CBD Third National Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CBD Third National Report Third National Report of Georgia to the Convention on Biological Diversity The Ministry of Environmental Protection of Georgia Center for the Convseration of Species NACRES 1 CONTENTS A. REPORTING PARTY...................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Information on the preparation of the report ..........................................................................4 B. PRIORITY SETTING, TARGETS AND OBSTACLES ..........................................................................5 Priority Setting .....................................................................................................................7 Challenges and Obstacles to Implementation..........................................................................8 2010 Target .......................................................................................................................12 Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC) .....................................................................47 Ecosystem Approach...........................................................................................................65 C. ARTICLES OF THE CONVENTION ..............................................................................................68 Article 5 – Cooperation .......................................................................................................68 Article 6 - General measures for conservation and sustainable use.........................................71 Biodiversity and Climate Change....................................................................................73 Article 7 - Identification and monitoring ...............................................................................75 Decisions on Taxonomy.................................................................................................78 Article 8 - In-situ conservation [Excluding paragraphs (a) to (e), (h) and (j)] .........................82 Programme of Work on Protected Areas (Article 8 (a) to (e)) ...........................................85 Article 8(h) - Alien species ..................................................................................................92 Article 8(j) - Traditional knowledge and related provisions.....................................................97 GURTS.........................................................................................................................97 Status and Trends ........................................................................................................97 Akwé:Kon Guidelines ....................................................................................................97 Capacity Building and Participation of Indigenous and Local Communities.........................98 Support to implementation..........................................................................................100 Article 9 - Ex-situ conservation..........................................................................................101 Article 10 - Sustainable use of components of biological diversity.........................................104 Biodiversity and Tourism.............................................................................................107 Article 11 - Incentive measures .........................................................................................110 Article 12 - Research and training......................................................................................112 Article 13 - Public education and awareness .......................................................................114 Article 14 - Impact assessment and minimizing adverse impacts..........................................120 Article 15 - Access to genetic resources..............................................................................125 Article 16 - Access to and transfer of technology.................................................................130 Programme of Work on transfer of technology and technology cooperation .....................131 Article 17 - Exchange of information ..................................................................................134 Article 18 - Technical and scientific cooperation ..................................................................136 Article 19 - Handling of biotechnology and distribution of its benefits ...................................138 Article 20 – Financial resources .........................................................................................141 D. THEMATIC AREAS .................................................................................................................148 Inland water ecosystems...................................................................................................151 Marine and coastal biological diversity................................................................................154 General.........................................................................................................................154 Implementation of Integrated Marine and Coastal Area Management.................................155 Marine and Coastal Living Resources...............................................................................156 Mariculture....................................................................................................................159 Alien Species and Genotypes..........................................................................................161 Agricultural biological diversity ..........................................................................................162 Annex to decision V/5 - Programme of work on agricultural biodiversity ............................163 Forest Biological Diversity .................................................................................................168 General.........................................................................................................................168 Expanded programme of work on forest biological diversity ..............................................170 Biological diversity of dry and sub-humid lands...................................................................179 Mountain Biodiversity........................................................................................................182 E. OPERATIONS OF THE CONVENTION........................................................................................188 F. COMMENTS ON THE FORMAT..................................................................................................189 2 3 Information on the preparation of the report Box I. Please provide information on the preparation of this report, including information on stakeholders involved and material used as a basis for the report. This report was elaborated with support from the Global Environmental Facility (GEF) and the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), within the framework of the project “Assistance in Biodiversity Capacity Building, Participation in the Mechanism of Biodiversity Resource Centre, Preparation of the Second and Third National Reports to the Convention on Biological Diversity”. The project is being implemented in close cooperation between the Center for the Conservation of Species NACRES and The Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Georgia. Georgia received financial assistance to create the Second and Third National Reports to the Con- vention on Biological Diversity in late 2008 thus was unable to meet the submission deadlines of submission as defined by Resolutions of the Conference of the Parties (Resolutions V/19 and VII/25). This project needed consultation and training in order for the Reports to fully reflect the processes on the local level regarding the Articles and Resolutions of the Convention. The Report describes the status of implementation of the Convention in Georgia from 2002-2005. It discusses the activities implemented in the given period and their results, as well as the background situation and problems in the fields of biodiversity conservation and sustainable use. The elaborate the National Report was coordinated by the Center for the Conservation of Species, NACRES. The following experts of the Center were involved for the elaboration: Anna Rukhadze, Chief Specialist of the Biodiversity Protection Service of The Ministry of Envi- ronmental Protection and Natural Resources of Georgia (Responsible for the elaborate the docu- ment); Dr. Irakli Macharashvili, Association “Green Alternative” (Forest Biodiversity); Dr.Gia Sofadze, Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University (Research and training, public education, technical and scientific cooperation). For creating this document, interviews and consultations were held at the following departments, scientific research institutes and NGOs: State Agencies: The Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources: o The Department of Integrated Management of the Environment; o Environmental Protection Inspection; o Department of Protected Areas; o Forest Department; The Department of International Relations and Policy; The Ministry of Agriculture; The Ministry of Education and Science. Scientific research Institutes and Educational Institutions: Tbilisi Botanical Garden and the Institute of Botany; Batumi Botanical Gardens; The Institute of Zoology; Kanchaveli Institute of Plant Protection; Gulisashvili Forest Institute; The Institute of Agriculture;
Recommended publications
  • RBMP SEA Report ENG FINAL
    European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SEA) OF THE DRAFTALAZANI-IORI RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN SEA Report November 2020 2 This SEA report was prepared by the national SEA team established for the pilot project “The Application of a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) for the Draft Alazani-Iori River Basin Management Plan” (hereinafter also the SEA pilot project): Ms. Elina Bakradze (water and soil quality aspects), Ms. Anna Rukhadze (biodiversity, habitats and protected areas), Ms. Lela Serebryakova (health related aspects), Mr. Giorgi Guliashvili (hydrology and natural hazards), Mr. Davit Darsavelidze (socio-economic aspects), Mr. Irakli Kobulia (cultural heritage aspects and GIS) and the UNECE national consultant Ms. Irma Melikishvili (the team leader also covering climate change aspects), under the guidance and supervision of the UNECE international consultant Mr. Martin Smutny. Maps: The thematic maps presented in the SEA Report are produced by Mr. Irakli Kobulia on the basis of the GIS database provided by the EUWI + programme. The SEA Report also includes maps developed in the framework of the EUWI + programme (under result 2) by the REC Caucasus, subcontractor of the EUWI+ programme. The SEA pilot project was carried out under the supervision of Mr. Alisher Mamadzhanov, the EUWI+ programme leader from UNECE with the support provided by Ms. Christine Kitzler and Mr. Alexander Belokurov, UNECE and Ms. Eliso Barnovi, the EUWI+ Country Representative
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Action Plan
    Environmental and Social Impact Assessment – Part 6 Project Number: 47919 April 2014 GEO: Adjaristsqali Hydropower Project Prepared by Mott MacDonald and Adjaristsqali Georgia LLC for the Asian Development Bank The environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “Terms of Use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Biodiversity Action Plan Adjaristsqali Hydropower Cascade Project December 2013 Adjaristsqali Georgia LLC Biodiversity290039 EVT Action EMS 01Plan A http://pims01/pims/llisapi.dll/open/1516754514 1 November 2012 Adjaristsqali Hydropower Cascade Project December 2013 Adjaristsqali Georgia LLC 1. Abashidze Street 6, 6010 Batumi, Georgia Mott MacDonald, Demeter House, Station Road, Cambridge CB1 2RS, United Kingdom t +44 (0)1223 463500 f +44 (0)1223 461007, www.mottmac.com Biodiversity Action Plan Issue and revision record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description A 2/11/2012 Celia Figueira Vanessa Hovland Caroline McParland Draft for client review Mihai Coroi Tristan Folland Róisín Ní Mhathúna B 29/11/2012 Mihai Coroi Vanessa Hovland Final Draft
    [Show full text]
  • GEF-6 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION FORM (PIF) PROJECT TYPE: Medium-Sized Project TYPE of TRUST FUND: GEF Trust Fund
    GEF-6 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION FORM (PIF) PROJECT TYPE: Medium-sized Project TYPE OF TRUST FUND: GEF Trust Fund FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT GEF, VISIT THEGEF.ORG PART I: PROJECT IDENTIFICATION Project Title: Enhancing financial sustainability of the Protected Area system in Georgia Country(ies): Georgia GEF Project ID: 9879 GEF Agency(ies): UNDP GEF Agency Project ID: 6138 Other Executing Ministry of Environment and Natural Submission Date: October 26, 2017 Partner(s): Resources Protection of Georgia; Caucasus Nature Fund (CNF) GEF Focal Area(s): Biodiversity Project Duration (Months) 60 Integrated Approach IAP-Cities IAP-Commodities IAP-Food Security Corporate Program: SGP Pilot Name of parent program: N/A Agency Fee ($) 173,516 A. INDICATIVE FOCAL AREA STRATEGY FRAMEWORK AND OTHER PROGRAM STRATEGIES: (in $) Objectives/Programs (Focal Areas, Integrated Approach Pilot, Trust Fund GEF Project Co- Corporate Programs) Financing financing BD-1 Program 1 GEFTF 1,826,484 7,873,516 Total Project Costs 1,826,484 7,873,516 B. INDICATIVE PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY Project Objective: To secure long-term financial sustainability and effective management to conserve globally significant biodiversity of target protected areas in Georgia (in $) Finan- Project Trust cing Project Outcomes Project Outputs GEF Co- Components Fund Project financing Type Financing 1. Financial TA Twelve PAs (KBAs) 1.1 A range of sustainable GEFTF 642,691 7,098,516 sustainability of covering 420,000 ha financing mechanisms designed sub-system of with globally and piloted for target PAs PAs important through a pool of financial representing biodiversity are resources from government and Key effectively and non-governmental sectors under Biodiversity sustainably the Caucasus Nature Fund Areas (KBAs) financed, as (CNF).
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences Diagnostic Analysis Of
    Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 8(8) July 2014, Pages: 31-41 AENSI Journals Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences ISSN:1995-0772 EISSN: 1998-1090 Journal home page: www.aensiweb.com/ANAS Diagnostic Analysis of National Parks in Georgia in context of Ecotourism 1Tamari Poladashvili, Dr., 2António Cardoso, Ph.D., 3Álvaro Cairrão, Ph.D. 1Master Student in Business Sciences University Fernando Pessoa Porto-Portugal 2Professor at University Fernando Pessoa Coordinator of Bacharelor and Master Degree’s in Business Sciences Porto-Portugal 3Professor atUniversity de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro School of Human and Social Sciences Vila Real-Portugal ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Today it is already acknowledged that tourism can be successfully used to increase Received 2 April 2014 economic development in local and national level. According to the World Wildlife Received in revised form Fund (1995), ecotourism takes 15 % from all tourism worldwide, so is not a small part 13 May 2014 of nature tourism. Thus, world is facing several problems, for instance: a global crisis Accepted 28 May 2014 due to global warming and other environmental issues, that makes the questions that Available online 27 June 2014 society has to answer. As far environmental issues are directly linked to green marketingthe given paper argues the importance of ecotourism in the context of green Keywords: marketing. After a proper introduction of theoretical framework, the paperpresents the Ecotourism, National Parks, Green current situation of protected areas, tourism activities, target groups, facilities and Marketing, Georgia. capacities. The research paper provides statistical information of tourism demand in protected areas, its use and abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Initial Environmental Examination Proposed Loan Georgia
    Draft Initial Environmental Examination Project Number: 52339-001 September 2020 Proposed Loan Georgia: Modern Skills for Better Jobs Sector Development Program Prepared by the Government of Georgia for the Asian Development Bank. This Draft Initial Environmental Examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 25 August 2020) Currency unit – lari (GEL) GEL1.00 = €0.27556 or $0.32483 $1.00 = GEL3.0785 or €0.84832 €1.00 = GEL3.62894 or $1.17880 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank ACM – asbestos-containing materials CBTE – competency based training and assessment COVID-19 – coronavirus disease CSOs – civil society organizations EAC – Environmental Assessment Code EIA – environmental impact assessment EHS – environmental, health and safety EMP – environmental management plan EMS – environmental management system GDP – gross domestic product GFP – grievance focal person GoG – Government of Georgia GRM – grievance redress mechanism GRCE – grievance redress committee GRCN – grievance redress commission
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregion Conservation Plan
    List of Contributors ARMENIA Seyed-Mohammadreza Fatemi, Islamic Azad University Aram Agasyan, Ministry of Nature Protection Mohammad Baqherzadeh-Karimi, Iranian Department Arthur Alaverdyan, State Forest Monitoring Centre of Environment Luba Balyan, Armenian Society of Protection of Birds NGO Mina Torki, Expert Tatyana Danielyan, Ministry of Nature Protection Asghar Mohammadi Fazel, Iranian Department Siranush Galstyan, WWF Armenia Branch of Environment Mamikon Ghasabyan, Institute of Zoology, Behzad Saeedpour, University of Environment National Academy of Sciences Hossein Mohammadi, Iranian Department of Environment Eleonora Grigoryan, Ministry of Nature Protection Mohammad S. Farhadinia, Iranian Cheetah Society Diana Harutyunyan, UNDP Armenia Ali Bali, Iranian Department of Environment Karen Jenderedjian, UNDP Armenia Mohammad Nosrati, Iranian Department of Environment Mark Kalashian, Institute of Zoology, Bagher Nezami, University of Environment /Iranian National Academy of Sciences Cheetah Society Nazik Khanjyan, Institute of Botany, Hadi Jafari, University of Environment National Academy of Sciences Mohammadreza Masoud, East Azerbaijan Society Igor Khorozyan, WWF Armenia Branch for Protection of Wildlife Karen Manvelyan, WWF Armenia Branch Alexander Malkhasyan, WWF Armenia Branch RUSSIA Siranush Muradyan, Ministry of Nature Protection Sergey Bukreev, A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology Aram Ter-Zakaryan, UNDP Armenia and Evolution Mikhail Voskanov, Ministry of Nature Protection Gadzhibek Dzhamirzoev, Federal State Institution «Daghestansky
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources of Georgia and Environmental Protection
    NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF GEORGIA NATURAL RESOURCES OF GEORGIA AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 2016 STATISTICAL PUBLICATION TBILISI 2017 STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2016 Statistical Publication Natural Resources of Georgia and Environmental Protection, 2016 Editor: Maia Guntsadze Vasil Tsakadze Persons responsible for the publication: Vasil Tsakadze Nino Kverghelidze Prepared by: Nino Kverghelidze © National Statistic Office of Georgia, 2017 30, Tsotne Dadiani Str., 0180, Tbilisi, Georgia Phone/Fax: (+995 32) 2 36 72 10 (500) E-mail: [email protected] Web page: http://www.geostat.ge STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2016 Foreword The present statistical publication, “Natural Resources of Georgia and Environmental Protection” provides information about use and protection of land, forest and water resources, protected areas, natural hazards and vio- lations of law related to environemtnal protection. It also presents some methodological explanations and infor- mation from different scientific sources. The data given in the publication reflect the main trends in the field of natural resources of Georgia and envi- ronmental protection activities in 1995-2016. Notation keys: ... No data - Event does not exist 0.0 Negligible magnitude The discrepancy between the totals and the sum in some cases can be explained by using rounded data. The data in this publication do not cover uccupied territories of Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali region. 1 | FOREWORD STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2016 Table of contents Geographic location and natural resources
    [Show full text]
  • 43405-013: Updated Environmental Assessment and Review Framework
    Updated Environmental Assessment and Review Framework ______________________________________________________________________________ Project Number: 43405 May 2015 GEO: Urban Services Improvement Investment Program Prepared by United Water Supply Company of Georgia LLC of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure for the Asian Development Bank. ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank AP - Affected Person CWRD - Central and West Asia Region Department DREP - Division of Resettlement and Environmental Protection EA - Executing Agency EARF - Environmental Assessment and Review Framework EEC - Environmental Expertise Conclusion EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment EIP - Environmental Impact Permit EMP - Environmental Management Plan GoG - Government of Georgia GRC - Grievance Redress Committee USIIP - Urban Sector Improvement Investment Program IA - Implementing Agency IEE - Initial Environmental Examination MDDP - Municipal Development and Decentralization Project MDF - Municipal Development Fund MFF - Multi-tranche Financing Facility MoENRP - Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection MoRDI - Ministry of Regional Development & Infrastructure NGO - Non-Governmental Organization OSPF - Office of the Special Project Facilitator OCRP - Office of the Compliance Review panel PIU - Project Implementation Unit IPMO - Investment Project Management Office REA - Rapid Environmental Assessment UWSCG - United Water Supply Company of Georgia NOTE In this report, “$” refers to US dollars. This resettlement framework is
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGIA Eco-Regional Nature Conservation Programme for the Southern Caucasus (ENCP), Phase III ANNEXES to the FINAL REPORT Cons
    GEORGIA Ministry of Environment Protection and Natural Resources (MEPNR) and German Financial Cooperation (KfW) Eco-regional Nature Conservation Programme for the Southern Caucasus (ENCP), Phase III ANNEXES TO THE FINAL REPORT Consulting Services for the Preparation of a Programme Based Thematic Approach January 2011 Deutsche Forstservice GmbH AGEG Consultants eG GEO - EP III Extension Study Final Report Annexes LIST OF ANNEXES Annex 1: Terms of reference for the study Annex 2: List of Georgia’s protected areas and their administrations Annex 3: List of relevant institutions and organisations with short descriptions Annex 4: Description of proposed programme areas Annex 5: Assessment of the Management Effectiveness of the Selected Areas Using Se- lected RAPPAM criteria Annex 6: Log frame matrix Annex 7: Cost and financing plan Annex 8: Implementation schedule Annex 9: Organisation diagram of PEA and PIA Annex 10: List of functions and tasks of the proposed PMU and indication of the needs for international consultants assistance Annex 11: Diagram of the implementation structure of the programme Annex 12: Project cycles for investment measures to be financed by the programme Annex 13: Tabular presentation of the programme Annex 14: List of persons and institutions contacted Annex 15: List of literature and documents with comments GEO - EP III Extension Study Final Report Annexes CONTACT PERSONS AND ADDRESSES For DFS Deutsche Forstservice GmbH Mr. Christian SCHADE Managing Director DFS Deutsche Forstservice GmbH Wittelsbacherstr. 11 85622 Feldkirchen Germany Phone: + 49 – (0)89 - 94 00 59 21 Fax: + 49 – (0)89 - 94 00 59 79 Email: [email protected] For AGEG Consultants eG Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources and Threats of the Eco-Tourism Development in Georgia
    American Journal of Environmental Protection 2015; 4(3-1): 180-185 Published online June 23, 2015 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ajep) doi: 10.11648/j.ajep.s.2015040301.38 ISSN: 2328-5680 (Print); ISSN: 2328-5699 (Online) Resources and Threats of the Eco-Tourism Development in Georgia Giorgi Khomeriki 1, Giorgi Meladze 2 1Vakhushti Bagrationi Institute of Geography at Iv.Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia 2Dep. of Geography, Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia Email address: [email protected] (G. Khomeriki), [email protected] (G. Meladze) To cite this article: Giorgi Khomeriki, Giorgi Meladze. Resources and Threats of the Eco-Tourism Development in Georgia. American Journal of Environmental Protection . Special Issue: Applied Ecology: Problems, Innovations. Vol. 4, No. 3-1, 2015, pp. 180-185. doi: 10.11648/j.ajep.s.2015040301.38 Abstract: Ecological tourism can play a certain role in solving the problems of environment protection and sustainable and safe development of the country. The article considers some specific problems of the eco-tourism development in Georgia. The results of the study of the tourism potential in the regions in 2009-2014 revealed that: Georgia has substantial means to develop eco-tourism. This is true not only for the protected areas, but also for individual natural and geographical areas of the different regions (historical areas) of the country. The distinctive feature of the country’s eco-tourism potential is particularly diversified relief forms and natural eco-systems, in particular, intense variation of the landscapes and great contrasts between them (seaside and mountain, humid subtropical and arid zone, river gorges and steppe landscapes alternate over small areas), widely distributed endemic biological species, and traditional ethnographic, farming and domestic cultural forms survived in the historical regions (mostly in the mountains) of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Financial Sustainability of the Protected Areas System in Georgia
    United Nations Development Programme Project Document Project title: Enhancing financial sustainability of the Protected Areas system in Georgia Country: Implementing Partner: Management Arrangements: Georgia Ministry of Environment Protection and National Implementation Modality Agriculture (MEPA)/ Agency of Protected (NIM) Areas (APA) UNPSD/Country Programme Outcome: By 2020, communities enjoy greater resilience through enhanced institutional and legislative systems for environment protection, sustainable management of natural resources and disaster risk reduction1. UNDP Strategic Plan Output: Output 2.4.1 Gender-responsive legal and regulatory frameworks, policies and institutions strengthened, and solutions adopted, to address conservation, sustainable use and equitable benefit sharing of natural resources , in line with international conventions and national legislation UNDP Social and Environmental Screening Category: UNDP Gender Marker: GEN2 Low Atlas Project ID (formerly Award ID): 00089759 Atlas Output ID (formerly Project ID): 00095873 UNDP-GEF PIMS ID number: 6138 GEF ID number: 9879 Planned start date: December 1, 2018 Planned end date: November 30, 2023 PAC meeting date: 22 November 2018 Brief project description: Georgia’s recent socio-economic transition was accompanied by unsustainable economic activities and over-use of biological resources, driven by poverty, lack of alternative livelihoods, irresponsible exploitation, ignorance on nature’s values, and ineffective legislation. Today, Georgia is one of the few countries globally where protected areas are a genuine high level national priority. Significant progress is made with the expansion of the PA network in the past decades, supported by legislative-institutional reforms, and the country is committed to increase the area under formal protection to 20% protection (from current 8%) in the next 8 years.
    [Show full text]
  • National Report COP12
    Page 1 of 29 2017 - NATIONAL REPORT OF PARTIES ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY SPECIES OF WILD ANIMALS [Party: Georgia] Page 2 of 29 2017 - NATIONAL REPORT OF PARTIES ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY SPECIES OF WILD ANIMALS [Party: Georgia] Page 3 of 29 2017 - NATIONAL REPORT OF PARTIES ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY SPECIES OF WILD ANIMALS [Party: Georgia] 2017 - NATIONAL REPORT OF PARTIES ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY SPECIES OF WILD ANIMALS The deadline for submission of the reports is 24 April 2017. The reporting period is from May 2014 to April 2017. Parties are encouraged to respond to all questions. Parties are also requested to provide comprehensive answers, including, where appropriate, a summary of activities, information on factors limiting action and details of any assistance required. The reporting format was agreed by the Standing Committee at its 40th Meeting (Bonn, November 2012) for mandatory use by Parties, for reports submitted to the Eleventh Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP11). The 45th meeting of the Standing Committee recommended the use of the same format for reports submitted to COP12, with necessary adjustments to take into account relevant COP11 decisions, in particular amendments to the Appendices and resolutions. COP Resolution 9.4 adopted at Rome called upon the Secretariats and Parties of CMS Agreements to collaborate in the implementation and harmonization of online reporting implementation. The CMS Family Online Reporting System (ORS) has been successfully implemented and used by AEWA in their last Meeting of the Parties (MOP 5, 2012) reporting cycle.
    [Show full text]