fanissi K. R’hrib L. Arias-Reyes M. Fernandez R. Rana Z. Asfaw E. Friis-Hansen V. Ramanatha Rao G. Ayad D. Gauchan D. Rijal J. Bajracharya N.P. Ha K. Riley R. Balaghi N.N. Hue J. Rodriguez D. Balma M. Ibnou-Ali R. Salazar B. Baniya K. Joshi E. Sauri-Duch M.O. Belem O. Kabore M. Sawasogo A. Birouk S. Khatiwada R. Sevilla-Panizo A. Bouizgaren A. King K.K. Sherchand P. Bramel-Cox D. Lope-Alzina A. Subedi S. Brush M. Mahdi M. Taghouti L. Burgos-May I. Mar A. Tan J. Canul-Ku F. Marquez-Sanchez A. Teshome F. Castillo-Gonzalez P.N. Mathur I. Thorman S. Ceccarelli H. Mellas H.Q. Tin P. Chaudhary N.K. Motiramani P. Tiwari J.-L. Chavez-Servia C. Morales-Valderrama L.N. Trinh V. Cob-Vicab A. Mudwari R. Tripp P.H. Cuong F. Nassif M. Upadhyay N.N. -
Red List of Bangladesh 2015
Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary Chief National Technical Expert Mohammad Ali Reza Khan Technical Coordinator Mohammad Shahad Mahabub Chowdhury IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature Bangladesh Country Office 2015 i The designation of geographical entitles in this book and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature concerning the legal status of any country, territory, administration, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The biodiversity database and views expressed in this publication are not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, Bangladesh Forest Department and The World Bank. This publication has been made possible because of the funding received from The World Bank through Bangladesh Forest Department to implement the subproject entitled ‘Updating Species Red List of Bangladesh’ under the ‘Strengthening Regional Cooperation for Wildlife Protection (SRCWP)’ Project. Published by: IUCN Bangladesh Country Office Copyright: © 2015 Bangladesh Forest Department and IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holders, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holders. Citation: Of this volume IUCN Bangladesh. 2015. Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. xvi+122. ISBN: 978-984-34-0733-7 Publication Assistant: Sheikh Asaduzzaman Design and Printed by: Progressive Printers Pvt. -
Sustainable Management of the Sundarbans
SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF THE SUNDARBANS: STAKEHOLDER ATTITUDES TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE MANGROVE POLICY AND MANAGEMENT by © Trishita Mondal A Thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Environmental Policy Environmental Policy Institute Grenfell Campus, Memorial University of Newfoundland November, 2019 Corner Brook Newfoundland and Labrador i Abstract The world’s largest contiguous mangrove forest, the Sundarbans, is not only rich in biodiversity but also provides ecological, economic and cultural services to people surrounding the forest. The Sundarbans is one of the oldest systematically managed mangroves in the world, providing numerous benefits and services to local communities and the environment. The natural resources of the forest remain under threat from population pressure, over exploitation, natural disasters and lack of practical policy regimes. This study attempts to assess attitudes of stakeholders towards sustainable management and conservation of mangrove forests as a means to assist planners, policy- makers, and decision-makers. Improving attitudes of local stakeholders towards conservation of natural resources is one of the strategies for sustainable forest management. A mixed method approach was conducted to fulfill the objectives of this study. The study reveals that the people of Sundarbans Impact Zone (SIZ) are closely associated with the Sundarbans and are highly dependent on it for their livelihood. Collecting resources from both aquatic and terrestrial areas within the Sundarbans has been considered a traditional right for people within the SIZ. As such, people are increasingly becoming more conscious about government policy and associated laws and regulations. Most of the villagers participate in government and NGO’s sponsored programs and they want the forest to be managed in a sustainable way. -
The Rise and Predictable Fall of Globalized Industrial Agriculture.Pdf
The Rise and Predictable Fall of Globalized Industrial Agriculture a report from the international forum on globalization by Debbie Barker The International Forum on Globalization (IFG) is a research and educational institution comprised of leading scholars, economists, researchers, and activists from around the globe. © 2007 International Forum on Globalization (IFG) 1009 General Kennedy Avenue, No. 2 San Francisco, CA 94129 Phone: 415-561-7650 Email: [email protected] Website: www. ifg.org ❖ ❖ ❖ Author: Debbie Barker Editing: Sarah Anderson, Jerry Mander Research: Katie L. Brown, Suzanne York Production: Haeyoung Kim, Shannon Connelly Publication Designer: Daniela Sklan – 2 – The Rise and Predictable Fall of Globalized Industrial Agriculture Contents Introduction: W HO O WNS F OOD? 1 A New Urgency for Change 3 Part One: C OMMODIFICATION OF S URVIVAL 5 Touching the Soil 5 Radical Shift to Corporate Control 6 Box One: Who Owns the Food: Farm and Food Corporate Concentration 7 Global Macro Effects 9 The Roots of Migration 10 Climate Change /Peak Oil: Fatal Threats to Globalized Agriculture 10 Part Two: WTO AND THE A RCHITECTURE OF C ONTROL 12 I. The Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) 13 Subsidizing the Powerful 14 Dumping on the Poor 16 Box Two: U.S. Cotton Subsidies Harm African Countries 17 The Mirage of Market Access 18 Developing Country Indicators 19 Undermining Farmer Protections 19 Supply Management Boards and Price Supports 19 International Commodity Agreements (ICAs) 20 II. Agreement on Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) 22 Box Three: Who Owns Traditional Knowledge? Debate in the 23 Convention on Biological Diversity (CDS) III. The Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards (SPS) 25 IV. -
2004 World Food Prize International Symposium
THE WORLD FOOD PRIZE 2009 Norman E. Borlaug International Symposium Food, Agriculture, and National Security in a Globalized World October 14-16, 2009 - Des Moines, Iowa Conversation: Agriculture and Climate Change – Part of the Solution October 16, 2009 – 2:00-4:00 p.m. Hans Herren – Co-chair, International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development; 1995 World Food Prize Laureate Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, friends. It’s very nice again to be here together this afternoon with however few you are, but I am sure these are the hard-core, interested people, to look at the issue of climate change and agriculture. And as we heard a few times that agriculture is the problem, or part of the problem, to climate change, maybe we’ll also see how agriculture can be part of the solution. To do this, we will literally go down to earth, because that’s where agriculture has to contribute to the adaptation but also mitigation to climate change. We have a formidable panel this afternoon, and we’ll try to focus on solutions, but only after we state again the problem – because I think we have to understand the problem well in order to also look at the solutions and make sure there is a proper fit between what are the problems and what kind of solutions can we talk about. Really the idea is that we do understand the bottleneck which we have, in terms of agriculture being now part of the problem of climate change, and how we can turn it around, make it the part of the solution. -
Forest Health in Bangladesh
11/28/2011 FOREST HEALTH IN BANGLADESH M. Al-Al-AminAmin PhD Professor Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences Chittagong University, Chittagong Bangladesh 26038´ Legend 260 100 km INDIA 250 Sylhet Ta n gail I I 240 N Dhaka N D D BANGLADESH I I Comilla A A 0 Barisal Feni 23 Noakh ali Chittagong Khulna Patuakhali 0 Sundarban 22 Cox’s Bazar BAY OF BENGAL Myan 0 mar 21 20034´ 88001´ 890 900 910 920 Map 1. Forest cover in Bangladesh (Al-Amin, 2011) Basic Facts of Bangladesh Total family : 17,600,804 Total farm holding : 15,089,000 Total area : 14.845million hectare Forest : 2.599 million hectare Cultivable land : 8.44 million hectare Cultivable waste : 0.268 million hectare Current fellow : 0.469 million hectare Cropping intensity : 175.97% Single cropped area : 2.851 million hectare Double cropped area : 3.984 million hectare Triple cropped area : 0.974 million hectare Net cropped area : 7.809 million hectare Total cropped area : 13.742 million hectare Contribution of agriculture sector to GDP : 23.50% Contribution of crop sector to GDP : 13.44% (Source: BBS, 2006). 1 11/28/2011 More than 95% of the area of Bangladesh is owned by individuals (81%) or by the state (14%). Indigenous ownership constitutes 2.5%. In “Cultivated land” and “Villages” almost 100% of the area is individually owned. In “Forest” and “Inland water” about 50% of the area is state-owned. Approximately 20% of the “Forest” area is owned by indigenous groups. (FD, 2009) Land uses of Bangladesh Land Use Category Area (M Ha) Percent Agriculture 9.57 64.9 State Forest -
Agreement on Agriculture and Food Sovereignty Perspectives from Mesoamerica and Asia
NO.3 ⏐ AUG 2003 ⏐ ENGLISH VERSION Agreement on Agriculture and Food Sovereignty Perspectives from Mesoamerica and Asia Edited by Arze Glipo Content: 1 Introduction 2 The Road to Cancun: Impact of the AoA 16 The Stakes at Cancun 28 Towards an Alternative Framework 32 Bibliography Global Issue Papers, No. 3: Agreement on Agriculture and Food Sovereignty Perspectives from Mesoamerica and Asia Published by the Heinrich Böll Foundation © Heinrich Böll Foundation 2003 All rights reserved The following paper does not necessarily represent the views of the Heinrich Böll Foundation. Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, Hackesche Höfe, Rosenthaler Str. 40/41, D-10178 Berlin Tel: ++49/30/285340; fax: ++49/30/28534109 [email protected] www.boell.de Introduction Steeped in the rhetoric of free trade that promised expanded agricultural trade and growth for developing countries, the Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) took effect in 1995 under the new World Trade Organization. As the AoA aims to liberalize trade in agriculture, it has tremendous impact on agriculture and the livelihoods of poor peas- ants in the South. In many developing countries, agriculture is the major source of rural livelihoods and provides employment for over half of the labour force. Despite a declining share of GDP, agriculture remains a major pillar of these economies. In the past decades, many such countries have struggled to raise their agricultural production to meet the in- creasing food needs of their populations. But the neo-liberal economic reforms im- posed by the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank on developing coun- tries, particularly since the Structural Adjustment Programmes (SAPs) of the 80s, have reoriented domestic agriculture away from food production and increasingly in- tegrated it into the world market. -
To the Conservation and Use of Plant Genetic Resources
1BSUJDJQBUPSZBQQSPBDIFT UPUIFDPOTFSWBUJPOBOEVTF PGQMBOUHFOFUJDSFTPVSDFT &TCFSO'SJJT)BOTFOBOE#IVXPO4UIBQJU FEJUPST 1BSUJDJQBUPSZBQQSPBDIFT UPUIFDPOTFSWBUJPOBOEVTF PGQMBOUHFOFUJDSFTPVSDFT &TCFSO'SJJT)BOTFOBOE#IVXPO4UIBQJU FEJUPST 2 Participatory approaches to conservation and use of plant genetic resources The International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI) is an autonomous international sci- entific organization, supported by the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). IPGRI’s mandate is to advance the conservation and use of genetic diversity for the well-being of present and future generations. IPGRI’s headquarters is based in Rome, Italy, with offices in another 19 countries worldwide. It operates through three programmes: (1) the Plant Genetic Resources Programme, (2) the CGIAR Genetic Resources Support Programme, and (3) the International Network for the Improvement of Banana and Plantain (INIBAP). The international status of IPGRI is conferred under an Establishment Agreement which, by January 2000, had been signed and ratified by the Governments of Algeria, Australia, Belgium, Benin, Bolivia, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chile, China, Congo, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, Greece, Guinea, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iran, Israel, Italy, Jordan, Kenya, Malaysia, Mauritania, Morocco, Norway, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Senegal, Slovakia, Sudan, Switzerland, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda and Ukraine. Financial support for -
Fairness in a Fragile World: a Memo on Sustainable Development
Fairness in a Fragile World: A Memo on Sustainable Development The Heinrich Boll Foundation sponsored this study by Wolfgang Sachs, Henri Acselrad, Farida Akhter, Ada Amon, Tewolde Berhan Gebre Egziabher, Hillary French, Pekka Haavisto, Paul Hawken, Hazel Henderson, Ashok Khosla, Sara Larrain, Reinhard Loske, Anita Roddick, Viviene Taylor, Christine von Weizsacker, Svlatoslav Zabelin, and Heman Agrawal. NPQ, Summer, 2002 Livelihood Rights vs. Export-led Growth It is the challenge of Johannesburg to move beyond Rio, yet it is the danger of Johannesburg to regress behind Rio. The Rio Conference on Environment and Development strove to address two major crises: the crisis of nature and that of justice. Environmentalists-often from the North-were expected to take into account the desire of the majority of the world's citizens for a life beyond poverty and distress. By contrast, developmentalists-often from the South-were called upon to recognize the disastrous repercussions of a deteriorated nature base. Typically, environmentalists were seen to be opposing deforestation, chemical agriculture or expansion of power plants, while developmentalists were pushing for marketing timber, expanding food supplies or electrifying villages. Therefore, the Earth Summit aimed at integrating the environment and development agendas to liberate policy makers from the dilemma of either aggravating the crisis of nature by pushing for development or aggravating the crisis of justice by insisting on the protection of nature. As it turned out, the Rio process fell short of fulfilling this ambition. How to respond to the desire for justice without upsetting the biosphere is still a puzzle for the 21st century. Of course, the fact that helping people and helping nature can go hand in hand has been demonstrated in many instances: in organic agriculture, in sustainable forestry and in resource-efficient industries as well. -
Biodiversity: Flora
BANGLADESH NATIONAL CONSERVATION STARTEGY BIODIVERSITY: FLORA MOHAMMAD KAMAL HOSSAIN 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 GENERAL Biological diversity – or Biodiversity is the term given to the variety of life on Earth and the natural patterns it forms (CBD 2000). It encompasses the variety of life, at all levels of organization, classified both by evolutionary (phylogenetic) and ecological (functional) criteria. Biodiversity is the result of billions of years of evolution, shaped by natural processes and increasingly by the influence of humans. The diversity includes the wide variety of plants, animals and microorganisms. Scientists estimate that there are actually about 13 million species, though estimates range from 3 to 100 million (CBD 2000). However, biodiversity is not just the number of species in a particular area. It is the total variety of genetic strains, species and ecosystems that are found in nature. In principle, biodiversity is sub-divided into three major hierarchical categories, e.g. variation at the genetic level within a particular species; species diversity or the number and proportion of different species in a particular area; and ecosystem diversity that describes the variation in the assemblages of species and their habitats (ITTO 1993). Species diversity is a measure of the number of species of all or various taxa per unit area. Species come in all shapes and sizes, from the tiny organisms that we can see only through a microscope to large Boilam trees in natural forests or whales found in the oceans. An individual of a species can reproduce successfully, creating viable offspring only with another member of the same species.