Newsletter May 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Newsletter May 2021 Church Street, with Pytchley Row on the right-hand side projecting beyond the smaller houses of Calico Yard c.1903. Newsletter May 2021 1 Programme of Speakers - Update It has now been over a year since the first lockdown came into effect and bought about the cancellation of our monthly meetings. At the time of writing (1st April) the committee plan to recommence the monthly speakers programme from Monday 26th July with Susan Lees of the National Trust with a presentation entitled, “Memories of Stone – Historic Graffiti in the Garden Lodge at Lyveden”. This will be dependent upon the circumstances at the time, but the society is making the necessary arrangements in the hope that the Government’s “road map” for us all to return to a “normal” life in June will prove to be effective. Please also see page 19. Our website www.finedonlocalhistorysociety.co.uk and our Facebook page will be updated, closer to the time, with the confirmation (or otherwise) of our intention to hold this talk. For those members who wish to attend this meeting and do not have access to a computer for checking the latest updates please contact Mick Britton on 07988 065010. Membership Subscriptions Thank you to all those members who have paid their subscriptions for this year. Owing to the cancellation of our monthly meetings, at which many members usually pay their subscriptions, the number of paid-up members at the time of writing (1st April) is just over 60% of last year’s membership. If you wish to remain being a member of the Society and receive the newsletter, then please forward the £5 per person annual subscription to our treasurer James Sheehan, Orchard House, 17 Ivy Lane, Finedon NN9 5NE. If it is more convenient, monies can be left with Michael Shipton at 10 Rockleigh Close, Finedon. Alternatively, if you bank online it can be transferred directly into our account. Account Name Finedon Local History Society. Sort Code 09-01- 29. Account Number 02892977. Please add your name in the reference section of the transaction. Should you choose this option then please advise James by email at [email protected]. Thank you. 2 The ‘Alms Houses’ Pytchley Row Barry Wadeson FLHS member Barry recently moved to Finedon following a career, firstly as an apprentice organ builder at Northampton before “drifting” into teaching research methods in the health care sector, and then moving to the Open University. When Barry retired he returned, briefly, to organ building, working on the new organ at Worcester Cathedral. In 2014 he became a volunteer with the Churches Conservation Trust and currently looks after thirteen redundant churches in Northamptonshire, Bedfordshire and Buckinghamshire. To add to these responsibilities, last year Barry was appointed as the Finedon Parish Church archivist. This article first appeared in the July 2020 edition of the Finedon Parish Magazine and the society thanks the editor, Gill Barlow, for her permission to reprint this item. When I moved into 13 Church Street, one of a row of cottages formerly called Pytchley Row, I often heard them referred to as alms houses. They certainly look like alms houses and they also look older than they are. The distinctive gabled roofs and stone-mullioned front windows with their lozenge-shaped tracery give them a spurious air of largesse to the poor on the part of somebody wealthy: noblesse oblige and all that. In fact, they never were alms houses and the wealthy somebody was William Mackworth Dolben who built them as estate houses. There were alms houses in Finedon but, according to a map in John Bailey’s book Finedon Revealed, they were opposite the Bell Inn, and the row of just three houses for Finedon’s paupers was later demolished to make way for council houses. Mackworth Dolben stamped his authority on Finedon and his name on many of its buildings. Pytchley Row (Bailey says that it was originally called Quality Row) is indelibly imprinted with squire Mackworth Dolben’s initials (MD) on the diamond-shaped windows of houses 11 and 15 Church Street, and the date they were built (1847 AD) on the gables. My own gable is graced with D for Domini. Between 1841 and 1901 the population of Finedon increased from 1,378 to 4,129, and by 1914 the village had grown to be a small town that had over fifty shops, including five butchers and four bakers. This growth was driven by the boot and shoe trade, which I will come back to shortly, and quarrying. In their introduction to Finedon on Old Picture Postcards Andrew Swift and Robert Cheney comment: 3 “While all this expansion was taking place, the last squire of Finedon, William Mackworth Dolben, was indulging a passion for building which was matched by a passion for the fantasy world of medieval chivalry celebrated in the paintings of the Pre-Raphaelites. The result was a series of buildings which not only look much older than they are but often have an unreal fairy- tale quality to them.” In this, Mackworth Dolben was assisted by the Northampton-based architect Edmund Francis Law. It seems that the squire of Finedon had found the perfect man to realise his fantasies of a Gothic Finedon. Law was first commissioned to give Finedon Hall a makeover by adding Gothic features – including a chapel. Having spent some years on the hall, Mackworth Dolben and Law turned their attentions to the village with Pytchley Row being one of the first of their projects. Law also designed many other buildings in Finedon: Mackworth Green, the Star Finedon Parade c.1935. Coffee House and, of course, Photograph donated by Ted Amey. the ill-fated Volta Tower. Originally numbered one to eight Pytchley Row (it was still called Pytchley Row in the 1950s when the cottages were listed by English Heritage) the houses were eventually absorbed into Church Street and renumbered as five to nineteen Church Street. The architectural historian Nicholas Pevsner describes Pytchley Row in his Buildings of England: Northamptonshire as “Gothic Tudorbethan.” The Gothic Revival movement began in the mid-eighteenth century but by Victorian times had reached its highpoint under architects such as Augustus Pugin, Charles Barry and George Gilbert Scott. Sometimes called Neo Gothic, Victorian Gothic, or more disparagingly Mock Gothic, this was a movement that swept the Western world-influencing not just architecture but the arts and crafts movement that supplied the interior 4 furnishings of churches and even modest middle-class houses. The squire of Finedon and his architect were not alone in their search for the aesthetics of medieval England. To the passer-by, 5 – 19 Church Street appears to be row of Tudor Gothic cottages that have survived for centuries; only the date 1847 spread across the gables gives the game away. But if these were not alms houses who lived in them? To find out I turned to census records of 1861 to 1911. The occupants were decidedly not paupers although they may not have been well off. Instead, most Pytchley Row tenants worked in the boot and shoe trade. In the early part of the 20th century there were around 14 shoe manufacturers in Finedon; however, most of the shoes were made at home (which may explain the little barns behind the cottages). Shoemakers purchased the leather and other materials from the manufacturers and turned in their work on Saturdays. This piece work meant that if you did not make any shoes you did not get paid. It was said that in Northampton Saturday nights were a time of great drunkenness when the shoemakers turned in their work and received their pay. No doubt Finedon saw similar scenes too if the number of extinct pubs in Finedon is anything to go by. Almost without exception the residents of Pytchley Row worked either in the shoe trade or in service. Originally the houses had two bedrooms although most are now one bedroomed due to interior alteration to create an indoor toilet and bathroom (in my back yard are the remains of an outdoor toilet hut which has since been converted to a raised mini garden). Rather surprisingly, we find from census records that up to six people were living in some of the cottages, these included boarders and lodgers. In 1861 my house (then No 5 Pytchley Row) was occupied by Thomas Lawton and his wife Jane. Thomas is described as a cordwainer, someone who made shoes from a certain type of expensive leather. Their daughter, also called Jane, at the age of 14 was already making shoes, and two nephews, Henry and Frederick Panter aged 13 and 10 respectively, were likewise engaged in shoe making. No doubt this provided the Lawton’s with a decent standard of living since the nephews would have been expected to pay for their board. Perhaps the little barn at the rear acted as both workshop and sleeping quarters! The Pytchley Row cottages are constructed of ironstone at the front facing Church Street, but at the back the thick walls are made of cheaper limestone. Except for No. 11 Church Street, which became a temporary post office around the turn of the century, all the entrances are at the rear of the houses and are reached by two passageways from Church Street through Tudor style arches. No. 11 has both a front door and a rear 5 extension that now blocks what was once an alleyway that ran from one end of Pytchley Row to the other. When Ellen, the daughter of William Mackworth Dolben, died in 1912 the estate was broken up and sold.
Recommended publications
  • Patronage, Performance, and Reputation in the Eighteenth-Century Church
    PATRONAGE, PERFORMANCE, AND REPUTATION IN THE EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY CHURCH DANIEL REED OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the award of Doctor of Philosophy in History SEPTEMBER 2019 1 Lancelot Blackburne, Archbishop of York. After unknown artist. Mezzotint, sold by Thomas Bakewell. 1724 or after. Private collection of Daniel Reed. 2 For Freya 3 Abstract The perceived success of the revisionist programme in dissipating the ‘longest shadow in modern historiography’ calls into question the ongoing relevance of ‘optimistic’ versus ‘pessimistic’ interpretations of the Church of England in the long eighteenth century. And yet, the case of Lancelot Blackburne, Archbishop of York (1724-1743), has not benefitted from the ‘revisionist turn’ and represents an unparalleled problem in accounts of the Georgian episcopate. Whilst Benjamin Hoadly has been the most maligned bishop of the period for his theology, Blackburne is the most derided for his personal imperfections and supposed negligence of his episcopal duties. These references are often pernicious and euphemistic, manifesting in several quasi-apocryphal tales. The most regularly occurring being accounts of Blackburne’s lasciviousness, speculation over the paternity of his chaplain Thomas Hayter, and the Archbishop’s association with piracy. As long as these bastions of resistance to revisionism remain, negative assumptions will linger on in contemporary studies of the Church, regardless of whether they are reframed by current trends. As such, this thesis utilises under-explored archival sources to reorient Blackburne’s case to its historical context. This is achieved through an exploration of the inter-connected themes of patronage, performance, and reputation.
    [Show full text]
  • Rochester Cathedral Heraldry Before A.D. 1800
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society ( 113 ) ROCHESTER CATHEDRAL HERALDRY BEFORE A.D. 1800. CompUed by Paymaster Commander A. W. B. MESSENGER, R.N. THERE is very little heraldry of pre-Reformation execution in the Cathedral. The principal examples are the two shields (Nos. 10 and 11) on Bishop Lowe's tomb, whUe the remainder are comprised by the three small shields (Nos. 1, 2 and 3) on the sedilia canopy, to which may perhaps be added the three in the south transept gable (Nos. 76, 77 and 78) and the defaced painted shield (No. 84) now reposing in the slype. AU heraldic brasses have gone. The shields from the Somers tomb (Nos. 79-83) wiU probably be of most interest to genealogists, and I am glad to be able to quote what appears to be the original grant of Richard Watts' arms (No. 28). The arms of the bishops painted on the quire waUs were executed at the time of the restoration work under Sir Gfibert Scott and are therefore outside the scope of the present paper. In the Armorial the blazons are those actually existing or such for which evidence of former existence is available at the time of this survey. Errors and variations whl be found referred to in the Inventory. The manner of blazoning generally follows the sug- gestions of the late Sir W. St. J. Hope (Grammar of Heraldry) and of Mr. Oswald Barron (Enc. Brit., 12th ed.), and, for the sake of uniformity, blazonings taken from other sources are as a rule similarly expressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Journal the Palace Or Manor-House of the Bishops of Rochester at Bromley, Kent, with Some Notes on Their Early Re
    This article was downloaded by: [Northwestern University] On: 03 February 2015, At: 23:25 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Archaeological Journal Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/raij20 The Palace or Manor-House of the Bishops of Rochester at Bromley, Kent, with some Notes on their Early Residences Philip Norman LL.D., F.S.A. Published online: 17 Jul 2014. To cite this article: Philip Norman LL.D., F.S.A. (1920) The Palace or Manor- House of the Bishops of Rochester at Bromley, Kent, with some Notes on their Early Residences, Archaeological Journal, 77:1, 148-176, DOI: 10.1080/00665983.1920.10853350 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00665983.1920.10853350 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • The Architectural History of the Cathedral Church and Monastery of St Andrew at Rochester
    Archaeologia Cantiana Vol. 23 1898 ( 194 ) THE ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY OF THE CATHEDRAL CHURCH AND MONAS- TERY OF ST. ANDREW AT ROCHESTER. BY W. H. ST. JOHN HOPE, M.A. THE following account is based,, so far as the architectural history of the cathedral church is concerned, upon two papers communicated by me (1) to the St. Paul's Ecclesiological Society in 1883, and printed in its Transactions,* and (2) to the Society of Antiquaries in 1884, and printed in Archteologia.-f Since the publication of these papers some important additional evidence has come to light with reference to the Norman church and a yet earlier building, J and further discoveries have shewn that certain views put forth in my first paper are untenable. The recent identifica- tion of the Roman wall of the city has also cleared up several doubtful points.§ I have therefore practically re-written the whole of the architectural history of the church, and appended to it my hitherto unpublished researches among the monastic buildings. 1. THE CATHEDRAL CHTJBCH. " In the year of the Incarnation of our Lord 604," says Bseda, "Augustine, archbishop of the Britons, ordained two bishops, namely Mellitus and Justus;" Mellitus was sent to London, " but Justus Augustine ordained bishop in Kent itself in the city of Durobreve/' that is Rochester, " in which long .ZEthilberct made the church of the blessed * Vol. i. 217-230. t Vol. xlix. 322-334. | See a paper on the "Foundations of the Saxon Cathedral Church of Rochester," by the Rev. Greville M. Livett, in ArcJiceologia Cantiana, XVIII. 261-278.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Passenger Lists Student Materials
    To Virginia (Chesapeake), June 23, 1635 (Modified) THESE under-written names are to be transported to Virginia, Embarked in the America, per Certificate of from the Minister of the Town of Gravesend of their loyalty to the orders of the Church of England. Richard Sadd 23 John Yates 20 Thomas Wakefield 17 Richard Wood 36 Thomas Bennett 22 Isack Bull 27 Steven Read 24 Phillipp Remmington 29 William Stanbridge 27 Radulph Spraging 37 Henry Barker 18 George Chaundler 29 James Foster 21 Thomas Johnson 19 Thomas Talbott 20 George Brookes 35 Richard Young 31 Robert Sabyn 40 Robert Thomas 20 Phillipp Parsons 10 John Farepoynt 20 Henry Parsons 14 Robert Askyn 22 John Eeles 16 Samuell Awde 24 Richard Miller 12 Miles Fletcher 27 Symon Richardson 23 William Evans 23 Thomas Boomer 13 Lawrence Farebern 23 George Dulmare 8 Mathew Robinson 24 John Underwood 19 Richard Hersey 22 William Bernard 27 John Robinson 32 Charles Wallinger 24 Edmond Chipps 19 Ryce Hooe 36 Thomas Pritchard 32 John Carter 54 Jonathan Bronsford 21 William Cowley 20 Women. John Shawe 16 Elizabeth Remington 20 Richard Gummy 21 Dorothy Standich 22 Bartholomew Holton 25 Suzan Death 22 John White 21 Elizabeth Death 3 Thomas Chappell 33 Alice Remmington 26 Hugh Fox 24 Dorothie Baker 18 Davie Morris 32 Elizabeth Baker 18 Rowland Cotton 22 Sara Colebank 20 William Thomas 22 Mary Thurrogood 19 Examining Passenger Lists To New England, April 2, 1635 (Modified) THESE under-written names are to be transported to New England, Embarked in the Planter, the passengers have brought Certificate from the Justices of the Peace according to the King’s order.
    [Show full text]
  • Statute Law Revision Act 2009
    ———————— Number 46 of 2009 ———————— STATUTE LAW REVISION ACT 2009 ———————— ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1. Definitions. 2. General statute law revision repeal and saver. 3. Specific repeals. 4. Assignment of short titles. 5. Miscellaneous amendments to short titles. 6. Savings. 7. Short title and collective citation. SCHEDULE 1 Acts Retained Part 1 Irish Private Acts to 31 December 1750 Part 2 English Private Acts before Union with Scotland (1707) Part 3 Private Acts of Great Britain 1707 to 31 December 1750 Part 4 United Kingdom Local and Personal Acts 1 January 1801 to 31 December 1850 SCHEDULE 2 Acts specifically repealed Part 1 Irish Private Acts to 31 December 1750 1 [No. 46.]Statute Law Revision Act 2009. [2009.] Part 2 English Private Acts before Union with Scotland (1707) Part 3 Private Acts of Great Britain 1707 to 31 December 1750 Part 4 United Kingdom Local and Personal Acts 1 January 1801 to 31 December 1850 ———————— Acts Referred to Dublin and Belfast Junction Railway Amendment 1847 (10 & 11 Vict.) Act 1847 c. cxi Interpretation Act 2005 2005, No. 23 Local Government Act 2001 2001, No. 37 Short Titles Acts 1896 to 2007 Sligo Ship Canal Act 1846 1846 (9 & 10 Vict.) c. ccclxiii Statute Law Revision Act 2007 2007, No. 28 Waterford and Limerick Railway Act 1845 1845 (8 & 9 Vict.) c. cxxxi 2 ———————— Number 46 of 2009 ———————— STATUTE LAW REVISION ACT 2009 ———————— AN ACT TO PROMOTE THE REVISION OF STATUTE LAW BY REPEALING CERTAIN STATUTES OF A SPECIFIED SERIES THAT WERE ENACTED ON OR BEFORE 31 DECEMBER 1750 AND CERTAIN OTHER STATUTES OF ANOTHER SPECIFIED SERIES THAT WERE ENACTED ON OR BEFORE 31 DECEMBER 1850 AND WHICH HAVE CEASED TO HAVE EFFECT OR HAVE BECOME UNNECESSARY, BY IDENTIFYING THOSE STATUTES THAT WERE SO ENACTED BUT ARE NOT BEING REPEALED BY THIS ACT, BY ASSIGNING SHORT TITLES TO CERTAIN STATUTES IN ORDER TO FACILI- TATE THEIR CITATION AND BY AMENDING CERTAIN STATUTES IN SO FAR AS THEY RELATE TO SHORT TITLES, AND TO PROVIDE FOR RELATED MATTERS.
    [Show full text]
  • Palmer 1899 GH Palmer, the Cathedral Church of Rochester, 2Nd
    Palmer 1899 G. H. Palmer, The cathedral church of Rochester, 2nd ed. (London, 1899). <i> BELL’S CATHEDRAL SERIES EDITED BY GLEESON WHITE AND EDWARD F. STRANGE ROCHESTER <ii> <blank> <iii> <blank> <iv> NORTH-EAST VIEW, WITH RUINS OF GUNDULF’S TOWER (FROM A PHOTOGRAPH BY MESSRS. CARL NORMAN AND CO.). <v> THE CATHEDRAL CHURCH OF ROCHESTER A DESCRIPTION OF ITS FABRIC AND A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE EPISCOPAL SEE BY G. H. PALMER, B.A. WITH THIRTY-EIGHT <shield> ILLUSTRATIONS LONDON GEORGE BELL & SONS 1899 <vi> First Published, April, 1897. Second Edition, Revised, 1899. <vii> GENERAL PREFACE. This series of monographs has been planned to supply visitors to the great English Cathedrals with accurate and well illus- trated guide books at a popular price. The aim of each writer has been to produce a work compiled with sufficient knowledge and scholarship to be of value to the student of archæology and history, and yet not too technical in language for the use of an ordinary visitor or tourist. To specify all the authorities which have been made use of in each case would be difficult and tedious in this place. But amongst the general sources of information which have been almost invariably found useful are: – firstly, the great county histories, the value of which, especially in questions of genealogy and local records, is generally recognized; secondly, the numerous papers by experts which appear from time to time in the transactions of the antiquarian and archæological societies; thirdly, the important documents made accessible in the series issued by the Master of the Rolls; fourthly, the well- known works of Britton and Willis on the English Cathedrals; and, lastly, the very excellent series of Handbooks to the Cathedrals, originated by the late Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Hasted's Kent Rochester in 1798
    Hasted’s Kent Rochester in 1798 Edward Hasted, The history and topographical survey of the county of Kent, second edition, volume 4 (Canterbury, 1798), pages 45–191 THE CITY AND LIBERTY OF ROCHESTER. EASTWARD from Stroud, on the opposite side of the river Medway, lies THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, situated on an angle of land formed by that river, which coming from the south runs northward until it has passed the city, after which it directs its course due east. The jurisdiction of this city was antiently called the hundred of Rochester./q /q See Reg. Roff. p. 49. 46 ROCHESTER was a place of some note in the time of the Romans, owing to its situation at the accustomed pass over the river Medway. It was probably called by the Britons Durobrivæ, from the British word Dour Water, and the termination Briva, which is added to the old names of many places, and might signify among the antient Britons and Gauls, a bridge, or passage over a river; since it is no where used, but in the names of places situated like this at rivers./r Antoninus, in his Itinerary, calls it by the name of Durobrivis, though it is corruptly spelt various ways in the different copies of it. In the Peutingerian military tables, in the decline of the Roman empire, it is writ= ten Roibis; from which contracted, and the addition of the word ceaster (derived from the Latin, castrum, used by our Saxon ancestors to signify a city, town or castle) they called it Hroueceaster, and by a further con= traction, Rochester,/s and here it is to be observed, that all places ending in chester, fashioned in the Saxon times, have arisen from the ruins of the old Roman castra, not that the former were always placed in the very same scite, though they were never very remote from it./t Hence the antient stations about the noted Roman wall, the ruins of many of which are still vi= sible, are called chesters by the country people.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Passenger Lists
    To Virginia (Chesapeake), June 23, 1635 (Modified) THESE under-written names are to be transported to Virginia, Embarked in the America, per Certificate of from the Minister of the Town of Gravesend of their loyalty to the orders of the Church of England. Richard Sadd 23 John Yates 20 Thomas Wakefield 17 Richard Wood 36 Thomas Bennett 22 Isack Bull 27 Steven Read 24 Phillipp Remmington 29 William Stanbridge 27 Radulph Spraging 37 Henry Barker 18 George Chaundler 29 James Foster 21 Thomas Johnson 19 Thomas Talbott 20 George Brookes 35 Richard Young 31 Robert Sabyn 40 Robert Thomas 20 Phillipp Parsons 10 John Farepoynt 20 Henry Parsons 14 Robert Askyn 22 John Eeles 16 Samuell Awde 24 Richard Miller 12 Miles Fletcher 27 Symon Richardson 23 William Evans 23 Thomas Boomer 13 Lawrence Farebern 23 George Dulmare 8 Mathew Robinson 24 John Underwood 19 Richard Hersey 22 William Bernard 27 John Robinson 32 Charles Wallinger 24 Edmond Chipps 19 Ryce Hooe 36 Thomas Pritchard 32 John Carter 54 Jonathan Bronsford 21 William Cowley 20 Women. John Shawe 16 Elizabeth Remington 20 Richard Gummy 21 Dorothy Standich 22 Bartholomew Holton 25 Suzan Death 22 John White 21 Elizabeth Death 3 Thomas Chappell 33 Alice Remmington 26 Hugh Fox 24 Dorothie Baker 18 Davie Morris 32 Elizabeth Baker 18 Rowland Cotton 22 Sara Colebank 20 William Thomas 22 Mary Thurrogood 19 Examining Passenger Lists To New England, April 2, 1635 (Modified) THESE under-written names are to be transported to New England, Embarked in the Planter, the passengers have brought Certificate from the Justices of the Peace according to the King’s order.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacobites Under the Beds: Bishop Francis Atterbury, the Earl of Sunderland and the Westminster School Dormitory Case of 1721
    JACOBITES UNDER THE BEDS: BISHOP FRANCIS ATTERBURY, THE EARL OF SUNDERLAND AND THE WESTMINSTER SCHOOL DORMITORY CASE OF 1721 CLYVEJONES IN British Library, Harleian MS. 7190 there is a list of names which at first glance seems puzzling, even to an historian of early eighteenth-century Britain.-^ The initial clue to its identification comes from the words 'For the Bp of Rochester' and ' Ag[ain]st' at the foot of the two columns of names. A quick check of the numbers of names reveals that this is a division list of those in the House of Lords who voted for and against Bishop Francis Atterbury's appeal against a Court of Chancery decision to proceed to trial over the building of a new dormitory for Westminster School. The vote on 16 May 1721 went in Atterbury's favour by 26 to 24. The curious nature of the list arises from an analysis of those who supported and those who opposed the Bishop. Atterbury (fig. i) was a high Tory and leading (though secret) advocate in England of the restoration of the Stuart Pretender (James Francis Edward, son of James II). Thus is seems strange that those who voted for him in the hst included several of the high officers of state in the Whig administration, including the 'prime minister', the Earl of Sunderland, while some of Atterbury's opponents were his fellow Jacobites. Was this curious state of affairs merely a result of the peers and bishops voting according to their understanding of the pros and cons of the legal case, putting aside all political considerations; or was this one of those legal cases which occasionally become inextricably entangled with politics? If the latter, then clearly it was a case which caused politicians to break the usual bonds of Whig and Tory, government and opposition.^ It was not unknown for legal cases in the House of Lords to be dominated by party considerations; such cases always aroused considerable contemporary interest.^ As we shall see, however, the Westminster School dormitory case was more interesting and more politically complex than most.
    [Show full text]
  • William Wildash (Publisher) the History and Antiquities of Rochester Rochester 1833
    William Wildash (publisher) The history and antiquities of Rochester Rochester 1833 <1> THE HISTORY AND ANTIQUITIES OF ROCHESTER, AND THE VICINITY. ROCHESTER: PRINTED BY W. WILDASH, HIGH-STREET, MDCCCXXXIII. <2> <blank> <3> CONTENTS. PAGE Ancient Walls and Streets1 Civil History9 Government, Privileges, and present state of Rochester 13 The Town-Hall 15 Charities 19 The Castle 24 The Cathedral 42 The Priory; its Dissolution; and the establishment of the Dean and Chapter *60 St. Nicholas Church 77 Bully Hill 87 The Bridge 93 The Bridge Chamber 103 The Grammar School 106 St. Margaret’s Church 109 Strood Church 118 <4> <blank> <5> THE History of Rochester. &c. &c. ROCHESTER is situated on an angle of land form= ed by the current of the river Medway, which coming from the south, runs northward until it has passed by the city, and then turning, proceeds nearly to the east. This city is undoubtedly very ancient. The Romans called it Durobrovis and Durobrovum, and by the Saxons it was denominated Hroffe, and Hrooffe ceaster, from which by contraction it obtained its pre= sent name of Rochester. Bede says it took its name from one Roffe, who first built here, and that it was formerly considered rather as a castle than a city, and accordingly he styles it "the Kentishmens’ Castle." Rochester has never been very extensive, and ap= pears to be larger now than it was formerly. From ancient records there seems no question, but this city was walled before the conquest. Its natural situation on an angle of land, by a large river, and in the direct road from East Kent to London, made it a pass of some importance, and induced the kings and generals of ancient times, to improve it as a security against the invasion of their enemies.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MANOR and the PALACE *& -E X 'L IB R IS '<£* PH Lb N O RM an 4 5 , E V E L Y N* GAR: DENS*S
    THE MANOR AND THE PALACE By Ph ilip N orman, LL.D., F.S.A. *&-EX‘LIBRIS’<£* P H l b N O R M A N 4 5 , E V E L Y N* G A R : D E N S * S W* I THE BISHOP’S PALACE, BROMLEY, 1756. From an engraving in the folio edition of Hasted’s “ History of Kent.” 75l J ^>vi- A ^ L C ^ - r r i^ n *Y<t:-« v / . ^ ,7^-r CKmJ-C- 4j £jU*s M auo^ti ^$.A .. Chapter V I BROMLEY AND THE BISHOPS OF ROCHESTER TO THE END OF THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY A R T of this chapter appeared in the Archeological Journal for 1920, but it has been rewritten with additions and corrections, for several of which I take the opportunity o f thanking Mr. W. Baxter. In my Pefforts to ascertain the main facts I owe much to the able account of Bromley, still in manuscript, which was compiled by the late Mr. Coles Child with the help of various experts. It formed the basis of the paper in Archeologia Cantiana, Vol. X III, 1880, called “ The Church and Manor of Bromley,” by the late Dr. W. T. Beeby. The origin o f Bromley as a place of habitation need here only be referred to in the briefest way. The story of its connection with the Saxon Bishops of Rochester is rather difficult to follow. In Dugdale’s Monasticon, with additions, ed. 1830, Vol. I, p. 154, it is said that “ Offa, King of Mercia, gave jointly with Sigered, King of Kent a .d .
    [Show full text]