DOCSLIB.ORG

Beef Production System Guidelines Beef Production System Guidelines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Beef Production System Guidelines Beef Production System Guidelines Animal & Grassland Research & Innovation Programme BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEM GUIDELINES BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEM GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION 03 Under 16 Month Bull Beef (Suckler) (High Concentrate) 04 Under 16 Month Bull Beef (Suckler) 06 Under 16 Month Bull Beef (Dairy Calf to Beef) 08 18 - 20 Month Suckler Bull Beef 10 18 -20 Month Bull Beef (Dairy Calf to Beef) 12 19 Month Early Maturing Heifer Beef (Dairy Calf to Beef) 14 20 Month Heifer Beef (Suckler Bred) 16 20 Month Steer Beef (Suckler Bred) 18 23 Month Early Maturing Steer Beef (Dairy Calf to Beef) 20 24 Month Heifer Beef (Suckler) 22 24 Month Steer Beef (Suckler) 24 24 Month Friesian Steer Beef (Dairy Calf to Beef) 26 26 Month Early Maturing Steer Beef (Dairy Calf to Beef) 28 28 Month Steer Beef (Suckler) 30 Although the author and Teagasc have made reasonable efforts to ensure that the information in this book was correct at time of going to press, the author and Teagasc do not assume and hereby disclaim and liability to any party for any loss, damage, or disruption caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident, or any other cause. Reasonable efforts have also been made to ensure the reliability of websites listed in this publication but inclusion of these cannot be taken as an endorsement of these sites. 2 WWW.TEAGASC.IE BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEM GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEM GUIDELINES Beef farming in Ireland is characterised by many of keeping the suckler cow will depend to large extent on the different beef production systems where cattle are sold length of the grazing season which is heavily influenced by off farms for further finishing on another farm or else land type and weather. Where the winter housing period is are sold direct to slaughter. extended these costs are considerably higher when compared to drier farms with longer grazing seas Our national suckler herd supplies a significant proportion of the cattle slaughtered each year but with an All of the performance data and estimates of inputs and expanding national dairy herd there is an increasing supply outputs outlined for each system is based on data of calves of dairy origin that are being finished as beef. Both generated from Teagasc research in Grange Research Centre early and late maturing beef sires are used on suckler and and Johnstown Castle. It also includes data verified in Teagasc dairy cows which also influences their age at slaughter and research demonstration herds such as the Derrypatrick herd their carcass weights. In recent years, a considerable in Grange. proportion of male beef animals are being finished as bulls Almost 90% of Irish beef production is exported. Exports at varying ages and weights. These systems are very different exceed 500,000 tonnes annually, making Ireland the largest to the traditional steer finishing systems practiced on many net exporter of beef in the EU and fourth largest in the world. farms. Nowadays, over 95% of Irish beef exports are focused on the No one beef production system is the optimum system for higher value consumer markets of the UK and continental finishing beef cattle with each having its own merits and risks. Europe. The vast majority of these exports are in the form of For any beef system to be profitable and sustainable in the boneless primal cuts. After deboning, beef cuts from an long term there are a number guidelines and targets that individual carcase are supplied to several different customers, beef farmers need to be aware of and should work towards according to market demand. Irish beef is supplied to over 85 achieving. It is also important that beef farmers focus on the EU supermarket chains, as well as major manufacturing and areas within their chosen beef system that they can improve foodservice customers, who have specific requirements with on over time instead of moving from one beef system to regard to the type of beef that they buy. With this in mind, another as a reaction to short term changes in the market. production systems need to supply prime beef which meets At the Beef Industry Roundtable Discussions chaired by the the demands of our most important markets. Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine one of the key The industry has developed a Quality Payment Scheme (QPS) actions agreed was that Teagasc and Bord Bia would produce which delivers a bonus payment on top of the quoted base a set of guidelines for beef farmers to follow when targeting a price to producers who deliver steers, heifers and young bulls particular beef system. These guidelines were to include best that meet the specifications laid out in table 1 below. It is practice around the management to achieve target daily gains, important to realise that not all the production systems an estimate of the inputs required and the outputs outlined will qualify for the QPS because animals may not achievable, an awareness of the different market meet the age, conformation, fat score or quality assurance requirements that the beef would be sold into and the risks criteria laid down at the time of slaughter. It is also the case involved, if any, associated with each system. where not all processors will pay a QPS on Under 16 month This publication outlines 14 of the most common beef systems bulls so producers should consult with their processor. It is on Irish farms at present. It includes both suckler and dairy advisable if producing animals outside of target market calf to beef systems. As the production of the suckler calf up specifications, producers should be in communication until it is weaned from the cow is quite similar this stage of with their processors. the production cycle is not covered under each system, with These system guidelines have been developed by Teagasc an assumed common weaning weight for male and female cattle specialists and beef researchers in association with calves of 320kg and 290kg liveweight, respectively. Similarly, Bord Bia beef market analysts. the first 10 to 12 weeks rearing phase of the dairy calf is not included with an assumed common weaned calf weight of IRISH PRIME BEEF CARCASE 90-100kg liveweight. Both these phases of production (for the TARGET MARKET SPECIFICATION GUIDELINES suckler calf and the dairy bred calf) are extremely STEER HEIFER YOUNG BULL important and can have a significant influence on the MUST BE QUALITY ASSURED subsequent lifetime performance of an animal. For suckler Age: U30m U30m U16m farmers selling their calves shortly after they are weaned, the Fat Score: 2+to 4= 2+to 4= 2+to 4= profitability of their system is hugely influenced by the weight Conformation: O=or better O=or better O=or better and quality of the calf that they sell due to the very high costs Farm residencies: Max. 4 Max. 4 Max. 4 of keeping the suckler cow for a year and where the majority Days on last 70 days + 70 days + 70 days + of their output is the value of the calf each cow rears. The cost QA farm: WWW.TEAGASC.IE 3 BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEM GUIDELINES UNDER 16 MONTH BULL BEEF (SUCKLER) 1. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION (HIGH CONCENTRATE) • Production of young bulls from the suckler herd which are slaughtered before they reach 16 months of age. • These young bulls are acceptable to customers in the UK market. • They demonstrate high levels of feed conversion efficiency as part of a high output system. 2. TYPICAL LIVEWEIGHTS AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF PRODUCTION STAGE OF PRODUCTION LIVEWEIGHT AVERAGE DAILY GAIN (KG) (KG/DAY) Weaning (Start Weight) 320 1.33 Housing 350 1.20 Slaughter 700 1.50 Carcase Weight (kg) 380-420 3. MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES • Calves selected for this system should have performed well pre weaning achieving 1.25kg/day or better from birth. • Animals will need to achieve a lifetime gain of around 1.35kg/day from birth to slaughter. • Animals should be from genetically superior sires that demonstrate high growth potential, good conformation and are easy fleshing to achieve an adequate fat cover by slaughter. • On suckler farms finishing their own bulls the system is best suited where the herd is achieving a compact calving over a 10-12 week period. • Calves are introduced to 2-3 kg of concentrates at grass between weaning and housing. Concentrates are built up to average 5kg/day after housing and then on to ad-lib meals for the final 120 day finishing period. • A good herd health programme is required for this intensive system as animals cannot afford any setbacks or store period if they are to achieve the targets set out. • As animals will be housed for 8-9 months in this system good housing facilities will be required with adequate lying space, clean drinking water and good ventilation. 4. INPUTS REQUIRED Concentrates 1.39t DM or 1.6t fresh weight. Silage 0.56t DM or 2.8 t fresh weight. Stocking Rate 8.4 animals/ha at 170kg organic N per ha 4 WWW.TEAGASC.IE BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEM GUIDELINES UNDER 16 MONTH BULL BEEF (SUCKLER) 5. ECONOMICS € a. Weaned Calf Purchase Value 320 kg b. Carcase Value 400 kg c. Sales – Purchases (B –A) Variable Costs per Head* Grass - Concentrates 1.6 tonnes Silage 2.8 tonnes €84 Veterinary - €35 Transport & Levies - €40 d. Total Variable Costs Gross Margin per Head (C – D) ** * Variable costs per head do not include interest or mortality costs. ** Subtract estimated fixed costs per head to calculate net margin per head. 6. MARKET CONSIDERATIONS • In order to meet the desired customer specification young bulls must be less than 16 months of age at slaughter.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bull Nutrition and Management
    BULL NUTRITION AND MANAGEMENT Stephen Boyles Ohio State University GROWING OUT YOUNG BULLS Young bulls should attain 1/2 their mature body weight by 14-15 months of age. Extremely low levels of energy intake early in life delays the onset of puberty. Feeding excess energy may reduce both semen quality and serving capacity. This is thought to be due to excess fat deposition in the scrotum, insulating the testes and increasing testicular temperature. HOW MUCH GAIN IS ENOUGH? Debates continue with regards to grain-based tests versus pasture based tests. It is felt by some producers that bulls that do well on forage will relay this performance to their off-spring. The alternative argument for grain-based test programs is that we determine their maximum genetic potential for gain. For example, suppose a breeder has one bull that gained 3 pounds per day and another gained only 1.8 pounds a day on the same diet. Rate of gain in the feedlot is about 50% heritable (Massey, 1988). The difference in rate of gain between the bulls is 1.2 pounds. Multiply the 1.2 by the 50% heritability and the result is .6 pounds per day. Since 1/2 the inheritance comes from the dam and 1/2 from the bull, divide 0.6 by 2, which gives 0.3 pounds. Thus calves sired by the bull that gained 3 pounds a day should gain .3 pound more daily than calves sired by the bull that gained only 1.8 pounds a day (if bulls bred to same herd of cows).
    [Show full text]
  • Bighorn Sheep, Moose, Mountain Goat Special Permits – Briefing and Public Hearing
    Bighorn Sheep, Moose, Mountain Goat Special Permits – Briefing and Public Hearing WAC 220-412-070 Big game and wild turkey auction, raffle, and special incentive permits. WAC 220-412-080 Special hunting season permits. WAC 220-415-070 2021 Moose seasons, permit quotas, and areas. WAC 220-415-120 2021 Bighorn sheep seasons, permit quotas, and areas. WAC 220-415-130 2021 Mountain goat seasons, permit quotas, and areas. TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary Sheet ..............................................................................................................................................1 WAC 220-412-070 Big game and wild turkey auction, raffle, and special incentive permits .....................3 Summary of Written Comment ...................................................................................................................10 WAC 220-412-080 Special hunting season permits. ..................................................................................12 Summary of Written Comment ...................................................................................................................15 WAC 220-415-070 2021 Moose seasons, permit quotas, and areas. ..........................................................17 Summary of Written Comments ..................................................................................................................20 WAC 220-415-120 2021 Bighorn sheep seasons, permit quotas, and areas. ..................................... ........22 Recommended Adjustments ........................................................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • Aurochs Genetics, a Cornerstone of European Biodiversity
    Aurochs genetics, a cornerstone of European biodiversity Picture: Manolo Uno (c) Staffan Widstrand Authors: • drs. Ronald Goderie (Taurus Foundation); • dr. Johannes A. Lenstra (Utrecht University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine); • Maulik Upadhyay (pHD Wageningen University); • dr. Richard Crooijmans (Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University); • ir. Leo Linnartz (Ark Nature) Summary of: Aurochs Genetics, a cornerstone of biodiversity Preface In 2015 a report is written on Aurochs genetics, made possible by a grant from the Dutch Liberty Wildlife fund. This fund provided the Taurus foundation with a grant of EUR 20.000 to conduct genetic research on aurochs and its relation with nowadays so- called ‘primitive’ breeds. This is the summary of that report. This summary shortly describes the current state of affairs, what we do know early 2015 about the aurochs, about domestic cattle and the relationship of aurochs and the primitive breeds used in the Tauros Programme. Nijmegen, December 2015. page 2 Summary of: Aurochs Genetics, a cornerstone of biodiversity Table of contents Preface 2 Table of contents ......................................................................................................... 3 Summary ..................................................................................................................... 4 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 6 2 Aurochs: a short description .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • What Should Be Considered in Bull Selection
    W 333 What Should be Considered in Bull Selection F. David Kirkpatrick, Professor, Animal Science directional changes in economically important traits. If the color of the offspring is an important factor, you need to understand the inheritance of color in cattle and how the consequences of the breed you select will affect market demand. Do I save replacement heifers? If heifers are to be retained from within the Selecting sires is an important decision that herd, then producers should consider the producers make in cow-calf operations. In a bull’s EPD for milk. A bull that has a milk single sire herd, the bull is responsible for EPD that is below his breed’s average will one-half of the genetics of the entire calf most likely sire daughters that do not have a crop. The last three sires used in the propensity for excellent milk production. If operation will represent almost 87 percent of feed resources are limited in a beef the genetic makeup of a calf crop in a herd operation, selecting a bull that has a milk where replacement heifers are retained. One EPD that is extremely above the average of of the first requirements before selecting a his breed could drastically affect the future new herd sire is to determine your herd’s reproduction of his daughters. present level of production and decide what traits need improvement. Higher levels of milk production require higher levels of feed resources in order to What breed do I need? retain a high reproductive rate. Consequently, selecting and using a bull that Producers can make their selections from a has a milk EPD that is extremely below the wide variety of breeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Beef Bulls
    DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE RESEARCH & EXTENSION University of Arkansas System Agriculture and Natural Resources FSA3091 Developing Beef Bulls ❚ Keep costs to a reasonable level Shane Gadberry, Ph.D. Introduction without cutting corners. Associate Professor ­ Developing beef bulls can be both ❚ Develop forage and feed programs Animal Science challenging and rewarding. Sale of that meet nutritional needs for breeding age bulls is often a signifi­ target weight gains. Jeremy Powell, cant source of revenue for seedstock ❚ Plan for bulls to be well­grown with­ DVM, Ph.D. producers. A comprehensive bull out excess condition as yearlings. development program addresses selec­ Professor ❚ Have bulls physically fit so they will tion and breeding strategies that will be active breeders. target the type of bull that fits pro­ ❚ Implement a well­designed herd duction and marketing conditions. health program. Nutrition, health and management strategies are also important compo­ Goals for a bull development nents of bull development programs. program may differ from one opera­ It is important from a profitability tion to the next depending on produc­ standpoint to keep development costs tion and marketing conditions and at acceptable levels while maintaining personal preferences. Goals may also an effective development program. change over time. Regular program The product of a successful develop­ evaluation can reveal areas where ment program is healthy, well­grown goals may need to be modified to bulls that are ready to serve as effective herd sires. enhance program direction. Goals for a Bull Selection of Bulls for Development Program Development A good bull development program Selection of bulls for a develop­ starts with good planning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Water Buffalo: Domestic Anima of the Future
    The Water Buffalo: Domestic Anima © CopyrightAmerican Association o fBovine Practitioners; open access distribution. of the Future W. Ross Cockrill, D.V.M., F.R.C.V.S., Consultant, Animal Production, Protection & Health, Food and Agriculture Organization Rome, Italy Summary to produce the cattalo, or beefalo, a heavy meat- The water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) is a type animal for which widely publicized claims neglected bovine animal with a notable and so far have been made. The water buffalo has never been unexploited potential, especially for meat and shown to produce offspring either fertile or sterile milk production. World buffalo stocks, which at when mated with cattle, although under suitable present total 150 million in some 40 countries, are conditions a bull will serve female buffaloes, while increasing steadily. a male buffalo will mount cows. It is important that national stocks should be There are about 150 million water buffaloes in the upgraded by selective breeding allied to improved world compared to a cattle population of around 1,- management and nutrition but, from the stand­ 165 million. This is a significant figure, especially point of increased production and the full realiza­ when it is considered that the majority of buffaloes tion of potential, it is equally important that are productive in terms of milk, work and meat, or crossbreeding should be carried out extensively any two of these outputs, whereas a high proportion of especially in association with schemes to increase the world’s cattle is economically useless. and improve buffalo meat production. In the majority of buffalo-owning countries, and in Meat from buffaloes which are reared and fed all those in which buffaloes make an important con­ for early slaughter is of excellent quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Considerations for Selecting a Bull1 Martha Thomas and Matt Hersom2
    AN218 Considerations for Selecting a Bull1 Martha Thomas and Matt Hersom2 Introduction particularly hind legs, are critical for a long service life of the bull. Limited land resources are increasingly putting pressure on beef cattle producers to optimize and even maximize 2. Performance Records/Pedigree production on a given land resource. Because of limited land access, many cattle ranches are deciding to produce If the bull is purchased through a bull test sale, how well did terminal calves and buy pregnant replacement heifers to he perform? What is the performance or record of the bull’s maintain the cow herd. As a result of this decision, produc- siblings or half-siblings? This information can be gathered ers need to consider utilizing bulls that will produce calves by examining his pedigree. that will meet industry carcass standards. Opportunities to capture increased value and revenue may be missed if beef 3. Expected Progeny Differences cattle producers do not routinely examine their production system with an eye towards improving the uniformity and Expected Progeny Differences (EPD) predicts the differ- marketability of the calves they produce. The goal of every ences expected in performance of future progeny of two cattle rancher should be to generate a profit from their or more sires of the same breed when mated to animals of cattle, which means increasing the marketable pounds in the same genetic potential. Many cattle producers routinely the annual calf crop. use EPDs to select sires to meet their production goals. The EPD’s that should be considered most highly when Factors to Consider selecting a bull to produce terminal calves are calf growth and potential carcass traits.
    [Show full text]
  • Livestock Definitions
    ONATE Useful livestock terms Livestock are animals that are kept for production or lifestyle, such as cattle, sheep, pigs, goats, horses or poultry. General terms for all livestock types Dam – female parent Sire – male parent Entire – a male animal that has not been castrated and is capable of breeding Weaning – the process of separation of young animals from their mothers when they are no longer dependent upon them for survival Cattle Cattle are mainly farmed for meat and milk. Bovine – refers to cattle or buffalo Cow – a female bovine that has had a calf, or is more than three years old Bull – an entire male bovine Calf – a young bovine from birth to weaning (six–nine months old) o Bull calf – a male calf o Heifer calf – a female calf Steer – a castrated male bovine more than one year old Heifer – a female bovine that has not had a calf, or is aged between six months and three years old Calving – giving birth Herd – a group of cattle Sheep Sheep are farmed for meat and fibre (wool) and sometimes milk. Ovine – refers to sheep Ram – entire male sheep that is more than one year old Ewe – a female sheep more than one year old Lamb – a young sheep less than one year old NOTE – When referring to meat, lamb is meat from a sheep that is 12–14 months old or less o Ewe lamb – is a female sheep less than one year old o Ram lamb – is a male sheep less than one year old Weaner – a lamb that has been recently weaned from its mother Hogget – a young sheep before it reaches sexual maturity – aged between nine months and one year Wether – a castrated male sheep Lambing – giving birth Flock / Mob – a group of sheep AgLinkEd Education Initiative – Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia Email: [email protected] Website: agric.wa.gov.au/education Pigs Pigs are mainly farmed for meat.
    [Show full text]
  • How Prejudice Affects the Study of Animal Minds by Ashley Elizabeth Keefner
    How Prejudice Affects the Study of Animal Minds by Ashley Elizabeth Keefner A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2017 © Ashley Elizabeth Keefner 2017 Examining Committee Membership The following served on the Examining Committee for this thesis. The decision of the Examining Committee is by majority vote. Supervisor Dr. Paul Thagard, Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, University of Waterloo Internal Member Dr. John Turri, Canada Research Chair in Philosophy & Cognitive Science, Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Waterloo Internal Member Dr. Katy Fulfer, Assistant Professor of Philosophy, University of Waterloo Internal-External Member Dr. Alice Kuzniar, University Research Chair, Professor of German and English, University of Waterloo External Examiner Dr. Andrew Fenton, Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Dalhousie University ii Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. iii Abstract Humans share the planet with many wonderfully diverse animal species and human- animal interactions are part of our daily lives. An important part of understanding how humans do and should interact with other animals is understanding how humans think about other animals. In this thesis, I argue that how humans think about the minds of other animals is marked by prejudice and that this prejudice fosters epistemological, metaphysical, and ethical problems related to study of, the conception of, and the conclusions we draw about animal minds.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Terminology Cattle Cattle
    Animal Terminology Cattle Cattle • Bovine – Scientific name • Bull – uncastrated male beef/dairy animal. • Steer – castrated male beef/dairy animal. • Heifer – female beef/dairy animal that has not had a calf. (Usually less than 18-24 months of age) • Cow – female beef/dairy animal that has had a calf. • Calf – young beef/dairy animal either male or female. • Bull Calf – Young male • Heifer Calf – Young Female • Calving – The act of parturition in cattle. • Gestation Length – 282 Days or 9 months Swine Swine • Porcine – Scientific name • Boar – uncastrated male swine. • Barrow – castrated male swine. • Gilt – female swine that has not had a litter. • Sow – female swine that has had a litter. • Pig – young swine. • Piglet -- Newborn • Farrowing – Act of parturition in swine. • Gestation Length – 114 days – 3 months, 3 weeks, 3 days Sheep Sheep • Ovine – Scientific name • Ram – uncastrated male sheep. • Wether – castrated male sheep. • Ewe – female sheep. • Ram Lamb – Young male • Ewe Lamb – Young Female • Newborn – Lamb. • Lambing – Act of parturition in sheep. • Gestation Length – 150 days Goats Goats • Caprine – Scientific name • Billy – Uncastrated male goat. • Wether – Castrated male goat. • Nanny – Female goat. • Kid – Young goat. • Kidding – Act of parturition in goats. • Gestation Length – 150 days Horses Horses • Equine – Scientific name • Stallion – Uncastrated male horse. • Gelding – Castrated male horse. • Mare – Female horse over 2 years of age. • Stud – Male used exclusively for breeding • Brood Mare – Female for breeding stock • Filly – Female horse less than two years of age that has not had a foal. • Foal – Newborn • Colt – General term for young horse • Foaling – Act of parturition in horses. • Gestation Length – 335 Days Chickens Chickens • Galline – Scientific name • Rooster – Uncastrated male chicken.
    [Show full text]
  • Bull Purchasing and Management
    ~DMSION OF AGRICULTURE U~ljj RESEARCH & EXTENSION Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Arkansas System FSA3072 Bull Purchasing and Management Bryan Kutz Purchase bulls from reputable Introduction s who provide records of their Instructor/Youth breeder Making informed bull purchasing herd health programs. Obtain avail- Extension Specialist - and management decisions is vital to able records and breed registration Animal Science the success of a cow-calf operation. papers from the breeder. Inquire The two main purposes of breeding about performance information such bulls are to contribute high repro- as birth weight, weaning weight, ductive performance and transmit yearling weight, average daily gain, desirable genetics to the herd. Bull weight per day of age, weight ratios, purchasing and management deci- feed efficiency, size of contemporary sions impact both calf crop and herd group, frame size and scrotal circum- genetics for many years. Bull manage- ference data from a bull test program ment can be divided into the following or carcass trait (body composition) seasons, which may vary in length information from ultrasound scan depending on the operation: pre- data. Expected progeny differences breeding or conditioning (2 months), (EPDs) may also be available from breeding season (2 to 3 months) and seedstock producers and may give an post-breeding season (7 to 8 months). indication on how a bull’s calves are expected to perform for certain indi- vidual traits relative to calves from Prior to the other bulls within the same breed. Breeding Season Visual appraisal of structural Bull Purchasing soundness and conformation is also useful in the selection process. Con- Plan ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Cattle Behaviour
    4 Cattle behaviour This chapter discusses the details of cattle behaviour (in other words, what cattle do) such as the relative importance of the five body senses, the various ways stock communicate with each other and their keepers and behavioural problems arising from clashes with their environment. The main points of this chapter • Of the five senses cattle possess, sight is the most dominant. Hearing and smell also play important roles in how cows assess their environment. • As a prey species, cattle have an inherent fear of unfamiliar objects, situations, smells, sudden movements and noises. As well they can experience fearfulness in situations where they are solitary or isolated. Understanding this is critical to managing them in a low stress manner. • Cattle are less expressive of pain and injury than humans. Therefore, behavioural indicators of pain that cattle do express are subtle. An animal experiencing pain has compromised welfare, and consequences to their health and productivity are also likely. • The presence of stereotypic behaviours indicate that a cow is in a compromised welfare state, and is feeling frustrated at the inability to behave naturally. In cattle, oral stereotypies, which relate to nutritional and foraging deficits, and ambulatory stereotypies, the result of restricted movement, are common. 05_Chapter_04.indd 37 01-12-2014 08:25:00 38 Cow Talk • The intensification of cattle housing, feeding and management contributes to behavioural problems not seen in grazing animals. Frustrations lead to some cows engaging in often repetitive and pointless (stereotyped) behaviour that can be interpreted as a reflection of reduced activity, hence restricted normal behaviour, in intensively managed housing systems.
    [Show full text]