DOCSLIB.ORG

Margaret S. Archer Editor Morphogenesis and the Crisis of Normativity Morphogenesis and the Crisis of Normativity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Margaret S. Archer Editor Morphogenesis and the Crisis of Normativity Morphogenesis and the Crisis of Normativity Social Morphogenesis Margaret S. Archer Editor Morphogenesis and the Crisis of Normativity Morphogenesis and the Crisis of Normativity [email protected] Social Morphogenesis Series Editor: MARGARET S. ARCHER Centre for Social Ontology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK Aims and scope: To focus upon ‘social morphogenesis’ as a general process of change is very different from examining its particular results over the last quarter of a century. This series ventures what the generative mechanisms are that produce such intense change and discusses how this differs from late modernity. Contributors examine if an intensification of morphogenesis (positive feedback that results in a change in social form) and a corresponding reduction in morphostasis (negative feedback that restores or reproduces the form of the social order) best captures the process involved. The series consists of 5 volumes derived from the Centre for Social Ontology’s annual workshops “From Modernity to Morphogenesis” at the University of Lausanne, headed by Margaret Archer. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/11959 [email protected] Margaret S. Archer Editor Morphogenesis and the Crisis of Normativity 123 [email protected] Editor Margaret S. Archer Centre for Social Ontology University of Warwick Coventry, UK This volume IV follows the book “Social Morphogenesis”, edited by Margaret S. Archer, which was the first book in the series published in 2013 http://www.springer.com/social+ sciences/book/978-94-007-6127-8, the volume “Late Modernity”, edited by Margaret S. Archer, published in 2014 and the volume “Generative Mechanisms Transforming the Social Order”, edited by Margaret S. Archer, published in 2015. ISSN 2198-1604 ISSN 2198-1612 (electronic) Social Morphogenesis ISBN 978-3-319-28438-5 ISBN 978-3-319-28439-2 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-28439-2 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016939118 © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. Printed on acid-free paper This Springer imprint is published by Springer Nature The registered company is Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland [email protected] Independent Social Research Foundation With thanks to the ISRF for its ongoing funding of the Centre for Social Ontology under whose auspices this annual volume of the Book Series on Social Morphogen- esis is published v [email protected] [email protected] Contents 1 Introduction: Does Social Morphogenesis Threaten the Rule of Law? ............................................................ 1 Margaret S. Archer Part I The Great Normative Transformations 2 The Great Normative Changes of the Twentieth Century ............. 31 Douglas Porpora 3 Reflexive Secularity: Thoughts on the Reflexive Imperative in a Secular Age ............................................... 49 Philip S. Gorski 4 Emergence, Development and Death: Norms in International Society .................................................... 69 Colin Wight 5 The Normative Texture of Morphogenic Society: Tensions, Challenges, and Strategies ................................................. 87 Andrea M. Maccarini Part II Morphogenesis and the Decline of Normative Consensus 6 In Letter and in Spirit: Social Morphogenesis and the Interpretation of Codified Social Rules ......................... 113 Ismael Al-Amoudi 7 Anormative Social Regulation: The Attempt to Cope with Social Morphogenesis ................................................ 141 Margaret S. Archer vii [email protected] viii Contents 8 Joint ‘Anormative’ Regulation from Status Inconsistency: A Multilevel Spinning Top Model of Specialized Institutionalization ......................................................... 169 Emmanuel Lazega 9 The Fragile Movements of Late Modernity.............................. 191 Mark Carrigan Part III Morphogenesis and What Makes for Changes in Normativity 10 The Relational Understanding of the Origin and Morphogenetic Change of Social Morality ......................... 219 Pierpaolo Donati 11 Collective Practices and Norms ........................................... 249 Tony Lawson 12 Ethics from Systems: Origin, Development and Current State of Normativity ........................................................ 279 Wolfgang Hofkirchner [email protected] Chapter 1 Introduction: Does Social Morphogenesis ThreatentheRuleofLaw? Margaret S. Archer The Problem Do shared values promote social stability and social integration, or is it the other way round? Is it rather that social stability fosters normative consensus about the legitimacy of the rule of law, the appropriateness of prevailing rules and attachment to existing conventions? This question has a long history in the philosophy of law and the sociology of development, whose respective thinkers often took different positions during the Twentieth century. What they did agree upon was that the lack of social change was conducive to both an unchallenged rule of law and to shared values embedded in established custom and common beliefs. In short, morphostasis was the precondition of a harmonious relationship between legal validity and normative consensus in society – whichever way round it was held to work. When novel practices become rife – at work, in the family, through geographical mobility, a multinational global economy and the digitalization of the life-world in general – is it possible to establish a new corpus of laws, norms and rules, given that intense morphogenesis denies the durability of any new stable context? This spells a crisis for normative regulation, for social integration and for social stability alike, which is the theme of this volume. These three factors, ‘social normativity’, ‘social integration’ and ‘social regu- lation’ (NIR)1 are ineluctably interdependent. What legal philosophers and social 1This is a specific instance of the more general maxim SAC, where adequate explanations need to make reference to Structure, Culture and Agency. Here N D C, I D AandRD S. M.S. Archer () Centre for Social Ontology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK e-mail: [email protected] © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 1 M.S. Archer (eds.), Morphogenesis and the Crisis of Normativity, Social Morphogenesis, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-28439-2_1 [email protected] 2 M.S. Archer theorists can differ about (though this is not always the case) is which of the three has causal primacy, if any.2 In the beginning, what was always the case in both disciplines was joint endorsement of the imperative: ‘NIR must cohere’. As social change increased and intensified throughout the twentieth century, fundamentally NIR came apart in the two sets of hands. A critique of this ‘fragmentation’ is what basically unites the contributions to the present volume. They can be read partly as diagnoses of the loss of NIR as morphostasis gave way to morphogenesis, and partly as prognoses about the possibility of its restoration in morphogenic society. Legal Validity and Social Solidarity: Their Common Anchorage in Normativity Law is not true or false but ‘valid’ or ‘invalid’ and social solidarity is not true or false but rather existent or non-existent. In both cases, the task for theorists was similar: to establish upon what legal ‘validity’ and social ‘solidarity’ turned, that is, what accounted for their bindingness? The answers were not dissimilar until the period with which we deal, roughly 1980 onwards. In shorthand, the joint response was ‘shared normativity’, or what I once called ‘The Myth of Cultural Integration’ (Archer 1985), fostered by the early anthropologists, i.e. a common cultural conspectus amongst those sharing much the same life, resources and knowledge as one another. In this respect, Parsons and Kelsen can be considered as twin giants who placed the same holistic importance on shared normativity as the apriorifor social solidarity as for legal validity. On the one hand, Parsons’ elaborate theory, built by climbing on Durkheim’s shoulders, retained as its corner stone the necessity of shared normativity in any functioning social unit. However, this ceased to be problematic within his ‘normative functionalism’ – unlike the ‘pathologies of the division of labour’ that had so exercised Durkheim and prompted him to emphasise the urgency of remedial measures in the form of practical social policy interventions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNIT SYLLABUS TEACHER's NAME CREDIT CLASS UNIT-1 Philosophy
    SYLLABUS DISTRIBUTION DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY SEMESTER-V (DSE) COURSE CODE- PHIL-G-DSE-T-1A COURSE CONTENT PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION UNIT WISE DIVISION TOTAL CREDITS-66 WEEK ASSIGNED-17(66 TEACHING DAYS) UNIT SYLLABUS TEACHER’S CREDIT NAME CLASS UNIT-1 Philosophy of Religion : Nature and Concern S.P 16 UNIT-2 Arguments for and against the Existence of God (Indian S.P 18 and Western) UNIT-3 Reason and Faith : Jñāna and Bhakti R.M 16 UNIT-4 Religious Pluralism R.M 16 Recommended Readings:- • Bhagvat Gītā: Relevant Chapters • Galloway: Philosophy of Religion • John Hick: Philosophy of Religion • Brian Davies: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion • James Churchill & Davids V. Jones: An Introductory Reader in the Philosophy of Religion • D.A. Trueblood: Philosophy of Religion • Chemparathy: Indian Rational Theology ( This book contains an English Translation of Udayanas Nyayakusumanjali) • John Hick (Ed): Classical and Contemporary Readings in Philosophy of Religion • D.M. Edwards: The Philosophy of Religion • N. K. Brahma: Philosophy of Hindu Sadhana • Brian Davies: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion • A. Sharma :Indian Philosophy of Religion • P.B. Chatterjee :Comparative Religion • Eric J. Sharpe : Comparative Religion • M. Eliade (Ch I, Sec. I)Patterns in Comparative Religion • D.P. Chattopadhyay Atheism in Indian Philosophy • Sukharanjan Saha (ed.): Essays in Indian Philosophy (pp-145-169 • Bhattacharya • Gopika Mohan Bhattacharya: Studies in Nyaya-Vaisesika Theism (pp-102-137,139-159): • Satyajyoti Chakraborty : (Pratham Khanda)Sarvadarshanasamgraha (in Bengali) • Dilip Kumar Mohanta :Dharmadarshanser Katipoy Samasya(in Bengali) • Sushil Kumar Chakraborty :Dharma Darshan (in Bengali) • Bharatiya Dharmaniti: Amita Chattopadhyay (Sampadita) (in Bengali) • B.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Ernest Belfort Bax: Marxist, Idealist, Positivist
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Ernest Belfort Bax: Marxist, Idealist, Positivist Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8sj2x7c7 Journal Journal of the History of Ideas, 54 Author Bevir, Mark Publication Date 1993 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ERNEST BELFORT BAX MARXIST, IDEALIST AND POSITIVIST BY MARK BEVIR 15 Faraday Mansions Queens Club Gardens London W14 9RH England 1 ABSTRACT Bax was the leading philosopher of the socialist revival in Britain during the 1880s. He saw Marxism as an economic and historical science that lacked a philosophical and ethical basis. Consequently, he tried to justify the Marxian dialectic by using a philosophy indebted to German idealism to show that the dialectic was a fact about reality itself, and he also tried to provide an ethical defence of Marxism in terms of a positivist ethic enshrining the goals of the French Revolution. Such an understanding of Bax's philosophy makes his political activities appear more rational than historians have previously thought. 2 ERNEST BELFORT BAX: MARXIST, IDEALIST AND POSITIVIST I Ernest Belfort Bax (1854-1926) was the leading philosopher of the British Marxist movement during its formative years. In 1881 he wrote an article which was the first to proclaim Marx to the British public and which - together with an article by H. M. Hyndman - signalled the start of the socialist revival in Britain. 1 Marx told Sorge that Bax's article was "the first publication of that kind which is pervaded by a real enthusiasm for the new ideas themselves and boldly stands up against British philistinism"; though he also complained that "the biographical notices the author gives of me are mostly wrong" and "in the exposition of my economic principles and in his translations (i.e., quotations of the Capital ) much is wrong and confused." 2 Scholars have paid little attention to Bax despite the originality and historical interest of his philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Facing an Unequal World: Challenges for a Global Sociology1
    Facing an Unequal World 3 Facing an Unequal World: Challenges for a 1 Global Sociology Michael Burawoy, University of California, Berkeley, USA2 Yuan-Tseh Lee, former president of Academia Sinica and Nobel Prize Winner, opened the second conference of the Council of National Asso- ciations with a call to scientists the world-over to come together and con- front ever-deepening global problems. Some of the most serious chal- lenges facing mankind -- climate change, energy crisis, and disease – stem from processes that transcend national boundaries and social divi- sions, yet the tools to tackle them are still largely locked within national boundaries and controlled by powerful, vested interests. The problem, Dr. Lee insisted, is not so much globalization but its incompleteness. Devel- oping global communities along with global governance is necessary for tackling global problems. We can no longer retreat back to an insular lo- calism, so we must move forward to realize the potentials of a more com- plete and complex globalization. He posed the challenge to sociology: how did we respond? As sociologists we specialize in studying the downside of globaliza- tion, the obstacles to a globalization that will benefit humanity. We are experts in the ways inequality and domination present the deepest barriers to tackling the daunting challenges of our epoch. We postulate conditions for overcoming such barriers while criticizing false solutions that redis- tribute rather than diminish the ill-effects incomplete globalization. It is the presumption of this conference that for sociologists to address the exclusion and oppression underlying poverty and war, disease and envi- ronmental degradation on a global scale, our scientific community must itself first assume a global character ruled by dialogue and accountability We gathered together in Taipei, therefore, to examine our own discipline through the bifocal lens of domination and inequality – a risky but neces- sary project -- so as to create and embrace a global sociology that is equal to the global tasks we face.
    [Show full text]
  • The Morphogenetic Approach and Immanent Causality: a Spinozian Perspective*
    Received: 4 October 2017 Revised: 10 June 2018 Accepted: 18 June 2018 DOI: 10.1111/jtsb.12181 ORIGINAL ARTICLE The morphogenetic approach and immanent causality: A spinozian perspective* Karim Knio Institute of Social Studies (ISS), Erasmus Abstract University Rotterdam, The Netherlands The morphogenetic approach as powered by analytical Correspondence dualism offers an appealing account of the processes Karim Knio, Institute of Social Studies – – (ISS), Erasmus University Rotterdam, The whereby people through their reflexivities reflect Netherlands. back on structures and cultures during the double Email: [email protected] and triple morphogenesis of agency. However, in order to further specify an account of social change, this paper argues that it would be helpful to provide an account of what occurs in the other direction as well: from the direction of structures and cultures, between each other and towards people, also at the points of double and triple morphogenesis of agency. This article is therefore a theoretical piece that proposes a reading of the morphogenetic model imbued with an enlightened understanding of immanent causality, driven by the Spinozian doctrine of parallelism and operationalized by his understanding of the two expressive roles of ideas. KEYWORDS analytical dualism, dispositions (capabilities), immanent causality, role of ideas, structure/agency debate Margaret Archer's morphogenetic approach is currently one of the most eminent and highly esteemed accounts of structure and agency in the social sciences. By referring to the concept of *I would like to thank Professor Archer for commenting on an earlier draft of this article. I also would like to thank Aleksandra Piletic for her assistance in preparing this article.
    [Show full text]
  • The Post-Postmodern Aesthetics of John Fowles Claiborne Johnson Cordle
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Master's Theses Student Research 5-1981 The post-postmodern aesthetics of John Fowles Claiborne Johnson Cordle Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses Recommended Citation Cordle, Claiborne Johnson, "The post-postmodern aesthetics of John Fowles" (1981). Master's Theses. Paper 444. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE POST-POSTMODERN AESTHETICS OF JOHN FOWLES BY CLAIBORNE JOHNSON CORDLE A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF ~.ASTER OF ARTS ,'·i IN ENGLISH MAY 1981 LTBRARY UNIVERSITY OF RICHMONl:» VIRGINIA 23173 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . p . 1 CHAPTER 1 MODERNISM RECONSIDERED . p • 6 CHAPTER 2 THE BREAKDOWN OF OBJECTIVITY . p • 52 CHAPTER 3 APOLLO AND DIONYSUS. p • 94 CHAPTER 4 SYNTHESIS . p . 102 CHAPTER 5 POST-POSTMODERN HUMANISM . p . 139 ENDNOTES • . p. 151 BIBLIOGRAPHY . • p. 162 INTRODUCTION To consider the relationship between post­ modernism and John Fowles is a task unfortunately complicated by an inadequately defined central term. Charles Russell states that ... postmodernism is not tied solely to a single artist or movement, but de­ fines a broad cultural phenomenon evi­ dent in the visual arts, literature; music and dance of Europe and the United States, as well as in their philosophy, criticism, linguistics, communications theory, anthropology, and the social sciences--these all generally under thp particular influence of structuralism.
    [Show full text]
  • A Redescriptive History of Humanism and Hermeneutics in African Philosophy
    Open Journal of Philosophy 2013. Vol.3, No.1A, 105-112 Published Online February 2013 in SciRes (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojpp) http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2013.31A017 A Redescriptive History of Humanism and Hermeneutics in African Philosophy Oladapo Jimoh Balogun Department of Philosophy, Lagos State University, Ojo, Nigeria Email: [email protected] Received September 20th, 2012; revised October 20th, 2012; accepted November 5th, 2012 The aim of this paper is to contribute to the on-going debate about self-redescription in the history of Af- rican philosophy using the method and theory of redescription. This method and theory of redescription has become the deep concern of not only Western philosophers but of many African philosophers which is markedly present in their agitated pursuits of wisdom. This self-redescription is always resiliently pre- sented in the works of Kwasi Wiredu, Kwame Appiah, Gyekye Kwame, Olusegun Oladipo, Wole Soy- inka, Sophie Oluwole, Jim Unah, Martin Heidegger and Maduabuchi Duko;r who is the most recent emergence of the problem of theory and method in African philosophy. So, the general purpose of this paper is to enact the intellectual concern of this self-redescription in the history of African philosophy while the specific purpose is to determine the adequacy of humanism and hermeneutics as concepts cov- ering the self-image of African philosophy. This paper will further show the incoherence and incongru- ence of humanism and hermeneutics with the concrete self-image of African philosophy by redescribing them in the mould of emerging concepts such as the humanness of Orisa intellectual culture, in particular; and orunmineutics as a general philosophical theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing a Morphogenetic Understanding of Organisational Behaviour
    ADVANCING A MORPHOGENETIC UNDERSTANDING OF ORGANISATIONAL BEHAVIOUR An Investigation into the Psychological Mechanisms and Organisational Behavioural Tendencies of Autonomous Reflexivity By Royston Francis Meriton Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds Leeds University Business School September 2016 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his/her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. ©2016 “The University of Leeds” Royston Francis Meriton Acknowledgement “Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery None but ourselves can free our mind…” Bob Marley (1945 – 1981) RIP To Thierry and Keisha Nicky and Mark thank you for your patience and confidence showed in me. I cannot express enough in words how much your guidance has been valued. Granny, you have been my rock, you may never know how much your influence runs deep in this work. I thank Professor Ann Cunliffe for her comments on an earlier draft and Dr Andy Brown for lending a listening ear. Without her confidence and understanding this work would not have been possible, a special mention goes to Professor Margaret Archer for her informal guidance, you are an inspiration to many. A special mention also goes to Maha, a friend I have shared many a thought with, you have the ability to inspire even without trying. All of this would have been but a fleeting illusion without Richard, thank you.
    [Show full text]
  • Mouzelis, Archer and the Concept of Social Structure
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Crossref SOCIOLOGY Vol. 32 No. 3 August 1998 509–522 CONCEPTUALISING CONSTRAINT: MOUZELIS, ARCHER AND THE CONCEPT OF SOCIAL STRUCTURE KIERAN HEALY Abstract This paper outlines and evaluates recent contributions by Nicos Mouzelis and Margaret Archer to the structure–agency debate. Mouzelis offers an internal reconstruction of Giddens’s structuration theory; Archer an external alternative. I show that, although representing an advance on Giddens’s position, Mouzelis’s account fails because he relies on the former’s definition of structure as comprising rules and resources. I then examine Archer’s solution to the problem. I argue that her definition of activity-dependence makes her account of the relationship between agents and structures unclear. I outline an alternative account in terms of super- venience, and argue that it contains the minimum ontological claim necessary for a realist understanding of the structure–agent relationship. Key words: Archer, Mouzelis, social ontology, social structure, supervenience. This paper evaluates two recent attempts to prune the hardy perennial of structure and agency. In their recent writing, both Nicos Mouzelis and Margaret Archer offer alternatives to Anthony Giddens’s structuration theory (Mouzelis 1995, 1996; Archer 1995, 1996b). The renewed attention paid to older writing in this field, and particularly to the work of David Lockwood, has caused McLennan (1995:117) to note ‘a loose but noticeable neo- traditionalist revival’ in sociological theory. The two authors exemplify this trend in different ways. Mouzelis says we should go ‘back to sociological theory,’ whereas Archer sees Lockwood as a forebear but explicitly tries to formulate a new research paradigm.
    [Show full text]
  • A REVIEW by Thomas F. Mcdaniel.1 of WILLIAM F. ALBRIGHT's
    A REVIEW by Thomas F. McDaniel.1 of WILLIAM F. ALBRIGHT’S HISTORY, ARCHAEOLOGY, AND CHRISTIAN HUMANISM 2 The scholarly contributions of William F. Albright need no introduction. To the contrary, they have been widely recognized and acclaimed in the United States, Europe and Israel. In the past twenty years, Albright has received twenty honorary doctorates from such universities as Harvard, Yale, Hebrew Union College, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Saint Andrews University, the University of Oslo, the University of Uppsala, etc. He is one of three humanistic scholars ever to have been elected to the American Academy of Sciences. Albright*s first scholarly paper appeared in the Orientalistiche Literaturseitung in 1913, and they have poured forth ever since. The bib- liography of Albright*s works (including books, articles, reports, and book reviews) listed at the end of the Albright Festschrift, (entitled, The Bible and the Ancient Near East, edited by G. Ernest Wright) is a list of over 825 published scholarly contributions which appeared between 1911 and 1958. The present book under review is the first in a series of books to be published by McGraw-Hill which will (1) gather together previously published articles which are now 1 This review was published in 1966 in Seisho to Shingaku, which was the journal of the College of Theology of Kanto Gakuin University, Yokohama, Japan. 2 New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964, ix/ 342 pages. 2 BOOK REVIEW thoroughly revised, annotated, and indexed, and (2) present the results of Albright’s continuing research and writing. This first volume includes fifteen selected lectures, essays and review articles—three of which have never been published before.
    [Show full text]
  • Theistic Humanism and the Hermeneutic Appraisal of the Doctrine of Salvation
    Open Journal of Philosophy 2013. Vol.3, No.1A, 264-272 Published Online February 2013 in SciRes (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojpp) http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2013.31A042 Theistic Humanism and the Hermeneutic Appraisal of the Doctrine of Salvation Chiedozie Okoro Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts, University of Lagos Akoka, Yaba, Nigeria Email: [email protected] Received September 22nd, 2012; revised October 20th, 2012; accepted November 7th, 2012 This essay uses theistic humanism as a super structure to do a hermeneutic appraisal of the doctrine of salvation in a pluralistic world. It operates on the assumption that reality is multidimensional, just as hu- man belief systems and cultural perspectives are diverse. More importantly, is the point that most coun- tries on the African continent house a potpourri of belief systems, prominent among which are Christian- ity, Islam and Traditional African Religion (ATR). Thus, theistic humanism offers us the opportunity to do a pluralistic assessment of salvation, thereby making myriad interpretations of the notion of salvation possible. Again, the essay neither intends to examine the meaning of God nor is it interested in analyzing how God gets manifested in human existence. Rather, the basic objective is to consider the various ways in which salvation has been conceived in relation to the human condition. In the process of our delinea- tion, it shall be shown that salvation as a doctrine can be conceived from two principal angles which are: 1) the perspective of religion and 2) the non-religious or secularist perspective. Whereas the first presents other-worldly account of salvation, the second presents a this-worldly account of salvation.
    [Show full text]
  • Margaret Archer and a Morphogenetic Take on Strategy Abstract The
    Margaret Archer and a morphogenetic take on strategy Abstract The morphogenetic framework developed by the social theorist Margaret Archer is outlined in order to suggest what it might bring to the study of strategy. It is contrasted to practice-based approaches, notably those associated with the work of Richard Whittington and the domain of strategy as practice. Archer’s work provides a non-deterministic approach which enables the situating of moments of strategic practice in a wider context. Its stress on agential reflexivity opens up interesting lines of inquiry, not least on the language of strategizing facilitated and encouraged by the multinational corporation. The approach needs to pay more attention to practices, notably organizational routines, but it offers rich resources to the student of organizational strategy. Keywords Margaret Archer; critical realism; strategy; structure; agency; reflexivity 1. Introduction Margaret Archer is a major figure in the world of social theory and sociology. Starting as a sociologist of education she has developed a distinctive approach to the study of society through her engagement with the philosophical tradition of critical realism. Through a critique of how these ideas have been applied in the social domain, she has progressively developed and refined a view of what she terms the ‘morphogenesis’ of society. This view, recognising that society is activity dependent and is changed and reproduced through the activities of human agents who operate in conditions not of their choosing, has had increasing traction in many domains of 1 inquiry, not least in the field of organization studies. Her body of work is extensive and complex.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emotionalisation of Reflexivity
    Edinburgh Research Explorer The Emotionalization of Reflexivity Citation for published version: Holmes, M 2010, 'The Emotionalization of Reflexivity', Sociology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509351616 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1177/0038038509351616 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: Sociology General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 The Emotionalization of Reflexivity Mary Holmes Department of Sociology Flinders University [email protected] Biography: Mary Holmes is a senior lecturer in sociology at Flinders University in Australia. She has published various articles relating to her empirical work on distance relationships and to her other research interests in the sociology of the body and in social movements and emotions. She has recently published The Representation of Feminists as Political Actors (VDM, 2008) What is Gender?(Sage, 2008) and Gender in Everyday Life (Routledge, 2007). 1 The Emotionalization of Reflexivity Abstract Reflexivity refers to the practices of altering one’s life as a response to knowledge about one’s circumstances.
    [Show full text]