Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 74, No. 5, pp. 2072-2075, May 1977 Ecology Colony-specific territorial pheromone in the African weaver Oecophylla longinoda (Latreille) (aggression/colony warfare/competition/recruitment/ritualization) BERT HOLLDOBLER AND EDWARD 0. WILSON Department of Biology, Museum of Comparative Zoology Laboratories, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 Contributed by Edward 0. Wilson, March 3, 1977

ABSTRACT Major workers of Oecophylla longinoda mark hardened into a smooth, shellac-like solid on its surface. A their territories with persistent pheromones that are distin- slightly increasing gradient in density of this anal liquid was guishable to the at the colony level. Workers detecting the deposits of an alien colony respond with increased amounts of noted toward the bridge connecting the arena with the nest, but aversive and aggressive behavior, and they later recruit nest- elsewhere the drops were Poisson-distributed. When major mates to the area at a higher rate. Colonies entering a field workers discovered entirely new terrain, they recruited nest- impregnated with their own scent also gain an initial advantage mates intensively with odor trails produced from the rectal in warfare with other colonies. The pheromones are located at gland and released through the anus (see description of this least in part in drops of rectal sac fluid deposited by workers phenomenon in ref. 9). They then deposited drops of rectal sac over the territorial surface. fluid at a high rate, also through the anus. One colony composed of several thousand workers, for example, deposited approxi- A territory is usually defined as an area occupied more or less mately 500 drops on an arena floor during the first hour. exclusively by an by means of overt defense or adver- Thereafter, the rate dropped drastically and remained ap- tisement (1). It follows that a true territorial pheromone is a proximately constant for a period of three weeks, until counts substance deposited on a portion of the home range that induces were discontinued. This behavior contrasts with that of most aversive or agonistic behavior in intruders belonging to the same other species, which discard rectal material in kitchen middens species. Many kinds of mammals, including rodents, ungulates, or other restricted areas outside the nest. It led us to suspect that carnivores, and prosimians, mark portions of their home ranges the Oecophylla workers deposit a special scent to mark their with scent from excrement and exocrine glands. Authors have home range and perhaps even to advertise their territory. often ascribed a territorial role to these substances, but the ev- The ability of Oecophylla major workers to recognize their idence is-in most instances anecdotal and inconclusive (2). Scent own deposits was tested by the following method. A colony was deposited by house mice (Mus musculus) and European rabbits allowed to mark the papered floor of an arena for a period of (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in their territories causes intruders of several days. Then the ants were removed overnight and the the same species to display increased alertness and readiness arena was-shifted slightly to one side to make room for a second, to flee (3-5). Male mice are inhibited from trespassing by the identical arena that had been marked by an alien colony of smell of urinary scent alone (3). In addition, strong anecdotal Oecophylla. The alignment of the two arenas was otherwise the evidence (6) suggests that wolves use urinary scent as a terri- same as that of the original arena in its undisplaced position. torial pheromone. The colony was then given access to both arenas simultaneously To our knowledge no true territorial pheromone has been by the emplacement of thin wooden bridges. Four replicate demonstrated in the social . Most species of social insects experiments were performed using two colonies and both possess colony odors by which workers distinguish nestmates possible arrangements of the arenas (that is, experimental arena from aliens, and in the Pogonomyrmex harvester ants col- either to the right or left of the control arena). The results, which ony-specific scent is imparted to soil in the immediate vicinity were essentially the same in all replicate experiments, suggested of the nest (1, 7, 8). But such substances are not known to induce the presence of a colony-specific territorial pheromone. The aversion or aggression in the absence of the ants themselves. In first major workers to enter the alien arena displayed greater the course of studies of the multiple recruitment systems of the caution and a significantly higher rate of aggressive posturing, African Oecophylla longinoda, we obtained evi- which consists of opening the mandibles and lifting the abdo- dence that workers of this exceptionally aggressive species use men vertically over the remainder of the body (Fig. 1). This pheromones to advertise territories and deter invasion by alien response was especially notable because no alien workers had workers. Furthermore, the substances are effective even in the been in the arena for the previous 12 hr and none was in sight absence of the marking ants. during the tests. The exploring ants showed a particular interest in the anal spots, stopping frequently to inspect them with their METHODS AND RESULTS antennae-organs that contain the major external chemo- Queenright colonies of Oecophylla longinoda were collected receptors. After a few minutes of cautious trespassing some of in the Rabai District of Kenya and installed in the laboratory the foragers then returned to their nest tree while laying odor on potted grapefruit and fig trees, where they used larval silk trails, initiating a full-scale recruitment and invasion into the to construct woven nests characteristic of the species. The alien arena. Lesser amounts of recruitment activity occurred foraging workers were also given access to 71 X 142 cm wooden simultaneously into the familiar "home" arena. arenas surrounded by 14-cm-high walls. In order to be certain that the Oecophylla workers were Major workers (the principal foraging caste) responded to recognizing their own as opposed to alien deposits and not some fresh surfaces in the arenas by depositing large drops of liquid other features of particular arenas unnoticed by us, we con- through the anus that apparently originated from the rectal ducted the following additional experiment. Pieces of fresh vesicle. This material either soaked into the substratum or paper 15 X 15 cm in area were placed on the floors of the are- 2072 Downloaded by guest on September 25, 2021 Ecology: H611dobler and Wilson Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74 (1977) 2073

FIG. 1. Threat posture of an Oecophylla longinoda major worker. nas, and the Oecophylla major workers were allowed to mark was directed to the anal spots in so consistent a fashion as to them with anal spots during a period of two or more days. The support the hypothesis that at least some of the territorial marked pieces were removed and then reinserted into the same pheromone is contained in the droplets. Furthermore, the or an alien arena. Freshly cut, unmarked squares were also pheromone is persistent. A significant response to one alien offered as general controls. The behavior of the major workers square chosen at random was still obtained 12 days after it had approaching the various squares were noted during four or five been marked by the ants. successive 2-min intervals. The provenance and significance Experiments were next designed in an attempt to localize the of each category of squares were as follows: anatomical origin of the territorial substances. When the Oe- Control 1. A fresh, unmarked 15 X 15 cm square of paper cophylla were fed honey water dyed red with Azorubin S was introduced to colony A as a general control. (Chroma), the dye accumulated in the hindgut after several Control 2. A square previously marked by colony A was days and then began to appear in substantial quantities in the reintroduced to colony A in order to measure the response of anal spots. Since the dye was at this time almost exclusively colony A to its own markings. limited within the body to the hindgut, we concluded that at Control 3. A square previously marked by colony B was least some of the contents of the anal spots did indeed originate reintroduced to colony B in order to measure the response of from the rectal vesicle. We then dissected 20 rectal bladders colony B to its own pheromone. from workers of a foreign colony and squeezed their contents Experimental 1. A square previously marked by colony B onto the surface of a 5 X 5 cm paper square in a pattern of was introduced to colony A to obtain the response of A major randomly distributed spots. A second paper square was similarly workers to an alien colony's pheromone; the first of two iden- spotted with the rectal sac contents of 20 workers from the home tical tests. colony. One to two days later the two squares were laid simul- Experimental 2. A repetition of experimental 1 above, dif- taneously on the floor of the arena of the home colony, 30 cm fering only in that a second square marked by B was introduced from each other, and the responses of nearby foraging workers to A; the second of two identical tests. were noted. The results of five replicate experiments are pre- The data, summarized in Table 1, demonstrate that the sented in Table 2. No significant difference was found in the Oecophylla major workers were able to distinguish the deposits initial attractiveness of the two kinds of squares (top section in of alien colonies from those of their own nestmates. As in the Table 2). However, the alien marks induced a higher frequency first, dual-arena test, they responded with a higher frequency of hostile posturing (middle section) as well as closer inspection of initial aversion and aggressive displays, and their attention (bottom section). In the use of posturing, in all five replicate Downloaded by guest on September 25, 2021 2074 Ecology: Holldobler and Wilson Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA 74 (1977) Table 1. Responses of foraging Oecophylla longinoda Table 2. The responses of foraging Qecophylla longinoda colonies to unmarked paper squares and similar squares workers to paper squares (5 X 5 cm) experimentally marked by their own nestmates and spotted with contents of 20 hindguts dissected out of members of an alien colony their own nestmates (control) and members of an alien colony (experimental) Re- In- Stepping pelled In ag- specting Experiment Control Experimental P Kind of square onto by gressive anal offered square square display spots Mean number of workers stepping onto paper I 19.0 + 11.9 22.4 +11.2 Control 1: II 7.2+6.8 13.7+6.8 fresh paper 20.2 0.2 0.2 III 15.5 + 6.9 14.0 + 3.9 Control 2: IV 12.7 + 5.7 16.0 + 4.1 A paper to V 16.1 + 9.5 18.5+ 8.1 A colony 20.3 0 0.3 0.8 Workers showing aggressive display, % Control 3: I 30.2 ± 21.1 53.9 12.1 0.050.1 B paper to V 50.1 ± 17.7 54.8 + 12.9 P> 0.1 A colony 12.0 2.7 7.7 8.7 Workers inspecting spots, % Experimental 2: I 30.6 + 15.9 52.9 + 4.8 P <0.02 B paper to II 18.9 + 23.1 44.1 + 32.7 P >0.1 A colony 12.5 2.2 4.2 6.0 III 13.9 + 11.5 26.3 + 16.0 P > 0.1 IV 41.1 + 19.7 41.5 + 29.9 P > 0.1 The numbers are the average counts of responses over four to five + + successive 2-min intervals. V 35.6 5.0 43.6 12.7 P > 0.1 The numbers are the average numbers of responses over four to five experiments the alien spots induced greater responses; the successive 2-min intervals (with standard deviation). Five indepen- difference was significant at the 99% level in two of the repli- dent experiments (I-V) were conducted, each with its own set of test cate experiments and significant at the 90% level in a third. papers. Similarly, the alien spots were inspected by a higher percentage of workers in all five replicate experiments, with the difference their own pheromones displayed the lesser amount of aversion, being significant at the 98% level in one. The differences in recruited nestmates more rapidly, and were ahead in the ter- responses to artificially applied spots were not as great as those ritorial battle at the end of the first 30 min. They responded in observed in the earlier experiments conducted with natural this manner even when (in five instances) the visual arrange- spots (see Table 1). This disparity probably resulted at least in ment was more familiar to their enemies than to themselves. part from tissue contaminants entering the rectal fluid when The probability that this result, which is consistent with earlier the sacs were removed and opened, even though the dissections observations, could have occurred by chance alone is only 1/ were conducted very carefully. The presence of such contam- 256. inants was indicated by the fact that artificially created spots DISCUSSION from nestmates caused a more hostile reaction than natural spots In Africa Oecophylla longinoda is one of the dominant ant from nestmates. However, uncertainty over the amount of species in forest canopies. Its colonies are exceptionally ag- contamination makes it impossible to decide whether the ter- gressive and territorial, tolerating almost no other ant species ritorial pheromone originates entirely from the rectal sac or is in the trees they occupy. They also exclude one another, in augmented in some way from materials originating else- aggressive interactions so severe as to create narrow, unoccupied where. corridors that are in effect "no-ant's land" (10). In recent studies When Oecophylla colonies engaged in territorial battles we have identified no less than five recruitment systems used during pilot experiments, the initial advantage went to the by 0. longinoda to explore, seize, and exploit new terrain, colony that was on its own territory. In order to test this im- most such thus far discov- pression and further to determine the sensory cues being used constituting the complex repertory by the ants themselves, we performed the following experi- ered in ants (9). The question therefore arises: does the use of ments. Two colonies were allowed to become thoroughly fa- territorial pheromones represent just one more peculiar adap- miliar with their own, separate arenas, and the major workers tation of this unusual species? Or-alternatively-does the were also permitted to mark the papered floors with anal spots behavior occur in other ant species but in less obvious forms? for a period of two or more days. The long axes of the two arenas Whatever the answer, the habit of depositing rectal fluid were set at right angles to each other. We then removed the uniformly is at the least unusual. Most ant species defecate at foragers overnight, and the following morning members of both kitchen middens or other confined areas away from the nest. colonies were allowed to enter one or the other of the two arenas The use of rectal material by 0. longinoda in its territorial simultaneously. Just before this step, however, the spatial ar- marking can thus be interpreted as a case of evolutionary rangement of the colonies and the test arena was changed so as ritualization, in which a previously existing behavior has been to give one colony or the other the advantage of prior familiarity modified to serve additionally in communication. This example with the visual cues, or pheromonal cues, or both kinds of cues. from the ants precisely parallels the modification of urination In four replicate experiments one or the other colony received and defecation by many mammalian species to mark home both cues, and in five other replicate experiments one colony ranges and territories. was given the visual cues and the other the pheromonal cues. We thank Kathleen M. Horton, Philip Lounibos, Ranka Sekulic, and In all nine cases the workers with the advantage of being with Robert E. Silberglied for collecting the Oecophylla colonies in Kenya. Downloaded by guest on September 25, 2021 Ecology: Holidobler and Wilson Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA 74 (1977) 2075

Our research has been supported by National Science Foundation pheromones of mice: species, strain and grouping effects," Anim. Grants BMS 75-06447 and BNS 73-00889. Behav. 22, 187-191. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the 5. Mykytowycz, R. (1968) "Territorial marking by rabbits," Sci. payment of page charges from funds made available to support the Am. 218, 116-126. research which is the subject of the article. This article must therefore 6. Peters, R. P. & Mech, L. D. (1975) "Scent-marking in wolves," be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U. S. C. Am. Sci. 63,628-637. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. 7. Hangartner, W., Reichson, J. M. & Wilson, E. 0. (1970) "Ori- entation to nest material by the ant, Pogonomyrmex badius (Latreille)," Anim. Behav. 18, 331-334. 1. Wilson, E. 0. (1975) Sociobiology: The New Synthesis (Belknap 8. Holldobler, B. (1976) "Recruitment behavior, home range ori- Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 256- entation and territoriality in harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex," 278. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1, 3-44. 2. Shorey, H. H. (1976) Animal Communication by Pheromones 9. Holldobler, B. & Wilson, E. 0. (1977) "Weaver ants: social es- (Academic Press, New York). tablishment and maintenance of territory," Science 195, 3. Mackintosh, J. H. (1973) "Factors affecting the recognition of 900-902. territory boundaries by mice (Mus musculus)," Anim. Behav. 10. Leston, D. (1971) "Ants, capsids and swollen shoot in Ghana: 21,464-470. interactions and the implications for control," Proc. 3rd Int. 4. Jones, R. B. & Nowell, N. W. (1974) "The urinary aversive Cocoa Res. Conf., Accra (Ghana) (1969), pp. 205-221. Downloaded by guest on September 25, 2021