DOCSLIB.ORG

Deputy District Ranger Approval and Date

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Deputy District Ranger Approval and Date United States Department of Agriculture Environmental Forest Service Assessment July 2007 Thomas Mountain Fuels Reduction Project San Jacinto Ranger District, San Bernardino National Forest Riverside County, California For More Information Contact: Greg Casselberry Deputy District Ranger P.O. Box 518 Idyllwild, CA 92549 909/382-2600 x4116 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Environmental Assessment Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 - Purpose and Need for Action ....................................................................................... 3 Existing Conditions - Why Here and Now?................................................................................ 3 Public and Firefighter Health and Safety ................................................................................ 3 Forest Communities of Concern.............................................................................................. 6 Recreation................................................................................................................................ 9 Cultural Areas........................................................................................................................ 10 Desired Future Condition.......................................................................................................... 11 Proposed Action........................................................................................................................ 13 Decision Framework ................................................................................................................. 16 Adaptive Management........................................................................................................... 16 Relationship to Forest Plan.................................................................................................... 16 Public Involvement ................................................................................................................... 17 30-Day Comment Period....................................................................................................... 18 Issues ..................................................................................................................................... 18 Federal and State Permits, Licenses, and Certifications ........................................................... 19 Applicable Laws and Executive Orders ................................................................................ 20 Project Record Availability ................................................................................................... 20 Chapter 2 - Alternatives, Including the Proposed Action.............................................................. 21 Forest Plan Consistency ............................................................................................................ 21 Design Features ..................................................................................................................... 21 Monitoring............................................................................................................................. 21 Findings and Disclosures....................................................................................................... 22 Alternatives Considered but not Analyzed in Detail................................................................. 22 Diameter-Limit Alternative................................................................................................... 22 Prescribed Fire-Only Alternative .......................................................................................... 23 Alternatives Considered in Detail ............................................................................................. 24 Alternative 1 - No Action...................................................................................................... 24 Alternative 2 - Proposed Action............................................................................................ 24 Transportation System Needed to Implement Proposed Actions.......................................... 30 Comparison of Alternatives ......................................................................................................32 Chapter 3 - Environmental Consequences..................................................................................... 36 Analysis Documents Used For this Assessment ....................................................................... 36 Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Actions ................................................................. 36 Vegetation ................................................................................................................................. 38 Stand Exams and Analysis .................................................................................................... 38 Forest Structure ..................................................................................................................... 39 Tree Size/Species Composition/Density ............................................................................... 39 Resulting Changes from Historic Conditions........................................................................ 41 Desired Condition ..................................................................................................................... 42 Management of Density and Structure for Fire Resilient Conditions ................................... 42 Management of Density and Structure for Healthy/Sustainable Forest Conditions.............. 46 Existing or Baseline/Reference Conditions .............................................................................. 48 Environmental Consequences to Vegetation............................................................................. 50 Alternative 1 - No Action...................................................................................................... 50 Alternative 2 - Proposed Action............................................................................................ 56 Vegetation Project Monitoring.................................................................................................. 63 Environmental Consequences to Fire and Fuel Conditions ...................................................... 64 i Thomas Mountain Fuels Reduction Project Alternative 1 - No Action...................................................................................................... 64 Alternative 2 - Proposed Action............................................................................................ 65 Environmental Consequences to Wildlife................................................................................. 70 Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Species .................................................................... 71 Management Indicator Species.............................................................................................. 86 Migratory Birds ..................................................................................................................... 87 Range..................................................................................................................................... 88 Wildlife Project Monitoring .................................................................................................. 89 Environmental Consequences to Botany .................................................................................. 89 Noxious Weeds...................................................................................................................... 89 Botany Management Indicator Species ................................................................................. 93 Botany Threatened and Endangered Species......................................................................... 94 Botany Sensitive, Watch-list, and Proposed San Bernardino National Forest Sensitive Plant Species................................................................................................................................... 95 Botany Project Monitoring.................................................................................................... 95 Environmental Consequences to Watershed............................................................................. 97 Alternative 1 - No Action.....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jeremy Langley Chief Operations Officer Wilhite Langley, Inc. 21800 Barton Road, Ste 102 Grand Terrace, Ca 92313
    47 1st Street, Suite 1 Redlands, CA 92373-4601 (909) 915-5900 May 22, 2019 Jeremy Langley Chief Operations Officer Wilhite Langley, Inc. 21800 Barton Road, Ste 102 Grand Terrace, Ca 92313 RE: Biological Resources Assessment, Jurisdictional Waters Delineation Glen Helen/Devore parcel - APN: 0261-161-17, Devore, CA Dear Mr. Langley: Jericho Systems, Inc. (Jericho) is pleased to provide this letter report that details the results of a general Biological Resources Assessment (BRA) that includes habitat suitability assessments for nesting birds, Burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) [BUOW] and a Jurisdictional Waters Delineation (JD) for the proposed Glen Helen/Devore parcel (Project) located within Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) #0261-161-17 in the community of Devore, CA (Attachment B: Figures 1 and 2). This report is designed to address potential effects of the proposed Project to designated Critical Habitats and/or any species currently listed or formally proposed for listing as endangered or threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the California Endangered Species Act (CESA), or species designated as sensitive by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), or the California Native Plant Society (CNPS). Attention was focused on sensitive species known to occur locally. This report also addresses resources protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, federal Clean Water Act (CWA) regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) respectively; and Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code (FCG) administered by the CDFW. SITE LOCATION The approximately 1-acre parcel (APN: 0261-161-17) is located north of Kendall Drive just north of the intersection with N.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Determining Significance and Report Format and Content Requirements
    COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING SIGNIFICANCE AND REPORT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENT GROUP Department of Planning and Land Use Department of Public Works Fourth Revision September 15, 2010 APPROVAL I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources, Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources, and Report Format and Content Requirements for Resource Management Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group's Guidelines for Determining Significance and Technical Report Format and Content Requirements and were considered by the Director of Planning and Land Use, in coordination with the Director of Public Works on September 15, 2O1O. ERIC GIBSON Director of Planning and Land Use SNYDER I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources, Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources, and Report Format and Content Requirements for Resource Management Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group's Guidelines for Determining Significance and Technical Report Format and Content Requirements and have hereby been approved by the Deputy Chief Administrative Officer (DCAO) of the Land Use and Environment Group on the fifteenth day of September, 2010. The Director of Planning and Land Use is authorized to approve revisions to these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources and Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources and Resource Management Plans except any revisions to the Guidelines for Determining Significance presented in Section 4.0 must be approved by the Deputy CAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resource Investigation in Support of the Bloomington Gas Station Project, San Bernardino County, California
    Cultural Resource Investigation in Support of the Bloomington Gas Station Project, San Bernardino County, California Submitted to: The Altum Group 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Ste. 219 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Technical Report 20-052 February 20, 2020 626.408.8006 | paleowest.com | 517 S. Ivy Avenue | Monrovia, CA 91016 CULTURAL RESOURCE INVESTIGATION IN SUPPORT OF THE BLOOMINGTON GAS STATION PROJECT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared by: Roberta Thomas, M.A., RPA Prepared for: The Altum Group Technical Report No. 20-052 PaleoWest Archaeology 517 S. Ivy Avenue Monrovia, California 91016 (626) 408-8006 February 20, 2020 Keywords: CEQA; Bloomington; San Bernardino County Bloomington Gas Station | i CONTENTS MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ......................................................................................................III 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ..................................................... 1 1.2 REPORT ORGANIZATION ............................................................................... 1 2.0 REGULATORY CONTEXT ........................................................................................ 4 2.1 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ............................................. 4 2.2 CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY BILL 52 ................................................................... 4 3.0 SETTING ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Biodiversity Report
    FINAL Baseline Biodiversity Survey for Potrero Mason Property Prepared for: County of San Diego Department of Parks and Recreation 5500 Overland Avenue Drive, Suite 410 San Diego, California 92123 Contact: Jennifer Price Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 Contact: Brock Ortega DECEMBER 2012 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Final Baseline Biodiversity Survey Potrero Mason Property TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................ V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................VII 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose of the Report.............................................................................................. 1 1.2 MSCP Context ........................................................................................................ 1 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ...........................................................................................9 2.1 Project Location ...................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Geographical Setting ............................................................................................... 9 2.3 Geology and Soils ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Biological Assessment, Special Status Botanical Survey
    PRELIMINARY BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, SPECIAL STATUS BOTANICAL SURVEY, AND BREEDING SEASON BURROWING OWL SURVEY FOR THE SLOVER AND CACTUS WAREHOUSE PROJECT, BLOOMINGTON AREA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ±13.34 Acre Property, ±13.34 Acres Surveyed APNs 0257-071-03, -04, and -39, Bloomington Area, Section 27, Township 1 South, Range 5 West, USGS Fontana 7.5’ Topographic Quadrangle Map Prepared For: Clark Neuhoff Alere Property Group 100 Byview Circle, No. 310 Newport Beach, CA 92660 [email protected] Prepared By: Leslie Irish, Principal [email protected] Guy Bruyea, Biological Investigator [email protected] Carla Wakeman, Senior Biologist [email protected] Jeffrey Sonnentag, Technical Editor [email protected] Vegetation onsite is disturbed and developed/ornamental. No native habitat is present. There are no jurisdictional waters or wetlands. No special status plant species have been detected during surveys to date. Botanical surveys will continue through the flowering season in 2018. One (1) special status wildlife species, California horned lark, was observed foraging onsite. One (1) other special status wildlife species, loggerhead shrike, has moderate potential for occurrence, but has not been observed. No evidence of current burrowing owl occupation has been found on the project site to date; however, suitable mammal burrows were observed. Focused burrowing owl surveys will continue through the breeding season in 2018. No suitable habitat for Delhi sands flower-loving fly is present on the project site and no surveys for this species are recommended. Trees, vegetation, and structures suitable for nesting birds are present within and around the site. Recommended mitigation measures include a pre-construction burrowing owl clearance survey and pre-construction nesting bird survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Assessment, Special Status Botanical Survey, and Breeding Season Burrowing Owl Survey for the Slover and Cactus Ware
    BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, SPECIAL STATUS BOTANICAL SURVEY, AND BREEDING SEASON BURROWING OWL SURVEY FOR THE SLOVER AND CACTUS WAREHOUSE PROJECT, BLOOMINGTON AREA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ±13.34 Acre Property, ±13.34 Acres Surveyed APNs 0257-071-03, -04, and -39, Bloomington Area, Section 27, Township 1 South, Range 5 West, USGS Fontana 7.5’ Topographic Quadrangle Map Prepared For: Clark Neuhoff Alere Property Group 100 Byview Circle, No. 310 Newport Beach, CA 92660 [email protected] Prepared By: Leslie Irish, Principal [email protected] Guy Bruyea, Biological Investigator [email protected] Carla Wakeman, Senior Biologist [email protected] Jeffrey Sonnentag, Technical Editor [email protected] Vegetation onsite is disturbed and developed/ornamental. No native habitat is present. There are no jurisdictional waters or wetlands. No special status plant species were detected. One (1) special status wildlife species, California horned lark, was observed foraging onsite. One (1) other special status wildlife species, loggerhead shrike, has moderate potential for occurrence, but has not been observed. No evidence of current burrowing owl occupation has been found on the project site; however, suitable mammal burrows were observed. No suitable habitat for Delhi sands flower-loving fly is present on the project site and no surveys for this species are recommended. Trees, vegetation, and structures suitable for nesting birds are present within and around the site. Recommended mitigation measures include a pre-construction
    [Show full text]
  • The Development and Improvement of Instructions
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Texas A&M Repository MOLECULAR AND GENETIC ANALYSIS OF ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION IN THE RARE SERPENTINE ENDEMIC, CAULANTHUS AMPLEXICAULIS VAR. BARBARAE (J. HOWELL) MUNZ A Dissertation by ANNA MILDRED BURRELL Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 1 1 August 2010 Major Subject: Botany 2 2 Molecular and Genetic Analysis of Adaptive Evolution in the Rare Serpentine Endemic, Caulanthus amplexicaulis var. barbarae (J. Howell) Munz Copyright 2010 Anna Mildred Burrell MOLECULAR AND GENETIC ANALYSIS OF ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION IN THE RARE SERPENTINE ENDEMIC, CAULANTHUS AMPLEXICAULIS VAR. BARBARE (J. HOWELL) MUNZ A Dissertation by ANNA MILDRED BURRELL Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Alan E. Pepper 3 Committee Members, David H. Byrne 3 Kendal D. Hirschi James R. Manhart Head of Department, U.J. McMahan August 2010 Major Subject: Botany iii ABSTRACT Molecular and Genetic Analysis of Adaptive Evolution in the Rare Serpentine Endemic, Caulanthus amplexicaulis var. barbarae (J Howell) Munz. (August 2010) Anna Mildred Burrell, B.A., Duke University; M.S., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Alan E. Pepper In the interest of understanding the genetic basis of adaption to environment, we developed F2 lines from an F1 interspecific cross between the rare serpentine endemic, Caulanthus amplexicaulis var.
    [Show full text]
  • The 31St Annual Wildflower Hotline Brought to You by the Theodore
    Welcome to the 31st Annual Wildflower Hotline brought to you by the Theodore Payne Foundation, a non-profit plant nursery, seed source, book store and education center dedicated to the preservation of wildflowers and California native plants. This a report for May 31, 2013—the last report of the season. Look for new reports starting up in March 2014. Meanwhile, keep your fingers crossed for rain and favorable temperatures for wildflower germination. A segment of the Pacific Crest Trail in the San Gabriel Mountains from Little Rock Creek Road to Three Points has a great diversity of flowering plants awaiting exploration by plant enthusiasts. Because of the dry year, the total number of these plants is low but the diversity is splendid. The winner of the sweetest little flower is the three lobe oxytheca (Sidotheca trilobata). You will see both a red paintbrush (Castilleja applegatei ssp. martinii) and a yellow paintbrush (C. plagiotoma) coloring the landscape. Challenge yourself to find everything on this checklist! There are blazing stars (Mentzelia congesta), splendid gilia, (Saltugilia splendens ssp. splendens), silver puffs (Uropappus lindleyi), scalebud (Anisocoma aculis), Mojave linanthus (Linanthus breviculus), santolina pincushion (Chaenactis santolinoides), rock buchwheat (Eriogonum saxatile), Fremont’s pincushion (Phacelia fremontii), chia (Salvia columbariae), oak violet (Viola purpurea var. quercetorum), canyon dudleya (Dudleya cymosa ssp. pumila) wallflower (Erysimum capitatum), common muilla (Muilla maritima), diamond-petaled clarkia (Clarkia rhomboidea), whispering bells, (Emmenanthe penduliflora), yellow pincushion (Chaenactis glabriuscula), white tidy tips (Layia glandulosa), ground smoke (Gayophytum diffusum), Mt. prickly phlox (Linanthus pungens), Davidson’s phacelia (Phacelia davidsonii) red-stem and narrow leaf miner’s lettuce (Claytonia parvifolia and C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development and Improvement Of
    MOLECULAR AND GENETIC ANALYSIS OF ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION IN THE RARE SERPENTINE ENDEMIC, CAULANTHUS AMPLEXICAULIS VAR. BARBARAE (J. HOWELL) MUNZ A Dissertation by ANNA MILDRED BURRELL Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 1 1 August 2010 Major Subject: Botany 2 2 Molecular and Genetic Analysis of Adaptive Evolution in the Rare Serpentine Endemic, Caulanthus amplexicaulis var. barbarae (J. Howell) Munz Copyright 2010 Anna Mildred Burrell MOLECULAR AND GENETIC ANALYSIS OF ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION IN THE RARE SERPENTINE ENDEMIC, CAULANTHUS AMPLEXICAULIS VAR. BARBARE (J. HOWELL) MUNZ A Dissertation by ANNA MILDRED BURRELL Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Alan E. Pepper 3 Committee Members, David H. Byrne 3 Kendal D. Hirschi James R. Manhart Head of Department, U.J. McMahan August 2010 Major Subject: Botany iii ABSTRACT Molecular and Genetic Analysis of Adaptive Evolution in the Rare Serpentine Endemic, Caulanthus amplexicaulis var. barbarae (J Howell) Munz. (August 2010) Anna Mildred Burrell, B.A., Duke University; M.S., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Alan E. Pepper In the interest of understanding the genetic basis of adaption to environment, we developed F2 lines from an F1 interspecific cross between the rare serpentine endemic, Caulanthus amplexicaulis var. barbarae and the non-serpentine Caulanthus amplexicaulis var. amplexicaulis. Using genomic DNA from Caulanthus amplexicaulis var. barbarae, we developed a suite of microsatellite markers.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Technical Report
    Biological Resources Technical Report Colton Community Soccer Park Project in Colton, San Bernardino County, California Prepared for City of Colton Community Services and Public Works Department 670 Colton Avenue Colton, California 92324 Contact: Deb Farrar Prepared by Psomas 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 200 Santa Ana, California 92707 Contact: Steve Norton July 2019 Colton Soccer Park Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Location and Physical Environmental Setting ........................................... 1 1.1.1 Regional Environmental Setting ................................................................ 1 1.2 Project Description and Background ..................................................................... 1 1.3 Regulatory Setting ................................................................................................. 2 1.3.1 Federal ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3.2 State .......................................................................................................... 4 1.3.3 Regional .................................................................................................... 7 2.0 Survey Methods .............................................................................................................. 9 2.1 Literature Review .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition
    cHeckliSt of tHe vaScUlaR PlaNtS of SaN DieGo coUNty 5th edition Pinus torreyana subsp. torreyana Downingia concolor var. brevior Thermopsis californica var. semota Pogogyne abramsii Hulsea californica Cylindropuntia fosbergii Dudleya brevifolia Chorizanthe orcuttiana Astragalus deanei by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University examples of checklist taxa: SPecieS SPecieS iNfRaSPecieS iNfRaSPecieS NaMe aUtHoR RaNk & NaMe aUtHoR Eriodictyon trichocalyx A. Heller var. lanatum (Brand) Jepson {SD 135251} [E. t. subsp. l. (Brand) Munz] Hairy yerba Santa SyNoNyM SyMBol foR NoN-NATIVE, NATURaliZeD PlaNt *Erodium cicutarium (L.) Aiton {SD 122398} red-Stem Filaree/StorkSbill HeRBaRiUM SPeciMeN coMMoN DocUMeNTATION NaMe SyMBol foR PlaNt Not liSteD iN THE JEPSON MANUAL †Rhus aromatica Aiton var. simplicifolia (Greene) Conquist {SD 118139} Single-leaF SkunkbruSH SyMBol foR StRict eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §§Dudleya brevifolia (Moran) Moran {SD 130030} SHort-leaF dudleya [D. blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran subsp. brevifolia Moran] 1B.1 S1.1 G2t1 ce SyMBol foR NeaR eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §Nolina interrata Gentry {SD 79876} deHeSa nolina 1B.1 S2 G2 ce eNviRoNMeNTAL liStiNG SyMBol foR MiSiDeNtifieD PlaNt, Not occURRiNG iN coUNty (Note: this symbol used in appendix 1 only.) ?Cirsium brevistylum Cronq. indian tHiStle i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramona Band of Cahuilla’S Comments
    RAMONA BAND OF CAHUILLA’S COMMENTS REGARDING POTENTIAL REVISIONS TO THE TRUST ACQUISITION REGULATIONS AT 25 C.F.R. PART 151 DUE DATE: JUNE 30, 2018 TO [email protected] The Ramona Band of Cahuilla (“Ramona Band”), a federally recognized Indian tribe located in Riverside County, California, submits the following comments in response to the Department of the Interior’s (“Department”) December 6, 2017 Dear Tribal Leader Letter (“DTLL”) proposing a broader discussion on the direction of updates to Part 151. In general, the Ramona Band opposes any changes that would: increase burdens on applicants, including the increase of time it takes to process an application; authorize increased deference to state and local governments during the application process; invite challenges to a final determination; diminish the Secretary’s authority or responsibility to take land into trust for Indians; or otherwise frustrate the land into trust process. The Ramona Band appreciates the Department’s broadened consultation on the off-reservation fee to trust process, including its willingness to withdraw its Consultation Draft included in its now-withdrawn October 4, 2017 Dear Tribal Leader Letter. However, we suggest that the Department formally withdraw its efforts in this area, given the overwhelming opposition expressed by tribes during consultations. In the alternative, we strongly suggest that this regulatory review be suspended until the Senate confirms a new Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs (AS-IA), and the new AS-IA has had an opportunity to meet with tribes. This is particularly important since any efforts to revise such an important tool for tribal governments should be developed with full participation by the Senate confirmed AS-IA, and only after much discussion and feedback from tribes.
    [Show full text]