Concept Note Refugees' Crisis in Greece
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Current Organization and Administration Situation of the Secondary Education Units in the North Aegean Region
ISSN 2664-4002 (Print) & ISSN 2664-6714 (Online) South Asian Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Abbreviated Key Title: South Asian Res J Human Soc Sci | Volume-1 | Issue-4| Dec -2019 | DOI: 10.36346/sarjhss.2019.v01i04.010 Original Research Article The Current Organization and Administration Situation of the Secondary Education Units in the North Aegean Region Dimitrios Ntalossis, George F. Zarotis* University of the Aegean, Faculty of Human Sciences, Rhodes, Greece *Corresponding Author Dr. George F. Zarotis Article History Received: 14.12.2019 Accepted: 24.12.2019 Published: 30.12.2019 Abstract: After analyzing various studies, we can conclude that the elements characterizing an effective school unit are leadership, teachers, and communication among school unit members, the climate of a school unit, school culture, the logistical infrastructure, the school's relationship with the local community, and the administrative system of the educational institution. The ultimate goal of this research is to detect the current organization and administration situation of secondary education units. In particular, to examine the concept of education, the school role and the concept of effective school, to identify the existing model of administration of the educational system, the organization and administration models of the school unit in which the respondents work, and furthermore the school culture level. The method adopted for the study is the classified cluster sampling method. According to this method, clusters are initially defined, which in this case are Secondary School Units. The clusters are then classified according to their characteristics, which in this case was the geographical feature: they all belonged to the North Aegean Region. -
The Ghikas House on Hydra: from Artists’ Haven to Enchanted Ruins
The Ghikas House on Hydra: From Artists’ Haven to Enchanted Ruins HELLE VALBORG GOLDMAN Norwegian Polar Institute We sat on the terrace under the starry sky and talked about poetry, we drank wine, we swam, we rode donkeys, we played chess—it was like life in a novel. (Ghikas, quoted in Arapoglou 56) Introduction The Greek island of Hydra has become known for the colony of expatriate painters and writers that became established there in the 1950s and 60s (Genoni and Dalziell 2018; Goldman 2018). Two ‘literary houses,’ the homes of several of the island’s most well-known foreign residents during that era—the Australian couple, writers George Johnston and Charmian Clift, and Canadian singer-songwriter Leonard Cohen—have become places of pilgrimage for aficionados of Australian literature and popular music. Visitors wend through the maze of car- less, stone-paved lanes, asking for directions along the way, in order to stand outside the objects of their quests. Standing in the small public courtyard in front of the Johnstons’ house, or the tight laneway fronting the Cohen house, there is not much to see—the houses are quiet, the doors closed, the stone and white-washed walls surrounding the properties, which are typical of Hydra, are high. This doesn’t keep people from coming. They can picture in their minds’ eyes what is on the other side of the walls, having seen photographs of the writers at work and leisure inside the houses, and having read the books and listened to the songs that were written while the Johnstons and Cohen were in residence. -
Greek Maritime History of the 18Th Century: a New Project
185 K ATERINA P A P A K ONSTANTINOU / A THENS Greek Maritime History of the 18th Century: A new project In a symposium organised in memory of Professor Gunnar Hering, I feel that it is most appropriate to discuss commerce and transport in the northern Balkans, for it is pertinent to my PhD thesis, initiated at the Institut für Byzantinistik und Neogräzistik. Exactly ten years ago, at the very beginning of my PhD course, it was Professor Gunnar Hering along with Professor Olga Katsiardi-Hering who suggested that I focus my research on a particu- lar collection of documents, preserved within the National Archives of Hungary, that concerned the activities of Greek merchants in the northern Balkans and Hungary in the second half of the eighteenth century.1 How- ever, after I completed my PhD I did not have the opportunity to continue my research on this subject, and, to my surprise, I changed the area of my research from the terrestrial to the maritime commerce. One may, of course, say that where the roads end the sea routes begin, and that commerce cannot be limited by borders of any kind. Products from the hinterland were carried on donkeys and horses to ports, wherefrom they were loaded on ships to be transported to other ports. In certain cases, traders had the opportunity to choose between the cara- van of donkeys and the ship as means of transport. Most interesting is the case of Ragusa/Dubrovnik, which until the early eighteenth century was the main port of export of the produce of the Balkans to Italy. -
Press Release
PRESS RELEASE «19o NAVIGATOR 2019 - THE SHIPPING DECISION MAKERS FORUM» Athens, 10th, December 2019 The 19th NAVIGATOR 2019 - THE SHIPPING DECISION MAKERS FORUM was organized by NAVIGATOR SHIPPING CONSULTANTS with great success on Friday, November 29, 2019 at the "Lighthouse" of the Stavros Niarchos Foundation Cultural Center. The response to the call to the maritime industry to #bepartofthechange was impressive with the participation of more than 600 including high- ranking stakeholders from the entire shipping spectrum – shipping executives, representatives from maritime organizations, journalists, Embassies, academics and students from Universities as well as from the Merchant Marine Academies of Oinousses, Hydra and Aspropyrgos. Danae Bezantakou, CEO of NAVIGATOR welcomed the participants underlining that this Navigator Forum 2019 is the result of discussions and meetings which took place on a monthly basis in collaboration with the Advisory Board, composed by most of sponsors and speakers of the Forum. The Advisory Board is the forerunner of a shipping think tank that pledged to be institutionalized with NAVIGATOR ASSEMBLY, which firstly was addressed to Shipowners of 1-15 ships. The results of the 8 discussion topics related to NEW REGULATIONS, SMART SHIPPING, HUMAN ELEMENT, LEGAL & INSURANCE, GREEN FINANCING, PORT STATE CONTROL, COMMERCIAL, SUPPLY CHAIN were presented during the forum by the respective moderators. The President of NAVIGATOR, Capt. Dimitris Bezantakos, was referred to the volatile period of the global shipping and economy, which creates a puzzle of strange social phenomena, such as terrorism and malicious acts on ships and installations, leading to a trampoline of oil prices. He also referred to the new regulations the problems that their implementation will cause and the major changes that are taking place in the tug- boats' market in Europe and beyond. -
Adoption Des Déclarations Rétrospectives De Valeur Universelle Exceptionnelle
Patrimoine mondial 40 COM WHC/16/40.COM/8E.Rev Paris, 10 juin 2016 Original: anglais / français ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L’ÉDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE CONVENTION CONCERNANT LA PROTECTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL, CULTUREL ET NATUREL COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL Quarantième session Istanbul, Turquie 10 – 20 juillet 2016 Point 8 de l’ordre du jour provisoire : Etablissement de la Liste du patrimoine mondial et de la Liste du patrimoine mondial en péril. 8E: Adoption des Déclarations rétrospectives de valeur universelle exceptionnelle RESUME Ce document présente un projet de décision concernant l’adoption de 62 Déclarations rétrospectives de valeur universelle exceptionnelle soumises par 18 États parties pour les biens n’ayant pas de Déclaration de valeur universelle exceptionnelle approuvée à l’époque de leur inscription sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial. L’annexe contient le texte intégral des Déclarations rétrospectives de valeur universelle exceptionnelle dans la langue dans laquelle elles ont été soumises au Secrétariat. Projet de décision : 40 COM 8E, voir Point II. Ce document annule et remplace le précédent I. HISTORIQUE 1. La Déclaration de valeur universelle exceptionnelle est un élément essentiel, requis pour l’inscription d’un bien sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial, qui a été introduit dans les Orientations devant guider la mise en oeuvre de la Convention du patrimoine mondial en 2005. Tous les biens inscrits depuis 2007 présentent une telle Déclaration. 2. En 2007, le Comité du patrimoine mondial, dans sa décision 31 COM 11D.1, a demandé que les Déclarations de valeur universelle exceptionnelle soient rétrospectivement élaborées et approuvées pour tous les biens du patrimoine mondial inscrits entre 1978 et 2006. -
Investment Profile of the Chios Island
Island of Chios - Investment Profile September 2016 Contents 1. Profile of the island 2. Island of Chios - Competitive Advantages 3. Investment Opportunities in the island 4. Investment Incentives 1. Profile of the island 2. Island of Chios - Competitive Advantages 3. Investment Opportunities in the island 4. Investment Incentives The island of Chios: Οverview Chios is one of the largest islands of the North East Aegean and the fifth largest in Greece, with a coastline of 213 km. It is very close to Asia Minor and lies opposite the Erythraia peninsula. It is known as one of the most likely birthplaces of the ancient mathematicians Hippocrates and Enopides. Chios is notable for its exports of mastic and its nickname is ”The mastic island”. The Regional Unit of Chios includes the islands of Chios, Psara, Antipsara and Oinousses and is divided into three municipalities: Chios, Psara and Oinouses. ➢ Area of 842.5 km² ➢ 5th largest of the Greek islands ➢Permanent population: ➢52.574 inhabitants (census 2011) including Oinousses and Psara ➢51.390 inhabitants (only Chios) Quick facts The island of Chios is a unique destination with: Cultural and natural sites • Important cultural heritage and several historical monuments • Rich natural environment of a unique diversity Archaeological sites: 5 • Rich agricultural land and production expertise in agriculture and Museums: 9 livestock production (mastic, olives, citrus fruits etc) Natura 2000 regions: 2 • RES capacity (solar, wind, hydro) Beaches: 45 • Great concentration in fisheries and aquaculture Source: http://www.chios.gr • Satisfactory infrastructure of transport networks (1 airport, 2 ports and road network) • Great history, culture and tradition in mercantile maritime, with hundreds of seafarers and ship owners Transport infrastructure Chios is served by one airport and two ports (Chios-central port and Mesta-port) and a satisfactory public road network. -
LESVOS LIMNOS AGIOS EFSTRATIOS CHIOS OINOUSSES PSARA SAMOS IKARIA FOURNOI 2 9 Verschiedene Welten
LESVOS LIMNOS AGIOS EFSTRATIOS CHIOS OINOUSSES PSARA SAMOS IKARIA FOURNOI 2 9 verschiedene Welten... Entdecken Sie sie!! REGIONALVERWALTUNG DER NORDÄGÄIS 1 Kountourioti Str., 81 100 Mytilini Tel.: 0030 22513 52100 Fax: 0030 22510 46652 www.pvaigaiou.gov.gr TOURISMUSBEHÖRDE Tel.: 0030 22510 47437 Fax: 0030 22510 47487 e-mail: [email protected] © REGIONALVERWALTUNG DER NORDÄGÄIS FOTOGRAFEN: Giorgos Depollas, Giorgos Detsis, Pantelis Thomaidis, Christos Kazolis, Giorgos Kakitsis, Andreas Karagiorgis, Giorgos Malakos, Christos Malahias, Viron Manikakis, Giorgos Misetzis, Klairi Moustafelou, Dimitris Pazaitis, Pantelis Pravlis, Giannis Saliaris, Kostas Stamatellis, Petros Tsakmakis, Giorgos Filios, Tolis Flioukas, Dimitris Fotiou, Tzeli Hatzidimitriou, Nikos Chatziiakovou 3 Inseln der Nordägäis Mehr als zweitausend kleine und große Inseln schmücken wie auf dem Meer schwimmende wertvolle Seerosen den Archipel Griechenlands. Im Nordostteil der Ägäis dominieren die Inseln: Limnos, Ai Stratis, Lesvos, Psara, Chios, Oinousses, Samos, Ikaria und Fournoi. Es sind besondere Inseln, auf denen die Geschichte eindringlich ihre Spuren hinterlassen hat, lebende Organismen eines vielseitigen kulturellen Wirkens, das sich in Volksfesten und Traditionen, darstellender und bildender Kunst, Produkten und Praktiken sowie in der Architektur des strukturierten Raumes ausdrückt. Die eigentümliche natürliche Umgebung und die wechselnden Landschaften heben die Inseln der Nordägäis hervor und führen den Besucher auf Entdeckungs- und Erholungspfade. Feuchtbiotope -
The Chios, Greece Earthquake of 23 July 1949: Seismological Reassessment and Tsunami Investigations
Pure Appl. Geophys. 177 (2020), 1295–1313 Ó 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02410-1 Pure and Applied Geophysics The Chios, Greece Earthquake of 23 July 1949: Seismological Reassessment and Tsunami Investigations 1 2 3,4 1 5 NIKOLAOS S. MELIS, EMILE A. OKAL, COSTAS E. SYNOLAKIS, IOANNIS S. KALOGERAS, and UTKU KAˆ NOG˘ LU Abstract—We present a modern seismological reassessment of reported by various agencies, but not included in the Chios earthquake of 23 July 1949, one of the largest in the Gutenberg and Richter’s (1954) generally authorita- Central Aegean Sea. We relocate the event to the basin separating Chios and Lesvos, and confirm a normal faulting mechanism tive catalog. This magnitude makes it the second generally comparable to that of the recent Lesvos earthquake largest instrumentally recorded historical earthquake located at the Northern end of that basin. The seismic moment 26 in the Central Aegean Sea after the 1956 Amorgos obtained from mantle surface waves, M0 ¼ 7 Â 10 dyn cm, makes it second only to the 1956 Amorgos earthquake. We compile event (Okal et al. 2009), a region broadly defined as all available macroseismic data, and infer a preference for a rupture limited to the South by the Cretan–Rhodos subduc- along the NNW-dipping plane. A field survey carried out in 2015 tion arc and to the north by the western extension of collected memories of the 1949 earthquake and of its small tsunami from surviving witnesses, both on Chios Island and nearby the Northern Anatolian Fault system. -
Opening Speech
II. National Symposium On The Aegean Islands, 2-3 July 2004, Gökçeada - Çanakkale OPENING SPEECH Ali KURUMAHMUT Prime Ministry of Navigation Counsellorship Marine Transportation General Manager The Aegean Sea lies between the Turkish and the Greek main lands, as well as between the Morea peninsular and the southwestern edges of the Anatolian coasts, with the extension of the islands of Çuha, Küçük Çuha, Girit, Kaşot, Kerpe and Rodos that constitute its outer natural boundaries. In terms of the geographical structure, the Aegean, a semi-closed sea, has geological and geo-morphological characteristics peculiar to itself: it has about 1800 islands, islets and rocks of various sorts, as well as a number of geographical formations, scattered al over the Sea. There is little wonder that all these characteristics make the Aegean Sea a special one. The Aegean dispute between Greece and Turkey has been complicated for a number of reasons: for instance, there are many islands in the Aegean that Turkey ceded to Greece through international treaties. And these islands lying in the natural extension of the Turkish mainland surround Anatolia from north to the south. But Athens makes claims of sovereignty over many islands, islets, and rocks though Ankara never ceded any of them to Greece officially. The most obvious and famous case would be the Kardak rocks crisis that erupted between Turkey and Greece at the beginning of 1996. These complications make the Aegean a sea that is of special importance among the seas of the world. It is possible to divide the Aegean Islands into five categories in terms of their geographical locations, geological and geo-morphological characteristics, the historical perspectives of the sovereign powers to which they belonged, the manner in which the sovereignty over them was determined through international treaties, as well as their importance for geo-political and strategic purposes. -
Greece): Results from Geomorphological Studies and Fission-Track Analysis
© Österreichische Geologische Gesellschaft/Austria; download unter www.geol-ges.at/ und www.biologiezentrum.at fission-track dating geomorphology palaeokarst neotectonics . Hellenides Cretaceous Palaeokarst and Cenozoic Erosion of the North Sporades (Greece): Results from Geomorphological Studies and Fission-Track Analysis EWALD HEJL1, HELMUT RIEDL2 AND HERBERT WEINGARTNER2 9 Figures and 2 Tables Content Zusammenfassung 67 Abstract .' 67 1. Introduction 68 2. Geological setting 68 3. Palaeokarst features 69 3.1 Bauxite karst and laterite karst 69 3.2 Preflysch karst 72 4. Neogene-Quaternary planation surfaces of Skopelos Island 72 4.1 Planation system A 72 4.2 Planation system B 72 4.3 Planation system C 72 4.4 Pediment system D 74 4.5 Coastal marginal pediment system E 74 5. Apatite fission-track analysis 74 6. Discussion of thermochronological data 75 7. Conclusions 81 8. Acknowledgements 81 References 81 Der kreidezeitliche Paläokarst und die känozoische Reliefgeschichte der Nordsporaden (Griechenland): Geomorphologische Befunde und Spaltspurenanalysen Zusammenfassung Die Reliefentwicklung der Magnesischen Inseln (Nordsporaden) wurde anhand geomorphologischer Geländebeobachtungen auf Skopelos und mittels Spaltspurdatierungen an Gesteinen von Skiathos, Skopelos und Alonnisos untersucht. Die gemessenen Spaltspuralter und modellierten Abkühlpfade weisen auf regionale und zeitliche Schwankungen der posteozänen Abtragungsgeschwindigkeiten hin. Zwei präeozäne Generationen von Paläokarst sind auf Skopelos zu beobachten. Die erste entwickelte sich während der Unterkreide auf triadischen Dolomiten des alten pelagonischen Schelfs. Die Bauxite und Laterite, mit denen dieser Palaeokarst versiegelt ist, sind aus verschwemmtem Material der Eohellenischen Decke hervorgegangen. Eine zweite Generation von Paläokarst entwickelte sich auf oberkretazi- schen Rudistenkalken und wurde unter palaeogenem Flysch begraben. Drei Generationen neogener Verflachungen treten auf Skopelos oberhalb von 300 m Seehöhe auf. -
The Geodynamics of the Aegean and Anatolia: Introduction
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 27, 2021 The geodynamics of the Aegean and Anatolia: introduction T. TAYMAZ1, Y. YILMAZ2 & Y. DILEK3 1Department of Geophysical Engineering,˙ Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, TR–34469,˙ Istanbul, Turkey (e-mail: [email protected]) 2Kadir Has University, Fatih, I˙stanbul, Turkey 3Department of Geology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA The complexity of the plate interactions and and volcanism in Anatolia and the Aegean region associated crustal deformation in the Eastern (Taymaz et al. 2004). Mediterranean region is reflected in many destruc- tive earthquakes that have occurred throughout Regional synthesis its recorded history, many of which are well documented and intensively studied. The Eastern Given its location in the Alpine–Himalayan Mediterranean region, including the surrounding orogenic belt, and at the collisional boundary areas of western Turkey and Greece, is indeed one between Gondwana and Laurasia, the geological of the most seismically active and rapidly deform- history of the Aegean region and Anatolia involves ing regions within the continents (Fig. 1). Thus, the Mesozoic–Cenozoic closure of several Neo- the region provides a unique opportunity to tethyan oceanic basins, continental collisions and improve our understanding of the complexities of subsequent post-orogenic processes (e.g. Sengo¨r continental tectonics in an actively collisional & Yılmaz 1981; Bozkurt & Mittwede 2001; Okay orogen. The major scientific observations from et al. 2001; Dilek & Pavlides 2006; Robertson & this natural laboratory have clearly been helping Mountrakis 2006). The opening of oceanic branches us to better understand the tectonic processes in of Neotethys commenced in the Triassic and active collision zones, the mode and nature of they closed during the Late Cretaceous to Eocene continental growth, and the causes and distribution time interval. -
Network Biogeography of a Complex Island System: the Aegean
Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2016) ORIGINAL Network biogeography of a complex ARTICLE island system: the Aegean Archipelago revisited Konstantinos Kougioumoutzis1,2*, Anna Thalassini Valli1, Elisavet Georgopoulou3, Stylianos Michail Simaiakis4, Kostas A. Triantis2 and Panayiotis Trigas1 1Laboratory of Systematic Botany, Faculty of ABSTRACT Crop Science, Agricultural University of Aim The Aegean Archipelago has been the focal research area for identifying Athens, GR-118 55 Athens, Greece, 2 and testing several ecological and evolutionary patterns, yet its biogeographical Department of Ecology & Systematics, Faculty of Biology, National & Kapodistrian subdivision has been somewhat overlooked, with the processes driving the University of Athens, GR-157 03 Athens, assembly of the Aegean island plant communities still remaining largely Greece, 3Geological-Paleontological unclear. To bridge this gap, we identify the biogeographical modules (highly Department, Natural History Museum, 1010 linked subgroups of islands and plant taxa) within the Aegean Archipelago. 4 Vienna, Austria, Natural History Museum of Location The Aegean Archipelago, Greece. Crete, University of Crete, Heraklion GR- 71409 Crete, Greece Methods We used a network approach to detect island biogeographical roles and modules, based on a large and detailed database including 1498 Aegean endemic and subendemic plant taxa distributed on 59 Aegean Islands and five adjacent mainland areas. Results The Aegean was divided into six biogeographical modules; the net- work was significantly modular. None of the modules displayed all four possi- ble biogeographical roles (connectors, module hubs, network hubs, peripherals). Six new biogeographical regions in the Aegean were identified. Main conclusions The borders of the six biogeographical regions in the Aegean correspond well to the region’s palaeogeographical evolution from the middle Miocene to the end of the Pleistocene.