Detailed Management Plan for Swamplovers Nature Preserve Managed by Swamplovers Foundation and Ice Age Trail Alliance Dane County, Wisconsin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Detailed Management Plan for Swamplovers Nature Preserve Managed by Swamplovers Foundation and Ice Age Trail Alliance Dane County, Wisconsin Detailed Management Plan for Swamplovers Nature Preserve Managed by Swamplovers Foundation and Ice Age Trail Alliance Dane County, Wisconsin ∳Integrated Restorations, LLC Ecological Restoration & Land Management Services Ecological Restoration & Land Management Services Compiled by: Craig A. Annen Operations Manager and Director of Research Integrated Restorations, LLC Comments provided by: Kevin Thusius Director of Land Conservation–The Ice Age Trail Alliance Graphic layout and typesetting: Daniela Annen First Edition: July 2010 Revised Edition: February 2012 This detailed management plan is supplemental to the document entitled “Management Plan for the Swamplovers Property” prepared by IATA Staff and signed into effect on January 25, 2005. This detailed management plan is complementary to the document entitled “Land Management Plan for Swamplovers, Inc.”, prepared by The University of Wisconsin‐Madison Department of Forestry on December 15, 1998, which focuses primarily on management of timber stand production for the property. Cover photo courtesy of Gary Nelson. Table of Contents Executive Summary Page 6 History of the Swamplovers Foundation Page 9 Legal Description and Location Page 14 Status of Adjacent Land Page 15 Vision Statement Page 16 Ecological Management Goals Page 19 Regional Context of the Preserve Page 20 Climate Page 20 Hydrology Page 21 Geology and Geomorphology, and Soils Page 25 Geologic History (Precambrian to Ordovician Periods) Page 26 Glaciation (Quaternary Period) Page 27 Glacial Retreat (Holocene Epoch) Page 30 Soils Page 31 Vegetation Page 37 Postglacial Vegetation History of Southwestern Wisconsin Page 37 Presettlement Vegetation of the Preserve Page 40 General Ecological Context of the Preserve and Management Summaries for Ecological Communities Page 42 Descriptions of Communities Page 44 Prairie Page 47 Summary of Ecological Management Goals Page 56 Management Recommendations Page 57 Sedge Meadow Page 64 Summary of Ecological Management Goals Page 69 Management Recommendations Page 70 Oak Savanna (Oak Opening) and Open Oak Woodland Page 74 Summary of Ecological Management Goals Page 82 Management Recommendations Page 83 Emergent Pond Margins and Open Water Page 89 Summary of Ecological Management Goals Page 92 Management Recommendations Page 93 Mesic Forest Page 96 References Page 99 Appendix A – Species Lists A – 0: Summary of species richness Page 103 A – 1: Total species richness Page 104 A – 2: Species of conservation concern Page 129 A – 3: Species richness and floristic quality (unit 1) Page 135 A – 4: Species richness and floristic quality (unit 7) Page 139 A – 5: Species richness and floristic quality (unit 20) Page 141 A – 6: Planting list for management unit 31 Page 144 A – 7: Planting list for management unit 13 Page 146 A – 8: Planting list for management units 2 and 3 Page 148 Appendix B – Specific Recovery Plans for Plant Species of Conservation Concern B – 1: Yellow hyssop Page 150 B – 2: Purple milkweed Page 154 B – 3: Tuberous Indian plantain Page 155 B – 4: Clustered poppy mallow Page 157 B – 5: Pale purple coneflower Page 159 B – 6: Cream gentian Page 161 B – 7: Butternut Page 163 B – 8: Glade mallow Page 165 B – 9: Marbleseed Page 166 B – 10: Wild quinine Page 168 B – 11: Prairie turnip Page 170 B – 12: Eastern prairie fringed orchid Page 172 B – 13: Casey’s ladies tresses Page 175 Appendix C – General Management Recommendations for Avian and Herpetofauna Species of Conservation Concern C – 1: Grassland and migratory birds Page 176 C – 2: Herpetofauna Page 177 Appendix D: Management Units of the Preserve Page 178 Appendix E: Soils Map of the Preserve Page 180 Appendix F: Autumn Transplanting of Federally‐Endangered Eastern Prairie Fringed Orchid Page 181 Executive Summary The Detailed Management Plan for the Swamplovers Nature Preserve was prepared as a supplement to the document “Management Plan for the Swamplovers Property” (a perpetual management plan for the property) prepared by IATA Staff and the Swamplovers Board of Directors and signed into effect on January 25, 2005. This detailed supplemental plan is subservient to the property’s perpetual management plan should any conflicts arise between the two documents. The overall purpose of this management plan was to develop and record long‐ term ecological and land‐use management goals for the Swamplovers/Ice Age Trail Alliance Nature Preserve (for brevity, hereafter referred to as the SL/IATA Preserve or simply ‘the Preserve’). The current draft of this plan provides a baseline for an adaptive ecological management approach to accomplish those goals in accordance with the vision statement of the Swamplovers Foundation Board of Directors. Future renditions of this document shall contain management goals and strategies for recreation and education on the Preserve, to be prepared by IATA staff. The first edition of this supplementary Detailed Management Plan was developed by Integrated Restorations, LLC, the Swamplovers Foundation, Inc., and Ice Age Trail Alliance during the months of May 2009 through July 2010. The second edition was updated by Integrated Restorations, LLC in February 2012. To accommodate changing management needs and midcourse corrections necessary to achieve long‐term management goals, and to update species lists and management recommendations for species of conservation concern, this 6 document should be revisited and revised/updated at two‐year intervals. Subsequent revisions should also document in detail the history of restoration and management activities completed up to that date at the SL/IATA Preserve. Data updates and detailed site history descriptions will provide a permanent record of habitat enhancement histories at the Preserve for use by future land managers and consultants. This detailed history will provide baseline data to guide future land management initiatives and will record the accomplishments (and setbacks) observed after the implementation of various restoration techniques and practices. This supplementary document provides detailed geological and ecological descriptions of the SL/IATA Nature Preserve and the surrounding landscape, long‐ term ecological management goals, a summary of species richness that has been documented at the Preserve (consolidated from all existing species inventory, research, and management projects from the inception of the Swamplovers Foundation as a Sub S corporation through January 2012), brief overviews of the management history of some of the Preserve’s various habitat units, and detailed management recommendations for many of the Preserve’s species of conservation concern. It is the intention of the Swamplovers and IATA that future land managers, consultants, and site stewards of this property utilize this document (or any subsequent revisions), along with the perpetual management plan when prioritizing and conducting future management initiatives at the Preserve. 7 Swamplovers’ Foundation: ________________________________ _________________ Gerald R. Goth, President date ________________________________ _________________ H. Lee Swanson, Vice‐President & Treasurer date ________________________________ _________________ Tom Kuehn, Secretary date Ice Age Trail Alliance: ________________________________ _________________ Kevin Thusius, Director of Land Conservation date ________________________________ _________________ Michael G. Wollmer, Executive Director date 8 History of the Swamplovers Foundation Contributed by H. Lee Swanson and Gerald R. Goth In the mid‐1980s, Joe Kuehn and H. Lee Swanson were interested in the purchase of approximately 600 acres of land (Sections 27, 28, 33, and 34 in T8N R7E of Dane County) from the von Rutenbergs of the Mariner’s Inn [Restaurant] fame. Joe received a telephone call from the von Rutenbergs in spring 1987 that they were willing to sell the property on County Highway KP. Following a couple of months of negotiations, the sale was closed on August 5, 1987 with a purchase price of $380,000. Contemporaneously with the purchase, a Sub S corporation was formed called Swamplovers, Inc. with five shareholders (Joe Kuehn, Lee Swanson, Tom Kuehn, Gerry Goth and Jim Kuehn). Joe Kuehn coined the name “Swamplovers” in jest to reflect the belief by the group that local people would think they were crazy for buying a parcel of “unproductive swamp land”. Jim Kuehn was only a partner for a short time. The property had been completely plotted for development by the von Rutenbergs. That, however, was never the intent of the Swamplovers group, who initially saw the property as a hunting and recreational opportunity. In early 1988 Swamplovers decided to sell four lots on the east side of Highway KP totaling approximately 141 acres. These sales left 460 acres on the west side of KP in possession of the Swamplovers Sub S Corporation. The farmland in the east and west valleys were rented to local farmers Gerald Kerl and LaVerne Marten and was initially entered into the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) in 9 1988. A forest management plan was prepared by the UW‐Madison Forestry Department in 1998, and in 2002 the west ridge was put into the Forest Crop Protection Program. Swamplovers pursued several select logging operations over the next few years. The effort led to more attention to the woods as a resource to improve by removing invasives such as buckthorn, garlic mustard and honeysuckle. In concert with Steve Holaday of the DNR, several Timber Stand Improvement (TSI) projects were undertaken with grants (and cost sharing from
Recommended publications
  • Bon Echo Provincial Park
    BON ECHO PROVINCIAL PARK One Malaise trap was deployed at Bon Echo Provincial Park in 2014 (44.89405, -77.19691 278m ASL; Figure 1). This trap collected arthropods for twenty weeks from May 7 – September 24, 2014. All 10 Malaise trap samples were processed; every other sample was analyzed using the individual specimen protocol while the second half was analyzed via bulk analysis. A total of 2559 BINs were obtained. Over half the BINs captured were flies (Diptera), followed by bees, ants and wasps (Hymenoptera), moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera), and beetles (Coleoptera; Figure 2). In total, 547 arthropod species were named, representing 22.9% of the BINs from the site (Appendix 1). All BINs were assigned at least to Figure 1. Malaise trap deployed at Bon Echo family, and 57.2% were assigned to a genus (Appendix Provincial Park in 2014. 2). Specimens collected from Bon Echo represent 223 different families and 651 genera. Diptera Hymenoptera Lepidoptera Coleoptera Hemiptera Mesostigmata Trombidiformes Psocodea Sarcoptiformes Trichoptera Araneae Entomobryomorpha Symphypleona Thysanoptera Neuroptera Opiliones Mecoptera Orthoptera Plecoptera Julida Odonata Stylommatophora Figure 2. Taxonomy breakdown of BINs captured in the Malaise trap at Bon Echo. APPENDIX 1. TAXONOMY REPORT Class Order Family Genus Species Arachnida Araneae Clubionidae Clubiona Clubiona obesa Linyphiidae Ceraticelus Ceraticelus atriceps Neriene Neriene radiata Philodromidae Philodromus Salticidae Pelegrina Pelegrina proterva Tetragnathidae Tetragnatha Tetragnatha shoshone
    [Show full text]
  • SYSTEMATICS of the MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of T
    SYSTEMATICS OF THE MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sibyl Rae Bucheli, M.S. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. John W. Wenzel, Advisor Dr. Daniel Herms Dr. Hans Klompen _________________________________ Dr. Steven C. Passoa Advisor Graduate Program in Entomology ABSTRACT The phylogenetics, systematics, taxonomy, and biology of Gelechioidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera) are investigated. This superfamily is probably the second largest in all of Lepidoptera, and it remains one of the least well known. Taxonomy of Gelechioidea has been unstable historically, and definitions vary at the family and subfamily levels. In Chapters Two and Three, I review the taxonomy of Gelechioidea and characters that have been important, with attention to what characters or terms were used by different authors. I revise the coding of characters that are already in the literature, and provide new data as well. Chapter Four provides the first phylogenetic analysis of Gelechioidea to include molecular data. I combine novel DNA sequence data from Cytochrome oxidase I and II with morphological matrices for exemplar species. The results challenge current concepts of Gelechioidea, suggesting that traditional morphological characters that have united taxa may not be homologous structures and are in need of further investigation. Resolution of this problem will require more detailed analysis and more thorough characterization of certain lineages. To begin this task, I conduct in Chapter Five an in- depth study of morphological evolution, host-plant selection, and geographical distribution of a medium-sized genus Depressaria Haworth (Depressariinae), larvae of ii which generally feed on plants in the families Asteraceae and Apiaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Appendix 3. Thousand Islands National Park Taxonomy Report
    Appendix 3. Thousand Islands National Park Taxonomy Report Class Order Family Genus Species Arachnida Araneae Agelenidae Agelenopsis Agelenopsis potteri Agelenopsis utahana Anyphaenidae Anyphaena Anyphaena celer Hibana Hibana gracilis Araneidae Araneus Araneus bicentenarius Larinioides Larinioides cornutus Larinioides patagiatus Clubionidae Clubiona Clubiona abboti Clubiona bishopi Clubiona canadensis Clubiona kastoni Clubiona obesa Clubiona pygmaea Elaver Elaver excepta Corinnidae Castianeira Castianeira cingulata Phrurolithus Phrurolithus festivus Dictynidae Emblyna Emblyna cruciata Emblyna sublata Eutichuridae Strotarchus Strotarchus piscatorius Gnaphosidae Herpyllus Herpyllus ecclesiasticus Zelotes Zelotes hentzi Linyphiidae Ceraticelus Ceraticelus atriceps 1 Collinsia Collinsia plumosa Erigone Erigone atra Hypselistes Hypselistes florens Microlinyphia Microlinyphia mandibulata Neriene Neriene radiata Soulgas Soulgas corticarius Spirembolus Lycosidae Pardosa Pardosa milvina Pardosa moesta Piratula Piratula canadensis Mimetidae Mimetus Mimetus notius Philodromidae Philodromus Philodromus peninsulanus Philodromus rufus vibrans Philodromus validus Philodromus vulgaris Thanatus Thanatus striatus Phrurolithidae Phrurotimpus Phrurotimpus borealis Pisauridae Dolomedes Dolomedes tenebrosus Dolomedes triton Pisaurina Pisaurina mira Salticidae Eris Eris militaris Hentzia Hentzia mitrata Naphrys Naphrys pulex Pelegrina Pelegrina proterva Tetragnathidae Tetragnatha 2 Tetragnatha caudata Tetragnatha shoshone Tetragnatha straminea Tetragnatha viridis
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2
    Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) by Boris C. Kondratieff, Paul A. Opler, Matthew C. Garhart, and Jason P. Schmidt C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 March 15, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration (top to bottom): Widow Skimmer (Libellula luctuosa) [photo ©Robert Behrstock], Stonefly (Perlesta species) [photo © David H. Funk, White- lined Sphinx (Hyles lineata) [photo © Matthew C. Garhart] ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Copyrighted 2004 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………….…1 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………..…………………………………………….…3 OBJECTIVE………………………………………………………………………………………….………5 Site Descriptions………………………………………….. METHODS AND MATERIALS…………………………………………………………………………….5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION………………………………………………………………………..…...11 Dragonflies………………………………………………………………………………….……..11
    [Show full text]
  • Hawk Moths of North America Is Richly Illustrated with Larval Images and Contains an Abundance of Life History Information
    08 caterpillars EUSA/pp244-273 3/9/05 6:37 PM Page 244 244 TULIP-TREE MOTH CECROPIA MOTH 245 Callosamia angulifera Hyalophora cecropia RECOGNITION Frosted green with shiny yellow, orange, and blue knobs over top and sides of body. RECOGNITION Much like preceding but paler or Dorsal knobs on T2, T3, and A1 somewhat globular and waxier in color with pale stripe running below set with black spinules. Paired knobs on A2–A7 more spiracles on A1–A10 and black dots on abdomen cylindrical, yellow; knob over A8 unpaired and rounded. lacking contrasting pale rings. Yellow abdominal Larva to 10cm. Caterpillars of larch-feeding Columbia tubercle over A8 short, less than twice as high as broad. Silkmoth (Hyalophora columbia) have yellow-white to Larva to 6cm. Sweetbay Silkmoth (Callosamia securifera) yellow-pink instead of bright yellow knobs over dorsum similar in appearance but a specialist on sweet bay. Its of abdomen and knobs along sides tend to be more white than blue (as in Cecropia) and are yellow abdominal tubercle over A8 is nearly three times as set in black bases (see page 246). long as wide and the red knobs over thorax are cylindrical (see page 246). OCCURRENCE Urban and suburban yards and lots, orchards, fencerows, woodlands, OCCURRENCE Woodlands and forests from Michigan, southern Ontario, and and forests from Canada south to Florida and central Texas. One generation with mature Massachusetts to northern Florida and Mississippi. One principal generation northward; caterpillars from late June through August over most of range. two broods in South with mature caterpillars from early June onward.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of Dorchester County, Maryland, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Rearing of Agonopterix Alstroemeriana, the Defoliating
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Diposit Digital de Documents de la UAB PHYSIOLOGICAL ECOLOGY Laboratory Rearing of Agonopterix alstroemeriana, the Defoliating Poison Hemlock (Conium maculatum L.) Moth, and Effects of Piperidine Alkaloids on Preference and Performance 1 EVA CASTELLS AND MAY R. BERENBAUM Department of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 320 Morrill Hall, 505 S Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801 Environ. Entomol. 35(3): 607Ð615 (2006) ABSTRACT Conium maculatum L. (Apiaceae), or poison hemlock, is an invasive plant native to Europe that has become extensively naturalized throughout North America. This species contains piperidine alkaloids, including coniine and ␥-coniceine, that are highly toxic to vertebrates. C. maculatum was relatively free from herbivores in North America until the accidental introduction 30 yr ago of its monophagous European associate Agonopterix alstroemeriana (Clerck) (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae). At present, A. alstroemeriana is widespread across the United States, and in some areas, such as the Northwest, can inßict substantial damage on its host plant, leading to desiccation and death. A. alstroemeriana has been used in recent years for the biological control of C. maculatum, although its use has been limited by the availability of larvae, which are Þeld-collected from early to mid-spring, and by the lack of available information about its life history and feeding habits. Here we describe a laboratory-rearing protocol incorporating a simulated winter to induce diapause and a semideÞned artiÞcial diet that allows the production of multiple generations per year and enabled us to determine the number and duration of A.
    [Show full text]
  • Perennial Grain Legume Domestication Phase I: Criteria for Candidate Species Selection
    sustainability Review Perennial Grain Legume Domestication Phase I: Criteria for Candidate Species Selection Brandon Schlautman 1,2,* ID , Spencer Barriball 1, Claudia Ciotir 2,3, Sterling Herron 2,3 and Allison J. Miller 2,3 1 The Land Institute, 2440 E. Water Well Rd., Salina, KS 67401, USA; [email protected] 2 Saint Louis University Department of Biology, 1008 Spring Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; [email protected] (C.C.); [email protected] (S.H.); [email protected] (A.J.M.) 3 Missouri Botanical Garden, 4500 Shaw Blvd. St. Louis, MO 63110, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-785-823-5376 Received: 12 February 2018; Accepted: 4 March 2018; Published: 7 March 2018 Abstract: Annual cereal and legume grain production is dependent on inorganic nitrogen (N) and other fertilizers inputs to resupply nutrients lost as harvested grain, via soil erosion/runoff, and by other natural or anthropogenic causes. Temperate-adapted perennial grain legumes, though currently non-existent, might be uniquely situated as crop plants able to provide relief from reliance on synthetic nitrogen while supplying stable yields of highly nutritious seeds in low-input agricultural ecosystems. As such, perennial grain legume breeding and domestication programs are being initiated at The Land Institute (Salina, KS, USA) and elsewhere. This review aims to facilitate the development of those programs by providing criteria for evaluating potential species and in choosing candidates most likely to be domesticated and adopted as herbaceous, perennial, temperate-adapted grain legumes. We outline specific morphological and ecophysiological traits that may influence each candidate’s agronomic potential, the quality of its seeds and the ecosystem services it can provide.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitive and Rare Plant Species Inventory in the Salt River and Wyoming Ranges, Bridger-Teton National Forest
    Sensitive and Rare Plant Species Inventory in the Salt River and Wyoming Ranges, Bridger-Teton National Forest Prepared for Bridger-Teton National Forest P.O. Box 1888 Jackson, WY 83001 by Bonnie Heidel Wyoming Natural Diversity Database University of Wyoming Dept 3381, 1000 E. University Avenue University of Wyoming Laramie, WY 21 February 2012 Cooperative Agreement No. 07-CS-11040300-019 ABSTRACT Three sensitive and two other Wyoming species of concern were inventoried in the Wyoming and Salt River Ranges at over 20 locations. The results provided a significant set of trend data for Payson’s milkvetch (Astragalus paysonii), expanded the known distribution of Robbin’s milkvetch (Astragalus robbinsii var. minor), and relocated and expanded the local distributions of three calciphilic species at select sites as a springboard for expanded surveys. Results to date are presented with the rest of species’ information for sensitive species program reference. This report is submitted as an interim report representing the format of a final report. Tentative priorities for 2012 work include new Payson’s milkvetch surveys in major recent wildfires, and expanded Rockcress draba (Draba globosa) surveys, both intended to fill key gaps in status information that contribute to maintenance of sensitive plant resources and information on the Forest. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All 2011 field surveys of Payson’s milkvetch (Astragalus paysonii) were conducted by Klara Varga. These and the rest of 2011 surveys built on the 2010 work of Hollis Marriott and the earlier work of she and Walter Fertig as lead botanists of Wyoming Natural Diversity Database. This project was initially coordinated by Faith Ryan (Bridger-Teton National Forest), with the current coordination and consultation of Gary Hanvey and Tyler Johnson.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Habitat and Bat Activity on Moth Community Composition and Seasonal Phenology Across Habitat Types
    INFLUENCE OF HABITAT AND BAT ACTIVITY ON MOTH COMMUNITY COMPOSITION AND SEASONAL PHENOLOGY ACROSS HABITAT TYPES BY MATTHEW SAFFORD THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2018 Urbana, Illinois Advisor: Assistant Professor Alexandra Harmon-Threatt, Chair and Director of Research ABSTRACT Understanding the factors that influence moth diversity and abundance is important for monitoring moth biodiversity and developing conservation strategies. Studies of moth habitat use have primarily focused on access to host plants used by specific moth species. How vegetation structure influences moth communities within and between habitats and mediates the activity of insectivorous bats is understudied. Previous research into the impact of bat activity on moths has primarily focused on interactions in a single habitat type or a single moth species of interest, leaving a large knowledge gap on how habitat structure and bat activity influence the composition of moth communities across habitat types. I conducted monthly surveys at sites in two habitat types, restoration prairie and forest. Moths were collected using black light bucket traps and identified to species. Bat echolocation calls were recorded using ultrasonic detectors and classified into phonic groups to understand how moth community responds to the presence of these predators. Plant diversity and habitat structure variables, including tree diameter at breast height, ground cover, and vegetation height were measured during summer surveys to document how differences in habitat structure between and within habitats influences moth diversity. I found that moth communities vary significantly between habitat types.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of Identified Lepidoptera Collected at Mud Lake State Nature Preserve, Williams County, Ohio
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 34 Number 2 - Fall/Winter 2001 Number 2 - Fall/ Article 3 Winter 2001 October 2001 Check List of Identified Lepidoptera Collected at Mud Lake State Nature Preserve, Williams County, Ohio Roy W. Rings Ohio State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Rings, Roy W. 2001. "Check List of Identified Lepidoptera Collected at Mud Lake State Nature Preserve, Williams County, Ohio," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 34 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol34/iss2/3 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Rings: Check List of Identified Lepidoptera Collected at Mud Lake State 2001 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 9 CHECK LIST OF IDENTIFIED LEPIDOPTERA COLLECTED AT MUD LAKE STATE NATURE PRESERVE, WILLIAMS COUNTY, OHIO Roy W, Rings 1 ABSTRACT A total of696 species ofLepidoptera is reported from the Mud Lake State Nature Preserve, Williams County, Ohio. This preserve is only a few miles from both the Indiana and Michigan state borders. The great biodiversity of moths is reflected in the bog, fen, shrub swamp, and marsh communities bor­ dering the lake. A check list of species summarizes identified collections for 1988,1992,1995 and 1996 and includes the Hodges et al (1983) species num­ bers, the scientific name, and the numbers collected by different collecting methods.
    [Show full text]