DOCSLIB.ORG

Writing in Brotherhood: Reconstituting Indigenous Citizenship

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Writing in Brotherhood: Reconstituting Indigenous Citizenship WRITING IN BROTHERHOOD: RECONSTITUTING INDIGENOUS CITIZENSHIP, NATIONHOOD, AND RELATIONSHIPS AT THE TURN OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY by Michael P. Taylor B.A., Brigham Young University, 2010 M.A., Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, 2012 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (English) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) July 2016 © Michael P. Taylor, 2016 Abstract The current field of Indigenous literary studies remains overwhelmingly focused on individual authors and their use of traditionally Eurowestern literary genres. While analyzing these individuals’ novels, poetry, essays, and other traditionally single-author literary genres, however, scholars often overlook these same individuals’ participation in the collectivist national and co- national writings of their contemporaneous Indigenous nations and networks. This dissertation argues for the need to (re)center collectivist texts within Indigenous literary studies and highlights the fluid Indigenous literary networks of North America and the Pacific at the turn of the twentieth century. By juxtaposing the constitutions, petitions, and newspapers of the Hui Aloha ‘Āina (Hawaiian Patriotic League), the Alaska Native Brotherhood/Sisterhood, and the National Council of American Indians, I trace the hemispheric and trans-Pacific history of collectivist literary genres in order to provide an innovative Indigenous literary history of genre. I argue that when Indigenous peoples write as a collective body, their writings participate within longstanding Indigenous literary traditions—from the Hodinöhsö:ni’ Great Law (ca. 1090–1500) to the Constitution of the White Earth Nation (2009)—that continue to be overlooked in favor of “orature” and contemporary fiction composed by individual authors. By (re)centering collectivism within the study of Indigenous literatures, this dissertation also introduces the theoretical framework of co- nationalism, the process and potential of Indigenous nations working together while maintaining local distinctions and commitments, in order to attest to the ongoing survival of Indigenous literary communities and coalitions, maintain Indigenous lands as central to Indigenous literatures, and disrupt the definitions of literature that continue to marginalize literary expressions of Indigenous solidarity. ii Preface This is an original work of research by the author, Michael P. Taylor. iii Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... ii Preface ........................................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... vii Introduction: (Re)connecting Indigenous Peoples, Literatures, and Lands ............................1 Ethics, Methodology, and Structure............................................................................................ 9 Collectivism: A “Road Forward” for Indigenous Literary Studies .......................................... 14 Indigenous Solidarity in Motion ............................................................................................... 21 Co-nationalism: “The Indians Must Organize” ........................................................................ 26 Chapter 1: Constitutional Stories ...............................................................................................33 Constitution of the White Earth Nation (2009) ......................................................................... 38 Ka Hui Aloha ‘Āina. Ke Kumukānāwai1 (1893) ...................................................................... 49 Grand Camp Constitution of the Alaska Native Brotherhood (1917) ...................................... 73 Constitution and By-Laws of the National Council of American Indians (1926) ................... 90 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 107 Chapter 2: Signatures of Solidarity .........................................................................................109 Petition of the National Council of American Indians (1926) ................................................ 115 1929 Grand Camp Resolution (Alaska Native Brotherhood/Sisterhood) ............................... 132 1 Constitution of the Hawaiian Patriotic League iv Palapala Hoopii Kue Hoohuiaina2 (1897, Hui Aloha ‘Āina) .................................................. 143 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 148 Chapter 3: Indigenous Paper Routes .......................................................................................150 Ke Aloha ‘Āina (1895–1920) .................................................................................................. 156 The Alaska Fisherman (1923–32) ........................................................................................... 166 Indian News Letter (1929–38) ................................................................................................ 182 Conclusion: Moving Together along the Road Forward ........................................................201 Works Cited ................................................................................................................................211 2 Petition Against Annexation v List of Figures Figure 1: Alaska Native Brotherhood. 1944 the Alaska Native Brotherhood Annual Convention Meeting Minutes. MS/007. Walter A. Soboleff Papers, 1920–2009. Sealaska Heritage Institute Archives. Juneau, AK. ........................................................................................ 25 Figure 2: Hui Aloha ‘Āina. Ke Kumukanawai. March 22, 1893. Ka Leo o ka Lahui [Honolulu, HI]. Ulukau: Hawaiian Electronic Library ....................................................................... 67 Figure 3: Alaska Native Brotherhood. Grand Camp Constitution. 1917–18. Philip Drucker's The Native Brotherhoods: Modern Intertribal Organizations on the Northwest Coast (1958) ................................................................................................................................ 79 Figure 4: Jean Wanamaker. Certificate of Examination of an Alaska Indian as to Qualifications as to Claims of Citizenship. February 6, 1919. Sealaska Heritage Institute. MS/047. William S. Wanamaker Collection. Sealaska Heritage Institute ...................................... 85 Figure 5: Constitution and By-Laws of the National Council of American Indians. 1926. Amherst College Digital Collections ................................................................................ 93 Figure 6: The National Council of American Indians. Campground Letterhead. 1926–38. MSS 1704. Gertrude Bonnin and Raymond Bonnin Collection. L. Tom Perry Special Collections. Brigham Young University......................................................................... 102 Figure 7: Ke Aloha Aina. 5 Jun. 1897. Ho‘olaupa‘i: Hawaiian Nūpepa Collection. ulukau: Hawaiian Electronic Library ........................................................................................... 161 Figure 8: Newspaper Boys. “Ka Makana Hape Nuia A Ke Aloha Aina.” Ke Aloha Aina. 6 Jan. 1906................................................................................................................................. 164 Figure 9: Alaska Fisherman. February 15, 1923. KETC 10/1-10/3. Alaska State Library. Juneau, Alaska ............................................................................................................................. 168 Figure 10: Alaska Fisherman. Jan. 1924. KETC 10/1-10/3. Alaska State Library. Juneau, AK ......................................................................................................................................... 170 Figure 11: Letter to Captain Bonnin. 15 Apr. 1932. MSS 1704. Gertrude Bonnin and Raymond Bonnin Collection. L. Tom Perry Special Collections. Brigham Young University ....... 185 Figure 12: Indian News. 15 Apr. 1929. MSS 1704. Gertrude Bonnin and Raymond Bonnin Collection. L. Tom Perry Special Collections. Brigham Young University ................... 187 Figure 13: Indian News Letter. 22 Feb. 1932. MSS 1704; Gertrude Bonnin and Raymond Bonnin Collection; L. Tom Perry Special Collections; Brigham Young University ................... 193 vi Acknowledgements Thank you to the Musqueam people upon whose unceded and occupied land the University of British Columbia is located. Thank you to my supervisor, Daniel Heath Justice (Cherokee), for his constant encouragement, insight, and friendship; to Mary Chapman for her lightning-quick responses, thorough feedback, and organizational expertise; and to Dory Nason (Anishinaabe) for her fierce, intellectual passion. This dissertation would not be possible without the generous financial, logistical, and archival support of the Charles
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Analysis of Hawaiʻi‟S Cultural Impact Assessment Process As a Vehicle of Environmental Justice for Kānaka Maoli
    Innovation or Degradation?: An Analysis of Hawaiʻi‟s Cultural Impact Assessment Process as a Vehicle of Environmental Justice for Kānaka Maoli Elena Bryant* INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 231 I. PROVIDING A FRAMEWORK: ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE FOR KĀNAKA MAOLI COMMUNITIES ........................................................ 235 A. Incorporating Environmental Justice into Hawaiʻi‟s EIS Process: Racializing Environmental Justice ........................... 236 B. Defining the “Injustice” ........................................................... 238 C. The Enactment of Natural and Cultural Resource Protections as a Mechanism for Restorative Justice for Kānaka Maoli ..... 244 II. THE CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF WIND AND WATER TO KĀNAKA MAOLI .............................................................. 245 A. Kumulipo: Kānaka Maoli‟s Source of Origin .......................... 246 B. “I paʻa i ke Kalo ʻaʻole ʻoe e puka; If it had ended with the Kalo you would not be here.” ................................................... 247 C. Cultural Significance of the Wind ............................................. 248 D. Cultural Significance of the Sea ............................................... 250 III. THE PUSH TO “GO GREEN”: HAWAIʻI‟S INTERISLAND WIND PROJECT ........................................................................................... 252 A. Hawaiʻi Clean Energy Initiative: Moving Hawaiʻi Towards Energy Self-sufficiency ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICA's ANNEXATION of HAWAII by BECKY L. BRUCE
    A LUSCIOUS FRUIT: AMERICA’S ANNEXATION OF HAWAII by BECKY L. BRUCE HOWARD JONES, COMMITTEE CHAIR JOSEPH A. FRY KARI FREDERICKSON LISA LIDQUIST-DORR STEVEN BUNKER A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2012 Copyright Becky L. Bruce 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT This dissertation argues that the annexation of Hawaii was not the result of an aggressive move by the United States to gain coaling stations or foreign markets, nor was it a means of preempting other foreign nations from acquiring the island or mending a psychic wound in the United States. Rather, the acquisition was the result of a seventy-year relationship brokered by Americans living on the islands and entered into by two nations attempting to find their place in the international system. Foreign policy decisions by both nations led to an increasingly dependent relationship linking Hawaii’s stability to the U.S. economy and the United States’ world power status to its access to Hawaiian ports. Analysis of this seventy-year relationship changed over time as the two nations evolved within the world system. In an attempt to maintain independence, the Hawaiian monarchy had introduced a westernized political and economic system to the islands to gain international recognition as a nation-state. This new system created a highly partisan atmosphere between natives and foreign residents who overthrew the monarchy to preserve their personal status against a rising native political challenge. These men then applied for annexation to the United States, forcing Washington to confront the final obstacle in its rise to first-tier status: its own reluctance to assume the burdens and responsibilities of an imperial policy abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • And Mccardle)
    Merryman and Milligan (and Mccardle) JOHN YOO* It has been said that only Jesus and Shakespeare have been the subject of more works than Abraham Lincoln. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't still keep trying to get things right. I am going to be adding to that body of literature, on the relationship between Lincoln, the Supreme Court, and the Civil War. The cases that I address here make up two­ federacy, in Indiana, who was tried and sen­ thirds of the three "m"s of the Supreme Court's tence by a military commission-an old form encounter with the Civil War: Ex parte Mer­ of ad hoc military court established by com­ ryman, 1 Ex parte Milligan,2 and Ex parte Mc­ manders for the trial of violations of the laws Cardle. 3 All three case names bear the styling of war and the administration of justice in oc­ "ex parte" because all three were brought on cupied territory. behalf of citizens detained by the armed forces In these two cases, federal courts ordered ofthe Union. All three detainees sought release the release of the petitioners on the ground that under the ancient writ of habeas corpus, which the military had exceeded its constitutional au­ requires the government to show the factual thority. Both opinions contained stirring lan­ and legal grounds for detention to a federal guage about the vitality of constitutional rights judge. I will explain why the cases of the Civil even under the pressure of wartime and the War did not assume the landmark importance, need to maintain checks and balances on the despite their circumstances and language, of a executive's powers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730--1795
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2005 The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795 Richard S. Grimes West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Grimes, Richard S., "The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795" (2005). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4150. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4150 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730-1795 Richard S. Grimes Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Mary Lou Lustig, Ph.D., Chair Kenneth A.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Hawaiians Study Commission.: Report Onthe TITLE , Culture, Needs and Concerns of Nativehawaiians
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 254 609 UD 024'136 Native Hawaiians Study Commission.: Report onthe TITLE , Culture, Needs and Concerns of NativeHawaiians. Final ort. Volume II.Claims of Conscience: A Dissenting Study\ofs the Culture, Needs andConcerns of Native HawaiianS. , INSTITUTION Department of the Interior,Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 23 Jun 83 ° NOTE 194p.; For Volume Iof the final-report, see UD 024 135. PUB TYPE Reports -'Researcb/Technical (143r EDRS PRICE MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Federal Legislationl *Federal,StateRelationship; *Hawailans,"Legal Responsibility; *Needs Assessment; *State History; *Trust Responsibility (Government); United States History IDENTIFIERS *Hawaii; *Land Rights ABSTRACT , Volume II of the final report of theNative ftwaiians Study Commission (NHSC) on the culture,needs, and concerns of native Hawaiians, this book contains a formaldissent to the conclusions and recommendations presented in Volume I madeby three of the NBSC commissioners. Its principal criticism'is.that Volume 'I fails to address the' underlying intent of thecommissioned. study:. (1) to ssoss-the American involvementin the take-over of the Kingdom of Hawaii; (2)`based,on the findingregarding'American participation in the coup.etatWe of. 1893, to ascertainwhether American culpability 'for injuries or damages suffered. :.by Native Hawaiians existedrand (3) to advise about how toapproach. *lid answer any such.Native 'Hawaiian claims. This volume of the :eportfurther states that critical support is lacking for Volume\I'sargument that the United
    [Show full text]
  • REFERENCE LACROSSE PUBLIC LIBRARY 800 Haalh STREET LA CROSSE, WISCONSIN 546«
    REFERENCE LACROSSE PUBLIC LIBRARY 800 hAAlH STREET LA CROSSE, WISCONSIN 546« MARK M. POMEROY: COPPERHEAD EDITOR A Study in Transition by Harry Frederick Bangsberg A paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Course 16:273 in the Department of History in the Graduate College of the State University of Iowa January, 1953 PREFACE Several years ago this writer decided to undertake a study of the activities of Marcus M. Pomeroy, editor of the La Crosse Democrat. noted Wisconsin Copperhead organ. And, as such, this is the initial phase of that study. Much remains, of course, to be done on additional aspects of Pomeroyfs life and actions. Pomeroy!s name had oft "been mentioned in the river city where the writer lives. However, it generally was referred to in a derisive or ill-favored manner. Local elders could see little value in a man who tended to side with the Democrat extremists against Lincoln and the victorious Union as personified in the Republican Administration. Known for his fearless, trenchent and vindicative pen, Pomeroy, tfat least, wrote 1 in such a style that even his enemies could not resist buying his paper." The ensuing paper deals primarily with the editor's La Crosse activities, especially those during the immediate Civil War period. It is not an attempted study of the Copperhead movement as such. Rather, it seeks the reason and explanation why Pomeroy, a Douglas Democrat, supported /Lincoln in the beginning — wijth...qygQA£i^ critic and attacker, reviling the party and cursing the_JLeader. It should be pointed out that although Pomeroy, in 1864, could 2 voice a plea for Lincoln's assasination, such was not always the case.
    [Show full text]
  • Ka Poʻe Aloha ʻāina 1894 He Moʻolelo Hoʻonaue Puʻuwai: Hawaiian Defiance a Year After the Overthrow a Thesis Submitted To
    KA POʻE ALOHA ʻĀINA 1894 HE MOʻOLELO HOʻONAUE PUʻUWAI: HAWAIIAN DEFIANCE A YEAR AFTER THE OVERTHROW A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAIʻI AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN HAWAIIAN STUDIES MAY 2019 By Keanupōhina Mānoa Thesis Committee: Kamanamaikalani Beamer, Chairperson W. Kekailoa Perry Kamoaʻe Walk Abstract There were different and opposing national identities claiming to represent Hawaiʻi in 1894. A year after the illegal overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom, the same insurgents now calling themselves the Provisional Government of Hawaiʻi (PG) were putting on a one-year anniversary celebration. Depending on the newspapers and other records from the day, completely different stories could be told on this same event. The PG attempted to spread political myth as fact, to legitimize their cause, and give them the appearance of embodying American values. Opposing English language newspapers however, were able to unravel many of these political myths, thus delegitimizing the PG and highlighting President Cleveland’s rejection of annexation. Meanwhile, Hawaiian language writers, first demonstrating an intimate and expert knowledge of Hawaiʻi’s situation, then published and used this knowledge to express themselves and find answers in a very Hawaiian way – through the use of metaphor and kaona - to further delegitimize the PG. Because these writings were published and kept, these writers simultaneously preserved Hawaiian thought and action from this turbulent time for Hawaiians today. These stories can act as an example of Hawaiian identity and Hawaiian Nationalism in a time of great political change, thereby perhaps showing one way to move forward in today’s politically changing environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Native Hawaiian Legal Resources
    Bibliography of Native Hawaiian Legal Resources Materials Available at the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Libraries Center for Excellence in Native Hawaiian Law William S. Richardson School of Law University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Lori Kidani 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS CALL NUMBER LOCATIONS.....................................................................................................1 BIBLIOGRAPHIES......................................................................................................................2 CULTURAL KNOWLEDGE AND PROPERTY ............................................................................3 LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES.........................................................................................5 LAWS, CURRENT ......................................................................................................................9 LAWS, HISTORICAL ................................................................................................................10 LEGAL CASES .........................................................................................................................18 NATIVE RIGHTS AND CLAIMS................................................................................................20 OVERTHROW AND ANNEXATION..........................................................................................23 REFERENCE MATERIALS.......................................................................................................26 SOVEREIGNTY AND SELF DETERMINATION........................................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Pdf (352.6Kb)
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN – EAU CLAIRE “LIVING ON THE CRUST OF A VOLCANO” THE OVERTHROW OF THE HAWAIIAN MONARCHY AND THE UNITED STATES’ INVOLVEMENT HISTORY 489 DR. MANN COOPERATING PROFESSOR: DR. CHAMBERLAIN BY: ALISON KELSO EAU CLAIRE, WISCONSIN MAY 13, 2008 Copyright for this work is owned by the author. This digital version is published by McIntyre Library, University of Wisconsin Eau Claire with the consent of the author. ABSTRACT The overthrow of the Hawaiian Monarchy took place on January 17, 1893. One of the debates surrounding this event is the involvement of the United States through its representative, Minister John L. Stevens. 1874-1894 was an unstable period in Hawaii. This paper discusses the reign of King Kalakaua (1874-1891), the economic relationship between Hawaii and the United States after the Reciprocity Treaty of 1876, the Revolution of 1887 that resulted in a new constitution, the overthrow of Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, and the United States investigation of the events through the Blount Report and the Morgan Report. It shows that the United States was not a conspirator in the overthrow of the Hawaiian Monarchy and that it was the result of the process of imperialism. CONTENTS ABSTRACT …………………………………………………………………………………….. ii INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………….…………………. 1 PART I. KING KALAKAUA Constitutional Monarchy ………………...……………………..............……….………. 6 New Stirps for a Royal Family ………...………………………………..................……. 7 The Reciprocity Treaty ………….………………………………………………………. 9 Results of the Treaty ……………….…………………………………………..………. 12 The Merry Monarchy ……………………….………………………………………….. 16 Kalakaua’s Government ………………………...……………………………………… 19 The Bayonet Constitution ……………...………………...…………………………….. 23 1887-1891: An Attempted Revolution and the Death of the King ………………....….. 26 PART II. QUEEN LILIUOKALANI The King is Dead: Long Live the Queen! …………………..……………………….….
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Xiit
    CHAPTER XIIT. ABORIGINAL INII9BITANTS-THE SETTERAL ILLINOIS TRIBES. THEIndians mho lived in and claimed the territory to ~vllicllonr attention is directed mere the several tribes of the Tl!inois and 3Iiarni confederacies,- the Pottawatomies, the Icickapoos and scattered bands of Sharl-nees and Delawares. Their title to the soil had to be extin- guished by conquest or treatise of purchase before the conntrr could be settled by a higher civilization ; for the habits of the t~oraces? red and n~hite,vere so radically diff'erent that there could be no fusion, and they could not, or rather did not, live either happily or at peace together. NTe proceed to treat of these several tribes, obser~-ingthe order in which their names llare been mentioned; and n-e do so in this con- nection for the reason that it will aid toward a more ready under- standing of the subjects TI-hichare to follow. Tlie Illinois were a subdivision of the great Algonquin family. Theil*language and manners differed somen-hat from other surround- ing tribes, and resembled rnost the Miamis, with whom they originally bore a rery close afinity. Before Joliet and Marquette's voyage to t,he Jlississippi, all of the Indians who carne from the south to the mission at La Pointe, on Lake Superior, for the purposes of barter, nere b~ the French called Illinois, for the reason that the @st Indians who came to La Pointe tkom the sontll '' culZec2 tJlenzse1ves IUinois.'' In the Jesuit Relations the name Illinois appears as '(Illi-mouek," " Illinoues," Ill-i-ne-w-ek,'? " Allin-i-wek '? and " Lin-i-wek." By Father Marquette it is "Ilinois," and Hennepin- has it the same as it is at the present day.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States ______
    NO. 07-1372 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ___________________ STATE OF HAWAII, et al., Petitioners, v. OFFICE OF HAWAIIAN AFFAIRS, et al., Respondents. ____________________ On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Hawai‘i ____________________ BRIEF OF THE HAWAI‘I CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS ____________________ SRI SRINIVASAN (Counsel of Record) KATHRYN E. TARBERT O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 1625 Eye Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 383-5300 Attorneys for Amicus Curiae i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page BRIEF OF THE HAWAI‘I CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS .............................. 1 INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE .......................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT................................... 3 ARGUMENT ............................................................. 4 I. THE SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI‘I PROPERLY RELIED UPON THE APOLOGY RESO- LUTION IN APPLYING STATE LAW ..................................................... 4 A. The Apology Resolution Settles A Century Of De- bate In Both The Legisla- tive And Executive Branches Over The Legal- ity Of—And The United States’ Responsibility For—The Overthrow Of The Kingdom Of Hawai‘i .......... 5 B. The Supreme Court Of Hawai‘i Properly Relied On The Factual Findings Of The Apology Resolution In Construing The Scope Of State-Law Trust Obli- gations ..................................... 12 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page II. THE PROCESS OF RECON- CILIATION WITH THE NATIVE HAWAIIAN PEOPLE CONTIN- UES TO MOVE FORWARD.............. 17 CONCLUSION........................................................ 21 iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) CASES Han v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 45 F.3d 333 (9th Cir. 1995).................................. 7 Ishida v. United States, 59 F.3d 1224 (Fed. Cir. 1995)............................ 14 Jacobs v.
    [Show full text]
  • The Savage Allies of the Northwest (Paper Two)
    50 Indianu fiIaguziize of History The Savage Allies of the Northwest (Paper Two) ANIMALSAND GEOGRAFHICALFEATURES OF THE NORTHWEST DECADENCEOF THE TRIBES By ELMOREBARCE Perhaps no country ever held forth greater allurement to savage huntsmen than the old territory of the northwest. Its rivers and lakes teemed with edible fish; its great forests abounded with deer, elk, bears and raccoons; its vast plains and prairies were filled with herds of buffalo that existed up almost to the close of the eighteenth century; every swamp and morass was filled with countless thousands of geese, ducks, swan and cranes, and rodents like the beaver and other animals furnished the red man with the warmest of raiment in the coldest winter. To give an idea of the vast wealth of this domain in fur-bearing animals alone, it may be taken into account that in the year 1818 the American Fur Company, under the control of John Jacob Astor, with its headquarters at Mackinaw, had in its employ about four hundred clerks and traders, together with about two thousand French-Canadian voyageurs, who roamed all the rivers and lakes of the Indian country from the British dominions on the north, to as far west as the Missouri river.1 The “out- fits” of this company had trading posts on the Illinois, and all its tributaries; on the Muskegon, Grand, Kalamazoo and other rivers in Michigan; on the line of the old Pottawatomi trail from the Wabash country to Post Chicago, and in the neighborhood of the Beaver lake regions in northern Indi- ana, and at many other points.
    [Show full text]