DOCSLIB.ORG

Mitigating Biodiversity Impacts of Sports Events

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mitigating Biodiversity Impacts of Sports Events Mitigating biodiversity impacts of sports events INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE These guidelines are part of a series produced by IUCN on sport and biodiversity. The first guidelines,Sport and Biodiversity, were published in 2018 and give a broad overview of the topic. The second, published in 2019, Mitigating biodiversity impacts of new sports venues, look at the development of new venues for sports and their impacts on biodiversity. These latest guidelines focus on ways to mitigate biodiversity impacts associated with sports events. They are divided into two parts: Part 1 Laying the foundations provides recommendations for the concept, strategy and planning phases; Part 2 Delivering the sports event focusses on measures to implement as the event takes place. About IUCN IUCN is a membership Union uniquely composed of both government and civil society organisations. It provides public, private and non-governmental organisations with the knowledge and tools that enable human progress, economic development and nature conservation to take place together. Created in 1948, IUCN is now the world’s largest and most diverse environmental network, harnessing the knowledge, resources and reach of more than 1,300 Member organisations and some 15,000 experts. It is a leading provider of conservation data, assessments and analysis. Its broad membership enables IUCN to fill the role of incubator and trusted repository of best practices, tools and international standards. IUCN provides a neutral space in which diverse stakeholders including governments, NGOs, scientists, businesses, local communities, indigenous peoples organisations and others can work together to forge and implement solutions to environmental challenges and achieve sustainable development. Working with many partners and supporters, IUCN implements a large and diverse portfolio of conservation projects worldwide. Combining the latest science with the traditional knowledge of local communities, these projects work to reverse habitat loss, restore ecosystems and improve people’s well-being. www.iucn.org https://twitter.com/IUCN/ Mitigating biodiversity impacts of sports events The designation of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN. This publication has been made possible in part by funding from the International Olympic Committee. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Copyright: © 2020 IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior written permission from the copyright holder, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Brownlie, Susie, Bull, Joseph W. and Stubbs David (2020). Mitigating biodiversity impacts of sports events. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. xiv+80 pp. ISBN: 978-2-8317-2036-4 (PDF) 978-2-8317-2039-5 (print) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.04.en Cover photo: © World Rowing Federation Edited by: Anna Knee Layout by: Imre Sebestyén jr / Unit Graphics Available from: IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Business and Biodiversity Programme Rue Mauverney 28 1196 Gland Switzerland Tel +41 22 999 0000 Fax +41 22 999 0002 [email protected] www.iucn.org/resources/publications The text of this book is printed on recycled paper. Table of Contents Executive summary .............................................................. vi Acknowledgements .............................................................viii Glossary of terms, abbreviations and acronyms ...............................ix Introduction ........................................................................1 Who should read these guidelines. 1 Scope of the guidelines ...............................................................1 What is biodiversity and why is it important? ................................................2 The event lifecycle ....................................................................2 Links between sports events and biodiversity ..............................................3 How sports events impact biodiversity ................................................4 The benefits of biodiversity to sports events ............................................4 How sports events can benefit biodiversity ............................................4 1 PART 1. Laying the foundations: planning for the effective management of biodiversity opportunities and impacts ...................8 1.1 Concept phase .................................................................9 Venue selection .................................................................9 Screening for biodiversity risks .....................................................11 Other issues potentially impacting biodiversity .........................................12 Defining the scope of the event ....................................................14 Timing of the event ..............................................................14 Bidding for an event .............................................................15 1.2 Strategic planning ..............................................................17 Organisational governance and leadership ............................................17 Setting a policy and objectives for biodiversity conservation ...............................18 Establishing a management system .................................................18 Assessing biodiversity impacts ....................................................20 Post-event planning .............................................................21 Stakeholder engagement .........................................................21 Communications ...............................................................22 1.3 Detailed planning ...............................................................23 Venue design and layout .........................................................23 Sourcing ......................................................................23 Operational planning ............................................................27 Education and training ...........................................................27 Communications ...............................................................28 Partnerships with conservation organisations ...........................................29 Measuring, monitoring and evaluating performance .....................................30 Sustainability reporting ...........................................................32 Mitigating biodiversity impacts of sports events iii 2 Part 2. Delivering the sports event: addressing biodiversity opportunities and impacts during the event ............................... 34 2.1 Supporting biodiversity conservation through the sports event ............................35 2.2 Measures to mitigate the impacts of sports events .....................................38 2.2.1. Fields and grounds management ............................................40 2.2.2. Overlay ................................................................46 2.2.3. Outdoor cabling and wiring .................................................50 2.2.4. Outdoor security .........................................................52 2.2.5. Outdoor lighting ..........................................................54 2.2.6. Public service announcements, outdoor sound systems and noise ..................55 2.2.7. Broadcasting outdoors ....................................................57 2.2.8. Solid and liquid waste management ..........................................58 2.2.9. Catering ................................................................61 2.2.10. Transport and on-site traffic management ......................................63 2.2.11. Outdoor spectator management .............................................65 2.2.12. Management of sports teams ...............................................67 3 Useful links, sources and materials ........................................ 71 3.1 Sustainable sport and sports events ................................................71 3.2 Sports and sports events that consider biodiversity .....................................72 3.3 Wild animal-friendly fencing, wiring and barriers ........................................73 3.4 Ecological restoration ............................................................73 3.5 Ecological monitoring ............................................................73 3.6 Sustainable sourcing and procurement ..............................................73 3.7 Reporting on performance ........................................................74 3.8 Biodiversity information on important biodiversity areas ..................................75 References ....................................................................... 77 iv Mitigating biodiversity impacts of sports events Boxes Box 1: Areas of high importance for biodiversity conservation ................................10 Box 2: Key Biodiversity Areas ..........................................................11
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alltime Boys Top 10 Lc, to 15 Sep 2010
    Alltime Australian Boys Top 10 long course 11/u to 18 yr - at 15th September 2010 email any errors or omissions to [email protected] Australian Age Points - (APP) are set for 50 = 10th Alltime Aus Age Time and 40 = 2011 Australian Age QT Points are only allocated to Australian Age Championship events with lowest age at 13/u Note that the lowest points in these rankings is 44 points For more information on the AAP, email [email protected] AAP Male 11 & Under 50 Free 1 26.94 LF Te Haumi Maxwell 11 NSW 12/06/2006 School Sport Australia Champ. 2 27.49 LF Kyle Chalmers 11 SA 6/06/2010 School Sport Australia Swimming Championships 3 27.53 LF Oliver Moody 11 NSW 6/06/2010 School Sport Australia Swimming Championships 4 27.93 LF Nicholas Groenewald 11 NUN 15/03/2009 The Last Blast 09' 5 27.97 LF Bailey Lawson 11 PBC 13/03/2009 2009 Swimming Gold Coast Championships 6*P 28.01 L Nicholas Capomolia 11 VIC 13/09/2009 School Sport Australia Swimming Championships 6*F 28.01 L Cody Simpson 11 QLD 1/12/2008 Pacific School Games 2008 Swimming 8 28.04 LF Anthony Truong 11 NSW 28/11/2005 Melbourne - Pacific School Games 9 28.23 LF Michael Buchanan 11 QLD 14/05/2001 Canberra - Aus Primary Schools 10 28.26 LF Samuel Ritchens 11 LCOV 16/01/2010 2010 NSW State 10/U-12 Years Age Championship Male 11 & Under 100 Free 1 59.49 LF Peter Fisher 11 NSW 8/05/1991 ? Tri Series 2 59.95 LF Oliver Moody 11 NSW 6/06/2010 School Sport Australia Swimming Championships 3 59.98 LF John Walz 11 QLD 11/01/1999 Brisbane - Jan 1999 4 1:00.39 LF Te Haumi Maxwell 11 NSW 12/06/2006 School Sport Australia Champ.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of the Games of the New Emerging Forces' and Indonesia's
    The International Journal of the History of Sport ISSN: 0952-3367 (Print) 1743-9035 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fhsp20 The Legacy of the Games of the New Emerging Forces and Indonesia’s Relationship with the International Olympic Committee Friederike Trotier To cite this article: Friederike Trotier (2017): The Legacy of the Games of the New Emerging Forces and Indonesia’s Relationship with the International Olympic Committee, The International Journal of the History of Sport, DOI: 10.1080/09523367.2017.1281801 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2017.1281801 Published online: 22 Feb 2017. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=fhsp20 Download by: [93.198.244.140] Date: 22 February 2017, At: 10:11 THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF SPORT, 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2017.1281801 The Legacy of the Games of the New Emerging Forces and Indonesia’s Relationship with the International Olympic Committee Friederike Trotier Department of Southeast Asian Studies, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany ABSTRACT KEYWORDS The Games of the New Emerging Forces (GANEFO) often serve as Indonesia; GANEFO; Asian an example of the entanglement of sport, Cold War politics and the games; Southeast Asian Non-Aligned Movement in the 1960s. Indonesia as the initiator plays games; International a salient role in the research on this challenge for the International Olympic Committee (IOC) Olympic Committee (IOC). The legacy of GANEFO and Indonesia’s further relationship with the IOC, however, has not yet drawn proper academic attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Sport Competitions
    APES 1(2011) 2:225-227 Šiljak, V and Boškan, V. : MULTI-SPORT COMPETITIONS ... MULTI-SPORT COMPETITIONS UDC: 796.09 (100) (091) (Professional peper ) Violeta Šiljak and Vesna Boškan Alfa University, Faculty of Management in Sport, Belgrade, Serbia Abstract Apart from the Olympic games, world championships, the university students games – The Universiade, there are many other regional sport movements organized as well. The World Games, the Asian Games, the Panamerican Games, the Commonwealth Games, the Balkan Games and so on, are some of multi-sport competitions all having the mutual features of competitions in numerous sports which last for several days. Some sports which are not a part of the Olympic Games programme are included into these world/regional games. These games are organized with the intention of impro- ving international sport/competitions. Keywords: Olympic games, World Games, students games, regional sports Introduction Games Association under the patronage of the Multi-sports competitions are organized sports International Olympic Committee. Some of the events that last several days and include competi- sports that were in the program of the World tion in great number of sports/events. The Olympic Games have become the Olympic disciplines (such Games as the first modern multi-sport event serve as triathlon), while some of them used to Olympic as a model for organizing all other major multi- sports in the past, but not any more (such as rope sports competitions. These several-day events are pulling). The selection of sports at the last World held in a host city, where the winners are awarded Games was done based on the criterion adopted by medals and competitions are mostly organized the IOC on August 12, 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Covenants
    Law Commission Consultation Paper No 211 CONSERVATION COVENANTS A Consultation Paper ii THE LAW COMMISSION – HOW WE CONSULT About the Law Commission: The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Rt Hon Lord Justice Lloyd Jones, Chairman, Professor Elizabeth Cooke, David Hertzell, Professor David Ormerod QC and Frances Patterson QC. The Chief Executive is Elaine Lorimer. Topic of this consultation: This Consultation Paper examines the case for introducing “conservation covenants” into the law of England and Wales, and considers how a scheme of conservation covenants might be framed. A conservation covenant is a private agreement made by a landowner, for the purposes of conservation. We discuss the current law and set out a number of provisional proposals and options for reform on which we invite consultees’ views. Geographical scope: The Consultation Paper applies to the law of England and Wales. Impact assessment: In Chapter 9 of this Consultation Paper, consultees are asked also to comment on the likely costs and benefits of any changes provisionally proposed. Consultees’ responses will inform our final recommendations and a formal impact assessment document that will be published with our Report. Availability of materials: This Consultation is available on our website at: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/consultations/conservation-covenants.htm. Duration of the consultation: We invite responses from 28 March 2013 to 21 June 2013. Comments may be sent: By email to: [email protected] or By post to: Luke Campbell, Law Commission, Steel House, 11 Tothill Street, London SW1H 9LJ Tel: 020 3334 0200 / Fax: 020 3334 0201 If you send your comments by post, it would be helpful if, whenever possible, you could send them to us electronically as well (for example, on CD or by email to the above address, in any commonly used format).
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Element of the General Plan
    General Plan Land Use Element Adopted December 15, 1993 Amended November 9, 2011 Amended July 22, 2015 Amended July 26, 2016 Amended April 26, 2017 Amended September 26, 2017 Amended December 13, 2017 Amended December 17, 2019 Amended October 6, 2020 County of Sacramento Office of Planning and Environmental Review . This page is blank County of Sacramento General Plan Land Use Element Amended October 6, 2020 Table of Contents SECTION I ..................................................................................................................................... 1 ELEMENT INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 Required Contents of the Land Use Element .............................................................................. 1 Concepts of the Land Use Element ............................................................................................. 1 Relationship to Other Elements .................................................................................................. 2 Relationship to Other County Planning Tools ............................................................................ 3 Relationship to Regional Planning Efforts ................................................................................. 6 THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DIAGRAM ......................................................................... 7 How to Use the Land Use Diagram ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Report 2020
    London Borough of Enfield Review of Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation An Addendumx to the Enfield Blue and Green Strategy Final report London Borough of Enfield Review of Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation An Addendum to the Enfield Blue and Green Strategy Version Status Prepared Checked Approved Date 1. Draft report for client comment R. Turner S. Swindlehurst S. Swindlehurst 06.11.2020 A. Coleman R. Glackin 2. Final Report R. Turner R. Turner R. Turner 17.11.2020 3. Final Report – re-issued to take R. Turner R. Turner R. Turner 01.04.2021 into consideration comments from stakeholders Bristol Land Use Consultants Ltd Landscape Design Edinburgh Registered in England Strategic Planning & Assessment Glasgow Registered number 2549296 Development Planning London Registered office: Urban Design & Masterplanning Manchester 250 Waterloo Road Environmental Impact Assessment London SE1 8RD Landscape Planning & Assessment landuse.co.uk Landscape Management 100% recycled paper Ecology Historic Environment GIS & Visualisation Contents Review of Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation November 2020 Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Background 1 Chapter 2 Methods 3 Site Selection 3 Desk Review 3 Site Survey 3 Site Evaluation 4 Limitations 6 Chapter 3 Summary of the SINC Assessment 7 Summary 7 Recommendations 7 Summary of SINC Review 8 Appendix A Figure 1.1-1.3: Biodiversity Assets in the Borough and Figure 1.2 Areas of Deficiency in Access to Nature A-1 Appendix B Figure 3.1: Summary of SINC Review Recommendations B-1 Appendix C Summary of SINC Review C-1 Appendix D Proformas D-1 LUC I i Chapter- 1 Introduction Review of Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation November 2020 Chapter 1 Introduction LUC was appointed in June 2020 by Enfield London Borough Council to undertake a review of existing Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC) within the borough.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Creag Meagaidh National Nature Reserve
    Scotland’s National Nature Reserves For more information about Creag Meagaidh National Nature Reserve please contact: Scottish Natural Heritage, Creag Meagaidh NNR, Aberarder, Kinlochlaggan, Newtonmore, Inverness-shire, PH20 1BX Telephone/Fax: 01528 544 265 Email: [email protected] The Story of Creag Meagaidh National Nature Reserve The Story of Creag Meagaidh National Nature Reserve Foreword Creag Meagaidh National Nature Reserve (NNR), named after the great whalebacked ridge which dominates the Reserve, is one of the most diverse and important upland sites in Scotland. Creag Meagaidh is a complex massif, with numerous mountain tops and an extensive high summit plateau edged by a dramatic series of ice-carved corries and gullies. The Reserve extends from the highest of the mountain tops to the shores of Loch Laggan. The plateau is carpeted in moss-heath and is an important breeding ground for dotterel. The corries support unusual artic- alpine plants and the lower slopes have scattered patches of ancient woodland dominated by birch. Located 45 kilometres (km) northeast of Fort William and covering nearly 4,000 hectares (ha), the Reserve is owned and managed by Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH). Creag Meagaidh has been a NNR since 1986 and during the last twenty years SNH has worked to restore natural habitats, particularly woodland, on the Reserve. Like much of the Highlands, the vegetation has been heavily grazed for centuries, so it was decided to reduce the number of grazing animals by removing sheep and culling red deer. The aim was not to eliminate grazing animals altogether, but to keep numbers at a level that allowed the habitats, especially the woodland, to recover.
    [Show full text]
  • Working at the Landscape Scale: Lessons from the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Planning Process
    Working at the Landscape Scale: Lessons from the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Planning Process By: Anna Bengtson Alyssa Cudmore Brian Fadie David Markowitz A project report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Natural Resources and Environment) at the University of Michigan August 2016 Faculty Advisor: Professor Steven Yaffee Client: U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, California State Office Working at the Landscape Scale: Lessons from the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Planning Process Acknowledgements The authors of this report would like to express our gratitude for the mentorship and assistance of the following with this project: We would like to thank Dr. Steven Yaffee, Professor at the School of Natural Resources and Environment and Director of the Ecosystem Management Initiative at the University of Michigan. His insight and guidance were invaluable for the completion of this report. We would also like to thank Michael Sintetos, Renewable Energy Program Manager for the Bureau of Land Management in California. He was essential for setting up this project and introducing key players and sites to our team. In addition, we want to thank the Bureau of Land Management’s California state office for providing funding that allowed the team to visit the DRECP planning region and meet in-person with individuals. We are also grateful for the funding provided by the University of Michigan’s School of Natural Resources and Environment to assist with the creation and presentation of this material. Lastly, we would like to extend our gratitude to all those who allowed us to inquire about their experiences with the DRECP to allow for a more comprehensive report.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Areas Such As the Cairngorms, Taking Into Consideration the Case for Arrangements on National Park Lines in Scotland.”
    THE MOUNTAIN AREAS OF SCOTLAND -i CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT A report by the COUNTRYSIDE COMMISSION FOR SCOTLAND THE MOUNTAIN AREAS OF SCOTLAND CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT COUNTRYSIDE COMMISSION FOR SCOTLAND Opposite: Glen Affric. 2 CONTENTS CHAIRMAN’S PREFACE 3 INTRODUCTION 4-5 THE VALUE OF OUR MOUNTAIN LAND 7-9 LAND USEAND CHANGE 10-16 WHAT IS GOING WRONG 18-24 PUTTING THINGS RIGHT 25-33 MAKING THINGS HAPPEN 34-37 THE COMMISSION’S RECOMMENDATIONS 38-40 Annex 1: The World Conservation Strategy and Sustainable Development 42 Annex 2: IUCN Categories for Conservation Management and the Concept of Zoning 43 - 44 Annex 3: Outline Powers and Administration of National Parks, Land Management Forums and Joint Committees ... 45 - 47 Annex 4: THE CAIRNGORMS 48 - 50 Annex 5: LOCH LOMOND AND THE TROSSACHS 51 - 53 Annex 6: BEN NEVIS / GLEN COE / BLACK MOUNT 54 -56 Annex 7: WESTER ROSS 57 -59 Annex 8: How the Review was Carried Out 60 Annex 9: Consultees and Contributors to the Review 61 - 62 Annex 10: Bibliography 63 - 64 3 CHAIRMAN’S PREFACE The beauty of Scotland’s countryside is one of our greatest assets. It is the Commission’s duty to promote its conservation, but this can only be achieved with the co-operation, commitment and effort of all those who use and manage the land for many different purposes. The Commission has been involved with few environmental and social issues which generated so much discussion as the question of secur ing the protection of Scotland’s mountain heritage for the benefit, use and enjoyment of present and future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Men's All-Time Top 50 World Performers-Performances
    Men’s All-Time World Top 50 Performers-Performances’ Rankings Page 111 ο f 727272 MEN’S ALL-TIME TOP 50 WORLD PERFORMERS-PERFORMANCES RANKINGS ** World Record # 2nd-Performance All-Time +* European Record *+ Commonwealth Record *" Latin-South American Record ' U.S. Open Record * National Record r Relay Leadoff Split p Preliminary Time + Olympic Record ^ World Championship Record a Asian Record h Hand time A Altitude-aided 50 METER FREESTYLE Top 51 Performances 20.91** Cesar Augusto Filho Cielo, BRA/Auburn BRA Nationals Sao Paulo 12-18-09 (Reaction Time: +0-66. (Note: first South American swimmer to set 50 free world-record. Fifth man to hold 50-100 meter freestyle world records simultaneously: Others: Matt Biondi [USA], Alexander Popov [RUS], Alain Bernard [FRA], Eamon Sullivan [AUS]. (Note: first time world-record broken in South America. First world-record swum in South America since countryman Da Silva went 26.89p @ the Trofeu Maria Lenk meet in Rio on May 8, 2009. First Brazilian world record-setter in South America: Ricardo Prado, who won 400 IM @ 1982 World Championships in Guayaquil.) 20.94+*# Fred Bousquet, FRA/Auburn FRA Nationals/WCTs Montpellier 04-26-09 (Reaction Time: +0.74. (Note: first world-record of career, first man sub 21.0, first Auburn male world record-setter since America’s Rowdy Gaines [49.36, 100 meter freestyle, Austin, 04/81. Gaines broke his own 200 free wr following summer @ U.S. WCTs.) (Note: Bousquet also first man under 19.0 for 50 yard freestyle [18.74, NCAAs, 2005, Minneapolis]) 21.02p Cielo BRA Nationals Sao Paulo 12-18-09 21.08 Cielo World Championships Rome 08-02-09 (Reaction Time: +0.68.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetland Action Plan for British Columbia
    Wetland Action Plan for British Columbia IAN BARNETT Ducks Unlimited Kamloops, 954 A Laval Crescent, Kamloops, BC, V2C 5P5, Canada, email [email protected] Abstract: In the fall of 2002, the Wetland Stewardship Partnership was formed to address the need for improved conservation of wetland ecosystems (including estuaries) in British Columbia. One of the first exercises undertaken by the Wetland Stewardship Partnership was the creation of a Wetland Action Plan. The Wetland Action Plan illustrates the extent of the province's wetlands, describes their value to British Columbians, assesses threats to wetlands, evaluates current conservation initiatives, and puts forth a set of specific actions and objectives to help mitigate wetland loss or degradation. It was determined that the most significant threats to wetlands usually come from urban expansion, industrial development, and agriculture. The Wetland Stewardship Partnership then examined which actions would most likely have the greatest positive influence on wetland conservation and restoration, and listed nine primary objectives, in order of priority, in a draft ‘Framework for Action’. Next, the partnership determined that meeting the first four of these objectives could be sufficient to provide meaningful and comprehensive wetland protection, and so, committed to working together towards enacting specific recommendations in relation to these objectives. These four priority objectives are as follows: (1) Work effectively with all levels of government to promote improved guidelines and stronger legislative frameworks to support wetlands conservation; (2) Provide practical information and recommendations on methods to reduce impacts to wetlands to urban, rural, and agricultural proponents who wish to undertake a development in a wetland area; (3) Improve the development and delivery of public education and stewardship programs that encourage conservation of wetlands, especially through partnerships; and (4) Conduct a conservation risk assessment to make the most current inventory information on the status of B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Southeast Asian Games Federation
    SOUTH EAST ASIAN GAMES FEDERATION CHARTER AND RULES DEFINITIONS 1 “NOC” means the National Olympic Committee of a South East Asian Country that has been accepted as a member of the South East Asian Games Federation. 2. “HOST NOC” means the National Olympic Committee that has been entrusted with the Honor of hosting the SEA Games. 3 “FEDERATION” means the South East Asian Games Federation. 4 “COUNCIL” means the Council of the South East Asian Games Federation. 5 “DELEGATE” means a person nominated to the Council of the South East Asian Games Federation by an NOC. 6 “EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE” means the Committee set up by the Council under Rule 11. 7 “SEA GAMES” means the South East Asian Games. 8 “SOUTH EAST ASIA” means the whole territory comprising the following countries: Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Timor Leste, Thailand, and Vietnam. FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES 1 The SEA Games shall be held every two years in between the years fixed for celebrations of the Olympic Games and the Asian Games. 2 The SEA Games shall be numbered from the first SEAP Games in Bangkok 1959. 3 The direction of the SEA Games shall be vested in the Council of the Federation. 4(a) The honor of holding the SEA Games shall be entrusted to the NOC of each country in rotation in alphabetical order, four (4) years in advance. (b) An NOC unable to accept the honor of holding the SEA Games in its turn shall inform the Council not later than one year after the Games had been awarded.
    [Show full text]