Upline® New Products 1998
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Journal of Borderland Research V28 N6 Nov-Dec 1971
• i VOLUME XXVIII, No, 6 Round Robin NOV-DEC 1972 K-vrS ~i<e deufnai < © i ep g O e sr 0 ¿n n g O eseare TABLE OF CONTENTS WAS MOSES THE SON OF AN EGYPTIAN HIGH PRIEST? By Louis Jacolliot, BEGINNERS' RESCUE GROUP By Dyanene Carmen. ........... 3 - 9 LIMITS TO GROWTH By Les White WHAT SAYS THE INNER CIRCLE? By Kay Ting............... 10 - 12 THE KINSHIP OF RELIGION AND SCIENCE Part II, by Robert W. Wilson . 14 - 15 HEALING THE BODY TEMPLE By Dr. X ......................... 16 - 19 INSPIRED BY THE DARK FORCES, PART XI CQC by the Editor................. 20 - 21 CLIPS, QUOTES & COMMENTS Christmas Message From Ashtar, Christmas Message From St. Francis de Sales, Dero Queero Business, Black Magician in a White Skin, A BSRAssociate H/ s Her Eyes Opened, The United Nations Association, Free Mind-Control Teaching, Mind Dynamics Shocked But Happy, Keep After Those "Eating Companions", Psalm 51:7, Another Approach From Yoga, The Auto matic Nervous System Society, Light On Noah's Ark?, Into The Fourth Dimension, American Made UFOs, Agreement With The Conmunists, And With The Cath olics, Celebration of the Eucharist. 22 - 36 THE JOURNAL OF BORDERLAND RESEARCH BSRF No. 1 Published by Borderland Sciences Research Foundation, Inc., PO Box 548, Vista, California 92083, U.S.A. Edited by the Director, Riley Hansard Crabb, Doctor of Metaphysics in the Society of St. Luke the Physician. The Journal is published six issues a year with the assistance of the Associates, at the Director's home, 1103 Bobolink Drive, Vista. It is printed, 36 pages an issue. -
A Study on Direct Selling Through Multi Level Marketing
International Journal of Advancements in Research & Technology, Volume 1, Issue 4, September-2012 1 ISSN 2278-7763 A Study On Direct Selling Through Multi Level Marketing F. MARY MERLIN Department of Management Studies, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli, India. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Direct selling is a multi-level marketing in which the sales force is compensated not only for the sales they make but also for the sales done through their recruit. This recruited sales force is referred to as the participants who can provide multiple levels of compensation. A person's job would be to recruit others to sell their product, and in return, receive a percentage of their sales. The next person's job then is to recruit people even more so below them, and receive a percentage of their sales. Other terms for Multi-level marketing include network marketing and referral marketing. Commonly, the salespeople are expected to sell products directly to consumers by means of relationship through referrals marketing. Some people use direct selling as a synonym for MLM, although MLM is only one type of direct selling Keywords : Multi-Level Marketing, Direct Selling, Traditional Marketing. 1 INTRODUCTION evolution of direct selling. According to Biggart, direct selling has grown to become a major form of commercial activity in Direct selling is marketing and transaction of consumer goods the US, despite encountering opposition from other sectors of directly to the consumer; it does not depend on direct mail, the business community during various stages in its product advertising or fixed retail outlets. Self-governing sales development. -
5M1b Ltr to FTC Re MLM Income and Health Claims FINAL
June 30, 2021 VIA EMAIL Samuel Levine Acting Director, Bureau of Consumer Protection Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W. Washington, D.C. 20580 [email protected] Dear Mr. Levine: For far too long multilevel marketing (MLM) companies have used deceptive marketing to promote the business opportunity and sell their wares.1 In fact, the problem is so longstanding and pervasive that the MLM industry’s self-regulatory body, the Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC), stated just last month that: Though the industry has made significant strides to curtail the dissemination of unsupported claims regarding income potential …, there is still a great deal of work ahead of us to assure that the product and earnings claims communicated to consumers and potential salesforce members are truthful and accurate.2 Moreover, industry trade group, the Direct Selling Association (DSA), published an article in its January 2021 journal that stated, “[d]irect sellers will never be able to wholly prevent distributors from making improper claims.”3 Such pessimism is cause for concern as improper health and income claims not only deceive consumers but also lead to social, emotional, and physical harms, and financial hardship.4 Given this backdrop, TINA.org urges the Commission to implement a penalty offense program targeting the direct selling industry and its market-wide practice of utilizing deceptive earnings representations and false health claims.5 For more than 40 years, the FTC has consistently pursued individual MLM companies making -
The Pyramid Scheme Industry
THE PYRAMID SCHEME INDUSTRY: Examining Some Legal and Economic Aspects of Multi-Level Marketing Douglas M. Brooks Robert L. Fitzpatrick Bruce Craig The announcement on March 12, 2014, that Herbalife Ltd. (NYSE: HLF) had received a Civil Investigative Demand from the Federal Trade Commission caps a twenty-two month period during which persistent questions have been raised concerning the purported business opportunity known as multi-level marketing (MLM). While much of the financial media has recently been focused on the Herbalife story, the problems with MLM are not new, and they are not limited to Herbalife. As we explain in this paper, there are fundamental problems at the core of the MLM business model, and with the efforts of the FTC to regulate the MLM “industry.” The authors of this paper are all members of an international coalition of consumer advocates which, on October 24, 2013, filed a formal petition with the FTC requesting that it investigate the MLM industry and promulgate regulations to protect consumers from unfair and deceptive MLM business opportunities.1 This paper is intended to build on the Petition and to assist legislators, regulators and interested persons to understand the MLM industry and the need for further action. Why all the fuss over MLM? Why are Wall Street billionaires fighting very public battles over MLM? Is MLM merely a form of direct, person-to-person selling in which independent distributors can earn money both by selling products directly to consumers or by 1 See http://pyramidschemealert.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Petition-of-Ad-Hoc- -
Here's the Rest of Him, by Kent Steffgen Who Reveals the Real Ronald Reagan
You've Read Where's The Rest of Me? Now Read -JE"E " THE RES OF I Il~i lf~ The Story of Ronald Reagan, Acting Governor, During The All-Important First Legislative Year BY KENT STEFFGEN HERE'S THE REST OF HIM Kent N' . Stettoen FORSIGHT BOOKS Reno, Nevada HERE'S THE REST OF HIM v 1968 by Forsight Books P . 0 . Box 673 Reno, Nevada 89504 First printing, April, 1968 All rights reserved Printed in United States of America Good-by GOP TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 . Enter Outward 1 2 . Save by Spending 8 3. The Largest Tax Increase In The History of All The States Of The Union 22 4. Open Housing 30 5. The Educational Bureaucracy 39 6. Medicare 53 7. Gun Ownership 60 8. The Property Tax Game 68 9. Revision of State Constitution 74 10 . Appointments-Part I 83 11 . Appointments-Part II 96 12 . The Raid 114 13 . Ronald Reagan 129 14 . Nineteen Sixty Eight 154 Appendix : Ronald Reagan, Syndicate or Non-Syndicate? INTRODUCTION Several things prompted this report . Among them : deep re- sentment in California's Republican Party since Ronald Reagan entered office ; unprecedented national publicity favoring a conservative candidate ; a "Cloud 9" Republican posture going into a presidential year-the most serious of all national events short of war . Republicans are not merely overlooking significant things about Ronald Reagan ; this year, they are inclined to reject even the normal run of inquiry . And finally, the United States has no record of Ronald Reagan's perform- ance in office and the demand has been growing since Novem- ber of 1966 . -
From the Co-Chairs
Society of American Archivists Lesbian and Gay Archivists Roundtable Newsletter Number 34, Fall 2008 In this issue: From the Co-Chairs 1 Editor’s note 2 LAGAR Announcements 3 SAA Announcements 5 Archive news & announcements 6 Making History 8 News bits and bites 21 International news 22 Call for papers / proposals 24 Research opportunity 25 Scholarships 25 Upcoming conferences 26 Something completely different 27 [Our very own Jim C and his (then) soon-to-be husband Wally marry in San Francisco at SAA.] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ From the Co-chairs: The annual meeting has been well documented in the annual report, which appears elsewhere in this newsletter. We had a good time at the GLBT Historical Society in San Francisco socializing as well as touring the facilities. During October, the Steering Committee and we co-chairs discussed the two proposals which came to us for our endorsement: “Sleeping with the Enemy: Hate Collections in Catholic, Masonic, and LGBTQ Repositories,” and “Survey Says . : Motivations, Methodologies and Findings from Four Archival Repository Surveys.” Both proposals actively involve archivists from LGBT repositories, and we endorsed both of them; whether they will be accepted or not, time will show. Austin is a mere nine months away. Of note, SAA web site is now encouraging us to make our reservations at the hotel. What will perhaps surprise you more is our announcement now that it is time to begin putting together a proposal for Washington, D.C. for 2010. What?! If we begin now, we can have the proposals ready to wrap up by the annual meeting in Austin, rather than just beginning work on them. -
Defense of the Pyramid Scheme
In Defense of the Pyramid Scheme Dr. Lasdwun N. Luzes In Defense of the Pyramid Scheme by Dr. Lasdwun N. Luzes “Alas what dealer in the world would ever get a farthing, if he be so wise as to scruple at perjury, blush at a lie, or stick at any fraud and over-reaching.” Erasmus of Rotterdam, 1511, “In Praise of Folly” © copyright 2014, by Dr. Lasdwun N. Luzes Boca Raton Florida, Ada Michigan, Salt Lake City Utah, Cayman Islands, Shanghai China E-mail: [email protected] Trademarks: Various names used in this document are the trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies Credits: Direct Selling Association for the fantastic research and inventive analysis on which some of the essay is based. Cover: The Pyramid image and words that appear on the reverse of the Great Seal of the United States. Annuit Coeptis, “Providence Approves” and Novus Ordo Seclorum, “A New Order of the Ages”, signify the new economic order of the Pyramid Scheme Business Model, which has manifestly been approved by the Invisible Hand of Providence, The Market. Outline: I. Pyramid Schemes in Everyday Life II. MLM: Made in America III. Pyramid vs. Business, a Distinction without a Difference IV. Ubiquitous, Invisible and Inexplicable V. Capitalism, Pure and Unfettered VI. The Obsolescence of the Fraud Thesis VII. Protectors of the Pyramids VIII. The Pyramid as Main Street Business IX. A Business, Legal or Not X. The Perfect Business Model XI. The Fraud Question for the Last Time About the Author In Defense of the Pyramid Scheme I. Pyramid Schemes in Everyday Life Throughout the year of 2013, writers at Fortune, CNBC, Bloomberg, Wall Street Journal, New York Times and a host of local newspapers and television news programs have all shown a new and intense interest in the question of whether or not Herbalife is a pyramid scheme. -
Regional Oral History Office the Bancroft Library University Of
Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California Government History Documentation Project Ronald Reagan Gubernatorial Era GOVERNOR REAGAN AND HIS CABINET: AN INTRODUCTION Gordon Luce A Banker's View of State Administration and Republican Politics Verne Orr Business Leadership in the Department of Motor Vehicles and State Finance Ronald Reagan On Becoming Governor Interviews Conducted by Gabrielle Morris and Sarah Sharp 1979 - 1983 Copyright @ 1986 by the Regents of the University of California This manuscript is made available for research purposes. No part of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of the Director of The Bancroft Library of the University of California at Berkeley. Requests for permission to quote for publication should be addressed to the Regional Oral History Office, 486 Library, and should include identification of the specific passages to be quoted, anticipated use of the passages, and identification of the user. It is recommended that this oral history be cited as follows: To cite the volume: Governor Reagan.and His Cabinet: An Introduction, an oral history conducted 1979-1983, Regional Oral History Office, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley, 1986. To cite individual interview: Gordon Luce, "A Banker's View of State Administration and Republican Politics," an oral history conducted by Gabrielle Morris and Sarah Sharp in 1981 and 1983 in Governor Reagan and His Cabinet: -An Introduction, Regional Oral History Office, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley, 1986. Copy No. PREFACE California government and politics from 1966 through 1974 are the focus of the Reagan Gubernatorial Era Series of the state Government History Documenta- tion Project, conducted by the Regional Oral History Office of The Bancroft Library with the participation of the oral history programs at the Davis and Los Angeles campuses of the University of California, Claremont Graduate School, and California State University at Fullerton. -
An Analysis of the Campaign to Recall Idaho Senator Frank Church Redacted for Privacy Abstract Approved: Mark Moore
AN ABSTRACT CF THE THESIS OF Cheri L. Andrews for the degree of Master of Arts in speech communication, political science, and speech communication presented on May 5,1992. Title: The Victory in Vietnam Committee's Manichean Rhetoric: An Analysis of the Campaign to Recall Idaho Senator Frank Church Redacted for Privacy Abstract Approved: Mark Moore The purpose of this study is to illuminate the role, the function, and the ironic outcome of the Victory in Vietnam Committee's campaign pamphlet to recall Senator F-ank Church of Idaho in 1967. The VVC's political strategy was to build credibility with the media through the recall pamphlet. The analysis of the recall pamphlet shows the failure of the Victory in Vietnam Committee to adapt to the intended audience, the media. The pamphlet is further evaluated in the context of manichean rhetoric to highlight the unethical use of credibility building techniques and the ultimate goal of the VVC to stifle Church's dissent with respect to the Vietnam War. The irony of the Victory in Vietnam Committee's explanatory pamphlet is that instead of helping to oust Church by exposing his faults, it caused the downfall of the Victory in Vietnam Committee. The Victory in Vietnam Committee's Manichean Rhetoric: An Analysis of the Campaign to Recall Idaho Senator Frank Church by Cheri L. Andrews A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies Completed May 5,1992 Commencement June 1992 APPROVED: Redacted for Privacy Dr. Mark Moore Assistant Professor of ,breech Communication in charge of major Redacted for Privacy Dr. -
AMWAY CORPORATION, Lng, ET AL
118 .I.cUJ.il... Complaint 93 F. IN THE MATTER OF AMWAY CORPORATION, lNG, ET AL. FINAL ORDER, OPINION. ETC. , IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 902:/. Complaint, March 25, 1975 - Final Order, May 8, 1979 This order, among other things, requires two Michigan corporations engaged in the door- door marketing of various household products, and two corporate officers, to cease allocating customers among their distributors; fixing wholesale and retail prices for their products; taking retaliatory action against recalcitrants; and disseminating price-Hsting data which fail to advise that price adherence is not obligatory. Respondents are additionally prohibit- ed from misrepresenting potential earnings and other relevants to prospective distributors. Appearances For the Commission: Joseph S. Brownman, D. Stuart Cameron Mary Lou Steptoe, B. Milele Archibald and Michael Goldenberg. For the respondents: Lee Loevinger, Philip Larson and Robert J Kenney, Jr., Hogan Hartson Washington , D.C. and John E Stephen, Ada, Mich. COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U. C. 41 et seq. and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act, the Federal Trade Commission having reason t" believe that the parties listed in the caption hereof and more particularly described and referred to hereinafter as resp"ndents, have violated the provisions of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the interest of the public, hereby issues its complaint, stating its charges as follows: PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent Amway Corporation, Inc. -
1 Regulating Direct Sales at the Edges of Labor And
THE PYRAMID PROBLEM: REGULATING DIRECT SALES AT THE EDGES OF LABOR AND CONSUMPTION, 1972–1982 JESSICA BURCH UNIVERSITY OF UTAH On September 28, 1972 Walter Mondale stood before the U.S. Senate and declared the pyramid sales plan “the ‘consumer fraud problem of the 1970s.’”1 The Democratic Senator from Minnesota claimed the U.S. was “in the midst of an epidemic of vicious chain selling enterprises, which [have] taken over $300 million in investment money from the American public.” Pyramid sales organizations, according to Mondale, practiced: A wide variety of deceptive, high-pressure sales techniques . to recruit new investors, including the planting of shills in the audience, who prominently display wads of large bills and promise the potential investor that the road to easy riches is at hand . with the result that the potential investors cannot make a rational choice.2 Americans across the country had fallen victim to schemes purporting to sell burglar alarms and long-distance calling cards, lease payphone booths, peddle membership in discount travel and purchasing clubs, and market various (often non-existent) consumer products. According to one estimate, American investors lost more than $1 billion to Ponzi and pyramid schemes in 1976 alone.3 The U.S. already had some state-level regulations in place to police Ponzi schemes. As in Charles Ponzi’s plan to invest in international stamps in the 1920s, a Ponzi scheme recruited individuals to “invest” in an organization or security with the promise of unusually high interest, sometimes upwards of 100%. Early entrants into the scheme received the promised return, which 1 Walter Mondale quoted in Congressional Record: Proceedings and Debates of the 92nd Congress, Second Session. -
In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ————————————————————— JUAN RAMON TORRES; EUGENE ROBISON
Case: 14-20128 Document: 00512821163 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/30/2014 No. 14-20128 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ————————————————————— JUAN RAMON TORRES; EUGENE ROBISON, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SGE MANAGEMENT, LLC; STREAM GAS & ELECTRIC, LTD.; STREAM SPE GP, LLC; STREAM SPE, LTD; IGNITE HOLDINGS, LTD; ET AL., Defendants-Appellants. ————————————————————— On Petition for Review from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, Case No. 4:09-CV-02056 ————————————————————— REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANTS ————————————————————— Michael K. Hurst James C. Ho John F. Guild Robert C. Walters GRUBER HURST JOHANSEN HAIL Prerak Shah SHANK LLP GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500 2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1100 Dallas, Texas 75202 Dallas, Texas 75201-6912 Telephone: (214) 855-6800 Telephone: (214) 698-3100 Facsimile: (214) 855-6808 Facsimile: (214) 571-2934 Vanessa J. Rush STREAM ENERGY 1950 Stemmons Freeway, Suite 3000 Dallas, Texas 75207 Telephone: (214) 800-4464 Facsimile: (214) 560-1354 COUNSEL FOR APPELLANTS Case: 14-20128 Document: 00512821163 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/30/2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Authorities .................................................................................................. ii Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 Argument..................................................................................................................