<<

F EATURE Kavli IPMU Associate Professor Yukinobu Toda Research Area:Mathematics Minimal Model Theory, Derived Categories of Coherent Sheaves, and Mirror Symmetry

Classi€cation Theory of Algebraic if we extend the solution spaces to complex numbers, Varieties the lines, circles, parabolas become two-dimensional There is a research Ÿeld in mathematics called spheres with some punctures. By Ÿlling these . In algebraic geometry, we study punctures, (this process is called compactiŸcation,) the the geometric objects (called algebraic varieties) lines, circles, parabolas all become a two-dimensional deŸned as the solution spaces of polynomial sphere. This sphere is called a rational curve, which equations. For instance, lines, circles, and parabolas is the most fundamental one-dimensional algebraic (Figure 1) are algebraic varieties. Since the algebraic variety. Also an elliptic curve, which is deŸned by a varieties are geometric objects, we can study them cubic polynomial, becomes a two-dimensional torus. via geometric intuitions. On the other hand, since It is known that all the one-dimensional algebraic they are deŸned by polynomials, it is also possible varieties are surfaces with some doughnut type holes. to study them via algebraic methods. Also, algebraic The number of the doughnut type holes is called geometry is related to several other research Ÿelds the genus, and the complexity of a one-dimensional such as number theory and string theory. For instance, algebraic variety depends on its genus: genus zero an algebraic variety called an elliptic curve plays an (sphere), one (elliptic curve), more than one (general important role in the proof of Fermat’s last theorem type). The idea of the classiŸcation theory of one in number theory, and the three-dimensional Calabi- dimensional algebraic varieties is to study their Yau manifold appears as an extra dimension in string geometric structures once we determine which of the theory. In , the classiŸcation theory of algebraic above three types they belong. varieties is a central theme in algebraic geometry. The Fields medalists in Japan (, Heisuke Minimal Model Theory for Two- Hironaka, ) all contributed much to the Dimensional Algebraic Varieties classiŸcation theory of algebraic varieties. In a higher (more than or equal to two) dimensional The idea of the classiŸcation theory of algebraic case, algebraic varieties are not classiŸed in terms of varieties is, roughly speaking, as follows. First let us the numbers of doughnut type holes as in the one- consider the simplest case: the one-dimensional case. dimensional case. Instead, higher dimensional algebraic Although we say one dimensional, the solution spaces varieties are classiŸed in terms of , of the polynomials are extended to the complex which is different from the usual dimension. The numbers in algebraic geometry, so the real pictures complexity of a higher dimensional algebraic variety are two-dimensional surfaces (Figure 2). For instance, depends on its Kodaira dimension, so knowing it

4 Kavli IPMU News No. 20 December 2012 y y y y=x2

y=x x2+y2=1

0 0 x x 0 x

line circle parabola Figure 1 is a key step toward the classiŸcation. The global Minimal Model Theory for Three- geometric structures of higher dimensional algebraic Dimensional Algebraic Varieties varieties are complicated, however, and they are not As we mentioned above, the two-dimensional classiŸed as simple as in the one-dimensional case, minimal model theory was completed in a beautiful even if we knew their Kodaira dimension. The reason way. If we try to construct a similar theory for three- behind this complexity is that there are extra rational dimensional algebraic varieties, however, we Ÿnd a curves on the algebraic varieties that behave badly, so serious problem which was not found in the two we try to contract an extra rational curve and obtain dimensional case. That is, if we contract an extra a new algebraic variety. If we can repeat this process rational curve that behaves badly, then the resulting and Ÿnally obtain an algebraic variety without such variety may have a singularity. Here we say that an an extra rational curve (called minimal model), then algebraic variety has a singularity if we are not able we may try to study its global geometric structure. to Ÿnd a local coordinate. For instance, we are able This is the idea of the higher dimensional classiŸcation to Ÿnd a (real) two-dimensional coordinate on a one- theory. The above process Ÿnding the minimal model, dimensional algebraic variety since it is a surface with on which there is no extra rational curve, is called the doughnut type holes. Such a coordinate system is (MMP for short). not always found in the higher dimensional case. For The MMP for two-dimensional algebraic varieties instance, there is an algebraic variety that looks like a Feature was completed by an Italian school at the beginning cone, and we cannot Ÿnd a coordinate system at the of the 20th century. In this case, there is a further vertex. It is difŸcult to study the geometry of algebraic classiŸcation of minimal models. For instance, minimal varieties with singularities, and the three dimensional models of the Kodaira dimension zero are classiŸed minimal model theory was not developed for a while. into four types: K3 surfaces, Enriques surfaces, Abelian The above problem was excluded in the 1980’s, surfaces and elliptic surfaces. In each case, there is and the three dimensional minimal model theory an interesting geometry behind it. In particular, K3 was substantially developed. Through the efforts surfaces are two-dimensional analogue of elliptic of Shigefumi Mori, , Vyacheslav curves and three-dimensional Calabi-Yau manifolds, Shokurov, and others, a class of singularities (called and their geometry is closely related to the lattice terminal singularities), which are rather mild and theory. Also, since the mirror symmetry of K3 surfaces should make the three dimensional MMP work, was is described in terms of the lattice, it is actively studied introduced and investigated. It is possible that we now as a toy model of mirror symmetry. can contract extra rational curves for varieties with

5 genus 0 genus 1 genus ≧2 (rational curve) (elliptic curve) (general type) Figure 2 terminal singularities. If the resulting varieties also have sheaves roughly. The notion of coherent sheaves is a at worst terminal singularities, then we can continue generalization of functions on algebraic varieties. For the program. Unfortunately, this is not true, since a instance, the set of functions on an algebraic variety, very bad curve called a žipping curve is contracted to which locally written as polynomials, gives a coherent a non-terminal singularity. In this case, the program sheaf called a structure sheaf. This is not a unique was shown to continue if we replace the žipping choice of a , as structure sheaves on curve to another rational curve. This process is called sub algebraic varieties also give more examples of a žip. The existence of žips was a serious problem, coherent sheaves. There are many coherent sheaves on but shown by Shigefumi Mori in 1998, and the three- an algebraic variety, and if we consider each coherent dimensional minimal model theory was completed. sheaf as an“ object” and introduce“ morphisms” One of the features of three dimensional minimal which relate pairs of coherent sheaves, then we model theory is that the resulting minimal models obtain a mathematical system on the set of coherent are not unique, but any two of them are connected sheaves. You can imagine this system by considering by a sequence of žops. A žop is very similar to a žip, each coherent sheaf as a point, and a morphism as an which replaces a žopping curve that is not so bad as a arrow between two points corresponding to coherent žipping curve by another rational curve. It was known sheaves. Such a mathematical system, with the notion that žops preserve much geometric information. In the of objects and morphisms, is called a category. 1990’s the ultimate of such a phenomena was found, The category of coherent sheaves is deŸned as that is the derived categories of coherent sheaves are above, but it does not have a good property in equivalent under žops. This was Ÿrst proved by Alexei some senses. Suppose, for instance, that there is a Bondal and Dmitri Orlov for particular žops, and map between two algebraic varieties and consider later proved by Tom Bridgeland for arbitrary three- the problem associating a coherent sheaf on one dimensional žops. of them to one on another variety. There is a naive way of doing this, but it sometimes loses the Derived Categories of Coherent information of a coherent sheaf. In order to solve Sheaves this issue, Grothendieck considered complexes of The notion of derived categories of coherent coherent sheaves. Let us explain the complexes of sheaves on algebraic varieties was introduced by coherent sheaves by comparing them with points in the 1960’s. In order and arrows as above. We Ÿrst put the numbers 1, to explain this notion, we Ÿrst explain coherent 2, 3, … on a Ÿnite number of points, and then draw

6 Kavli IPMU News No. 20 December 2012 arrows between consecutive numbers from smaller different geometric theories. numbers to bigger numbers. We associate coherent Since the proposal of homological mirror symmetry sheaves with the numbered points, and morphisms conjecture, it has been recognized that the derived with arrows between consecutive numbers. Such category of coherent sheaves is an essential a diagram satisfying a certain property is called a mathematical object that realizes symmetry among complex of coherent sheaves. The of algebraic varieties. Also through mirror symmetry, coherent sheaves is deŸned to be the category whose several equivalences of derived categories of coherent objects consist of complexes of coherent sheaves. sheaves on different varieties have been predicted. The morphisms in this category are rather difŸcult, so The derived equivalence under žops is one of them. we omit the explanation. If we consider the derived This is proved for three-dimensional žops, but it is still category of coherent sheaves, then we can solve the an open problem in higher-dimensional cases, and a above issue associating a coherent sheaf on a variety new idea is required. to one on another variety. That is, if we associate an As a development of the idea of the derived object in the derived category of coherent sheaves equivalence under žops, it is a natural direction of instead of a coherent sheaf, then we don’t lose research to study how derived categories of coherent information. sheaves behave under steps of MMP. At a special So far, we have discussed a technical aspect of step of MMP, it is observed that the derived category derived categories. The originally derived category was gets smaller by Bondal-Orlov and Yujiro Kawamata. introduced in order to solve a technical problem, so it So we expect that the MMP is a program that makes was not considered to be related to the geometry of the derived category smaller, and even if the minimal algebraic varieties at the begging of its introduction. models are not unique, they are equivalent at the level Such an idea drastically changed in 1994. of the derived category. It is a very difŸcult problem to show this in full generality since we have to deal with Mirror Symmetry and the Minimal singular varieties. If the above idea is realized, however, Model Theory then it not only provides a new viewpoint of MMP but In 1994, at the International Congress of also several applications are expected. Mathematics held at Zurich, Now, by a slightly different viewpoint, I am trying to proposed homological mirror symmetry conjecture. understand each step of MMP as a space of objects Feature This conjecture predicts equivalence between the (called moduli space) in the derived category on the derived category of coherent sheaves on an algebraic starting algebraic variety. The keyword is the notion of variety and a certain category (called Fukaya category) stability conditions on derived categories introduced determined by a symplectic manifold mirror to it. The by Bridgeland in 2002 inspired by the work of string idea behind this conjecture is to realize symmetry theory. The results are not satisfactory at this moment, in string theory by regarding objects in derived but once this idea is realized, I expect applications categories of coherent sheaves, and Fukaya categories, to several directions such as quantum invariants and as D-branes of different types. It was surprising that mirror symmetry. In this way, although the minimal the derived category of coherent sheaves, which is model theory was developed in order to classify a rather technical and abstract mathematical notion, algebraic varieties, it is now connected with several was related to string theory. It was also surprising research Ÿelds through string theory and derived that algebraic geometry and symplectic geometry categories, and we see a new development of this are predicted to be equivalent, as they seemed to be theory.

7