DOCSLIB.ORG

INTENTIONALLY BLANK - Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INTENTIONALLY BLANK - Table of Contents - INTENTIONALLY BLANK - Table of Contents 2013 SURF Program Student Abstracts at NIST Gaithersburg, MD ................................................................. 11 Alabama A&M University Travis Hinton ............................................................................................................................................. Tamika Ragland ........................................................................................................................................ Alfred University Daniel Kutzik ......................................................................................................................................... 11 American University Melissa Novy ............................................................................................................................................. Andrews University Thomas Zirkle ........................................................................................................................................... Appalachian State University Michael Aiken ....................................................................................................................................... 12 Nikolai Hesterberg ................................................................................................................................ 13 Zachary Pruett ...................................................................................................................................... 13 Arizona State University Osama Khalil ......................................................................................................................................... 16 Jenna Lynch .......................................................................................................................................... 16 Stuart Ness............................................................................................................................................ 16 Jacob Ward ........................................................................................................................................... 17 Augsburg College Elianna Bier ........................................................................................................................................... 18 Bates College Joanna Moody ...................................................................................................................................... 19 Boise State University Koyuki Fritchman .................................................................................................................................. 19 Eric Nelson ............................................................................................................................................ 20 Kevin Talley ............................................................................................................................................... Brown University Anson Rosenthal ................................................................................................................................... 20 Carnegie Mellon University Robert Buarque de Macedo ................................................................................................................. 22 Dylan Quintana ..................................................................................................................................... 23 Graham Spicer ...................................................................................................................................... 23 3 Central Washington University Richarad Grist ....................................................................................................................................... 24 City College of New York Zineb Bouizy ............................................................................................................................................. Jing Chen ................................................................................................................................................... Marilyn Gauthier ...................................................................................................................................... College of the Holy Cross Julian Goding ........................................................................................................................................ 25 Colorado School of Mines Aaron Glick ........................................................................................................................................... 24 Timothy Straley ..................................................................................................................................... 25 Cornell University Noah Bern ............................................................................................................................................. 27 Duke University Michael Liou ......................................................................................................................................... 27 Jennifer Skerritt .................................................................................................................................... 28 Elon University Amy Zemanick ...................................................................................................................................... 28 Florida A&M University Ronisha Kelly ......................................................................................................................................... 29 George Washington University Emily Fusco ........................................................................................................................................... 30 Danielle Soberman ............................................................................................................................... 30 Georgetown University George Burton ...................................................................................................................................... 31 Timothy Dougherty ................................................................................................................................... Georgia Institute of Technology Max Carlson .......................................................................................................................................... 31 Aidan Clawson .......................................................................................................................................... Gustavus Adolphus College Troy Seberson ....................................................................................................................................... 32 Hamilton College Brandon Wilson .................................................................................................................................... 33 4 Harvey Mudd College Michael Baeder ..................................................................................................................................... 34 Hood College Alex Paxton ........................................................................................................................................... 35 Robert Staples III .................................................................................................................................. 35 Indiana University Kwami Lamadokou ............................................................................................................................... 35 James Madison University Eric Leaman .......................................................................................................................................... 36 Johns Hopkins University Isaiah Sampson ......................................................................................................................................... Elizabeth Skerritt ...................................................................................................................................... Rebekah Wheatley ................................................................................................................................... Juniata College Avery Fordham ..................................................................................................................................... 37 William McGrew ....................................................................................................................................... Kansas State University Brian Blankenau .................................................................................................................................... 38 LeMoyne College Emma D’Ambro .................................................................................................................................... 38 Erin Marshall ............................................................................................................................................. Lehigh University Kyle Stritch ............................................................................................................................................ 39 Lock Haven University of Pennsylvania Kyle Leber ............................................................................................................................................. 40 Louisiana State University and A&M College Chase Brignac ......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iot4cps Deliverable
    IoT4CPS – Trustworthy IoT for CPS FFG - ICT of the Future Project No. 863129 Deliverable D5.1 Lifecycle Data Models for Smart Automotive and Smart Manufacturing Deliverable number: D5.1 Dissemination level: Public Delivery data: 13. June 2018 Editor: Violeta Damjanovic-Behrendt Author(s): Violeta Damjanovic-Behrendt (SRFG) Michaela Mühlberger (SRFG) Cristina de Luca (IFAT) Thomos Christos (IFAT) Reviewers: Heinz Weiskirchner (NOKIA) Edin Arnautovic (TTTech) The IoT4CPS project is partially funded by the “ICT of the Future” Program of the FFG and the BMVIT. The IoT4CPS Consortium: IoT4CPS – 863129 Lifecycle Data Models for Smart Automotive and Smart Manufacturing AIT – Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH AVL – AVL List GmbH DUK – Donau-Universität Krems IFAT – Infineon Technologies Austria AG JKU – JK Universität Linz / Institute for Pervasive Computing JR – Joanneum Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH NOKIA – Nokia Solutions and Networks Österreich GmbH NXP – NXP Semiconductors Austria GmbH SBA – SBA Research GmbH SRFG – Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschaft SCCH – Software Competence Center Hagenberg GmbH SAGÖ – Siemens AG Österreich TTTech – TTTech Computertechnik AG IAIK – TU Graz / Institute for Applied Information Processing and Communications ITI – TU Graz / Institute for Technical Informatics TUW – TU Wien / Institute of Computer Engineering XNET – X-Net Services GmbH Document Control Title: Lifecycle Data Models for Smart Automotive and Smart Manufacturing Type: Public Editor(s): Violeta Damjanovic-Behrendt Author(s): Violeta
    [Show full text]
  • Openo&M Oil & Gas Industry Use Cases with Scenarios and Enabling
    OpenO&M Oil & Gas Industry Use Cases with Scenarios and Enabling Technology Ken Bever MIMOSA CTO [email protected] +1 (513) 276-4105 1 Use Cases 1 Handover Information from EPC to O/O 2 Engineering Upgrades to O&M 3 Field Changes to Plant/Facility Engineering 4 Up-to-Date Product Data Library (from On-line RDL) 5 O&M Asset Configuration Updates 6 Preventive Maintenance Triggering 7 (Semi-) Automatic Triggering of Condition Based Maintenance (CBM) 8 Early Warning Notifications 9 Incident Management/Accountability 10 Information Provisioning of O&M Systems 2 Systems Requiring Interoperability AHMS Asset Health Management System MES Manufacturing Execution System CIR Common Interoperability Registry MMS Maintenance Management System CMS Condition Monitoring System OPM Operational Performance Modelling & Optimization System DCS Distributed Control System ORM Operational Risk Management System DMS Document Management System PDM Product Data Management System EAM Enterprise Asset Management System PLC Programmable Logic Controller ENG Engineering Schematic Topology and PORT Enterprise KPI/Event Portal Instrumentation Tag Configuration Management System ERM Enterprise Risk Management System PSMS Process Safety Management System ERP Enterprise Resource Planning System QMS Quality Management System HMI Human-Machine Interface (Operator Console) REG O&M Product, Structure, Asset Registry with System Standardised Data Dictionary and Taxonomy ISBM Information Service Bus Model SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition LIMS Lab Information Management
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Domain Semantic Information and Physical Behavior Modeling of Power Systems and Gas Turbines Expanding the Common Information Model
    SPECIAL SECTION ON CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS Received October 20, 2018, accepted November 7, 2018, date of publication November 20, 2018, date of current version December 19, 2018. Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2882311 Multi-Domain Semantic Information and Physical Behavior Modeling of Power Systems and Gas Turbines Expanding the Common Information Model FRANCISCO J. GÓMEZ 1, (Member, IEEE), MIGUEL AGUILERA CHAVES2, LUIGI VANFRETTI 3, (Member, IEEE), AND SVEIN HARALD OLSEN4 1Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden 2Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad, San José 10032-1000, Costa Rica 3Renssealer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180-3590, USA 4Statnett SF, 0423 Oslo, Norway Corresponding authors: Francisco J. Gómez ([email protected]) and Luigi Vanfretti ([email protected]) The work of F. J. Gómez was supported by the ITEA3 Project 14018, Open Cyber-Physical System Model-Driven Certified Development (openCPS). The work of L. Vanfretti was supported in part by the Engineering Research Center Program of the National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy under Award EEC-1041877 and in part by the CURENT Industry Partnership Program. ABSTRACT Due to the rapid increase of intermittent energy resources (IERs), there is a need to have dispatchable production available to ensure secure operation and increase opportunity for energy system flexibility. Gas turbine-based power plants offer flexible operation that is being improved with new technology advancements. Those plants provide, in general, quick start together with significant ramping capability, which can be exploited to balance IERs. Consequently, to understand the potential source of flexibility, better models for gas turbines are required for power system studies and analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • A Conceptual Framework for Constructing Distributed Object Libraries Using Gellish
    A Conceptual Framework for Constructing Distributed Object Libraries using Gellish Master's Thesis in Computer Science Michael Rudi Henrichs [email protected] Parallel and Distributed Systems group Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science Delft University of Technology June 1, 2009 Student Michael Rudi Henrichs Studentnumber: 9327103 Oranjelaan 8 2264 CW Leidschendam [email protected] MSc Presentation June 2, 2009 at 14:00 Lipkenszaal (LB 01.150), Faculty EWI, Mekelweg 4, Delft Committee Chair: Prof. Dr. Ir. H.J. Sips [email protected] Member: Dr. Ir. D.H.J. Epema [email protected] Member: Ir. N.W. Roest [email protected] Supervisor: Dr. K. van der Meer [email protected] Idoro B.V. Zonnebloem 52 2317 LM Leiden The Netherlands Parallel and Distributed Systems group Department of Software Technology Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science Delft University of Technology Mekelweg 4 2826 CD Delft The Netherlands www.ewi.tudelft.nl Sponsors: This master's thesis was typeset with MiKTEX 2.7, edited on TEXnicCenter 1 beta 7.50. Illustrations and diagrams were created using Microsoft Visio 2003 and Corel Paint Shop Pro 12.0. All running on an Acer Aspire 6930. Copyright c 2009 by Michael Henrichs, Idoro B.V. Cover photo and design by Michael Henrichs c 2009 http:nnphoto.lemantle.com All rights reserved. No part of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the prior permission of the author.
    [Show full text]
  • A Method for Reusing and Re-Engineering Non-Ontological Resources for Building Ontologies
    Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial Facultad de Informatica´ PhD Thesis A Method for Reusing and Re-engineering Non-ontological Resources for Building Ontologies Author : Msc. Boris Marcelo Villazon´ Terrazas Advisor : Prof. Dr. Asuncion´ Gomez´ Perez´ 2011 ii Tribunal nombrado por el Sr. Rector Magfco. de la Universidad Politecnica´ de Madrid, el d´ıa...............de.............................de 20.... Presidente : Vocal : Vocal : Vocal : Secretario : Suplente : Suplente : Realizado el acto de defensa y lectura de la Tesis el d´ıa..........de......................de 20...... en la E.T.S.I. /Facultad...................................................... Calificacion´ .................................................................................. EL PRESIDENTE LOS VOCALES EL SECRETARIO iii iv Abstract Current well-known methodologies for building ontologies do not consider the reuse and possible subsequent re-engineering of existing knowledge resources. The ontologization of non-ontological resources has led to the design of several specific methods, techniques and tools. These are mainly specific to a particular resource type, or to a particular resource implementation. Thus, everytime ontol- ogy engineers are confronted with the task of re-engineering a new resource into an ontology, they develop ad-hoc solutions for transforming such resource into a single ontology. Within the context of the NeOn project, we propose a novel methodology for building ontology networks: the NeOn Methodology, a methodology based on sce- narios. One
    [Show full text]
  • ISO 15926, and the Data Handover Standard CFIHOS Based on It
    Enabling step-change For managers: About the interoperability standard for process plants ISO 15926, and the data handover standard CFIHOS based on it. ISO 15926 & CFIHOS Onno Paap – https://www.linkedin.com/in/onnopaap/ March 2020 Purpose Interoperability using standards: For data integration ─ISO 15926 For data handover from Engineering contractor to Owner/Operator ─CFIHOS (Capital Facilities Information Handover Spec) Purpose: Decrease risk by higher data quality and save cost. 2 ISO 15926 – what is it? International standard, ISO TC184-SC4 WG3 (industrial data related to discrete products); Neutral layer used for data integration; Federation of databases – Semantic Web technology; Interoperability standard; Interoperability meaning: “the ability of different types of computers, networks, operating systems, and applications to work together effectively, without prior communication, in order to exchange information in a useful and meaningful manner”. 3 What is in ISO 15926? Reference data library (RDL) = A central online database http://data.posccaesar.org/rdl And also a work-in-progress database http://data.15926.org/rdl Data integration and interoperability methodology Open source software http://15926.tools 4 Why did we need ISO 15926? Shell said: We need a data model that can withstand the changes of the times. A process plant can be running for a period up to 50 years while software typically is changing every 2 years. BP said: A system of systems must interoperate through major projects and operations Reference data is critical, but does not deliver interoperability alone Standard connectors are required to deliver interoperability Commercially available ‘interoperability’ solutions depend on fragile, expensive and proprietary integration 5 What is the scope of ISO 15926? ISO 15926 is targeted for data on process plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Exchange Solutions Using ISO 15926 Adaptive Information Model Manoj Dharwadkar, Phd., Director of Technology Management Bentley Systems Inc
    Data Exchange Solutions using ISO 15926 Adaptive Information Model Manoj Dharwadkar, PhD., Director of Technology Management Bentley Systems Inc. Semantic Days 2008, Stavanger, Norway Outline • Bentley Overview • Data interoperability strategy based on ISO 15926 • Bentley’s implementation of ISO 15926 • The role of Bentley Class Editor and Adaptive Information Model Bentley’s Mission Help improve the world’s infrastructure Serving Distributed Enterprises Conceptual Mechanical Construction Financing Procurement Design Design Project Site Structural Fabrication Management Design Design The business of infrastructure entails distributed enterprises A Strong Global Company • 24 years of growth and stability • 2,500+ employees, 80 offices, 40 countries Distinctions 1. A comprehensive software portfolio that is multi-discipline and integrated, just like your projects 2. Collaboration servers that allow distributed enterprises to successfully deliver infrastructure projects 3. A commitment to interoperability to maximize the return on your investments in data Portfolio of Products POSC Caesar IDS and FIATECH ADI are accelerating ISO 15926 • Collaboration between both projects – IDS (Intelligent Data Sets) • Reference data expansion and Methodologies • Online reference data hosting, browsing, and editing • Simple implementation approaches •Training – ADI (Accelerating Deployment of ISO 15926) • Focus on implementation and tools • Reference Data System (RDS) software and utilities •Training • Bentley is very active in both projects Slide: 8 Data
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Conformance Testing for the Engineering Information Integration Standard ISO 15926
    NISTIR 7917 Modeling and Conformance Testing for the Engineering Information Integration Standard ISO 15926 Peter Denno Mark Palmer http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.7917 NISTIR 7917 Modeling and Conformance Testing for the Engineering Information Integration Standard ISO 15926 Peter Denno Mark Palmer Systems Integration Division Engineering Laboratory http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.7917 February, 2013 U.S. Department of Commerce Rebecca Blank, Acting Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Patrick D. Gallagher, Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology and Director ABSTRACT The process and power industries and their suppliers have invested in multiple initiatives to develop and deploy a new information exchange and integration standard, ISO 15926, Industrial automation systems and integration — Integration of life-cycle data for process plants including oil and gas production facilities. Although the potential benefits of this standard have been demonstrated in pilot projects, broad, cost-effective deployment may require improved methods, tools, and testing. This publication identifies requirements for successful implementation of ISO 15926-based information exchange. Currently there exists a draft methodology for information modeling with ISO-15926, documented in a patchwork of ISO-approved and draft-status documents, and supplemented by documents produced by industry projects [1], [2]. However, there are variations and no consensus as to the criteria for achieving interoperability. There are reasons to believe that successful implementation of ISO 15926 - based exchanges will require substantial refinement of the methodology. Further, there are many more requirements for successful implementation – matters of technical sufficiency and organizational responsibility – that have received insufficient attention.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of ISO 15926 for Applying Enterprise Service Bus Technologies in Oil & Gas Industry Solutions
    Dr. Udo Pletat IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH Böblingen, Germany, [email protected] Semantic Days 2010 Tutorial The role of ISO 15926 for applying enterprise service bus technologies in oil & gas industry solutions Dr. Udo Pletat IBM Germany, Boeblingen © 2010 IBM Corporation Dr. Udo Pletat IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH Böblingen, Germany, [email protected] Topic areas Enterprise Application Integration flashback Industry standard information models and EAI – ISO 15926 and Reference Semantic Model ISO 15926 and Reference Semantic Model alignment revisited Relating iRING and IIF from an EAI bus perspective Summary 2 © 2010 IBM Corporation Dr. Udo Pletat IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH Böblingen, Germany, [email protected] Motivation Observe existence of different application integration infrastructures & technologies –Enterprise application level: Enterprise Service Bus approach to connect ERP, EAM, CRM systems –Production Control Level: Open Process Control (OPC) to integrate DCS and MES systems Integrate integration infrastructures vertical application integration 3 © 2010 IBM Corporation Dr. Udo Pletat IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH Böblingen, Germany, [email protected] Enterprise Application Integration flashback to year 2000 Application 1 SemanticSemantic modelmodel // Application 2 syntacticsyntactic representationrepresentation ASBO 1 ASBO 2 Adapter 1 Adapter 2 GBO GBO Integration flows based on Generic Business Objects GBO Enterprise Service Bus GBO Adapter 3 Adapter
    [Show full text]
  • Product Data Sheet Ontology
    NISTIR 8035 Product Data Sheet Ontology Binyam Abeye Edward Barkmeyer Peter Denno This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8035 NISTIR 8035 Product Data Sheet Ontology Binyam Abeye Edward Barkmeyer Peter Denno National Institute of Standards and Technology This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8035 December 2014 U.S. Department of Commerce Penny Pritzker, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Willie May, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology and Acting Director NIST Product Data Sheet Ontology Authors: Binyam Abeye, Edward Barkmeyer, Peter Denno, NIST December 5, 2014 Draft 13 November 2014 Abstract Data exchange transactions for the engineering, procurement, and operation of process equipment depend heavily on product data sheets. Product data sheets are traditional paper forms that serve as the main method of communicating detailed equipment specifications. There are many standards for the layout and use of product data sheets, but there are still problems with the data exchanges that use them. First, most transactions are still done with the exchange of document images, e.g., scanned product data sheets, which have to be interpreted by humans and transcribed for use in a software tool. Second, the commonly used machine-interpretable forms of product data sheets are created using spreadsheet tools, but there is often disagreement on terminology and on the intended meaning of certain fields. This publication introduces the concept of a Product Data Sheet Ontology covering the types of information included on product data sheets. The ontology is a formal machine-readable terminology that is based on industry standard glossaries of terms and definitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Metadefender Core V4.17.3
    MetaDefender Core v4.17.3 © 2020 OPSWAT, Inc. All rights reserved. OPSWAT®, MetadefenderTM and the OPSWAT logo are trademarks of OPSWAT, Inc. All other trademarks, trade names, service marks, service names, and images mentioned and/or used herein belong to their respective owners. Table of Contents About This Guide 13 Key Features of MetaDefender Core 14 1. Quick Start with MetaDefender Core 15 1.1. Installation 15 Operating system invariant initial steps 15 Basic setup 16 1.1.1. Configuration wizard 16 1.2. License Activation 21 1.3. Process Files with MetaDefender Core 21 2. Installing or Upgrading MetaDefender Core 22 2.1. Recommended System Configuration 22 Microsoft Windows Deployments 22 Unix Based Deployments 24 Data Retention 26 Custom Engines 27 Browser Requirements for the Metadefender Core Management Console 27 2.2. Installing MetaDefender 27 Installation 27 Installation notes 27 2.2.1. Installing Metadefender Core using command line 28 2.2.2. Installing Metadefender Core using the Install Wizard 31 2.3. Upgrading MetaDefender Core 31 Upgrading from MetaDefender Core 3.x 31 Upgrading from MetaDefender Core 4.x 31 2.4. MetaDefender Core Licensing 32 2.4.1. Activating Metadefender Licenses 32 2.4.2. Checking Your Metadefender Core License 37 2.5. Performance and Load Estimation 38 What to know before reading the results: Some factors that affect performance 38 How test results are calculated 39 Test Reports 39 Performance Report - Multi-Scanning On Linux 39 Performance Report - Multi-Scanning On Windows 43 2.6. Special installation options 46 Use RAMDISK for the tempdirectory 46 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Vexcel Imaging / Microsoft Photogrammetry User Meeting, Tokyo, September 2008
    Vexcel Imaging / Microsoft Photogrammetry User Meeting, Tokyo, September 2008 Michael Gruber, [email protected] Vexcel Imaging Photogrammetry Products UltraCamXp UltraCam Xp Based on the most successfull UltraCamX Key features • CCD size 6.0 µm (UCX: 7.2 µm) • 195 Mega pixel (UCX: 136 Mega pixel) • Storage system 2 x 2.1 Terra byte (UCX: 2 x 1.7 TB) • Storage system 6600 images (UCX: 4700 images) • New filters for even improved image dynamic UltraCam Xp Projects • 500m flying height ‐> 2.9 cm GSD ‐> 514m strip width • 1000m flying height ‐> 5.8 cm GSD ‐> 1028m strip width • 3000m flying height ‐> 17.4 cm GSD ‐> 3085m strip width Largest digital camera world‐wide Lowest possible collection costs Most efficient digital camera world‐wide Success Story Sales Figures • 244 cameras world‐wide • 101 cameras of UCD and UCX • 47 UltraCamD • 54 UltraCamX Announcement: The UltraCam #100 has been sold in July 2008 Vexcel market share to Geokosmos, Russia, 42% with UCD/UCX by our partner GeoLidar Success Story Sales Figures Announcement: • 244 cameras world‐wide Aerodata, Belgium, • 103 cameras of UCD, UCX purchased UltraCam Xp and UCXp #1 and #2 at ISPRS 08 • 47 UltraCamD • 54 UltraCamX • 2 UltraCamXp • (end of July 08) UltraCamXp Computing Unit exchangeable Data Unit Data Unit Docking Station 4 parallel Download Ports UltraCamXp Largest Image Format 17310 by 11310 pixel (195 Mpixel) On board Data Storage 6600 Frames / Data Unit Short frame intervall (2 sec) 3cm GSD / 60% Endlap / 140 kn Microsoft/Vexcel Aerial Camera Evolution UltraCamD
    [Show full text]