DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Program 1 1 Contents Introduction Welcome to Brighton ....................................................................................................... 2 Committees and Executive Board .................................................................................... 5 Past Conferences .............................................................................................................. 6 Exhibitors .......................................................................................................................... 8 Schedule Programme Overview ....................................................................................................... 9 Venue Locations ............................................................................................................... 10 Dome Complex and Wifi Login ......................................................................................... 11 Detailed Programme ........................................................................................................ 12 Poster Listing Poster Session 1 ................................................................................................................ 22 Poster Session 2 ................................................................................................................ 29 Tutorials ........................................................................................................................... 37 Abstracts .......................................................................................................................... 44 Associated Events ............................................................................................................ 176 Author Index ............................................................................................................. 181 2 Welcome to Brighton And welcome to the 16 th Annual Meeting of the Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness , hosted by the Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science at the University of Sussex. The annual ASSC meetings have long been a prominent forum for the dissemination, discussion, and advancement of empirical and conceptual studies of consciousness. Now in its 16 th year, the science of consciousness while still young, is no longer new. In fact it seems to be growing up rather quickly. This growing maturity is reflected both by an effective reaching out to other more established disciplines, and by an increasing delivery on its own core questions concerning the nature, biological basis, and functions of consciousness, in health and in disease. While no-one would claim that the mystery of consciousness is yet solved, it is increasingly evident that much progress is being made and there seems every reason to be optimistic. Equally important is that developments in consciousness science are now yielding clinical insights of real practical importance across a wide range of neurological and psychiatric conditions. A true test of the value of science is its ability to enhance the human condition and the study of consciousness is now contributing here as well. The success of the ASSC meetings has always depended on the active involvement of its members. We are delighted this year to again welcome members from across the world who collectively submitted 403 abstracts, setting a new record for ASSC meetings by some distance. Deciding between talks and posters seemed especially hard this year not only because of quantity, but also because of the high standard of the large majority of these submissions. We believe the final programme showcases this standard while maintaining a happy balance between the constituent ‘themes’ of philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience. Where possible we have tried to mix and match these themes, so that a session of talks might discuss a particular issue from multiple perspectives. Of course the abstract submissions are complemented by a plenary programme of keynote talks, themed symposia, tutorials, and satellite sessions. We hope you will agree that the 2012 line up is particularly exciting, characterized by outstanding variety and depth. Our first thanks must go to all speakers and presenters, whether by submission or by invitation, since without such rich content the ASSC meetings simply would not be worth having. At ASSC16 we are continuing the tradition of involving students in all aspects of the conference. Many of the talks will be given by students, and the student committee, chaired by Adrienne Prettyman, has been very active in organizing student-led events including a social evening, mentor-lunches with senior researchers, and poster prizes. We are very grateful to members of this committee for making all this possible. Some students have also benefited from travel scholarships generously provided by the Mind- 3 Science Foundation and by the ASSC board. Fifteen were allocated in total, balanced across discipline, merit, and need. We have been very lucky to have secured a wonderful venue in the heart of the Brighton, one of the most vibrant cities in the UK (and – fingers’ crossed – one with the best weather too!). Taking advantage of this location, we have been eager to make ASSC16 a true citywide celebration of consciousness science, reaching out beyond the academic community to engage the wider public. Headlining this effort we have organized a major one-day consciousness ‘expo’ bringing consciousness science to life for the public: ‘State of Mind’, which we expect to attract hundreds if not thousands, will not only raise the profile of consciousness science generally but also introduce its basic ideas to broad sectors of the public, including children still in the early phases of school. David Schwartzman, of the Sackler Centre, originated the State of Mind idea and has been instrumental in making it happen and we owe him our grateful thanks. We are also grateful to the many other participants who are donating their time and expertise for the event: full details are at www.consciousnessexpo.co.uk . Other public events include an evening ‘consciousness salon’ where hypnosis will be discussed over a beer or two; our thanks to speaker Peter Naish for volunteering his time for this. ASSC16 is also having fun with social media. A Facebook page has been running for a while and will continue to be updated during the meeting ( www.facebook.com/assc16brighton ). The conference will also be ‘live tweeted’ throughout, with Twitter feeds displayed in prominent locations in the venue. Our thanks to social network guru Dan Bor for arranging the Twitter feed. Join the conversation using #ASSC16. Many other people deserve our gratitude for helping see ASSC16 through. We thank our local committee for their extraordinary efforts in helping organize all aspects of the meeting: Hugo Critchley, Andy Mealor, Nick Medford, Ryan Scott, Jamie Ward, David Schwartzman, and Hazelle Woodhurst. Beyond this committee we have also benefited greatly from the help of Sackler Centre members Adam Barrett, Ron Chrisley, Sarah Garfinkel, and Keisuke Suzuki for their willingness to carry out many and varied duties. For their invaluable input in selecting the programme content, we thank the other members of the ASSC16 scientific committee: Olaf Blanke, Amanda Barnier, Olivia Carter, Frederique de Vignemont, David Edelman, Katalin Farkas, Sid Kouider, and Joelle Proust. We have also depended on a very large number of student volunteers – many of whom you will likely see during the meeting (look out for the t-shirts) – and unfortunately far too many to name here. But we do need to single out Kimberly Warne, Cassie Richardson, and Ella Cooper for their particular dedication. Our thanks to you. We also thank Kate Genevieve and Aneurin Wright for their wonderful graphic design, including the ASSC16 poster and the cover of this handbook. Look out for Kate’s consciousness-science art installation during the conference! The Mind-Science Foundation ( www.mindscience.org ) generously provided $5000 for travel scholarships, complemented by an additional $5000 from the ASSC board. Our thanks (and those of the lucky but deserving recipients) to both. Holding ASSC16 at the Brighton Dome and Corn Exchange involved a large financial commitment. We are extremely grateful to the senior management of the University of Sussex, in particular the Vice- Chancellor Michael Farthing and the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Research) Robert Allison, for trusting in the vision for ASSC16 and enabling us to go ahead. We are also indebted to Andrew Comben, the Chief Executive of the Dome, for facilitating the conference and the expo; working with The Dome’s Delphine Cassara and Morgan Robinson has also been a pleasure. The Dr. Mortimer and Theresa Sackler 4 Foundation has generously funded the activities of the Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science since 2010 and we are extremely grateful to them. Their support has been absolutely central to the development of consciousness science at Sussex and has also been essential in organizing ASSC16. Finally, we thank Olivia Carter for her continuous and invaluable help and guidance from Australia. Closer to home, we want to emphasize our gratitude to Hazelle Woodhurst and David Schwartzman for their tireless dedication to the project over recent months. Without them there would be no meeting. Anil Seth Zoltan Dienes ASSC16 co-chairs Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science University of Sussex, Brighton, UK www.sussex.ac.uk/sackler 5 Committees and Executive Board ASSC 16 Local
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analytic Idealism: a Consciousness-Only Ontology
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/203090 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-09-27 and may be subject to change. DR.DR. BERNARDOBERNARDO KASTRUP KASTRUP Analytic Idealism: A consciousness-only ontology Analytic Idealism: A Analytic Idealism: A consciousness-only ontology Analytic Idealism: A Analytic Idealism:Idealism: A consciousness-onlyconsciousness-only ontologyontology DR. BERNARDO KASTRUP DR. DR. BERNARDO KASTRUP DR. 529173-L-os-Kastrup Processed on: 18-2-2019 Analytic Idealism: A consciousness-only ontology dr. Bernardo Kastrup 529173-L-bw-Kastrup Processed on: 18-2-2019 PDF page: 1 Kastrup, Bernardo Analytic Idealism: A consciousness-only ontology ISBN/EAN: 978-94-028-1400-2 Copyright © 2016-2019 by Bernardo Kastrup. All rights reserved. 529173-L-bw-Kastrup Processed on: 18-2-2019 PDF page: 2 Analytische Idealisme: Een ontologie met alleen bewustzijn Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. dr. J.H.J.M. van Krieken volgens besluit van het college van decanen te verdedigen op maandag 29 april 2019 om 14.30 uur precies door dr. Bernardo Kastrup geboren op 21 oktober 1974 te Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazilië. 529173-L-bw-Kastrup Processed on: 18-2-2019 PDF page: 3 Promotiecommissie Promotor: prof. dr. M. V. P. Slors Copromotor: dr. ing. L. C. de Bruin Manuscriptcommissie: prof. dr. P. J. J. M.
    [Show full text]
  • Tative State Is a Life Sentence. Search on the Minimally Us May Help Commute It
    mmm A Flicl<er of onscious• tative state is a life sentence. search on the minimally us may help commute it ON SUNDAY, AUG. 9, 2009, VALENTINE Filipov, a handsome and energetic manag- er at a refrigeration factory in Pazardzhik, Bulgaria, decided to change a burned-out lamp in his garden. His daughter Anna refers to what happened next as "my fa- ther's ridiculous accident," Filipov lost his balance on the 3-ft. (0.9 m) stepladder and fell, hitting his head on the pavement. The blow put him in a coma for five days. When he opened his eyes, doctors determined that the damage he sustained had left him in a vegetative state, a condition defined by unresponsive wakefulness, in which patients follow a normal sleep-wake cycle, breathe without assistance and make re- flexive movements such as swallowing, yawning, grunting and fidgeting but have Photographs by Peter van Agtmael for TIME ness Window into the soul Valentine Filipov's eyesfollow a mirror during a test doctors used to confirm he has retained some level of consciousness 43 SCIENCE I CONSCIOUSNESS no awareness of their environment and leave remarkable room for recovery. Pa- can't respond to commands. tients labeled vegetative typically stay After FiliI>OVspent a month in the hos- that way-but sometimes they don't. So pital, the doctors discharged him. They where's the line between resignation and told his family there was nothing more hope? Various studies in the past decade, they could do, that he would be in a veg- including one by Belgian and U.S.experts etative state for the rest of his life.
    [Show full text]
  • Coma and Disorders of Consciousness
    Coma and Disorders of Consciousness Caroline Schnakers • Steven Laureys Editors Coma and Disorders of Consciousness Editors Caroline Schnakers, Ph.D. Steven Laureys, M.D., Ph.D. Coma Science Group Coma Science Group Cyclotron Research Center Cyclotron Research Center University of Liège, Liège University of Liège, Liège Belgium Belgium ISBN 978-1-4471-2439-9 ISBN 978-1-4471-2440-5 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-2440-5 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London Library of Congress Control Number: 2012940279 © Springer-Verlag London 2012 Coma and disorders of consciousness (ISBN 978-1-000) was previously published in French by Springer as Coma et états de conscience altérée by Caroline Schnakers and Steven Laureys, in 2011. Whilst we have made considerable efforts to contact all holders of copyright material contained in this book, we may have failed to locate some of them. Should holders wish to contact the Publisher, we will be happy to come to some arrangement with them. This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, speci fi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on micro fi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied speci fi cally for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • Consciousness, Accessibility, and the Mesh Between Psychology and Neuroscience
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2007) 30, 481–548 Printed in the United States of America doi: 10.1017/S0140525X07002786 Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience Ned Block Department of Philosophy, New York University, New York, NY 10003 [email protected] Abstract: How can we disentangle the neural basis of phenomenal consciousness from the neural machinery of the cognitive access that underlies reports of phenomenal consciousness? We see the problem in stark form if we ask how we can tell whether representations inside a Fodorian module are phenomenally conscious. The methodology would seem straightforward: Find the neural natural kinds that are the basis of phenomenal consciousness in clear cases – when subjects are completely confident and we have no reason to doubt their authority – and look to see whether those neural natural kinds exist within Fodorian modules. But a puzzle arises: Do we include the machinery underlying reportability within the neural natural kinds of the clear cases? If the answer is “Yes,” then there can be no phenomenally conscious representations in Fodorian modules. But how can we know if the answer is “Yes”? The suggested methodology requires an answer to the question it was supposed to answer! This target article argues for an abstract solution to the problem and exhibits a source of empirical data that is relevant, data that show that in a certain sense phenomenal consciousness overflows cognitive accessibility. I argue that we can find a neural realizer of this overflow if we assume that the neural basis of phenomenal consciousness does not include the neural basis of cognitive accessibility and that this assumption is justified (other things being equal) by the explanations it allows.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking the Recovery of Consciousness from Coma Steven Laureys, Mélanie Boly, and Pierre Maquet
    Commentaries Tracking the recovery of consciousness from coma Steven Laureys, Mélanie Boly, and Pierre Maquet Cyclotron Research Center and Department of Neurology, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium. Predicting the chances of recovery of consciousness and communication in ior observed in VS survivors, but they will patients who survive their coma but transit in a vegetative state or minimally nevertheless be unable to communicate conscious state (MCS) remains a major challenge for their medical caregiv- their thoughts and feelings. Recent pre- ers. Very few studies have examined the slow neuronal changes underlying liminary evidence indicates that MCS functional recovery of consciousness from severe chronic brain damage. A patients demonstrate improvement over case study in this issue of the JCI reports an extraordinary recovery of func- a longer period of time and attain better tional verbal communication and motor function in a patient who remained functional recovery as compared with VS in MCS for 19 years (see the related article beginning on page 2005). Diffu- patients (7, 8). At present, the vast major- sion tensor MRI showed increased fractional anisotropy (assumed to reflect ity of studies on traumatic or ischemic myelinated fiber density) in posteromedial cortices, encompassing cuneus brain damage are focused on the acute and precuneus. These same areas showed increased glucose metabolism as phase of coma. This creates a silent epi- studied by PET scanning, likely reflecting the neuronal regrowth paralleling demic in which there is only minute atten- the patient’s clinical recovery. This case shows that old dogmas need to be tion devoted to the long-term diagnostic, oppugned, as recovery with meaningful reduction in disability continued in prognostic, therapeutic, and social prob- this case for nearly 2 decades after extremely severe traumatic brain injury.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ego Tunnel by Thomas Metzinger’, New Scientist, 20 March, 2009
    Book Reviews J. Schloss & M. Murray (eds.) The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009 Reviewed by István Czachesz Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies & University of Helsinki This volume is the first collection of essays on the cognitive and evo- lutionary study of religion to encourage a dialogue between scientists and theologians. In the Introduction (pp. 1–43), Jeffrey Schloss sur- veys evolutionary explanations of religion and distinguishes ‘cogni- tive’, ‘Darwinian’, and ‘co-evolutionary’ accounts (p. 16). It appears that Schloss equates ‘cognitive’theories with ones that regard religion as a by-product of Darwinian evolution — a somewhat misleading categorization, which excludes scholars arguing for an adaptive role of religion from the field of the cognitive science of religion. Dominic Johnson and Jesse Bering (pp. 26–43) reformulate the fre- quently advocated hypothesis that believing in supernatural punish- ment has an adaptive value in human evolution. They suggest that individuals holding such beliefs will have a better chance to survive because they have a ‘lower probability of detection’ (that is, as trans- gressors; p. 39), considering arguments about the success of coopera- tive groups only as of secondary importance (p. 40). Whereas some causal link between religious beliefs and moral behaviour is quite plausible, as also argued in other essays in the book, one wonders whether moral feelings (guilt, shame, emotional reward) are not much simpler and cost-effective tools to constrain selfishness and avoid punishment in a group of humans equipped with an ‘intentionality system’ (pp. 34–36). Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17, No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oxford Companion to Consciousness Tim Bayne, Axel Cleeremans & Patrick Wilken
    The Oxford Companion to Consciousness Tim Bayne, Axel Cleeremans & Patrick Wilken (Eds.) New York: Oxford University Press, 2009 688 pages, ISBN: 0198569513 (hbk); $135.00 This impressive tome is the product of considerable effort by its three editors and by many con- tributors. Without a doubt it is the most comprehensive book of its kind now available. While I will go on to make some critical remarks, I want to state first that I think every researcher in the field of consciousness, and every college or university library, should own a copy. The Oxford Companion to Consciousness is unlike two other recently published volumes on consciousness (Velmans & Schneider, 2007; Zelazo, Moscovitch, & Thompson, 2007), each comprising several dozen full-length review essays on central topics in the field. Instead of tak- ing that approach, Bayne, Cleeremans and Wilken have assembled a much larger set of much shorter essays, which cover not just the central topics but also a wide swath of more peripheral ones. The editors acknowledge a debt to Richard Gregory’s magisterial and eclectic Oxford Companion to the Mind (2004), and note that topics to be covered in the book were generated with the help of an analysis of a decade of meeting reports from the Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness. The book is, then, in essence, an encyclopedia—a work of reference. Faced with the challenge of reviewing such a volume in a few pages, one is limited to some rather programmatic remarks that will inevitably fail to convey the book’s full scope. I shall endeavor to evaluate its usefulness as a reference work.
    [Show full text]
  • How Neuroscience Technology Is Changing Our Understanding of Brain Injury, Vegetative States and the Law
    NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF LAW & TECHNOLOGY Volume 20 Issue 3 Article 2 3-1-2019 How Neuroscience Technology is Changing Our Understanding of Brain Injury, Vegetative States and the Law Glenn R. Butterton Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncjolt Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Glenn R. Butterton, How Neuroscience Technology is Changing Our Understanding of Brain Injury, Vegetative States and the Law, 20 N.C. J.L. & TECH. 331 (2019). Available at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncjolt/vol20/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology by an authorized editor of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF LAW & TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 20, ISSUE 3: MARCH 2019 HOW NEUROSCIENCE TECHNOLOGY IS CHANGING OUR UNDERSTANDING OF BRAIN INJURY, VEGETATIVE STATES AND THE LAW Glenn R. Butterton* The author examines clinical studies that use neuroscience technology to study patients in Vegetative States. The studies indicate that some of the patients are, in fact, conscious. The author suggests that this finding is a matter of considerable practical importance for the drafting and execution of end-of-life protocols such as Advance Directives and Living Wills. He recommends that statutes, and other guidance used by patients, caregivers, medical institutions, family members and others to draft and interpret such Directives and Wills, be revised or amended to take account of these results. I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................332 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Brain Function in the Vegetative State
    Acta neurol. belg., 2002, 102, 177-185 Brain function in the vegetative state Steven LAUREYS1,2,6, Sylvie ANTOINE5, Melanie BOLY1,2, Sandra ELINCX6, Marie-Elisabeth FAYMONVILLE3, Jacques BERRÉ7, Bernard SADZOT2, Martine FERRING7, Xavier DE TIÈGE6, Patrick VA N BOGAERT6, Isabelle HANSEN2, Pierre DAMAS3, Nicolas MAVROUDAKIS8, Bernard LAMBERMONT4, Guy DEL FIORE1, Joël AERTS1, Christian DEGUELDRE1, Christophe PHILLIPS1, George FRANCK2, Jean-Louis VINCENT7, Maurice LAMY3, André LUXEN1, Gustave MOONEN2, Serge GOLDMAN6 and Pierre MAQUET1,2 1Cyclotron Research Center, 2Department of Neurology, 3Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and 4Internal Medicine, CHU Sart Tilman, University of Liège, Liège, 5Department of Neurology, AZ-VUB, Brussels, 6PET/Biomedical Cyclotron Unit and 7Department of Intensive Care and 8Neurology, ULB Erasme, Brussels, Belgium ———— Abstract Some of these patients recover from their coma Positron emission tomography (PET) techniques rep- within the first days after the insult, others will take resent a useful tool to better understand the residual more time and go through different stages before brain function in vegetative state patients. It has been fully or partially recovering awareness (e.g., mini- shown that overall cerebral metabolic rates for glucose mally conscious state, vegetative state) or will per- are massively reduced in this condition. However, the manently lose all brain functions (i.e., brain death). recovery of consciousness from vegetative state is not Clinical practice shows how puzzling it is to recog- always associated with substantial changes in global nize unambiguous signs of conscious perception of metabolism. This finding led us to hypothesize that some the environment and of the self in these patients. vegetative patients are unconscious not just because of a This difficulty is reflected by frequent misdiag- global loss of neuronal function, but rather due to an noses of locked-in syndrome, coma, minimally altered activity in some critical brain regions and to the et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hard Problem of Consciousness Torin Alter, [email protected]
    The Hard Problem of Consciousness Torin Alter, [email protected] [An abridged version of this will appear in the Oxford Companion to Consciousness, edited by Tim Bayne, Axel Cleeremans and Patrick Wilken] 1. The problem As I type these words, cognitive systems in my brain engage in visual and auditory information processing. This processing is accompanied by subjective states of consciousness, such as the auditory experience of hearing the tap-tap-tap of the keyboard and the visual experience of seeing the letters appear on the screen. How does the brain’s activity generate such experiences? Why should it be accompanied by conscious experience in the first place? This is the hard problem of consciousness. The hard problem should be distinguished from various easy problems familiar to cognitive scientists. Examples include problems of explaining the reportability of one’s own states of consciousness, the integration of information, the discrimination and categorization of environmental stimuli, the focus of attention, and the deliberate control of behavior. For all such phenomena, the challenge is to explain how some function is performed. By contrast, the hard problem does not appear to be a problem of explaining the performance of functions. For every function associated with consciousness, the question remains: why is the performance of that function accompanied by experience? For contrast, consider reportability. This feature is functionally definable, roughly as the ability to accurately describe one’s experiences. To explain this ability, one specifies a neurophysiological or cognitive mechanism that performs it. If the mechanism explains the ability, then nothing about reportability remains to be explained.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I Consciousness and Intention: Decoding Mental States and Decision Making
    CONTENTS Notes on the Contributors xxm List of Abbreviations xxxv PART I CONSCIOUSNESS AND INTENTION: DECODING MENTAL STATES AND DECISION MAKING 1. Brain reading: decoding mental states from brain activity in humans 3 JOHN-DYLAN HAYNES 2. The neurobiology of pleasure and happiness 15 MORTEN L. KRINGELBACH AND KENT C. BERRIDGE 3. The neurobiological basis of morality 33 CHRISTOPHER SUHLER AND PATRICIA CHURCHLAND 4. Development of the adolescent brain: neuroethical implications for the understanding of executive function and social cognition 59 MONICA LUCIANA 5. Neural foundations to conscious and volitional control of emotional behavior: a mentalistic perspective 83 MARIO BEAUREGARD 6. Neural correlates of deception 101 GIORGIO GANIS AND J. PETER ROSENFELD 7. Understanding disorders of consciousness 119 CAMILLE CHATELLE AND STEVEN LAUREYS 8. Functional magnetic resonance imaging, covert awareness, and brain injury 135 ADRIAN M. OWEN XVIII CONTENTS PART II RESPONSIBILITY AND DETERMINISM 9. Genetic determinism, neuronal determinism, and determinism tout court 151 BERNARD BAERTSCHI AND ALEXANDRE MAURON 10. The rise of neuroessentialism 161 PETER B. REINER 11. A neuroscientific approach to addiction: ethical concerns 177 MARTINA RESKE AND MARTIN P. PAULUS 12. The neurobiology of addiction: implications for voluntary control of behavior 203 STEVEN E. HYMAN 13. Neuroethics of free will 219 PATRICK HAGGARD PART III MIND AND BODY 14. Pharmaceutical cognitive enhancement 229 SHARON MOREIN-ZAMIR AND BARBARA J. SAHAKIAN 15. Cognitive enhancement 245 THOMAS METZINGER AND ELISABETH HILDT 16. Chemical cognitive enhancement: is it unfair, unjust, discriminatory, or cheating for healthy adults to use smart drugs? 265 JOHN HARRIS 17. Cognitive enhancement in courts 273 ANDERS SANDBERG, WALTER SINNOTT-ARMSTRONG, AND JULIAN SAVULESCU 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Consciousness, Accessibility, and the Mesh Between Psychology
    Forthcoming in Behavioral and Brain Sciences Consciousness, Accessibility, and the Mesh between Psychology and Neuroscience Ned Block New York University Abstract How can we disentangle the neural basis of phenomenal consciousness from the neural machinery of the cognitive access that underlies reports of phenomenal consciousness? We can see the problem in stark form if we ask how we could tell whether representations inside a Fodorian module are phenomenally conscious. The methodology would seem straightforward: find the neural natural kinds that are the basis of phenomenal consciousness in clear cases when subjects are completely confident and we have no reason to doubt their authority, and look to see whether those neural natural kinds exist within Fodorian modules. But a puzzle arises: do we include the machinery underlying reportability within the neural natural kinds of the clear cases? If the answer is ‘Yes’, then there can be no phenomenally conscious representations in Fodorian modules. But how can we know if the answer is ‘Yes’? The suggested methodology requires an answer to the question it was supposed to answer! The paper argues for an abstract solution to the problem and exhibits a source of empirical data that is relevant, data that show that in a certain sense phenomenal consciousness overflows cognitive accessibility. I argue that we can find a neural realizer of this overflow if assume that the neural basis of phenomenal consciousness does not include the neural basis of cognitive accessibility and that this assumption is justified (other things being equal) by the explanations it allows. Introduction In The Modularity of Mind, Jerry Fodor argued that significant early portions of our perceptual systems are modular in a number of respects, including that we do not have cognitive access to their internal states and representations of a sort that would allow reportability (Fodor, 1983; see also Pylylshyn, 2003; Sperber, 2001).
    [Show full text]