Notice of Motion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Report Number: C2019-1468 Meeting: Combined Meeting of Council Meeting Date: 2019 November 18 NOTICE OF MOTION RE: Golf Course Operations Request for Proposal Sponsoring Councillor(s): Ward Sutherland, Jeff Davison, Jyoti Gondek, Peter Demong, Diane Colley Urquhart, Shane Keating, George Chahal, Ray Jones, Joe Magliocca, Sean Chu, Jeromy Farkas WHEREAS municipal golf courses have been part of the recreational and cultural landscape of Calgary for the last 104 years; AND WHEREAS The City of Calgary, through the Golf Course Operations (GCO) division of Calgary Recreation, operates seven municipal golf courses, with 90 holes and three driving ranges at five locations; AND WHEREAS until 2012, GCO was self-supporting in both operating and capital with revenues funding all direct operating costs as well as an annual $200 thousand mill-rate contribution; AND WHEREAS operational and capital funding challenges resulted in ongoing tax support from 2012 to present; AND WHEREAS operationally, there has been an emerging concern as result of a disconnect between prevailing market and public sector wages; AND WHEREAS contracting out the management of golf operations may offer the opportunity to bring operational salaries and wages in line with the prevailing market and reduce or eliminate the tax support required by the City of Calgary; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Council: 1. Direct Administration to develop a Request For Proposal (RFP) and go to market to secure a long-term management contract for the operations and service provision of all City of Calgary golf courses. 2. Direct Administration to develop a scope of work to deliver an RFP to the market and report back to Council through. the SPC on Community and Protective Services no later than early Q1 2020 with a timeline and funding recommendation required to create, administer and evaluate and RFP process. CITY OF CALGARY RECEIVED IN COUNCIL CHAMBER NOV 1 8 2019 ITEM:~ ']lv'o\,c... A)iji,?tr:, wu:\:!p~ CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT ISC: Protected Page 1 of 1 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Ward Boundary Review Stakeholder Report Back: What We Heard 2020 May 28
C2020-0638 Attachment 5 Ward Boundary Review Stakeholder Report Back: What We Heard 2020 May 28 Project overview Ward boundary changes are governed by the Municipal Government Act and the Ward Boundary Determination and Review Policy (the Policy). As part of its review of ward boundaries, The Returning Officer determined that Wards 3, 7 and 12 have population deviations and Ward 5 has an elector count deviation inconsistent with the Policy. Council directed the Returning Officer to conduct a minor review of ward boundaries and will include public engagement on proposed changes to be considered by Council. Engagement overview The purpose of the public engagement is to gather input from Calgarians to inform the Returning Officer’s independent recommendations to Council on proposed ward boundary changes. The engagement started on 2020 February 19 and ended on 2020 April 3. The majority of feedback was collected online through the engage website, and through a direct email address and in-person events. In addition, the Calgary Catholic School District and Calgary School Board were engaged and individual trustees were invited to provide their input online through the engage website. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the final in-person event was cancelled; however ten in-person events were completed prior and the online opportunity was extended by 15 days. Additional email follow up with all community associations was undertaken to encourage online participation. There were two (2) proposed scenarios developed for feedback based on the Ward Boundary Determination and Review Policy. The Policy directs The Returning Officer to consider criteria from the Ward Boundary Determination and Review Policy.
[Show full text]
2019-2020 City Hall School Report to Partners
2019-2020 City Hall School Report to Partners Students explore the East Village model at the East Village Experience Centre In partnership with: “I feel more connected to my city and more in the know. I definitely get the process a lot more as well as how the people within the government work and their effect on local citizens.” ~ Grade 5 student Students find hidden murals in Chinatown Exploring the city This year at City Hall School, students have explored downtown from St. Patrick’s Island on the east side to the Beltline murals on the west side. They have investigated community while looking at “Bridge” by Katie Green. Students visualized in the +15 Soundscape at Arts Commons. They have observed old buildings on Stephen Avenue, building construction of Platform Calgary, and how people used the upgraded underpasses. Each class came to City Hall School with a big idea that could be questions or thoughtful quotes. Two years ago, Journalling in the new Central Library there was a focus on public art and last year, classes were interested in sustainability and the natural world. This year, the main themes were being an active and responsible citizen as well as how to think in an innovative way. This year ended with an unexpected change. Due to the pandemic, all schools were closed in the middle of March. This led to many classes missing their chance to come to City Hall School. Fortunately, these classes are able to come during the 2020-2021 school year. How does City Hall School work? City Hall School is a five-day field study that is jointly run by The City of Calgary’s Calgary Neighbourhoods business unit and Campus Calgary/Open Minds.
[Show full text]
Gift Registry 2020 Circumstance Date of Report Name
Gift Registry 2020 Circumstance Date of Report Name of Member of Council Gift Recipients(s) Ward # Estimated value Date Received Source of Gift/Benefit Telus Spark General Admission Passes (20) 1/14/2020 Ward Sutherland Ward 1 Constituents 01 $520 1/14/2020 Telus Spark President's Summit- Full Day Honoraria 4/17/2020 Ward Sutherland Ward Sutherland 01 $325 1/23/2020 Alberta Urban Municipalities Association Board of Directors Dinner Meeting Honoraria 4/17/2020 Ward Sutherland Ward Sutherland 01 $80 1/23/2020 Alberta Urban Municipalities Association Board of Directors Meeting- Full Day Honoraria 4/17/2020 Ward Sutherland Ward Sutherland 01 $325 1/24/2020 Alberta Urban Municipalities Association 6 hours Travel Honoraria 4/17/2020 Ward Sutherland Ward Sutherland 01 $240 1/24/2020 Alberta Urban Municipalities Association Infrastructure & Energy Committee Meeting Honoraria- Full Day 4/17/2020 Ward Sutherland Ward Sutherland 01 $325 2/7/2020 Alberta Urban Municipalities Association 6 hours Travel Honoraria 4/17/2020 Ward Sutherland Ward Sutherland 01 $240 2/7/2020 Alberta Urban Municipalities Association Board of Directors Meeting- Full Day Honoraria 4/17/2020 Ward Sutherland Ward Sutherland 01 $325 2/27/2020 Alberta Urban Municipalities Association 6 hours Travel Honoraria 4/17/2020 Ward Sutherland Ward Sutherland 01 $240 2/27/2020 Alberta Urban Municipalities Association Infrastructure & Energy Committee Mtg- Full Day H 4/17/2020 Ward Sutherland Ward Sutherland 01 $325.00 4/3/2020 Alberta Urban Municipalities Association Calgary Human Society Event 2/25/2020 Joe Magliocca Greg H. 02 Unknown 1/21/2020 Calgary Humane Society Lunch Meeting 2/19/2020 Joe Magliocca Joe Magliocca 02 $40 1/23/2020 Shane Homes 9th Annual Calgary Leaders Dinner 2020 2/25/2020 Joe Magliocca Greg H.
[Show full text]
Attendance Tracking for Mayor and Council, PFC2020-0210
Item # 8.2.1 Report Number: PFC2020-0210 Meeting: Priorities & Finance Committee Meeting Date: 2020 February 11 NOTICE OF MOTION RE: Attendance Tracking for Mayor and Council, PFC2020-0210 Sponsoring Councillor(s): Jeromy Farkas, Peter Demong, Sean Chu, and Joe Magliocca WHEREAS… 1. Under Section 153(c) of the Alberta Municipal Government Act, one of the general duties of municipal councillors is to participate in council meetings and council committee meetings and meetings of other bodies to which they are appointed; 2. Preparation, participation, attendance, and voting at meetings on behalf of their constituents is a fundamental democratic expectation and requirement of City Council members; 3. Adequate attendance at meetings of Council allow for consistent, good quality, collective decision making; 4. Council has experienced several committee meetings which have failed to start due to lack of quorum, a meeting that has been lost due to lack of quorum, and extended periods of bare quorum; 5. Council members are often required to be conducting City business at multiple places at the same time, and such absences should be clearly accounted for; 6. It is good governance to review Council policies and practices from time to time; 7. In the past, citizen and advocacy groups have initiated efforts to track and report on the attendance of elected officials; 8. It is in the public’s interest that the attendance record of Council members be disclosed by impartial staff, rather than rely on third party organizations to perform that work; 9. Council has implemented cost effective reporting on matters of public interest, such as disclosure of gifts received and office visitors; 10.
[Show full text]
Lives Lost in 2017 (Pg
the FREE November 23, 2017 reflector www.TheReflector.ca Sofía Mailén Santillán, A. Villegas, Cindy Crawford Revlon, Pamela Tabarez, Eyelen, Juninho da Mangueira, Paola Bracho, Michele Rios, Patricia Araujo not reported, Dandara, Name unknown, M. Dias Machado, Will Rhillary Silva, Name unknown, R. da Silva de Sá, G. Aquino de Godoy, D. de Souza, J. R. T. Gomes, Gabriel Gomes, F. Braz, Paula Raio Laser 50, Jake Helen, Flávia Victoria Lima, L. C. Marinho, W. H. Soares dos Santos 16, Mierala da Silva, Moranguinho, Agatha Lios, Sandra, Lady Dyana, J. A. dos Santos, Paola Oliveira, Name unknown, Agatha Mont, Name unknown, Dandara dos Santos, Name unknown, A. da Silva Maciel, Mirella de Castro, Camila de Souza Magalhães, Emanuelle Muniz, Lorrane, Z. Marrocos, Michelly Garcia, Name unknown, Rubi, Sandra, Jennifer Celia Henrique (Jenni), Name unknown, Lexia, Camila Albuquerque, Bruninha, Paola, Paulina, Uilca or Wilka, Name unknown, Name unknown, R. Félix da Silva, Bianka Gonçalves, Camila, Vitoria Castro, Hérica Izidório, Name unknown, Gaby, Name unknown, Samilly Guimarães, Marooni, A. Ribeiro Marcossone, Eloá Silva, Name unknown, Uilca, Layza Mello, Name unknown, Samaielly, Sophia Castro, C. A. Lima da Silva, R. C. Silva Pereira, Thadeu Nascimento, Jennifer, Fernanda, Chaiane, Ketlin, Name unknown, Name unknown, Pâmela, Lalá, Grace Kelly, Joyce Jane Padilha, Sheila Medeiros, Laryrssa Moura, Natasha, A. Alves Nascimento, Natasha, Name unknown, Renata Vieira, E. Shyne, Julhão Petruk, Name unknown, Bárbara, Name unknown, Camily Victoria, Denise, C. Barroso de Oliveira, Nicolly Santos, Ney Oliveira, Salomé Bracho, Tabata Brandão, Carla, Lola, Rayane, Larissa, Vicky Spears, Anna Sophia, Bruna dos Santos, Cauã, Thalia, Sophia, Michele, Leona Albuquerque, Camila Guedes, Gil Pereia da Costa, Gabriela Sousa, E.
[Show full text]
Standing Policy Committee on Transportation and Transit P.O
Standing Policy Committee on Transportation and Transit P.O. Box 2100, Station M 700 Macleod Trail South Calgary AB T2P 2M5 Re: Mount Royal University Faculty and Staff for SW BRT 18 July 2016 Dear Transportation and Transit Committee: Last week the Students' Association of Mount Royal University submitted a four-page letter offering their "unequivocal support" for the construction of the SW BRT line which will bring better transit to the Mount Royal campus. As SAMRU noted in their letter, "To have this project face further delays or even cancellation would, in our view, be a gross disservice to the students, faculty and staff of Mount Royal University." We, as Faculty and Staff at Mount Royal University, not only recognize the positive impacts this project will offer to our campus community, but also the benefits it will have for the thousands in our city who rely on public transit in their daily lives. By adding our names as supporters of the SW BRT, we are speaking out in solidarity with our students and adding our voices to the call for better transit for all Calgarians. 1. Lloyd Ash 21. Lee Easton 2. Mark Ayyash 22. Mohammed El Hazzouri 3. Monica Baehr 23. Shawn England 4. Sarah Banting 24. Lexie Farmer 5. Katharine Barrette 25. MaryAnn Farebrother 6. Tamarea Bauer 26. David Finch 7. Heather Bensler 27. Susan Garrow-Oliver 8. David A Bird 28. Alex Graham 9. Bonnie Blankert 29. Liam Haggarty 10. Susan Boland 30. Kim Halvorson 11. Rob Boschman 31. Leah Hamilton 12. Meagan Bowler 32. Sally Haney 13.
[Show full text]
2019 City of Calgary/CSEC Event Centre Agreement Fact Sheet
#321, 3132 – 26th Street N.E. Calgary, Alberta T1Y 6Z1 Phone: (403) 262-2390 Fax: (403) 262 2408 E-mail: [email protected] / www.thecdlc.ca 2019 City of Calgary/CSEC Event Centre Agreement Fact Sheet The City of Calgary and the Calgary Sports and Entertainment Corporation (CSEC) last came to lagerheads over the construction of a new arena complex during the 2017 municipal election, when Ken King and the Calgary Flames organization seemed to go all-in on mayoral hopeful Bill Smith’s candidacy. The proposal then, as the $1.8-billion CalgaryNEXT debacle proposed as a revitalization vanity project in the creosote-tainted West Village did before it, died as a result of hefty corporate demands made on City contributions. Now, the City has commited to front half the costs of the new “event centre” totaling around $275-million. This comes at a time when the City will cut $60-million in operational spending on essential services including fire, policing, transit, among dozens of other programs. The City is slated to retain full ownership of the new facility, putting it on the hook for any structural repair costs over the facility’s lifecycle, while CSEC is tasked with operational, maintenance, and repair costs on the 35-year cost-sharing agreement. CSEC will retain a vast majority of the revenue, while the City will extract smaller fees/rents from the facility over its lifecycle. Here is the breakdown of City cost incurment, revenue projections, cost overrun liability, and other known figures associated with the project. Facts: - Estimated Direct Return on Investment for the City and CMLC: negative $28.9- million.
[Show full text]
2018 Councillor Gift Registry by Ward
Gift Registry 2018 Circumstance Date of Report Name of Member of CouncGift Recipients(s) Ward # Estimated value Date Received Source of Gift/Benefit Alberta Urban Municipalities Association Honoraria 7/18/2018 Ward Sutherland Ward Sutherland Board of Directors Meeting 01 $285 1/25/2018 Alberta Urban Municipalities Association Alberta Urban Municipalities Association Honoraria 7/18/2018 Ward Sutherland Ward Sutherland Travel 01 $140 1/25/2018 Alberta Urban Municipalities Association All Seniors Care Gift Box (T‐Shirt, Coffee Mug, Key Chain, Hot Chocolate) 2/5/2018 Ward Sutherland Ward Sutherland 01 $20 2/5/2018 Sage Hill Retirement Residence Lunch 4/19/2018 Ward Sutherland Ward Sutherland 01 Unknown 2/7/2018 ISL Engineering and Land Services Ltd. The Association of Professional Engineers and APEGA Luncheon 4/19/2018 Ward Sutherland Ward Sutherland 01 Unknown 2/15/2018 Geoscientists of Alberta (APEGA) Annual Dinner Reception 4/19/2018 Ward Sutherland Ward Sutherland and Guest 01 Unknown 3/3/2018 Manu Chugh Architect Ltd. St. Patrick's Day Event 4/19/2018 Ward Sutherland Ward Sutherland 01 Unknown 3/16/2018 Boyden Lunch 4/19/2018 Ward Sutherland Ward Sutherland 01 Unknown 3/26/2018 Genstar Calgary Zoo Passes (25) 7/18/2018 Ward Sutherland Local Charities & Community Members 01 Unknown 4/9/2018 Calgary Zoo Che Malambo Concert 4/19/2018 Ward Sutherland Ward Sutherland and Guest 01 Unknown 4/10/2018 Arts Commons Ward Sutherland Investment Advisory Alberta Urban Municipalities Association Honoraria 7/18/2018 Ward Sutherland Committee 01 $285
[Show full text]
OCT 2020 FINAL.Indd
CPC leader Should Speculation, O’Toole pro-lifers not science, declares “I’m hide their is destroying pro-choice” religion? liberty p. 2 p. 5 p. 7 $5.00 Canada’s Life and Family Newspaper October 2020, Vol. XXXVII No.7 The choice p. 4, 8 www.theinterim.com PAGE 2 — THE INTERIM, OCTOBER 2020 Socons Erin O’Toole and and the CPC the direction of the CPC Paul Tuns terms of total votes, the two life candidates dropped off free votes for MPs. We’ll wait Analysis socially liberal candidates the ballot.” and see: nearly every lead- had more points. O’Toole, This is not the first time ership contender promises On August 24, Erin O’Toole based on his strength in this has happened. Andrew free votes for caucus. Few won the Conservative Party Quebec, where there are 75 Scheer won in 2017 because actually follow through on of Canada leadership, most- ridings but relatively fewer of down-ballot support he that promise. ly on the strength of support members (about 13,000 of received from Brad Trost Debates and votes are as a second- or third-choice the party’s 270,000), kept and Pierre Lemieux vot- meaningless, however, if of pro-life and other socially him in contention. ers. Scheer would not have pro-life MPs and the socially or all the post-election hand-wringing about whether conservative members of the As Campaign Life won if the pro-life stalwarts conservative base, are not Fsocial conservatism was, in the words of Peter MacKay, party who voted for Derek Coalition noted in its lead- had not signed up so many allowed to win policy argu- the “stinking albatross” that cost Andrew Scheer Canada’s Sloan and Leslyn Lewis.
[Show full text]
II "."""""" 'SIR",,,,> the CITY of CALGARY II J 9/0612015
19/0612015 CITY OF CALGARY RECEIVED IN ~~~---+--------------------------------,-, Gas, Power and Telecommunications Strategic Planning Session 2015 June 22 C2015-0543 CALGARY". Acronyms • GPT - Gas, Power and Telecommunications Committee • AUC - Alberta Utilities Commission • UCA - Utility Consumer Advocate • MCAA - Municipal Consent and Access Agreements • RRO - Regulated Rate Option (regulated price for electricity) • GCFR - Gas Cost Flow-through Rate • ROW's - Rights-of-Way • CRTC - Canadian Radio-television Committee • FCM - Federation of Canadian Municipalities • ILECS - Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier • CLEC - Competitive Local Exchange Carrier • TUC - Transportation Utility Corridor Pago 2 II "."""""" _'SIR",,,,> THE CITY Of CALGARY II J 9/0612015 Purpose of Strategic Planning Session • Provide awareness of what GPT does: Utility regulation Oversight of Franchise Fees Municipal Consent and Access Agreements • Telecommunications Page 3 0>0,,,,,,, II II "'" _ES_TEO THE CITY OF CALGARY Calgary's GPT Committee • Started in 1971 to provide Council with the ability to take action on regulated utility issues. • GPT is unique in Canada and benefits The City and Calgarians • Mandate: To participate in regulatory proceedings as necessary to protect the interests of The City. • Council determines what is in The City's interest Utility Consumer Advocate cannot fully represent City's interests PIge4 c,.,,,,"', II II OS< U"'ESTR,mD THF CITY OF CALGARY 2 1910612015 Gas, Power and Telecommunications Committee • Chair Councillor Andre Chabot •
the CITY of CALGARY II J 9/0612015" class="panel-rg color-a">[Show full text]
Community Belletin, July 6, 2013
Community Bulletin July 6, 2013 ***Please note that the meeting on July 11th has been rescheduled. The next community association meeting will be on Wednesday July 10th, at the Foothills Mennonite Church, 6:30-8:30 p.m., Sanctuary.*** Please send your written comments to Council by July 10th, 2013. Email: [email protected]. More details below. Summary of Resident Concerns Attached to this community Bulletin is a three page brief of Resident Concerns that will be sent to Mayor Nenshi and each Alderman of Council. The brief can also be used as a resource for residents to help prepare their written submissions to Council or help with presentations to Council on July 22/23/24. How to Submit to Council (Please submit by July 10th, 2013!!!!) Submissions must be made before July 11, 2013 at 10:00am. So effectively the deadline is July 10, 2013. Do not wait until the last minute to send your comments!!!! Submissions can be made using one of these methods: In person and by mail: Due to the floods, a temporary office of the City Clerk’s has changed. Temporary Office of the City Clerk, The City of Calgary 4th Floor, 1212 - 31st Ave. N.E. Calgary, Alberta T2E 7S8 By e-mail: [email protected] and please send a copy to [email protected] We also encourage you to contact your individual Alderman. More information on City Council can be found at http://www.calgary.ca/General/Pages/Calgary-City-Council.aspx Below is a list of City Council with email addresses: Mayor Naheed Nenshi [email protected] Ward 1 Dale Hodges [email protected]
[Show full text]
The Development Industry and City Council Roll Call Votes in Calgary by Janine Giles and Paul Fairie1
The Development Industry and City Council Roll Call Votes in Calgary By Janine Giles and Paul Fairie1 THIS IS A DRAFT. PLEASE DO NOT CITE WITHOUT PERMISSION. Calgary is a city known for its expansive suburban development. At the same time, the development industry is hypothesized by political economists to have significant influence over city decision making. Using roll call votes, campaign finance data, census data and a publicly available video where the development industry candidly discusses their assessment of city council members, it is possible to analyze the structuring role of donations from developers on city council decisions, and the capacity of the development industry to assess the structure of city council voting blocs. We find that developer donations have a structuring role for council decision making, and find considerable evidence that the development industry has a accurate evaluation of city council decision making. Of all the leaked videos concerning municipal ber 2010 to April 2013 and ward-level characteris- politics released in 2013, a video of developers, tics drawn from various censuses, we test competing meeting in private to plan a co-ordinated e↵ort to accounts of municipal power structures. We find gain 8 favourable votes on city council in Calgary that urban growth machine theory, which sees de- (Geddes 2013), might not have been the most inter- velopers actively influencing city council decisions, nationally salacious, but it is the most theoretically provides the most compelling account of the Cal- revelent to the literature on municipal political sci- gary power structure. ence. It is often proved difficult to empirically test the relationship between the development industry and City Council.
[Show full text]