Case 3:07-Cv-00413-AC Document 74 Filed 10/17/14 Page 1 of 198

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Case 3:07-Cv-00413-AC Document 74 Filed 10/17/14 Page 1 of 198 Case 3:07-cv-00413-AC Document 74 Filed 10/17/14 Page 1 of 198 Nell Brown Assistant Federal Public Defender 101 S.W. Main Street, Suite 1700 Portland, Oregon 97204 Telephone: (503) 326-2123 Facsimile: (503) 326-5524 E-mail: [email protected] Attorney for Petitioner IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON FRANK E. GABLE, No. 3:07-cv-00413-AC Petitioner, v. BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF AMENDED PETITION MAX WILLIAMS, FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS Respondent. ____________________________________ Case 3:07-cv-00413-AC Document 74 Filed 10/17/14 Page 2 of 198 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION. .................................................................................................................. 1 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY. ......................................... 5 A. Trial Court Proceedings. .................................................................................................. 5 1. The State’s Case. .............................................................................................................. 6 2. Gable’s Defense. ............................................................................................................ 11 3. Penalty Phase. ................................................................................................................ 15 B. Direct Appeal Proceedings. ........................................................................................... 15 C. Post-Conviction Trial-Level Proceedings. ..................................................................... 16 D. Post-Conviction Appeal. ................................................................................................ 17 E. Post-Conviction Proceedings on Remand. ..................................................................... 18 F. Second Post-Conviction Appeal. ................................................................................... 18 G. Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings. ............................................................................. 19 III. EVIDENCE OF GABLE’S INNOCENCE SUPPORTS HABEAS RELIEF AND EXCUSES ANY PROCEDURAL DEFAULT. .................................................................... 20 A. Evidence of Actual Innocence May Form A Basis For Relief Or Excuse Procedural Default............................................................................................................................ 41 B. The Course Of The Investigation Supports Gable’s Innocence, And The Full Story Bolsters The Recantation Evidence. .............................................................................. 20 1. Background. ................................................................................................................... 20 2. Facts That Shaped The Early Investigation. .................................................................. 22 3. The Media Regularly Reported On The Investigation. .................................................. 26 4. Investigative Leads And Other Suspects. ...................................................................... 29 5. The Investigation Stalled; Media And Political Pressure Mounted. .............................. 30 6. The Pivot To Gable. ....................................................................................................... 34 C. Newly Available Recantation Evidence Supports A Finding Of Innocence. ................ 44 1. Michael Keerins, The First To Implicate Gable, Now Admits That He Lied. .............. 44 2. Expert Scientific Evidence Shows The Interrogation Methods Used By The Task Force Were Highly Likely To Produce False Testimony. ....................................................... 47 3. The State’s Eyewitnesses No Longer Link Gable To The Murder. ............................... 49 i Case 3:07-cv-00413-AC Document 74 Filed 10/17/14 Page 3 of 198 4. New Evidence Shows That Gable Never Confessed To The Murder. .......................... 59 5. The Common Experiences Of The Witnesses Bolster The Recantation Evidence. ...... 87 6. The Scientific Evidence, Together With The Recantation Evidence, Supports A Finding Of Innocence. ................................................................................................................. 90 D. The Remainder Of The Evidence The State Marshalled Against Gable Does Not Support His Conviction.................................................................................................. 93 1. Gable’s Statements To Law Enforcement Are Indicative Of Innocence. ...................... 93 2. Gable Had An Alibi For 7:00 P.M. On January 17, 1989. ............................................ 99 3. The Remainder Of The Evidence Presented By The State At Trial Was Neither Inculpatory, Unique To Gable, Nor, In Some Instances, Relevant. ............................. 108 E. Evidence Of Third-Party Guilt. .................................................................................... 116 1. John Lee Crouse. .......................................................................................................... 116 2. Timothy “Rooster” Natividad. ..................................................................................... 126 3. Samuel “Navarro” Cornejo. ......................................................................................... 131 IV. ARGUMENT. ..................................................................................................................... 133 A. Habeas Relief Is Warranted Based On The Denial Of Gable’s Right To Present A Complete Defense And Other Trial Errors, Particularly, Of Counsel, That Individually And Cumulatively Violated His Sixth And Fourteenth Amendment Rights And Rendered His Trial Unfair. .......................................................................................... 133 1. Gable Is Entitled To Habeas Relief Because The Trial Court Improperly Excluded Evidence Critical To The Defense, Including Evidence Of John Crouse’s Guilt. ...... 136 2. Gable Is Entitled To Habeas Relief Because Counsel Performed Ineffectively Under The Sixth Amendment. ................................................................................................ 155 B. Habeas Relief is Warranted Because Gable’s Sentence Violates The Ex Post Facto Clause And His Counsel Failed To Effectively Safeguard His Ex Post Facto Rights. 172 1. The Ex Post Facto Clause Of The Constitution Bars Application Of A Later-Enacted Statute That Increases The Penalty For A Crime. ........................................................ 173 2. Gable Is Entitled To Habeas Relief Because His Sentence Violates The Ex Post Facto Clause. .......................................................................................................................... 179 3. Gable Is Entitled To Habeas Relief Because Counsel’s Errors With Regard To His Ex Post Facto Rights Violated the Sixth Amendment. ..................................................... 181 V. CONCLUSION. .................................................................................................................. 189 ii Case 3:07-cv-00413-AC Document 74 Filed 10/17/14 Page 4 of 198 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Alcorta v. Texas, 355 U.S. 28 (1957) ................................................................................................................. 170 Avila v. Galaza, 297 F.3d 911 (9th Cir. 2002) ................................................................................................. 158 Berryman v. Morton, 100 F.3d 1089 (3d Cir. 1996)................................................................................................. 172 Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969) ............................................................................................................... 188 Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619 (1993) ....................................................................................................... 135, 154 Brookhart v. Janis, 384 U.S. 1 (1966) ................................................................................................................... 182 Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430 (1981) ............................................................................................................... 180 Burdge v. Belleque, 290 F. App’x 73 (9th Cir. 2008) ............................................................................ 183, 184, 185 Burns v. Gammon, 260 F.3d 892 (8th Cir. 2001) ................................................................................................. 185 California v. Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479 (1984) ............................................................................................................... 138 Carriger v. Stewart, 132 F.3d 463 (9th Cir. 1997) ............................................................................................. 20, 21 Carter v. Bowersox, 265 F.3d 705 (8th Cir. 2001) ................................................................................................. 158 Chaker v. Crogan, 428 F.3d 1215 (9th Cir. 2005) ............................................................................................... 134 Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 (1973) .......................................................................................................... passim Chia v. Cambra, 360 F.3d 997 (9th Cir. 2004) ......................................................................... 138, 139, 142, 148 Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722 (1991) ................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • STAT£ Library Onlypam P
    A0D0D304b55flb3 . 8V94/2 :988/9 OREGON c. 1 0 cr 1 8 1988 SPECIAL LOAN STAT£ library ONLYpam p ' • • *- ' •«* STATE OF OREGON GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8,1988 Compiled and Distributed by Secretary of State This Voter's Pamphlet is the personal property of the recipient elector for assistance at the Polls. BARBARA ROBERTS SALEM, OREGON 97310-0722 SECRETARY OF STATE l« 5 » Dear Voter: Oregonians have a right to be proud of our Voters' Pamphlet. It is Oregon's strongest and most visible symbol of commitment to the democratic voting process. Since 1903, the Voters' Pamphlet has helped Oregonians make choices for their future. This pamphlet provides you with the opportunity to learn about candidates and measures on the General Election ballot in Oregon. It containes three referrals from the 1987 Legislature, five measures initiated by the people, and information on national, state, and local candidates. We have also supplied voters with information on handicapped accessible polling places, voter registration, and the form to apply for an absentee ballot, if needed. Please read your Voters' Pamphlet carefully and cast your vote on Tuesday, November 8th. Sincerely Barbara Roberts Secretary of State On the Cover Crowd in front o f City Hall (on left) welcomes first Oregon electric car in downtown Hillsboro. September 30, 1908. Photo courtesy o f the Washington County Museum. INFORMATION GENERAL VOTER REGISTRATION Your official 1988 General Election Voters’ Pamphlet is divided You may register to vote by mail or in person if: into separate sections for MEASURES and CANDIDATES. Page 1. You are a citizen of the United States; numbers for these sections are listed under CONTENTS on this 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 3:07-Cv-00413-AC Document 114 Filed 03/16/16 Page 1 of 91
    Case 3:07-cv-00413-AC Document 114 Filed 03/16/16 Page 1 of 91 Nell Brown Mark Ahlemeyer Assistant Federal Public Defenders 101 S.W. Main Street, Suite 1700 Portland, Oregon 97204 Telephone: (503) 326-2123 Facsimile: (503) 326-5524 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Petitioner IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON No. 3:07-cv-00413-AC FRANK E. GABLE, REPLY TO RESPONSE TO BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF Petitioner, AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS v. CORPUS ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED MAX WILLIAMS, EVIDENTIARY HEARING Respondent. REQUESTED ____________________________________ Case 3:07-cv-00413-AC Document 114 Filed 03/16/16 Page 2 of 91 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION. ............................................................................................................. 1 II. THE COURT SHOULD REJECT THE STATE’S ARGUMENT THAT THE PETITIONER HAS NOT DEMONSTRATED INNOCENCE UNDER SCHLUP........... 2 A. Petitioner’s Evidence Of Innocence Is Reliable. .................................................... 3 1. The Recantations Are Corroborated By The Witnesses’ Initial Statements Denying Knowledge. ................................................................ 4 2. The Recantations Are Corroborated By Scientific Evidence Demonstrating The Trial Testimony Is The Product Of Interrogation Tactics That Tend To Produce False Statements. ....................................... 5 a. The Task Force’s Use Of The Reid Method Produced False Statements At Trial. .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • City Club of Portland Annual Report 1988-89
    Portland State University PDXScholar City Club of Portland Oregon Sustainable Community Digital Library 1-1-1988 City Club of Portland Annual Report 1988-89 City Club of Portland (Portland, Or.) Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_cityclub Part of the Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation City Club of Portland (Portland, Or.), "City Club of Portland Annual Report 1988-89" (1988). City Club of Portland. 337. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_cityclub/337 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in City Club of Portland by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. CITY CLUB OF PORTLAND ANNUAL REPORT 1988-89 CITY CLUB OF PORTLAND 88/89 Annual Report CITY CLUB OF PORTLAND 1050 LOYALTY BUILDING 317 SOUTHWEST ALDER PORTLAND, OR 97204 503-228-7231 To inform its members and the community in public matters and to arouse in them a realization of the obligation of citizenship. STAFF Nina Johnson Executive Director Sherry Oeser Associate Director Susan McDaniel Executive Assistant Karyn Keith Committee Assistant Chris Karis Secretary TABLE OF CONTENTS President's Message Page 3 The City Club Commitment Page 4 The Ballot Measure Studies Page 6 The Club Research Reports Page 8 Contributors Page 10 Friday Programs Page 12 Open Forums Page 16 Science Breakfast Programs Page 19 Officers & Board Page 20 Standing & Other Committees Page 20 Financial Summary Page 22 CITY CLUB OF PORTLAND 88/89 Annual Report As a member of this remarkable organization, you PRESIDENT'S make an important statement about your commitment to M E S S A G E the community.
    [Show full text]
  • FREDERICK M. BOSS Deputy Attorney General NICK M. KALLSTROM #050023 SAMUEL A. KUBERNICK #045562 RAFAEL A. CASO #073612 Assistant
    Case 3:07-cv-00413-AC Document 101 Filed 11/09/15 Page 1 of 177 FREDERICK M. BOSS Deputy Attorney General NICK M. KALLSTROM #050023 SAMUEL A. KUBERNICK #045562 RAFAEL A. CASO #073612 Assistant Attorneys General Department of Justice 1162 Court Street NE Salem, OR 97301-4096 Telephone: (503) 947-4700 Fax: (503) 947-4794 Email: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Respondent IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON FRANK E. GABLE, Case No. 3:07-cv-00413-AC Petitioner, RESPONSE TO AMENDED PETITION, AND TO BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF v. AMENDED PETITION MAX WILLIAMS, Respondent. Department of Justice 1162 Court Street NE Salem, OR 97301-4096 (503) 947-4700 / Fax: (503) 947-4794 Case 3:07-cv-00413-AC Document 101 Filed 11/09/15 Page 2 of 177 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND........................................................ 2 A. Historical Facts and Trial Proceedings ................................................................... 2 1. Michael Francke’s murder and the crime scene ......................................... 2 2. Eyewitness accounts ................................................................................... 4 a. Wayne Hunsaker............................................................................. 4 b. Cappie Harden ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Justice Reinvestment National Summit Sustaining Success, Maintaining Momentum Hilton San Diego Bayfront, San Diego - Nov
    #JRSummit Bureau of Justice Assistance U.S. Department of Justice Justice Reinvestment National Summit Sustaining success, maintaining momentum Hilton San Diego Bayfront, San Diego - Nov. 17-19, 2014 Agenda Monday, Nov. 17, 2014 11 a.m. – 6:30 p.m. Registration Indigo Foyer 12 – 4:30 p.m. Pre-Conference Sessions (Selected Participants) 3 – 4:30 p.m. Putting It All Together: How the O ce of Justice Programs Can Help Indigo A 5 – 6:30 p.m. Welcome Reception Promenade Plaza Tuesday, Nov. 18, 2014 7:30 a.m. – 4 p.m. Registration Indigo Foyer 8 – 9 a.m. Continental Breakfast Indigo DH 9 – 9:45 a.m. Welcome and Keynote Address Adam Gelb, The Pew Charitable Trusts Mike Thompson, The Council of State Governments Justice Center Denise E. O’Donnell, Bureau of Justice Assistance Keynote: Assistant Attorney General Karol Mason, Offi ce of Justice Programs Indigo BCFG 9:45 - 10:30 a.m. Seismic Shift: California Realignment and Its Aftershocks Moderator: Jenifer Warren, The Pew Charitable Trusts Indigo BCFG 10:30 - 10:45 a.m. Morning Break 10 – 11:45 a.m. Preparing Community Supervision Systems for Lasting Change Indigo 206 The Ongoing Role of Prosecutors Indigo A Sustaining Change Through Communication Indigo E 3 10 – 11:45 a.m. Engaging Judges in Justice Reinvestment Indigo 204A Performance Measures: Using Data to Improve Policy Implementation Indigo 204B 12 – 1:30 p.m. Delivering on the Promise of Justice Reinvestment: The Corrections Directors’ Perspective Moderator: Mike Thompson, The Council of State Governments Justice Center Indigo DH 1:30 – 2:45 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oregonian Portland's New Police Chief Jami Resch Gets Badge, Says
    The Oregonian Portland’s new Police Chief Jami Resch gets badge, says she’s ‘looking forward to what’s coming up’ By Maxine Bernstein January 9, 2020 Portland’s new Police Chief Jami Resch on Thursday said she’s "looking forward to what’s coming up'' with a "solid team'' of command staff to support her as she received her chief’s badge in a brief public ceremony at the Police Bureau’s training center in Northeast Portland. Along with Resch, Christopher Davis received a deputy chief’s badge and Mike Frome, who was a commander of the transit division, was sworn in as assistant chief of operations. All three had been recruits in the bureau’s Operation 80, a large class hired in 1999. Resch was formally sworn in as the city’s 49th chief of police during a private ceremony at the Justice Center on Dec. 31 after predecessor Danielle Outlaw informed the mayor days earlier that she had accepted a job as Philadelphia’s police commissioner. Outlaw, hired from Oakland after a national search in October 2017, served as Portland’s chief for two years and two months. Resch, 45, thanked family members and friends who attended for supporting her and the other police supervisors in their careers. She said she chose Davis to serve as her deputy because of his trusted advice, decision-making and thoughtfulness -- traits she said she relied on extensively when serving as deputy chief the last eight months and Davis was an assistant chief. She said Frohm has demonstrated an ability "to cut through issues and problem solve'' with a calm, cool demeanor.
    [Show full text]
  • Then and Now
    BIGGER MEANING City, schools feel impact of Timbers’ triumph — SEE SPORTS, B1 PortlandTribune TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 2015 • TWICE CHOSEN THE NATION’S BEST NONDAILY PAPER • PORTLANDTRIBUNE.COM • PUBLISHED TUESDAY AND THURSDAY ALBERTA STREET: THEN AND NOW Study documents neighborhood’s changes Alberta Street Project Field Supervisor Deborah Moore and Project Co-director Michael “Chappie” Grice stand in front of the building over past 23 years that housed Portland’s fi rst African-American-owned movie theater, the Albina Theatre, and is now home to the Alberta Rose Theater. STORY BY JIM REDDEN PHOTOS BY JONATHAN HOUSE ast improvements have occurred along Al- City struggles berta Street in the past 23 years: Renovation Ariana Scipioni, of older homes and buildings, around 140 a mother of two Vnew businesses, a big increase in property and trained as a to take action values, and a sharp drop in crime. wildlife biologist, But many of the earlier residents and business says she knew owners are not there to enjoy the benefi ts. They have how dangerous been displaced due to the rising property values and lead was, but as homeless rents. she didn’t know Public school enrollment has been cut nearly in how prevalent it half, with African-American, Native American and could be. camps multiply Asian students being increasingly replaced by whites PHOTO FOR THE and Hispanics. And only fi ve of the 17 churches in the TRIBUNE: ADAM WICKHAM Neighbors say Greeley site not area remain unchanged in name and location. suitable for living, mayor not “Many people had to move Find out more enforcing limits on numbers out of the area and can’t af- Two studies of the area Lead dangers lurk ford to come back,” says Mi- around Northeast Alberta Street detail the changes By JOSEPH GALLIVAN AND JIM REDDEN chael “Chappie” Grice, a over the past 23 years: The Tribune longtime local African-Amer- ■ To read the original 1992 in Portland homes ican educator and communi- study: http://tinyurl.com/ Disputes over fast-growing homeless ty leader.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cycle of Crisis and Violence : the Oregon State Penitentiary, 1866-1968
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1992 A cycle of crisis and violence : the Oregon State Penitentiary, 1866-1968 Joseph Willard Laythe Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Criminology Commons, and the History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Laythe, Joseph Willard, "A cycle of crisis and violence : the Oregon State Penitentiary, 1866-1968" (1992). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 4367. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.6224 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Joseph Willard Laythe for the Master of Arts in History presented May 5, 1992. Title: A Cycle of Crisis and Violence: The Oregon State Penitentiary, 1866-1968. APPROVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE THESIS COMMITTEE: r~ Franklin West 2 This thesis examines seven crises at the Oregon State Penitentiary between 1866 and 1968 which are symptomatic of a larger pathology of power at play at the institution. These prison crises brought the pathology of power out from behind the thick grey walls of the institution and to the eyes and ears of an uninformed public. This arousal of such attention forced the prison to re-evaluate its penal model, enact half-hearted reforms, but then resume to the institution's traditional pattern and style of punishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 3:07-Cv-00413-AC Document 168 Filed 04/18/19 Page 1 of 94
    Case 3:07-cv-00413-AC Document 168 Filed 04/18/19 Page 1 of 94 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON FRANK E. GABLE, Civil No. 3:07-cv-00413-AC Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER v. MAX WILLIAMS, Respondent. NELL BROWN Assistant Federal Public Defender MARK AHLEMEYER Assistant Federal Public Defender 101 SW Main Street Suite 1700 Portland, OR 97204 ELLEN M. ROSENBLUM Attorney General NICHOLAS A. KALLSTROM Assistant Attorney General SAMUEL A. KUBERNICK Assistant Attorney General Department of Justice 1162 Court Street NE Salem, OR 97301 Attorneys for Respondent OPINION AND ORDER 1 Case 3:07-cv-00413-AC Document 168 Filed 04/18/19 Page 2 of 94 ACOSTA, Magistrate Judge: In June 1991, a jury convicted Frank Gable (“Gable”) of six counts of Aggravated Murder and one count of Murder. The next month, at the conclusion of the penalty phase, the trial court sentenced Gable to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Gable has been serving his life sentence since that time. Gable filed this habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in March 2007 and amended his petition in March 2014 to add a claim of actual innocence. Although he exhausted his direct appeals and his post-conviction relief (“PCR”) process, nineteen of Gable’s twenty grounds for habeas relief are procedurally defaulted, but Gable urges this court to excuse his defaulted claims under the “actual innocence” standard that the Supreme Court established in Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298 (1995). This is a stringent standard satisfied “only in the extraordinary case.” House v.
    [Show full text]
  • FREDERICK M. BOSS Deputy Attorney General BENJAMIN GUTMAN #160599 Solicitor General NICK M
    FREDERICK M. BOSS Deputy Attorney General BENJAMIN GUTMAN #160599 Solicitor General NICK M. KALLSTROM #050023 SAMUEL A. KUBERNICK #045562 Assistant Attorneys General Department of Justice 1162 Court Street NE Salem, OR 97301-4096 Telephone: (503) 947-4700 Fax: (503) 947-4794 Email: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Respondent IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON FRANK E. GABLE, Case No. 3:07-cv-00413-AC Petitioner, RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO STAY AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF v. MOTION TO STAY MAX WILLIAMS, Respondent. Department of Justice 1162 Court Street NE Salem, OR 97301-4096 (503) 947-4700 / Fax: (503) 947-4794 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND PRAYER FOR STAY................................................................ 1 II. CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL.................................................................................... 1 III. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................ 1 IV. ARGUMENT...................................................................................................................... 2 A. Standard for Ordering a Stay .................................................................................. 2 B. Respondent is either likely to succeed on appeal, or has a “substantial case on the merits.”......................................................................................................... 4 1. The trial court’s
    [Show full text]
  • December 9, 2004 Jim Redden Portland Tribune 620 SW Fifth
    December 9, 2004 Jim Redden Portland Tribune 620 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 400 Portland, OR 97204 Re: Petition for Public Records Disclosure Order: Secretary of State, Archives Division, Records Dear Mr. Redden: This letter is the Attorney General’s order on your petition for disclosure of records under the Oregon Public Records Law, ORS 192.410 to 192.505. Your petition, which we received on December 2, 2004, asks the Attorney General to direct the State Archivist to produce copies of the following records: 1. All records that have not been released to date related to the investigation into the murder of Oregon Corrections Director Michael Francke and allegations of misconduct or illegal activities involving former Assistant Attorney General Scott McAlister; 2. This request[] includes but is not limited to all previously unreleased documents from the Warden Commission and all documents sent to the Corrections Ombudsman by the Warden Commission and included in the boxes of files known as 93A[-]024. For the reasons that follow, we deny your petition. The Public Records Law confers a right to inspect any public records of a public body in Oregon, subject to certain exemptions and limitations. See ORS 192.420. Any person denied the right to inspect or to receive a copy of a public record of a state agency may petition the Attorney General to review the record and determine if it may be withheld. ORS 192.450(1). Layne Sawyer, Archives Manager for the State Archives, responded to your request in a letter dated November 23, 2004. Your petition states that her letter denied your request.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Penalty the Oregonian
    Death Penalty The Oregonian Irrevocable Broderic victrixes undisputedly. Restless and vigilant Maurits never pertain hundredfold when Sig let-downs his polio. When Tirrell foment his cheating larruped not autographically enough, is Bartolemo exclusionary? At gunpoint on death penalty the oregonian, they must be subject to keep him receiving our compliance with higher financial exploitation of. The penalty in a punishment had the death penalty oregonian, and produce a diagnosis of a hospital on who were led to understand that. Read a bank should pay tv and. Qualifying purchases to a da john foote, originally from around oregon is killing michael francke, we are responsible for using their deaths. If this legislation was also posts articles to reassign death row are seeking love and colors to support us up to appear on death of. Get the oregonian, death penalty the oregonian, walk the latest tips in the lebanon correctional complex in. He was focused an enormous land loss we recognize the oregonian, she said friday. To quality is seen driving dangerous place in cases cost study found by offering networking groups or a part. Every jurisdiction that it comes to be hard look into issues with a lot of execution room or perplexing oddity that, nor joshua turnidge nor joshua turnidge in. Crime throughout her followers online. Each of southwestern illinois governor has installed two studies, engage in oregon college football signee luke hill has been completed. Official website deals for more for cash was destroyed. Witnesses may be. Media assembled in a history of stable housing they result of corrections and other prisoners into oregon eligible dispenser of thousands of drugs used to? Oregon women for people without power, a hardship for an error with snow showers later in a portland foe jeff ellis make their sentence.
    [Show full text]