DOCSLIB.ORG

2009/04/02-Memorandum to File from Emile L. Julian on PR 51

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 April 2, 2009 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY DOCKETED 04/02/09 MEMORANDUM TO FILE FROM: Emile L. Julian /RA/ Assistant for Rulemakings and Adjudications SUBJECT: FORM COMMENTS SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON PR-51 (73FR 59547) and PR-51 (73FR 59551) During the comment collection period for the PR-51 notices pertaining to “Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation (73FR 59547) and the PR-51 notice on “Waste Confidence Decision Update” (73FR59551), 1, 990 form e-mail comments were received under the subject line “Conduct a Full Environmental Impact Statement Analysis” and 941 form e-mail comments were received under the subject line “Public Confidence in the NRC would Be Strengthened By Nuclear Waste Realism and Compliance With the National Environmental Policy Act”. Representative samples of each form e-mail are attached. Also, attached are separate lists of those who provided form e-mails. Attachments: As stated Rufemaking Comments From: Physicians for Social Responsibility [[email protected]] on behalf of Judy Treichel [email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 27,20094:02 PM To: Rulemaking Comments Subject: Conduct a full Environmental Impact Statement analysis Jan 27,2009 NRC Secretary Dear Secretary, I am writing to comment on the Nuc!ear Regulatory Commission's proposed Waste Confidence Decision and its proposed Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) with respect to temporary storage of spent fuel. Both of these proposals fail to protect public health and safety under the Atomic Energy Act or protect the environment under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The proposed Waste Confidence Decision is technically inadequate and fails to support any reasonable level of confidence that a radioactive waste repository can or will be licensed. It also violates NEPA because it is not supported by an Environmental Impact Statement ("EIS") that fully evaluates the environmental impacts of the waste streams whose creation would be authorized by the Waste Confidence Decision. An EIS must analyze the characteristics of radioactive waste generated by the nuclear fuel cycle, including spent fuel, depleted uranium tails, and Greater-Than-Class-C (GTCC) waste. An analysis should also be conducted for waste streams that would be generated from nuclear fuel cycles being pursued under the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership, the program to reprocess spent fuel. The EIS should describe current knowledge about the feasibility of disposing of each waste stream, including costs and uncertainties. The EIS must apply current scientific knowledge to evaluate the health impacts of the nuclear fuel cycle, updating the outmoded analyses and data in Table S-3 of NRC regulations. For example, the EIS should estimate the radioactive doses to the most exposed individual, who may be an infant or a woman rather than the "reference man;" it should estimate population doses to understand the full extent of health risks over time; and it should use time frames for health impact analyses that are based on the time frame of the contaminant's persistence in the environment. The EIS must address the cumulative impacts of radioactive waste generation, including the costs of adding new repositories for disposal of spent fuel, depleted uranium tails, and GTCC waste. The EIS must also be integrated with the EISs for licensing new nuclear reactors and re-licensing of existing reactors so that all environmental impacts and costs of NRC licensing actions can be examined in a single document. The EIS must also evaluate the costs of the entire nuclear fuel cycle, from uranium mining to radioactive waste disposal, and compare them to the costs of renewable sources of energy such as wind, geothermal and solar. The proposed FONSI on the environmental impacts of temporary onsite storage of spent fuel at nuclear reactors fails to account for the significant risks of catastrophic fire posed by high-density storage of 1 spent fuel. The secrecy imposed by the !\IRC with respect to the hazards of pool storage of spent fuel is completely unacceptable and unnecessary. The NRC must prepare an EIS that examines the relative costs and benefits of its proposal to continue high-density pool storage at nuclear reactor sites with the costs and benefits of combining low-density pool storage of spent fuel with dry storage. This combination of technologies would dramatically reduce the risk of catastrophic fire, without the need for the secrecy and lack of accountability that is now the most prominent feature of the NRC's program for interim spent fuel management. It is illegal for the NRC to license any new nuclear power plant or re-license any existing nuclear power plant unless and until it complies with the Atomic Energy Act and NEPA by performing the studies described above. Sincerely, Ms. Judy Treichel 3926 Bushnell Dr Unit 71 Las Vegas, NV 89103-3613 2 Received: from maiI1.nrc.gov(148.184.176.41) by TWMS01.nrc.gov (148.184.200.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.291.1; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:02:23 -0500 X-Ironport-ID: mail1 X-SBRS: 4.5 X-MID: 35147853 X-lronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-lronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjcBABg FfOlCLWdGkWdsb2JhbACUBwEBAOEJCwoHEOOoOgiOH IOTCI Ex X-lronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,334,1231131600"; d="scan'208";a="35147853" Received: from mta-poolcons.cluster2.convio.net ([66.45.103.70]) by maiI1.nrc.gov with ESMTP; 27 Jan 2009 16:02:23 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([10.0.1.62]) by mta-poolcons.cluster2.convio.net with ESMTP; 27 Jan 2009 15:02:21 -0600 Message-ID: <20767830.1233090141814.JavaMail.www@app30> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:02:21 -0600 From: Judy Treichel <[email protected]> Reply-To: Judy Treichel <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Conduct a full Environmental Impact Statement analysis MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Physicians for Social Responsibility <[email protected]> Organization: PSR: Physicians for Social Responsibility X-Gateway: poolcons XData: 101 0,9@4eeE4K@4I\11tE@wa8S5w5LBc1dSx1c X-ConvioDeliveryGroup: poolb Return-Path: [email protected] Rulemaking Comments From: Michael Mariotte [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, February 02,200910:13 AM To: Rulemaking Comments Subject: Public Confidence in the NRC Would Be Strengthened By Nuclear Waste Realism and Compliance With the National Environmental Polic Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, MD US Dear Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Re: 73 FR 197 -- 10/09/2008 Docket ID?2008?0482 and Docket ID-2008-0404 Public Confidence in the NRC Would Be Strengthened By Nuclear Waste Realism and Compliance With the National Environmental Policy Act The siting and licensing of new nuclear power reactors is a major federal action, and it is appropriate for the NRC to conduct a site-specific Environmental Impact Statement process under NEPA for each of these licensing actions. However, as NRC revisits its "Waste Confidence Decision," it is fundamental to a rational discussion that the proposed operation of additional nuclear power reactors in the USA be included, as additional reactors would necessarily result in the generation of more rcldioactive waste in the USA. The !\IRC has previously identified high-level radioactive waste generation as a gl9neric issue, therefore it is appropriate that any major federal action on radioactive waste (such as changing the Waste Confidence Decision) be considered in a generic (programmatic) NEPA proceeding. Such an inquiry must include all aspects of the nuclear fuel chain -- since the decision to site and license new nuclear power reactors trjggers not only more radioactive waste generation at nuclear power reactor sites -- it also tri~lgers new radioactive waste generation at every point in the fuel chain starting with the mining of uranium, through the many processing steps (milling, conversion, enrichment, conversion, fuel fabrication) and all the transp()rtation links in between. The impact to workers, nearby residents, communities, our environment and the consideration of alternatives to these impacts must be included in this impact analysis. For too long the true costs of our energy production have been labeled "externalities" and not factored in energy decisions. It is time that the fUll scope of the radioactive legacy of nuclear energy be included in Federal decision-making. NRC has repeatedly expressed its "confidence" in the eventual permanent "disposal" of radioactive waste -­ however the expectation that "disposal" will prevent release of this matE~rial into our environment has so far not been supported by any proposed program. The Yucca Mountain site would, according to federal agency projections, leak. The guidelines and regulations have been changed rElpeatedly to accommodate and "validate" this failure such that it is "acceptable." All the so-called "Low-Level" radioactive waste dumps dating back to the 1960's have leaked, and there is zero confidence that the existing regulations will keep any newer dump from leaking. This history of atomic waste policy does not inspire pubic confidence in the federal agencies mandated to "solve" the nuclear waste problem. Further, dry cask storage technology, upon which the Commission rests its immediate confidence, is a sorely insecure disposition for this most concentrated of dangerous wastes. Poor design, poor quality control, in some cases faulty fabrication, have created the equivalent of a rocket that cannot land. Overall lack of security and monitoring have left reactor communities extremely vulnerable, even as they are being told that the casks are a basis for "confidence." I am writing to urge nuclear waste realism: the NRC should suspend all generation of atomic waste from new sources unless and until a truly permanent program that is scientifically sound and rootled in a just and equitable siting/decision process is instituted.
Recommended publications
  • Protect the Vote and Prepare for the Presidential Transition Introduction

    Protect the Vote and Prepare for the Presidential Transition Introduction

    STATEMENT: Q4 2020 PROTECT THE VOTE AND PREPARE FOR THE PRESIDENTIAL TRANSITION INTRODUCTION A record number of Americans cast their votes in this election, and for our democracy to work, all eligible voters must have their voices heard. It’s okay for citizens of good faith to disagree strongly, but we must reject those trying to divide us - and we must commit ourselves to helping the most vulnerable among us exercise their right to vote. Before the election began, Business Forward joined America’s most respected CEOs in the Civic Alliance, a non-partisan group of businesses committed to protecting the democratic process, recognizing state and local election officials as trusted sources, and ensuring that every vote counts. The work is not quite over, but more votes have been cast for Joe Biden than any candidate in the history of our democracy: the people have spoken, and their choice is president-elect Joe Biden. Most Republican officials have called for all legal votes to be counted, but some continue attempts to shut down the process through the courts. It is fundamental to our democracy that every American’s timely vote counts – and there is no basis for legal arguments that claim otherwise. This report concludes a series of resources by Business Forward, featuring key facts, rec- ommendations, and best practices for you and your employees throughout the election process. In the months leading up to November 3rd, nearly 500,000 business leaders joined Business Forward for one or more of our trainings. 2 KEY POINTS THE VOTERS DECIDED,
  • Washington Environmental Council

    Washington Environmental Council

    NWTT Draft Supplemental EIS/OEIS Comment Date: 6/12/2019 11:58:36 AM Eastern Who are you representing? Organization / Affiliation Organization/Affiliation: Washington Environmental Council Full Name: Rein Attemann Comment: Please accept that attached comment letter signed by 2,042 members of the public. We expect that the US Navy will accept and consider these comments as 2,042 unique comments. thank you for the opportunity to comment on this Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Dear U.S. Navy, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Draft Northwest Training and Testing (NWTT) Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Draft EIS). I am specifically concerned about impacts on the Southern Resident orcas, which are at serious risk of extinction. The draft EIS, as presented, clearly identifies that the Navy’s training and testing activities will harm endangered Southern Resident orcas. The Navy must shift these activities away from locations and dates that endangered species are present. In an already noisy underwater world, orcas need quieter waters order to effectively communicate with one another, to forage for food, to nurse their young, to breed, and to migrate. More active sonar disturbance and mine explosions will harm orcas. A March 2019 report by NOAA by Emmons, Hanson, and Lemmers (see citation below) records calls from both Southern Resident and Northern Resident Killer Whales at the same locations and months as explosive noises from Navy activities. That means the Navy is already altering the soundscape in ways that are harmful to these endangered species. Any harm to orcas constitutes an illegal “take” under the Endangered Species Act.
  • 350 Reasons We Need to Get to 350

    350 Reasons We Need to Get to 350

    350 Reasons We Need to Get to 350 350 Species Threatened by Global Warming AN INTERACTIVE INSTALLATION BY THE CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY spotlighting 350 species that THE CLIMATE CRISIS threatens with extinction — 350 reasons why we must reduce carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere to 350 parts per million or less. A project marking the International Day of Climate Action, October 24, 2009, and the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, December 7-18, 2009. 350.biologicaldiversity.org 350 REASONS WE NEED TO GET TO 350: 350 SpECIES THREATENED BY GLOBAL WARMING AN INTERACTIVE INSTALLATION BY THE CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Spotlighting 350 species that the climate crisis threatens with extinction — 350 reasons why we must reduce carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere to 350 parts per million or less. A project marking the International Day of Climate Action, October 24, 2009, and the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, December 7-18, 2009. 350.Biologicaldiversity.org Compiled by the Climate Law Institute of the Center for Biological Diversity Research and Writing: Rose Braz, Shaye Wolf, Brian Nowicki, Ileene Anderson, Maria Seiferle, Cassie Holmgren, Erica Etelsen, Peter Galvin, Kierán Suckling Editing: Anna Mirocha, Lydia Millet, Julie Miller Project Design: Bill Haskins, Julie Miller, Anna Mirocha Photo Editing: Melissa Buchmann, Maria Seiferle, Julie Miller, Cassie Holmgren 350 Species Mosaic Graphic: Cassie Holmgren Project Outreach: Barbara George, Tara Cornelisse, Erica Etelson The Center for Biological Diversity thanks all the photographers who contributed species images in support of this project, as well as all of the citizen activists who submitted their own images on behalf of both human life and the other animals and plants that need us to get to 350.
  • Public Comment

    Public Comment

    To the Department of Labor: Millions of Americans are counting on their 401(k)s and retirement accounts, and many depend on investment professionals for guidance in managing these complex plans. We should be able to trust our financial advisers to put our interests first. But the current rules make it easy for unscrupulous advisers to line their own pockets at our expense. It's time to close this loophole and insist that the professionals who present themselves as honest retirement advisers actually give honest advice, instead of a sales pitch disguised as advice. It's difficult enough to save for retirement without having to contend with advisers who put their interests ahead of ours. I'm counting on you to close this loophole now. Martin Niemi James Keegan Derek Monroe Douglas, AK Anchorage, AK Anchorage, AK David Hribar Marc Dumas Dolores Farrell Palmer, AK Fairbanks, AK Sitka, AK Charlotte Jewell Jiohn S. Sonin Mary Klippel Skagway, AK Juneau, AK Eagle River, AK Carlton Russell Diana Barney Guy Liston Anchorage, AK Anchorage, AK , AK Shawn O'Donnell Jill Bohr Jacob Michael Berthelsen ANCHORAGE, AK Ketchikan, AK , AK Mary Turner Lynn Wilbur Rich Tolles Anchorage, AK Sitka, AK Haines, AK Susan Vogt Sharyle Bell Harold Robinson Fairbanks, AK Juneau, AK Talladega, AL Stephen Hunt Marilyn Lee Bruce Fowler , AL Florence, AL Arab, AL William Meneese Peter Kerr Steven Lee Birmingham, AL Madison, AL Huntsville, AL Jennifer Humiston DANIEL BUCKLEY Stacey Lovelock Huntsville, AL Andalusia, AL Madison, AL Don Hunter Diane Difante Mandy Nix Arab, AL Wetumpka, AL Birmingham, AL Kenneth Hyche Karen Rossi Brad Carnes Cullman, AL Auburn, AL Huntsville, AL James Hildebrand Sharon Drube Sharon Marsh Mobile, AL , AL Brewton, AL Daniel Williams Elaine Tindill-Rohr Karen Spradlin Birmingham, AL Birmingham, AL Jacksonville, AL George Williams Jonathan Mitchell Tim Linderman Scottsboro, AL Madison, AL Birmingham, AL Hubert Oswalt Walter B.
  • Home Rule Held False Issue in Zoning Bars Assembly Postpones

    Home Rule Held False Issue in Zoning Bars Assembly Postpones

    The Daily Register VOL. 98 NO.66 SHREWSBURY, N. J. TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 1975 15 CENTS Home rule held false issue in zoning bars (Related Stories on pages 3 and 13) might have an adverse impact on a community But the im- FREEHOLD — The exercise of home rule through zoning pact can't remain confined to cities like Camden It has to be cannot be used as an argument to exclude people from a com- shared by communities that have available space ' munity, Stewart Palilonis of the state Department of Commu- S. Thomas Gagliano. Holmdel's attorney, who was also a nity Affairs said yesterday at the annual conference of the member of the panel, had argued that "people are rebelling Monmouth County Planning Board. against the erosion of their rights to run their own lives and "Home rule was never meant to give residents the right towns The only responsive government is local government " to adversely affect others in the state," Mr Palilonis as- Earlier in the discussion. Mr Gagliano noted that elected serted. "Home rule used to exclude people is a false issue." and appointed municipal officials must deal with "tremendous Mr Palilonis was a member of a panel that discussed political considerations" when they adopt a zoning ordinance land use controls and alternatives in the light of the recent The code must reflect the feelings of the residents or there court decisions that found the zoning ordinances of Mount will be litigation, he observed Laurel and Holmdel illegal. The courts knocked down Holmdel's zoning because it did Mr Gagliano also listed nieghborhood resistance to any not provide for a variety of housing that would meet the change in zoning and financial considerations involved in up- needs and income levels of all the people who might want tn dating a Master Plan and the cost of possible legal challenges live there.
  • List of People Who Have Sent E-Mail Titled “Stop Making Radwaste; Start Taking Scientifically-Sound Decisions”

    List of People Who Have Sent E-Mail Titled “Stop Making Radwaste; Start Taking Scientifically-Sound Decisions”

    List of people who have sent E-mail titled “Stop making radwaste; start taking scientifically-sound decisions” Albert Nunez [email protected] Vincent Campanaro [email protected] Rena Lewis [email protected] 8 Sherman Ave. 4401 Spruce St 1202 Loma Dr Takoma Park, MD 20912 Philadelphia, PA 19104 Ojai, CA 93023 Dennis Feichtinger [email protected] Kevin Brown [email protected] Shari Katz [email protected] 2711 Riverside HC1 Box 628 526 Citadel Circle Trenton, MI 48183-2830 Kaunakakai, HI 96748 Westmont, IL 60559-2083 Frances Barber Mike Johnson Tia Triplett [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 4073 Bledsoe Avenue 450 Seddon Street 538 Stonemason drive Los Angeles, CA 90066 Bland, VA 24315 Myrtle Beach, SC 29579 Richard Gustafson Ingrid Erickson Betty McElhill [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 230 S. Palace Gardens Dr 8435 Kennedy Rd. 1104 E. Maryland #1 Tucson, AZ 85748 Sebastopol, CA 95472 Bellingham, WA 98226 Erik Schnabel Chris Wrinn Design Michael Stuart [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3116 Shady Dr. 229 Dore St. 56 Harborview Ave Wonder Lake, IL 60097-9318 San Francisco, CA 94103 Milford, CT 06460-6539 Roger Lippman [email protected] Charles Cunningham Irene Radke [email protected] 710 Lake Washington Blvd South [email protected] 4648 SW 38th Terr Seattle, WA 98144 1002 Rock Creek Road Dania Beach, FL 33312 Clinton, MT 59825 Elizabeth Fuerst Thomas Hall [email protected] Monika Simon-Paseka [email protected] P.O.
  • Big Berks 2020 Program

    Big Berks 2020 Program

    THE BERKSHIRE CONFERENCE ON THE HISTORY OF WOMEN, GENDERS, AND SEXUALITIES 2020 GENDERED ENVIRONMENTS: Exploring Histories of Women, Genders, and Sexualities in Social, Political and “Natural” Worlds Autobiography: “Water / Ancestors / Middle Passage / Family Ghosts” by Howardena Pindell JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY Baltimore, Maryland, May 27 – 31, 2020 THE BERKSHIRE CONFERENCE on the HISTORY OF WOMEN, GENDERS, AND SEXUALITIES 3 CO-PRESIDENTS WELCOME TO THE 18TH BERKSHIRE CONFER- ENCE OF WOMEN, GENDER AND SEXUALITIES In an extraordinary moment in time, spring 2020, we welcome you to this virtual or print version of the 18th Berkshire Conference on the History of Women, Genders, and Sexualities (known as the Big Berks), which was scheduled to be hosted by Johns Hopkins University. Titled “Gendered Environments: Exploring Histories of Women, Genders, and Sexualities in Social, Political, and ‘Natural,’ Worlds,” the conference sought to elicit productive and intersectional conversation about the en- vironmental challenge of climate change and the centennial anniversary of the 19th Amendment. We all now know firsthand what it feels like to be standing in the swirl of a historic happening. This year’s Big Berks has been like none other in that it was scheduled to take place during what turned out to be the global pandemic of COVID-19. The Berks intellectual and social community, like communities all around the world, has had to adapt to emergency, relinquish plans years in the making, and forestall wishes of convening together in one place. After extensive deliberations, the officers and trustees of the Berkshire Conference agreed that in light of the profound uncertainty and very real health risks related to COVID-19, and in light of our host university’s announcement about the suspen- sion of sponsored events until further notice, it was not possible to meet as planned.
  • U.S. DEPARTMENT of HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE of the SURGEON GENERAL in Re: Ban of Live Animal Markets Docket No. __ PETIT

    U.S. DEPARTMENT of HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE of the SURGEON GENERAL in Re: Ban of Live Animal Markets Docket No. __ PETIT

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF THE SURGEON GENERAL In re: Ban of Live Animal Markets Docket No. __ PETITION FOR RULEMAKING SUBMITTED TO VADM Jerome M. Adams, MD, MPH Office of the Surgeon General U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue SW Humphrey Building, Suite 701H Washington, DC 20201 [email protected] RESPOND TO Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine 5100 Wisconsin Avenue NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20016 [email protected] DATE April 7, 2020 INTRODUCTION Recurrent worldwide infections—seasonal influenza, SARS, MERS, and now COVID-19— cause massive mortality and economic damage. These epidemics have specific causes that have remained neglected. Poultry flocks are breeding grounds for influenza A viruses, and live animal markets are the source of coronavirus. Because these pathogens and others like them will continue to cause massive health challenges unless urgent action is taken, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) now calls for a ban on live animal markets.1 Therefore, we petition the Surgeon General to “prevent the introduction, transmission, or spread of communicable diseases”2 by prohibiting the operation of live animal markets in the United States and working with international bodies to harmonize this policy worldwide. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Influenza A is an avian virus. Beginning with the 1918 H1N1 “Spanish influenza” (if not before), all influenza A outbreaks have come originally from bird viruses that have found their way into domesticated animal populations and, from there, into farmworkers, their contacts, and the broader community. The H1N1 virus killed millions of people.
  • February 19, 2015 Marlene Dortch Secretary Federal Communications

    February 19, 2015 Marlene Dortch Secretary Federal Communications

    February 19, 2015 Marlene Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington DC 20554 Re: Notice of Ex Parte Presentation, CG Docket No. 02-278 Dear Ms. Dortch: Enclosed is a petition directed to the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) with this message, “Tell the FCC: No robocalls to cell phones without our consent.” The petition was signed by over 58,000 individuals from across the United States. The petition was initiated and circulated by the National Association of Consumer Advocates (“NACA”), National Consumer Law Center on behalf of its low-income clients (“NCLC”), Americans for Financial Reform , National Consumers League , Consumer Action, Public Citizen, U.S. PIRG, and Consumer Federation of America. Related to this petition, on January 26, 2015, we emailed a letter signed by 83 national, state and community advocacy organizations urging the FCC to keep important consumer and privacy protections for cell phone users. These organizations encourage the FCC to protect consumers and not to permit any changes in the current regulations under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act regarding the definition of autodialer or “called party,” or the liability of callers to reassigned numbers. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Ellen Taverna at NACA, [email protected] (202 452-1989, extension 109) or Margot Saunders at NCLC, [email protected] (202 452 6252, extension 104). This disclosure is made pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. Sincerely, Ellen Taverna Margot Saunders
  • No Offshore End-Run Around Derivatives Reform

    No Offshore End-Run Around Derivatives Reform

    No Offshore End-Run Around Derivatives Reform To the Commissioners of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission: We, the undersigned, urge you to stand up for rules that apply the transparency and safety requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act to all derivatives transactions relevant to U.S. markets, regardless of whether these transactions are routed through a foreign subsidiary or entity. We need rules that cover all transactions, wherever they occur, which have the potential to jeopardize America’s financial institutions and financial security. That’s how the rules must to be structured in order to work.. And that’s how Dodd-Frank was written. We call on you to uphold that standard. Exempting the transactions of overseas subsidiaries from the full scope of derivatives regulation would be a giant loophole, encouraging banks to move transactions offshore and permitting an indefinite continuation of the kind of reckless activity that helped crash the economy in 2008. Delay, too, can be a strategy for weakening and evading the law. Four years after the financial crisis and two years after the passage of Dodd Frank, it is time to insist on high standards that apply to all the derivatives transactions of U.S. banks and their subsidiaries. David Montano, Denver, CO Joan Kramer, Los Angeles, CA Lily Kirsanow, Rio Rancho, NM Molly Noone, Chandler, AZ Bradley Walker, Arlington, TX Jocelyn Davis-Beck, Beecher, IL Kevin Cox, San Francisco, CA John Flitcraft, Cambria, CA Nancy Rominger, Salisbury, NC Sandra Holt, Casselberry, FL melvin olson, flippin, AR Karen Christian, Vail, AZ Stephen Hackney, Grangeville, ID Ron Bigler, Silver Spring, MD Erika Ingato, Zionsville, PA Carla Behrens, Longmont, CO Jeni Bettjer, Descanso, CA Karin Paris, Ennis, TX Ms.
  • Business Leader Statement on President Biden's Day One Executive

    Business Leader Statement on President Biden's Day One Executive

    STATEMENT : Q1 2021 BUSINESS LEADER STATEMENT ON PRESIDENT BIDEN’S DAY ONE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS IN SUPPORT OF REVOKING THE MUSLIM TRAVEL BAN, REJOINING THE PARIS CLIMATE ACCORD, AND ESTABLISHING PANDEMIC PRECAUTIONS AND RELIEF INTRODUCTION: Business Forward helps local business leaders make the “business case” for climate action, affordable healthcare, immigration reform, diversity and inclusion, sensible tax laws, criminal justice reform, infrastructure investment, and other pro-growth reforms. These leaders brief policymakers, work with local media, publish op- eds, submit testimony, advocate online, and organize their communities. We also promote their recommendations through issue briefs, survey reports, training manuals, and podcasts. More than 650 mayors, governors, members of Congress, and senior Administration officials have participated in our briefings. We asked business leaders across our network to add their name to a statement in support of President Biden’s day one executive actions, including revoking the Muslim travel ban, rejoining the Paris Climate Accord, and establishing pandemic precautions and relief. More than 1,000 business leaders responded, and their comments are featured in this statement document. 2 STATEMENT: By signing this letter, we demonstrate business leaders’ support for President Biden’s actions that will set the United States on the path to building a more economically competitive, inclusive America, and a cleaner, healthier, more prosperous future. MORE THAN 1,000 BUSINESS LEADERS SIGNED THIS STATEMENT: A. Ollivierre, North Babylon, NY Amelia Jones, Santa Monica, CA Abbas Salim, Monroe Township, NJ Amirtha Naadimuthu, Pennington, NJ Abdul Khan, Folsom, CA Amy Berger, Bend, OR Abdul Khoshafa, Everett, MA Amy Goulston, Folsom, CA Thank you for revoking “ the Muslim ban and Abigail Algiene, Pueblo, CO Anas Lahrim, Chantilly, VA restoring America’s power Abra Shapiro, Barrington, IL Andras Heimann, Loveland, OH of example to the world.
  • Women of Vision VISIBLE EVIDENCE Edited by Michael Renov, Faye Ginsburg, and Jane Gaines Public Confidence in the "Real" Is Everywhere in Decline

    Women of Vision VISIBLE EVIDENCE Edited by Michael Renov, Faye Ginsburg, and Jane Gaines Public Confidence in the "Real" Is Everywhere in Decline

    Women of Vision VISIBLE EVIDENCE Edited by Michael Renov, Faye Ginsburg, and Jane Gaines Public confidence in the "real" is everywhere in decline. The Visible Evidence series offers a forum for the in-depth consideration of the representation of the real, with books that engage issues bearing upon questions of cultural and historical representation, and that forward the work of challenging prevailing notions of the "documentary tradition" and of nonfiction culture more generally. Volume 9 Alexandra Juhasz, editor Women of Vision: Histories in Feminist Film and Video Volume 8 Douglas Kellner and Dan Streible, editors Emile de Antonio: A Reader Volume 7 Patricia R. Zimmermann States of Emergency: Documentaries, Wars, Democracies Volume 6 Jane M. Gaines and Michael Renov, editors Collecting Visible Evidence Volume 5 Diane Waldman and Janet Walker, editors Feminism and Documentary Volume 4 Michelle Citron Home Movies and Other Necessary Fictions Volume 3 Andrea Liss Trespassing through Shadows: Memory, Photography, and the Holocaust Volume 2 Toby Miller Technologies of Truth: Cultural Citizenship and the Popular Media Volume 1 Chris Holmlund and Cynthia Fuchs, editors Between the Sheets, In the Streets: Queer, Lesbian, Gay Documentary VISIBLE EVIDENCE, VOLUME 9 Women of Vision Histories in Feminist Film and Video Alexandra Juhasz, Editor University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis London For information about the video Women of Vision, contact: The Cinema Guild, Inc. 1687 Broadway, Suite 506 New York, NY 10019-5904 (212) 246-5522 http://www.cinemaguild.com Copyright 2001 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a re- trieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.