DOCSLIB.ORG

Democracy Should Not Be This Hard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Democracy Should Not Be This Hard THE 2014 ELECTION PROTECTION REPORT DEMOCRACY SHOULD NOT BE THIS HARD PRESENTED BY i DEMOCRACY SHOULD NOT BE THIS HARD THE 2014 ELECTION PROTECTION REPORT: DEMOCRACY SHOULD NOT BE THIS HARD Published February 2015 ELECTION PROTECTION Led by the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law 1401 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20005 Phone: (202) 662-8600 Toll Free: (888) 299-5227 Fax: (202) 783-0857 www.866OurVote.org /866OurVote @866OurVote www.lawyerscommittee.org /lawyerscommittee @lawyerscomm ©2015. This publication is covered by the Creative Commons “Attribution” license (see http://creativecommons.org). It may be reproduced in its entirety or modifi ed as long as the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law is credited, a link to the license is included, and if changes were made to the original document, notifi cation that changes were made. NOTE: This report refl ects the views of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law and does not necessarily refl ect the views of any other Election Protection partner ii or supporter. DEMOCRACY SHOULD NOT BE THIS HARD About ELECTION PROTECTION The nonpartisan Election Protection coalition—led by the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law—was formed to ensure that all voters have an equal opportunity to participate in the political process. This coalition is made up of more than 100 local, state and national partners. Through our state of the art hotlines (1-866-OUR VOTE, administered by the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, 1-888-API-VOTE, administered by Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC and Asian & Pacifi c Islander American Vote (APIAVote), and 1-888-Ve-Y-Vota, administered by the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Offi cials Educational Fund); interactive website (www.866ourvote.org); and voter protection fi eld programs across the country, we provide Americans from coast to coast with comprehensive voter information and advice on how they can make sure their vote is counted. iii DEMOCRACY SHOULD NOT BE THIS HARD ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Author: Jennifer L. Patin Special thanks to members of the Lawyers’ Committee staff who contributed to the Report and Election Protection Program: Rahwa Andemichael, Nancy Anderson, Barbara Arnwine, Genevieve Bonadies, Rose Clouston, Brendan Downes, Brian Duggan, Chris Melody Fields, Maddy Finucane, Dr. Megan Gall, Arusha Gordon, Jon Greenbaum, Julie Houk, Marcia Johnson-Blanco, Bob Kengle, David Kuennen, Alan Martinson, Eileen O’Connor, Trevor Ostbye, Maria Peralta, Mark Posner, Dorian Spence, Nora Stephens, Alejandro Reyes, Ezra Rosenberg, Stacie Royster and Miriam Vishniac. Election Protection hotline administrators • Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law / 1-866-OUR-VOTE • National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Offi cials Educational Fund (NALEO) / 1-888-VE-Y-VOTA • Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC and Asian & Pacifi c Islander American Vote (APIAVote) / 1-888-API-VOTE iv DEMOCRACY SHOULD NOT BE THIS HARD 2014 Election Protection Coalition Partners • The A. Philip Randolph Institute (APRI) • NAACP National Voter Fund • Advancement Project • National Bar Association (NBA) • AFL-CIO • National Black Law Students Association • Alliance for Justice (NBLSA) • American Association for Justice • National Coalition on Black Civic • American Association of University Participation Women Action Fund • National Coalition for the Homeless • American Bar Association (ABA) • National Council of Jewish Women • American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) • National Council of La Raza (NCLR) • American Federation of Teachers (AFT) • National Disability Rights Network • Asian American Legal Defense and (NDRN) Education Fund (AALDEF) • National Education Association (NEA) • Black Entertainment Television (BET) • National Urban League • Brennan Center for Justice • Native Vote • Bus Federation Civic Fund • New Organizing Institute (NOI) • Campaign Legal Center • New Voters Project • Center for Community Change • Nonprofi t VOTE • Color of Change • Overseas Vote Foundation • Common Cause • People for the American Way • Cuentame • ProgressNOW • Demos • Project Vote • Fair Elections Legal Network (FELN) • Rock the Vote • Hip Hop Caucus • Service Employees International Union • Hispanic National Bar Association (SEIU) • Human Rights Campaign • Sierra Club • Impact • State Voices • LatinoJustice PRLDEF • Leadership Conference Education Fund • League of United Latin American Citizens • Voter Participation Center (LULAC) • TurboVote • League of Young Voters Education Fund • U.S. PIRG • League of Women Voters • U.S. Vote Foundation • Long Distance Voter • United States Hispanic Leadership • Mexican American Legal Defense and Institute (USHLI) Educational Fund (MALDEF) • United States Student Association • Mi Familia Vota (USSA) • MomsRising • United Steelworkers (USW) International • National Action Network (NAN) • Verifi ed Voting Foundation • National Asian Pacifi c American Bar • Video the Vote Association (NAPABA) • VoteRiders • National Association for the • Voto Latino Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) • Women Donors Network • NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) v DEMOCRACY SHOULD NOT BE THIS HARD 2014 Election Protection State and Local Organizations • ACLU of Arkansas • Georgia Coalition for the People’s Agenda • ACLU of California Voting Rights Project • Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and • ACLU of Florida Refugee Rights • ACLU of Pennsylvania • Illinois PIRG • ACLU of South Carolina • Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. (ITCA) • ACLU of Wisconsin • J.L. Turner Legal Association • Arizona Advocacy Network • Just Vote Colorado • Bus Federation • Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and • Council on American-Islamic Relations Economic Justice of Greater Boston Chicago (CAIR) • Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the • California Common Cause San Francisco Bay Area • Central Reform Congregation • League of Women Voters of Ohio • Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil • League of Women Voters of Philadelphia Rights Under Law • League of Women Voters Minnesota • Chicago Votes • Michigan Election Coalition • Cleveland Branch of the NAACP • Milwaukee Area Labor Council • Colorado Common Cause • Minnesota Voice • Colorado Lawyers’ Committee • Montana Voices • Common Cause Illinois • Nebraskans for Civic Reform • Common Cause Michigan • New Virginia Majority • Common Cause Minnesota • Northeast Ohio Voter Advocates • Common Cause New Mexico • Ohio Voice • Common Cause New York • Pennsylvania Voice • Common Cause North Carolina • ProGeorgia • Common Cause Ohio • ProgressOhio • Common Cause Pennsylvania • Rocky Mountain PBS • Democracy North Carolina • South Carolina Progressive Network • Florida Coalition on Black Civic • Southern Coalition for Social Justice Participation • The Black Political Empowerment Project • Florida Institute for Reform and • Urban League of Philadelphia Empowerment • Virginia Civic Engagement Table • Florida New Majority • Virginia New Majority • Florida State Voices Civic Engagement • Wisconsin Voices Table • Wolverine Bar Association • Forward Montana • Georgia Association of Latino Elected Offi cials vi DEMOCRACY SHOULD NOT BE THIS HARD A tremendous thank you to the following law fi rms, corporate legal departments and law schools for their support of Election Protection 2014: • Arent Fox LLP • Michigan Election Law Project, University • Arnold & Porter LLP of Michigan Law School • Ballard Spahr LLP • Miner, Barnhill & Galland, P.C. • Bingham McCutchen LLP • Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP • Blank Rome LLP • Morrison & Foerster LLP • BNY Mellon • Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP • Buchalter Nemer • Nixon Peabody LLP • Butt Thornton & Baehr PC • O’Melveny & Myers LLP • Butzel Long • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliff e LLP • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt • Osborn Maledon, P. A. • Citigroup Inc. • Paul Hastings LLP • Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP • Paul, Weiss, Rifk ind, Wharton & Garrison • Cooley LLP LLP • Crowell & Moring LLP • Pepper Hamilton LLP • Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP • Proskauer Rose LLP • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP • Qualcomm Inc. • Dechert LLP • Reed Smith LLC • DLA Piper • Sedgwick LLP • Dorsey & Whitney LLP • Seyfarth Shaw LLP • Emory University School of Law • Shearman & Sterling LLP • Fenwick & West LLP • Sidley Austin LLP • Florida A&M University College of Law • Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP • Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson • Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP LLP • Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLC • Gibney, Anthony & Flaherty LLP • Sullivan & Cromwell LLP • Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher • Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP • Hogan Lovells • The Law Offi ce of Roger L. Weeden • Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP • The Sweetser Law Firm • Indian Legal Clinic, Sandra Day O’Connor • Troutman Sanders LLP College of Law, Arizona State University • University of Missouri-Kansas City • Jacobs Injury Law S.C. • University of North Carolina Center for • Jaff e Raitt Heuer & Weiss P.C. Civil Rights • K&L Gates LLP • University of North Carolina School of Law • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP • Washington University in St. Louis • King & Spalding LLP • Wayne State University Law School • Kirkland & Ellis LLP • Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP • Latham & Watkins LLP • White Coleman & Associates LLC • Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP • William & Mary Law School • Mayer Brown LLP • Winston & Strawn LLP vii DEMOCRACY SHOULD NOT BE THIS HARD viii DEMOCRACY SHOULD NOT BE THIS HARD CONTENTS Executive Summary................................................................................................2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • States' Responses 12.7.17
    DEMOCRACY DIMINISHED: STATE AND LOCAL THREATS TO VOTING POST‐SHELBY COUNTY, ALABAMA V. HOLDER As of December 8, 2017 Introduction For nearly 50 years, Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) required certain jurisdictions (including states, counties, cities, and towns) with a history of chronic racial discrimination in voting to submit all proposed voting changes to the U.S. Department of Justice (U.S. DOJ) or a federal court in Washington, D.C. for pre- approval. This requirement is commonly known as “preclearance.” Section 5 preclearance served as our democracy’s discrimination checkpoint by halting discriminatory voting changes before they were implemented. It protected Black, Latino, Asian, Native American, and Alaskan Native voters from racial discrimination in voting in the states and localities—mostly in the South—with a history of having the most entrenched and adaptive forms of racial discrimination in voting. Section 5 placed the burden of proof, time, and expense1 on the covered state or locality to demonstrate that a proposed voting change was not discriminatory before that change went into effect and could spread its harm. Section 4(b) of the VRA, the coverage provision, authorized Congress to determine which jurisdictions should be “covered” and, thus, were required to seek preclearance. Preclearance applied to nine states (Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, and Virginia) and a number of counties, cities, and towns in six partially covered states (California, Florida, Michigan, New York, North Carolina, and South Dakota). On June 25, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States immobilized the preclearance process in Shelby County, Alabama v.
    [Show full text]
  • Voter Registration
    A publication of End Domestic Abuse WI Volume 39, Issue 1 Empowering Survivors in Wisconsin MARCH 2020 INSIDE THIS ISSUE Confidential Voters .........................2 Your Right to Vote and Be Safe Local Program Assisting Voters: Life often has a way of coming full circle. Rainbow House.................................4 Safety Considerations .....................5 In my first year at End Domestic Abuse WI, when I was the Public Policy Spotlight: VoteRiders WI ................6 Coordinator, I collaborated with the National Network to End Domestic Spotlight: Coalition of Voting Violence (NNEDV) on a project called VOTE POWER. VOTE POWER Organizations ...................................8 intended to explore the ways in which coalitions could work with local First Time Voter: Aliyana ................9 Local Program Assisting Voters: domestic abuse programs to ensure that victims and advocates had Golden House...................................9 information and safe access to voting. I remember being so excited to What Can Nonprofits Do? ........... 10 think about voter engagement through my work at the coalition, Local Program Assisting Voters: Advocates of Ozaukee ................ 10 something that never even occurred to me when I worked at a If You Are Homeless ..................... 11 domestic violence shelter. I made Vote Power buttons, created CDs of Spotlight: BLOC ............................. 12 social change/voting-inspired music, and I traveled the state putting on Criminal Convictions & Voting Rights Get Out the Vote (GOTV) seminars with advocates. ......................................................... 13 First Time Voters: Vicki & Ted ..... 14 Now nearly 20 years later, and in my final days at the coalition, we at New Voting Accessibility Law ..... 14 End Abuse are still working on ways to engage domestic abuse Nursing Homes or Long Term Care ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • State's Responses As of 8.21.18
    DEMOCRACY DIMINISHED: STATE AND LOCAL THREATS TO VOTING POST‐SHELBY COUNTY, ALABAMA V. HOLDER As of August 30, 2019 Introduction For nearly 50 years, Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) required certain jurisdictions (including states, counties, cities, and towns) with a history of chronic racial discrimination in voting to submit all proposed voting changes to the U.S. Department of Justice (U.S. DOJ) or a federal court in Washington, D.C. for pre- approval. This requirement is commonly known as “preclearance.” Section 5 preclearance served as our democracy’s discrimination checkpoint by halting discriminatory voting changes before they were implemented. It protected Black, Latinx, Asian, Native American, and Alaskan Native voters from racial discrimination in voting in the states and localities—mostly in the South—with a history of the most entrenched and adaptive forms of racial discrimination in voting. Section 5 placed the burden of proof, time, and expense1 on the covered state or locality to demonstrate that a proposed voting change was not discriminatory before that change went into effect and could harm vulnerable populations. Section 4(b) of the VRA, the coverage provision, authorized Congress to determine which jurisdictions should be “covered” and, thus, were required to seek preclearance. Preclearance applied to nine states (Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, and Virginia) and a number of counties, cities, and towns in six partially covered states (California, Florida, Michigan, New York, North Carolina, and South Dakota). On June 25, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States immobilized the preclearance process in Shelby County, Alabama v.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Voter Registration Guide
    → ● ● ● ● ● Alabama Kentucky North Dakota Alaska Louisiana Ohio Arizona Maine Oklahoma Arkansas Maryland Oregon California Massachusetts Pennsylvania Colorado Michigan Rhode Island Connecticut Minnesota South Carolina Delaware Mississippi South Dakota District of Columbia (DC) Missouri Tennessee Florida Montana Texas Georgia Nebraska Utah Hawaii Nevada Vermont Idaho New Hampshire Virginia Illinois New Jersey Washington (state) Indiana New Mexico West Virginia Iowa New York Wisconsin Kansas North Carolina Wyoming INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON 2020 Voter Registration 1 2 3 4 INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON • • • • • • • 2020 Voter Registration • • • • • • • • • INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON • • 2020 Voter Registration • • • • • • • • • • INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON You’ve chosen to vote in Indiana! Before you get started, have these things out: ✔ Indiana Driver’s License or State ID (Click here if you don’t have one) ✔ Address where you would like to be registered to vote and county (lookup my county) ✔ Mailing address (where you would like your vote-by-mail ballot to be sent) >>>how to choose<<< If you have any questions about this process, please see the FAQ or get connected to someone at our office through our contact page. This is a resource of Ask Every Student, a project of the ALL IN Campus Democracy Challenge, the Campus Vote Project, NASPA, and the Students Learn Students Vote Coalition. Learn more about Ask Every Student at studentvoting.org. LAST UPDATED: SEPTEMBER 22, 2020 First make sure you’re eligible to vote! Who is eligible to vote? Who isn't eligible to vote? You can vote in U.S. elections if you: ● Non-citizens, including permanent legal residents ● Are a U.S. citizen ● Some people with felony ● Meet your state’s residency requirements convictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing for Elections During a Pandemic for More Information on This Publication, Visit
    C O R P O R A T I O N QUENTIN E. HODGSON, JENNIFER KAVANAGH, ANUSREE GARG, EDWARD W. CHAN, CHRISTINE SOVAK Options for Ensuring Safe Elections Preparing for Elections During a Pandemic For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RRA112-10 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0555-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover image: Rosemarie/Adobe Stock Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface In this report, we present and analyze options for voting amid poten- tially extended threats resulting from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Voting Matters: the PFLAG National “Get out the Vote” and Voting Guide
    Voting Matters: The PFLAG National “Get Out the Vote” and Voting Guide 2018 Edition Dear PFLAG members and supporters: Thank you for downloading the 2018 edition of Voting Matters, PFLAG National’s short, ​ ​ resource-rich “Get Out the Vote” guide. While we always urge PFLAGers to exercise their right to vote and recruit others to do so, this year’s election is one of the most critical in our lifetime and needs our extra effort: So much is at stake, and the power of PFLAG’s unique united voice of LGBTQ+ people, families, and allies will affect the outcome. Here is what research tells us: ● According to a PRRI survey released Oct. 11th, 35 percent of Americans ages 18-29 say ​ ​ they are absolutely certain to vote in the November elections, compared to 81 percent of seniors and 55 percent of all Americans. Young Americans are also significantly less likely than seniors to say that their friends are certain to vote (7 percent vs. 18 percent). ● According to a Washington Post-ABC News poll released on Oct. 14th, voters express ​ ​ significantly more interest in turning out than in 2014. ● Harvard Business Review reports that face-to-face requests are 34 times more successful than email. This guide provides critical information to help you more effectively advocate to get out the vote, and your understanding of the needs of your community and what works best to meet those needs will make a critical difference, whether it's shuttling seniors to their polling places, encouraging young people to vote and helping to educate them to do so, or partnering with local groups on get out the vote (GOTV) volunteer initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Info Client Needs to Know & What Docs to Bring
    VoteRiders Voter ID Clinics – Training Materials Use of this form indicates that you are part of a VoteRiders Partner Organization-led Voter ID Clinic and will share the non-personal data collected from the Clinic with VoteRiders. THE INFORMATION CLIENTS SHOULD KNOW AND THE DOCUMENTS THEY SHOULD BRING TO THE VOTER ID CLINIC INFORMATION Ideally, clients will call in advance to register for the Clinic and will advise the Clinic Supervisor what records they need and the states where each is located. However, many clients will not call to register, and those who do may not be aware of some of the documents they do require. If a client identifies the necessity for a particular document so he or she can obtain a voter ID, the following is a list of the information that is generally needed in order to apply for the record: • Birth Certificates – name at birth, date of birth, state and county of birth (if the person knows the name of the hospital or the name of the town, the county can be found through an Internet search), and mother’s maiden name. This last piece of information may be very important because some states (e.g., North Carolina) file the record under the mother’s maiden name; and if the client doesn’t know his mother’s maiden name, he cannot get the record; • Death Certificates – the name of the deceased, the date of death, state and county where the death occurred, deceased’s Social Security number, deceased’s date of birth. Not all states will require all this information, but if the client can obtain it beforehand, it will expedite the process; • Marriage Certificates – state and county where the marriage took place, date of marriage.
    [Show full text]
  • State Birth Certificate Table
    VoteRiders Voter ID Clinics – Training Materials STATE BIRTH CERTIFICATE TABLE Use of this form indicates that you are part of a VoteRiders Partner Organization-led Voter ID Clinic and will share the non-personal data collected from the Clinic with VoteRiders. State Can Attorney Order? Notary needed? Fee Address Alabama Yes - request as Legal $15 Alabama Center for Health Statistics http://adph.org Representative, state Alabama Department of Public Health (334) 206-5418 reason as "legal issue" P.O. BoX 5625 Include Rep Agreement Montgomery, AL 36103-5625 and atty's photo ID Alaska Yes - include letter stating $25 Department of Health and Social Services http://dhss.alaska.gov whom atty represents, Bureau of Vital Statistics (907) 465-3391 Rep Agreement and 5441 Commercial Boulevard atty's photo ID Juneau, AK 99801 Arizona Yes - letter on attorney's $20 money Office of Vital Records order/ http://www.azdhs.gov letterhead stating Arizona Department of Health Services relationship to registrant cashier's P.O. Box 3887 check and include atty ID#, PhoeniX, AZ 85030-3887 photo ID, and Rep Agreement Arkansas Yes - request as the $12 Arkansas Department of Health registrant's Designated Vital Records Section, Slot 44 http://www.healthy.arkansas.gov Representative; include 4815 West Markham Street (501) 661-2336 Rep Agreement, atty's Little Rock, AR 72205 photo ID © 2013 VoteRiders VoteRiders Voter ID Clinics – Training Materials California Yes - letter stating Notarized $18 CA Depart of Public Health - Vital Records http://www.cdph.ca.gov atty represents the reg- signature is MS: 5103 (916) 445-2684 required istrant.
    [Show full text]
  • State Death, Marriage, Divorce Table
    VoteRiders Voter ID Clinics – Training Materials STATE DEATH, MARRIAGE, DIVORCE TABLE Use of this form indicates that you are part of a VoteRiders Partner Organization-led Voter ID Clinic and will share the non-personal data collected from the Clinic with VoteRiders. Marriage Record Fee; Death Record Fee; Can Divorce Order Fee; Can State Can attorney obtain Address attorney obtain record? attorney obtain record? record? Alabama $15 $15 (records since 1936) $15 if filed w/ State (post Alabama Center for http://adph.org Yes - request as Legal Yes - request as Legal 1950), pre-1950 contact Health Statistics (334) 206-5418 Representative, state Representative, state county. Yes- request as Legal Alabama Department reason as "legal issue" reason as "legal issue" Representative, state reason as of Public Health include Rep Agreement include Rep Agreement “legal issue” include Rep P.O. Box 5625 and atty's photo ID and atty's photo ID Agreement and atty’s photo ID Montgomery, AL 36103-5625 $25 $25 $25 records since 1950; pre- Department of Health Alaska Yes - include letter stating Yes - include letter stating 1950, contact county. Yes - & Social Bureau of http://dhss.alaska.gov whom atty represents, whom atty represents, include letter stating whom Vital Statistics (907) 465-3391 Rep Agreement and Rep Agreement and atty represents, Rep 5441 Commercial atty's photo ID atty's photo ID Agreement and atty’s photo ID Boulevard Juneau, AK 99801 Arizona Cost varies Office of Vital Records http://www.azdhs.gov Yes - letter on attorney's Yes - letter on attorney’s Arizona Department of Yes - letter on attorney's letterhead stating relation- letterhead stating relation- letterhead stating relationship Health Services ship to registrant and ship to registrant and to registrant and include atty P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Voteriders Site-Absentee Voting 9 2014
    Absentee Voting/Vote by Mail Requirements Who is eligible for Absentee Voting? What Types of Identification are Required to apply for Absentee Voting? - Anyone who will be absent from their registered Same Voter ID as required at the Polls: county on Election Day -Valid Driver's License - An individual who is ill or physically unable to reach -Valid Non-driver ID their assigned polling place -Valid Alabama Photo Voter ID - A registered voter who is living outside their Alabama -Valid State Issued ID (Alabama or any other state) county -Valid Federal Issued ID - If the individual is an election official or poll watcher -Valid US Passport Alabama outside their assigned polling place -Valid Employee ID from Federal Government, State of - Works a required shift of at least 10 hours that Alabama, County Government, Municipality, Board, conflicts with polling hours on Election Day Authority, or other entity of this state -Valid student or employee ID from a college or university in the State of Alabama (including postgraduate technical or professional schools) -Valid Military ID -Valid Tribal ID Only ONE of the three option is required for application Any registered Alaska voter can vote absentee - Social Security Number - Alaska Driver’s License Alaska - Alaska State ID There is an option on the absentee voting application to check that the individual has none of these Identifiers Any qualified voter in Arizona can apply None - signature on vote-by-mail ballot must match voter - Qualified includes: An individual is a U.S. Citizen who is registration
    [Show full text]
  • Empowering Voters and Voting Rights Activists in Alabama: a Toolkit Table of Contents
    EMPOWERING VOTERS AND VOTING RIGHTS ACTIVISTS IN ALABAMA: A TOOLKIT TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..........................................................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................2 IMPORTANT DATES AND DEADLINES ..................................................................................................4 WHO CAN VOTE .................................................................................................................................5 REGISTRATION ...................................................................................................................................5 VOTING BY ABSENTEE BALLOT ............................................................................................................6 VOTING BY PROVISIONAL BALLOT ......................................................................................................7 VOTING ON ELECTION DAY .................................................................................................................7 ALABAMA'S CROSSOVER VOTING LAW ...............................................................................................8 ALABAMA'S VOTER ID LAW ................................................................................................................9 A GUIDE TO REGISTERING VOTERS IN ALABAMA ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Year-End Report
    2018 Florida Report Mi Familia Vota 2018 MI FAMILIA VOTA AND MI FAMILIA VOTA EDUCATION FUND Mi Familia Vota Florida is a project of Mi Familia Vota (MFV), a tax-exempt under tax code section 501(c)(4), and Mi Familia Vota Education Fund (MFVEF), a public charity tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3). Each entity is governed by a separate board of directors. Mi Familia Vota / Mi Familia Vota Education Fund is the leading grassroots Latino civic engagement organization in the country. We employ targeted and innovative field and communications strategies that uplift Latino voices in communities across the country and advocates on issues (immigration reform, education, healthcare, economic and worker justice, voting rights, and the environment) year-round. PAGE 2 POTENTIAL LATINO POWER Florida at a Glance 2020 Potential Latino Voters: 3.3 million 1.9 million Latinos currently registered to vote, making up 16% of total registered voters ( Voter Activation Network (VAN)*, Active Latino Registrants / Total Active Registrants, 2018) 671,000 Latinos in FL currently eligible but not registered to vote (U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Latino CVAP Estimates - 2018 Active Latino Registrants from VAN) 168,000 Latino youth aging into the electorate between 2018 and 2020 ( U.S. Census Bureau, ACS, Estimate of 15-17 year-olds, 2011-2013) 636,600 Latino Legal Permanent Residents eligible to naturalize and register to vote (USC Center for the Study of Immigrant Integration (CSII) analysis of a pooled sample of the 2010-2014 American Community Survey (ACS) microdata) All figures are rounded estimates and contain some margin of error.
    [Show full text]