2 Development Resource Documents
The Arts Plan 1999-2001: consultative review Page 2 Preface 3 1 Introduction 5 2 General Themes 6 Contexts of the Arts 7 The Core and the Periphery 9 Education 10 Access 12 Technology 13 3 Sectoral Themes 14 Dance 15 Drama 16 Film 17 Literature 19 Music 20 Opera 21 Visual Arts 23 4 Concluding Comments 24 5 Appendices 24 Appendix 1: National, sectoral and local consultative meetings 25 Appendix 2: Submissions received
ISBN 0 906627 85 0
The Arts Council 70 Merrion Square Dublin 2 Ireland
Telephone 353 1 618 0200 Callsaver 1850 392 492 Facsimile 353 1 661 0349 353 1 676 1302 E-mail [email protected] http:// www.artscouncil.ie The Arts Plan 1999-2001: consultative review
June 1999 The Arts Plan 1999 - 2001: consultative review
Preface
The process of preparing to make a second against which change in the coming years can Arts Plan was informed, as was the making of be measured. the first plan, by invited submissions from practitioners of the arts and other interested This is not to make any great claims for the parties from all over Ireland. ability of a slender volume to represent a very broad range or views in anything more than a In embarking on a second plan, the Arts fairly summary way. Also, there is a good deal Council undertook a series of public dialogues, of “on the one hand, and on the other ...” which in centres throughout the country, about the is perhaps the only way of representing a future needs of the arts. healthy diversity of opinion.
This review represents a necessarily It is something of an irony that the arts, which abbreviated summary of a great deal of do not lack for vocal and articulate proponents, discussion and written submission that still lack a coherent independent lobby in emerged from the process. Ireland. Traditionally, this role has been left to the Arts Council itself to fill, as a branch of its The written transcripts of these various advocacy function. Perhaps it is time for the consultative meetings are of course available, Arts Council to ask if artists and people who but they are both very extensive and somewhat care about the value of art are doing enough to unwieldy, representing as they do the communicate these often passionately-held extemporary utterances of a broad range of convictions to the rest of society? people in a series of public meetings held around the country from May 1998, culminating By telling others what people working in the in October in twelve half-day sessions devoted sector have told to each other and to us, we to specific artforms and issues. hope to make a contribution to the development of greater public recognition of the value of the These meetings, which were attended by many arts to the richness of our culture and ultimately Arts Council members as well as staff, have to our civic society. informed the drafting of the second Arts Plan Brian Farrell, Chairman 1999-2001. The Arts Council/An Chomhairle Ealaíon June, 1999 The Arts Council decided to publish a summary of these proceedings for two principal reasons. One was to illustrate the sector to itself and to others, in a way that would help to explain how the Arts Council came by the strategic choices which are to be found in the plan. The second reason is equally important. It is to establish a benchmark of opinion within and about the arts
4 The Arts Plan 1999 - 2001: consultative review
1 | Introduction
The establishment of the Arts Council/An Ireland. The announcement of the process Chomhairle Ealaíon in 1951 significantly leading to the development of the first plan improved a record of relative neglect of the generated an enormous number of arts in Ireland. The creation of a cabinet submissions which were widely reflected in the portfolio in the area of the Arts and the philosophy and detailed shape of that plan. subsequent adoption by government of the The great diversity and number of submissions first Arts Plan (1995-1998) did a great deal to generated on that occasion, without any move the arts closer to the centre of public structured framework, created difficulties in policy in Ireland. distilling coherent themes and arguments. In developing a consultative process on this The development of the arts portfolio under occasion, therefore, the Arts Council decided the current government and the that more benefit could be derived from commissioning of the Arts Plan 1999-2001 structuring part of the consultative process in consolidates this achievement and further a more formal way. secures a view of citizenship in which cultural values have a central significance. The The very structure of the many and diverse consultative process which has been so contributions to this consultative process central to the development of both Arts Plans prompts reflection. The Arts Council and to date is widely endorsed and valued and is individual artists have traditionally applied a itself a product of the current phase of policy sectoral approach to their activities and this evolution. approach has been underpinned in legislation. The narrow framework of thought which has The arts community in Ireland has never resulted has shaped debate in all fields of lacked a voice in presenting its case to artistic policy and is manifest in the partisan relevant decision-makers. However, until the claims on funding and resources. Significant development of the first Arts Plan, individual, increases in funding have meant that these sectoral and overall arts community conflicts have abated somewhat in recent representations and proposals were made years. However, the views of many without a formally written policy context. While contributors still represent a partial or narrowly there was always a philosophical basis and sectoral view (e.g. “music should receive 12% clear-sighted specific objectives (and any of the Arts Council’s budget”). scrutiny of the work of the Arts Council since its foundation indicates clear choices and The sectoral approach has significantly distinct and changing priorities) these were shaped analysis, criticism and the nature of not the result of a formalised, documented new proposals. Thinking formed in planning process. circumstances of scarcity is unlikely to fit in times which call for a visionary approach to It is against this background that the arts the investment of greater resources. It is true community responded to an invitation for input that in more recent years some consideration into an overall policy framework for the arts in has been given to some cross-sectoral issues
5 The Arts Plan 1999 - 2001: consultative review
1 | Introduction
and this dual perspective (i.e. sectoral and cross-sectoral) was reflected in many of the contributions to the debate and thus in the commentary offered in this document.
One priority, which characterised all the written submissions and much of the oral debate, was that of resources. In general, resource arguments tended to be either about claims on the sharing of existing resources or about increasing the overall amount of resources available. The latter approach dominated.
Well-established cross-sectoral themes include those relating to access and to education. Newer cross-sectoral concerns emerged in this consultation process, sometimes explicitly stated but more often implicit, and these included the issues of centralisation and devolution noted in the section ‘The Core and the Periphery’. Technology also raised questions which, in a few short years, have moved to the centre of the debate.
The major themes of the consultative process are summarised here, whether derived from written or oral sources. The material is organised according first to general cross- sectoral themes and subsequently to sector- specific interests.
Note Quotations are taken from written submissions or contributions at the consultative fora.
6 The Arts Plan 1999 - 2001: consultative review
2 | General Themes