DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix a August 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix a August 2015 Appendix A August 2015 Appendix A Bill Thompson/USFWS American Black Duck The Proposed Assateague Wilderness: Building Blocks for the Wilderness Character Monitoring Report A-1 Chincoteague and Wallops Island National Wildlife Refuges CCP/EIS Appendix A August 2015 A-2 Chincoteague and Wallops Island National Wildlife Refuges CCP/EIS Appendix A August 2015 2012 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service U.S. National Park Service Taryn Sudol Wilderness Fellow [THE PROPOSED ASSATEAGUE ISLAND WILDERNESS] Building Blocks for the Wilderness Character Monitoring Report A-3 Chincoteague and Wallops Island National Wildlife Refuges CCP/EIS Appendix A August 2015 Executive Summary The Assateague barrier island off the Maryland and Virginia mainland is managed, in part, by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as the Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge (CNWR), the U.S. National Park Service as the Assateague Island National Seashore (ASIS), and the Maryland Department of Natural Resources as Assateague State Park. Federal and state protection of this island provides a wildlife sanctuary, especially for shorebirds and migratory birds, and recreational opportunities for a high number of visitors. In response to the Wilderness Act, 1964, the entire island was reviewed to see which areas still possessed primeval characteristics. As a result, the central 6,500 acres of Assateague Island was proposed as wilderness in 1974, but has yet to receive designation. Until such a Congressional decision is made, ASIS and CNWR manage the area to preserve its wilderness character. An evaluation of the current land status will set a 2012 baseline for wilderness character and support a plan for monitoring long-term trends. An interagency team, representing the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), National Park Service (NPS), U.S. Forest Service (USFS), and Bureau of Land Management (BLM), developed a guide for wilderness character monitoring. This national strategy is described in the 2008 “Keeping It Wild: An Interagency Strategy to Monitor Trends in Wilderness Character across the national Wilderness Preservation System” publication, and will be followed herein. The purpose of this document is to describe a wilderness character monitoring program for the proposed Assateague Island wilderness. The designed 33 measures are largely consistent for both ASIS and CNWR. They were developed with ASIS and CNWR staff as well as outside USFWS and NPS guidance. They are composed of readily available data such as field surveys, management policies, documented uses, and professional judgment. First, the setting of the proposed wilderness is described, including current boundary descriptions, the island’s ecology, a legislative history and refuge and park purposes. Second, a wilderness narrative expresses what makes the proposed Island Wilderness special. Third, the process for developing these measures is explained. Fourth, the wilderness character hierarchy is expanded upon to provide context for the fifth section, the Measures. This section describes the suite of proposed measures, such as their relevance to wilderness character, how the data is collected, and 2012 data. This section also includes measures under development and those measures considered but ultimately dismissed as not functional. Lastly, concluding thoughts are given on the proposed monitoring program and continuing issues. In effect, this document provides a 2012 baseline assessment and describes the wilderness character monitoring program for the proposed Assateague Island wilderness. 2 | P a g e A-4 Chincoteague and Wallops Island National Wildlife Refuges CCP/EIS Appendix A August 2015 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Section 1. Setting of the Assateague Island Wilderness ......................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Geographic setting: Current Land Status, Boundary Description and Map .................................................................. 5 1.2 Ecological setting .......................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 History of land status, legislation, and establishing the wilderness ............................................................................. 9 1.4 Refuge and Park purposes ............................................................................................................................................ 9 1.5 Significant resources and values ................................................................................................................................. 10 Section 2. Wilderness Character Narrative ........................................................................................................................... 11 UNTRAMMELED ................................................................................................................................................................ 11 NATURAL ........................................................................................................................................................................... 13 UNDEVELOPED .................................................................................................................................................................. 14 SOLITUDE OR PRIMITIVE AND UNCONFINED RECREATION .............................................................................................. 15 OTHER FEATURES OF THE WILDERNESS............................................................................................................................ 16 Section 3. Resources and Process ......................................................................................................................................... 17 3.1 Documents Consulted ................................................................................................................................................. 17 3.2 Assateague NS and Chincoteague NWR Staff Consulted ............................................................................................ 17 3.3 Process Used For Identifying Measures ...................................................................................................................... 18 Section 4. Framework For Wilderness Character Monitoring .............................................................................................. 19 Section 5. Measurements ..................................................................................................................................................... 21 5.1 Natural ........................................................................................................................................................................ 21 5.2 Untrammeled .............................................................................................................................................................. 28 5.3 Undeveloped ............................................................................................................................................................... 31 5.4 Solitude or Primitive and Unconfined Recreation ...................................................................................................... 40 5.5 Other Features ............................................................................................................................................................ 46 5.6 Measures under Development ................................................................................................................................... 47 5.7 Measures Not Used ..................................................................................................................................................... 49 Section 6. Issues and Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................... 50 Appendix A. Wilderness Act .................................................................................................................................................. 51 Appendix B. Worksheet to Prioritize Measures .................................................................................................................... 55 Appendix C. Summary of Measures ...................................................................................................................................... 69 Appendix D. Effort ................................................................................................................................................................. 75 Appendix E. Actions –Detailed .............................................................................................................................................. 81 Appendix F. List of Authorized Developments ...................................................................................................................... 82 3 | P a g e A-5 Chincoteague and Wallops Island National Wildlife Refuges CCP/EIS Appendix A May 2014 Appendix G. Authorized motorized vehicles, mechanical transport and motorized equipment –Detailed ........................ 84 4 | P a g e A-4 Chincoteague and Wallops Island National Wildlife Refuges CCP/EIS Appendix
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2020 Weather in Review: Assateague Island National Seashore
    National Park Service Northeast Coastal and Barrier Network U.S. Department of the Interior Inventory & Monitoring Division 2020 Weather in Review: Assateague Island National Seashore Weather and climate play significant roles in driving both physical and ecological processes. For example, the active processes that shape the North Atlantic coastline are largely the result of meteorological events such as wind- driven waves. For research and long-term ecological monitoring, weather and climate data provide the potential for correlations to be made with observed physical and ecological pattern data. This resource brief provides a summary of both historic and current (2020) weather data for Assateague Island National Seashore (ASIS), Maryland (MD). Because tide levels and wind can be significant for coastal parks, the annual water level and wind data are included. Temperature Overall, 2020 was the 2nd warmest year on record with an average temperature of 59.4 °F — 3.1 degrees above average (Figure 1). Spring nearly reached “above normal” temperatures, while summer, autumn, and winter seasons fell within “much above normal” temperatures. 2020 had the 2nd warmest winter on record. The warmest month was July with an average of 81 degrees — 4.7 degrees over the monthly average. Every month had higher than average temperatures, except May at 1.4 degrees below average (Table 1). Table1. Worcester County, Maryland average monthly, average annual, and departures from long- term average temperatures. Departures from average are based on a comparison of 2020 average temperatures to relevant averages from 1895-2019. Data are available at NOAA NCEI: Climate at a Glance (https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/county/time-series/MD-047/tavg/all/12/2020-2020).
    [Show full text]
  • Island 3 SECTIONS, 36 PAGES POR Formula Food Fight Finding Foes Bj Mark S
    '.»••;• JUNE 28, 1996 VOLUME 25 NUMBER 26 island 3 SECTIONS, 36 PAGES POR Formula food fight finding foes Bj Mark S. Kr/,os Sanibel-Captiva In 1993, it was a ban ue this, I have no other make some restaurants, punishes him because liew, Niter Chamber of Commerce on drive-throughs. Now choice but to contest this such as Thompson's he's successful. Thomp- The inuem.iry sound President David Besse its the restaurant chains in a court of law. My Lazy Flamingo, non-con- son, who owns two Lazy of pounding nails into compared the ordinance themselves. back is against the wall." forming. Flamingoes on the island coffin* eihoai in the ears to a firing squad. "I love Sanibel and I In the latest chapter in "If a major storm hits and two franchises off- of some Siimbcl.restau- "Passing this -and .don' t .like-, the. pas i t ion .SanibeL's. ongoing, formu- . this _area_and. my. restau- island,, said.his. restau- rant owners Tuesday sending it to the City you're putting me in," la food fight, the city is rant is 50 percent or rants are not fast food after I he F'lanning Council would be [a] said Larry Thompson, proposing an ordinance more damaged, I'll be in and would like some lan- Gommi^ion approved an death sentence," Besse owner of the Lazy that would eliminate for- trouble," Thompson said. guage implemented in ordinaiki h.mning for- said. "The issue here is Flamingo and Tarpon mula restaurants from According to ,. •please see page 8A mula riMiiUMIlts.
    [Show full text]
  • GIS Enhances Restoration of Northern Assateague Island
    GIS Enhances Restoration of Northern Assateague Island Jane Thomas, IAN Image Library (www.ian.umces.edu/imagelibrary/) Andrew Roach ([email protected]) ESRI International Users Conference Assateague Island National Seashore National Parks Track, August 2006 Assateague Island GIS Enhances Restoration of Northern Assateague Island Assateague Island National Seashore Maryland and Virginia •Three Management GIS Enhances Agencies Restoration of Northern – National Assateague Park Service Island – Maryland Department of Natural Assateague Island Resources National Seashore –US Fish and Maryland Wildlife and Virginia Service •37 miles north/south Assateague Island GIS 1933 Hurricane: Enhances Restoration Creation of Ocean City of Northern Inlet Assateague Island Assateague Island National Seashore Maryland and Virginia Assateague Island 1962 Nor’easter: Island-Wide Devastation GIS Enhances Restoration of Northern Assateague Island Assateague Island National Seashore Maryland and Virginia Natural Processes Interrupted GIS Enhances Restoration of Northern Assateague Island Assateague Island National Seashore Maryland and Virginia Mitigation Efforts GIS Enhances Restoration of Northern Assateague Island Assateague Island National Seashore Maryland and Virginia Jane Thomas, IAN Image Library (www.ian.umces.edu/imagelibrary/) Data GIS Enhances Restoration of Northern • Shorelines Assateague Island • Cross-Island Elevation Profiles •Lidar Assateague Island • Aerial Photography National Seashore •Bathymetry Maryland • Near-shore Profiles and Virginia
    [Show full text]
  • Turning Point
    National Parks Conservation Association® Protecting Our National Parks for Future Generations® Turning Point Will we continue to protect against air pollution threats to the Habitats, Health, Heritage, and Horizons of our national parks? Or will we fail to save them for future generations? PHOTOS FROM LEFT TO RIGHT: BIG STOCK PHOTO, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, SCOTT KIRKWOOD, BIG STOCK PHOTO National Park Sites Located in Poor Air Quality Areas as Designated by the EPA (continued on inside back cover) ALABAMA San Francisco Maritime NHP Potomac Heritage NST Fort Washington Park Russell Cave NM Santa Monica Rock Creek Park Greenbelt Park Mountains NRA Theodore Roosevelt Island George Washington ARIZONA Sequoia NP Thomas Jefferson MEM Memorial PKWY Casa Grande Ruins NM Yosemite NP Vietnam Veterans MEM Hampton NHS Chiricahua NM Washington Monument Harpers Ferry NHP Coronado NMEM COLORADO White House Monocacy NB Fort Bowie NHS Rocky Mountains NP National Capital Parks Grand Canyon NP GEORGIA CONNECTICUT Piscataway Park Hohokam Pima NM Chattahoochee River NRA Appalachian NST Thomas Stone NHS Organ Pipe Cactus NM Chickamauga & Weir Farm NHS Saguaro NP Chattanooga NMP MASSACHUSETTS Tonto NM DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Kennesaw Mountain NBP Cape Cod NS Tumacacori NHP Chesapeake & Ohio Martin Luther King, Jr. NHS Adams NHP Canal NHP Ocmulgee NM Appalachian NST CALIFORNIA Carter G. Woodson NHS Boston African- Cabrillo NM INDIANA Constitution Gardens American NHS Channel Islands NP Indiana Dunes NL Franklin Delano Boston Harbor Islands NRA Death Valley NP Lincoln
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Worcester County (PDF)
    Contents Worcester’s Original Locals ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Native American Names ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 From Colony To Free State ................................................................................................................................................................. 6 A Divided Land: Civil War .................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Storm Surges & Modern Times ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Our Historic Towns .............................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Berlin ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Ocean City .................................................................................................................................................................................. 10 Ocean Pines
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Dancer
    LES 2000 GUINEES EUROPEENNES DE NORTHERN DANCER 2000 GUINEES Année Vainqueur Père Ascendants Paternels Père de Mère 1970 Nijinsky Northern Dancer Bull Page 1983 Lomond Northern Dancer Poker 1984 El Gran Senor Northern Dancer Buckpasser 1985 Shadeed Nijinsky Northern Dancer Damascus 1986 Dancing Brave Lyphard Northern Dancer Drone 1991 Mystiko Secreto Northern Dancer Zeddaan 1992 Rodrigo de Triano El Gran Senor Northern Dancer Hot Spark 1997 Entrepreneur Sadler's Wells Northern Dancer Exclusive Native 1998 King of Kings Sadler's Wells Northern Dancer Habitat 1999 Island Sands Turtle Island Fairy King Northern Dancer J O Tobin 2002 Rock of Gibraltar Danehill Danzig Northern Dancer Be My Guest 2003 Refuse to Bend Sadler's Wells Northern Dancer Gulch 2004 Haafhd Alhaarth Unfuwain Northern Dancer Blushing Groom 2005 Footstepsinthesand Giant's Causeway Storm Cat Storm Bird Rainbow Quest 2006 George Washington Danehill Danzig Northern Dancer Alysheba 2007 Cockney Rebel Val Royal Royal Academy Nijinsky Known Fact 2009 Sea The Stars Cape Cross Green Desert Danzig Miswaki 2011 Frankel Galileo Sadler's Wells Northern Dancer Danehill IRISH 2000 GUINEES Année Vainqueur Père Ascendants Paternels Père de Mère 1976 Northern Treasure Northfields Northern Dancer Kyrhnos 1981 Kings Lake Nijinsky Northern Dancer Baldric II 1984 Sadler' s Wells Northern Dancer Bold Reason 1988 Prince of Birds Storm Bird Northern Dancer Key To The Mint 1989 Shaadi Danzig Northern Dancer Hoist The Flag 1991 Fourstars Allstar Compliance Northern Dancer Bold Arian 1992 Rodrigo
    [Show full text]
  • The Beginning of a Masterpiece? Cont
    FRIDAY, 27 JULY 2018 KEW OUT, CRACKSMAN IN KING GEORGE THE BEGINNING OF In a surprise twist to the tale of Saturday=s G1 King George VI A MASTERPIECE? and Queen Elizabeth S. at Ascot, Aidan O=Brien ruled out the G1 Grand Prix de Paris winner Kew Gardens (Ire) (Galileo {Ire}) after he scoped dirty before Thursday=s confirmation stage. Ballydoyle are supervising the wellbeing of the string due to the disappointing effort of Magic Wand (Ire) (Galileo {Ire}) in Saturday=s G1 Irish Oaks, after which she was found to have had a dirty nose. AOur horses are just going through a little bit of a stage--a little bit of a change--and the odd one is not scoping right at the moment,@ he explained. AWe=ve seen it with the filly in the Oaks and we just have to be careful.@ The removal of Kew Gardens means that Ryan Moore is on last year=s G1 Qipco British Champions Fillies & Mares S. heroine Hydrangea (Ire) (Galileo {Ire}) and the sole 3-year-old in the line-up will be the stable=s G1 Irish Derby runner-up Rostropovich (Ire) (Frankel {GB}). Cont. p5 Galileo=s Anthony Van Dyck takes the Tyros S. | Racing Post IN TDN AMERICA TODAY Despite having to navigate troubled waters as a bug infects PHOENIX ‘DREAMING’ BIG AT THE SPA parts of the Ballydoyle armada, Anthony Van Dyck (Ire) (Galileo Phoenix Thoroughbreds, off to a flyer at Saratoga with an {Ire}) was a faithful steer for Ryan Moore as he handed Aidan opening day ‘TDN Rising Star’, is primed for a big summer at the O=Brien a 12th win in resounding fashion in the G3 Japan Racing upstate oval.
    [Show full text]
  • Horses of Assateague Island Population and Habitat Viability Assessment Workshop
    Horses of Assateague Island Population and Habitat Viability Assessment Workshop 29 – 31 March 2006 Berlin, MD, US FINAL REPORT Horses of Assateague Island Population and Habitat Viability Assessment Workshop 29 – 31 March 2006 Berlin, MD, US Final Report Conservation Breeding Specialist Group / SSC / IUCN Workshop organized by: Assateague Island National Seashore (ASIS); IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group (CBSG). Workshop financial support provided by: National Park Service (NPS). Cover photos courtesy of Allison Turner, NPS (horses) and Kathy Traylor-Holzer, CBSG (habitat). Section divider photos courtesy of Allison Turner (sections 1, 5, 8, I), NPS; David Powell (3); and Kathy Traylor- Holzer (2, 4, 6, 7, II, III, IV). A contribution of the IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group. IUCN encourages meetings, workshops and other fora for the consideration and analysis of issues related to conservation, and believes that reports of these meetings are most useful when broadly disseminated. The opinions and views expressed by the authors may not necessarily reflect the formal policies of IUCN, its Commissions, its Secretariat or its members. The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © Copyright CBSG 2006 Zimmerman, C., M. Sturm, J. Ballou, and K. Traylor-Holzer (eds.). 2006. Horses of Assateague Island Population and Habitat Viability Assessment: Final Report. IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, Apple Valley, MN. Additional copies of Horses of Assateague Island Population and Habitat Viability Assessment Final Report can be ordered through the IUCN/SSC CBSG office ([email protected] or www.cbsg.org).
    [Show full text]
  • Ascot Racecourse & World Horse Racing International Challengers
    Ascot Racecourse & World Horse Racing International Challengers Press Event Newmarket, Thursday, June 13, 2019 BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR ROYAL ASCOT 2019 Deirdre (JPN) 5 b m Harbinger (GB) - Reizend (JPN) (Special Week (JPN)) Born: April 4, 2014 Breeder: Northern Farm Owner: Toji Morita Trainer: Mitsuru Hashida Jockey: Yutaka Take Form: 3/64110/63112-646 *Aimed at the £750,000 G1 Prince Of Wales’s Stakes over 10 furlongs on June 19 – her trainer’s first runner in Britain. *The mare’s career highlight came when landing the G1 Shuka Sho over 10 furlongs at Kyoto in October, 2017. *She has also won two G3s and a G2 in Japan. *Has competed outside of Japan on four occasions, with the pick of those efforts coming when third to Benbatl in the 2018 G1 Dubai Turf (1m 1f) at Meydan, UAE, and a fast-finishing second when beaten a length by Glorious Forever in the G1 Longines Hong Kong Cup (1m 2f) at Sha Tin, Hong Kong, in December. *Fourth behind compatriot Almond Eye in this year’s G1 Dubai Turf in March. *Finished a staying-on sixth of 13 on her latest start in the G1 FWD QEII Cup (1m 2f) at Sha Tin on April 28 when coming from the rear and meeting trouble in running. Yutaka Take rode her for the first time. Race record: Starts: 23; Wins: 7; 2nd: 3; 3rd: 4; Win & Place Prize Money: £2,875,083 Toji Morita Born: December 23, 1932. Ownership history: The business owner has been registered as racehorse owner over 40 years since 1978 by the JRA (Japan Racing Association).
    [Show full text]
  • Assateague Island National Seashore
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Abbreviated Final General Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement Assateague Island National Seashore 2017 Cover Photo: Allen Sklar Final Abbreviated General Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement Assateague Island National Seashore 2017 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ABBREVIATED FINAL GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Assateague Island National Seashore, Maryland and Virginia Assateague Island National Seashore (the seashore), established in 1965, preserves the outstanding Mid-Atlantic coastal resources of Assateague Island and its adjacent waters and the natural processes upon which they depend. The seashore also provides high quality resource-compatible recreation experiences. To support these purposes, the National Park Service (NPS) has prepared a new general management plan (GMP) for the seashore, to replace the seashore’s existing GMP completed in 1982. The Draft General Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement (Draft GMP/EIS) was available for public and agency review from January 29, 2016 through May 1, 2016. The document presents and evaluates four alternatives for management of the seashore. Alternative 1. The NPS would continue to manage resources and visitor uses as it does today. The seashore enabling legislation and the existing General Management Plan (NPS 1982) would continue to guide seashore management. The NPS would manage seashore resources and visitor use as it does today, with no major change in direction. Alternative 2. Most visitors would enjoy traditional beach recreation concentrated within a high density developed area accessible by private vehicle. This alternative would likely require significant manipulation of the natural environment to protect facilities and infrastructure in the island developed area.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Chincoteague Comprehensive Plan
    TOWN OF CHINCOTEAGUE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Chincoteague, Virginia Approved January 4, 2010 5 YEAR UPDATE Approved February 2, 2015 Chincoteague, Virginia Comprehensive Plan Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................. I-1 Plan Organization ..................................................................................................... I-2 Legal Framework ...................................................................................................... I-2 Acronyms…………………………………………………………………………...I-4 List of Reports/Studies……………………………………………………………. I-5 Chapter 1 Community Profile .............................................................................. 1-1 History of Chincoteague .......................................................................................... 1-1 Socio-Economic Characteristics ............................................................................. 1-3 Population ............................................................................................................ 1-4 Race...................................................................................................................... 1-4 Age and Sex ......................................................................................................... 1-4 Households ........................................................................................................... 1-4 Natural Features .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • General Background Study and Historical Base Map, Assateague
    GENERAL BACKGROUND STUDY and HISTORICAL BASE MAP Assateague Island National Seashore Maryland - Virginia By EDWIN C. BEARSS DIVISION OF HISTORY Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation December 18, 1968 ational Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior BASIC DATA STUDY HISTORY Assateague Island National Seashore December 31, 1968 Prepared by Edwin c. Bearss Approved by •oooo•••OOOOO• Regional Director, NE • TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Table of Contents •• $ 0 0 i 0 0 List of Maps and Illustrations Q • 0 0 0 0 ii Foreword iii Chapter I Geographic Setting 1 Chapte.c lI Giovanni ca Verrazzano and Assateague • • 3 Chapter III First Settlements • • • • 7 Chapter IV The Pasturage of Horses and Cattle 0 • 18 Chapter v Inlets 0 0 25 Chapter VI The Life-Saving Service and United States Coast Guard • • • • • 0 34 Chapter VII Assateague Light 48 Chapter VIII German Submarines off Assateague • 59 Chapter IX Villages and Communities 0 80 Chapter X Economic Activities Other Than Livestock Raising and Hunting • • • • • • • • 91 Chapter XI The Extension of the Hook at Toms Cove . • 98 Chapter XII Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge •• • 0 0 100 Chapter XIII Assateague Island National Seashore •• 0 0 101 Appendix A Reports of Assistance • • • 0 0 0 0 0 • 102 Appendix B Vessels Destroyed by U-151 • 0 0 128 Appendix C List of Classified Structures • 0 • 131 Appendix D Land Classification •• • 134 Bibliography 000000000 0 0 136 i LIST OF MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS PLATE Following Bibliography I Historical Base Map--Assateague National Seashore II North
    [Show full text]