Dunedin City Council Land Information Memorandum 88367

Issued in accordance with Section 44A of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987

Should you require further clarification of any of the information listed in this report, please phone our Customer Services Agency on 03 477 4000.

This Land Information Memoranda (LIM) has been prepared in accordance with Section 44A of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987. It contains only information obtained from the records held by the Dunedin City Council as at 2 October 2020

The Dunedin City Council has not carried out an inspection of the land and/or buildings for the purposes of preparing this LIM. The Dunedin City Council records may not show illegal or unauthorised buildings or works on the land. Accordingly this report may not necessarily reflect the current status of the property. Examples of situations which affect the property but are not recorded in this report include: unauthorised work not known to Council and breaches of Consents or Licences that are not the subject of a formal Requisition or Notice.

The applicant is solely responsible for ensuring that the land or any building or works on the land is suitable for a particular purpose. The applicant should check the Records of Title as this report may not include information that is registered on the Records of Title. The Records of Title may record further information or obligations relating to the land.

Further information about this property may be available from other agencies such as the Otago Regional Council, Nova Gas, Telecom New Zealand (Chorus) or Delta Utility Services Limited.

PROPERTY ADDRESS

7 Harden Street Dunedin

LIM Applicant Erin Susannah Mahoney Print Date 02-Oct-2020

CONTENTS

Property Details Rates Details Building, Plumbing and Drainage Site Hazards Hazardous Substances Environmental Health Licensing City Planning Transportation Water Waste Appendix

.

Printed on 02-Oct-2020 Page 1

PROPERTY DETAILS

Property ID 5014371 Address 7 Harden Street Dunedin Parcels LOT 4 DP 5487

Rubbish Day Monday

RATES DETAILS

Rate Account 2014371

Address 7 Harden Street Dunedin

Valuation Number 26780-62900

Latest Valuation Details Capital Value $400,000 Land Value $155,000 Value of Improvements $245,000 Area (Hectares) 0.0506HA Units of Use 1

Current Rates Current Rating Year Starting 01-Jul-2020 Dunedin City Council Rates $2,310.40

Rates Outstanding for Year $1,723.44

For further explanation on the rate account, or to enquire about information referred to on this page, please contact Rates Staff between 8:30am and 5:00pm weekdays at the enquiries counter on the Ground floor of the Civic Centre, 50 The Octagon, Dunedin, or by phoning 477 4000.

Printed on 02-Oct-2020 Page 2

BUILDING, PLUMBING AND DRAINAGE

Public Sewer sheets. WARNING. Please note that public sewer reticulation sheets are scaled in either Imperial feet or Metric metres. Please check with the Duty Drainage Inspector if in doubt.

Dunedin City Council Private Drainage plans incomplete. WARNING. The Dunedin City Council's private drainage records (plans) prior to 1 January 1993 may be incomplete or not clearly recorded. Owners therefore are advised to carry out work with due care to avoid damage to any private drain not detailed because of the lack of information filed in the Council's records.

Building and Drainage Information

Council Storm Water & Foul Sewer Connections available. There is Council Storm Water outfalls and Foul Sewer Connections adjacent to this land, to which buildings within this land may connect. A plan of these is attached.

Private Storm Water Drains servicing existing buildings There are Private Storm Water drains servicing existing buildings on this land.

Private Foul Drains servicing existing buildings There are Private Foul drains servicing existing buildings on this land.

Building and Drainage Consents There are no records of any Building Consents for this property.

Building and Drainage Permits Building Permits were issued prior to the introduction of the Building Act 1992. Code Compliance Certificates were not required or issued for permits.

H-1947-29307 AAB19470184 4565 - Erect Dwelling, (Leckie). The permit was lodged on 28-Mar-1947.

H-1949-32820 AAB19490316 7766 - Erect Workshop, (Leckie). The permit was lodged on 24-May-1949.

H-1952-39393 AAB19520270 12424 - Erect Shed and Glasshouse, (Leckie). The permit was lodged on 08-Feb-1952.

H-1960-54031 AAB19600155 4467 - Addition and Alteration to Dwelling, (Murray). The permit was lodged on 03-Jun-1960.

H-1961-55989 AAB19610154 6158 - Erect Carport, (Murray). The permit was lodged on 15-May-1961.

H-1973-76034 AAB19730154 7557 - Addition to Dwelling, (Corkin). The permit was lodged on 01-Jun-1973.

H-1948-164082 AAD19480403 E4641 - Plumbing and Drainage, (Leckie). The permit was lodged on 28-Apr-1948.

H-1966-189666 AAD19660501 H1807 - Repair Drainage, No Plan (Corkin). The permit was lodged on 14-Oct-1966.

Printed on 02-Oct-2020 Page 3

H-1946-161508 AAD19460168 E1760 - Plumbing & Drainage for New Building, (Stone Construction Company). The permit was lodged on 27-Mar-1946.

For further explanation on the current status of any consent, or to enquire about information referred to on this page, please contact Building Control Staff between 8:30am and 5:00pm weekdays at the enquiries counter on the Ground floor of the Civic Centre, 50 The Octagon, Dunedin, or by phoning 477 4000.

.

HAZARDS

SITE HAZARDS

Alluvial Fans - Active - Floodwater The property is located within an area with active floodwater alluvial fans. Active fans are those on which flooding, deposition and/or erosion are possible within the next 500 years. This information has been sourced from Opus International Consultants (2009): Otago alluvial fans project regional review. Further information, including a copy of the report is available from https://www.orc.govt.nz/media/2968/otago-alluvials-project- regional-review-executive-summary.pdf https://www.orc.govt.nz/media/2969/otago-alluvials-project-regional-review-council- committee-report.pdf

Water of Leith Flood Hazard This property has been identified as lying within an area identified in the Lindsay Creek Flood Hazard Report (Originally published January 1999, and updated in 2004). Further, the Otago Regional Council provided a report on Flood hazard of Dunedin's urban streams (June 2014) source report

This flood hazard area is derived from the Leith Stream, Lindsay Creek and their tributaries. These watercourses have been extensively modified from their natural form.

Areas located within this flood hazard area maybe subject to floodwater inundation however, historical channel works do offer varying levels of flood protection.

For further details on this hazard including the limitation and assumptions made when deriving this information please see the Otago Regional Council.

Land stability – subsidence has been identified as hazard on this property please refer to ‘Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfills in the Otago Region’.

The Otago Regional Council has produced a number of reports for the Dunedin City District which outline areas affected by natural hazards including slippage, flooding, subsidence and inundation.

These reports are publicly available and can be accessed here: https://www.orc.govt.nz/plans-policies-reports/reports-and- publications/natural-hazards

These reports do not provide property specific information, and may not describe all natural hazards that affect the land that is the subject of this LIM report. We recommend that in addition to reading these reports, that you seek independent advice about how this property may be affected by natural hazards including natural hazards that are not described in the reports produced by the Otago Regional Council.

Printed on 02-Oct-2020 Page 4

Otago Regional Council - Natural Hazards Database The characteristics of general natural hazards in the vicinity of this property are also available on the Otago Regional Council’s Natural Hazards Database.

http://www.orc.govt.nz/Information-and-Services/Natural-Hazards/hazards/

HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES

WARNING – Change in legislation and management of hazardous substances On 1 April 2004, all Dunedin City Council Dangerous Goods Licences expired. From this date they became the responsibility of the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) under the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996. All new licences for hazardous substances were issued by independent Test Certifiers approved by the EPA. The Council no longer holds current information on the use of hazardous substances at these premises and hazardous substances may be present without the Council’s knowledge. The Council was advised by the EPA in 2016 that Worksafe had taken over responsibility for managing Location Test certificates under the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996. The EPA no longer hold any information in relation to Location Test Certificates If you have any questions, please contact Worksafe.

Contaminated Site, Hazardous Substances and Dangerous Goods Information

No information

.

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH

Noise complaints have been received by Environmental Health regarding this property. Should the property be purchased for rental purposes then noise control is considered the landlords responsibility as well as the tenants and in the event of any such offences, the landlord could also be liable to a fine.

LICENSING

Health Licensing There are no records of any Health Licences for this property.

Liquor Licensing There are no records of any Liquor Licences for this property.

.

CITY PLANNING

The information provided with this LIM on District Plan requirements and resource consents has been verified by City Planning in relation to the subject property only. All information included in relation to other land surrounding the site is indicative.

Printed on 02-Oct-2020 Page 5

Accuracy of Boundaries Knowing the true location of the property boundaries on the ground is important in determining what can be carried out on the land under the District Plan and in determining whether the current activity complies with the District Plan or any resource consent. Please note that the Council’s aerial photographs may not accurately depict the extent of the property. The Record of Title for the site should be checked in the first instance. A surveyor may need to be consulted to establish the true location of the title boundaries on the ground.

Access to Site The legality of any access to the site is important in determining what can be carried out on the land under the District Plan and in determining whether the current activity complies with the District Plan or any resource consent. It is recommended that the Record of Title and/or a lawyer be consulted regarding the legality of any legal and/or physical access to the site (and the maintenance thereof).

Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 The Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 applies in addition to any protection provided to a building or site by the District Plan. The Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 makes it unlawful for any person to destroy, or modify the whole or any part of an archaeological site, whether or not the land on which the site is located is designated, or a resource or building consent has been issued, without the prior authority of Heritage New Zealand. The Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 defines an archaeological site as a place associated with pre-1900 activity, where there may be evidence relating to the history of New Zealand. Pre-1900 buildings are considered archaeological sites under the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 and are also often associated with subsurface archaeological remains that provide evidence of pre- existing use of the site. Council records may not necessarily identify the precise date upon which an existing building was constructed. Contact the Dunedin office of Heritage New Zealand for further information: [email protected] ; 03 477 9871.

Resource Management (National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health) Regulations 2011 The Resource Management (National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health) Regulations 2011 came into force on 1 January 2012. The National Environmental Standard applies to any piece of land on which an activity or industry described in the current edition of the Hazardous Activities and Industries List (HAIL) is being undertaken, has been undertaken or is more likely than not to have been undertaken. (The current edition of the HAIL is available on the Ministry for the Environment website at www.mfe.govt.nz.) Activities on HAIL sites may need to comply with permitted activity conditions specified in the National Environmental Standard and/or might require resource consent. (The Otago Regional Council should also be consulted for any rules in might have in regards to the use or development of contaminated sites.)

If a person wishes to establish whether a piece of land has had hazardous activities or industries conducted on it, and thus whether activities on that land are controlled by the National Environmental Standard, then the person must pay for a review of the information about the land held by the Council, or pay for a suitably qualified and experienced practitioner to undertake a preliminary site inspection. Formal confirmation from the Council that resource consent is not required under the National Environmental Standard can only be given through a certificate of compliance application.

Consent Notices There are no Consent Notices recorded for this property. It is recommended that the applicant check the Record of Title for any notices or covenants that may affect the property.

Printed on 02-Oct-2020 Page 6

District Plan Information Dunedin currently has an Operative Dunedin City District Plan, and the Proposed Second Generation Dunedin City District Plan (2GP). Accordingly, both of these plans may affect the development potential of this site and surrounding properties.

As a general principle, rules in the 2GP must be considered along with the rules of the Operative District Plan until such time as the rules of the 2GP become operative, or are treated as operative. The policies and objectives of both plans should also be considered.

The 2GP was publicly notified on Saturday 26 September 2015. The submission period closed on Tuesday 24 November 2015. Decisions on the 2GP were released on Wednesday 7 November 2018. The appeal period closed on Wednesday 19 December 2018. The schedule of appeals can be viewed at https://2gp.dunedin.govt.nz/2gp/appeals- schedule.html.

You are advised to refer to our website to determine which rules in the 2GP have legal effect or are fully operative, and to determine which rules in the Operative District Plan are now inoperative.

The 2GP is subject to change at any time. Further rules will come into legal effect and/or become fully operative at the release of decisions and the resolution of appeals. You should check with the Council whether any changes have occurred since the date this LIM report was issued. The information provided with this LIM on district plan requirements is applicable as at the date this LIM is issued: there may be changes to the district plan rules following the release of this LIM that may affect this site and surrounding properties.

You should ensure that you consult the information and relevant planning maps in the Operative District Plan which can be found on our website at http://www.dunedin.govt.nz/your-council/district-plan and the 2GP which can be found on our website at http://www.2gp.dunedin.govt.nz as well as at all Dunedin City Council service centres and libraries.

OPERATIVE DISTRICT PLAN INFORMATION

Zoning This property is zoned as follows in the District Plan. Zone RESIDENTIAL 1

Noise This property is located in a Noise Area where the noise limits outlined below apply. Rule 21.5.1(i)(b) also specifies a maximum noise limit of 75 dBA Lmax between 9.00 pm on any night and 7.00 am the following day measured at the boundary of the site or within any other site. Note that some activities have a resource consent or existing use rights that allow these limits to be exceeded. Some activities are also exempted from noise limits. Furthermore, the actual limits that apply will also depend on whether this site adjoins a Noise Area Boundary and whether there are Special Audible Characteristics. Refer to Section 21.5 of the District Plan for further details. Every occupier of land is also under a general duty to adopt the best practicable option to ensure that the emission of noise from land does not exceed a reasonable level. Noise Zone 50Dt/35Nt dBA, 45SP dBA

Printed on 02-Oct-2020 Page 7

SECOND GENERATION PLAN INFORMATION

Zoning • General Residential 1 (refer Section 15, Residential)

Scheduled Items • Nil

Overlay Zones • Hazard 2 (flood) Overlay Zone

Mapped Areas • Nil

Resource Consents There are no resource consents for this property.

RESOURCE CONSENTS WITHIN 50 METRES OF 7 HARDEN STREET DUNEDIN 5014326 15 Dunedin-Waitati Road Dunedin SUB-2014-55 Subdivision Consent subdivision creating 2 lots. There has been no outcome yet. 5014369 3 Harden Street Dunedin RMA-1994-357023 Resource Management Act (Historical Data) Ownr:BRUCE CURRIE (Non- Notified - Non Complying). The outcome was Granted on 04/10/1994. RMA-1991-350999 Resource Management Act (Historical Data) Report Ownr:BUDDINGH (Non-Notified - Non Complying). The outcome was Granted on 14/06/1991. 5014370 5 Harden Street Dunedin RMA-2003-367212 Resource Management Act (Historical Data) ALTERATION TO EXISTING DWELLING (Non-Notified - Restricted Discretionary). The outcome was Granted on 12/11/2003. 5014373 11 Harden Street Dunedin LUC-2008-394 Land Use Consent erect carport in front yard. The outcome was Granted on 28/07/2008. 5014380 190 Malvern Street Dunedin RMA-1995-352275 Resource Management Act (Historical Data) DWG ADDN Ownr:MORRIS (Non-Notified - Non Complying). The outcome was Granted on 26/04/1988. 5014386 6 Harden Street Dunedin BACT-2019-66 Boundary Activity Notice deemed permitted boundary activity for the construction of a new vehicle bridge. The outcome was Issued on 26/11/2019. LUC-2018-429 Land Use Consent land use consent for the removal of vegetation, earthworks, demolition of the existing garage and the erection of two residential units, and the authorisation of breaches of the yard and height plane rule by the existing residential unit and accessory building. The outcome was Granted on 28/02/2019. RMA-1989-352475 Resource Management Act (Historical Data) ERECT BRICK ENTRANCE WALLS Ownr:DANIELS & (Non-Notified - Non Complying). The outcome was Granted on 27/02/1989. RMA-1990-350765 Resource Management Act (Historical Data) Subdivision Boundary Adjustment / App: A.D. Hosken PO Box 1083 (Non-Notified - Non Complying). 5106980 13 Harden Street Dunedin RMA-1993-356069 Resource Management Act (Historical Data) EST WASHING MACHINE RENTAL BUSINESS Ownr:WINTON AMIES / App: WINTON AMIES 69 MALVERN STREET (Non-Notified - Non Complying). The outcome was Granted on 16/06/1993. 5113878 12A Patmos Avenue Dunedin LUC-2014-528 Land Use Consent use of commercial premises in Residential zone. There has been no outcome yet. RMA-1993-356069 Resource Management Act (Historical Data) EST WASHING MACHINE RENTAL BUSINESS Ownr:WINTON AMIES / App: WINTON AMIES 69 MALVERN STREET (Non-Notified - Non Complying). The outcome was Granted on 16/06/1993.

Printed on 02-Oct-2020 Page 8

5123999 4 Harden Street Dunedin LUC-2016-414 Land Use Consent land use consent for bulk and location breaches of existing residential buildings and to re-authorise a jewellery business for Lot 2. The outcome was Granted on 08/09/2016. LUC-2016-369 Land Use Consent land use consent for a non-complying activity being the existing jewellery business on Lot 2 SUB-2016-66. The outcome was Granted on 08/09/2016. SUB-2016-66 Subdivision Consent boundary adjustment subdivision for 4 lots. The outcome was Granted on 08/09/2016. RMA-2001-364646 Resource Management Act (Historical Data) EXTEND EXISTING DWELLING (Non-Notified - Unrestricted Discretionary). The outcome was Granted on 21/03/2001. RMA-1995-357297 Resource Management Act (Historical Data) ER CARPORT ENCOMPASSING GRG & BNDRY FENC Ownr:T DANIELS / App: T DANIELS 4 HARDEN ST (Non-Notified - Non Complying). The outcome was Granted on 23/02/1995. RMA-1986-354417 Resource Management Act (Historical Data) ESTABLISH FINE METALS WORKSHOP IN BASEMENT Ownr:DANIELS / App: T F DANIELS 4 HARDEN STREET (Notified - Non Complying). The outcome was Granted on 09/07/1986. RMA-1989-352475 Resource Management Act (Historical Data) ERECT BRICK ENTRANCE WALLS Ownr:DANIELS & (Non-Notified - Non Complying). The outcome was Granted on 27/02/1989. RMA-1990-350765 Resource Management Act (Historical Data) Subdivision Boundary Adjustment / App: A.D. Hosken PO Box 1083 (Non-Notified - Non Complying). 5124001 2 Harden Street Dunedin LUC-2016-369 Land Use Consent land use consent for a non-complying activity being the existing jewellery business on Lot 2 SUB-2016-66. The outcome was Granted on 08/09/2016. SUB-2016-66 Subdivision Consent boundary adjustment subdivision for 4 lots. The outcome was Granted on 08/09/2016. RMA-1990-350765 Resource Management Act (Historical Data) Subdivision Boundary Adjustment / App: A.D. Hosken PO Box 1083 (Non-Notified - Non Complying).

If you would like a copy of any Resource Consent decision or advice on the current status and relevance of any planning matter referred to in the LIM, enquiries may be made at the Planning Enquiries desk on the Ground Floor of the Civic Centre, 50 The Octagon, or by phoning 477 4000 and asking for the Duty Planner. Planners are available at the Planning Enquiries desk to answer your enquiries between 8:30am and 5:00pm weekdays. .

TRANSPORTATION

No Transportation information was found for this property

As of the 24th April 2015, the Transportation Group no longer inspects the site as part of a LIM. Only the electronic records since 2002 have been examined for Transportation information in relation to the property.

For further explanations on property owner obligations in regard to local road encroachments, vehicle entrances, vegetation management or retaining structures please refer to the Dunedin City Council website at http://www.dunedin.govt.nz/services/roads- and-footpaths or contact Transportation on 477 4000.

For properties abutting the state highway, the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) is the Road Controlling Authority.

.

Printed on 02-Oct-2020 Page 9

WATER and WASTE

WATER

Urban water supply area – Connected This property is connected to the Dunedin City Council’s urban (on-demand) water supply. Indicative water pressures are available to view at www.dunedin.govt.nz/water-pressure, and flows available to the property can be provided on request. Any change in water use (e.g. for a new commercial activity) requires a new application to be made to the Council. It is recommended that the applicant check the property for the location and suitability of the water service.

Terms and conditions of supply All new and existing connections to the Dunedin City Council’s water supply network are subject to the terms and conditions of the Dunedin City Council Water Bylaw 2011. The bylaw is available to view at www.dunedin.govt.nz/water-bylaw.

Water pressure Indicative network water pressure to the property is shown on maps available at www.dunedin.govt.nz/water-pressure. Specific detail is available on request.

Water reticulation maps A copy of the water reticulation map of Dunedin City Council infrastructure in the vicinity of the subject property is attached. These show the location of the water main in the road. It may or may not show the water service to the property. It is recommended that the applicant check the property

WASTE

Stormwater/Sewer Separation - Compliant The Dunedin City Council requires the foul sewer and storm water being discharged from a property to be directed to the separate foul sewer and storm water networks, respectively. This property is in an area where inspections have been undertaken to ensure compliance with this requirement. This property was certified as complying with Council's requirements for storm water separation at the time of inspection on 10th July 2000.

No comment is made with regard to this property’s compliance with the requirement for storm water separation after the date of inspection.

Drainage Reticulation Plans A copy of the Dunedin City Council’s drainage infrastructure in the vicinity of the subject property is attached. Public foul sewers are show in red and stormwater sewers in green. All public drainage services are available to receive connections from the property and limited flows of stormwater may also be discharged to the street channel or an approved outfall.

Information Regarding Watercourses The controlling authority for all water and waterbodies in Dunedin City is the Otago Regional Council. The Regional Plan: Water addresses water take and use, diversions, damming, discharges and bed alteration under the Resource Management Act 1991. They are also responsible for the Flood Protection Management Bylaw 2012.

The controlling authority for watercourses in relation to stormwater drainage, and removal of obstructions in accordance with Local Government Act 1974 is the Dunedin City Council.

Printed on 02-Oct-2020 Page 10

The Council also issues building and resource consents for certain works around watercourses.

Not all watercourses within Dunedin City are recorded or known to the Council, therefore it is recommended that the applicant inspect the property for watercourses.

For further information on watercourses it is recommended the applicant read the Watercourse Information Sheet. A copy of this document is available on request or for download from the Dunedin City Council website www.dunedin.govt.nz

.

Printed on 02-Oct-2020 Page 11

APPENDIX

Glossary of terms and abbreviations The following are abbreviations and terms that may appear as a part of a LIM. Consent, Permit, Licence & Complaint types • AAB DCC Building permit • AAD DCC Drainage permit • AAG Green Island drainage permit • AAH Hyde permit • AAK St Kilda permit • AAM Mosgiel permit • AAP Port Chalmers permit • AAS Silverpeaks permit • AAT Maniototo permit • ABA Application Building Act 1991 • AMD Amendment to a Building Consent • BC Building Consent • BCC Building Compliance Certificate - Sale of Liquor Act • BCM Building Complaint • CER Certifier • COA Certificate of Acceptance • DGL Dangerous Goods Licensing • ENV Health complaint • HTH Health licence • LIQ Liquor licence • NTF Notice to Fix • NTR Notice to Rectify • PIM Project Information Memorandum • POL Planning Other Legislation • RMA Resource Management Act - Resource consent • RMC Resource consent complaint • WOF Building Warrant of Fitness Terms used in Permits & Consents • ALT Alteration • ADD Addition • BD D/C Board drain in common • BLD Building • BLDNG Building • BT Boundary trap • B/T Boiler tube • CCC Code Compliance Certificate • DAP Drainage from adjacent property • DGE Drainage • DIC Drain in common • DR Drainage • DWG Dwelling • FS Foul sewer • HEA Heater • ICC Interim Code Compliance • MH Manhole • PL Plumbing • PLB Plumbing • PTE Private • SIS Sewer in section • WC Water course • WT Water table • SW Stormwater General terms • RDMS Records and Document Management System .

Printed on 02-Oct-2020 Page 12 208

206

6A

204

12A

1

3

5 T

E

E

R

T

S 7

N R H E A R V D L E A N M S 9 T R E 196 E T 11

190

188 2

186

2018-2019 Urban, Copyright DCC/Aerial Surveys PARCEL LINES CAN VARY FROM Ltd. Rural, ORC/Aerial Surveys Ltd. CC BY 4.0 NZ Scale at A4: LEGAL PARCEL BOUNDARES This map is for illustration purposes only 2013 Urban and rural photography Jan/Feb 2013. 1:750 and is not accurate to surveying, engineering Copyright DCC. CC BY 3.0 NZ. or orthophotographic standards. Every effort Photographic Map 28/09/2020 has been made to ensure correctness and 2006/2007 Urban photography March 2007, 8:08:33 PM ¯ copyright NZAM. Rural photography March timeliness of the information presented. 2006, copyright Terralink International Ltd. 

 

























  























  

























 

























  

























 



  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

  



 

 

   

 

  





 

 







 

 





 

  

 

  

 

 



  



 

   



  





   

D 

  



D 

  



 

D  



 



D 

  



D 

  

 D 

   



D  



  



D 



  

D  



       D !   

D

  D Legend   D  208  Water Non-Return Valve D Water Supply    D Manifold Box     Water Pump Station D    D   Water Meter  Water Bore D    ! Toby D   2  Water Treatment Plant    2 D  Meter without manifold box   5  D !   Water Storage Tank  m 206  D   Retic Flow Meter   Supply Main m D    Combination Meter Trunk Main D  

 Disused 

D

 Manifold Box With Restrictor Reticulation

 R

D   Rider 6A  D Scour

  Water Valve - Zone

D 

Water Service Lateral

 

 D Non Return Valve Water Fire Service Lateral

  

D Water Critical Service Lateral

 

! 204   Water Zone Boundary

  Water Valve - Gate



 Water Reservoir



 D D Redundant Water Main

 Water Valve - Sluice

! 12A   



 

  Water Hydrant

 NOTE:   Private water services have the same symbols

 Water Backflow Preventor - RPZ

  as those above, however they are coloured pink.

 !

! 

  

m

 

 Foul Sewerage

  Pump Station

m 1 



 0

 ! Standard Manhole

5 Treatment Plant

   

1 !

  Valve Chamber (pressurised)

(! Vent



 

" Boundary Kit  

!  ! Foul Sewer Node

 m 3 Non-Return Valve   

Foul Drains in Common (public)

 m



 0  ! !

!   Pump Station Domestic Sewer

0   !

1  Trunk Sewer  Drop Manhole  ! 

 m ! 5 Vent Line

  Inspection Manhole

 H ! m  a   Rising Main

 5 r 

d  ! Inspection Opening

 2 Redundant Foul Sewer Pipe e 

n   

2 

S  ! Lamphole  t NOTE:

7  Private foul drains have the same symbols 

 Outlet as those above, however they are coloured orange.





 

 1 

 0

0 

 t

 m

 Stormwater

 S m Roading Bubble-Up Tank  



SW Bubble-up Tank

 9  n

!  r 

  Roading Mudtank

e SW Drop Manhole

 !  

v 1 

l

 5 

a 196 SW Insp Chamber and Grating Inlet Stormwater Main

0 

 

 

m 

M 

 

 11 Stormwater Trunk Main

m  ! SW Inspection Manhole

 

    

DCC Open Channel

 SW Inspection Opening   !  



 Piped WC

  SW Lamphole    !



 ! ! Open WC   

 

  SW Mudtank Inlet ! 

    Culvert

!  

190  

 SW Outlet

Stormwater Mudtank Pipe



 



 Redundant Stormwater Main

  SW Pipe Inlet  

 





³

 SW Sump

  SW Pressure Manhole 

 !





 m   SW Pump Station

 ! ! SW Standard Manhole  

m   188

 NOTE: 

 !

5 ! SW Stormwater Node

 Private stormwater drains have the same symbols as

2 

 2 those above, however they are coloured light green.

2  !

 ! 



  

   m 



 

 

  

 





  

 

m 



 



General Cadastral 

0  

 



m 



5 

Road/Rail  

DCC Water & Waste Structure Parcel     

1 



m  

Hydro 



Motorway Parcels 

 

0  





 Railway Centreline





  



 Strata

186 Easment (where  recorded)

0 

 



   









 



1 

 

 

 

 









 

Full legend can be viewed at https://www.dunedin.govt.nz/council-online/webmaps/waterservices  

    

  

  

  

 

        



 

  















  

2018-2019 Urban, Copyright DCC/Aerial Surveys 







Information shown is the best available at the time     PARCEL LINES CAN VARY FROM        Ltd. Rural, ORC/Aerial Surveys Ltd. CC BY 4.0 NZ 

Scale at A4: LEGAL PARCEL BOUNDARES   of publishing. The accuracy and completeness of

This map is for illustration purposes only 2013 Urban and rural photography Jan/Feb 2013.   This information is variable. Private assets are

and is not accurate to surveying, engineering Copyright DCC. CC BY 3.0 NZ.  1:750  typically not mapped. Recent changes may not be or orthophotographic standards. Every effort

  Council Water & Drainage Services reflected. Verify on site before commencing work. 28/09/2020 has been made to ensure correctness and 2006/2007 Urban photography March 2007,

 copyright NZAM. Rural photography March

 

 ¯ 8:08:41 PM timeliness of the information presented.  For all enquiries phone 03 477 4000. 2006, copyright Terralink International Ltd.



 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 





  

  

 

 

  

 

 







  

 



 

 



 







 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



 



























 



























 























 



























































 

















































  M a lve rn S t Rural Residential 2

D341

Fr ed H ollo ws Way

Patmos Ave

y a w r to o M n Large Lot Residential 1 r e th r o N in d e n H u a D rd e n S D450 General Residential 1 t

L

e

i t h E t

o g m n C119 o T C n a t n l S n t e r

R d

t nsing S D679 Te d R e id ks oc R D215

Stadium Noise Leaflet Drop mapped area

T1096 !

2018-2019 Urban, Copyright DCC/Aerial Surveys PARCEL LINES CAN VARY FROM Ltd. Rural, ORC/Aerial Surveys Ltd. CC BY 4.0 NZ Scale at A4: LEGAL PARCEL BOUNDARES This map is for illustration purposes only 2013 Urban and rural photography Jan/Feb 2013. 1:3,000 and is not accurate to surveying, engineering Copyright DCC. CC BY 3.0 NZ. or orthophotographic standards. Every effort Second Generation District Plan 28/09/2020 has been made to ensure correctness and 2006/2007 Urban photography March 2007, ¯ copyright NZAM. Rural photography March timeliness of the information presented. 8:09:03 PM 2006, copyright Terralink International Ltd. ^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^^^ ^^ ^^^ ^^ ^^^ ^^ ^^^ ^^ ^^^ ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Legend ^ ^ ^ ^ ! Significant Trees ^ ULCA24 ^ Zones ^ " Transpower Structure ^ ^ ^ Transpower Lines R1 - Residential 1 Zone ^ ^ ^ R2 - Residential 2 Zone ^ ñ Heritage Structure ^ R3 - Residential 3 Zone ^ ^ Heritage Facade ^ R4 - Residential 4 Zone ^ ^ DP Archaeological Sites ^ Ì R5 - Residential 5 Zone ^ ^ Airport Fan Designation 274 bdy ^ R6 - Residential 6 Zone ^ D341 R6 ^ R6A ^ Port Height Restrictions ^ R1 ^ Campus Zone ^ ^ DP Designations ^ Airport Zone

^ ULCA24 ^ ^ Urban Landscape Conservation Area Stadium Zone

^ ^ CA -Central Activity Zone ^ DP Taieri Aerodrome

^

^ LSR - Large Scale Retail Zone

^ Restricted Water Supply Area ^ LA1 - Local Activity Zone 1 ^

^ ! ! Ground Water Protection Zone A ^ LA2 - Local Activity Zone 2

^

^ Ground Water Protection Zone B

^ In1 - Industrial 1 Zone

^ ! ! ^ Public Roads not Legal In2 or SD - Industrial 2 or Special Development Zone ^ ^ PATMOS AVENUE ^ Unformed Legal Road Port 1 Zone ^ ^ Port 2 Zone ^

^

^ RR - Rural Residential Zone ^ Port & Airport Noise ^

^ Air Noise Boundary Rural Zone

^ XXXX ^ Y H - Harbourside ^ XXXX Airport Outer CAontrol Boundary ^ ^ Outer Port Control Boundary ^ XXXX W

^

^ Port NoisRe Boundary ^ XXXX ^ O

^

^ T ^ Esplanade Requirement ULCA24 ^ O ^ ^^^^ ^ MEsplanade Reserve Required ^ ^ ^^^^^^ Esplanade Strip Required

^ H N ^

^ A R ^ Landscape Management Boundary ^ R E

^ D ^ H outside boundary ^ E

^ T

^ N boundary between areas ^ R ^ S

^ O prominency boundary

^ T R6

^ R N ^

^ E E Townscape ^ E IN ^ Townscape and Heritage Precinct Boundary - Internal S ^ T D ! ! ^ ! !

^ Townscape and Heritage Precinct Boundary O E

^

^ L N

^

^ U C

^ Pedestrian Frontage

^ D

^ Identified Pedestrian Crossing N ^

^

^ Verandah Required

O

^

^

^ T

^ Areas of Significant Conservation Value boundary

^ ^

H ^ ASCV Boundary

^ ^

T ^ ASCV Boundary - Internal

I ^ ULCA24 ^

E ^ Areas of Significant Conservation Value (Esturine edge)

L ^ ÉÉ

^ ^

^ É Areas of Significant Conservation Value (Wetland)

^ ET

^ RE

^ G ST

^ NSIN

^ TE Most detail not shown at scales smaller than 1:25,000

^

^

^

^ Optimal scale range is 1:2000 - 1:5000 ^

^

^

^

^ This Planning Map is indicative. ^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^ The official Planning Maps are compiled within the District

^

^

^

^ Plan (Volume 2). This map is a representation of the official

^

^

^ maps. However, due to the ability to display these maps at

T

^ ^

^ E different scales, and the dynamic nature of the underlying ^

^

^ E

^ cadastre, some inconsistencies or misalignment of data may

^ ^ R

^ be depicted which is not visible on the official maps. Consult

^ T

^

^ Dunedin City Coucil for any clarification. ULCA24 S ^

^

^

^ N

^

^ R PARCEL LINES CAN VARY FROM

^ Scale at A4: LEGAL PARCEL BOUNDARES

^

^ E

^ This map is for illustration purposes only

^ V

^ and is not accurate to surveying, engineering

^ L 1:3,000

^ or orthophotographic standards. Every effort

^ A 28/09/2020 ^ Operative District Plan Map has been made to ensure correctness and

^

^ ¯

M 8:09:08 PM timeliness of the information presented.

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^ ^

^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ ^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^ ^^ ^^^ ^ ^^ ^^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^ ^^ ^^^ ^ ^^ ^^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^ ^^ ^^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^^ ^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^ ^^ ^^^^^^^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^^ ^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^ ^^^^ ^^^^ ^^^ ^^^ ^^^ ^^^ ^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ '~,~.':'~~+'i.~c;;5;:\i:~'T~~1m~J:j~;~~~ ~;~~:i'::::';~:;~':fz.~t~',

y--' f~t~: ...-;' ...... '. :-',

\., .' "-:'(

...... :.,.,

:~..':1.;...... "...

"':,! ". ":1

,

.\,. ~"..

....

...

.' .\

'..

, -,...

. ~. .-I'" fI..

'/ ,;..~

I..

------.:~.i.1~i~~:~ .f.~:/2.;:~;~is);g:f:~~~;Jrl';::::J~:J.,(,~:1~i~.":;:

~o-....

.. .jkSf)!,;'r~:;J!!t;~~ii~;f~!~i:;:~~1~~~~r~;~:.1'; .)

i~' .. " ..~ . ,..

~ ~'. . '-, ',';", ~ " ".", '\. . }c "."" ~l j' . \ ''''-'' -':t. -.~~: '- . ., \.. /. .~;~~., "" '-~ /. ~ t . ~ . .,~~F .. . ':-~ "< .: ':,.t

. , ~~ .. ~'.' ::-::-~: ::\, '.~_I Ii \ . -:--~". ... ;:' ., ....1 \ . It ',\ ...... , ". \ t''"':1::'"--'-,'''::''' " t:~_ : .\'..

\-.., " . ,"

' -:'-::. ,< " ....~ ...' ~. "\11! ..' . fII ".. :9 ;..~ .~:~.. .,s ...~ -"--:-:-~:.~ .'.:;~:'..i.' u'

. :'.~~r::~":' . . .L.;~ ..' j I. . f'O' "'" . ' .!' '>:~. ~:<;;,~~::''--' .

1'1/;-' . :.:>l~ f :~~~J::';~""':! .~,:[l . . '..' :~. : , .~; I . '0', .~~.r~ ~. ~' _,". i. ._. .- '2I '. ~-- ., '-.-: ~,;. ,:,!C. ,.:. -~ . t~'-J':~:/ .' 11'. .- ~ ,. .d~~; J.!... " . ~:. 'J. <'"t. --

~ .. .'')'~'';~~il-' \. F. :~".' . ~.---.: . , . ".:;- '.:~'i.;i.-.. , \ ~J."'1P ~. '~N.-':' .~..:t~~~ J -\ '.;' ,.",.~,...... ~,P. . " ~: ....\. . . ::..,~, ....;: -l ": ..

r .:;...... -'\ ./

.... . ~' '~':f~" .". " "-.;: " Tht ~., 4' "l~__ "~:~. -1i':' .~. ,;SAi"; :.;:~i~~ ...... / :- ,.~.~.. :', ..... -; J ~ ~ ...~~....~.~t; ...,.: "!.. ;~. ~~:'. .,;'., ':... .':." ,:':, :~r~~~~< ~}:~::.-. ~~~. .. ',l:~: .;.',~-... /'

U:1II11 III11I1111 IIUI1I11I1 1111111 1111I 111111111I11 II III 11I1 ! IIIIHIIIIIIIIHI'!!'! 111I11111 !ltlIlUItlHII II IHllI"II 11I11111 !I II "III"'"111111' 11111' III! IIIII"! 11111 !II"! IIIIIIIII!! I !III " .---...... -".----.-..-.-..-.-.....--..-.....-.-...... -.....-.---.--.~-.-..-...... -...... -.--.-...... ,.,...-." .1. .--' .1.

:..~ , :..~

.~'iI :~. : ~. .. 'j . , : ~ : :Ii .: . ..-. .;

::0. .. :~ :'S r ~/)N FllR )(1(. .({,K)-~ :~

, :! .

,

." K ll)tZ/Va:. ,c)T. II~~])IN 51. / G kJVU/T# ,.

" - , I 'RA'~ d Fl?OI'Ii :/:l (., i", u.() ~h '0 ~ ,Ie (..0"'.) tAJ.,t'~ '-PLAN 8oUNjt:JRf~

- II (~~PRIN~ ; H/A/.Q 1~1 HcuS r

- J - '6j;. ,\ I I .~ ./ -

.. { - j

-

-

..

-

I '. (3S

-

' ..

-, -' -' ~

-

-'

-'

......

- ...... -

-

.'

-

-

,;,.~. - J

-,

-. - J

- f 7S'

' - ~,~ ! ' - I

' t - I I 1 zo \ I ! ( 1

", ....

- - J, \ LJ /. /,,, i " -~. \<\ -:~ 'M.I2 - , _ ,t~ - - 1

' -

-' =: HARDEIV sr I -

'I -

-

- -

-. BOARD At'-lD SEWERAGE DUNEDIN DRAINAGE '- Plan ::;:C~l/;;f/;r;iq Connection foot House SCALE iin.to a DRAINS:RED NEW sEWERAGE BLACK SToRMWATER:DOTTED FULL BLACK OLD DRAINS:

;,''l./E i; U,.."/7)fi~~(( / l\ ., 1

\ \ 17 \ \

v

)\\ ;"': " -{ \ " :. \ ~ '~ ~ ~\ \ I \ \

~'

- -- _..,.\ ~ 't

l6'

" j/rtR!):9.f 571?bF7:.

ck-_~"",,,,,,~'"K-,,.~l'"';-'''''''o''' ,1fJ;;"' -- Stree~ Allo~~ent:j?~" 1&--1+>.4rc --' !!!_L5!!Hc.-----S!!f-;~', '-:;:; -- --:---- Locabty , ../.J .. __~--,cf'i- fD ramer _~-".l-~~ S.19nature 0 ,:>l._

!111111111I111IIJll!JJ!!J11111 ~MI!! IIIIIIIIIIII! 11111I mil II II II II 1111I ! IIII! 1I1I1I11II111I! II III "111I III ! IIIII II! I~! 111I) ~ \1111 Ul!lll III IJ!!!!J lip IIII,~ I ~, 11IM 11I111 !.!!1!1II11 11111111I 1111I11I !!!l!!!!!!!l!J~III=:=!III" I:!.t

- ~ .- - .~ ( l:~= '.:.i:t." i ("r'", W " ~; , ". .~:; I ,------._-_.-_._. --~------_." ',;,-- .

. ~...... ------~~. {~=

- - .,~ 7 ;~ - "- ..-

, - l .- '- !. r-I'-:= - . ., - - .'------tS'C"'7 .* .- .;.:: ~ '. i ~ ~ .'. " .:- ;~ ...._- _ ;,.,-': " ~.}. i,\'"' -,. ",~. ~ . .' . ,'. .;.' -~;' -l Ir . ~ .. , '~':-'j f -. _.- ". ; .;~~ ~.,,_. .~ = ! .' -', ", . - t . '...':' ~. ~ -:., ; 1 '. ~' II :- .--- ;/.~- ,', <) ." ',: . ..- ;":" .~ .:.~- ~ .\r.".- ~,-; .- .....-...... ~::. .. .~------:{... '.:" ..! - "- ::. . '../ ~' 1 ~ l {- ,- ../,:~ ,:,.~ =. ,'~, .: .- .. ',- ;-~ ~', .'; 1_ :..-: ;; ..- c.~_ - '~ =- .- ,- ' :=-.

. .;- '- ~ - :~~'~;v.'.~~';;~_-= .! -- . .. J ==- I - i - ":! --_. .------1 (. ~.__._-~"--~.~.-.,_.....,,-,,~._.,----!to,, - = '..; "', ~'.l . 1",: ..:/' ".' :-~.' -_. ~. /" .1= ""..... 1..- _,;..! LA _ _. 'I <' L - - ff...' -./'. ~ k =- ~\ ~_/T -=--- 1qf ..,-" - ~ r1-. _ ~' - - /-~"'U ~, - f IM'I ~,~ t .=... ~'. - I~/t" r".- ,~y' - ~....? d~ -- . ~~~' ',- .'t EaV/l1 ., .;.~f ~:- -f'rfr/f "1= '" - - . ~~U; - ._~.EjrJ'b f))f ~--_ - - -

-

-

- -

II! = - -

-

- -

. - ." f.) - .- I( '------,-#'.. - , - -- -_. 1'....-: - -- - ;., - I .tIfi~ - (I~' - T - .- - ~ - '.'- ",;V/ '..,.- ~',",'l;.j.=

~ - . "",,'. - 5Hfj) '.'. . . '.11';' ~5fT - i".....4 > I'"\~ - 'V 'c~ - J - - I' - -

- - I <7;/~~?;~~;;;~', .E- = ;.'r.- "";,. _'>',,:, /(, ;.-.,.: - .- '.-

.-

-

- " - '- .~ \I '- - - ~. - '.' - " .'." ---- - ~...,.;-,,;o.. ,. - ;7l .- .' LJ f ~ .- :.I" - 'F .> ,- "',/ \N'F.s7 ~"", V,47/ N

.- -

- - , -

.({, ., '-

-

-

- "'= . '1'," ~~~~l:l~~ {co)-iJ,' '/fy~o~ -

'- /~~1 z-~ o~~.~ .-

. - /'.~.-.-.. ,,/ ~~'10~~ :-.; - ./ k . ~-6 4fi~ ~ ~--_.'----. .: .,'. ~ c::..-o:~l~'/_ '- ^ ~ - '-dU (/:l., ~~ ai; 4;:X. ~.~/J.

-

-

~cu - ~y -

.' '.. , 25.... ,j~i::L~:~~ ~~. ".I.~.'- - ~= . / .- ~1 - C9'N..1 -Z ).ri-J; '- g '. .- ;i. ~H - 'f - - - - . I .(; .A'~"~~ _ *o.~ 7

.-

-

. '.' . .'.. .

. .

. - -

. . -

. . .'. ..' . ,'=--- . 1=

.

.

.

. .. ..~= ... . " ...... ' ." .... - 0. ',' '. ?:::? ...... 1=

.. . .'...... '...... - ...... Owner -

- , _ ..... ,..I , f'...... "Jd.. _ .,... 81 ,. 0 . k

_ oc ..w.. _ '}(-J . ,...... : _ #./1" ....'...6'...... ,...... ~....,...... ~...... ,...._...... ~...... ~..,...... ,.,...... J~..2. z;:;;;;r^ '_: ..''.. _ ,.....,...... :u> ...... /Q... .,...... ~,!...... "..,...,...... , ,.. (p' _...... 1i~...~ . .. . Street .... ^I L"J ...... - ...... ~ . .... Section...... ,..,..""...... 3~..c.." . L ...... :...... '...... (u...... ,...... ~~. ,f.iff .." . .... '. /""). ,,,,' . .':..... '. . ~ ...... , '/v.." ...... ,....~......

...... ' '.. .

...... Locality...... ;...... u...... u.u.;.. . - ...... - . :' _. - ...... ,. ....,...... ,o '"' ... -- -, ~ '. ".,,,,~,, """.'''. t.')'...... "~"..,.,, ,,'" ''','' ; '..Sign .tureof-~...."...... AU02~,~ """."1;"",.""".~0"""': . J ., . . ""....".""".'.."...."..""...... , ~/~1J R. \11 i

-

- - - - -

- - - -

~ .....~::.~-. - H ~- I~_" t"'~..,;4!<...,"' ~... -

~i..~.'4..../~"';.i' .. - -._--.<_..-...".,..;,..'-.<~,...~,..-"'_._~.., - .-_,'J "~";"f,:~'-.~' .,'_ - -*~"~-....',...,:~..:. .::.-.-_,.~. ~..~ -.1.., ==- I ~j= f = It- ~= -

; ~=- ,;::,,--- 5:- ~I,!I" ~:1

--"-'" -

-, - - - dj!-:,- =~ -, ^&l:~m~~nm!~~~Hll!1~~~.llIJlli!illUiml -' --' -:' ..\ =: ------' ~

JU ----~ =:' ~ -- ~ ~,,~,~ . '(l Ctl ;6,; ~~i \~', ~~ 'V ' 1,,1../' -" ~ ===t ~ S:' ::::~.t ",', I , ~~.' ,t, -' ::-:',~~ ~ -=X,';

--!;;" ..'-

...... -..... ,-- .,__:;:'~'~; __...... ,_.. -,...... t__,-__.. ," 'I ,'l'~">:;:'- ~ -=~:. ~- ._'-_\.."'.~,.~\...-~~-t':,-,' "/"

1 =' j ..------J-,.fy;,...... i/;'/" ...... , ~ - .

I' . ';r .H__A.._.H.,....~__.__.'._ _i~ - . ~.Ii" .... =1, .... -:

.; - ..'~ "~:I" ..~ ~ J"'" D /-- :/".;: jl \"" -, .--,,I ~ .-" ..r i ." =t ! ~ I I r----- ! l' I ~ I i, I ~ -;;/ 1

,__ =;~' ,vr , l "I;i ; :~ , j' )~' 1 J /-_ . .!I .J 1 ' f; ! ! ,i j I r ~~ ,,,,.."

.,..," 1~ ~: .:t.

. . ,,;"', , ': .r::;-,':':f-::~;:,',,~, ::/,-~f.,~:::.~.,l', <.'.- i ':'.- ;,,.i,'. ,"; ..,~':...;_ J i, ,.:::; ,._:..';:,',:"1.1__';-:;:: -,:"",~;,...;;".~c.-._. J =r Ji,' " ------'~IIIIIIII'IIII'"lIlIlIlIlInlmll,nl"UII""'"l11nlllllllnllllllllllll.mUlln,lnllllll.IIIUn'JI!!ll~m!HUIII,nlll.nn~lIIlIn,IJ.'~I.lIIn~~1111""l"!'~'~.!'I~~I,''''.'.~.~!!~.~ , ",-.---"'".~ - :,~ .. '*mM__~___"--')oO_-'''''''__'''--~-' - ....-...... '"""":__~_ - '~ - _. - ;~ -, . - '{ ~.~ - "." -j". ~i - :;\ - ... ." - - '~ - .,1 -' I, - -' -~ - ~.~ - - ill - - ,~ - - - .~ 1- ~- ,. - - l ..;::...... ".,.,. i" ~...:f - ( \..;,,...... ' .. t1~~ (".~...I,t;L~ - (,lJ.. -"'...., - t4f,w ~~,~\. i - - ...,. - ." - - " - - - ~V~ - . I - J - I It ..- - - - ~u~~ 5 - ~,~. r - I h'fW - . ~ r. =1 l - ',-2D' ,1 =i ~. ., -"; .. ~ '1 .~ l '~

-I j

-! ~ _I -i .x~ =1 "ijf ~I ~ ==1 I .'1 : f1.~

=, - - 'f =f - ~ - ,jl - - _. - I - - .~ - - I - \1 - - I ..~ - - tl - ~ - .. - ~ - ., - ! -. ...-: ,~ -' I .~:d" &.~?:-:-((,-:,;,) -' I .' S,'It.KL~ f -- .(Lltf. '~ - r-Y..( '5 / . - j;;:'(r:.(' . _~J!"'; _ - 711'I1"&1U ~ _. J?/ ,w ' I -~- I" /". -' '1,l-, (" .l ,. .. / -, '" ""-.... J ~."..I .t /" - '; ,,;.., .'-'- 1

. ..~; ! .- - . .... - 1 ..; .c...,,-,,~- - --.,...... ;./... ':7'-;..~. \IiI"') _. .' '",. "c I /'Ie- 'Y t ,i U ~.1-(;_---', .(""" 1..)c;..~1...... - "';:'" . (~. - ,(A:...J"-..? "f.....1 .)...~~/ , -, - i.' // ' - I i r' - ,/~"'/1 - ? , '..."" -... ~. ,.7 ='; , ....." -" - . I =.! -, - _:. I _. - ~; - - '" - i - ..\ - ~l --~"

=f r " ~~ ~ ,~." _...... ,::,...... -,....""...... _-....._.. .-~ -~ ..,...~...., .~ I

.~,' =--- ~ .,- ')1 =, ;'*, .~~ -' - ~" *71' ..J - - - ... - -, '\ I -" - '. 4~~. I - - '. - ~~ .~~ - - ,,~ - '\':1 -" I .~'.~ =r~. 'if =;;( I <- 7 .~~ t. .... =t* .~g =l',I,fi ~~, ~ . '. ,- - I b;. I =t::;. :-~ .7 ,., ; . ;~; fY~ t =,;' ;~ ~"~l';;? [:j _;-:i .'!of =~~ ..; I (.'(.' ~_..t I ~_.I:: :"i .. .~ =.:;:. -. ..'. I ,* ~ =;~ .

. .... ,- " ... .". f . =~ "...,....,- .... .'." .~. ..~...... ~~, 1;( ::, _.: i '.',;~. t 1 tt -". -)" I ;! =1" I -' I ;~ _. '{i'! -, ',)ii --~ I -, - ~,i/,p -,,,..n- ...... ' - I 1 =;f:- I ___ "b .~ _:;' -~ I =~ .~ - -ri ~~ - - -Jg.kfrJ.... t ..'~ - - I ~~ - - I - I = t ~~ - - ! z~ - "f! - - t - ~

- - ~ - - - .~~ - ,~~l - l;i1O~~~~k~l. - - ; - > ';- - "'i ..,I) t 1l

. ? . ,t' ;;31~'t;;r~i ,~.irr~ < { \'B. - {:J'0;;) ;;,>\ r. \t..J - ~~ t ~ - - ~ - i - ; - ';;,"'-, '''' ~~ ~~ - 1..,...14\..,...... f ,~...~;,t~~,~\ ~~.!(:.:it! , - '..~~~"'~!W;;;;,'M~_~~...~. '.-: - - - ~ - ...a _ .""." "" ,,,\'~~i,J> t::-,,!-~ ~~1. I - ~ -;.w-tJ.'I' ,tfi r - ~ ,.-'(~~.\-'t:;.,.;:...\I~~)"l~"'-.-..e..'...-.:.~L-.,.. ~..- - .....~:~4\.;I" -,"-" - .. - ~~Mi-r~f~;t.-:/~?"':':'''r''"X.",.f'1~/.:'':''}:....\.",:.:fott~')fq,~~,...... ~ - ~ - -, y .. - '- - ~ - - ~r:i _. - -' ., - - 4coy if - - -~ - - - '. ~, - - -= -r / 0.*'" _. 0,:' S~Crlj)/ SrEg ~r!!JIY . =! _. - -. -, - - - - l' - -" - - - -' - - -, - .~~ - - - - =, , ,)~ - - - ;lJff~' - ::2~~t~ =iI:.{ -=~

,- ,.,~;-.. . .c..,'..... - ...... ~...:'....::..t'~...<;"...r .~;..,:-_.!,j.i,:~.- - - ;.~~~"!tHI~...... _I.w::I""_~II'.("!II'W4a,'fll';.~ ~""~~Pta.....,-...~~~-~-..~.....--""---

._. ''':-

- '.-

- .'- ..---- .-----. ~

--- .:.~ '-

------j; ~1.J.illU I III III II Lilli ~ III 11111111 ~i III 1111111 --. .__11.. ""1"~.11'1T\VL. u;. ~L,;'" ~l"\1"'\UE: DV/"\r\.V _.~~...... '1., '-L !iitr j-- t!t, ~!& J>> ~_r H Z.o:2:iiSI:!C:s::uca::::w::a..!!i3IIl!!S!C;!l-.:::o.~..,",,;~ LI';I};l~.,J~t:;ljt~Ld+i/[k-'~[~lfFlt}1+

_.. I, "~ ~" :,~f("'~'! ~~:~t tlP'~~i~:~~ '~'t" ~.~ :~~; ef :J ._.

-"'~5"~/.r' ,~ "'.; .I " , . .~ .~",'.~" :'"1 " , O~~~ Sfi-;J[:::- ."/.., "*' ~~~...t ~v.t ~..1ll ,l..~~t 'f

.~ M5 " INT~'i) Or:".1 VV 0~tj<:S

,~~~ t;}i\n~ Q:\j ~~V v s)V1...fV f-l"'T0 \.,...;. -oJ'.I...f\P:;:~)tJ.; _ "'-... .t.;..... r -.~,

-:~" (.l,.--;> "> ' ...... ~ '-",'

"

::~~ . ~;;;;:u.~c.~~...... u..'~.~"""'1di' , ... ..~"I -~; ~-~ i;:r,,-fn~' 4"- . .r,:;;:;:. ~,~:',:" ~.~,'":' ,"..""".;

.~'

-.'~~ ;., I

,~ ':r

- ;., l~_.~

,e"oCYS; / (C:"XG/lx 59 me-sh.

,

I 1__ -~

3/8" . , ~QraYs . 14"~3" ~ ~.. .. "'. . ," '\.. . I .

". , <-. Vel'~ C\t JS"as hcn-dr,1J ~ 1'3'" J/a"

~

:, ,L

~

P~_:~.,;- :;'~ ~ ~ :.~< ~:."

~ '.1. .!.t", .. ~...... ~._~"", .-~ l,..l.r~t!,:;:l"r ..0 i.;10 +i..:",,\ n:_..r~-~.-.J. (::_!....~~"':\ JJ.._..:---: ~.r, ,.:1"~:1S Lt. !.:'- ....1-:::-4: !~.: r1J ...... _.l.<-..!~ ~..r t. r.. _1...... , -;.._..j .-.--_..;-..::'1'.:r"....,... ; --~ .__.....,..:...~__~! !:._"~ ;~): S ;...~, \.... ~ ...: i.... ~ ._-C.. .~J: ."~~-O\I;:'\..J t ~:} Q! _ <00;-' .... r f- !-~, -:. ,.. _.WJ...... ;... ~: ..J, i''f .... :+ : .. J . 1-" .~ PO Box 768 DUNEDIN Phone: (03) 476 1800 Fax: (021) 789 802 Mobile: 021 633 957 email: [email protected]

Ref:NP951.RP2

REPORT ON

ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY RANKING

OF LANDFILLS IN THE OTAGO REGION

Report 2 – Medium and Low Priority Landfills Vol. 1.

Presented to: Otago Regional Council Private Bag DUNEDIN

March 2000

Prepared by:

SEM New Zealand Limited

Written/Submitted by: Written/Approved by:

Jackie Fanning Brendon Love Researcher Project Manager

Solutions in Environmental Management Page i i Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...... 1

2. INTRODUCTION ...... 4 2.1. BACKGROUND ...... 4 2.2. BASIS OF METHODOLOGY ...... 4 2.3. CLASSIFICATIONS ...... 4 2.4. SCOPE OF WORK ...... 5

3. RANKING PARAMETERS ...... 7 3.1 PHYSICAL PARAMETERS ...... 8 3.1.1 Groundwater Presence ...... 8 3.1.2 Groundwater Depth ...... 8 3.1.3 Groundwater Use ...... 8 3.1.4 Type of Groundwater Use ...... 8 3.1.5 Surface Water ...... 9 3.1.5 Surface Water Distance ...... 9 3.1.6 Surface Water Quality ...... 9 3.1.7 Surface Water Use ...... 10 3.1.8 Type of Surface Water Use ...... 10 3.1.9 Local Topography (i.e. immediate 100 metres of site) ...... 10 3.1.10 Geology ...... 10 3.1.11 Down-gradient Use ...... 11 3.2 OPERATIONAL PARAMETERS ...... 11 3.2.1 Facility Age ...... 11 3.2.2 Receiving Waste Streams ...... 11 3.2.3 Leachate Controls ...... 11 3.3 TOTAL IMMEDIATE RISK COLUMNS IN ESR RANKING ...... 12 3.3.1 Risk to Ground Water Users ...... 12 3.3.2 Risk to Surface Water Users...... 12 3.3.3 Leachate Run-off Risk ...... 12 3.4 DESKTOP RESEARCH ...... 12

4. RESULTS ...... 14 4.1 SUMMARY OF SITES ...... 14

Solutions in Environmental Management Page ii Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region 5. MEDIUM PRIORITY LANDFILL SITES ...... 16

6. LOW PRIORITY LANDFILL SITES ...... 17

7. CONCLUSIONS ...... 18

8. RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 19

APPENDICES – (see Volume 2) APPENDIX A ...... ESR Score Sheets, Well & Consents Tables for Medium Priority Sites APPENDIX B ...... ESR Score Sheets, Well & Consent Tables for Low Priority Sites APPENDIX C ...... Landfills Near Water Identified for Future Water Enhancement APPENDIX D ...... Landfills with Hazardous or Unknown Type of Waste APPENDIX E ...... Results of a Hazardous Waste Pilot Study for Otago 1983 APPENDIX F ...... Landfill Name with SEMNZ & ORC Site ID APPENDIX G ...... Miscellaneous Landfills

Solutions in Environmental Management Page 1 Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SEMNZ New Zealand was retained by the Otago Regional Council to undertake an Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of all landfill sites within the Otago Region boundary. Following a detailed historical investigation, 160 landfill sites have been identified and classified. The objective of the project, as agreed with the Otago Regional Council, was to prioritize these sites based on the risk associated with the potential discharge of landfill leachate and the sensitivity of the receiving surrounding environment. The Environmental Sensitivity Ranking (ESR) was used to classify sites as low, medium, or high environmental risk based on the numerical value of 14 parameters at each site (see Section 3. for details). Numerical ranking using physical and operational parameters is useful for initially categorising a large number of sites. A review of site specific information was necessary; however, to determine if any sites classified as low or medium risk may pose an immediate risk to resource users. As a result, landfills classified as low or medium with the potential to have an immediate risk are grouped with the high risk sites as having High Priority. Parameters that indicate a potential for an immediate risk include: type of waste; total risk to groundwater users; total risk to surface water users; and leachate runoff risk. The sites identified as high priority are highlighted blue in Figure 1. Information on the landfills classified as high priority is reported in “Report on ESR of Landfills in the Otago Region, Report 1 – High Priority Landfills”. Recommendations for further investigation and sampling have been developed for these high priority sites. This report details information on the landfills classified as low priority or medium priority. Landfills classified as LOW PRIORITY and MEDIUM PRIORITY have an ESR score of Low Risk or Medium Risk, and do not pose an immediate risk to the users of the surrounding environment. Briefly, the scope of work undertaken to achieve the project objective comprised:

• Site Ranking Design: Selection of ranking parameters, weighting of ranking parameters and design of ranking score sheets.

• Desktop Research Investigation: Review of existing site information concerning a number of pertinent parameters in order to rank the sites according to environmental risk.

• Local Knowledge Collation: Survey of local people and site visits to gather information that was not available through the Desktop Research.

• Data Collation & Interpretation: Collation of all data and evaluation of scores for each of the parameters.

• Data Presentation: Preparation of reports for the sites including comments regarding the suitability of current monitoring and, where necessary, recommendations for further investigation or sampling.

Solutions in Environmental Management Page 2 Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region The results of this study indicate that: • The following landfills are classified as Low Priority: Uxbidge, Ocean Grove (Mr Hasties – Smails Beach), Albany Street, Westwood/Ocean View, Lake Dunstan Shoreline (possibly Old Cromwell Dump), Ocean Grove County, George Scurr, Harrington Point Road, Waitati, Millers Flat, Oturehua, Hampden, Allanton, Chislom Park, Gilligan Street, Logan Park, Port Chalmers – Blueskin Road, Ravensbourne, Omakau Abattoirs, Ranfurly, Blue Mt Lumber (current), Seacliff Hospital, McCallum Road, Orokonui Holiday and Recreation Park, Kakanui, Benevolent, Green Island, Jubilee, Outram, Sunnyvale, Becks, Lowestoft, Andersons Bay, Aramoana, Brough Street, Edwards Bay, Karitane, Prospect Park, Scroggs Hill, Taieri Beach Road, Waikouaiti (Inverary Street), Wharf Street, Woodhaugh, Ophir, Clydevale, Edievale, Tahakopa, Maclennan, Gabriels Gully (newer), Gabriels Gully (older), Ngapara, Enfield, Oamaru, Victoria Flats, Maori Hill (Henry Street), Oval, Port Chalmers (Station Road), Waitati (old), Beamount, Kaitangata, Mt Cooee, Tapanui, Waitahuna, Epsilon Street, Lauder, Tarras, Kaka Point, Waihola, Waipahi, Naseby, Waipori Falls (newer), Waipori Falls (older), Herbert, Frasers Road, Midland Street, Taieri Road/Nairn Street, Lawrence, Owaka, Taieri Mouth, Tuapeka Mouth, Windsor, Waiwera South, Boundary Road, Inner Harbour Reclaimation, Montecillo, Opoho, Blue Mountain Lumber (older), Moeraki, Dean Street, Unity Park, Benhar, Hyde, Bernard Street, Ellis Park, Glenpark Avenue, Robin Hood Quarry, Springhill Road, and Sunflower. • The following landfills are classified as Medium Priority: Ocean Beach Domain, Morshius Subdivision, Papanui Inlet, Seacliff Hospital ‘Hay Sheds’, Long Beach, Humber Street Gas Works, Hawea, Palmerston, Glenorchy, Berwick (Maungatua Road), Goodwood, Warrington, Maia, Olbell Bridge, Makarora, Tucker Beach, Berwick (site 1), Garthmyl Road (Middlemarch), Taieri River (Middlemarch), Clinton, Coronation Park, Heriot, Clyde, Waipiata, Kingston, Berwick/Waipori River, Mt Cargill Water Trough, Waikouaiti (Edinburgh St), Odlins Timber Treatment Disposal Area, Glenomaru, Milton Sewage Treatment Plant, Albert Town, Cherry Farm, Bannockburn, and Dunback. • The following landfill sites are categorised as High Priority: Craigpine Timber Treatment Site, Patearoa, Fern Hill Tip, Roxburgh (newer), Barrowbox, Roxburgh (old), Alliance Textiles, Luggate, Ettrick Landfill, Pukeuri Works, Cromwell, St Bathans, Factory Road, Finegand Freezing Works, Wedderburn, Macraes Road, Dunstan Road - ORC Depot, Alexandra, Dukes Rd - Commercial, Wanaka, Wingatui, North Taieri, North Taieri Recycle Centre, Fairfield, Milton, Telford Farming Institute, and Sawyers Bay.

• SEMNZ recommend that the location of all landfills are entered into the Land Information New Zealand Database to ensure that future resources users are not adversely effected by any landfill discharges.

• SEMNZ recommend that the High Priority sites are investigated as per the individual recommendations listed in the site summary statements for each site in Report 1 – High Priority Landfills, Section 5.

• The numerical score sheet (Figure 1) presents the total risk values for each of the sites.

Solutions in Environmental Management Page 3 Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region It should be noted that: the quality of information for some sites in regard to historical information and/or site location cannot be assured by SEMNZ as such information is based on anecdotal evidence from surveying local people.

Based on historical records, many of the landfill sites in this report are scored as having received only domestic waste. Most of these sites were, however, uncontrolled ‘community tips’ and therefore the exact nature of the types of waste disposed is unknown. Landfills that are scored as containing ‘hazardous or unknown’ types of waste are ‘community tips’ in industrial areas or landfills where information shows the disposal of potentially hazardous waste. These landfills with ‘hazardous or unknown’ waste are highlighted with a red '4' in the ‘type of waste’ column in Figure 1 and are listed in Appendix D.

In 1983, the Ministry of Health - Dunedin, conducted a Hazardous Wastes Pilot Survey. The details of this survey are presented in Appendix E. In summary, many of the companies listed in this survey disposed of their waste at the Green Island Landfill, Maxwells Landfill (now Fairfield Landfill – Blanc Estate), and the North Taieri Landfill. Other companies stated that private contractors disposed of their waste. SEMNZ established that most of the ‘private contractors’ disposed of this waste at the Fairfield Landfill (previously Maxwells). One company refused to provide SEMNZ with any information. In some cases, the companies listed in this survey no longer exist.

Solutions in Environmental Management Page 4 Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region

2. INTRODUCTION

2.1. BACKGROUND As part of their Land Sustainability Program, the Otago Regional Council (ORC) is investigating contaminated sites with the objective of reducing risks to humans and the environment. In order to meet performance targets (as set out in the ORC Annual Plan 1999/2000), the Council is required to complete preliminary investigations and implement appropriate management strategies at high priority landfill sites within Otago. The ORC identified 120 unclassified landfill sites within the Otago region requiring classification into low, medium, or high risk. In order to determine the level of risk presented by each site, and to develop appropriate management strategies at high priority landfills, the ORC has requested SEMNZ to prepare this report of Environmental Sensitivity Rankings (ESR) for these sites. In addition, the ORC requested that SEMNZ include in this research any landfills additional to the 120 already listed.

2.2. BASIS OF METHODOLOGY SEMNZ’s work scope was largely based on the Draft National Rapid Hazard Assessment System For Potentially Contaminated Sites (NAS) developed by the Ministry for the Environment (1993). While the NAS looks closer to risk relationships associated with known contaminant concentrations on sites, SEMNZ’s ranking approach considered potential levels of risk associated with a site’s surrounding environment and physical characteristics. The NAS and other ESR systems are generally designed to screen large numbers of contaminated sites with respect to the need for further action. The usefulness of any sensitivity ranking lies in the ability to logically identify sites that represent the greatest risk to humans, the environment and exposure to liability. The following section of this report outlines the work program used by SEMNZ to achieve the project objective.

2.3. CLASSIFICATIONS This investigation has two classifications: risk and priority. High Risk sites are landfills that have a total score of 45 or greater in the Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of 14 site parameters (see Section 3. for details). Medium Risk sites are landfills that have a total score of between 30 and 44 in the Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of 14 site parameters. Low Risk sites are landfills that have a total score of 29 or less in the Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of 14 site parameters. High Priority sites are landfills that require further investigation and/or the implementation of appropriate management strategies. High Priority sites have been selected based on the following criteria: 1. Sites having a High Risk ranking in the ESR;

Solutions in Environmental Management Page 5 Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region 2. Sites thought to contain hazardous or unknown waste and which pose an immediate risk to water users; 3. Sites which pose an immediate risk to surface water and/or ground water users, or 4. Sites where current monitoring is inadequate. All high risk sites are high priority. Some low or medium risk sites may be classified as high priority if there is potential for an immediate risk to the users of the environment. Landfills ranked as Medium Risk and Low Risk in the ESR are classified as Medium Priority and Low Priority, respectively, as they do not pose an immediate risk to the users of the surrounding environment.

2.4. SCOPE OF WORK An ESR is a comprehensive system for the hazard assessment of a site, and is inclusive of the following parameters that contribute to the overall risk of a site: site location, topography and hydrogeology, site containment, migration pathways and potential receptors. In this study, SEMNZ has performed an ESR based on 14 operational and physical parameters with the objective of identifying high risk sites which require further monitoring, sampling or site management. Broadly, the work scope comprised:

• Site Ranking Design: Selection of ranking parameters, weighting of ranking parameters, and design of ranking score sheets.

• Desktop Research Investigation: Review of existing site information concerning the following parameters:

1. Distance from site location to groundwater resources;

2. Depth to groundwater;

3. Distance to groundwater usage;

4. Type of groundwater usage;

5. Distance from site location to surface water resources;

6. Water quality and biology or future enhancement of these surface water resources;

7. Distance to surface water usage;

8. Type of surface water usage;

9. Topography;

10. Local geology with respect to permeability;

Solutions in Environmental Management Page 6 Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region 11. Land use down-gradient of the site;

12. Age of landfill;

13. Type of waste disposed; and,

14. Containment measures on site.

• Data Collation & Interpretation: Collation of all data and evaluation of scores for each of the parameters.

• Data Presentation: preparation of Report 1 - High Priority Landfills, including recommendations for further investigations or sampling programs.

• Data Presentation: preparation of this Report 2, providing details on landfills classified as medium or low priority. The appendices for Report 2 are contained in a separate volume (Volume 2 – Appendices).

Solutions in Environmental Management Page 7 Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region

3. RANKING PARAMETERS The following section outlines SEMNZ’s approach to the development of the sensitivity ranking parameters. There are numerous parameters that signify potential environmental risk; geology, hydrogeology, topography, setting, presence of surface water bodies, to name a few. These parameters, for the purposes of this report, have been broadly split into "physical" and "operational". Physical parameters are those attributed to the natural environment (topography, geology, hydrogeology, presence of surface water bodies, etc.). Operational parameters are those attributable to man made features (groundwater usage, development setting, site hydrology, etc.). A suitable ranking system to achieve the objectives of the client’s immediate needs must consider both pertinent physical and operational parameters while at the same time maintaining reasonable time and cost constraints. Therefore to meet the client’s immediate needs the first pass of the ranking system has been based on "global" information; i.e. information predominantly obtained from readily available records. Such records would include published geological maps, topographic maps, groundwater usage maps, in-house knowledge, facility age and containment practices, etc. To produce an effective and timely ranking system the number of parameters needs to be minimised, but at the same time critical parameters must not be omitted. The inclusion or elimination of parameters should be based on the criterion that each parameter on its own must represent a degree of risk worthy of consideration. The logic of this selection process is that the final ranking system is not intended to represent finely tuned risks, but a categorisation of sites based on the relative risk posed by one site when compared to others. In addition, the ranking may identify areas of concern that may require further investigation. Section 3.1 and 3.2 detail what we believe are important readily available parameters (in order of decreasing importance) and why they are seen as such. Numerical risk values are also included for each parameter listed. It should be noted that for some sites, the risk scores were based on anecdotal evidence of operations, and as such, the quality of the data cannot be assured.

The ‘Map Info’ computer program at the Otago Regional Council was used to determine the following parameters;

• closest surface water body to the landfill;

• type of surface water use down-gradient of the landfill;

• type of ground water use; and

• distance of the user extraction point from the landfill site.

The landfills' locations, consents and wells were entered into the ‘Map Info’ program using northings and eastings coordinates. The maps that were generated from this information, follow the site location details on each site in Sections 5 & 6. It should be noted that while the distance between the landfills and surface water users and ground water users is exact, the distance between landfills and surface water bodies should be interpreted with some caution, due to a slight distortion of the topographic map. In addition, some smaller surface water bodies are not shown on the ‘Map

Solutions in Environmental Management Page 8 Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region Info’ topographic map. Unless SEMNZ has visited a site or has information to state otherwise, the surface water bodies shown in ‘Map Info’ are used to score the closest surface water from the landfill site location.

3.1 PHYSICAL PARAMETERS

3.1.1 Groundwater Presence Possibly the most important parameter when assessing long term liabilities. Groundwater is viewed by regulatory agencies as a potential resource if it is of a certain quality, irrespective of whether it is currently being used or not. Therefore this parameter represents both immediate and potential future liabilities. The potential to impact a groundwater resource is directly proportional to the depth of the groundwater and the distance to recoverable groundwater from the landfill site location. Groundwater resource known > 500 m of site: Low Risk = 0 Groundwater resource known to exist within 500 m of the site: Medium Risk = 2 Groundwater resource known beneath site: High Risk = 4

3.1.2 Groundwater Depth Groundwater depth and the presence of confining layers are considered to assess the potential of the landfill leachate migrating and contaminating the groundwater. Deep (>20 m) or confined groundwater beneath site: Low Risk = 0 Groundwater unconfined (10 – 20 m): Medium Risk = 2 Shallow (< 10 m) unconfined groundwater: High Risk = 4

3.1.3 Groundwater Use Current groundwater usage is an important parameter as any landfill leachate has the potential to impact groundwater and subsequently the end user of the groundwater, be it stock, plants through irrigation, or humans directly. This parameter relates more to immediate liabilities. This parameter is subtracted from the ‘Total’ column in Figure 1 as it is used to calculate ‘Risk to Ground Water Users’ (see 3.3.1 Risk to Ground Water Users). No groundwater use: Low Risk = 0 Groundwater use 1000 m – 250 m from the site: Medium Risk =4 Groundwater use < 250 m from the site: High Risk = 8

3.1.4 Type of Groundwater Use For this project, this parameter has been weighted in general terms only. Any future investigation should consider the risk value with regard to the contaminant. For instance, some chemicals have a high uptake from plants while others may bond strongly to sediments and not readily enter the food chain. With the exception of wells for domestic use, owners of wells require a consent to take water before they are permitted to use the well. Wells that did not have a consent to operate were, however, included in this parameter as the status of the well may change with time. Disused wells were not included. This

Solutions in Environmental Management Page 9 Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region parameter is subtracted from the ‘Total’ column in Figure 1 as it is used to calculate ‘Risk to Ground Water Users’ (see 3.3.1 Risk to Ground water Users). Irrigation Purposes: Low Risk = 0 Stock Watering Purposes: Medium Risk = 4 Potable Drinking Supply: High Risk = 8 It should be noted that samples should be taken and individual leachate contaminant concentrations should be analysed where groundwater is used down-gradient of landfill locations (Report 1- High Priority sites – Summary Statements and recommendations, Section 5.).

3.1.5 Surface Water Surface water bodies are potential receptors of contamination. Surface water bodies (rivers, streams, lakes etc.) and associated food chains are protected under various regulatory legislation. Surface water bodies are prone to impact by both contaminated groundwater discharge and contaminated surface run-off. Surface Water is ranked using the following parameter values:

3.1.5 Surface Water Distance This parameter is subtracted from the ‘Total’ column in Figure 1 as it is used to calculate ‘Leachate Runoff Risk’ (see 3.3.3 Leachate Runoff Risk). Surface Water > 500 m from site: Low Risk = 0 Surface Water 100m - 500 m from site: Medium Risk = 4 Surface Water < 100 m from site: High Risk = 8

3.1.6 Surface Water Quality Surface water quality has been assigned the following risk values based on a review of the water values listed in the Proposed ORC Water Plan, Water Quality Sites (ORC Water Quality database), or previous surface water monitoring. This parameter includes a review of surface water bodies that meet one or more of the criteria for enhancement in Policy 6.5.5 of the Proposed Regional Policy Statement for Otago. Poor Surface Water Quality: Low Risk = 0 Good Surface Water Quality or Future Enhancement: Medium Risk = 2 Significant Value: High Risk = 4

Solutions in Environmental Management Page 10 Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region 3.1.7 Surface Water Use Surface water use also requires consideration and has been assigned the following risk values based on the location of registered water takes in the ORC Database. Where information on a particular Surface Water parameter is unavailable the score is rated zero. This parameter is subtracted from the ‘Total’ column in Figure 1 as it is used to calculate ‘Risk to Surface Water Users’ (see 3.3.2 - Risk to Surface Water Users). Surface water users > 1000 m down-gradient: Low Risk = 0 Surface water users 1000 m – 250 m down-gradient: Medium Risk = 2 Surface water users < 250 m down-gradient: High Risk = 4

3.1.8 Type of Surface Water Use For this project this parameter has been weighted in general terms only. This parameter is subtracted from the ‘Total’ column in Figure 1 as it is used to calculate ‘Risk to Surface Water Users’ (see 3.3.2 Risk to Surface Water Users). Irrigation Purposes: Low Risk = 0 Stock Watering Purposes: Medium Risk = 4 Potable Drinking Supply: High Risk = 8

3.1.9 Local Topography (i.e. immediate 100 metres of site) Due to the fact that surface runoff is the main contaminant transport mechanism on unsealed sites, site topography will affect the rate at which surface water bodies near the site become contaminated. For this reason the site topography is multiplied by the “distance to surface water parameter” (see 3.3.3 Leachate Runoff Risk). The local topography parameter is subtracted from the ‘Total’ column in Figure 1 as it is used to calculate ‘Leachate Runoff Risk’. Site is flat with no surface drainage Low risk = 0. Site has slight slope and drainage towards surface water body Medium risk = 1 Site slopes and drains steeply towards surface water body High risk = 2

3.1.10 Geology The geology of a site or region influences the risk associated with waste product & leachate losses. The obvious impact is the rate and degree of potential migration of leachate via high permeability sediments into the groundwater. Claybound layer/impermeable: Low Risk = 0 Silty Clays/Semi permeable: Medium Risk = 2 Sands and Gravels/highly permeable High Risk = 4

Solutions in Environmental Management Page 11 Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region 3.1.11 Down-gradient Use The use of land down-gradient of a facility has immediate risk implications. Different uses have different sensitivities. For example, open grazing land would represent a lower risk or immediate liability than residential properties. Industrial Land Use Low Risk = 0 Agricultural Land Use Medium Risk = 2 Residential Land Use High Risk = 4

3.2 OPERATIONAL PARAMETERS

3.2.1 Facility Age The age of a facility is expected to be generally directly proportional to the biochemical phase that the landfill is in. Studies have shown that beyond 20 years most landfills become biologically inert and leachate production reduces (Rushbrook, 1990, Pohland et al., 1985). The five biochemical stages of a landfills lifetime. Facility Age > 50 years: Low Risk = 0 Facility age 20 – 50 years: Medium Risk = 2 Facility age < 20 years: High Risk = 4

3.2.2 Receiving Waste Streams The types of waste disposed of at a site will effect the ranking procedure. Most sites in this study are ‘community tips’ and have had uncontrolled domestic waste disposal and will therefore have the same score. Some sites, however, may have been known to accept hazardous wastes that would increase the risk to the surrounding environment. Community landfills in industrial areas or where the type of waste disposed was unknown were scored with a value of 4. Domestic Waste: Low Risk = 0 Hazardous or Unknown: High Risk = 4

3.2.3 Leachate Controls Leachate generation mechanisms are directly associated with the infiltration of rain and surface water to a landfill, contact of buried wastes with groundwater, and composition of the waste deposited. As such, the presence of an impermeable liner, capping and/or any bunding and containment measures will influence the overall environmental risk. For the purposes of the ESR, landfills that have been capped with substrate other than clay are considered to have inadequate controls in place as infiltration of rain and surface water may still occur. Capping and surface water diversion: Low Risk = 0 Controls inadequate: Medium Risk = 2 No capping and leachate controls: High Risk = 4

Solutions in Environmental Management Page 12 Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region 3.3 TOTAL IMMEDIATE RISK COLUMNS IN ESR RANKING To give greater weight to immediate rather than long-term risks, the following parameters were developed which highlight potential immediate risks.

3.3.1 Risk to Ground Water Users The distance to the ground water use and the current type of ground water usage determines the risk of contamination to ground water users. Total risk to ground water users is therefore the sum of the values for distance to groundwater use and the type of ground water use.

3.3.2 Risk to Surface Water Users The risk of contamination to surface water users is determined by the distance to the surface water use and the current type of surface water usage. The risk to surface water users is therefore the sum of the values for distance to surface water use, and the type of surface water use.

3.3.3 Leachate Run-off Risk Due to the fact that surface runoff is the main contaminant transport mechanism on unsealed sites, the topography parameter will effect the rate at which surface water bodies near the site become contaminated. For this reason site topography is linked to distance to surface water parameter. The distance to surface water parameter is multiplied by the site topography to give a value of risk to surface water, that is, ‘Leachate Run-off Risk. Sealed sites (value 0 in 3.2.3 Leachate Controls) with a low potential for contaminated surface water run-off was scored zero. Example: Surface water < 100 m. (8) multiplied by site slightly slopes and drains towards surface water body (1). ‘Leachate Run-off Risk’ value = 8.

3.4 DESKTOP RESEARCH The following information sources were used in the collection of site location details: Terraview, ORC Land Database, survey of local people and Local Authorities, DCC Archives, and Site Visits. Site Location Details: • Address; • District; • Map Grid References; • Valuation New Zealand Number; • Lot Number; • Surrounding Land Use; • Certificate of Title;

Solutions in Environmental Management Page 13 Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region • Current Zoning and Current Site Use. The sources of information that were used to define the level of risk associated with each parameter included: Historical Details and Chemical Hazards: • Previous study reports and landfill reference material. Physical Characteristics of site: • Facility Age and Topography (Surveying Local Authorities and Local people); • Geology (NZ Geological maps); • Well location (Hydrogeological/Well Database - Map Info, ORC); • Water Consent information (R2D2, ORC); • Surface Water Takes (Map Info, ORC); • Ground water and Surface water (Map Info, ORC and Site Visits); • Surface Water Quality (Proposed Regional Plan: Water, and Water Quality Database – ORC), Existing reports, and Site Visits.

Solutions in Environmental Management Page 14 Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region

4. RESULTS The environmental risks associated with each of the sites can be looked at using the following simple relationship: EXPOSURE x HAZARD = RISK For the purpose of this report, SEMNZ has concentrated the parameter risk rating on exposure pathways, assuming that the hazards at each site are similar due to the fact that most landfills have had wastes of similar toxicity deposited (e.g. Domestic). Thus, if no exposure path exists for the migration of leachate from the site then there is no off-site perceived risk. Using this scenario, the sub-surface geology, hydrogeology and groundwater and surface water use of each site become the critically weighted factors in the risk exposure rating. The ultimate uses of any groundwater and surface water are also major factors in any perceived risk from leachate losses. If the sub-surface geology is permeable and groundwater is used for drinking there may be a significant risk if leachate leakage to the groundwater system occurs.

4.1 SUMMARY OF SITES The results of this study indicate that: • The following landfills are classified as Low Priority: Uxbidge, Ocean Grove (Mr Hasties – Smails Beach), Albany Street, Westwood/Ocean View, Lake Dunstan Shoreline (possibly Old Cromwell Dump), Ocean Grove County, George Scurr, Harrington Point Road, Waitati, Millers Flat, Oturehua, Hampden, Allanton, Chislom Park, Gilligan Street, Logan Park, Port Chalmers – Blueskin Road, Ravensbourne, Omakau Abattoirs, Ranfurly, Blue Mt Lumber (current), Seacliff Hospital, McCallum Road, Orokonui Holiday and Recreation Park, Kakanui, Benevolent, Green Island, Jubilee, Outram, Sunnyvale, Becks, Lowestoft, Andersons Bay, Aramoana, Brough Street, Edwards Bay, Karitane, Prospect Park, Scroggs Hill, Taieri Beach Road, Waikouaiti (Inverary Street), Wharf Street, Woodhaugh, Ophir, Clydevale, Edievale, Tahakopa, Maclennan, Gabriels Gully (newer), Gabriels Gully (older), Ngapara, Enfield, Oamaru, Victoria Flats, Maori Hill (Henry Street), Oval, Port Chalmers (Station Road), Waitati (old), Beamount, Kaitangata, Mt Cooee, Tapanui, Waitahuna, Epsilon Street, Lauder, Tarras, Kaka Point, Waihola, Waipahi, Naseby, Waipori Falls (newer), Waipori Falls (older), Herbert, Frasers Road, Midland Street, Taieri Road/Nairn Street, Lawrence, Owaka, Taieri Mouth, Tuapeka Mouth, Windsor, Waiwera South, Boundary Road, Inner Harbour Reclaimation, Montecillo, Opoho, Blue Mountain Lumber (older), Moeraki, Dean Street, Unity Park, Benhar, Hyde, Bernard Street, Ellis Park, Glenpark Avenue, Robin Hood Quarry, Springhill Road, and Sunflower. • The following landfills are classified as Medium Priority: Ocean Beach Domain, Morshius Subdivision, Papanui Inlet, Seacliff Hospital ‘Hay Sheds’, Long Beach, Humber Street Gas Works, Hawea, Palmerston, Glenorchy, Berwick (Maungatua Road), Goodwood, Warrington, Maia, Olbell Bridge, Makarora, Tucker Beach, Berwick (site 1), Garthmyl Road (Middlemarch), Taieri River (Middlemarch), Clinton, Coronation Park, Heriot, Clyde, Waipiata, Kingston, Berwick/Waipori River, Mt Cargill Water Trough, Waikouaiti (Edinburgh St), Odlins Timber Treatment Disposal Area, Glenomaru, Milton Sewage Treatment Plant, Albert Town, Cherry Farm, Bannockburn, and Dunback.

Solutions in Environmental Management Page 15 Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region • The following landfill sites are categorised as High Priority: Craigpine Timber Treatment Site, Patearoa, Fern Hill Tip, Roxburgh (newer), Barrowbox, Roxburgh (old), Alliance Textiles, Luggate, Ettrick Landfill, Pukeuri Works, Cromwell, St Bathans, Factory Road, Finegand Freezing Works, Wedderburn, Macraes Road, Dunstan Road - ORC Depot, Alexandra, Dukes Rd - Commercial, Wanaka, Wingatui, North Taieri, North Taieri Recycle Centre, Fairfield, Milton, Telford Farming Institute, and Sawyers Bay.

• SEMNZ recommend that the location of all landfills are entered into the Land Information New Zealand Database to ensure that future resources users are not adversely effected by any landfill discharges.

• SEMNZ recommend that the High Priority sites are investigated as per the individual recommendations listed in the site summary statements for each site in Report 1 – High Priority Landfills, Section 5.

• The numerical score sheet (Figure 1) presents the total risk values for each of the sites.

Solutions in Environmental Management Page 16 Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region

5. MEDIUM PRIORITY LANDFILL SITES This section of the report details the landfills classified as Medium Priority. These sites are Medium Risk in the ESR, and do not pose an immediate risk to the users of the surrounding environment. Information on these medium priority landfills includes: detailed site location information and comments, and a Site Location Map. The following medium landfills are presented in alphabetical order. The Otago Regional Council consents shown on the ‘Site Location Maps’ are water consents relevant to information needed for this research. These water consents include: discharge to water, surface water take, and underground water take. Because of a slight distortion of the ‘Map Info’ topographic map, the location of many of the landfills relative to the map is not exact. Precise locations of landfills should be established from the grid reference (and northings and eastings) and the legal description in the ‘Site Location Details’ information for each site. For the ESR Score Sheets and a list of the wells and relevant water consents within 5 kilometres of each landfill see Appendix A.

Symbol Key

Landfill Site Location Water Consent Well or bore

Solutions in Environmental Management Page 17 Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region

6. LOW PRIORITY LANDFILL SITES The following section of this report details the landfills classified as Low Priority. These sites are Low Risk in the ESR, and do not pose an immediate risk to the users of the surrounding environment. Information on these low priority landfills includes: detailed site location information and comments, and a Site Location Map. The following low priority landfills are presented in alphabetical order. The Otago Regional Council consents shown on the ‘Site Location Maps’ are water consents relevant to information needed for this research. These water consents include: discharge to water, surface water take, and underground water take. Because of a slight distortion of the ‘Map Info’ topographic map, the location of many of the landfills relative to the map is not exact. Precise locations of landfills should be established from the grid reference (and northings and eastings) and the legal description in the ‘Site Location Details’ information for each site. For the ESR Score Sheets and a list of the wells and relevant water consents within 5 kilometres of each landfill see Appendix B.

Symbol Key

Landfill Site Location Water Consent Well or bore

Solutions in Environmental Management Page 18 Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region

7. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of the investigation performed, SEMNZ conclude that: • The following landfills are classified as Low Priority: Uxbidge, Ocean Grove (Mr Hasties – Smails Beach), Albany Street, Westwood/Ocean View, Lake Dunstan Shoreline (possibly Old Cromwell Dump), Ocean Grove County, George Scurr, Harrington Point Road, Waitati, Millers Flat, Oturehua, Hampden, Allanton, Chislom Park, Gilligan Street, Logan Park, Port Chalmers – Blueskin Road, Ravensbourne, Omakau Abattoirs, Ranfurly, Blue Mt Lumber (current), Seacliff Hospital, McCallum Road, Orokonui Holiday and Recreation Park, Kakanui, Benevolent, Green Island, Jubilee, Outram, Sunnyvale, Becks, Lowestoft, Andersons Bay, Aramoana, Brough Street, Edwards Bay, Karitane, Prospect Park, Scroggs Hill, Taieri Beach Road, Waikouaiti (Inverary Street), Wharf Street, Woodhaugh, Ophir, Clydevale, Edievale, Tahakopa, Maclennan, Gabriels Gully (newer), Gabriels Gully (older), Ngapara, Enfield, Oamaru, Victoria Flats, Maori Hill (Henry Street), Oval, Port Chalmers (Station Road), Waitati (old), Beamount, Kaitangata, Mt Cooee, Tapanui, Waitahuna, Epsilon Street, Lauder, Tarras, Kaka Point, Waihola, Waipahi, Naseby, Waipori Falls (newer), Waipori Falls (older), Herbert, Frasers Road, Midland Street, Taieri Road/Nairn Street, Lawrence, Owaka, Taieri Mouth, Tuapeka Mouth, Windsor, Waiwera South, Boundary Road, Inner Harbour Reclaimation, Montecillo, Opoho, Blue Mountain Lumber (older), Moeraki, Dean Street, Unity Park, Benhar, Hyde, Bernard Street, Ellis Park, Glenpark Avenue, Robin Hood Quarry, Springhill Road, and Sunflower. • The following landfills are classified as Medium Priority: Ocean Beach Domain, Morshius Subdivision, Papanui Inlet, Seacliff Hospital ‘Hay Sheds’, Long Beach, Humber Street Gas Works, Hawea, Palmerston, Glenorchy, Berwick (Maungatua Road), Goodwood, Warrington, Maia, Olbell Bridge, Makarora, Tucker Beach, Berwick (site 1), Garthmyl Road (Middlemarch), Taieri River (Middlemarch), Clinton, Coronation Park, Heriot, Clyde, Waipiata, Kingston, Berwick/Waipori River, Mt Cargill Water Trough, Waikouaiti (Edinburgh St), Odlins Timber Treatment Disposal Area, Glenomaru, Milton Sewage Treatment Plant, Albert Town, Cherry Farm, Bannockburn, and Dunback. • The following landfill sites are categorised as High Priority: Craigpine Timber Treatment Site, Patearoa, Fern Hill Tip, Roxburgh (newer), Barrowbox, Roxburgh (old), Alliance Textiles, Luggate, Ettrick Landfill, Pukeuri Works, Cromwell, St Bathans, Factory Road, Finegand Freezing Works, Wedderburn, Macraes Road, Dunstan Road - ORC Depot, Alexandra, Dukes Rd - Commercial, Wanaka, Wingatui, North Taieri, North Taieri Recycle Centre, Fairfield, Milton, Telford Farming Institute, and Sawyers Bay.

• The numerical score sheet (Figure 1) presents the total risk values for each of the sites.

It should be noted that due to the anecdotal nature of much of the evidence for some ranking parameters, the quality of that data can not be assured. It is our belief, however, that the semi- quantitative ranking system used gives a good basis for the prioritisation of any future works.

Solutions in Environmental Management Page 19 Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region

8. RECOMMENDATIONS SEMNZ recommend that the location of all landfills are entered into the Land Information New Zealand Database to ensure that future resources users are not adversely effected by any landfill discharges.

SEMNZ recommend that the High Priority sites are investigated as per the individual recommendations listed in the site summary statements for each site in Report 1 – High Priority Landfills, Section 5.

Solutions in Environmental Management Page 20 Otago Regional Council Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking of Landfill Sites in Otago Region

REFERENCES

(i) Draft National Rapid Hazard Assessment System for Potentially Contaminated Sites (1993), Ministry for the Environment.

(ii) Proposed Regional Plan: Water for Otago (1998), Otago Regional Council.

(iii) Co-disposal of industrial wastes with municipal solid wastes (1990), Rushbrook, P.E., in Resources, Conservation and Recycling, V4.

(iv) Management of hazardous wastes by landfill co-disposal with municipal refuse (1985), Pohland et al., in Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, V2, No 2.

(v) Waste Management Surveys: A National Compilation of Data (1991), Royds Garden Ltd, Environmental Services

(vi) Environmental Guidelines: Solid Waste Landfills (1996), Environment Protection Authority, New South Wales.

(vii) Health and Environmental Guidelines for Selected Landfill Chemicals (1997), Ministry for the Environment.

(viii) Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Contaminated Sites (1992), Australian and New Zealand Environment & Conservation Council/National Health and Medical Research Council.

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking

APPENDIX A

ESR SCORE SHEETS, WELL AND WATER CONSENT TABLES FOR MEDIUM PRIORITY SITES

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking

APPENDIX B

ESR SCORE SHEETS, WELL AND WATER CONSENT TABLES FOR LOW PRIORITY SITES

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking

APPENDIX C

LANDFILLS NEAR WATER BODIES IDENTIFIED FOR FUTURE WATER ENHANCEMENT

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking The following landfills are situated near a surface water body identified as meeting one or more of the criteria for enhancement in Policy 6.5.5 of the Proposed Regional Policy Statement for Otago (Proposed Regional Plan: Water, Chp 7.6, Pgs. 77-79)

• Kaikorai Stream (7.6.1) - Fairfield Landfill (Blanc Estate), Bernard Street Landfill, Dean Street Landfill, Ellis Park Tip, Frasers Road Landfill, Epsilon Street Landfill, and Taieri Rd/Nairn Street Landfill. • Water of Leith (7.6.1) - Logan Park Landfill, Opoho Landfill, Prospect Park, and Maori Hill (Henry Street) Landfill. • Lower Taieri River (7.6.1) - Allanton Tip, and Outram Tip.

• Lower Kaikorai Stream (7.6.2) - Fairfield Landfill (Blanc Estate), Bernard Street Landfill, Dean Street Landfill, Ellis Park Tip, Frasers Road Landfill, Epsilon Street Landfill, and Taieri Rd/Nairn Street Landfill. • Lower Taieri River (7.6.2) - Allanton Tip, and Outram Tip. • Lower Waipori River (7.6.2) - Berwick/Waipori River Landfill, and Berwick Landfill (old site 1). • Lower Tokomairiro River (7.6.2) - Milton Landfill, Alliance Textiles Landfill (now Qualityarns), and Milton Sewage Treatment Plant Landfill. • Lower Waiareka River (7.6.2) - Enfield Landfill and Ngapara Landfill. • Lower Kaihiku Stream (7.6.2) - Waiwera South Landfill.

• Lake Tuakitoto (7.6.3) - Benhar Landfill, and possibly Stirling Landfill (site location not known). • Lake Waihola (7.6.3) - Waihola Landfill

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking

APPENDIX D

LANDFILLS WITH HAZARDOUS OR UNKNOWN TYPE OF WASTE

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking The following table lists the landfills containing hazardous or unknown types of waste. Landfills highlighted with an asterisk (*) are sites that have not being classified as high priority despite having received unknown or potentially hazardous waste. Detail of why these landfills are not classified as High Priority follows Table 2.

TABLE 2 - LANDFILLS CONTAINING HAZARDOUS OR UNKNOWN TYPES OF WASTE Landfill Name Type of Waste Disposed Craigpine Timber Treatment Disposal The waste disposal area was used for the disposal of waste Area from the local area including sawdust and waste materials from the milling operations. Barrowbox Landfill Disposal Area Disposal of hundreds of empty chemical drums, treated sawdust and waste by products from the milling operations. Cromwell Landfill Domestic, commercial and Industrial Landfill - Includes Timber Treatment waste. Pukeuri Works Landfill Unknown *Ocean Beach Domain Landfills Trade Waste Finegand Freezing Works Landfill Disposal of hazardous and commercial waste from the freezing works. Dukes Road – Commercial Landfill Commercial waste, possibly chemicals from tannery. North Taieri Landfill & Recycle Centre Includes hazardous and potentially hazardous substances such as cyanide and hospital wastes. *Humber Street Gas Works Landfill Small quantity of tar, debris, and stained soil Wingatui Landfill Domestic waste and possibly waste from the industrial mill wastes. Fairfield Landfill Disposal of domestic, commercial, hazardous and industrial Telford Farming Institute Landfill Disposal of farm waste generated from the training institute. *Odlins Timber Treatment Disposal CCA Area *Milton Sewage Treatment Plant Treatment waste sludge and clean fill Landfill Sawyers Bay Landfill Community landfill in an industrial area. *Logan Park Domestic and probably industrial waste. *Port Chalmers Landfill – Blueskin Rd Community landfill in an industrial area. *Omakau Abattoirs Animal wastes and offal *Green Island Landfill Domestic, hazardous and commercial waste

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking

TABLE 2 - LANDFILLS CONTAINING HAZARDOUS OR UNKNOWN TYPES OF WASTE Landfill Name Type of Waste Disposed *Sunnyvale Landfill Motorway construction material and domestic rubbish. *Andersons Bay Landfill Domestic landfill. Record of asbestos. *Port Chalmers Landfill – Station Road Community tip in an industrial area. *Mt Cooee Landfill Current landfill. Domestic and hazardous waste. *Waipori Falls Landfill - newer Domestic rubbish and steel etc. from the generation plant Alliance Textiles (Qualityarns) Landfill Not known *Orokonui Holiday & Recreation Park Asbestos and demolition material Landfill *Seacliff Hospital Tips Unknown (hospital had incinerators). Covered with coke. *Taieri Rd/Nairn Street Corner Landfill Refuse from the Kaikorai Tramway Coy Dunstan Road – Old ORC Depot Disposal area for empty chemical drums – some containing residual quantities. *Cherry Farm Hospital Landfill (incl. Hospital Wastes. Olbell Bridge Landfill) *McCallum Road Landfill Sawdust only. Sawdust burns occasionally.

Ocean Beach Domain Landfills: The Ocean Beach Domain Landfills were used for the disposal of domestic and trade waste from 1921 to 1958. The landfills were originally used for night-soil deposits and offensive trade waste. Trade waste is classified as tins, burnables and other. The area between John Wilson Drive and the beach consists only of demolition material. These landfills are not considered high priority due to their age, apparent lack of hazardous type of waste, and the absence of ground water and surface water users in the surrounding area. Humber Street Gas Works Landfill The Humber Street Gas Works used many tar, debris and waste products to landfill areas on site. During site demolition works the surface was scraped and surface soil was deposed of on the boulder bank which serves as a public esplanade. This site is under further investigation under a contaminated industrial sites program. Ground water is not currently used down-gradient of the site. Surface water (Pacific Ocean) lies about 5 metres to the east of the site. Odlins Timber Treatment Disposal Area This site contains chrome, copper, arsenic (CCA) residues and CCA contaminated sawdust. A site investigation (July 1999) of the area sampled the sawdust and soil in the landfill. Results showed concentrations of CCA below appropriate guidelines. There are no registered ground water or surface water users within 1 kilometre down-gradient of this site. While the results of this site investigation recommended further assessment of the site, the distance to ground water and surface water users from the landfill area and the contaminant concentrations make this landfill low immediate risk.

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking Milton Sewage Treatment Plant Landfill This landfill contains treatment waste sludge and clean fill. There are no registered surface water users within 1 kilometre downstream of the site. Groundwater 480 metres from the site is used for stock water only. Logan Park Landfill Logan Park was a domestic landfill that may have included industrial wastes. The landfill stopped receiving waste 20 to 50 years ago. There are no registered ground water or surface water users within 1 kilometre down-gradient of this site. Port Chalmers Landfill – Blueskin Road The Port Chalmers Landfill received domestic and possibly industrial waste from the Port Chalmers residential and commercial community. This landfill closed in 1963. There are no registered ground water or surface water users within 1 kilometre down-gradient of this site. Omakau Abattoirs The Omakau Abattoirs landfill is a series of pits that are capped when full. The pits are used for the disposal of animal waste and offal. There are no registered ground water or surface water users within 1 kilometre down-gradient of this site. Green Island Landfill The Green Island Landfill is the current refuse disposal area for Dunedin City residents. This landfill is a highly monitored and controlled site. There are no registered ground water or surface water users within 1 kilometre down-gradient of this site. Sunnyvale Landfill This site contains surplus material from the construction of the southern motorway. A small part of the present sports ground was used for the disposal of domestic rubbish. There are no registered ground water or surface water users within 1 kilometre down-gradient of this site. Andersons Bay Landfill Andersons Bay Landfill was a domestic tip that closed in 1948. A record in 1921 refers to ‘a load of fibre plaster and coal dust on fire at the tip’ (DCC Archives TC33, 1921/22-Reserves). The Summary of DCC Annual Reports states that some contaminated material was removed. There are no registered ground water or surface water users within 1 kilometre down-gradient of this site. Port Chalmers Landfill – Station Road This landfill replaced the tip on Blueskin Road. The Station Road Landfill closed in the early to mid 1970’s. This landfill received domestic waste from the Port Chalmers community. It is likely that industrial waste was disposed, due to the many industries in Port Chalmers at the time of this tip operating. There are no registered ground water or surface water users within 1 kilometre down- gradient of this site. Mt Cooee Landfill This landfill is currently operational and receives domestic and hazardous waste. This hazardous waste is safely stored in the landfill. This landfill is a highly managed, monitored and controlled site. There are no registered ground water or surface water users within 1 kilometre down-gradient of this site.

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking Waipori Falls Landfill – newer This landfill was used to dispose of domestic rubbish and rubbish from the electricity generation plant (e.g. steel etc.). The exact type of rubbish disposed is unknown, however, it is unlikely that hazardous waste were disposed (Mike Moeahu – Generation Manager, Trustpower). This landfill was burnt and covered weekly. Orokonui Holiday and Recreation Park This site was used in 1997 for the disposal of demolition material including asbestos. This site is capped and had an ORC discharge to land permit. It has no known surface water and ground water use within 1 kilometre down-gradient of the site Seacliff Hospital Tips The types of waste disposed at these two landfills is not known. The Seacliff Hospital did have incinerators to dispose of burnable types of waste. These landfills are likely to have been covered with the ashes from the incinerators (i.e. ‘coke’). There are no surface water users within 1 kilometre down-gradient of these landfills. A well is situated 920 metres to the east of the ‘Seacliff Hospital Landfill – Hay Sheds’, but this is probably not down-gradient. There is no ground water user within 1 kilometre down-gradient of the ‘Seacliff Hospital Tip’. Taieri Road/Nairn Street Corner Landfill The record of this landfill is from 1912. The tip was used by the Kaikorai Tramway Coy. The type of waste disposed of at this site is not known. The parcel of land containing the tip was transferred to the DCC for road widening in 1936. Part of this land parcel is now retirement blocks owned by the DCC. There are no registered ground water or surface water users within 1 kilometre down- gradient of this site. Cherry Farm Hospital Landfill (including Olbell Bridge Tip) The types of waste disposed at these two landfills is not known. The Cherry Farm Hospital did have incinerators to dispose of burnable types of waste. The Cherry Farm Landfill has no ground water users within 1 kilometre. 740 metres from the landfill is the surface water take #2929 for the Waikouaiti Town Water Supply. This ‘Cherry Farm Landfill’ closed 20 to 50 years ago and was replaced with the landfill at Olbell Bridge. Ground water within 1 kilometre of the Olbell Bridge Tip is used stock water. A surface water take 500 metres from the Olbell Bridge Tip is used for irrigation. McCallum Road Landfill This landfill contains only sawdust. This sawdust burns occasionally and therefore may produce contaminants. There are no surface water or ground water users within 1 kilometre of this site.

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking

APPENDIX E

RESULTS OF A HAZARDOUS WASTE PILOT STUDY FOR OTAGO 1983

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking The following companies were listed in a ‘Hazardous Waste Pilot Study’ conducted by the Ministry of Health, Dunedin, in 1983 (National Archives; Hazardous Waste: Pilot Study). Although 52 questionnaires were completed for this survey, SEMNZ has only included those companies that disposed of wastes at landfills. Many of the other companies used other forms of waste disposal such as the drainage system. • Ravensdown Fertiliser Works, Dunedin – private contractor disposed of waste (silica, phosphate, and vanadium pentoxide) at the Fairfield Landfill. • Otago Electroplaters, Dunedin – disposed of waste (chrome sludge) at Silverpeaks County Landfill, Brighton (probably the Fairfield Landfill – Maxwells). • Regent Oil Refining Co, Dunedin – private landfill (tarry acid sludge). Business no longer exists, no further information found. • United Engineers, Dunedin – disposed of waste (sludge containing cyanide) at North Taieri Landfill. • Waitaki NZR, Dunedin – place of waste disposal not known (askarels and polychlorinated bisphenols). • Bitumen Sales Ltd, Dunedin – disposed of waste (bitumen/water/rubbish) at Fairfield Landfill (Maxwells). This business no longer exists. • Bayley Tomkins Hedges, Green Island – disposed of waste (lime sulphide) at private contractors landfill. This business no longer exists, no further information found. • Autoreplacements, Dunedin – disposed of waste (asbestos – chrysotile) in private contractors skip. Mr Scobie has not replied to calls by SEMNZ. • H.E. Shacklocks Ltd, Dunedin (now incorporated into Fisher and Paykel) – disposed of waste (Cranodine, caustic solution, ferric sulphate, and nickel flash) at private contractors landfill. Russell Nevin from Fisher and Paykel followed this lead and suggested that Mowatt Contractors of Mosgiel may have disposed of this waste. Mr N. Mowatt of Mowatt Contractors stated that they did not deal with hazardous waste and that it is likely this waste went to the Fairfield Landfill (Maxwells). • Automachine Dunedin Ltd – disposed of waste (sulphuric acid 10% and zinc ammonium chloride) at the Fairfield Landfill (Maxwells). • Salmae Insulation, Dunedin – disposed of waste (asbestos) at the Dunedin City Council Tip (Green Island Landfill). • Mineral Technology, University of Otago – small quantities of cyanide and acid minerals presented to Health Department Dangerous Goods Store. • Department of Zoology, University of Otago – disposed of waste (xylene and C14) at the Green Island Landfill. • Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Otago – disposed of waste (ethyl ether, toluene and sulphuric acid) at the Green Island Landfill. • Central Timber Treatment, Cromwell – disposed of wastes (crystalline solid and sawdust) at the Cromwell Landfill.

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking

APPENDIX F

LANDFILL NAME WITH SEMNZ & ORC SITE ID

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking

Site # Grid Ref. SEMNZ ORC Site ID Site ID Alexandra Landfill G42:252447 COD01 34 Becks Landfill H41:507723 COD02 156 Clyde Tip G42:201525 COD03 385 Cromwell Landfill G41:101656 COD19 439 Ettrick Landfill G43:278014 COD05 539 Lauder Landfill G41:475676 COD06 843 Millers Flat Landfill G43:287006 COD07 990 Naseby Landfill H41:846706 COD08 1072 Ophir Landfill G41:418606 COD09 1192 Oturehua Landfill H41:659749 COD10 1225 Patearoa Landfill H42:789437 COD11 1241 Ranfurly Landfill H42:831597 COD12 1350 Roxburgh Landfill - new G43:218129 COD13 1413 Old Roxburgh Landfill G43:226106 COD14 NA St Bathans Landfill H41:569884 COD15 1528 Tarras Landfill G40:247923 COD16 1575 Bannockburn Landfill F41:069608 COD17 124 Craigpine Timber Treatment Landfill H41:819614 COD18 NA Lake Dunstan - pos. Old Cromwell Dump G41:102653 COD21 NA Morshius Subdivision G42:203512 COD22 1046 Odlins Timber Treatment Disposal Area H42:825595 COD23 NA Weatherall Creek G42:194530 COD24 NA Omakau Abattoirs - Moa Meats G41:419606 COD25 NA Waipiata Landfill H42:863528 COD26 NA Wedderburn Landfill H41:752709 COD27 NA Dunstan Rd - ORC Depot G42:264461 COD28 NA Enfield Landfill J41:421716 WD01 537 Hampden Landfill J42:394397 WD02 690 Herbert Landfill J42:358499 WD03 715 Kakanui Landfill J42:453579 WD04 800 Moeraki Landfill J42:425365 WD05 1026

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking Ngapara Landfill J41:331813 WD06 1130 Oamaru Landfill J41:498642 WD07 1174 Palmerston Landfill J43:305210 WD08 1234 Pukeuri Works Landfill J41:576734 WD09 1329 Humber Street Gasworks Waste Site J41:504655 WD11 NA Uxbidge Landfill J41:413860 WD10 1658 Windsor Rural Landfill J41:354764 WD12 1762 Goodwood Landfill J43:316158 WD13 NA Dunback Landfill I42:235329 WD14 NA Gilligan Street Landfill J43:309225 WD15 NA Boundary Road Landfill I43:298225 WD16 NA Factory Road Tip J43:318234 WD17 NA Brough Street Tip J43:307227 WD18 NA Glenorchy Landfill E41:463848 QLD01 662 Hawea Landfill G40:128139 QLD02 696 Kingston Landfill F42:743318 QLD03 831 Luggate Landfill G40:151011 QLD04 872 Makarora Landfill F38:086565 QLD05 894 Tucker Beach Landfill F41:741718 QLD06 1635 Victoria Flats Landfill F41:968657 QLD07 NA Wanaka Landfill F40:056035 QLD08 1708 Albert Town Landfill F40:086080 QLD09 26 Fernhill Landfill E41:668655 QLD10 NA Beaumont Landfill G44:396816 CD01 154 Clinton Landfill G46:307387 CD02 377 Clydevale Landfill G45:435477 CD03 386 Edievale Landfill G44:271839 CD04 529 Heriot Landfill G44:199762 CD05 721 Kaitangata Landfill H46:670306 CD06 798 Kaka Point Landfill H46:614212 CD07 799 Lawrence Landfill H44:538738 CD08 846 Maclennan Landfill G47:391014 CD09 884 Milton Landfill H45:768478 CD10 999 Mt Cooee Landfill H46:598357 CD11 1054

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking Owaka Landfill H46:520108 CD12 1232 Tahakopa Landfill G47:326042 CD13 1559 Taieri Mouth Landfill I45:920527 CD14 1565 Tapanui Landfill G45:215665 CD15 1571 Tuapeka Mouth Landfill G45:414608 CD16 1633 Waihola Landfill H45:854605 CD17 1682 Waipahi Landfill G45:175501 CD18 1686 Waitahuna Landfill H45:610636 CD19 1688 Waiwera South Landfill G46:382371 CD20 1692 Benhar Tip H46:623375 CD21 167 Coronation Park Landfill H46:588356 CD22 416 Lowestoft Street H46:592366 CD23 NA Milton Sewage Treatment Plant Disposal Area H45:749488 CD24 1002 Sunflower Road Landfill H46:578381 CD25 1553 Glenomaru Landfill H46:539196 CD26 NA Barrowbox Landfill Site G45:208687 CD27 NA Finegand Freezing Works Landfill H46:579326 CD28 586 Blue Mt Lumber (Prolog) Current Landfill G45:174533 CD30 NA Blue Mt Lumber (Prolog) Old Landfill G45:174532 CD31 1323 Telford Rural Polytechnic Landfill (Farming H46:572302 CD32 1594 Institute) Alliance Textiles (Qualityarns) Landfill H45:744494 CD33 44 Gabriels Gully Landfill - newer H44:524755 CD34 NA Gabriels Gully Landfill - older H44:521752 CD35 NA Taieri Beach Road Landfill I45:914542 CD36 NA Aramoana Landfill J44:316895 DCD01 68 Berwick Landfill - old site 2 H44:857700 DCD02 NA Berwick Landfill - old site 1 H45:860691 DCD03 NA Fairfield Landfill - Blanc Estate I44:085745 DCD04 563 Karitane Landfill I43:272046 DCD06 802 Middlemarch Landfill - 'Taieri River Dump' H43:866186 DCD07 NA North Taieri Landfill I44:069814 DCD08 1142 Orokonui Holiday & Recreation Park Landfill I44:216918 DCD10 1194 Sawyers Bay Landfill I44:232862 DCD11 1430

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking Waikouaiti Landfill - Edinburgh Street I43:294091 DCD12 1685 Waikouaiti Inverary Street Landfill I43:285096 DCD13 NA Waitati Landfill I44:215928 DCD14 1691 Warrington Landfill I44:219967 DCD15 1712 Andersons Bay Landfill I44:178764 DCD16 54 Dean Street Landfill I44:141796 DCD18 459 Logan Park Landfill I44:175797 DCD19 871 Midland Street Landfill I44:163764 DCD20 974 Montecillo Landfill I44:152770 DCD21 1030 North Taieri Recycle Centre I44:072814 DCD22 1143 Ocean Grove/Smails Beach I44:210751 DCD23 1182 Oval I44:156770 DCD24 1227 Prospect Park ('Maori Hill Tip') I44:164804 DCD26 1324 Frasers Road ('Roslyn Landfill') Landfill I44:137795 DCD27 609 Sunnyvale Landfill I44:092753 DCD29 1554 Unity Park Landfill I44:148774 DCD30 1649 Wharf Street Landfill I44:161773 DCD31 1728 Wingatui Landfill I44:065776 DCD32 1764 Woodhaugh Landfill I44:162816 DCD33 1768 George Scurr Landfill I44:031752 DCD34 NA Green Island Landfill - 1 I44:094748 DCD35 677 Green Island Landfill - 2 I44:090747 DCD36 677 Ocean Beach Domain - 1 I44:158746 DCD37 1181 Ocean Beach Domain - 2 I44:164747 DCD38 1181 Ocean Beach Domain - 3 I44:174748 DCD39 1181 Jubilee Park Landfill I44:148780 DCD05 792 Middlemarch Landfill - Garthmyl Road Gravel Pit H43:858171 DCD17 971 Robin Hood Quarry Landfill I44:150787 DCD44 NA Ellis Park Tip (Kaikorai Tip) I44:140793 DCD45 NA Long Beach Tip I44:265924 DCD46 NA Mt Cargill Water Trough Illegal Tip I44:215881 DCD47 NA Port Chalmers Landfill - Blueskin Road I44:245851 DCD48 NA Port Chalmers Landfill - Station Road I44:237847 DCD49 NA Bernard Street Tip I44:136772 DCD50 NA

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking Benevolent Tip I44:148759 DCD51 NA Chisolm Park Landfill I44:178752 DCD52 355 Epsilon Street Tip (Belleknowes) I44:141785 DCD53 NA Glenpark Avenue (Fox Quarry) Tip I44:143774 DCD55 646 Maori Hill Landfill (Henry Street) I44:160803 DCD56 709, 906 Springhill Road Tip I44:141771 DCD57 1527 Ravensbourne Tip I44:183790 DCD58 NA Berwick/Waipori River H45:869685 DCD59 173 Inner Harbour Reclamation I44:164766 DCD60 NA Seacliff Hospital Tip - 1 I43:245006 DCD61 NA Waitati Landfill - old I44:206930 DCD62 NA Opoho Landfill I44:179803 DCD40 1193 Maia Landfill I44:207799 DCD25 NA Edwards Bay Landfill I44:271827 DCD28 NA Harrington Point Rd Landfill J44:303856 DCD41 NA Hyde Landfill I42:953416 DCD54 NA Allanton Landfill I44:975736 DCD43 NA Outram Landfill I44:946792 DCD42 NA Seacliff Hospital Tip - 'Hay sheds' I43:247010 DCD63 NA Cherry Farm Tip I43:236074 DCD64 NA Olbell Bridge Tip I43:246082 DCD65 NA Westwood/Ocean View County Landfill I44:054713 DCD66 NA Taieri Rd/Nairn Street Tip I44:145794 DCD67 NA Dukes Rd - Commercial Landfill I44:064808 DCD68 NA Albany Street I44:174790 DCD69 25 Ocean Grove - County Tip I44:204750 DCD70 NA McCallum Road - Sawdust Landfill I43:292161 DCD71 NA Scroggs Hill Landfill I44:025709 DCD72 NA Macraes Road Tip I42:086329 DCD73 NA Papanui Inlet Landfill J44:300824 DCD74 NA Waipori Falls Tip - newer (2) H44:765724 DCD75 NA Waipori Falls Tip - older (1) H44:756748 DCD76 NA

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking

APPENDIX G

MISCELLANEOUS LANDFILLS (LOCATION NOT CONFIRMED, LANDFILL REMOVED AND CLEANFILL LANDFILLS)

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking The following list are landfills where site location is not confirmed or site has been removed: Carisbrook Embankment Landfill DCC only record of cleanfill material in Carisbrook sports grounds Quarry Road - possibly 2 sites DCC Not likely to be below 'Mosgiel' sign. DCC Metropolitan & Rural Landfill WDC WDC has no knowledge of this landfill Herbert Sawmill Landfill WDC Sawmill owners have no knowledge of ever having a landfill! Nor Liz Duggan ORC. Fairfield Landfill DCC DCC - do not know of any other tips in Fairfield except for solid fill dumping illegally on Coach Rd Upper Junction Landfill DCC No location information. Bexley Tip DCC No location information. Tomahawk Road near cemetary DCC No location information. caretakers residence Sawyers Arms Road Tip DCC No location information. Rattray Street - 1912 DCC No location information. Rhodes Tip NEV DCC No location information. Possibly the Bowling Green area York Place Tip - 1912 DCC No location information. Beggot Ash Tip - 1913 DCC No location information. Bell' 1913 DCC No location information. Bowling Green Tip NEV DCC No location information. Caversham 1912 DCC No location information. Cumberland Street 1912 DCC No location information. Glen Estate Mornington DCC No location information. High Street 1912 DCC No location information. Leith 1912 DCC No location information. South' 1912 DCC No location information. South Dunedin 1912 DCC No location information. Steep Street 1913 DCC No location information. Stuart Street DCC No location information. Wanaka Street Tip - west harbour DCC No location information. Burkes ash tipping DCC No location information. Blanket Bay Road Dump DCC No location information. Moa Meats Landfill CODC Business has changed hands and former owner not locatable. Lawyers Head Burning Tip DCC No location information.

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking Stirling Landfill CDC No location information. Former Bruce County. 1977 arrangements to close. Arrowtown Landfill (3 tips) QLDC Contact Mr Reid (03) 4421-729 Regent Oil Refining Co - private DCC Not in phone book. contractors landfill Bayley Tomkins Hedges - private DCC Not in phone book. contractors landfill Sydney Street DCC Excavated and removed for construction of southern motorway. Was underneath a playing field near Holland St. Pt secs 23 & 26, TN of Caversham. Weatherall Creek DCC Excavated and capped for Lake Dunstan Lake Dunstan Shoreline – near CODC Excavated and removed for Lake Dunstan Sunhaven Orchard G41:121675 Autoreplacements - private contractors DCC Contact Mr Scobie will not reply to SEMNZ calls. landfill H. E. Shacklocks Ltd - private DCC Followed lead but no confirmation of contractors. contractors landfill

The following list are ‘Cleanfill’ landfills: John Clearwater Contracting Cleanfill DCC Peninsula Contracting DCC Orokonui Inlet - Cleanfill DCC Patmos Avenue Cleanfill DCC Greenacre Rd Cleanfill DCC Church Pit - not Tip (gravel pit used to dump sawdust) CODC Emerson Reserve Cleanfill DCC Somerville Street Landfill (northern end) DCC Firth Industries Landfill – I44:095749 DCC Gorge Rd fill - site QLDC 12 Mile (Fulton Hogan/QLDC) QLDC Beaver Contracting/Fulton Hogan - Remarkables QLDC Paver - Hawea Flat QLDC Works Civil - Tucker Beach Rd QLDC Hawea Dam Construction Landfill – G40:122164 QLDC Little Hoopers Inlet Tip DCC

Solutions in Environmental Management Central Otago District Council Landfill Sites – Report on Environmental Sensitivity Ranking

The following list are landfills listed in the original ORC Landfill list that have more than one name: Town Belt Mornington – (Unity Park) DCC Roslyn Landfill – (Frasers Road) DCC Ross Corner & Musselburgh Rise - ABT – Inlet (Andersons Bay Landfill) DCC Henry Street Tip – (Maori Hill Tip) DCC Peninsula County - Edwards Bay, Papanui Inlet, Little Hoopers Inlet, DCC Harrington Point Road

Solutions in Environmental Management