Testing Different Membrane Filters for 16S Rrna Gene-Based Metabarcoding in Karstic Springs
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
water Article Testing Different Membrane Filters for 16S rRNA Gene-Based Metabarcoding in Karstic Springs Oana Teodora Moldovan 1,* , Andreea Baricz 2,3,4,*, Edina Szekeres 2,3,4, Marius Kenesz 1, 5 5 6 Marial Alexandra Hoaghia , Erika Andrea Levei , Ionut, Cornel Mirea , Ruxandra Năstase-Bucur 1 , Traian Brad 1 , Iulia Chiciudean 2,3 and Horia Leonard Banciu 2,3 1 Emil Racovitza Institute of Speleology, Cluj Department, Clinicilor 5, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; [email protected] (M.K.); [email protected] (R.N.-B.); [email protected] (T.B.) 2 Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Babes, -Bolyai University, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; [email protected] (E.S.); [email protected] (I.C.); [email protected] (H.L.B.) 3 Centre for Systems Biology, Biodiversity and Bioresources, Babes, -Bolyai University, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania 4 National Institute of Research and Development for Biological Sciences, Institute of Biological Research, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania 5 National Institute for Research and Development of Optoelectronics Bucharest INOE 2000, Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation Subsidiary, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; [email protected] (M.A.H.); [email protected] (E.A.L.) 6 Emil Racovitza Institute of Speleology, Calea 13 Septembrie 13, 050711 Bucures, ti, Romania; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (O.T.M.); [email protected] (A.B.) Received: 8 October 2020; Accepted: 29 November 2020; Published: 3 December 2020 Abstract: Introduction: Karstic springs are used worldwide by rural communities as sources of fresh water for humans and livestock. In Romania, one-third of the population has no direct access to a public water supply. The present study is part of a country-wide project to develop simple, quick and cheap methods for seasonal environmental and microbiological monitoring of karstic springs used as drinking water by rural populations. Critical steps for monitoring workflow consist of evaluating water quality and selecting suitable membrane filters to efficiently capture environmental DNA for further microbial diversity estimation using 16S rRNA gene-based metabarcoding. Methods: Several commercial membrane filters of different compositions and pore sizes were tested on the water sampled from three karstic springs in Romania, followed by water chemistry and whole community 16S rRNA gene-based metabarcoding analysis. Results: We found that different types of applied membrane filters provide varying recovery in diversity and abundance of both overall and pathogenic bacteria. Conclusions: The result of the experiment with different filters shows that mixed cellulose ester, cellulose acetate, and nitrate membranes of 0.20 and 0.22 µm are the best for amplicon-based metabarcoding monitoring of karst springs. Keywords: spring water; karst; 16S rRNA gene; membrane filters; metabarcoding; pathogenic bacteria 1. Introduction A recent review [1] considered the main environmental drivers for 21st century global trends regarding freshwater availability. Changes in freshwater availability not only impact regional food supplies, human and ecosystem health and energy generation but also cause social unrest [1]. Half of the world’s population use groundwater for domestic needs [2], and groundwater provides 38% of the global consumptive irrigation water demand [3]. Yet groundwater monitoring and management are challenging tasks for the vastness and unseen distribution of these freshwater sources, mainly found Water 2020, 12, 3400; doi:10.3390/w12123400 www.mdpi.com/journal/water Water 2020, 12, 3400 2 of 16 in soluble rocks such as limestones and dolomites. The high demand for food, in conjunction with climate change, has resulted in economic and social hardships already reported in many parts of the world and are foreseen to accelerate the depletion of available groundwater sources used for drinking and agriculture [4]. The 2006–2017 Eurostat survey (published in 2020, [5]) shows that 5 out of 12 European countries have less than 90% of households connected to a public water supply, with Romania ranked at the lowest percentage of 67.5%. One cause of this shortcoming might be the sparse distribution of houses in most rural areas that makes access to a public water supply problematic if not impossible. Small rural populations use local sources of water that are not under the monitoring programs of water agencies. Usually, such small local sources that come from porous karstic rocks are prone to periods of low or no flow or a combination of low flow and a concentration of contaminants [6]. The primary sources of contamination in small rural localities are from livestock, septic tanks, mining activities in the area and the use of chemicals in agricultural practices [7]. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding was proposed as a viable alternative for freshwater quality assessment [8] as it quickly and sensitively reveals the taxonomic inventory of eukaryotic [9,10] or prokaryotic communities [11]. Recently, eDNA metabarcoding has proven to be a useful tool to detect waterborne pathogens in rural surface freshwater impacted by faecal pollution [12] and antibiotic-contaminated groundwater [13]. Surprisingly, little information exists on the microbiological quality of groundwater sources that are used as drinking water in rural areas worldwide. In most, if not all, of the cases, the detection of Escherichia coli as a representative of coliform bacteria is the only microbiological test to check the potential for waterborne diseases [14]. This approach is unable to detect other dangerous bacteria, including pathogenic or opportunistic species bearing antibiotic resistance traits [15]. In this light, eDNA metabarcoding appears to be a novel and feasible approach to assess the microbial diversity of groundwater sources for drinking water in rural areas. For rural populations that use spring water as their main source of fresh water, our purpose was to test and propose tools and protocols for seasonal water quality monitoring [16]. Within the framework of this country-wide project, we performed a survey on the physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of selected karst springs to establish a fast and cost-effective monitoring protocol. We aimed to evaluate the most suitable membrane filter type and filtration strategy to efficiently recover environmental DNA (eDNA) for further fast and accurate whole community diversity assessment using 16S rRNA gene-based metabarcoding. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Sampling and Sample Preparation Three springs were chosen for their ease of access from Cluj-Napoca (Romania), the headquarters of logistics and the authors. Banpotoc, Băit, a (Baita) and Rapolt, el (Rapoltel) springs are located in the Apuseni Mountains in northwestern Romania (Figure1). These springs are the only sources of water used by the local populations as drinking water resources for human and livestock consumption and are not included in the national or local water monitoring programs. In September 2019, samples of spring water were collected from each of the three springs in sterile polyethylene bottles. Bottles were rinsed three times with the sample water and kept refrigerated at 4 ◦C until chemical analysis. Five liters of water were filtered under aseptic conditions using a vacuum pump and a filtering device, composed of a glass filter holder and a funnel, attached to a collecting Kitasato flask. Nine different types of membrane filters with different pore sizes were tested for their efficiency in retaining biomass that sourced for eDNA from karstic spring water (Table1). After filtration, each membrane was cut into small pieces and kept in a sterile Petri dish at 20 C until − ◦ eDNA extraction. Water 2020, 12, 3400 3 of 16 Water 2020, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 15 FigureFigure 1.1. ((aa)) TheThe locationlocation of the three tested karstic karstic sp springsrings in in Romania Romania and and photos photos taken taken during during the the samplingsampling campaigncampaign ((((bb)) == Baita, ( c)) = Banpotoc,Banpotoc, (d (d) )== Rapoltel).Rapoltel). TableTable 1.1. The tested membrane filters filters for metabarcoding metabarcoding in in karstic karstic spring spring water. water. Membrane Porosity Fabric Producer Porosity Sterile * Price ** MembraneCode Code Fabric Producer (µm) Sterile * Price ** (µm) PESPES polyethersulfonepolyethersulfone MilliporeMillipore 0.220.22 sterilizedsterilized High High PVDF polyvinylidene fluoride Millipore 0.22 sterilized High PVDF polyvinylidene fluoride Millipore 0.22 sterilized High NC cellulose nitrate Macherey-Nagel 0.20 sterilized Low NYLONNC nyloncellulose nitrate FioroniMacherey-Nagel 0.22 0.20 sterilizedsterilized Low Low MCE_aNYLON mixed cellulosenylon ester FioroniFioroni 0.220.22 sterilesterilized Low Low MCE_bMCE_a mixedmixed cellulose cellulose ester ester WhatmanFioroni 0.200.22 sterilesterile MediumLow S-PakMCE_b mixedmixed cellulose cellulose ester ester MerckWhatman 0.200.20 sterilesterile Medium Low PSR009S-Pak cellulosemixed acetate cellulose and nitrate ester NahitaMerck 0.220.20 sterilizedsterile Low Low PSR010 cellulose acetate and nitrate Nahita 0.45 sterilized Low PSR009 cellulose acetate and nitrate Nahita 0.22 sterilized Low * We termedPSR010 ‘sterile’ thosecellulose membrane acetate filters and provided nitrate sterile byNahita the manufacturer 0.45 and ‘sterilized’sterilized those membraneLow filters provided non-sterile and further steam-sterilized at 121 ◦C for 20