DOCSLIB.ORG

Point of View and Characterization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Point of View and Characterization PointPoint ofof ViewView andand CharacterizationCharacterization HowHow authorsauthors useuse thesethese toto moldmold theirtheir writingwriting “Point“Point ofof viewview isis thethe mostmost complexcomplex elementelement ofof fiction…Itfiction…It isis aa relationshiprelationship amongamong writer,writer, character,character, andand reader.”reader.” -Janet-Janet BurrowayBurroway Preface:Preface: TypesTypes ofof characterscharacters ProtagonistProtagonist WhoWho thethe storystory isis aboutabout OftenOften thethe “good“good guy”guy” UsuallyUsually changeschanges withwith thethe climaxclimax AntagonistAntagonist TheThe charactercharacter oror forceforce whowho isis workingworking againstagainst thethe protagonist.protagonist. OftenOften thethe “bad“bad guy”guy” ProtagonistProtagonist examplesexamples ToTo KillKill aa MockingbirdMockingbird?? AtticusAtticus FinchFinch TwoTwo Friends?Friends? MorrisotMorrisot a andnd SauvageSauvage StarStar WarsWars?? DarthDarth VaderVader // AnakinAnakin SkywalkerSkywalker AntagonistAntagonist examplesexamples ToTo KillKill aa MockingbirdMockingbird?? BobBob EwellEwell – – utterutter disregarddisregard forfor otherother peoplepeople TwoTwo FriendsFriends ?? TheThe PrussiansPrussians StarStar WarsWars ?? Debatable:Debatable: couldcould bebe thethe Emperor,Emperor, thethe DarkDark Side,Side, etc.etc. PARTPART 1:1: PointPoint ofof ViewView BasicsBasics POVPOV isis thethe perspectiveperspective thatthat aa storystory isis toldtold in.in. HowHow aa storystory isis toldtold JDJD fromfrom ScrubsScrubs StoriesStories areare toldtold inin firstfirst oror thirdthird personperson POV.POV. FirstFirst PersonPerson POVPOV ToldTold fromfrom thethe Pros:Pros: perspectiveperspective ofof CreatesCreates sensesense ofof someonesomeone intimacyintimacy withwith involvedinvolved inin thethe reader.reader. story.story. StoryStory directeddirected atat us.us. NarratorNarrator refersrefers toto him/herselfhim/herself Cons:Cons: asas “I”.“I”. WeWe onlyonly seesee thatthat person’sperson’s OftenOften thoughts.thoughts. protagonistprotagonist ofof IsIs thethe narratornarrator story.story. reliable?reliable? AreAre theythey lying?lying? ThirdThird PersonPerson POVPOV NarratorNarrator isis notnot Ex:Ex: OnOn hishis handshands partpart ofof story.story. andand knees,knees, thethe UseUse pronounspronouns curatorcurator froze,froze, likelike “he,“he, she,she, his,his, turningturning hishis headhead hers,hers, it,”it,” or or slowly.slowly. “they.”“they.” -The-The DaDa VinciVinci CodeCode “Fly“Fly onon thethe wall”wall” storytellingstorytelling TypicallyTypically unbiased;unbiased; neutralneutral narratornarrator TwoTwo typestypes ofof ThirdThird PersonPerson POVPOV LimitedLimited NarratorNarrator focusesfocuses onon oneone centralcentral character.character. OftenOften protagonistprotagonist “Inside”“Inside” character character OmniscientOmniscient CanCan seesee intointo thoughtsthoughts andand feelingsfeelings ofof allall characterscharacters “Omniscient”“Omniscient” means means “all-knowing”“all-knowing” WhatWhat questionsquestions dodo youyou have?have? PartPart II:II: CharacterizationCharacterization Direct,Direct, indirect,indirect, typestypes WhatWhat isis characterization?characterization? CharacterizationCharacterization isis thethe actact ofof creatingcreating andand developingdeveloping aa character.character. DirectDirect CharacterizationCharacterization InIn directdirect characterizationcharacterization,, thethe authorauthor directlydirectly statesstates aa character’scharacter’s traits.traits. Ex:Ex: “Part“Part concon man,man, partpart practicalpractical joker,joker, andand partpart DonDon Juan.”Juan.” IndirectIndirect CharacterizationCharacterization IndirectIndirect characterizationcharacterization Ex:Ex: HarpoHarpo isis whenwhen aa character’scharacter’s puzzlepuzzle byby personality is shown personality is shown Shug.Shug. OneOne throughthrough hishis oror herher actions,actions, thoughts,thoughts, reasonreason isis sheshe feelings,feelings, words,words, andand saysay whateverwhatever appearance,appearance, oror throughthrough comecome toto anotheranother character’scharacter’s mind,mind, forgitforgit observationsobservations andand aboutabout polite.polite. reactions.reactions. -The-The ColorColor PurplePurple WhatWhat conclusionconclusion cancan youyou makemake aboutabout Shug?Shug? ThatThat sheshe isis shyshy ThatThat sheshe isis opinionatedopinionated ThatThat sheshe isis marriedmarried ThatThat sheshe likeslikes HarpoHarpo RoundRound && FlatFlat CharactersCharacters RoundRound characterscharacters showshow manymany differentdifferent traits:traits: FaultsFaults asas wellwell asas virtuesvirtues FlatFlat characterscharacters areare onlyonly seenseen oneone wayway throughoutthroughout thethe storystory RoundRound CharactersCharacters WhoWho mightmight youyou thinkthink ofof thatthat showsshows differentdifferent traits?traits? ScoutScout fromfrom MockingbirdMockingbird MontaguesMontagues and and CapuletsCapulets fromfrom RomeoRomeo && JulietJuliet BartBart SimpsonSimpson FlatFlat CharactersCharacters WhoWho mightmight youyou thinkthink ofof thatthat showsshows onlyonly oneone purposepurpose throughoutthroughout aa story?story? JemJem fromfrom MockingbirdMockingbird TybaltTybalt from from RomeoRomeo && JulietJuliet MilhouseMilhouse DynamicDynamic andand StaticStatic CharactersCharacters DynamicDynamic characterscharacters StaticStatic characterscharacters developdevelop andand growgrow dodo notnot change.change. duringduring thethe coursecourse ofof Ex:Ex: LordLord thethe story.story. VoldemortVoldemort Ex:Ex: HarryHarry PotterPotter Ex:Ex: AtticusAtticus Ex:Ex: Scout;Scout; JemJem ReviewReview FirstFirst personperson pros/conspros/cons ThirdThird personperson pros/conspros/cons ProtagonistProtagonist V.V. AntagonistAntagonist WhatWhat isis characterization?characterization? DirectDirect V.V. IndirectIndirect CharacterizationCharacterization RoundRound V.V. FlatFlat CharactersCharacters StaticStatic V.V. DynamicDynamic CharactersCharacters .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Problems of Mimetic Characterization in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy
    Illusion and Instrument: Problems of Mimetic Characterization in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy By Chloe Susan Liebmann Kitzinger A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Irina Paperno, Chair Professor Eric Naiman Professor Dorothy J. Hale Spring 2016 Illusion and Instrument: Problems of Mimetic Characterization in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy © 2016 By Chloe Susan Liebmann Kitzinger Abstract Illusion and Instrument: Problems of Mimetic Characterization in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy by Chloe Susan Liebmann Kitzinger Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures University of California, Berkeley Professor Irina Paperno, Chair This dissertation focuses new critical attention on a problem central to the history and theory of the novel, but so far remarkably underexplored: the mimetic illusion that realist characters exist independently from the author’s control, and even from the constraints of form itself. How is this illusion of “life” produced? What conditions maintain it, and at what points does it start to falter? My study investigates the character-systems of three Russian realist novels with widely differing narrative structures — Tolstoy’s War and Peace (1865–1869), and Dostoevsky’s The Adolescent (1875) and The Brothers Karamazov (1879–1880) — that offer rich ground for exploring the sources and limits of mimetic illusion. I suggest, moreover, that Tolstoy and Dostoevsky themselves were preoccupied with this question. Their novels take shape around ambitious projects of characterization that carry them toward the edges of the realist tradition, where the novel begins to give way to other forms of art and thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Inflationary and Deflationary Characterization in the Novels of Ayi Kwei Armah
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE): E-Journals Research on Humanities and Social Sciences www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1719 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2863 (Online) Vol.3, No.17, 2013 Inflationary and Deflationary Characterization in the Novels of Ayi Kwei Armah Peace Ibala Amala Ph.D. Department of English, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Rumuolumeni, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. Abstract It is a truism of course, that much of the pleasure of contemporary readers comes from the study of characters. For every literary work is an artistic response of the perception of man and his society. The purpose of this paper is to examine how Ayi Kwei Armah employs the Inflationary and deflationary technique of characterization which is shown to be his foremost stylistic method in his novels. Armah does so by revealing that his technique is a means of objective correlative, meaningful within the African society. Armah’s technique as this study reveals brings to the fore that characters who perpetrate corruption and the destructiveness inherent in the African continent are deflated. And morally upright characters are presented in the inflationary mode. Introduction It is common critical knowledge that the basis of fictional writingis character creation, perhaps nothing else. Characters not only add depth and complexity to the novels by giving readers perspectives of situations, but keep the readers engaged at all times. Armah is one of the African novelists that has continually captivated his readers for the experimental quality of his literary output (Wright 12, Obiechina 53, Folarin 117, Fraser ix ); the yardstick of experimentation in African fiction (Ogungbesan 68 ).
    [Show full text]
  • The Idea of Mimesis: Semblance, Play, and Critique in the Works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 8-2012 The idea of mimesis: Semblance, play, and critique in the works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno Joseph Weiss DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Weiss, Joseph, "The idea of mimesis: Semblance, play, and critique in the works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno" (2012). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 125. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/125 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Idea of Mimesis: Semblance, Play, and Critique in the Works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy October, 2011 By Joseph Weiss Department of Philosophy College of Liberal Arts and Sciences DePaul University Chicago, Illinois 2 ABSTRACT Joseph Weiss Title: The Idea of Mimesis: Semblance, Play and Critique in the Works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno Critical Theory demands that its forms of critique express resistance to the socially necessary illusions of a given historical period. Yet theorists have seldom discussed just how much it is the case that, for Walter Benjamin and Theodor W.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of Patrick Chakaipa's 'Rudo Ibofu'
    Journal of English and literature Vol. 2(1). pp. 1-9, January 2011 Available online http://www.academicjournals.org/ijel ISSN 2141-2626 ©2011 Academic Journals Review Epistemological and moral implications of characterization in African literature: A critique of Patrick Chakaipa’s ‘Rudo Ibofu’ (love is blind) Munyaradzi Mawere Department of Humanities, Universidade Pedagogica, Mozambique. E-mail: [email protected]. Accepted 26 November, 2010 This paper examines African epistemology and axiology as expressed in African literature through characterization, and it adopts the Zimbabwean Patrick Chakaipa’s novel, Rudo Ibofu as a case study. It provides a preliminary significance of characterization in Zimbabwean literature and by extension African literature before demonstrating how characterization has been ‘abused’ by some African writers since colonialism in Africa. The consequences are that a subtle misconstrued image of Africa can indirectly or directly be perpetuated within the academic settings. The Zimbabwean novel as one example of African literature that extensively employs characterization, it represents Africa. The mode of this work is reactionary in the sense that it is responding directly to trends identifiable in African literature spheres. The paper therefore is a contribution towards cultural revival and critical thinking in Africa where the wind of colonialism in the recent past has significantly affected the natives’ consciousness. In the light of the latter point, the paper provides a corrective to the western gaze that demonized Africa by advancing the view that Africans were without a history, worse still epistemological and moral systems. The paper thus criticizes, dismantles and challenges the inherited colonial legacies which have injured many African scientists and researchers’ consciousness; it is not only against the vestiges of colonialism, but of neo-colonialism and western cultural arrogance that have been perpetuated by some African writers through characterization.
    [Show full text]
  • CHARACTERIZATION in FICTION HONORS THESIS Presented to The
    CHARACTERIZATION IN FICTION HONORS THESIS Presented to the Honors Committee of Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Graduation in the Honors College by Jack Reams San Marcos, Texas May 2015 CHARACTERIZATION IN FICTION Thesis Supervisor: ________________________________ John M. Blair, Ph.D. Department of English Second Reader: __________________________________ Twister Marquiss, M.F.A Department of English Approved: ____________________________________ Heather C. Galloway, Ph.D. Dean, Honors College Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 P.A.R.T.S of Characterization .............................................................................................4 Direct Characterization ......................................................................................................15 Indirect Characterization ....................................................................................................30 Conclusion .........................................................................................................................43 Abstract The purpose of my thesis is to examine the importance of characterization in fiction, as well as the methods of characterization itself. The scope of the paper will be primarily limited to three works of
    [Show full text]
  • Genre, Characterization, and Cognition
    Chapter 1 Genre, Characterization, and Cognition 1 Genre Recognition and Character Cognition How do you recognize a detective story when you see one? Is it a constellation of expected features? A list of necessary elements? A “family resemblance” with other detective stories? Do the author’s intentions make it a detective story? Or is it a detective story for social and paratextual reasons—the publish- ing house, the jacket illustration, where it is shelved at a library or bookstore, the literary tastes of the friend who recommended it? Versions of all these ap- proaches have been used to theorize genre, both at the abstract, universal level and also in connection to specific cultures, places, and times. The proposition explored in this book is that generic connections are forged by readers attend- ing to what characters’ minds are doing—what characters are represented as wanting, thinking, and otherwise cogitating. Central to the detective story genre is a detective character that solves a mystery. Perhaps a corpse is discovered under suspicious circumstances; the authorities are engaged; the detective takes the case and works from hunches, inferences, and deduction to find and apprehend the culprit. The reader expe- riences the narrative by sharing in the initial confusion of the still-living char- acters, by following the detective’s reasoning process as he or she solves the case, and then celebrating vicariously when the perpetrator is identified and apprehended. My reader might now object that there are dozens of ways in which the schema just articulated fails to account for many detective stories. Potential variables are legion.
    [Show full text]
  • ELEMENTS of FICTION – NARRATOR / NARRATIVE VOICE Fundamental Literary Terms That Indentify Components of Narratives “Fiction
    Dr. Hallett ELEMENTS OF FICTION – NARRATOR / NARRATIVE VOICE Fundamental Literary Terms that Indentify Components of Narratives “Fiction” is defined as any imaginative re-creation of life in prose narrative form. All fiction is a falsehood of sorts because it relates events that never actually happened to people (characters) who never existed, at least not in the manner portrayed in the stories. However, fiction writers aim at creating “legitimate untruths,” since they seek to demonstrate meaningful insights into the human condition. Therefore, fiction is “untrue” in the absolute sense, but true in the universal sense. Critical Thinking – analysis of any work of literature – requires a thorough investigation of the “who, where, when, what, why, etc.” of the work. Narrator / Narrative Voice Guiding Question: Who is telling the story? …What is the … Narrative Point of View is the perspective from which the events in the story are observed and recounted. To determine the point of view, identify who is telling the story, that is, the viewer through whose eyes the readers see the action (the narrator). Consider these aspects: A. Pronoun p-o-v: First (I, We)/Second (You)/Third Person narrator (He, She, It, They] B. Narrator’s degree of Omniscience [Full, Limited, Partial, None]* C. Narrator’s degree of Objectivity [Complete, None, Some (Editorial?), Ironic]* D. Narrator’s “Un/Reliability” * The Third Person (therefore, apparently Objective) Totally Omniscient (fly-on-the-wall) Narrator is the classic narrative point of view through which a disembodied narrative voice (not that of a participant in the events) knows everything (omniscient) recounts the events, introduces the characters, reports dialogue and thoughts, and all details.
    [Show full text]
  • Literary Terms-Key
    Malcolm Literary Terms ________________________ English 11 Name 1. Allegory – A story with 2 levels of meaning: literal and symbolic 2. Alliteration – Repetition of a consonant sound at beginning of words. 3. Allusion – Reference to well-known people, places, events, work of literature, etc. 4. Ambiguity – When a statement contains 2 or more possible meanings. (“I promise I’ll give you a ring tomorrow.”) 5. Ambivalence – The state of having 2 opposing feelings toward a person or thing at the same time. (“Can’t live with you, can’t live without you.”) 6. Analogy – The comparison of a new idea to a well-known idea to aid in comprehension 7. Anecdote – A brief story about an interesting, unusual, or humorous event 8. Antagonist – Character or force in conflict with the main character. (The Joker, The Green Goblin) 9. Antanaclasis – Stylistic repetition of a word utilizing different definitions of the word each time (“We must all hang together, or assuredly we will all hang together.”) 10.Antithesis – The use of phrases with opposite meanings in close conjunction. (“One small step for man; one giant leap for mankind.”) 11.Aphorism – A general truth or observation about life, often witty. (An apple a day keeps the doctor away.) 12.Apostrophe – figure of speech in which the writer directly addresses the reader or an absent/abstract idea. (Build thee more stately mansions, oh my soul.) 13.Aside – In drama, a short passage that an actor speaks to the audience and the other characters pretend they cannot hear. 14.Assonance – repetition of vowel sounds. (Ashley asked for applesauce after her anchovies.) 15.Autobiography – Work of nonfiction in which the author writes about his/her own life.
    [Show full text]
  • What Does It Mean to Be a Redhead in Literature?
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Honors Theses Honors College Spring 5-2015 The Importance of Appearances in Literature: What Does It Mean to Be a Redhead in Literature? Chelsea J. Anderson University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/honors_theses Part of the Children's and Young Adult Literature Commons Recommended Citation Anderson, Chelsea J., "The Importance of Appearances in Literature: What Does It Mean to Be a Redhead in Literature?" (2015). Honors Theses. 274. https://aquila.usm.edu/honors_theses/274 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi The Importance of Appearances in Literature: What Does It Mean to Be a Redhead in Literature? by Chelsea Anderson A Thesis Submitted to the Honors College of The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in the Department of English May 2015 ii Approved by ____________________________________ Alexandra Valint, Ph. D., Thesis Adviser Assistant Professor of English ____________________________________ Eric Tribunella, Ph. D., Chair Department of English ____________________________________ Ellen Weinauer, Ph.D., Dean Honors College iii Abstract In literature, appearances always seem to play a major part of each character. The physical descriptions of each character are important to the development of the story. Therefore, it seems that a character’s physical appearance becomes an important part of character development, and his/her physical traits help to determine the type of character he/she will be.
    [Show full text]
  • Paratextual and Bibliographic Traces of the Other Reader in British Literature, 1760-1897
    Illinois State University ISU ReD: Research and eData Theses and Dissertations 9-22-2019 Beyond The Words: Paratextual And Bibliographic Traces Of The Other Reader In British Literature, 1760-1897 Jeffrey Duane Rients Illinois State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Educational Methods Commons, and the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Rients, Jeffrey Duane, "Beyond The Words: Paratextual And Bibliographic Traces Of The Other Reader In British Literature, 1760-1897" (2019). Theses and Dissertations. 1174. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/1174 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ISU ReD: Research and eData. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ISU ReD: Research and eData. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BEYOND THE WORDS: PARATEXTUAL AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC TRACES OF THE OTHER READER IN BRITISH LITERATURE, 1760-1897 JEFFREY DUANE RIENTS 292 Pages Over the course of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, compounding technological improvements and expanding education result in unprecedented growth of the reading audience in Britain. This expansion creates a new relationship with the author, opening the horizon of the authorial imagination beyond the discourse community from which the author and the text originate. The relational gap between the author and this new audience manifests as the Other Reader, an anxiety formation that the author reacts to and attempts to preempt. This dissertation tracks these reactions via several authorial strategies that address the alienation of the Other Reader, including the use of prefaces, footnotes, margin notes, asterisks, and poioumena.
    [Show full text]
  • An Untitled Exploration of Character and Power Distribution in Some Of
    An Untitled Exploration of Character and Power Distribution In Some of the Work of David Foster Wallace Sophia Eyerman Senior Thesis November 24, 2013 1 On a whole, David Foster Wallace’s fiction, specifically his first novel, Broom of the System (1987) and his collection of short stories, Brief Interviews with Hideous Men (1999), delve into questions surrounding the power of narration and language and the psychological complexity of not only gender relations, but human interaction generally. Both of these fictive works use mind-bending literary tactics to depict dynamic female characters while also successfully avoiding simplification of their voices or robbing them of independent power. In Broom of the System, the arranger and narrator cultivate a connection with Lenore that respects her desire for silence, and ultimately frees her from her prison of language. In Brief Interviews, the power and characterization of the interviewer is displaced throughout her selections despite her silence within the diegesis, while the arranger ultimately subjugates her power to emphasize the general human condition. Both of these fictional pieces, through their fragmentation and shifting power hierarchy, encourage readers to consider the ultimate power of the narrator over characters and reality in relation to gender interaction, and more generally, individual control over one’s life. Wallace’s essay collection, A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again (1997), maintains similar tone and subject matter but contrasts greatly from his fiction. While his two fictional pieces call into question (and even satirize) the inherent narcissistic quality and the fault of scope of first person point of view, both “A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again” and “Getting Away from Already Being Away from It All” are mediated by the first person character-narrator of Wallace himself.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson Skill: Understanding Indirect Characterization
    English Enhanced Scope and Sequence Lesson Skill: Understanding indirect characterization Strand Reading--fiction SOL 6.5 7.5 8.5 Materials • Television show, short story, or fiction film that presents at least two contrasting characters • Copies of the Says, Does, Thinks: Character Traits Revealed! worksheet Lesson Direct characterization. The writer makes direct statements about a character's personality and tells the reader or viewer what the character is like. Direct characterization tells the reader or viewer. Indirect characterization. The writer reveals information about a character’s personality through that character's words, actions, and thoughts, along with other characters’ responses to that character (what they say and think about him/her). Indirect characterization shows the reader or viewer. 1. Review the various definitions of the word character, and list them on the board for students to record. Ask them to name some of their favorite characters from literature, TV programs, or films. Ask why these characters are favorites. What are the character traits of these persons that make them so appealing? 2. Ask how the reader of literature or viewer of TV programs or films learns the character traits of a character. Students should respond that we learn character traits by what the author tells us, either directly or through the words of other characters (direct characterization). Beyond that, we learn character traits by what a character does, says, and thinks (indirect characterization). Therefore, characterization is defined not only by what is said or told directly about a character, but also by what the character’s words, actions, and thoughts show, just as in real life.
    [Show full text]