The Future of High Energy Physics and China’s Role

Yifang Wang Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing RAL, Oct.5, 2018 A Very Active Field

ILC,FCC, China-based LHC: ATLAS/CMS CEPC/SPPC High China-participated Others Energy Compositeness AMS, PAMELA Extra-dimensions Supersymmetry Antimatter Higgs CP violation Daya Bay, JUNO,T2K,Nova, SuperK,HyperK,LBNF/DUNE, Icecube/PINGU, KM3net/ORKA, Precision Standard SNO+,EXO/nEXO, KamLAND-Zen, COMET, tests Model Gerda,Katrin… mu2e, g-2, K-decays,… Hadron physics Cosmology & QCD Standard Model of Cosmology Rare decays Dark matter LUX, Xenon, LZ, BESIII,LHCb, Axions PandaX, CDEX, High BELLEII, Darkside, … precision PANDA,… ADMX,… Fermi, DAMPE, AMS,… Roadmaps of HEP in the World • Japan (2012) – If new particles(e.g. Higgs) are discovered, build ILC

– If θ13 is big enough, build HyperK and T2HK • EU (2013) – Continue LHC, upgrade its luminosity, until 2035 – Study future circular collider (FCC-hh or FCC-ee) • US (2014) – Build long baseline facility LBNF/DUNE – Study future colliders

A new round of roadmap study is starting Where Are We Going ? • ILC is a machine we planned for ~30 years, way before the Higgs boson was discovered. Is it still the only machine for our future ? • Shall we wait for results from LHC/HL-LHC to decide our next step ? • What if ILC could not be approved ? • What is the future of High Energy Physics ? • A new route: – Thanks to the low mass Higgs, there is a possibility to build a circular e+e- collider(Higgs factory) followed by a proton machine in the same tunnel – This idea was reported for the first time at the “Higgs Factory workshop(HF2012)” in Oct. 2012 at Fermilab 4 CEPC:A Higgs Factory

• Since 80’s, IHEP were working on e+e- colliders: BEPC/BEPCII • Since 2005, IHEP was discussing the next machine after BEPCII • The idea of a Circular e+e- Collider(CEPC) followed by a Super proton-proton collider(SPPC) quickly gained the momentum in IHEP and in the world Science of CEPC-SPPC • -positron collider(90, 250 GeV) – Higgs Factory(106 Higgs): PC • Precision study of Higgs(mH, J , couplings),Similar & complementary to ILC • Looking for hints of new physics – Z & W factory(1010 Z0): • precision test of SM • Rare decays ? – Flavor factory: b, c, t and QCD studies • Proton-proton collider(~100 TeV) – Directly search for new physics beyond SM – Precision test of SM • e.g., h3 & h4 couplings Precision measurement + searches:

2018/10/22 Complementary with each other ! 6 Higgs:the Window to New Physics • A very special particle: – The only elementary particle with spin 0 • Really elementary ? • Similar to p, Cooper pair ? – The only elementary particle with non-gauge interactions • Self-coupling and Yukawa coupling: anything new ? • Directly related to physics beyond SM & Cosmology – May interact with dark matter particles Detailed – Origin of the mass of Higgs ? study of – Self-coupling may affect the evolution of the universe Higgs can – Understand the vacuum: why meta-stable ? not be skipped • Goal: By detailed and precise measurement of Higgs

properties to understand these issues 7 Precision Higgs Physics by CEPC

At LHC: Direct searches: M ~ 1 TeV 10% precision: M ~ 1 TeV CEPC preCDR Volume 1 (p.9)

At CEPC: 1% precision  M ~10 TeV

Higgs factory is our first choice if no new physics at LHC Higgs factory is also a great choice if new physics found at LHC Nature of EW Phase Transition ? • 1st or 2nd order  Huge implications – O(1) deviations in h3 coupling – O(1%) shift in h-Z coupling • CEPC can determine it: – h3 coupling at CEPC: 20-30% – h-Z coupling at CEPC: < 0.2% arXiv:1608.06619

2018/10/22 9 M. McCullough, PRD 90(2014)015001 Improvement in Electroweak Precision • A total of 1011 Z • A detailed study of Z & W to look for deviations from the Standard Model • Can probe new physics up to ~ TeV,better than HL-LHC by a factor of 3

CEPC preCDR Volume 1 (p.10) 2018/10/22 10 Comparison with Other Machines Science Upgrade Technology Cost Schedule CEPC **** **** **** ***** ***** SppC ***** * ** *** *** ILC **** * *** **** ***** FCC-ee **** **** **** **** ? FCC-pp ***** * ** ** *** CLIC **** ** *** *** ** VLHC ***** *** **** ** ? Muon ***** **** * * ? collider New ***** ? ?? ? ?? acceleration CEPC+SPPC is the best combination CEPC is also a great light source • From dipole magnet, the photon energy can reach 628keV. • From Wiggler or undulator,the photon energy can reach 100MeV • Incredible application on nuclear physics, material science, micro- processing, etc.

CEPC CEPC

12 CEPC Accelerator Design

Energy Ramp 6~10 GeV Electron 10 ->45/120GeV

LINAC Booster Positron 3 Machines in a tunnel:  CEPC & booster  SppC Compatibility is the key

Storage Ring

45/120 GeV CEPC CDR Basseline Layout

Collider ring Booster ring

Baseline: 100 km, 30 MW; Upgradable to 50 MW, High Lumi Z Try all means to cut cost down

14 CEPC Linac Injector Baseline: 10 GeV

An alternative based on Plasma Wakefield Accelerator: 45 GeV

• HTR PWFA with good stability (single stage TR=3-4, Cascaded stage 6-12, high efficiency) • Positron generation and acceleration in an electron beam driven PWFA using hollow plasma channel (TR=1) Luminosity

 2 detectors

ILC,1 detector

For the same cost,CEPC may obtain 6 more Higgs (+ a tunnel for proton machine) Main Parameters Higgs W Z(3T) Z(2T) Number of IPs 2 Beam energy (GeV) 120 80 45.5 Circumference (km) 100 Synchrotron radiation loss/turn (GeV) 1.73 0.34 0.036 Crossing angle at IP (mrad) 16.5×2 Piwinski angle 2.58 7.0 23.8 10 Number of particles/bunch Ne (10 ) 15.0 12.0 8.0 Bunch number (bunch spacing) 242 (0.68s) 1524 (0.21s) 12000 (25ns+10%gap) Beam current (mA) 17.4 87.9 461.0 Synchrotron radiation power /beam (MW) 30 30 16.5 Bending radius (km) 10.7 Momentum compact (10-5) 1.11

 function at IP x* / y* (m) 0.36/0.0015 0.36/0.0015 0.2/0.0015 0.2/0.001 Emittance ex/ey (nm) 1.21/0.0031 0.54/0.0016 0.18/0.004 0.18/0.0016 Beam size at IP sx /sy (m) 20.9/0.068 13.9/0.049 6.0/0.078 6.0/0.04 Beam-beam parameters x/y 0.031/0.109 0.013/0.106 0.0041/0.056 0.0041/0.072 RF voltage VRF (GV) 2.17 0.47 0.10 RF frequency f RF (MHz) (harmonic) 650 (216816) Natural bunch length sz (mm) 2.72 2.98 2.42 Bunch length sz (mm) 3.26 5.9 8.5 Betatron tune x/y 363.10 / 365.22 Synchrotron tune s 0.065 0.0395 0.028 HOM power/cavity (2 cell) (kw) 0.54 0.75 1.94 Natural energy spread (%) 0.1 0.066 0.038 Energy acceptance requirement (%) 1.35 0.4 0.23 Energy acceptance by RF (%) 2.06 1.47 1.7 Photon number due to beamstrahlung 0.29 0.35 0.55 Lifetime _simulation (min) 100 Lifetime (hour) 0.67 1.4 4.0 2.1 F (hour glass) 0.89 0.94 0.99 Luminosity/IP L (1034cm-2s-1) 2.93 10.1 16.6 32.1 17 CEPC Funding in China

Funding from NCDR HEP seed money Failed 11 M RMB/3 years (2015-2017) Funding from the MOST Funding from NSFC straing 36 M/5yr in 2016 from 2015: ~ 2 M/yr 31 M/5yr in 2018

Funding from CAS 40M/5yr talent program 6M/5r international collaboration 360M/5y HTc materials and magnet

Funding Beijing city 300M/3yr for accelerator(light source) 6 M/5yr for RF cavities Funding needed for CEPC design and R&D are mostly satisfied R&D and Prototypes

Collaborating on Klystrons Superconducting RF Cavities

6m long vacuum pipes(Al & Cu) High precision, low field dipole magnet SRF Cavities

 Key components for CEPC and New SRF test facility under construction other accelerators  A new SRF testing facility is under construction, thanks to Beijing city government  Shanghai city government decided to built Shanghai Coherent Light Facility(SCLF).  432 1.3 GHz cavities  54 Cryomodules  IHEP plans to provide > 1/3 of cavities and cryomodules, an excellent exercise for us. CEPC/SPPC and FCC

• It would be great if we can have one of them • We are happy to collaborate with FCC and even join the FCC if it is approved • We believe that it is better to start e+e- first and in the meantime to develop the next generation magnet technology

• Current technology based on NbSn3 is already 60 years old: difficult, expensive and not so high the field • Next generation high Tc Superconducting cable should be our goal, in particular Fe-based HTC • Advantages: metal, easy to process; isotropic; cheap in principle • ~ 20 years development time needed for HTC cable is just about right for us to work on the e+e- collider

21 High Field Magnet based on HTC Cable ? • Future FCC_hh/SPPC should based on future technologies • HTC has a huge impact beyond HEP if we can improve the performance/cost ratio by a factor 100 • Fe-based HTC cable at CAS • World highest Tc Fe-based materials • World first ~ 115 m Fe-based SC cables: 12000 A/cm2 @ 10 T • A collaboration on “HTC SC materials” established • IOP, USTC, IOEE, SC cable companies • Two approaches: • Fe-based HTC cables • ReBCO & Bi-2212 • Funding from CAS 360M RMB/5yrs • A workshop in Hong Kong this Jan. Next one in KEK

22 International Collaboration • Limited international participation for the CDR – Not in any roadmap – No funding support • Hopefully it will be included in the roadmap of Europe, Japan and the US • International advisory board: A lot of Workshop on CEPC-EU edition suggestions May 24-26, 2018, Rome, Italy • MOUs signed with many institutions Next: April 15-17, 2019, Oxford • Welcome recommendation/suggestions

1/3 international participation Next CEPC week: Nov. 12-17, 2018, IHEP 23 Other Activities in China • Accelerator based High experiments Energy Compositeness • Cosmic-ray physics at Extra-dimensions high altitude Supersymmetry Antimatter Higgs CP violation • Space experiments • Underground Neutrinos experiments Precision Standard tests Model

Hadron physics Cosmology & QCD Standard Model of Cosmology Rare decays Dark matter

Axions High precision BEPC: 1984-1988; Upgrade: 2004-2008

BEPCII

BEPC CESRc DORIS I

SPEAR ADONE

0.1cm

8ns 22 mrad 1.5cm 2.5m

> 30 years of experience on e+e- collider ! BESIII Collaboration

EUROPE (16) US (5) Germany: Univ. of Bochum, Munster, Univ. of Hawaii Giessen, GSI,Mainz,HIM Carnegie Mellon Univ. Russia: JINR, Dubna; BINP, Novosibirsk Mongolia (1) Univ. of Minnesota Italy: Univ. of Torino,Frascati Lab, , Ferrara Univ.Inst. of Phys. and tech. Univ. of Rochester Netherland:KVI/Univ. of Groningen Univ. of Indiana Sweden: Uppsala Univ. Korea (1) Turkey: Turkey Accelerator Center Souel Nat. Univ. UK: Manchester, Oxford Japan (1) Pakistan (2) China(37) Tokyo Univ. Univ. of Punjab COMSAT CIIT IHEP, CCAST, Shandong Univ., India (1) Univ. of Sci. and Tech. of China Univ. of Punjab Zhejiang Univ., Huangshan Coll. 64 institutions COMSAT CIIT Huazhong Normal Univ., Wuhan Univ. ~ 400 collaborators Zhengzhou Univ., Henan Normal Univ. Peking Univ., Tsinghua Univ. , Zhongshan Univ.,Nankai Univ. Shanxi Univ., Sichuan Univ., Fudan Suzhou Uni., Hangzhou Normal Uni. Hunan Univ., Liaoning Univ. ,BIPCT Henan Uni. of Sci. & Tech., Neihang Univ. Nanjing Univ., Nanjing Normal Univ. Guangxi Normal Univ., Guangxi Univ. Hong Univ., Hong Kong Chinese Univ. 26 Highlights from BEPCII/BESIII

PRL110, 252001 (2013)  Main Highlights: Zc(3900) – Discovery of Zc(3900): a four- quark states – Discovery of accompany states: 0 Zc (3900), Zc(4025)/Zc(4020), … – Discovery of structures in Y(4260) – Exotic light hadrons: X(1835), X(1870), X(2120), … PRL 106 (2011) 072002 – New decay channels X(2120) X(1835) X(2370) – Charm physics, tau, QCD, etc.  > 20 papers/year, ~ 200 papers in total so far  BESIII will continue to operate for another ~8 years. 27 Future Plan of BEPCII/BESIII

 Up to now, ~ 20-30 papers/year, ~ 200 papers in total  Minor upgrades completed, more under study  BEPCII/BESIII will continue to operate for another ~8 years.

Previous data BESIII present Goal J/y BESII 58M 4.2 B 10 B y’ CLEO:28 M 0.5 B 3B y” CLEO:0.8/fb 2.9/fb 20 /fb Above open charm CLEO:0.6/fb 0.5/fb @ y(4040) 5-10 /fb threshold @ y(4160) 2.3/fb@~4260, 0.5/fb@4360 0.5/fb@4600,1/fb@4420 Scan from 4.19 – 4.28, 10 MeV step, 500 pb-1/point, 7 points R scan & Tau BESII 3.8-4.6 GeV at 105 energy points 2.0-3.1 GeV at 20 energy points Y(2175) 100 pb-1 y(4160) 3 fb-1 Astrophysics in China Since 50’s

Yunnan, 3200m, 60’s Cloud Chamber, 60’s

Cloud chamber, 60’s

Tibet, 5500m, 70’s Tibet, 4200m, 90’s Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory(LHAASO)

 A large air shower array for cosmic- rays and g-astronomy  Construction just started, data taking at ~ 2020  Complementary to CTA:  All the time, all the sky  Time-variant and extended sources  Fast indication for CTA

Sichuan, 4300 m a.s.l.

Main Array: 5195 scintillator detectors every 15 m Water Cherenkov Detector & 1146 –detectors every 30 m 80,000 m2 Cosmic-Ray in Space

AMS02  3D crystal calorimeter for dark matter searches and cosmic-ray physics  Acceptance & energy range  10  Collaboration with Italy, Sweden, Switzerland, …  To be launched in 2025

X0(λ) ∆E/E e/p GF for e sep m2sr HERD (2020) 55(3) 1% 10-6 3.1 Fermi (2008) 10 12% 10-3 0.9 AMS02 (2011) 17 2% 10-6 0.12 DAMPE (2015) 31 1% 10-4 0.3 CREAM (2015) 20(1.5) ------JinPin Underground Laboratory • The deepest underground laboratory in the world: 2400 m • Current experiments: dark matter searches – Xe-based PandaX – Ge-based CDEX Latest PandaX results

PRL 117, 121303 (2016)

32 New Jinpin Underground Laboratory

 Continue dark matter searches  Start double beta-decay experiments

PandaX-III: 0.2-1 t high pressure gaseous 136Xe TPC for  decays Expected 4t PandaX performance 33 Daya Bay Experiment

Redundancy !!!

Solar  Oscillation 1 2 sin 2q12 ~ 0.9  2 q13 ? Atm.   Cross check; Reduce errors by 1/N Oscillation 3 2 Sin 2q23 ~ 1 Results and Prospects

2  sin 2q13 is determined to be non-zero  Precision improved from ~ 20% to ~ 4%  Daya Bay will operate until 2020, precision expected: < 3%  Combined with T2K & Nova, CP Phase is estimated to be ~ -90o

35 The JUNO Experiment

NPP Daya Bay Huizhou Lufeng Yangjiang Taishan Status Operational Planned Planned Under construction Under construction Power 17.4 GW 17.4 GW 17.4 GW 17.4 GW 18.4 GW

Daya Bay Overburden ~ 700 m JUNO Previous site candidate Kaiping, Jiang Men city, Guang Zhou Guangdong Province

2.5 h drive Lufeng Shen Zhen Huizhou NPP NPP Daya Bay Zhu Hai NPP Hong Kong

Macau 53 km 53 km Taishan NPP Yangjiang NPP by 2020: 26.6 GW JUNO Detector and Challenges • Mass Hierarchy • Oscillation – Largest LS detector   20 KamLAND,  40 Borexino parameters – Highest light yield   2 Borexino,  5 KamLAND • Supernova neutrinos • Geo-neutrinos • Solar neutrinos • Double beta decays

 Hugh cavern:  ~ 48m 70m  Largest Acrylic tank: 44.5m  F 35.4m( 13m@SNO)  20 kt LS  Best attenuation length: 25m (15m @ Daya Bay)  20000 20” PMT  Highest photon detection efficiency : 30%*100% = 30% 43.5m (25%*60%=15% @ SuperK) Detector R&D and Construction

 A huge acrylic tank:  R&D and design completed, procedures of manufacturing understood  Prototypes underway  Contract signed  A SS structure to hold the acrylic tank and to mount PMTs  Design completed, contract signed  Issues like tem. change, earth quake, Assembly & installation understood  20 kt liquid scintillator  Completed the optimization of LS for the best light yield and attenuation length  Completed the 20t test of purification: attenuation length> 20 m.  Radio-purity under testing

38 Photomultipliers

 Large, High QE PMT’s is the key to obtain sufficient photons  Efforts started in 2009 to develop MCP-PMT, with a goal of QE > 35%  Partnered with companies and research institutes: NNVC, XIOPM, etc.  Successful development:  NNVC: QE(30%)*DE(100%) > 27%  Hamamatsu: QE(30%)*DE(90%) > 27%  Contract signed(based on quality, availability, cost, risk et al.)  15000 from NNVC, 5000 from Hamamatsu  More than 6000 MCP-PMT from NNVT and 4000 PMT from Hamamatsu  Most of them met our spec.  New tubes from NNVT now has DE > 30%

Hamamatzu: PDE ~ 28% P/V ~ 5 New NNVT: PDE ~ 30% P/V ~ 6

39 ~ 600m vertical shaft, ~1300m sloped tunnel Underground cavern with 50 m diameter, 70 m height

40 41 JUNO Collaboration

17 contries/regions,72 institutions,550 mmebers

Europe (28) America(6) Asia (38) Belgium(1) Italy(8) Germany(7) China(33) US(2) Nankai U. Armenia(1) ULB INFN-Catania FZ Jülich BJ Nor. U. Yerevan Phys. Czech(1) UMD CAGS NCEPU INFN-Frascati RWTH Aachen Pekin U. Inst. Charles U UMD-Geo Chongqing U. INFN-Ferrara TUM SDU Thailand(3) Latvia(1) INFN-Milano U.Hamburg Chile(2) Shanghai JT U. PCUC DGUT Sichuan U. SUT IECS INFN-Mi-Bicocca IKP FZI Jülich CIAE PPRLCU Finland(1) INFN-Padova U.Mainz UTFSM ECUST Brazil(2) Guangxi U. SYSU NARIT U.Oulu INFN-Perugia U.Tuebingen Tsinghua U. Parkistan(1) INFN-Roma 3 Russia(3) PUC-Rio HIT France(5) IHEP UCAS PINSTECH INR Moscow UEL APC Paris U. Of South China USTC JINR CPPM Marseille Ninan U. Jilin U. MSU IPHC Strasbourg Nanjing U. Wuhan U. Subatech Nantes Wuyi U. Slovakia (1) Natl. Chiao-Tung U. CENBG-IN2P3 Natl. Taiwan U. Xi'an JT U. FMPICU Natl. United U. Xiamen U. NUU. Other Neutrino Projects

 There are tens of neutrino projects under T2HK operation, construction and planning  In ten years from now, oscillation will be completely understood: Nova+JUNO+ORCA/PINGU+DUNE will determine the mass hierarchy, while DUNE+T2HK will determine the CP phase  0  decay will be the next breakthrough

 Hints from cosmology: < ~1 eV  Guess from Oscillation: ~1 meV LBNF/DUNE  Katrin will probe to ~ 0.2 eV

eff 2 2 1/2 (m ve) =[Σi | Uei | m vi ]

 0  decay should target for ~ 1meV

2 = | Σi (Uei ) m vi |

42 JUNO-  Insert a balloon filled with 136Xe-loaded LS(or 130Te) into the JUNO detector  collaboration on Te-loaded LS desired  Cosmic-induced backgrounds are removed by cutting a volume around the muon track  Yes, sensitivity scales with the mass

Isotopes Mass(t) ,meV nEXO 136Xe 5 7-22 GERDA 76Ge 1 10-40 Majorana 76Ge 1 10-40 SNO+ 130Te 8 19-46 KamLAND 136Xe 1 ~20 -Zen JUNO- 136Xe 50 4-12

( ) Zhao et al., arXiv: 1610.07143, CPC 41 2017 5 43 Summary • Particle Physics is a great field – Incredible success in the past – More to come in the future • We are now at a critical point: which accelerator is the next one ? – CEPC + SPPC (or FCC_ee+FCC_hh) is the best choice • China may play a very important role: – Great success in the past and a number of new initiatives – Good opportunities: economics, political support, … • Looking forward a closer collaboration