DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2008.04361V4 [Hep-Th] 30 Jan 2021 All Possible Irrelevant Terms with Short-Ranged Kernels, Decaying Like a Stretched Exponential at Large Distances

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2008.04361V4 [Hep-Th] 30 Jan 2021 All Possible Irrelevant Terms with Short-Ranged Kernels, Decaying Like a Stretched Exponential at Large Distances Gentle introduction to rigorous Renormalization Group: a worked fermionic example Alessandro Giuliania;b, Vieri Mastropietroc, Slava Rychkovd;e aDipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Universit`adegli Studi Roma Tre, L.go S. L. Murialdo 1, 00146 Roma - Italy bCentro Linceo Interdisciplinare Beniamino Segre, Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Via della Lungara 10, 00165 Roma - Italy cDipartimento di Matematica, Universit`adegli Studi di Milano, Via Cesare Saldini 50, 20133 Milano - Italy dInstitut des Hautes Etudes´ Scientifiques, Bures-sur-Yvette, France eLaboratoire de Physique de l'Ecole normale sup´erieure, ENS, Universit´ePSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Universit´e,Universit´ede Paris, F-75005 Paris, France Abstract Much of our understanding of critical phenomena is based on the notion of Renormalization Group (RG), but the actual determination of its fixed points is usually based on approximations and truncations, and predictions of physical quantities are often of limited accuracy. The RG fixed points can be however given a fully rigorous and non-perturbative characterization, and this is what is presented here in a model of symplectic fermions with a nonlocal (\long-range") kinetic term depending on a parameter " and a quartic interaction. We identify the Banach space of interactions, which the fixed point belongs to, and we determine it via a convergent approximation scheme. The Banach space is not limited to relevant interactions, but it contains arXiv:2008.04361v4 [hep-th] 30 Jan 2021 all possible irrelevant terms with short-ranged kernels, decaying like a stretched exponential at large distances. As the model shares a number of features in common with φ4 or Ising models, the result can be used as a benchmark to test the validity of truncations and approximations in RG studies. The analysis is based on results coming from Constructive RG to which we provide a tutorial and self-contained introduction. In addition, we prove that the fixed point is analytic in ", a somewhat surprising fact relying on the fermionic nature of the problem. August 2020 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 The model . .6 1.2 Strategy and open questions . .7 1.3 Convergence, analyticity and non-perturbative nature of the fixed point . .8 1.4 Summary . 10 2 Definition of the model and formulation of the problem 11 2.1 Renormalization map . 13 3 The fixed point equation at lowest order 15 4 The Banach space of interactions 17 4.1 Representation of interactions by kernels . 17 4.1.1 Trimmed representation . 18 4.2 Norms . 20 4.2.1 The norm of H` ................................... 20 4.2.2 The norm of a trimmed sequence . 21 5 The renormalization map 22 5.1 Integrating-out map . 22 5.2 Trimming . 24 5.2.1 Equivalent coupling sequences . 25 5.2.2 Trimming map . 25 5.3 Dilatation . 27 5.4 Renormalization map in the trimmed representation . 27 5.5 Fixed point equation . 28 5.6 Norm bounds . 30 `1;:::;`n 5.6.1 Bounds for Sl ................................. 31 `1;:::;`n 5.6.2 Bounds for R` ................................. 32 6 Construction of the fixed point 33 6.1 Key lemma . 33 6.2 Abstract analysis . 35 6.2.1 Complex version of the Abstract Lemma . 38 6.3 Fixed point theorem . 39 6.4 Semigroup property and γ-independence . 41 6.5 Analyticity . 42 7 Proof of Key lemma 43 7.1 Case ` > 8.......................................... 44 7.2 Case ` =6R......................................... 47 7.3 Case ` =4R......................................... 48 7.4 Case ` =2R......................................... 48 (0) 7.5 eν .............................................. 49 (0) 7.6 eλ .............................................. 49 7.7 Possibility of all choices . 50 8 Discussion and open problems 51 8.1 Open questions . 52 8.1.1 Extensions to other nonlocal models . 52 2 8.1.2 Further properties of the RG fixed points . 53 8.1.3 Conformal invariance . 54 8.1.4 Relations with analytic regularization . 55 8.1.5 Increasing the range of " .............................. 55 8.1.6 Extension to non-integer N? To non-integer d?................. 57 8.1.7 Connections to Functional Renormalization Group . 57 8.1.8 Bosonic fixed points . 58 A Gevrey classes and fluctuation propagator bounds 59 A.1 Cutoff function of Gevrey class . 59 A.2 Fluctuation propagator bounds . 61 A.2.1 k-space . 61 A.2.2 x-space . 62 B Details about Heff 63 C Trimming details 64 D Determinant bounds for fermionic expectations 67 D.1 Simple expectations . 67 D.2 Connected expectations . 69 D.3 Brydges-Battle-Federbush (BBF) formula . 71 D.4 Gawedzki-Kupiainen-Lesniewski (GKL) bound . 75 D.5 Bound on the number of anchored trees . 78 `1;:::;`n E Proof of Sl norm bound 78 (1) (2) F Estimates of ∆k ; ∆k 80 G One-loop coefficients I1 and I2 82 H Finite volume and non-perturbative validity of Heff 84 I Fixed point in a formal power series expansion 90 J Fixed point via the tree expansion 93 J.1 On the flow of the effective couplings . 98 K Rigorously constructed bosonic fixed points 99 1 Introduction Renormalization group (RG) is a pillar of theoretical physics, explaining how long-distance collective behavior emerges from microscopic models. Critical phenomena are thus understood in terms of RG fixed points (Wilson [1{3]) and universality is explained in terms of basins of attractions. While this beautiful picture qualitatively works very well, quantitative applications often lead to practical diffi- culties. To compute critical exponents, one typically does perturbation theory in a small parameter, like = 4 d in the -expansion [4]. The accuracy of this procedure is limited by the proliferation of Feynman− diagrams, and by the slow convergence of Borel-resummed series (while without resum- mation it normally diverges). As a consequence, predictions of critical exponents using perturbative RG [5,6] are often less accurate than lattice Monte Carlo simulations or the conformal bootstrap [7]. It should be stressed that Wilson did not consider RG limited to situations with a small coupling. Two strongly coupled RG examples can be found in [2]. One is his famous solution of the Kondo problem. The other is less known but no less impressive: an RG calculation for the 2D Ising model in a space of 217 couplings, concluding that \one can do precise calculations using pure renormalization 3 group methods with the only approximations being based on locality." Other developments in theoretical physics suggest, indirectly, that Wilson ideas are non-perturbatively correct. We can mention here exact results in two-dimensional field theory (see e.g. [8]), obtained by conformal field theory, integrable models, exact S-matrix bootstrap etc., which have provided many examples of exact non-perturbative RG flows, never finding any inconsistency with Wilsonian expectations. In higher dimensions, exact results in supersymmetric theories (see e.g. [9]) as well as the gauge-gravity duality considerations (see e.g. [10,11]) have always confirmed Wilson ideas. It is therefore somewhat surprising that the most straightforward interpretation of Wilson's vision, as a non-perturbative machine which would allow non-perturbatively and with an essentially unlimited precision to compute the properties of any RG fixed point of interest, has not so far been achieved. It is fair to say that this was not for the lack of trying, see e.g. [12] for the early attempts. Two notable, although not fully successful, attempts have been the Functional Renormalization Group (FRG) [13, 14] and Tensor Network Renormalization (TNR) [15{17]. The FRG calculations include couplings with arbitrary powers of fluctuating field, but only up to some finite derivative order. Unfortunately, with more derivatives, FRG results tend to become more and more sensitive to the parameters specifying the regulating function [18, 19]. This has been traced to increasing violations of conformal invariance, except at some special parameter values satisfying a \principle of minimal sensitivity" [20]. It remains to be understood why the convergence to the fixed point does not hold more robustly in FRG. As for the TNR, it works well for simple 2D lattice models such as the 2D Ising model but hasn't been yet as effective in higher dimensions. So, in spite of these attempts, although it is generally believed that the non-perturbative Wilsonian RG fixed points do exist, at present they often remain Platonic objects, confined to the world of ideas and accessible to us only via approximations of rather limited accuracy. Take e.g. the RG fixed point for the 3D Ising model. If it exists, which Banach space does it belong to? Can we access it via a provably convergent approximation scheme? At the moment these questions are wide open. Note that Wilson believed in the Ising RG fixed point very concretely: as a fixed-point Hamiltonian invariant under a Kadanoff block-spin transformation. As mentioned above, for 2D Ising, he found an approximate fixed-point Hamiltonian numerically, truncating to a space of 217 lattice spin inter- actions [2]. But the convergence of his scheme has never been proven, nor has it been implemented in 3D. Incidentally, Wilson did worry about rigorous convergence properties of RG maps; e.g. in [21] a model RG transformation was shown to be convergent for a rescaling parameter larger than 4 106. × Of course, as already mentioned, there are nowadays other methods to get precise values of critical exponents, most notably the conformal bootstrap [7]. However, this does not mean that the RG should be abandoned. First, RG is more general than the conformal bootstrap, since many RG fixed points important for physics do not have conformal invariance, such as any fixed point involving time evolution or relaxation, and having a dynamical critical exponent z = 1. Second, it is quite possible that there exist much better RG implementations, and we just haven't6 found them yet.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Radiative Corrections in Curved Spacetime and Physical Implications to the Power Spectrum and Trispectrum for Different Inflationary Models
    Radiative Corrections in Curved Spacetime and Physical Implications to the Power Spectrum and Trispectrum for different Inflationary Models Dissertation zur Erlangung des mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades Doctor rerum naturalium der Georg-August-Universit¨atG¨ottingen Im Promotionsprogramm PROPHYS der Georg-August University School of Science (GAUSS) vorgelegt von Simone Dresti aus Locarno G¨ottingen,2018 Betreuungsausschuss: Prof. Dr. Laura Covi, Institut f¨urTheoretische Physik, Universit¨atG¨ottingen Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren, Institut f¨urTheoretische Physik, Universit¨atG¨ottingen Prof. Dr. Dorothea Bahns, Mathematisches Institut, Universit¨atG¨ottingen Miglieder der Prufungskommission:¨ Referentin: Prof. Dr. Laura Covi, Institut f¨urTheoretische Physik, Universit¨atG¨ottingen Korreferentin: Prof. Dr. Dorothea Bahns, Mathematisches Institut, Universit¨atG¨ottingen Weitere Mitglieder der Prufungskommission:¨ Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren, Institut f¨urTheoretische Physik, Universit¨atG¨ottingen Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein, Institut f¨urTheoretische Physik, Universit¨atG¨ottingen Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer, Institut f¨urAstrophysik, Universit¨atG¨ottingen Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey, II. Physikalisches Institut, Universit¨atG¨ottingen Tag der mundlichen¨ Prufung:¨ Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2018 Ai miei nonni Marina, Palmira e Pierino iv ABSTRACT In a quantum field theory with a time-dependent background, as in an expanding uni- verse, the time-translational symmetry is broken. We therefore expect loop corrections to cosmological observables to be time-dependent after renormalization for interacting fields. In this thesis we compute and discuss such radiative corrections to the primordial spectrum and higher order spectra in simple inflationary models. We investigate both massless and massive virtual fields, and we disentangle the time dependence caused by the background and by the initial state that is set to the Bunch-Davies vacuum at the beginning of inflation.
    [Show full text]
  • Scalar Quantum Electrodynamics
    A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works. John Gall 17 Scalar Quantum Electrodynamics In nature, there exist scalar particles which are charged and are therefore coupled to the electromagnetic field. In three spatial dimensions, an important nonrelativistic example is provided by superconductors. The phenomenon of zero resistance at low temperature can be explained by the formation of so-called Cooper pairs of electrons of opposite momentum and spin. These behave like bosons of spin zero and charge q =2e, which are held together in some metals by the electron-phonon interaction. Many important predictions of experimental data can be derived from the Ginzburg- Landau theory of superconductivity [1]. The relativistic generalization of this theory to four spacetime dimensions is of great importance in elementary particle physics. In that form it is known as scalar quantum electrodynamics (scalar QED). 17.1 Action and Generating Functional The Ginzburg-Landau theory is a three-dimensional euclidean quantum field theory containing a complex scalar field ϕ(x)= ϕ1(x)+ iϕ2(x) (17.1) coupled to a magnetic vector potential A. The scalar field describes bound states of pairs of electrons, which arise in a superconductor at low temperatures due to an attraction coming from elastic forces. The detailed mechanism will not be of interest here; we only note that the pairs are bound in an s-wave and a spin singlet state of charge q =2e. Ignoring for a moment the magnetic interactions, the ensemble of these bound states may be described, in the neighborhood of the superconductive 4 transition temperature Tc, by a complex scalar field theory of the ϕ -type, by a euclidean action 2 3 1 m g 2 E = d x ∇ϕ∗∇ϕ + ϕ∗ϕ + (ϕ∗ϕ) .
    [Show full text]
  • Asymptotically Flat, Spherical, Self-Interacting Scalar, Dirac and Proca Stars
    S S symmetry Article Asymptotically Flat, Spherical, Self-Interacting Scalar, Dirac and Proca Stars Carlos A. R. Herdeiro and Eugen Radu * Departamento de Matemática da Universidade de Aveiro and Centre for Research and Development in Mathematics and Applications (CIDMA), Campus de Santiago, 3810-183 Aveiro, Portugal; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 14 November 2020; Accepted: 1 December 2020; Published: 8 December 2020 Abstract: We present a comparative analysis of the self-gravitating solitons that arise in the Einstein–Klein–Gordon, Einstein–Dirac, and Einstein–Proca models, for the particular case of static, spherically symmetric spacetimes. Differently from the previous study by Herdeiro, Pombo and Radu in 2017, the matter fields possess suitable self-interacting terms in the Lagrangians, which allow for the existence of Q-ball-type solutions for these models in the flat spacetime limit. In spite of this important difference, our analysis shows that the high degree of universality that was observed by Herdeiro, Pombo and Radu remains, and various spin-independent common patterns are observed. Keywords: solitons; boson stars; Dirac stars 1. Introduction and Motivation 1.1. General Remarks The (modern) idea of solitons, as extended particle-like configurations, can be traced back (at least) to Lord Kelvin, around one and half centuries ago, who proposed that atoms are made of vortex knots [1]. However, the first explicit example of solitons in a relativistic field theory was found by Skyrme [2,3], (almost) one hundred years later. The latter, dubbed Skyrmions, exist in a model with four (real) scalars that are subject to a constraint.
    [Show full text]
  • A Solvable Tensor Field Theory Arxiv:1903.02907V2 [Math-Ph]
    A Solvable Tensor Field Theory R. Pascalie∗ Universit´ede Bordeaux, LaBRI, CNRS UMR 5800, Talence, France, EU Mathematisches Institut der Westf¨alischen Wilhelms-Universit¨at,M¨unster,Germany, EU August 3, 2020 Abstract We solve the closed Schwinger-Dyson equation for the 2-point function of a tensor field theory with a quartic melonic interaction, in terms of Lambert's W-function, using a perturbative expansion and Lagrange-B¨urmannresummation. Higher-point functions are then obtained recursively. 1 Introduction Tensor models have regained a considerable interest since the discovery of their large N limit (see [1], [2], [3] or the book [4]). Recently, tensor models have been related in [5] and [6], to the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model [7], [8], [9], [10], which is a promising toy-model for understanding black holes through holography (see also [11], [12], the lectures [13] and the review [14]). In this paper we study a specific type of tensor field theory (TFT) 1. More precisely, we consider a U(N)-invariant tensor models whose kinetic part is modified to include a Laplacian- like operator (this operator is a discrete Laplacian in the Fourier transformed space of the tensor index space). This type of tensor model has originally been used to implement renormalization techniques for tensor models (see [16], the review [17] or the thesis [18] and references within) and has also been studied as an SYK-like TFT [19]. Recently, the functional Renormalization Group (FRG) as been used in [20] to investigate the existence of a universal continuum limit in tensor models, see also the review [21].
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2003.01034V1 [Hep-Th] 2 Mar 2020 Im Oe.Frta Esntelna Oe a Etogta Ge a Large As the Thought in Be Solved Be Can Can Model Models Linear These the One
    Inhomogeneous states in two dimensional linear sigma model at large N A. Pikalov1,2∗ 1Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny 141700, Russia 2Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow, Russia (Dated: March 3, 2020) In this note we consider inhomogeneous solutions of two-dimensional linear sigma model in the large N limit. These solutions are similar to the ones found recently in two-dimensional CP N sigma model. The solution exists only for some range of coupling constant. We calculate energy of the solutions as function of parameters of the model and show that at some value of the coupling constant it changes sign signaling a possible phase transition. The case of the nonlinear model at finite temperature is also discussed. The free energy of the inhomogeneous solution is shown to change sign at some critical temperature. I. INTRODUCTION Two-dimensional linear sigma model is a theory of N real scalar fields and quartic O(N) symmetric interaction. The model has two dimensionful parameters: mass of the particles and coupling constant. In the limit of infinite coupling one can obtain the nonlinear O(N) arXiv:2003.01034v1 [hep-th] 2 Mar 2020 sigma model. For that reason the linear model can be thought as a generalization of the nonlinear one. These models can be solved in the large N limit, see [1] for a review. In turn O(N) sigma model is quite similar to the CP N sigma model. Recently the large N CP N sigma model was considered on a finite interval with various boundary conditions [2–8] and on circle [9–12].
    [Show full text]
  • Physics 215C: Particles and Fields Spring 2019
    Physics 215C: Particles and Fields Spring 2019 Lecturer: McGreevy These lecture notes live here. Please email corrections to mcgreevy at physics dot ucsd dot edu. Last updated: 2021/04/20, 14:28:40 1 Contents 0.1 Introductory remarks for the third quarter................4 0.2 Sources and acknowledgement.......................7 0.3 Conventions.................................8 1 Anomalies9 2 Effective field theory 20 2.1 A parable on integrating out degrees of freedom............. 20 2.2 Introduction to effective field theory.................... 25 2.3 The color of the sky............................. 30 2.4 Fermi theory of Weak Interactions..................... 32 2.5 Loops in EFT................................ 33 2.6 The Standard Model as an EFT...................... 39 2.7 Superconductors.............................. 42 2.8 Effective field theory of Fermi surfaces.................. 47 3 Geometric and topological terms in field theory actions 58 3.1 Coherent state path integrals for bosons................. 58 3.2 Coherent state path integral for fermions................. 66 3.3 Path integrals for spin systems....................... 73 3.4 Topological terms from integrating out fermions............. 86 3.5 Pions..................................... 89 4 Field theory of spin systems 99 4.1 Transverse-Field Ising Model........................ 99 4.2 Ferromagnets and antiferromagnets..................... 131 4.3 The beta function for 2d non-linear sigma models............ 136 4.4 CP1 representation and large-N ...................... 138 5 Duality 148 5.1 XY transition from superfluid to Mott insulator, and T-duality..... 148 6 Conformal field theory 158 6.1 The stress tensor and conformal invariance (abstract CFT)....... 160 6.2 Radial quantization............................. 166 6.3 Back to general dimensions......................... 172 7 Duality, part 2 179 7.1 (2+1)-d XY is dual to (2+1)d electrodynamics.............
    [Show full text]
  • Adiabatic Limits and Renormalization in Quantum Spacetime
    DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN MATEMATICA XXXII CICLO DEL CORSO DI DOTTORATO Adiabatic limits and renormalization in quantum spacetime Aleksei Bykov A.A. 2019/2020 Docente Guida/Tutor: Prof. D. Guido Relatore: Prof. G. Morsella Coordinatore: Prof. A. Braides Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Doplicher-Fredenhagen-Roberts Quantum Spacetime 11 2.1 Construction and basic facts . 11 2.2 Quantum fields on the DFR QST and the role of Qµν . 12 2.2.1 More general quantum fields in DFR QST . 13 2.3 Optimally localised states and the quantum diagonal map . 17 3 Perturbation theory for QFT and its non-local generalization 21 3.1 Hamiltonian perturbation theory . 22 3.1.1 Ordinary QFT . 22 3.1.2 Non-local case: fixing HI ............................. 26 3.1.3 Hamiltonian approach: fixing Hint ........................ 35 3.2 Lagrangian perturbation theories . 38 3.3 Yang-Feldman quantizaion . 41 3.4 LSZ reduction . 41 4 Feynman rules for non-local Hamiltonian Perturbation theory 45 5 Lagrangian reformulation of the Hamiltonian Feynman rules 52 6 Corrected propagator 57 7 Adiabatic limit 61 7.1 Weak adiabatic limit and the LSZ reduction . 61 7.1.1 Existence of the weak adiabatic limit . 61 7.1.2 Feynman rules from LSZ reduction . 64 7.2 Strong adiabatic limit . 65 8 Renormalization 68 8.1 Formal renormalization . 68 8.2 The physical renormalization . 71 8.2.1 Dispersion relation renormalisation . 72 8.2.2 Field strength renormalization . 72 8.3 Conluding remarks on renormalisation . 73 9 Conclusions 75 9.1 Summary of the main results . 75 9.2 Outline of further directions .
    [Show full text]
  • The Higgs Trilinear Coupling and the Scale of New Physics
    The Higgs Trilinear Coupling and the Scale of New Physics Spencer Chang Department of Physics and Institute of Theoretical Science University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403 and Department of Physics National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, ROC Markus A. Luty Center for Quantum Mathematics and Physics (QMAP) University of California, Davis, California 95616 Abstract We consider modifications of the Higgs potential due to new physics at high energy scales. These upset delicate cancellations predicted by the Standard Model for processes involving Higgs bosons and longitudinal gauge bosons, and lead to a breakdown of the theory at high energies. We focus on modifications of the Higgs trilinear coupling and use the violation of tree- level unitarity as an estimate of the scale where the theory breaks down. We obtain a completely model-independent bound of <∼ 13 TeV for an order-1 modification of the trilinear. We argue that this bound can be saturated only in fine-tuned models, and the scale of new physics is likely to be much lower. The most stringent bounds are obtained from amplitudes involving multiparticle states that are not conventional scattering states. Our results arXiv:1902.05556v2 [hep-ph] 31 Mar 2020 show that a future determination of the Higgs cubic coupling can point to a well-defined scale of new physics that can be targeted and explored at future colliders. 1 Introduction Many of the couplings of the 125 GeV Higgs boson to gauge bosons and fermions have been measured at the 10% level and agree with the predictions of the Standard Model [1, 2].
    [Show full text]
  • Homework 8 – Due Friday, Nov 17Th – 8A,8B,8C
    Homework 8 – due Friday, Nov 17th – 8A,8B,8C (8A) Field redefinitions and scattering Consider a seemingly complicated theory with the basic complex scalar field B (note that |x|2 = x∗x): g L = |(∂ B)(1 + gB)|2 − m2|B + B2|2 µ 2 1. Divide the Lagrangian for B into a free part and interaction terms. Compute the elastic N + N¯ → N + N¯ scattering amplitude in the tree level approximation, imagining that you follow the LSZ formula. Tree level means that there are no loops and therefore you don’t need any counterterms. However, you will need a g2 vertex diagram as well as a diagram with two g cubic vertices. Also, you will need derivative interactions. With derivative interactions, it is not true that L = −H, and also, there are problems with commuting the time-derivatives through the normal-ordering symbol. Believe me that these two problems cancel and can be collectively ignored, as will be clear from Feynman’s path integral formulation later. Assume L = −H and be sloppy about permuting the T , ∂µ symbols. 2. Now pretend that someone brings you a secret message that says: g ψ = B + B2 2 Using this field redefinition, guess what is the Lagrangian for ψ – it is very simple! – and verify it by an actual calculation. What is the scattering amplitude for ψ quanta? This question should be supersimple. Use this simple answer as a hint to fix any combinatorial errors in the calculation with B if you have errors. 3. If you do the same calculation in the B variables or the ψ variables, will the off-shell Green’s functions of B and those of ψ be equal (yes/no)? Should they be (yes/no)? Should the on-shell amplitudes be equal (yes/no)? Comment: An advantage of the LSZ formalism is that it doesn’t matter whether you assign a field like B or a field like ψ to the particle.
    [Show full text]
  • Lectures on Quantum Field Theory
    Lectures on Quantum Field Theory Aleksandar R. Bogojevi´c1 Institute of Physics P. O. Box 57 11000 Belgrade, Yugoslavia March, 1998 1Email: [email protected] ii Contents 1 Linearity and Combinatorics 1 1.1 Schwinger–DysonEquations. 1 1.2 GeneratingFunctionals. 3 1.3 FreeFieldTheory ........................... 6 2 Further Combinatoric Structure 7 2.1 ClassicalFieldTheory ......................... 7 2.2 TheEffectiveAction .......................... 8 2.3 PathIntegrals.............................. 10 3 Using the Path Integral 15 3.1 Semi-ClassicalExpansion . 15 3.2 WardIdentities ............................. 18 4 Fermions 21 4.1 GrassmannNumbers.......................... 21 5 Euclidean Field Theory 27 5.1 Thermodynamics ............................ 30 5.2 WickRotation ............................. 31 6 Ferromagnets and Phase Transitions 33 6.1 ModelsofFerromagnets . 33 6.2 TheMeanFieldApproximation. 34 6.3 TransferMatrices............................ 35 6.4 Landau–Ginsburg Theory . 36 6.5 TowardsLoopExpansion . 38 7 The Propagator 41 7.1 ScalarPropagator ........................... 41 7.2 RandomWalk.............................. 43 iii iv CONTENTS 8 The Propagator Continued 47 8.1 The Yukawa Potential . 47 8.2 VirtualParticles ............................ 49 9 From Operators to Path Integrals 53 9.1 HamiltonianPathIntegral. 53 9.2 LagrangianPathIntegral . 55 9.3 QuantumFieldTheory. 57 10 Path Integral Surprises 59 10.1 Paths that don’t Contribute . 59 10.2 Lagrangian Measure from SD Equations . 62 11 Classical Symmetry 67 11.1 NoetherTechnique . 67 11.2 Energy-Momentum Tensors Galore . 70 12 Symmetry Breaking 73 12.1 GoldstoneBosons............................ 73 12.2 TheHiggsMechanism . 77 13 Effective Action to One Loop 81 13.1 TheEffectivePotential. 81 13.2 The O(N)Model............................ 86 14 Solitons 89 14.1 Perturbative vs. Semi-Classical . 89 14.2 ClassicalSolitons ............................ 90 14.3 The φ4 Kink .............................
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Field Theory and Particle Physics
    Quantum Field Theory and Particle Physics Badis Ydri Département de Physique, Faculté des Sciences Université d’Annaba Annaba, Algerie 2 YDRI QFT Contents 1 Introduction and References 1 I Path Integrals, Gauge Fields and Renormalization Group 3 2 Path Integral Quantization of Scalar Fields 5 2.1 FeynmanPathIntegral. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 2.2 ScalarFieldTheory............................... 9 2.2.1 PathIntegral .............................. 9 2.2.2 The Free 2 Point Function . 12 − 2.2.3 Lattice Regularization . 13 2.3 TheEffectiveAction .............................. 16 2.3.1 Formalism................................ 16 2.3.2 Perturbation Theory . 20 2.3.3 Analogy with Statistical Mechanics . 22 2.4 The O(N) Model................................ 23 2.4.1 The 2 Point and 4 Point Proper Vertices . 24 − − 2.4.2 Momentum Space Feynman Graphs . 25 2.4.3 Cut-off Regularization . 27 2.4.4 Renormalization at 1 Loop...................... 29 − 2.5 Two-Loop Calculations . 31 2.5.1 The Effective Action at 2 Loop ................... 31 − 2.5.2 The Linear Sigma Model at 2 Loop ................. 32 − 2.5.3 The 2 Loop Renormalization of the 2 Point Proper Vertex . 35 − − 2.5.4 The 2 Loop Renormalization of the 4 Point Proper Vertex . 40 − − 2.6 Renormalized Perturbation Theory . 42 2.7 Effective Potential and Dimensional Regularization . .......... 45 2.8 Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking . 49 2.8.1 Example: The O(N) Model ...................... 49 2.8.2 Glodstone’s Theorem . 55 3 Path Integral Quantization of Dirac and Vector Fields 57 3.1 FreeDiracField ................................ 57 3.1.1 Canonical Quantization . 57 3.1.2 Fermionic Path Integral and Grassmann Numbers . 58 4 YDRI QFT 3.1.3 The Electron Propagator .
    [Show full text]
  • The Standard Model of Particle Physics and Beyond
    Context Relativity - gauge theories The Standard Model of particle physics Beyond the Standard Model Summary The Standard Model of particle physics and beyond. Benjamin Fuks & Michel Rausch de Traubenberg IPHC Strasbourg / University of Strasbourg. [email protected] & [email protected] Slides available on http://www.cern.ch/fuks/esc.php 6-13 July 2011 The Standard Model of particle physics and beyond. Benjamin Fuks & Michel Rausch de Traubenberg - 1 Context Relativity - gauge theories The Standard Model of particle physics Beyond the Standard Model Summary Outline. 1 Context. 2 Special relativity and gauge theories. Action and symmetries. Poincar´eand Lorentz algebras and their representations. Relativistic wave equations. Gauge symmetries - Yang-Mills theories - symmetry breaking. 3 Construction of the Standard Model. Quantum Electrodynamics (QED). Scattering theory - Calculation of a squared matrix element. Weak interactions. The electroweak theory. Quantum Chromodynamics. 4 Beyond the Standard Model of particle physics. The Standard Model: advantages and open questions. Grand unified theories. Supersymmetry. Extra-dimensional theories. String theory. 5 Summary. The Standard Model of particle physics and beyond. Benjamin Fuks & Michel Rausch de Traubenberg - 2 Context Relativity - gauge theories The Standard Model of particle physics Beyond the Standard Model Summary Building blocks describing matter. Atom compositness. * Neutrons. * Protons. * Electrons. Proton and neutron compositness. * Naively: up and down quarks. * In reality: dynamical objects made of • Valence and sea quarks. • Gluons [see below...]. Beta decays. − * n ! p + e +ν ¯e . * Needs for a neutrino. The Standard Model of particle physics and beyond. Benjamin Fuks & Michel Rausch de Traubenberg - 3 Context Relativity - gauge theories The Standard Model of particle physics Beyond the Standard Model Summary Three families of fermionic particles [Why three?].
    [Show full text]