DOCSLIB.ORG

Kirsten Andersen Calgary School

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kirsten Andersen Calgary School Calgary School v. Supreme Court of Canada: Reference re Senate Reform, Reference re Supreme Court Act, Canada v. Bedford Kirsten Andersen Ph.D. Candidate, York University Canadian Political Science Association Annual Congress 2017 31 May 2017 Ryerson University, Toronto Table of Contents I. Introduction 1 a. Calgary School Members 2 b. Principles 2 II. The Cases: 4 a. Reference re Senate Reform 4 b. Reference re Supreme Court Act 6 c. Canada (Attorney General) v. Bedford 10 III. Conclusion 15 Works Cited 16 “[W]e will not cease from mental fight, till we have built a Hayekian Jerusalem in Canada’s green and pleasant land.”1 -Tom Flanagan, ‘Advice to Progressives From the Calgary School’ I. Introduction This quotation is intentionally absurd, however, it also reflects the most extreme attitudes of a group of Canadian conservative thinkers and political actors known as the Calgary School (‘the School’). Referred to as “a rambunctious, Rocky Mountain brand of libertarianism that has become synonymous with Western alienation,” the Calgary School advocates limited govern- ment, powerful provinces, and unfettered democracy.2 This paper will take the Calgary School perspective and apply it as an analytical lens for examining three decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada (‘the Court’) that illustrate the rela- tionship between Parliament and the judiciary at the tail-end of the Harper era. First, the paper will consider Reference re Senate Reform (hereafter the Senate Reference), where the federal government referred questions to the Court concerning potential changes to the Senate of Cana- da. Second, the paper will consider Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss. 5 and 6 (hereafter Supreme Court Reference), which addressed and rejected the attempted appointment of the Hon- ourable Marc Nadon to the Court. Third, the paper will consider Bedford v. Canada (Attorney General) (hereafter Bedford), where three provisions concerning prostitution in the Criminal Code were struck down as unconstitutional. Each of these judgments reflects an area of disagreement between the federal government and the Court that generated a significant degree of political contention. Interpretations of earlier and similarly controversial rulings were offered by the Calgary School following the introduction of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (hereafter the Charter) in 1982. The School had probed these Court decisions to determine their political precipitants and consequences, and overall im- plications for policy. The analysis undertaken here will unpack the School’s conceptualization of democracy and its particular concerns with the legitimacy of judicial contributions to policy for- mation processes. The School’s notions of individual liberty, government accountability, and rep- resentative democracy are a distinctly Canadian adaptation of classical liberal theory’s most en- during ideas. Far from losing their relevancy, the School’s interpretations of Canadian constitu- tional jurisprudence are helpful for explaining both the outcomes and political circumstances precipitating three politically charged Supreme Court judgments from the past few years. The hegemonic ideologies animating the School are still widely held today by powerful political ac- tors, and for this reason, must be robustly understood. Only then may they be meaningfully chal- lenged and alternatives proposed. This paper will proceed by first explaining the views and ideological underpinnings of the Calgary School by providing an overview of writing by some of its members. The paper will then turn to my selection of the Court’s constitutional judgments, and interpret them using the School’s lens. These interpretations will give equal consideration to the judiciary’s actions and 1 A sardonic excerpt from Flanagan’s ‘Advice to Progressives From the Calgary School’ as featured in Literary Re- view of Canada magazine, December 2010. 2 Mcdonald, Marci, ‘The Man behind Stephen Harper’, The Walrus, Web, 29 Sept 2014 !1 those of the relevant elected representatives. There will be no attempt to moderate or justify the School’s convictions.3 a. Calgary School Members Much like members of any ‘school’ of thought, adherents of the Calgary School do not always explicitly identify themselves as such. While there are numerous students of the School, its founders and most prolific members are an assortment of political figures, academics, and elected representatives. Situated at the School’s centre are its thinkers and educators, namely Barry F. Cooper, Tom Flanagan, Ted Morton, Rainer Knopff, and David Bercuson. The School’s unofficial (but widely recognized) members include mainly right-wing Western Canadian politi- cal actors. These include former federal Official Opposition Leader Preston Manning and former Alberta Official Opposition leader, Danielle Smith.4 As a partisan of the aptly named Reform party, former Prime Minister Stephen Harper established himself politically in the company of the Calgary School members. While it would be misleading to designate Harper as an adherent of the School, the School's beliefs and activities have had an undeniable influence on him. No- tably, Harper’s former chief of staff, Ian Brodie, is claimed by the School’s members as one of their own.5 b. Principles The Calgary School’s principles are most clearly articulated in the writings of its thinkers that have taken up the issues of Meech Lake, Quebec sovereignty, Aboriginal rights, and the ‘problem’ of judicial activism. Concerning the last issue, the School’s opinion is expressed in Ted Morton and Rainer Knopff’s cri de coeur: The Charter Revolution and the Court Party. In this book, Morton and Knopff articulate some of the School’s central ideas that inform the analysis undertaken here. They suggest that following the entrenchment of the Charter, interest groups and government institutions have heightened the Supreme Court’s influence and political power to unprecedented levels. This has facilitated judicial activism and led to a powerful Court capable of making impactful political decisions that come at the price of a well-functioning democracy.6 It is impossible to overstate the legal, political, and social significance of the Charter within Canada. Indeed, the School’s rise to prominence followed that of the Charter—towards which the School maintains a strong suspicion. Rather than the quiet judicial aura that surrounds post-Charter jurisprudence, the School prefers the “sound and the fury” of legislative debate.7 3 Rather, it is some of the School’s more problematic ontological and epistemological commitments that are high- lighted here. My critique considers their most prominent and visible examples. This assessment expresses the hypo- thetical opinions of the Calgary School, regardless of whether they are explicitly and/or consistently identified as such. Opinions presented as belonging to the School are the product of both actual and imagined responses by its members. 4 Supra note 1. 5 Ibid. 6 Review of The Charter Revolution and the Court Party. Canadian Justice Review Board 7 F. L. Morton, and Rainer Knopff, The Charter Revolution and the Court Party, (Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview, 2000) p. 13, 158 !2 Understanding what the School stands for first requires an understanding of what it de- cries. In The Charter Revolution and the Court Party, the terms “Charter revolution” and “Court Party” are used in an exclusively pejorative manner. The Charter revolution refers to a move- ment away from a parliamentary supremacy towards a constitutional supremacy, or, what the School sees as a problematic move towards is “judicial supremacy.”8 The School’s general con- cern is court engagement in policy decisions that subvert existing government legislation. Such subversions are undemocratic because they result in non-elected judges changing the policies of elected representatives. Since judges are not elected, their policymaking cannot be regarded as legitimate. The introduction of the Charter brought with it a judiciary that became more politically active and policy-influencing than ever before.9 Such a judiciary engages in judicial activism. Defined sympathetically, judicial activism is the “inclination by the court to be fairly bold about striking down laws and policies that contravene the constitution.”10 However, Morton and Knopff set out a more severe definition, and refer to judicial activism as the judiciary’s readiness to veto the policies of other government branches (particularly Parliament and legislatures) rather than defer to them. Simply put, the Charter revolution lies in the judicialized, legalized, and rights-based vernacular that defines contemporary policymaking.11 As the former Supreme Court Justice the Honourable Bertha Wilson put it: Thus, the rights guaranteed in the Charter erect around each individual, metaphorically speaking, an invisible fence over which the state will not be allowed to trespass. The role of the courts is to map out piece by piece, the pa- rameters of the fence.”12 The Court Party is best understood in reference to its participation in the Charter revolu- tion. Morton and Knopff state that the Charter revolution “is characterized by the rising promi- nence in Canadian public life of both a policy-making institution (the judiciary) and its partisans (the Court Party).13. The Court Party’s political interests can be broken into five “distinct (albeit overlapping) categories:” national unity advocates, civil libertarians, equality-seekers, social en- gineers, and post-materialists.14 The impact of the Charter revolution and the emergence of the Court Party on Canadian constitutional law and politics is not limited to Charter litigation. The Charter revolution has brought about an increase in the judiciary’s power and influence relative to other governmental actors that has permeated all government-court interactions. With the federal government’s sanc- tion the Charter has shifted the power dynamic between the different branches of government 8 The Charter Revolution and the Court Party, supra note 7, p. 13 9 Ibid. 10 Robert J. Sharpe and Kent Roach, The Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2013), p. 441 11 Supra note 7, p. 15, 21 12 Justice Bertha Wilson, R.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Understanding Stephen Harper
    HARPER Edited by Teresa Healy www.policyalternatives.ca Photo: Hanson/THE Tom CANADIAN PRESS Understanding Stephen Harper The long view Steve Patten CANAdIANs Need to understand the political and ideological tem- perament of politicians like Stephen Harper — men and women who aspire to political leadership. While we can gain important insights by reviewing the Harper gov- ernment’s policies and record since the 2006 election, it is also essential that we step back and take a longer view, considering Stephen Harper’s two decades of political involvement prior to winning the country’s highest political office. What does Harper’s long record of engagement in conservative politics tell us about his political character? This chapter is organized around a series of questions about Stephen Harper’s political and ideological character. Is he really, as his support- ers claim, “the smartest guy in the room”? To what extent is he a con- servative ideologue versus being a political pragmatist? What type of conservatism does he embrace? What does the company he keeps tell us about his political character? I will argue that Stephen Harper is an economic conservative whose early political motivations were deeply ideological. While his keen sense of strategic pragmatism has allowed him to make peace with both conservative populism and the tradition- alism of social conservatism, he continues to marginalize red toryism within the Canadian conservative family. He surrounds himself with Governance 25 like-minded conservatives and retains a long-held desire to transform Canada in his conservative image. The smartest guy in the room, or the most strategic? When Stephen Harper first came to the attention of political observers, it was as one of the leading “thinkers” behind the fledgling Reform Party of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • In Military and Strategic Studies
    CENTRE FOR MILITARY AND STRATEGIC STUDIES Calgary Papers in Military and Strategic Studies Occasional Paper Number 4, 2011 Canadian Arctic Sovereignty and Security: Historical Perspectives Edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer Calgary Papers in Military and Strategic Studies ISSN 1911-799X Editor DR. JOHN FERRIS Managing Editor: Nancy Pearson Mackie Cover: The Mobile Striking Force, an airportable and airborne brigade group designed as a quick reaction force for northern operations, was an inexpensive solution to the question of how Canada could deal with an enemy lodgement in the Arctic. During training exercises, army personnel from southern Canada learned how to survive and operate in the north. In this image, taken during Exercise Bulldog II in 1954, Inuk Ranger TooToo from Churchill, Manitoba relays information to army personnel in a Penguin. DND photo PC-7066. Canadian Arctic Sovereignty and Security: Historical Perspectives Occasional Paper Number 4, 2011 ISBN 978-1-55238-560-9 Centre for Military and Strategic Studies MacKimmie Library Tower 701 University of Calgary 2500 University Drive NW Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Tel: 403.220.4030 / Fax: 403.282.0594 www.cmss.ucalgary.ca / [email protected] Copyright © Centre for Military and Strategic Studies, 2011 Permission policies are outlined on our website: http://cmss.ucalgary.ca/publications/calgarypapers Calgary Papers in Military and Strategic Studies Canadian Arctic Sovereignty and Security Historical Perspectives Edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer Contents Introduction p. whitney lackenbauer
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives $6.95
    CANADIAN CENTRE FOR POLICY ALTERNATIVES MAY/JUNE 2018 $6.95 Contributors Ricardo Acuña is Director of Alex Himelfarb is a former Randy Robinson is a the Parkland Institute and federal government freelance researcher, sits on the CCPA’s Member’s executive with the Privy educator and political Council. Council, Treasury Board, and commentator based in Vol. 25, No. 1 numerous other departments, Toronto. Alyssa O’Dell is Media and ISSN 1198-497X and currently chairs or serves Public Relations Officer at the Luke Savage writes and Canada Post Publication 40009942 on various voluntary boards. CCPA. blogs about politics, labour, He chairs the advisory board The Monitor is published six times philosophy and political a year by the Canadian Centre for Marc Edge is a professor of of the CCPA-Ontario. culture. Policy Alternatives. media and communication Elaine Hughes is an at University Canada West Edgardo Sepulveda is an The opinions expressed in the environmental activist in in Vancouver. His last book, independent consulting Monitor are those of the authors several non-profit groups and do not necessarily reflect The News We Deserve: The economist with more than including the Council of the views of the CCPA. Transformation of Canada’s two decades of utility Canadians, where she chairs Media Landscape, was (telecommunications) policy Please send feedback to the Quill Plains (Wynyard), published by New Star Books and regulatory experience. [email protected]. Saskatchewan chapter. in 2016. He writes about electricity, Editor: Stuart Trew Syed Hussan is Co-ordinator inequality and other Senior Designer: Tim Scarth Matt Elliott is a city columnist of the Migrant Workers economic policy issues at Layout: Susan Purtell and blogger with Metro Editorial Board: Peter Bleyer, Alliance for Change.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinion in Quebec Under the Harper Conservatives Maxime
    Canadian Political Science Review Vol. 11, No. 1, 2017, 1-36 Public opinion in Quebec under the Harper Conservatives Maxime Héroux-Legault Department of Political Science, Concordia University – Email address: maxime.heroux- [email protected] Abstract: An important part of Stephen Harper’s early strategy to form a majority government was to appeal to Quebec voters. Open federalism, the recognition of the Quebec nation in the House of Commons, and international representation at the UNESCO were all measures aimed at increasing support for the Conservatives in the province. This article reviews Quebecers’ reception to several key policy decisions taken by Stephen Harper’s government in the 2006- 2011 time period. It also estimates the impact of these policies on satisfaction towards the federal government, appreciation of Stephen Harper, and voting intentions towards the Conservatives in Quebec. Keywords: Canadian Politics, Quebec, Stephen Harper, Public Opinion, voting behaviour, electoral studies Résumé: La stratégie initiale de Stephen Harper pour former un gouvernement majoritaire s’appuyait en partie sur l’électorat québécois. Le fédéralisme d’ouverture, la reconnaissance de la nation québécoise à la Chambre des Communes et la délégation québécoise à l’UNESCO avaient pour objectif d’augmenter l’appui aux conservateurs au Québec. Cet article étudie la réaction des Québécois suite à l’adoption de plusieurs décisions politique prises par le gouvernement de Stephen Harper de 2006 à 2011. Il analyse aussi l’impact de ces décisions sur la satisfaction envers le gouvernement fédéral, l’appréciation à l’endroit de Stephen Harper, et les intentions de vote pour les conservateurs au Québec.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: a 10-Year Democratic Audit 2014 Canliidocs 33319 Adam M
    The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference Volume 67 (2014) Article 4 Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit 2014 CanLIIDocs 33319 Adam M. Dodek Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Citation Information Dodek, Adam M.. "Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit." The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference 67. (2014). http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr/vol67/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The uS preme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit* Adam M. Dodek** 2014 CanLIIDocs 33319 The way in which Justice Rothstein was appointed marks an historic change in how we appoint judges in this country. It brought unprecedented openness and accountability to the process. The hearings allowed Canadians to get to know Justice Rothstein through their members of Parliament in a way that was not previously possible.1 — The Rt. Hon. Stephen Harper, PC [J]udicial appointments … [are] a critical part of the administration of justice in Canada … This is a legacy issue, and it will live on long after those who have the temporary stewardship of this position are no longer there.
    [Show full text]
  • “Canada” on the Supreme Court in 2016
    DRAFT | CPSA 2017 Please don’t cite without permission Competing Diversities: Representing “Canada” on the Supreme Court in 2016 Erin Crandall | Acadia University Robert Schertzer | University of Toronto The Supreme Court oF Canada’s (SCC) inFluence on politics and public policy – from deciding human rights cases to adjudicating Federal-provincial disputes – has long placed it in the spotlight oF political actors and watchers alike. Seeing the Court as activist or restrained, as siding with the Federal government or as balanced in its Federalism case law, as anti-democratic or the guardian oF the constitution, are all hallmarks oF the debate about its place in Canadian politics. Underpinning these debates is an often-critical focus on the justices’ themselves, the process by which they are selected, and the virtually unFettered power Prime Ministers have had in appointing individuals to the bench. In August 2016, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau clearly established his position within this debate by announcing a new way to choose SCC justices. Along with promoting more transparency and accountability in the process, the key elements oF Trudeau’s proposed reForms were to ensure that all future justices were functionally bilingual and that they represent the diversity of Canada (see Trudeau 2016b). In line with these new objectives, one oF the First things Trudeau highlighted in his announcement was a willingness to break with the convention of regional representation on the bench and move toward an open application process. With the upcoming retirement of Nova Scotia Justice Thomas Cromwell in September 2016, questions immediately emerged as to whether the government would deviate from the tradition of having one of the nine justices on the SCC come from Atlantic Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Court Cour Fédérale
    Federal Court Cour fédérale THE HONOURABLE SEAN J. HARRINGTON THE FEDERAL COURTS JURISDICTION CONFERENCE STEERING COMMITTEE PERSONAL REMINISCENCES At our Jurisdiction Conference Steering Committee meeting, held on Thursday, 22 July 2010, it was agreed that we should focus on the present and the future. However, it was also thought that some mention should be made of the original raison d’être of our courts and their history. As Chief Justice Lutfy is fond of pointing out, Mr. Justice Hughes and I are probably the only two sitting judges who not only appeared in the courts from day one, but also appeared in the Exchequer Court! This got me to thinking how important the Federal Courts were in my practice, and gave me a bad case of nostalgia. Maritime law has always been my speciality (although my first appearance in the Exchequer Court was before President Jackett on an Anti-Combines matter). The Federal Court had many advantages over provincial courts. Its writ ran nationwide. Cargo might be discharged in one province and delivered in another. Provincial courts were less prone at that time to take jurisdiction over defendants who could not be personally served within the jurisdiction. Provincial bars were very parochial, and in the days before inter-provincial law firms, if it were not for the Federal Court, maritime players and their underwriters sometimes had to hire two or more different law firms to pursue what was essentially one cause of action. Doc: Federal Courts_Personal Reminiscences_SJH_18-Aug-10.doc Page: 1 The Crown was a much bigger player in maritime matters in the 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Calgary School Through the Lens of Alexis De Tocqueville
    The Calgary School through the lens of Alexis de Tocqueville Daniel Connor Michaelis-Law A Thesis In the Department of Political Science Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (Political Science) at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada December 2020 © Daniel Michaelis-Law 2020 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Daniel Connor Michaelis-Law Entitled: The Calgary School through the lens of Alexis de Tocqueville and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (Political Science) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final examining committee: ________________________ Chair Dr. Ceren Belge ________________________ Examiner Dr. Daniel Salée ________________________ Thesis Supervisor(s) Dr. Travis Smith Approved by ___________________________ Dr. Daniel Salée, Graduate Program Director ____________________________________ Dr. Pascale Sicotte, Dean of Arts and Science ABSTRACT The Calgary School through the lens of Alexis de Tocqueville Daniel Michaelis-Law This thesis aims to further expand on the intellectual influence of Tocqueville in the Calgary School’s work. It is aimed at trying to better understand the Calgary School and Alexis de Tocqueville. This thesis tries to address a lack of literature on the Calgary School, there is a lack of literature on them and oftentimes they are dismissed out of hand by left-leaning scholars and critics. This project is not an apology for the Calgary School merely to better understand their ideas and the influences behind them. To accomplish this goal three different themes are used that correspond to the first three chapters of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul J. Lawrence Fonds PF39
    FINDING AID FOR Paul J. Lawrence fonds PF39 User-Friendly Archival Software Tools provided by v1.1 Summary The "Paul J. Lawrence fonds" Fonds contains: 0 Subgroups or Sous-fonds 4 Series 0 Sub-series 0 Sub-sub-series 2289 Files 0 File parts 40 Items 0 Components Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................Biographical/Sketch/Administrative History .........................................................................................................................54 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................Scope and Content .........................................................................................................................54 .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Hidden Ally: How the Canadian Supreme Court Has Advanced the Vitality of the Francophone Quebec Community
    The Hidden Ally: How the Canadian Supreme Court Has Advanced the Vitality of the Francophone Québec Community DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Douglas S. Roberts, B.A., J.D., M.A. Graduate Program in French and Italian The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Professor Wynne Wong, Advisor Professor Danielle Marx-Scouras, Advisor Professor Jennifer Willging Copyright by Douglas S. Roberts 2015 Abstract Since the adoption of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982, the Canadian Supreme Court has become a much more powerful and influential player in the Canadian political and social landscape. As such, the Court has struck down certain sections of the Charter of the French Language (Bill 101) as contrary to the Constitution, 1867 and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In Ford v. Québec, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 712, for instance, the Court found unconstitutional that portion of Bill 101 that required commercial signage to be in French only. After the decision was announced, public riots broke out in Montreal. As a result of this decision, one could conclude that the Court has, in fact, resisted Québec‘s attempts to protect and promote its own language and culture. In this dissertation, however, I argue that this perception is not justified, primarily because it fails to recognize how Canadian federalism protects diversity within the Confederation. Contrary to the initial public reaction to the Ford case, my contention is that the Court has, in fact, advanced and protected the vitality of Francophone Québec by developing three fundamental principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Community Health Sciences ANNUAL REPORT 2017-2018
    MAX RADY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE Department of Community Health Sciences ANNUAL REPORT 2017-2018 1 I am pleased to present the Annual Report for the Department continues to evolve with innovations in teaching formats and of Community Health Sciences for the year April 2017 to March content. Community engagement, mandatory service learning 2018. Dr. Moses is on administrative leave during the 2018 and partnerships with community organizations in course content calendar year and I provide Department greetings as Acting Head. and delivery are particularly notable achievements. The Residency Program in Public Health and Preventive Medicine remains A major change in the department this year was the retirement of strong and has seven full-time residents. Ms Kathy Bell in January. Kathy has been with the Department since 1988 and was the Executive Assistant to five Department A Faculty Retreat was held on March 19 in response to Heads. A retirement reception was held on December 14 and recommendations arising from external reviews of CHS graduate department members, past and current, celebrated her many programs. The purpose of the Retreat was to provide direction and valuable contributions. We thank her for her leadership and in planning the future of the graduate programs, and to enhance steady presence over the years, and offer our best wishes on her the department’s community identity. The day was a great success retirement. We welcomed Ms Shannon Turczak as Executive with 45 faculty and 5 graduate students attending. Graduate Assistant to the Department Head in January, and the transition students subsequently held their own retreat to provide insight has been smooth and positive.
    [Show full text]
  • War on the Air: CBC-TV and Canada's Military, 1952-1992 by Mallory
    War on the Air: CBC-TV and Canada’s Military, 19521992 by Mallory Schwartz Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctorate in Philosophy degree in History Department of History Faculty of Arts University of Ottawa © Mallory Schwartz, Ottawa, Canada, 2014 ii Abstract War on the Air: CBC-TV and Canada‘s Military, 19521992 Author: Mallory Schwartz Supervisor: Jeffrey A. Keshen From the earliest days of English-language Canadian Broadcasting Corporation television (CBC-TV), the military has been regularly featured on the news, public affairs, documentary, and drama programs. Little has been done to study these programs, despite calls for more research and many decades of work on the methods for the historical analysis of television. In addressing this gap, this thesis explores: how media representations of the military on CBC-TV (commemorative, history, public affairs and news programs) changed over time; what accounted for those changes; what they revealed about CBC-TV; and what they suggested about the way the military and its relationship with CBC-TV evolved. Through a material culture analysis of 245 programs/series about the Canadian military, veterans and defence issues that aired on CBC-TV over a 40-year period, beginning with its establishment in 1952, this thesis argues that the conditions surrounding each production were affected by a variety of factors, namely: (1) technology; (2) foreign broadcasters; (3) foreign sources of news; (4) the influence
    [Show full text]